O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici:
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
Beograd
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
2019
|
| Series: | Edicija O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o ---
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Item Description: | Literaturverzeichnis Seite 150-183 |
| Physical Description: | 183 Seiten Illustrationen |
| ISBN: | 9788680484273 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047021920 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 201120s2019 a||| |||| 00||| srp d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788680484273 |9 978-86-80484-27-3 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1224010684 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047021920 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Krstić, Predrag |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici |c Predrag Krstić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Beograd |b Univerzitet u Beogradu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju |c 2019 | |
| 300 | |a 183 Seiten |b Illustrationen | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Edicija O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o --- | |
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis Seite 150-183 | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Philosophische Anthropologie |0 (DE-588)4045798-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kritik |0 (DE-588)4033229-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kritik |0 (DE-588)4033229-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Philosophische Anthropologie |0 (DE-588)4045798-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032429376&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032429376&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20201120 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032429376 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 001.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4971 |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804181987574939648 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Sadržaj Ol OfRov 02 ReGeNerisanje 03 EKStaza 04 OdBRana 05 PreSudA 06 ZakLon 07 DislokAcija 08 OfPreManje 09 AmBiValencija 10 EsTEtika Ո TranSformaGja 12 UmOVanje 13 NeDoUmenje 14 UTeraTura
O kritici Korišćena dela „Kritikovati i kritika: definicije pojmova“ (2018): https:// www.znacenjereci.com/kritikovati-kritika-definicije-pojmova/ (pristupljeno 1. avgusta 2018). „Self-criticism“ (2018): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Self-criticism (pristupljeno 1. avgusta 2018). Adorno/Theodor W. (1973), Philosophische Terminolo gie, tom I, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997a), „Wozu noch Philosophie“, u: Eingriffe. Neun kritische Modelle, Gesammelte Schrif ten, tom 10.2, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 459-473. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997b), Negative Dialektik, Ge sammelte Schriften, tom 6, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997c), Minima Moralia: Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben, Gesammelte Schriften, tom 4, Frankfiirt/M.: Suhrkamp. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997d), „Die Aktualität der Phi losophie“, u: Philosophische Frühschriften, Gesammelte Schriften, tom 1, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 325-344. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997e), „Erziehung nach Auschwitz“, u: Stichworte. Kritische Modelle 2, Gesammelte Schriften, tom 10.2, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 674-690. 150
14 Literatura Adorno, Theodor W. (1997Ѓ), „Beitrag zur Ideologienle hre“, u: Soziologische Schriften I, Gesammelte Schriften, tom 8, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, տէր. 457-477. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997g), „Kritik“, u: Stichworte. Kritische Modelle 3, Gesammelte Schriften, tom 10.2, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, տէր. 785-793. Adorno, Theodor. W. (1997h), „Parataxis: Zur späten Lyrik Hölderlins“, u: Noten zur Literatur, Gesammel te Schriften, tom 11, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 447-492. Alembert, Jean le Rond ď (1772), „Essai sur les éléments de philosophie, ou sur les principes des connoissances hu maines“, Mélanges de littérature, d’histoire, et dephilosop hie, tom 4, Amsterdam: Arkstée et Merkus: http://bks6. books.google.d/books?id=SzOHAAAAQAAJ printsec=frontcover hl=pt-PT source=gbs_ge_summary_r cad=0#v=onepage q f=false (pristupljeno 12. jula 2006). Alembert, Jean Le Rond ď (2006 [1752]), Essai sur la société des gens de lettres et des grands: sur la réputation, sur les mécènes et sur les récompenses littéraires, Loverval: Université populaire. Althusser, Louis (2010), Ideologie und ideologische Staat sapparate, Hamburg: VSA. Anderson, Joel (2011), „Situating Axel Honneth in the Frankfurt School Tradition“, u: Danielle Petherbridge (prir.), Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, Leiden: Brill, str. 31-57. Arent, Hana (2016), Conditio humana, Beograd: Fedon. 151
Badimi, Alain (2001), Ethics: An Essay on the Under standing ofEvil, London: Verso. Baker, Keith (1990), „Public Opinion as Political Invention“, u: Keith Baker, Inventing the French Revolu tion: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, str. 167-199. Barad, Karen (2003), „Posthumanist Performativity: Towards an Understanding of How Matters Comes To Matter“, Signs 28 (3): 801-831. Barruel, Augustin de (1803), Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire dujacobinisme, tom 1, Hambourg: P. Fauche: https://archive.org/stream/mmoirespours03barr/mmoirespours03barr_djvu.txt (pristupljeno 2. marta 2018). Bayle, Pierre (1692), Projet etfragmens d’un dictionaire critique, Rotterdam: Reinier Leers: http://books.google. rs/books?id=uflUAAAAQAAJ printsec=frontcover dq=Bayle,+Projet+et+fragmens hl=sr sa=X ei=kiELUduZJ8jntQaYqIHQCw ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA (pristupljeno 12. jula 2010). Bayle, Pierre (1820 [1697]), Dictionnaire historique et critique, Paris: Desoer: http://ia700307.us.archive.org// load_djvu_applet.php?file=30/items/dictionnairehis40unkngoog/dictionnairehis40unkngoog.djvu (pri stupljeno 1. maja 2008). Benjamin, Valter (1974), Eseji, Beograd: Noht. Berk, Edmund (2001 [1790]), Razmišljanja о Revoluciji и Francuskoj, Beograd: „Filip Višnjić“.
