The Politics of Population in Brazil: Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand
The population of Brazil increased tenfold, from 10 to over 100 million, between 1880 and 1980, nearly half of this increase occurring since the end of World War II. The Politics of Population in Brazil examines the attitudes toward population planning of Brazilian government officials and other eli...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Austin
University of Texas Press
[2021]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | DE-1046 DE-1043 DE-858 DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
Zusammenfassung: | The population of Brazil increased tenfold, from 10 to over 100 million, between 1880 and 1980, nearly half of this increase occurring since the end of World War II. The Politics of Population in Brazil examines the attitudes toward population planning of Brazilian government officials and other elites-bishops, politicians, labor leaders, and business owners-in comparison with mass public opinion. The authors' findings that elites seriously underestimate the desire for family planning services, while the public views birth control as a basic issue, represent an important contribution on a timely issue. A major reason for this disparity is that the elites tend to define the issue as a matter of national power and collective growth, and the public sees it as a bread-and-butter question affecting the daily lives of families. McDonough and DeSouza document not only the real gulf between elite and mass opinion but also the propensity of the elites to exaggerate this gap through their stereotyping of public opinion as conservative and disinterested in family planning. Despite these differences, the authors demonstrate that population planning is less conflict ridden than many other controversies in Brazilian politics and probably more amenable to piecemeal bargaining than some earlier studies suggest. In part, this is because attitudes on the issue are not closely identified with opinions regarding left-versus-right disputes. In addition, for the public in general, religious sentiment affects attitudes toward family planning only indirectly. This separation, which reflects the historical lack of penetration of Brazilian society on the part of the church, further attenuates the issue's potential for galvanizing deep-seated antagonisms. As the authors note, this situation stands in contrast to the fierce debates that moral issues have generated in Spain and Ireland. The study is noteworthy not only for its original approach-the incorporation of mass and elite data and the departure from the standard concerns with fertility determinants in population-but also for its sophisticated methodology and lucid presentation |
Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Nov 2021) |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource |
ISBN: | 9781477301388 |
DOI: | 10.7560/764668 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047641365 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211215s2021 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781477301388 |9 978-1-4773-0138-8 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.7560/764668 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9781477301388 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1289764871 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047641365 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-1043 |a DE-1046 |a DE-858 |a DE-859 |a DE-860 |a DE-473 |a DE-739 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 304.660981 | |
100 | 1 | |a McDonough, Peter |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Politics of Population in Brazil |b Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand |c Amaury DeSouza, Peter McDonough |
264 | 1 | |a Austin |b University of Texas Press |c [2021] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 1981 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Nov 2021) | ||
520 | |a The population of Brazil increased tenfold, from 10 to over 100 million, between 1880 and 1980, nearly half of this increase occurring since the end of World War II. The Politics of Population in Brazil examines the attitudes toward population planning of Brazilian government officials and other elites-bishops, politicians, labor leaders, and business owners-in comparison with mass public opinion. The authors' findings that elites seriously underestimate the desire for family planning services, while the public views birth control as a basic issue, represent an important contribution on a timely issue. A major reason for this disparity is that the elites tend to define the issue as a matter of national power and collective growth, and the public sees it as a bread-and-butter question affecting the daily lives of families. | ||
520 | |a McDonough and DeSouza document not only the real gulf between elite and mass opinion but also the propensity of the elites to exaggerate this gap through their stereotyping of public opinion as conservative and disinterested in family planning. Despite these differences, the authors demonstrate that population planning is less conflict ridden than many other controversies in Brazilian politics and probably more amenable to piecemeal bargaining than some earlier studies suggest. In part, this is because attitudes on the issue are not closely identified with opinions regarding left-versus-right disputes. In addition, for the public in general, religious sentiment affects attitudes toward family planning only indirectly. This separation, which reflects the historical lack of penetration of Brazilian society on the part of the church, further attenuates the issue's potential for galvanizing deep-seated antagonisms. | ||
520 | |a As the authors note, this situation stands in contrast to the fierce debates that moral issues have generated in Spain and Ireland. The study is noteworthy not only for its original approach-the incorporation of mass and elite data and the departure from the standard concerns with fertility determinants in population-but also for its sophisticated methodology and lucid presentation | ||
546 | |a In English | ||
650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Social Policy |2 bisacsh | |
700 | 1 | |a DeSouza, Amaury |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.7560/764668 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033025568 | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7560/764668 |l DE-1046 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7560/764668 |l DE-1043 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7560/764668 |l DE-858 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7560/764668 |l DE-859 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7560/764668 |l DE-860 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7560/764668 |l DE-739 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7560/764668 |l DE-473 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1824507903354077184 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | McDonough, Peter |
author_facet | McDonough, Peter |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | McDonough, Peter |
author_variant | p m pm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047641365 |
collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9781477301388 (OCoLC)1289764871 (DE-599)BVBBV047641365 |
dewey-full | 304.660981 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 304 - Factors affecting social behavior |
dewey-raw | 304.660981 |
dewey-search | 304.660981 |
dewey-sort | 3304.660981 |
dewey-tens | 300 - Social sciences |
discipline | Soziologie |
discipline_str_mv | Soziologie |
