Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives

Political scientists often ask themselves what might have been if history had unfolded differently: if Stalin had been ousted as General Party Secretary or if the United States had not dropped the bomb on Japan. Although scholars sometimes scoff at applying hypothetical reasoning to world politics,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Belkin, Aaron (Contributor, Editor), Breslauer, George (Contributor), Cederman, Lars (Contributor), Dawes, Robyn (Contributor), Deibert, Ronald (Contributor), Fearon, James (Contributor), Fischerkeller, Michael (Contributor), Herrmann, Richard (Contributor), Jervis, Robert 1940-2021 (Contributor), Khong, Yuen (Contributor), Kiser, Edgar (Contributor), Lebow, Richard (Contributor), Levi, Margaret (Contributor), Mesquita, Bruce (Contributor), Olson, James (Contributor), Roese, Neal (Contributor), Russett, Bruce (Contributor), Stein, Janice (Contributor), Tetlock, Philip E. (Editor), Tetlock, Philip (Contributor)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press [2021]
Subjects:
Online Access:DE-1043
DE-1046
DE-858
DE-859
DE-860
DE-473
DE-739
Volltext
Summary:Political scientists often ask themselves what might have been if history had unfolded differently: if Stalin had been ousted as General Party Secretary or if the United States had not dropped the bomb on Japan. Although scholars sometimes scoff at applying hypothetical reasoning to world politics, the contributors to this volume--including James Fearon, Richard Lebow, Margaret Levi, Bruce Russett, and Barry Weingast--find such counterfactual conjectures not only useful, but necessary for drawing causal inferences from historical data. Given the importance of counterfactuals, it is perhaps surprising that we lack standards for evaluating them. To fill this gap, Philip Tetlock and Aaron Belkin propose a set of criteria for distinguishing plausible from implausible counterfactual conjectures across a wide range of applications. The contributors to this volume make use of these and other criteria to evaluate counterfactuals that emerge in diverse methodological contexts including comparative case studies, game theory, and statistical analysis. Taken together, these essays go a long way toward establishing a more nuanced and rigorous framework for assessing counterfactual arguments about world politics in particular and about the social sciences more broadly
Item Description:Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 25. Feb 2021)
Physical Description:1 online resource (344 pages) 8 tables 16 line illus
ISBN:9780691215075
DOI:10.1515/9780691215075

There is no print copy available.

Interlibrary loan Place Request Caution: Not in THWS collection! Get full text