14 Literatura Berlin, Isaiah (1973), „The Counter-Enlightenment“, u: Philip Wiener (prir.), Dictionary ofthe History ofIdeas, tom 2, New York: Scribner, str. 100-112. Berlin, Isaiah (1991),,Joseph de Maistre and the Origins of Fascism“, u: The Crooked Timber ofHumanity, Lon don: Fontana Press, str. 91-174. Berlin, Isaiah (2000), Three Critics ofthe Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder, London: Pimlico. Berlin, Isaiah (2002), Freedom and Its Betrayal: Six Ene mies ofHuman Liberty, Henry Hardy (prir.), London: Chatto Windus. Berlin, Isaija (2006), Koreni romantizma, Beograd: Službeni glasnik. Bernstein, Richard J. (2010), The Pragmatic Turn, Cam bridge: Polity Press. Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2015), Connected Sociologies, London: Bloomsbury. Bielefeldt, Heiner (2003), Symbolic Representation in Kanťs Practical Philosophy, West Nyack: Cambridge University Press. Bietenholz, Peter G. (1994), Historia and Fabula: Myths and Legends in Historical Thoughtfrom Antiquity to The Modern Age, Leiden: Brill. . Blake, William (1826-1827), „Laocoön“: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Laocoon_(Blake) (pristupljeno 12. maja 2011). 153
Blejk, Vilijām (2007), Izabrana dela, Beograd: Plato. Bloch, Emst (1981), Princip nada, tom 1-3, Zagreb: Naprijed. Böhme, Hartmut Gernot Böhme (1996), „The Batde of Reason with the Imagination“, u: James Schmidt (prir.), What Is Enlightenment?Eighteenth-Century An swers and Twentieth-Century Questions, Berkeley: Univer sity of California Press, str. 426-452. Boltanski, Luc (2011), On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation, Cambridge: Polity Press. Borowski, Ludwig Ernst (1993 [1804]), „Darstellung des Lebens und Charakters Immanuel Kants“, u: Felix Groß (prir.), Immanuel Elánt. Sein Leben in Darstellungen von Zeitgenossen, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellsc haft, str. 1-102. Bourdieu, Pierre (1990),/« Other Words: Essays Toward a. Reflective Sociology, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Bourdieu, Pierre (1991), Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bowie, Andrew (1997), From Romanticism to Critical Theory. The Philosophy of German Literary Theory, Lon don: Roudedge. Brucker, Johann Jakob (1742-1744), Historia critica philosophiae, Leipzig: Breitkopf: http://books.google.rs/ books?id=epHNAAAAMAAJ hl=sr source=gbs_similarbooks (pristupljeno 15. decembra 2006). Buchner, Hartmut (1965), „Hegel und das Kritisches Journal der Philosophie“, Hegel-Studien 3: 95-156.
14 Literatura Buhle, J. G., (1790), Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Encyklopädie der Wissenschaften, Lemgo: Meyer. Butler, Judith (2005), Giving an Account of Oneself, New York: Fordham University Press. Butler, Judith, Ernesto Laclau Slavoj Žižek (2000), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Lefi, New York: Verso. Batler, Džudit (2018), „Šta je kritika? Ogled o Fukoovoj vrlini“, u: Adriana Zaharijević Predrag Krstić (prir.), Šta je kritika?, Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, str. 93-134. Cambridge Dictionary (2018): https://dictionary. cambridge.org/dictionary/english/criticism (pristupljeno 9. jula 2018). Camcastle, Cara, (2005), More Moderate Side ofJoseph de Maistre: Views on Political Liberty and. Political Eco nomy, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Cassedy, Steven (1990), Flightfrom Eden: The Origins ofModem Literary Criticism and Theory, Los Angeles: University of California Press. Dahner, Helmut (1988), „O genealogiji kritike“, Filozof ska istraživanja 8 (3): 841-848. Deleuze, Gilles (1977), „Nomad Thought“, u: David В. Allison (prir.) The New Nietzsche: Contemporary Styles of Interpretation, New York: Dell, str. 142-149. 155
Deleuze, Gilles (2011), Spinoza:praktičnafilozofija, Zagreb: Demetra. Delež, Žil (1999), Niče іfilozofija, Beograd: Plato. Delež, Žil (2009), Razlika іponavljanje, Beograd: Fedőn. Delež, Žil (2014), Spinoza іproblem izraza, Beograd: Fedőn. Delež, Žil (2015), Kantova kritickajüozofija, Beograd: Fedőn. Deligiorgi, Katerina (2005), Kant and the Culture ofEn lightenment, Albany: State University of New York Press. Deranty, Jean-Philippe (2011), „Reflective Critical Theory: A Systematic Reconstruction of Axel Honneth’s Social Philosophy“, u: Danielle Petherbridge (prir.), Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, Leiden: Brill, str. 59-88. Derrida, Jacques (1979), Spurs: Nietzsche’s Styles, Chica go: University of Chicago Press. Derrida, Jacques (1988), Istina u slikarstvu, Sarajevo: Svjedost. Derrida, Jacques (1992), The Other Heading: Reflections on Today’s Europe, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Derrida, Jacques (1993), Aporias, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Derida, Žak (2002), Kosmopditike, Beograd: Stubovi kulture. Diderot, Denis (1751-1765a), „Art“, u: L’Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers·. http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/L%E2%80%99Encyclop%C3%A9die/Volume_l#ART_Autorite_pol.pdf (pristupljeno 1. oktobra 2010).
