Relating the gospels: imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis
This volume examines the synoptic problem and argues that the similarities between the gospels of Matthew and Luke outweigh the objections commonly raised against the theory that Luke used the text of Matthew in composing his gospel. While agreeing with scholars who suggests that memory played a lea...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
London
T&T Clark
2021
|
Ausgabe: | First edition |
Schriftenreihe: | The library of New Testament studies
592 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | This volume examines the synoptic problem and argues that the similarities between the gospels of Matthew and Luke outweigh the objections commonly raised against the theory that Luke used the text of Matthew in composing his gospel. While agreeing with scholars who suggests that memory played a leading role in ancient source-utilization, Eric Eve argues for a more flexible understanding of memory, which would both explain Luke’s access of Matthew’s double tradition material out of the sequence in which it appears in Matthew, and suggest that Luke may have been more influenced by Matthew’s order than appears on the surface. Eve also considers the widespread ancient practice of literary imitation as another mode of source utilization the Evangelists, particularly Luke, could have employed, and argues that Luke’s Gospel should be seen in part as an emulation of Matthew’s. Within this enlarged understanding of how ancient authors could utilize their sources, Luke’s proposed use of Matthew alongside Mark becomes entirely plausible, and Eve concludes that the Farrer Hypothesis of Matthew using Mark, and Luke consequently using both gospels, to be the most likely solution to the Synoptic Problem. |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 247 Seiten) |
ISBN: | 9780567681126 9780567681119 |
DOI: | 10.5040/9780567681126 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047271791 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20210616 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210505s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780567681126 |9 978-0-5676-8112-6 | ||
020 | |a 9780567681119 |9 978-0-5676-8111-9 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.5040/9780567681126 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-162-BIS)9780567681126 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1252706172 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KEP062313061 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a BC 7550 |0 (DE-625)9683: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Eve, Eric |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1081629614 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Relating the gospels |b imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis |c Eric Eve |
250 | |a First edition | ||
264 | 1 | |a London |b T&T Clark |c 2021 | |
264 | 2 | |a London |b Bloomsbury Publishing | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 247 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a The library of New Testament studies |v 592 | |
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
520 | 3 | |a This volume examines the synoptic problem and argues that the similarities between the gospels of Matthew and Luke outweigh the objections commonly raised against the theory that Luke used the text of Matthew in composing his gospel. While agreeing with scholars who suggests that memory played a leading role in ancient source-utilization, Eric Eve argues for a more flexible understanding of memory, which would both explain Luke’s access of Matthew’s double tradition material out of the sequence in which it appears in Matthew, and suggest that Luke may have been more influenced by Matthew’s order than appears on the surface. Eve also considers the widespread ancient practice of literary imitation as another mode of source utilization the Evangelists, particularly Luke, could have employed, and argues that Luke’s Gospel should be seen in part as an emulation of Matthew’s. Within this enlarged understanding of how ancient authors could utilize their sources, Luke’s proposed use of Matthew alongside Mark becomes entirely plausible, and Eve concludes that the Farrer Hypothesis of Matthew using Mark, and Luke consequently using both gospels, to be the most likely solution to the Synoptic Problem. | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Synoptische Frage |0 (DE-588)4124278-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Zweiquellentheorie |0 (DE-588)4191254-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
653 | |a Bible / Gospels / Criticism, interpretation, etc | ||
653 | 0 | |a Synoptic problem | |
653 | 0 | |a Biblical studies & exegesis | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Synoptische Frage |0 (DE-588)4124278-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Zweiquellentheorie |0 (DE-588)4191254-8 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-0-5676-8110-2 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567681126?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-162-BIS | ||
940 | 1 | |q ZDB-162-BIS21 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032675479 | ||
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567681126?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections |l BSB01 |p ZDB-162-BIS |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804182430518607872 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Eve, Eric |
author_GND | (DE-588)1081629614 |
author_facet | Eve, Eric |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Eve, Eric |
author_variant | e e ee |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047271791 |
classification_rvk | BC 7550 |
collection | ZDB-162-BIS |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-162-BIS)9780567681126 (OCoLC)1252706172 (DE-599)KEP062313061 |
discipline | Theologie / Religionswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Theologie / Religionswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.5040/9780567681126 |
