Consensual incapacity to marry:
The anthropology that supports marriage perceives justice to be a particular reality, and for this reason marriage will always be a subject of law and of great interest to jurists and sociologists alike. With respect to the realization of justice in marriage, understood as the moment the bond is cre...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
South Bend, Indiana
Saint Augustine's Press
2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | The anthropology that supports marriage perceives justice to be a particular reality, and for this reason marriage will always be a subject of law and of great interest to jurists and sociologists alike. With respect to the realization of justice in marriage, understood as the moment the bond is created, Catholic ecclesiology and canon law articulate an original legal category--namely, the consensual incapacity to marry. In the last fifty years, however, and despite the juridical innovations provided by the current Code of Canon Law promulgated in 1983, American canonical practice in the sphere of marriage law has lost its foundation. The consequences of this include mechanisms of judgment that are rendered incoherent although not inactive, particularly in local tribunals reviewing claims of marriage nullity. In other words, the application of law in the Catholic Church moves forward without a clear indication of its anthropological basis. Canon law, then, on the issue of marriage is perceived to be purposefully oppressive or absolutely meaningless.Jurists, scholars, and members of the Roman Curia acknowledge that, more than a general response to this crisis of law and marriage, what might be needed most is greater scrutiny of the canon in which the formula for consensual incapacity appears. It is furthermore acknowledged that American canonical practice is perhaps the most influential in the world, and is responsible for shaping and sustaining the global attention given to this issue. To fully grasp the crisis and the best way forward, a profile of this canon in American jurisprudence is fundamental and demanded presently. The new course charted by canonical studies and formation of jurists, as well as the new developments in ecclesiastical legislation, will find guidance in this study provided by Catherine Godfrey-Howell, and further insight in the foreword given by the American Cardinal prelate and former Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke. |
| Beschreibung: | Oktober 2021 |
| Beschreibung: | 418 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781587311345 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047491503 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20220228 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 210930s2020 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781587311345 |c hbk. |9 978-1-58731-134-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1302309968 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1742237835 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-19 | ||
| 084 | |a BR 5270 |0 (DE-625)15922: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Godfrey-Howell, Catherine |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Consensual incapacity to marry |c Catherine Godfrey-Howell ; foreword by Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke |
| 264 | 1 | |a South Bend, Indiana |b Saint Augustine's Press |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 418 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Oktober 2021 | ||
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c Pontificia Universitas Sanctae Crucis |d 2020 |g partim edita | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The anthropology that supports marriage perceives justice to be a particular reality, and for this reason marriage will always be a subject of law and of great interest to jurists and sociologists alike. With respect to the realization of justice in marriage, understood as the moment the bond is created, Catholic ecclesiology and canon law articulate an original legal category--namely, the consensual incapacity to marry. In the last fifty years, however, and despite the juridical innovations provided by the current Code of Canon Law promulgated in 1983, American canonical practice in the sphere of marriage law has lost its foundation. The consequences of this include mechanisms of judgment that are rendered incoherent although not inactive, particularly in local tribunals reviewing claims of marriage nullity. In other words, the application of law in the Catholic Church moves forward without a clear indication of its anthropological basis. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Canon law, then, on the issue of marriage is perceived to be purposefully oppressive or absolutely meaningless.Jurists, scholars, and members of the Roman Curia acknowledge that, more than a general response to this crisis of law and marriage, what might be needed most is greater scrutiny of the canon in which the formula for consensual incapacity appears. It is furthermore acknowledged that American canonical practice is perhaps the most influential in the world, and is responsible for shaping and sustaining the global attention given to this issue. To fully grasp the crisis and the best way forward, a profile of this canon in American jurisprudence is fundamental and demanded presently. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a The new course charted by canonical studies and formation of jurists, as well as the new developments in ecclesiastical legislation, will find guidance in this study provided by Catherine Godfrey-Howell, and further insight in the foreword given by the American Cardinal prelate and former Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke. | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Marriage (Canon law) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Marriage / Religious aspects / Catholic Church | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Burke, Raymond L. |d 1948- |0 (DE-588)1032144165 |4 wpr | |
| 751 | |a South Bend, Ind. |0 (DE-588)4118740-4 |2 gnd |4 uvp | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032892773 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182817117044736 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Godfrey-Howell, Catherine |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1032144165 |
| author_facet | Godfrey-Howell, Catherine |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Godfrey-Howell, Catherine |
| author_variant | c g h cgh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047491503 |
| classification_rvk | BR 5270 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1302309968 (DE-599)KXP1742237835 |