14 Literatura Diderot, Denis (1751-1765b), „Éclectisme“, u: L’Encyc lopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers·. https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/L%E2%80%99En- cyclop%C3%A9die/lre_%C3%A9dition/ECLECTISME (pristupljeno 3. novembra 2009). Diderot, Denis (1875-1877 [1765]), „Salon de 1765“, Oeuvres complètes de Diderot, tom 10, Paris: J. Glaye, str. 227-454, http://ia600400.us.archive.org//load_djvu_ applet.php?file=14/items/oeuvrescompltesl 1 Ounkngoog/oeuvrescompltesllOunkngoog.djvu (pristupljeno 3. aprila 2010). Didro, Deni (1964), Oporeklu іprirodi lepoga, Beograd: Rad. Dickson, Gwen (1995),Johann Georg Hamanns Relatio nal Metacriticism, Berlin: De Gruyter. Dolohijn, Rick Iris van der Tuin (2012), New Mate rialism: Interviews and Cartographies, Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press. Duncker, Christian (2006), Kritische Reflexionen des Ideologiebegriffes. Zur Bedeutung der Ideologienfür den Menschen, London: Turnshare. Edelman, Gerald (2004), Enlightenment and the Intelle ctual Foundations ofModem Culture, New Haven: Yale University Press. Eisler, Rudolf (1910), Wörterbuch der Philosophischen Begriffe, tom 1, Berlin: Mittler und Sohn: https://archive. org/stream/wrterbuchderphOleisluoft/wrterbuchderph01eisluoft_djvu.txt (pristupljeno 7. maja 2009). 157
Engels, Friedrich Karl Marx (1974 [1845]), Die baliğe Familie oder Kritik der kritischen Kritik Gegen Bruno Bauer und Kunsorten, u: Werke, tom 2, Berlin: Dietz, str. 3-223. Felski, Rita (2015), The Limits of Critique, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fontius, Martin (1986), „Critique“, u: Rolf Reichardt Eberhard Schmitt (prir.), Handbuch politisch-sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich 1680-1820, tom 5, Münc hen: Oldenbourg, str. 7-26. Foucault, Michel (1984), „Truth and Power“, u: Paul Ra binów (prir.), The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books, str. 51-75. Foucault, Michel (1997), „On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress“, u: Paul Rabinów (prir.), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, New York: The New Press, str. 253-280. Foucault, Michel (2002), „Questions of Method“, u: James Faubion (prir.), Power: Essential Works ofFoucault, 1954-1984, tom 3, London: Penguin, str. 223-238. Fuko, Misel Žerar Role (1984), „Strukturalizam i poststrukturalizam“, Trećiprogram 60 (1): 152-176. Fuko, Mišel (1988a), „Nietzsche, Freud, Marx“, u: Obrad Savič (prir.), Filozofsko čitanje Frojda, Beograd: ПС SSOS, str. 389-397. Fuko, Mišel (1988b), Istorija seksualnosti·, staranje о sebi, Beograd: Prosveta.
14 Literatura Fakó, Misel (1995), „Stajeprosvetiteljstvo?“, Trećiprogram 102 (2): 232-244. Fuko, Misei (2003), Hermeneutika subjekta, Novi Sád: Svetovi. Fuko, Misel (2004), „Niče, genealogija, istorija“, Gradac 152-153: 54-66. Fuko, Misel (2007), Poredak diskursa, Ložnica: Karpos. Fuko, Misel (2018), „Staje kritika?“, u: Adriana Zaharijevič Predrag Krstič (prir.), Sta je kritika?, Novi Sad: Aka demska knjiga, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, str. 35-91. Frank, Manfred (1989), Einführung in diefrühromantis che Ästhetik, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Frank, Manfred (2004), The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism, New York: State University of New York Press. Fraser, Nancy (2003), „Distorted Beyond All Recogni tion: A Rejoinder to Axel Honneth“, u: Nancy Fraser Axel Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition: A Politi cal-Philosophical Exchange, London: Verso, տէր. 198-236. Frei, Hans W. ( 1980), The Eclipse ofBiblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneuti cs, London: Yale University Press. Funkenstein, Amos (2007), Theology and The Scientific Im aginationfrom the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge: International Society for Science and Religion. 159
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1978), Istina i metoda: osnovi filozofske hermeneutike, Sarajevo: „Veselin Masleša“. Gardner, Helen (1959), The Business of Criticism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Garrard, Graeme (2001), Joseph de Maistre and Carl Schmitt“, u: Richard A. Lebrun (prir),Joseph de Maistre’s Life, Thought, and Influence, Montreal: McGi11-Queen’s University Press, str. 220-238. Garard, Greim (2011), Protivprosvetiteljstva: od osamna estog veka do danas, Banja Luka: Vidici. Gaše, Rodolf (1987a), „Dekonstrukcija kao kritika I“, Književna kritikais (5): 91-108. Gáže, Rodolf (1987b), „Dekonstrukcija kao kritika II“, Književna kritika!^ (6): 107-121. Goethe Schiller (1796), „Xenien“: http://www. digbib.org/Friedrich_von_Schiller_1759/Xenien (pristupljeno 14. marta 2018). Gorz, André (1990), Kritik der ökonomischen Vernunft: Sinnfragen amFndedlerĀrbeitsgesellschaft, Berlin: Rotbuch. Habermas, Jirgen (1975), Saznanje Unteres, Beograd: Noht. Habermas, Jürgen (1981), „Filozofija kao namesnik і tumač“, Filozofska istraživanja 4/5: 59-69. Habermas, Jürgen (1982), „Čemu još filozofija“, u: Josip Brkič (prir.), Čemu još filozofija, Zagreb: Centar za kul turnu djelatnost, տէր. 59-71.
