№ 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris:
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Brussels [Belgium]
CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies
2015
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | This paper examines the EU counterterrorism policy responses to the attacks in Paris, 7-9 January 2015. It provides an overview of the main EU-level initiatives that have been put forward in the weeks following the events and that will be discussed in the informal European Council meeting of 12 February 2015. The paper argues that a majority of these proposals predated the Paris shootings and had until that point proved contentious as regards their efficacy, legitimacy and lawfulness. A case in point is the EU Passenger Name Record (PNR) proposal. The paper finds that EU counterterrorism policy responses to the Paris events raise two fundamental challenges: ** A first challenge is to the freedom of movement, Schengen and Union citizenship. The priority given to the expansion in the use of large-scale surveillance and systematic monitoring of all travellers including EU citizens stands in contravention of Schengen and the free movement principle. ** A second challenge concerns EU democratic rule of law. Current pressures calling for an urgent adoption of measures like the EU PNR challenge the scrutiny roles held by the European Parliament and the Court of Justice of the European Union on counterterrorism measures in a post-Lisbon Treaty setting. // The paper proposes that the EU adopts a new European Agenda on Security and Liberty based on an EU security (criminal justice-led) cooperation model firmly anchored in current EU legal principles and rule of law standards. This model would call for ‘less is more’ concerning the use, processing and retention of data by police and intelligence communities, and it would instead pursue better and more accurate use of data that would meet the quality standards of evidence in criminal judicial proceedings |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 21) |
ISBN: | 9789461384485 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047862740 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220303s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9789461384485 |9 978-94-6138-448-5 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol982527 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1302327272 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047862740 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bigo, Didier |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris |
264 | 1 | |a Brussels [Belgium] |b CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies |c 2015 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2015 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 21) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a This paper examines the EU counterterrorism policy responses to the attacks in Paris, 7-9 January 2015. It provides an overview of the main EU-level initiatives that have been put forward in the weeks following the events and that will be discussed in the informal European Council meeting of 12 February 2015. The paper argues that a majority of these proposals predated the Paris shootings and had until that point proved contentious as regards their efficacy, legitimacy and lawfulness. A case in point is the EU Passenger Name Record (PNR) proposal. The paper finds that EU counterterrorism policy responses to the Paris events raise two fundamental challenges: ** A first challenge is to the freedom of movement, Schengen and Union citizenship. The priority given to the expansion in the use of large-scale surveillance and systematic monitoring of all travellers including EU citizens stands in contravention of Schengen and the free movement principle. ** A second challenge concerns EU democratic rule of law. Current pressures calling for an urgent adoption of measures like the EU PNR challenge the scrutiny roles held by the European Parliament and the Court of Justice of the European Union on counterterrorism measures in a post-Lisbon Treaty setting. // The paper proposes that the EU adopts a new European Agenda on Security and Liberty based on an EU security (criminal justice-led) cooperation model firmly anchored in current EU legal principles and rule of law standards. This model would call for ‘less is more’ concerning the use, processing and retention of data by police and intelligence communities, and it would instead pursue better and more accurate use of data that would meet the quality standards of evidence in criminal judicial proceedings | ||
650 | 4 | |a Politics / Political Sciences | |
650 | 4 | |a Politics | |
650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
650 | 4 | |a Criminal Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Security and defense | |
650 | 4 | |a Penal Policy | |
700 | 1 | |a Brouwer, Evelien |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Carrera, Sergio |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Guild, Elspeth |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Guittet, Emmanuel-Pierre |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jeandesboz, Julien |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ragazzi, Francesco |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Scherrer, Amandine |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Scherrer, Felix |4 aut | |
710 | 2 | |a Central and Eastern European Online Library |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033245322 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=982527 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804183435837702144 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Bigo, Didier Brouwer, Evelien Carrera, Sergio Guild, Elspeth Guittet, Emmanuel-Pierre Jeandesboz, Julien Ragazzi, Francesco Scherrer, Amandine Scherrer, Felix |
author_facet | Bigo, Didier Brouwer, Evelien Carrera, Sergio Guild, Elspeth Guittet, Emmanuel-Pierre Jeandesboz, Julien Ragazzi, Francesco Scherrer, Amandine Scherrer, Felix |
author_role | aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
author_sort | Bigo, Didier |
author_variant | d b db e b eb s c sc e g eg e p g epg j j jj f r fr a s as f s fs |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047862740 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol982527 (OCoLC)1302327272 (DE-599)BVBBV047862740 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03440nmm a2200517zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047862740</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220303s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789461384485</subfield><subfield code="9">978-94-6138-448-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol982527</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1302327272</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047862740</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bigo, Didier</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">№ 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Brussels [Belgium]</subfield><subfield code="b">CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 21)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper examines the EU counterterrorism policy responses to the attacks in Paris, 7-9 January 2015. It provides an overview of the main EU-level initiatives that have been put forward in the weeks following the events and that will be discussed in the informal European Council meeting of 12 