doi_str_mv | 10.7560/764668 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047641365</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">211215s2021 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781477301388</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4773-0138-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.7560/764668</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9781477301388</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1289764871</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047641365</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">304.660981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McDonough, Peter</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Politics of Population in Brazil</subfield><subfield code="b">Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand</subfield><subfield code="c">Amaury DeSouza, Peter McDonough</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Austin</subfield><subfield code="b">University of Texas Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 1981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Nov 2021)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The population of Brazil increased tenfold, from 10 to over 100 million, between 1880 and 1980, nearly half of this increase occurring since the end of World War II. The Politics of Population in Brazil examines the attitudes toward population planning of Brazilian government officials and other elites-bishops, politicians, labor leaders, and business owners-in comparison with mass public opinion. The authors' findings that elites seriously underestimate the desire for family planning services, while the public views birth control as a basic issue, represent an important contribution on a timely issue. A major reason for this disparity is that the elites tend to define the issue as a matter of national power and collective growth, and the public sees it as a bread-and-butter question affecting the daily lives of families.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McDonough and DeSouza document not only the real gulf between elite and mass opinion but also the propensity of the elites to exaggerate this gap through their stereotyping of public opinion as conservative and disinterested in family planning. Despite these differences, the authors demonstrate that population planning is less conflict ridden than many other controversies in Brazilian politics and probably more amenable to piecemeal bargaining than some earlier studies suggest. In part, this is because attitudes on the issue are not closely identified with opinions regarding left-versus-right disputes. In addition, for the public in general, religious sentiment affects attitudes toward family planning only indirectly. This separation, which reflects the historical lack of penetration of Brazilian society on the part of the church, further attenuates the issue's potential for galvanizing deep-seated antagonisms.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As the authors note, this situation stands in contrast to the fierce debates that moral issues have generated in Spain and Ireland. The study is noteworthy not only for its original approach-the incorporation of mass and elite data and the departure from the standard concerns with fertility determinants in population-but also for its sophisticated methodology and lucid presentation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Social Policy</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DeSouza, Amaury</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7560/764668</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033025568</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7560/764668</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7560/764668</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7560/764668</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7560/764668</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7560/764668</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7560/764668</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7560/764668</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047641365 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T18:47:53Z |
indexdate | 2025-02-19T17:32:07Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781477301388 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033025568 |
oclc_num | 1289764871 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-1043 DE-1046 DE-858 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 |
owner_facet | DE-1043 DE-1046 DE-858 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource |
psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG |
publishDate | 2021 |
publishDateSearch | 2021 |
publishDateSort | 2021 |
publisher | University of Texas Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | McDonough, Peter Verfasser aut The Politics of Population in Brazil Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand Amaury DeSouza, Peter McDonough Austin University of Texas Press [2021] © 1981 1 Online-Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Nov 2021) The population of Brazil increased tenfold, from 10 to over 100 million, between 1880 and 1980, nearly half of this increase occurring since the end of World War II. The Politics of Population in Brazil examines the attitudes toward population planning of Brazilian government officials and other elites-bishops, politicians, labor leaders, and business owners-in comparison with mass public opinion. The authors' findings that elites seriously underestimate the desire for family planning services, while the public views birth control as a basic issue, represent an important contribution on a timely issue. A major reason for this disparity is that the elites tend to define the issue as a matter of national power and collective growth, and the public sees it as a bread-and-butter question affecting the daily lives of families. McDonough and DeSouza document not only the real gulf between elite and mass opinion but also the propensity of the elites to exaggerate this gap through their stereotyping of public opinion as conservative and disinterested in family planning. Despite these differences, the authors demonstrate that population planning is less conflict ridden than many other controversies in Brazilian politics and probably more amenable to piecemeal bargaining than some earlier studies suggest. In part, this is because attitudes on the issue are not closely identified with opinions regarding left-versus-right disputes. In addition, for the public in general, religious sentiment affects attitudes toward family planning only indirectly. This separation, which reflects the historical lack of penetration of Brazilian society on the part of the church, further attenuates the issue's potential for galvanizing deep-seated antagonisms. As the authors note, this situation stands in contrast to the fierce debates that moral issues have generated in Spain and Ireland. The study is noteworthy not only for its original approach-the incorporation of mass and elite data and the departure from the standard concerns with fertility determinants in population-but also for its sophisticated methodology and lucid presentation In English POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Social Policy bisacsh DeSouza, Amaury Sonstige oth https://doi.org/10.7560/764668 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | McDonough, Peter The Politics of Population in Brazil Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Social Policy bisacsh |
title | The Politics of Population in Brazil Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand |
title_auth | The Politics of Population in Brazil Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand |
title_exact_search | The Politics of Population in Brazil Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand |
title_exact_search_txtP | The Politics of Population in Brazil Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand |
title_full | The Politics of Population in Brazil Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand Amaury DeSouza, Peter McDonough |
title_fullStr | The Politics of Population in Brazil Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand Amaury DeSouza, Peter McDonough |
title_full_unstemmed | The Politics of Population in Brazil Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand Amaury DeSouza, Peter McDonough |
title_short | The Politics of Population in Brazil |
title_sort | the politics of population in brazil elite ambivalence and public demand |
title_sub | Elite Ambivalence and Public Demand |
topic | POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Social Policy bisacsh |
topic_facet | POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Social Policy |
url | https://doi.org/10.7560/764668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcdonoughpeter thepoliticsofpopulationinbrazileliteambivalenceandpublicdemand AT desouzaamaury thepoliticsofpopulationinbrazileliteambivalenceandpublicdemand |