14 Literatura Habermas, Jürgen (1986), Tehnika і znanost kao „ideolo gija“, Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Habermas, Jürgen (1988a), Filozofski diskurs moderne, Zagreb: Globus. Habermas, Jirgen (1988b),,Jedinstvo uma u mnoštvu njegovih glasova“, Gledišta 3-4: 253-266. Habermas, Jirgen (1988c), „Modernost - jedan necelo viti projekat“, u: Milan Damnjanović Emina Kulenović-Grujić (prir.), Umetnost iprogres, Beograd: „Književne novine“, str. 28-37. Habermas, Juergen (1997a), Theorie des kommunikati ven Handelns, tom 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellsc haftliche Rationalisierung, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Habermas, Juergen (1997b), Theorie des kommunikati ven Handelns, tom 2: Zur Kritik derfunktionalistischen Vernunft, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Habermas, Jürgen (1998), On the Pragmatics of Commu nication, M. Cooke (prir.), Cambridge: MIT Press. Habermas, Jirgern (2002a), „Metafizika posle Kanta“, u: Postmetafizičko mišljenje: Filozofski članci, Beograd: Časopis Beogradski krug, str. 18-37. Habermas, Jirgen (2002b), „Filozofija i nauka kao knji ževnost“, u: Postmetafizičko mišljenje: Filozofski članci, Beograd: Časopis Beogradski krug, str. 267-290. Habermas, Jirgen (2012),Javno mnjenje: istraživanje u oblastijedne kategorije građanskog društva, Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing. 161
Hajdeger, Martin (2000), „Čemu pesnici?“, u: Šumski putevi, Beograd: Plato, str. 209-253. Hamann, Johann Georg (1996 [1784]), „Metacritique on the Purism of Reason“, u: James Schmidt (prir.), What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, Berkeley: University of California Press, str. 154-167. Hamann, Johann Georg (2007 [1760]), „Aesthetica in Nuce“, u: Writings on Philosophy and Language, Kenneth Haynes (prir.), New York: Cambridge Universi ty Press, str. 60-95. Hamilton, Alastair (1999), TheApocryphalApocalypse: The Reception of The Second Book ofEsdras (4 Ezra)from The Renaissante to the Enlightenment, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970a), „Aufklärung - Wirkenwollen durch Verstand“, u: Frühe Schrißen, Werke, tom I, Frankfiirt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 21-33. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970b), „Glauben und Wissen oder die Reflexionsphilosophie der Subjektivität in derVollständigkeit ihrer Formen als Kantische, Jacobische und Fichtesche Philosophie“, u:Jenaer Schrißen, Werke, tom II, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 287-301. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970c), Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, Werke, tom XII, Frankfbrt/M.: Suhrkamp. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970d), Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion П, Werke, tom XVII, Frankfmt/M.: Suhrkamp. Hegel, G . W. F. (1970e), Phänomenologie des Geistes, Werke, tom III, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
14 Literatura Hegel, G. W. F. (1970Ѓ), Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie Ш, Werke, tom XX, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970g), „Kritisches Journal der Philosop hie. Einleitung. Über das Wesen der philosophischen Kritik überhaupt und ihr Verhältnis zum gegenwärtigen Zustand der Philosophie insbesondere“, u:Jenaer Schriften, Werke, tom П, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 171-187. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970h), „Das älteste Systemprogramm des deutschen Idealismus“, u: Frühe Schriften, Werke, tom I, Frankfiirt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 234-236. Helderlin, Fridrih (1969), Odabrana dela, Beograd: Nolit. Herder, Johann Gottfried (1799), Eine Metakritik zur Kri tik der reinen Vernunft, Frankfort und Leipzig: bez oznake izdavača: http://ia600500.us.archive.Org//load_djvu_applet. php?ffle=19/items/einemetakridkz01herdgoog/einemetakritikz01herdgoog.djvu (pristupljeno 23. maja 2010). Hill, R. Kevin (2005), Nietzsche’s Critiques: The Kantian Foundations ofhis Thought, Oxford: Clarendon. Hobsbawm, Eric (1987), Doba revolucije, Evropa 1789-1848, Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Horinan, Amos (1988), „The Origins of the Theory of the Philosphe Conspiracy“, French History 2 (2): 152-172. Holbah, Pol (1950 [1770]), Sistem prirode ili о zakonima fizičkog i moralnog sveta, Beograd: Prosveta. Honneth, Axel (1985a), „An Aversion Against the Uni versal: A Commentary on Lyotard’s Postmodern Condi tion“, Theory, Culture Society 2 (3): 147-156. 163
Honneth, Axel (1985b), Kritik derMacht; Reflexionsstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie, Franfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Honneth, Axel (1994), Desintegration. Bruchstücke einer soziologischen Zeitdiagnose, Frankfurt/M.: Fischer. Honneth, Axel (1995a), The Strugglefor Recognition; The Moral Grammar ofSocial Conflicts, Cambridge: The MIT Press. Honneth, Axel (1995b), „A Fragmented World: On the Implicit Relevance of Lukács’ Early Work“, u: Axel Honneth, The Fragmented World ofthe Social; Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, Charles W. Wright (prir.), Albany: SUNY, str. 50-60. Honneth, Axel (2003), „Redistribution as Recognition: A Response to Nancy Fraser“, u: Nancy Fraser Axel Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition: A Political-Phi losophical Exchange, London, Verso, str. 110-197. Honneth, Axel (2004), „A Social Pathology of Reason: On the Intellectual Legacy of Critical Theory“, u: Fred Rush (prir.), The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theo ry, New York: Cambridge University Press, str. 336-360. Honneth, Axel (2007), „The Social Dynamics of Disres pect: On the Location of Critical Theory Today“, u: Axel Honneth, Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press, str. 63-79. Honneth, Axel (2008), Reification: A New Look atan Old Idea, New York: Oxford University Press. Horkhajmer, Maks (1976), „Tradicionalna i kritička teorija“, u: Tradicionalna i kritička teorija, Beograd: BIGZ, str. 31-81.