edition | First edition |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03210nmm a2200517 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047271791</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210616 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210505s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780567681126</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-5676-8112-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780567681119</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-5676-8111-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5040/9780567681126</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-162-BIS)9780567681126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1252706172</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP062313061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BC 7550</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)9683:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eve, Eric</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1081629614</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Relating the gospels</subfield><subfield code="b">imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis</subfield><subfield code="c">Eric Eve</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London</subfield><subfield code="b">T&T Clark</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">London</subfield><subfield code="b">Bloomsbury Publishing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (viii, 247 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The library of New Testament studies</subfield><subfield code="v">592</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This volume examines the synoptic problem and argues that the similarities between the gospels of Matthew and Luke outweigh the objections commonly raised against the theory that Luke used the text of Matthew in composing his gospel. While agreeing with scholars who suggests that memory played a leading role in ancient source-utilization, Eric Eve argues for a more flexible understanding of memory, which would both explain Luke’s access of Matthew’s double tradition material out of the sequence in which it appears in Matthew, and suggest that Luke may have been more influenced by Matthew’s order than appears on the surface. Eve also considers the widespread ancient practice of literary imitation as another mode of source utilization the Evangelists, particularly Luke, could have employed, and argues that Luke’s Gospel should be seen in part as an emulation of Matthew’s. Within this enlarged understanding of how ancient authors could utilize their sources, Luke’s proposed use of Matthew alongside Mark becomes entirely plausible, and Eve concludes that the Farrer Hypothesis of Matthew using Mark, and Luke consequently using both gospels, to be the most likely solution to the Synoptic Problem.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Synoptische Frage</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124278-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zweiquellentheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191254-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bible / Gospels / Criticism, interpretation, etc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Synoptic problem</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biblical studies & exegesis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Synoptische Frage</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124278-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Zweiquellentheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191254-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-5676-8110-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567681126?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-162-BIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">ZDB-162-BIS21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032675479</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567681126?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-162-BIS</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047271791 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T17:14:29Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:07:26Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780567681126 9780567681119 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032675479 |
oclc_num | 1252706172 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 247 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-162-BIS ZDB-162-BIS21 |
publishDate | 2021 |
publishDateSearch | 2021 |
publishDateSort | 2021 |
publisher | T&T Clark |
record_format | marc |
series2 | The library of New Testament studies |
spelling | Eve, Eric Verfasser (DE-588)1081629614 aut Relating the gospels imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis Eric Eve First edition London T&T Clark 2021 London Bloomsbury Publishing 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 247 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The library of New Testament studies 592 Includes bibliographical references and index This volume examines the synoptic problem and argues that the similarities between the gospels of Matthew and Luke outweigh the objections commonly raised against the theory that Luke used the text of Matthew in composing his gospel. While agreeing with scholars who suggests that memory played a leading role in ancient source-utilization, Eric Eve argues for a more flexible understanding of memory, which would both explain Luke’s access of Matthew’s double tradition material out of the sequence in which it appears in Matthew, and suggest that Luke may have been more influenced by Matthew’s order than appears on the surface. Eve also considers the widespread ancient practice of literary imitation as another mode of source utilization the Evangelists, particularly Luke, could have employed, and argues that Luke’s Gospel should be seen in part as an emulation of Matthew’s. Within this enlarged understanding of how ancient authors could utilize their sources, Luke’s proposed use of Matthew alongside Mark becomes entirely plausible, and Eve concludes that the Farrer Hypothesis of Matthew using Mark, and Luke consequently using both gospels, to be the most likely solution to the Synoptic Problem. Synoptische Frage (DE-588)4124278-6 gnd rswk-swf Zweiquellentheorie (DE-588)4191254-8 gnd rswk-swf Bible / Gospels / Criticism, interpretation, etc Synoptic problem Biblical studies & exegesis Synoptische Frage (DE-588)4124278-6 s Zweiquellentheorie (DE-588)4191254-8 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-0-5676-8110-2 https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567681126?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Eve, Eric Relating the gospels imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis Synoptische Frage (DE-588)4124278-6 gnd Zweiquellentheorie (DE-588)4191254-8 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4124278-6 (DE-588)4191254-8 |
title | Relating the gospels imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis |
title_auth | Relating the gospels imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis |
title_exact_search | Relating the gospels imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis |
title_exact_search_txtP | Relating the gospels imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis |
title_full | Relating the gospels imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis Eric Eve |
title_fullStr | Relating the gospels imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis Eric Eve |
title_full_unstemmed | Relating the gospels imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis Eric Eve |
title_short | Relating the gospels |
title_sort | relating the gospels imitation memory and the farrer hypothesis |
title_sub | imitation, memory, and the Farrer hypothesis |
topic | Synoptische Frage (DE-588)4124278-6 gnd Zweiquellentheorie (DE-588)4191254-8 gnd |
topic_facet | Synoptische Frage Zweiquellentheorie |
url | https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567681126?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eveeric relatingthegospelsimitationmemoryandthefarrerhypothesis |