Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives

Political scientists often ask themselves what might have been if history had unfolded differently: if Stalin had been ousted as General Party Secretary or if the United States had not dropped the bomb on Japan. Although scholars sometimes scoff at applying hypothetical reasoning to world politics,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Weitere Verfasser: Belkin, Aaron (MitwirkendeR, HerausgeberIn), Breslauer, George (MitwirkendeR), Cederman, Lars (MitwirkendeR), Dawes, Robyn (MitwirkendeR), Deibert, Ronald (MitwirkendeR), Fearon, James (MitwirkendeR), Fischerkeller, Michael (MitwirkendeR), Herrmann, Richard (MitwirkendeR), Jervis, Robert 1940-2021 (MitwirkendeR), Khong, Yuen (MitwirkendeR), Kiser, Edgar (MitwirkendeR), Lebow, Richard (MitwirkendeR), Levi, Margaret (MitwirkendeR), Mesquita, Bruce (MitwirkendeR), Olson, James (MitwirkendeR), Roese, Neal (MitwirkendeR), Russett, Bruce (MitwirkendeR), Stein, Janice (MitwirkendeR), Tetlock, Philip E. (HerausgeberIn), Tetlock, Philip (MitwirkendeR)
Format: Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press [2021]
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:FAB01
FAW01
FCO01
FHA01
FKE01
FLA01
UBG01
UPA01
Volltext
Zusammenfassung:Political scientists often ask themselves what might have been if history had unfolded differently: if Stalin had been ousted as General Party Secretary or if the United States had not dropped the bomb on Japan. Although scholars sometimes scoff at applying hypothetical reasoning to world politics, the contributors to this volume--including James Fearon, Richard Lebow, Margaret Levi, Bruce Russett, and Barry Weingast--find such counterfactual conjectures not only useful, but necessary for drawing causal inferences from historical data. Given the importance of counterfactuals, it is perhaps surprising that we lack standards for evaluating them. To fill this gap, Philip Tetlock and Aaron Belkin propose a set of criteria for distinguishing plausible from implausible counterfactual conjectures across a wide range of applications. The contributors to this volume make use of these and other criteria to evaluate counterfactuals that emerge in diverse methodological contexts including comparative case studies, game theory, and statistical analysis. Taken together, these essays go a long way toward establishing a more nuanced and rigorous framework for assessing counterfactual arguments about world politics in particular and about the social sciences more broadly
Beschreibung:Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 25. Feb 2021)
Beschreibung:1 online resource (344 pages) 8 tables 16 line illus
ISBN:9780691215075
DOI:10.1515/9780691215075

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Fernleihe Bestellen Achtung: Nicht im THWS-Bestand! Volltext öffnen