14 Literatura Horkheimer, Мах (1972), „Ideologie und Handeln“, u: Kurt Lenk (prir.), Ideologie. Ideologiekritik und Wissenso ziologie, Berlin: Luchterhand, str. 245-252. Horkheimer, Max (1982), „Društvena funkcija filozofi je“, u: Kritička teorija II, Zagreb: Stvarnost, str. 254-270. Horkheimer, Max (1988), Kritām instrumentalnog uma: iz predavanja i zabilježakd nakon svršetka rata, Zagreb: Globus. Horkheimer, Max Theodor Adorno (1997), Dialektik der Aufklärung, Adorno: Gesammelte Schriften, tom 3, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Hoy, David (2004), Critical Resistance: From Poststructu ralism to Post-Critique, Cambridge: MIT Press. Israel, Jonathan (2006), Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation ofMan 1670-1752, New York: Oxford University Press. Ivkovič, Marjan (2017), Kritička teorija Aksela Honeta: ka prevazilaženju metafizike, Beograd: Institut za filozofi ju i društvenu teoriju. Jaumann, Herbert (1995), Critica: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Literaturkritik zwischen Quintilian und Thomasius, Leiden: Brill. Kant, Immanuel (1968a [1781]), Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Gesammelten Schriften, tom 2, Berlin: De Gruyter. 165
Kant, Immanuel (1968b [1784]), „Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?“, u: Gesammelten Schriften, tom 8, Berlin: De Gruyter, տէր. 35-42. Kant, Immanuel (1968c [1786]), „Was heisst: sich im Denken orientiren?“, u: Gesammelten Schriften, tom 8, Berlin: De Gruyter, str. 133-147. Kant, Immanuel (1968d [1800]), Logic, Gesammelten Schriften, tom 9, Berlin: De Gruyter. Kasirer, Ernst (2003), Filozofija prosvetiteljstva, Beograd: Gutenbergova galaksija. Keats, John (2013), Lamia·, http://www.gutenberg.org/ ffles/2490/2490-h/2490-h.htm#link2H_PART2(pristupljeno 14. mart 2018). Kilminster, Richard (2013), „Critique and Overcritique in Sociology“, Human Figurations 2 (2): https://quod. lib.umich.edu/h/humfig/11217607.0002.205/-critique-and-overcritique-in-sociology?rgn=main;view=fulltext (pristupljeno 8. avgust 2018). Kopić, Mario (2018), „Oproštaj od kritike“, u: Žudnja і stremljenje, Zagreb: Matica Hrvatska, str. 49-73. Kozelek, Rajnhart (1997), Kritika i kriza: studija оpato ģenēzi građanskog sveta, Beograd: Plato. Krstić, Predrag (2003), „Prosvećenost“, u: Đorđe Vukadinović Predrag Krstić (prir.), Kritičkipojmovnik civilnog društva, Beograd: Grupa 484, str. 181-231. Krstić, Predrag (2007a), „Negativno prosvetiteljstvo“, Trećiprogram 135-136 (III-IV): 20-42.
14 Literatura Krstić, Predrag (2007b), „Čemu još kritika“, Filozofija i društvo 33 (2): 9-42. Krstić, Predrag, (2010), „Auschwitz, Adorno i posle“, u: Željko Šarić (prir.), Kritička teorija društva, Banja Luka: Udruženje za filozofiju i društvenu misao, str. 9-33. Krstić, Predrag (2015), „Rana konzervativna kritika prosvetiteljstva“, Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka 9 (13): 205-224. Krstić, Predrag (2016a), Strategije odrastanja:prosvečenost i reakcije, Beograd: Službeni glasnik. Krstić, Predrag (2016b), О čemu govorimo kad govo rimo оprosvetiteljstvu, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju. Laclau, Ernesto Chantal Mouffe (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, New York: Verso. Latour, Bruno (2004), „Why Has Critique Run Out Of Steam? From Matters of Fact, to Matters of Concern“, Critical Inquiry 30: 225-248. Le Clerc, Jean (1700 [1697]), Ars critica, tom I-II, Amsterdam: G. Gallet: http://books.google.rs/ books?id=VLUTAAAAQAAJ printsec=frontcover hl=sr source=gbs_ge_summary_r cad=0#v=onepage q f=false (pristupljeno 3. maja 2009). Lenk, Hans (1987), Kritik der kleinen Vernunft: Einführung in diejokologische Philosophie, Frank furt/M.: Suhrkamp. 167
Leontev, Konstantin Nikolayevich (1996), Fostok, Ro ssija i slavyianstvo:filosof.skayia ipolitičeskayia publicistik, Moskva: Respublika. Lessing, Hans Ulrich (1984), Die Idee einer Kritik der historischen Vernunft: Wilhelm Diltheys erkenntnistheore tisch-logisch-methodologische Grundlegung der Geisteswis senschaften, Freiburg: Alber. Lilla, Mark (1993), G. B. Vico: The Making ofan An ti-Modem, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Llobera, Josep (2003), Making of Totalitarian Thought, Oxford: Berg. Lošonc, Mark (2012), „Kritika lajkujućeg uma“, Stvar 3: 93-106. Lowith, Karl (1988), Od Hegela do Nietzscheä, Sarajevo: „Veselin Maslesa“. Lukač, Đerđ (1970), Povijest i klasna svijest, Zagreb: Naprijed. Lyotard, Jean-François (1990), Postmoderna protumače na djeci, Zagreb: August Cesaree. Liotar, Žan-Fransoa (1988), Postmoderno stanje, Novi Sad: Bratstvo-Jedinstvo. Liotar, Žan-Fransoa (1989), „Adorno kao đavo“, Delo 1-2-3:158-174. Liotar, Žan-Fransoa (1991), Raskol, Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižamica Zorana Stojanoviča.