| discipline | Theologie / Religionswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Theologie / Religionswissenschaften |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03277nam a2200385 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047491503</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220228 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210930s2020 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781587311345</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-58731-134-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1302309968</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1742237835</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BR 5270</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)15922:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Godfrey-Howell, Catherine</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Consensual incapacity to marry</subfield><subfield code="c">Catherine Godfrey-Howell ; foreword by Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">South Bend, Indiana</subfield><subfield code="b">Saint Augustine's Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">418 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oktober 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">Pontificia Universitas Sanctae Crucis</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">partim edita</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The anthropology that supports marriage perceives justice to be a particular reality, and for this reason marriage will always be a subject of law and of great interest to jurists and sociologists alike. With respect to the realization of justice in marriage, understood as the moment the bond is created, Catholic ecclesiology and canon law articulate an original legal category--namely, the consensual incapacity to marry. In the last fifty years, however, and despite the juridical innovations provided by the current Code of Canon Law promulgated in 1983, American canonical practice in the sphere of marriage law has lost its foundation. The consequences of this include mechanisms of judgment that are rendered incoherent although not inactive, particularly in local tribunals reviewing claims of marriage nullity. In other words, the application of law in the Catholic Church moves forward without a clear indication of its anthropological basis. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Canon law, then, on the issue of marriage is perceived to be purposefully oppressive or absolutely meaningless.Jurists, scholars, and members of the Roman Curia acknowledge that, more than a general response to this crisis of law and marriage, what might be needed most is greater scrutiny of the canon in which the formula for consensual incapacity appears. It is furthermore acknowledged that American canonical practice is perhaps the most influential in the world, and is responsible for shaping and sustaining the global attention given to this issue. To fully grasp the crisis and the best way forward, a profile of this canon in American jurisprudence is fundamental and demanded presently. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The new course charted by canonical studies and formation of jurists, as well as the new developments in ecclesiastical legislation, will find guidance in this study provided by Catherine Godfrey-Howell, and further insight in the foreword given by the American Cardinal prelate and former Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Marriage (Canon law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Marriage / Religious aspects / Catholic Church</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Burke, Raymond L.</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1032144165</subfield><subfield code="4">wpr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="751" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">South Bend, Ind.</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4118740-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="4">uvp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032892773</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV047491503 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T18:15:38Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:13:34Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781587311345 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032892773 |
| oclc_num | 1302309968 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 418 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Saint Augustine's Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Godfrey-Howell, Catherine aut Consensual incapacity to marry Catherine Godfrey-Howell ; foreword by Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke South Bend, Indiana Saint Augustine's Press 2020 418 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Oktober 2021 Dissertation Pontificia Universitas Sanctae Crucis 2020 partim edita The anthropology that supports marriage perceives justice to be a particular reality, and for this reason marriage will always be a subject of law and of great interest to jurists and sociologists alike. With respect to the realization of justice in marriage, understood as the moment the bond is created, Catholic ecclesiology and canon law articulate an original legal category--namely, the consensual incapacity to marry. In the last fifty years, however, and despite the juridical innovations provided by the current Code of Canon Law promulgated in 1983, American canonical practice in the sphere of marriage law has lost its foundation. The consequences of this include mechanisms of judgment that are rendered incoherent although not inactive, particularly in local tribunals reviewing claims of marriage nullity. In other words, the application of law in the Catholic Church moves forward without a clear indication of its anthropological basis. Canon law, then, on the issue of marriage is perceived to be purposefully oppressive or absolutely meaningless.Jurists, scholars, and members of the Roman Curia acknowledge that, more than a general response to this crisis of law and marriage, what might be needed most is greater scrutiny of the canon in which the formula for consensual incapacity appears. It is furthermore acknowledged that American canonical practice is perhaps the most influential in the world, and is responsible for shaping and sustaining the global attention given to this issue. To fully grasp the crisis and the best way forward, a profile of this canon in American jurisprudence is fundamental and demanded presently. The new course charted by canonical studies and formation of jurists, as well as the new developments in ecclesiastical legislation, will find guidance in this study provided by Catherine Godfrey-Howell, and further insight in the foreword given by the American Cardinal prelate and former Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke. Marriage (Canon law) Marriage / Religious aspects / Catholic Church (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Burke, Raymond L. 1948- (DE-588)1032144165 wpr South Bend, Ind. (DE-588)4118740-4 gnd uvp |
| spellingShingle | Godfrey-Howell, Catherine Consensual incapacity to marry |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Consensual incapacity to marry |
| title_auth | Consensual incapacity to marry |
| title_exact_search | Consensual incapacity to marry |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Consensual incapacity to marry |
| title_full | Consensual incapacity to marry Catherine Godfrey-Howell ; foreword by Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke |
| title_fullStr | Consensual incapacity to marry Catherine Godfrey-Howell ; foreword by Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke |
| title_full_unstemmed | Consensual incapacity to marry Catherine Godfrey-Howell ; foreword by Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke |
| title_short | Consensual incapacity to marry |
| title_sort | consensual incapacity to marry |
| topic_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT godfreyhowellcatherine consensualincapacitytomarry AT burkeraymondl consensualincapacitytomarry |