Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy:
Passenger vehicles are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and prodigious consumers of petroleum, making their fuel economy an important focus of energy policy. Whether or not the market for fuel economy functions efficiently has important implications for both the type and intensity of energ...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2010
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Passenger vehicles are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and prodigious consumers of petroleum, making their fuel economy an important focus of energy policy. Whether or not the market for fuel economy functions efficiently has important implications for both the type and intensity of energy and environmental policies for motor vehicles. There are undoubtedly imperfections in the market for fuel economy but their consequences are difficult to quantify. The evidence from econometric studies, mostly from the US, is reviewed and shown to vary widely, providing evidence for both significant under- and over-valuation and everything in between. Market research is scarce, but indicates that the rational economic model, in general, does not appear to be used by consumers when comparing the fuel economy of new vehicles. Some recent studies have stressed the role of uncertainty and risk or loss aversion in consumers' decision making. Uncertainty plus loss aversion appears to be a reasonable theoretical model of consumers' evaluation of fuel economy, with profound implications for manufacturers' technology and design decisions. The theory implies that markets will substantially undervalue fuel economy relative to its expected present value. It also has potentially important implications for welfare analysis of alternative policy instruments |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
DOI: | 10.1787/5kmjp68qtm6f-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047935324 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220413s2010 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5kmjp68qtm6f-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061268496 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1312698419 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047935324 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Greene, David L... |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy |c David L. Greene |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2010 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers | |
520 | |a Passenger vehicles are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and prodigious consumers of petroleum, making their fuel economy an important focus of energy policy. Whether or not the market for fuel economy functions efficiently has important implications for both the type and intensity of energy and environmental policies for motor vehicles. There are undoubtedly imperfections in the market for fuel economy but their consequences are difficult to quantify. The evidence from econometric studies, mostly from the US, is reviewed and shown to vary widely, providing evidence for both significant under- and over-valuation and everything in between. Market research is scarce, but indicates that the rational economic model, in general, does not appear to be used by consumers when comparing the fuel economy of new vehicles. Some recent studies have stressed the role of uncertainty and risk or loss aversion in consumers' decision making. Uncertainty plus loss aversion appears to be a reasonable theoretical model of consumers' evaluation of fuel economy, with profound implications for manufacturers' technology and design decisions. The theory implies that markets will substantially undervalue fuel economy relative to its expected present value. It also has potentially important implications for welfare analysis of alternative policy instruments | ||
650 | 4 | |a Transport | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmjp68qtm6f-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316817 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1818806082739372032 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Greene, David L.. |
author_facet | Greene, David L.. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Greene, David L.. |
author_variant | d l g dl dlg |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047935324 |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061268496 (OCoLC)1312698419 (DE-599)BVBBV047935324 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5kmjp68qtm6f-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047935324</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2010 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5kmjp68qtm6f-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061268496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312698419</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047935324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Greene, David L...</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy</subfield><subfield code="c">David L. Greene</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Passenger vehicles are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and prodigious consumers of petroleum, making their fuel economy an important focus of energy policy. Whether or not the market for fuel economy functions efficiently has important implications for both the type and intensity of energy and environmental policies for motor vehicles. There are undoubtedly imperfections in the market for fuel economy but their consequences are difficult to quantify. The evidence from econometric studies, mostly from the US, is reviewed and shown to vary widely, providing evidence for both significant under- and over-valuation and everything in between. Market research is scarce, but indicates that the rational economic model, in general, does not appear to be used by consumers when comparing the fuel economy of new vehicles. Some recent studies have stressed the role of uncertainty and risk or loss aversion in consumers' decision making. Uncertainty plus loss aversion appears to be a reasonable theoretical model of consumers' evaluation of fuel economy, with profound implications for manufacturers' technology and design decisions. The theory implies that markets will substantially undervalue fuel economy relative to its expected present value. It also has potentially important implications for welfare analysis of alternative policy instruments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmjp68qtm6f-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316817</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047935324 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:04Z |
indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:04:07Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316817 |
oclc_num | 1312698419 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2010 |
publishDateSearch | 2010 |
publishDateSort | 2010 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers |
spelling | Greene, David L... Verfasser aut Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy David L. Greene Paris OECD Publishing 2010 1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers Passenger vehicles are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and prodigious consumers of petroleum, making their fuel economy an important focus of energy policy. Whether or not the market for fuel economy functions efficiently has important implications for both the type and intensity of energy and environmental policies for motor vehicles. There are undoubtedly imperfections in the market for fuel economy but their consequences are difficult to quantify. The evidence from econometric studies, mostly from the US, is reviewed and shown to vary widely, providing evidence for both significant under- and over-valuation and everything in between. Market research is scarce, but indicates that the rational economic model, in general, does not appear to be used by consumers when comparing the fuel economy of new vehicles. Some recent studies have stressed the role of uncertainty and risk or loss aversion in consumers' decision making. Uncertainty plus loss aversion appears to be a reasonable theoretical model of consumers' evaluation of fuel economy, with profound implications for manufacturers' technology and design decisions. The theory implies that markets will substantially undervalue fuel economy relative to its expected present value. It also has potentially important implications for welfare analysis of alternative policy instruments Transport https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmjp68qtm6f-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Greene, David L.. Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy Transport |
title | Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy |
title_auth | Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy |
title_exact_search | Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy |
title_exact_search_txtP | Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy |
title_full | Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy David L. Greene |
title_fullStr | Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy David L. Greene |
title_full_unstemmed | Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy David L. Greene |
title_short | Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy |
title_sort | why the new market for new passenger cars generally undervalues fuel economy |
topic | Transport |
topic_facet | Transport |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmjp68qtm6f-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenedavidl whythenewmarketfornewpassengercarsgenerallyundervaluesfueleconomy |