14 Literatura Maistre, Joseph de (1993), St. Petersburg Dialogues: Or Conversations on the Temporal Government ofProvidence, Montreal: McGill-Qtieen’s University Press. Maistre, Joseph de (1996 [ 1796] ), Against Rousseau: „On the State ofNature“ and „On the Sovereignty ofthe People“, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Mestr, Žozef de (2001a), „Razmišljanja o protestantiz mu kroz njegove odnose sa državom (1798)“, u: Spisi о revoluciji, Cačak: Umetničko društvo Gradac, str. 153-169. Mestr, Žozef de (2001b[1797j), „Razmatranja о Fran cuskoj“, u: Spisi о revoluciji, Cačak: Umetničko društvo Gradac, str. 71-152. Mestr, Žozef de (2001c [1793]), „Četvrto pismo jednog savojskog rojaliste svojim sunarodnicima“, u: Spisi о revo luciji, Čačak: Umetničko društvo Gradac, str. 24-55. Mestr, Žozef de (2013 [1821]), О dželatu, Beograd: Službeni glasnik. Manhajm, Karl (1978), Ideologija i utopija, Beograd: Noht. Manuel, Frank E. (1963), The New World ofHenri Sa int-Simon, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Marmontel, Jean-François (1751), „Critique“, u: L’Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers·, http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/L%E2%80%99Encyclop%C3%A9die/Volume_4#CRITIQUE (pristupljeno 12. septembra 2006). 169
Marx, Karl Friedrich Engels (1985), „Njemačka ide ologija“, u: Karl Marx Friedrich Engels, Rani radovi, Zagreb: Naprijed, str. 355-428. Marx, Karl (1985a), „Prilog jevrejskom pitanju“, u: Karl Marx Friedrich Engels, Rani radovi, Zagreb: Naprijed, str. 54-89. Karl Marx (1985b), „Pismo Arnoldu Rugeu. Kreuzna ch, septembar 1843“, u: Karl Marx Friedrich Engels, Rani radovi, Naprijed, Zagreb, str. 50-53. Mattessich, Stefan (2008), „Self-Critical Theory: Dis cursive Strategies in an Era of Real Universality“, New Literary History 39 (2): 301-320. McMahon, Darrin M. (2001), Enemies ofthe Enlighten ment: The French Counter-Enlightenment and the Ma king ofModernity, New York: Oxford University Press. Meier, Heinrich (1988), The Lesson of Carl Schmitt, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Mišić, Dr Vladimir (2018), „Konstruktivna і destruktivna kritika“: https://www.vaspsiholog.com/2011/04/konstruktivna-i-destruktivna-kritika/ (pristupljeno 2. avgusta 2018). Mouffe, Chantal (2005), On the Political, New York: Routledge. Neiman, Susan (1994), The Unity ofReason: Rereading Kant, New York: Oxford University Press. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1967a),Jenseits von Gut und Böse, Krititsche Gesamtausgabe, tom 6.2, Berlin: De Gruyter.
14 Literatura Nietzsche, Friedrich (1967b), Nachgelassenefragmente Anfang 1888 - Anfangjanuar 1889, Kritische Gesam tausgabe, tom 8.3, Berlin: De Gruyter. Nizbet, Robert (1995), „Konzervativizam“, Trećipro gram 101:275-322. , Novalis (1967), „Fragmenti“, U: Zoran Gluščević (prir.), Romantizam, Cetinje: Obod, str. 61-77. Oxford Living Dictionaries (2017), https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/defmition/critique (pristupljeno 9. jula 2018). Peri, Marvin (2000), Intelektualna istorija Evrope, Beo grad: Clio. Petherbridge, Danielle (2011), „Introduction: Axel Honneth’s Project of Critical Theory“, u: Danielle Petherbridge (prir.), Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, Leiden: Brill, str. 1-30. Pope, Alexander (1801), An Essay on Criticism: with Expla natory Notes / Versuch über die Kritik, Vienna: R. Sammer. Popkin, Richard Henry (1994), „Spinoza and Bible Scholarship“, u: James E. Force Richard Henry Popkin (prir.), The Books ofNature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands ofSpinoza ’s Time and the British Isles of Newton’s Time, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, str. 1-20. Porter, Roy (2008), Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation ofthe Modem World, London: Penguin. 1Л
Poulouin, Claudine (1998), Le temps des origines: l’Eden, le Déluge et „les temps reculésde Pascal à „L’Encyclopé die“, Paris: H. Champion. Prakash, Gyan (1999), Another Reason: Science and the Imagination in Modem India, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pranchere, Jean-Yves (2001a),,Joseph de Maistre’s Catholic Philosophy of Authority“, u: Richard Lebrun {prir.),Joseph de Maistre’s Life, Thought and Influence: Selected Studies, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, տէր. 131-152. Pranchere, Jean-Yves (2001b), „The Persistence of Ma isalan Thought“, u: Richard Lebrun (prìr.),Joseph de Maistre’s Life, Thought and Influence: Seleđed Studies, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, str. 290-325. Rajič, Jovan (2002), Istorija slovenskih naroda, Novi Sad: Matica srpska, Orfeus. Rebughini, Paola (2018), „Critical Agency and The Future of Critique“, Current Sociology 66 (1): 3-19. Reijen, Willem van (1986), Philosophie als Kritik. Einführung in die Kritische Theorie, Königstein/T.: Athenäum. Riker, Pol (2010), О tumačenju: ogled o Frojdu, Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
14 Literatura Robinson, John (2014), Proofs ofa Conspiracy: Against all the Religions and Governments ofEurope, carried on in the Secret Meetings ofFree Masons, Illuminati and Reading Societies՝, http://www.gutenberg.org/ files/47605/47605-h/47605-h.htm (pristupljeno 2. decembra 2017). Rorty, Amelie Oksenberg (prir.) (2003), The Many Faces ofPhilosophy: Reflectionsfrom Plato to Arendt, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rorty, Richard (1988), „The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy“, u: Merrill D. Peterson Robert C. Vaug han (prir.), The Virginia Statute ofReligious Freedom: Its Evolution and Consequences in American History, Cam bridge: Cambridge University Press, str. 381-402. Rorty, Richard (1990), Filozofija і ogledalo prirode, Sara jevo: „Veselin Masleša“. Rorty, Richard (1995), Kontingencija, ironija і solidar nost, Zagreb: Naprijed. Rorty, Richard (2001), „The Continuity between the Enlightenment and ’Postmodernism’“, u: Keith Baker Peter Reill (prir.), What’s Left ofEnlightenment? A Postmodern Question, Stanford: Stanford University Press, str. 19-36. Rorty, Richard (2007a), „Pragmatism as Romantic Polytheism“, u: Philosophy As Cultural Politics, Philosop hical Papers, tom 4, New York: Cambridge University Press, str. 27-41. 173
Rorty, Richard (2007b), „Pragmatism and Romanti cism“, u: Philosophy As Cultural Politics, Philosophical Papers, tom 4, New York: Cambridge University Press, str. 105-11?. Rorti, Ričard (1992), Konsekvencepragmatizma, Beo grad: Nolit. Rorti, Ričard (2004), „Propast izbaviteljske istine і uspon književne kulture“, Trećiprogram 123-124(3-4): 139-158. Rozanov, Vasily Vasilyevich (1990 [1899]), Sumerki prosveshcheniya. Sbomik stateipo voprosamobrazovania, Moskva: Pedagogika. Sartr, Žan-Pol (1983), Kritika dijalektičkog uma, Izabra na dela, tom 11-12, Beograd: Nolit. Saul, Nicholas (2002), „The Pursuit of the Subject: Lite rature as Critic and Perfecter of Philosophy 1790-1830“, u: Nicholas Saul (prir.), Philosophy and German Literatu re, 1700-1990, West Nyack: Cambridge University Press, str. 57-101. Schelgel, Friedrich (1971), Lucindeand the Fragments, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ŠIegel, Fridrih (1999a), „Fragmenti Liceum“, u: Ironija ljubavi: (izbor iz dela), Beograd: Zepter, str. 5-22. Šlegel, Fridrih (1999b), „Fragmenti Ateneum“, u: Ironija ljubavi: (izbor iz dela), Beograd: Zepter, str. 24-105.