February 2015. The paper argues that a majority of these proposals predated the Paris shootings and had until that point proved contentious as regards their efficacy, legitimacy and lawfulness. A case in point is the EU Passenger Name Record (PNR) proposal. The paper finds that EU counterterrorism policy responses to the Paris events raise two fundamental challenges: ** A first challenge is to the freedom of movement, Schengen and Union citizenship. The priority given to the expansion in the use of large-scale surveillance and systematic monitoring of all travellers including EU citizens stands in contravention of Schengen and the free movement principle. ** A second challenge concerns EU democratic rule of law. Current pressures calling for an urgent adoption of measures like the EU PNR challenge the scrutiny roles held by the European Parliament and the Court of Justice of the European Union on counterterrorism measures in a post-Lisbon Treaty setting. // The paper proposes that the EU adopts a new European Agenda on Security and Liberty based on an EU security (criminal justice-led) cooperation model firmly anchored in current EU legal principles and rule of law standards. This model would call for ‘less is more’ concerning the use, processing and retention of data by police and intelligence communities, and it would instead pursue better and more accurate use of data that would meet the quality standards of evidence in criminal judicial proceedings</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics / Political Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security and defense</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Penal Policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brouwer, Evelien</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carrera, Sergio</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guild, Elspeth</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guittet, Emmanuel-Pierre</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeandesboz, Julien</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ragazzi, Francesco</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scherrer, Amandine</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scherrer, Felix</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Central and Eastern European Online Library</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033245322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=982527</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047862740 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:18:17Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:23:24Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9789461384485 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033245322 |
oclc_num | 1302327272 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 21) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Bigo, Didier Verfasser aut № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris Brussels [Belgium] CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies 2015 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2015 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 21) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier This paper examines the EU counterterrorism policy responses to the attacks in Paris, 7-9 January 2015. It provides an overview of the main EU-level initiatives that have been put forward in the weeks following the events and that will be discussed in the informal European Council meeting of 12 February 2015. The paper argues that a majority of these proposals predated the Paris shootings and had until that point proved contentious as regards their efficacy, legitimacy and lawfulness. A case in point is the EU Passenger Name Record (PNR) proposal. The paper finds that EU counterterrorism policy responses to the Paris events raise two fundamental challenges: ** A first challenge is to the freedom of movement, Schengen and Union citizenship. The priority given to the expansion in the use of large-scale surveillance and systematic monitoring of all travellers including EU citizens stands in contravention of Schengen and the free movement principle. ** A second challenge concerns EU democratic rule of law. Current pressures calling for an urgent adoption of measures like the EU PNR challenge the scrutiny roles held by the European Parliament and the Court of Justice of the European Union on counterterrorism measures in a post-Lisbon Treaty setting. // The paper proposes that the EU adopts a new European Agenda on Security and Liberty based on an EU security (criminal justice-led) cooperation model firmly anchored in current EU legal principles and rule of law standards. This model would call for ‘less is more’ concerning the use, processing and retention of data by police and intelligence communities, and it would instead pursue better and more accurate use of data that would meet the quality standards of evidence in criminal judicial proceedings Politics / Political Sciences Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Criminal Law Security and defense Penal Policy Brouwer, Evelien aut Carrera, Sergio aut Guild, Elspeth aut Guittet, Emmanuel-Pierre aut Jeandesboz, Julien aut Ragazzi, Francesco aut Scherrer, Amandine aut Scherrer, Felix aut Central and Eastern European Online Library Sonstige oth |
spellingShingle | Bigo, Didier Brouwer, Evelien Carrera, Sergio Guild, Elspeth Guittet, Emmanuel-Pierre Jeandesboz, Julien Ragazzi, Francesco Scherrer, Amandine Scherrer, Felix № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris Politics / Political Sciences Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Criminal Law Security and defense Penal Policy |
title | № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris |
title_auth | № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris |
title_exact_search | № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris |
title_exact_search_txtP | № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris |
title_full | № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris |
title_fullStr | № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris |
title_full_unstemmed | № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris |
title_short | № 81 THE EU COUNTER-TERRORISM POLICY. Responses to the Attacks in Paris |
title_sort | № 81 the eu counter terrorism policy responses to the attacks in paris |
topic | Politics / Political Sciences Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Criminal Law Security and defense Penal Policy |
topic_facet | Politics / Political Sciences Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Criminal Law Security and defense Penal Policy |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bigodidier 81theeucounterterrorismpolicyresponsestotheattacksinparis AT brouwerevelien 81theeucounterterrorismpolicyresponsestotheattacksinparis AT carrerasergio 81theeucounterterrorismpolicyresponsestotheattacksinparis AT guildelspeth 81theeucounterterrorismpolicyresponsestotheattacksinparis AT guittetemmanuelpierre 81theeucounterterrorismpolicyresponsestotheattacksinparis AT jeandesbozjulien 81theeucounterterrorismpolicyresponsestotheattacksinparis AT ragazzifrancesco 81theeucounterterrorismpolicyresponsestotheattacksinparis AT scherreramandine 81theeucounterterrorismpolicyresponsestotheattacksinparis AT scherrerfelix 81theeucounterterrorismpolicyresponsestotheattacksinparis AT centralandeasterneuropeanonlinelibrary 81theeucounterterrorismpolicyresponsestotheattacksinparis |