14 Literatura Šlegel, Fridrih (1999c), „Fragmenti Ideje“, u: Ironija ljubavi: (izbor iz dela), Beograd: Zepter, str. 106-122. Schelling, F. W. J. (1986 [1800]), Sistem transcendental nog idealizma, Zagreb: Naprijed. Schmitt, Carl (1976), The Concept ofthe Political, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Schmitt, Carl (1986), Political Romanticism, London: MIT Press. Schmitt, Carl (1988), Political Theology, London: MIT Press. Shelley, Percy Bysshe (1821), Defence ofPoetry·, http:// rpo.library.utoronto.ca/content/defence-poetry-part-fi rst-1821 (pristupljeno 12. februara 2010). Sioran, Emil (2001), „Žozef de Mestr. Esej o reakcionar noj misli“, u: Žozef de Mestr, Spisi о revoluciji, Čačak: Umetničko društvo Gradac, str. 173-204. Skerlić, Jovan (1907-1926), Pisci i knjige, tom 1-9, Beo grad: Nova štamparija „Davidović“, Geca Kon. Sloterdajk, Peter (1991), Tetoviram život, Gornji Milanovac: Dečje novine. Sloterdajk, Peter (2000a), „Kritička teorija je mrtva“, Reč 57(3): 207-212. Sloterdajk, Peter (2000b), „Pravila za ljudski vrt: odgo vor na Hajdegerovo pismo o humanizmu“, Reč Ы (3): 187-202. 175
Sloterdijk, Peter (1988): Kopernikanska mobilizacija і ptolomejsko razoružanje: ogled iz estetike, Novi Sad: Bratstvo-Jedinstvo. Sloterdijk, Peter (1992), Kritika ciničkoga uma, Zagreb: Globus. Solzhenicin, Alexander (1995 [1978]), „Reč na Garva de“, u: Publicistika v treh tomah, tom 1, Moskva: Verh.Volž, str, 309-328. Sorokin, Pitirim (1957), Social and Cultural Dynamics, Boston: Porter Sargent. Spinoza, Baruh de (1957 [1670]), Teološko politički trak tat, Beograd: Kultura. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1988), „Сап Subaltern Speak?“, u: Cary Nelson Lawrence Grossberg (prir.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Basingstoke : Macmillan, str. 271-313. Spivak, Gajatri Čakravorti (2003), Kritika postkolonijalnog urna, Beograd: Beogradski krug. Stefanovič, Mirjana (2009), Leksikon srpskogprosvetiteljstva, Beograd: Službeni glasnik. Sturma, Dieter (2005), „Politics and the New Mytho logy: the Turn to Late Romanticism“, u: Karl Ameriks (prir.), The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, New York: Cambridge University Press, str. 219-238. Tojnbi, Arnold (1970), Istraživanje istorije, tom 1-2, Beograd: Prosveta.
14 Literatura Tokvil, Aleksis de (1990), O demokratiji и Amend, Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojano viča, Titograd: CID. Vattimo, Gianni (1990), „Postmodern Criticism: Pos tmodern Critique“, u: David Wood (prir.), Writing the Future, London: Routledge, տէր. 57-66. Velmer, Albreht (1987), Prilog dijalektici modernei postmoderne. Kritika uma posle Adorna, Novi Sad: Bratstvo-Jedinstvo. Voegelin, Eric (1982), From Enlightenment to Revoluti on, Durham: Duke University Press. Volter, Fransoa Mari Arue (1973), Filozofski remik, Novi Sad: Matica srpska. Von Hendy, Andrew (2001), Modem Construction of Myth, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Vraneš, Branko (2015), „Skerličeva kritika modernizma і mentalitet (srpske) književne kritike“, u: Miro Vuksa novič (prirі),Jovan Skerlić danas, Beograd: SANU, str. 145-156. Weber, Max (1949), „The Meaning of’Ethical Neutra lity’“, u: Edward A. Shils Henry A. Finch (prir.), The Methodology ofthe Social Science, New York: Free Press, str. 1-47. Weber, Max (1988), „Debattereden auf der Tagung des Vereins für Sozialpolitik in Wien 1909 zu den Verhand lungen über ’Die wirtschaftlichen Unternehmungen 177
der Gemeinden’“, u: Max Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Soziologie und Sozialpolitik, Marianne Weber (prir.), Tübingen: Mohr, str. 412-416. Veber, Maks (1987), „Racionalizam zapadne kutlure“, u: Mihajlo Durie (prir.), Sociologija Maksa Vebera, Zagreb: Naprijed, str. 290-305. Vaughan, Larry (1989),Johann Georg Hamann: Metap hysics ofLanguage and Vision ofHistory, New York: P. Lang. Weller, Shane (2008), „Literature and the Politics of Madness: On the Twentieth-Century Reception of Frie drich Hölderlin in France and Germany“, Comparative Critical Studies 5:193-206. Zaharijević, Adriana Predrag Krstić (2018), „U čemu je vrlina kritike?“, u: Adriana Zaharijević Predrag Krstić (prir.), Šta je kritika?, Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga, Beo grad: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, str. 7-34. Žižek, Slavoj (1989), The Sublime Object ofIdeology, London: Verso. Žižek, Slavoj (1993), Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique ofIdeology, Durham: Duke Uni versity Press. Žmegač, Viktor (1986), „Razvoj romantičarskog pokreta“, u: Viktor Žmegač (prir.), Njemačka književnost, Zagreb: SNL, str. 86-106.
14 Literatura Korisna dela Alberro, Alexander Blake Stimson (prir.) (2009), Institutional Critique: An Anthology ofArtists’ Writings, Cambridge: MIT Press. Amossy, Ruth (1992), La politique du texte: enjeux socio critiques, Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille. Anderson, Joel Axel Honneth (2005), „Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice“, u: John Christman. Joel Anderson (prir.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays, New York: Cam bridge University Press, str. 127-149. Barthes, Roland (1966), Critique et vérité, Paris: Seuil. Benjamin, Walter (2018), „Zur Kritik der Gewalt / Pri log kritici nasilja“, u: Petar Bojanie (prir.), Benjaminova kritika nasilja:prilozi i komentari, Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, str. 25-103. Birch, David (1991), Language, Literature and Critical Practice: Ways ofAnalysing Text, London: Routledge. Boltanski, Luc Nancy Fraser (2014), Domination et émancipation pour un renouveau dela critique sociale, Lyon: PUL. 179
Dant, Tim (2003), Critical Social Theory: Culture, Society and Critique, London: SAGE. Henrich, Dieter (1987), Konzepte: Essays zur Philosophie in der Zeit, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Dubrovski, Serž (1989), Zašto nova kritika?Kritika і objektivnost, Novi Sad: Književna zajednica Novog Sada. Élissalde, Yvan (2000), Critique de ľinterprétation, Paris: Vrin. Fayolle, Roger (1978y), La critique, Paris: Armand Colin. Gardes Tamine, Joëlle Marie-Claude Hubert (2004), Dictionnaire de critique littéraire, Paris: Armand Colin. Genette, Gérard (1979), „Raisons de la critique pure“, Figures II: 7-22. Honneth, Axel (1995), „The Other ofJustice: Haber mas and the Ethical Challenge of Postmodernism“, u: Stephen K. White (prir.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, New York: Cambridge University Press, str. 289-323. Honneth, Axel (2000), Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit: Aufsätze zurpraktischen Philosophie, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
14 Literatura Kolb, David (1986), The Critique ofPure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger and After, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Kriger, Mari (1982), Teorija kritike, Beograd: Nolit. Kubok, Dariusz (prir.) (2018), Thinking Critically: What Does It Mean? The Tradition ofPhilosophical Criticism and Its Forms in the European History ofIdeas, Berlin: De Gruyter. Lauševič, Savo (1995), Filosofskipojam kritike, Nikšić: Unireks. Margolin, Victor (prir.) (1989), Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Matovič, Vesna (1990), „Vidovi društveno angažované kritičke misli u srpskoj književnosti 1868-1914 , Književ na istorija 22 (83/84): 99-105. Mitrinović-Olečikus, Dimitrije (1988), „Stvaralačka kritika“, Delo 34 (9/10): 259-265; Milič, Novica (1982), Antinomife kritike, Novi Sad: Matica srpska. Musil, Robert (1981), Kritik, Reinbek/H.: Rowohlt. Pirie, David В. ( 1992), How to write Critical Essays: A Guidefor Students ofLiterature, London: Routledge. 181
Prohić, Kasim (1988), Filozofska i umjetnička kritika, Sarajevo: Svjetlost, „Veselin Masléša“. Pule, Žorž (1995), Kritička svest, Sremski Karlovci: Izda vačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanoviča. Reboul, J acquette (1986), Critique universitaire et cri tique créatrice, Paris: Amateurs de livres. Rebughini, Paola (2015), „Framing Emancipations“, Journal of Classical Sociology 15 (3): 270-285. Role, Žerar (1989), „Nada і kritika ili sekularizacija po Ernstu Blochu“, Gledišta ЗО (3/4): 58-66. Salmon, Pierre (1976), Histoire et critique: sociologie générale etphilosophie sociale, Bruxelles: Université Libre. Seid, Edvard (1987), „Razmišljanja о američkoj ’Ievoj’ književnoj kritici“, Književna kritika 18 (6): 40-54. Sitter-Liver, Beat (prir.) (2007), Utopie heute I: Zur aktuellen Bedeutung Funktion und Kritik des utopischen Denkens und Vorstellens, Fribourg: Academic Press, Stutt gart: Kohlhammer. Starobinski, Žan (1990), Kritički odnos, Sremski Karlov ci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanoviča. Tilih, Paul (1985), „Kritika i opravdanje utopije”, Knji ževna kritika 16(2): 150-156.
14 Literatura Todorov, Tzvetan (1984), Critique de la critique: un roman d apprentissage, Paris: Seuil. Tompkins, Jane P. (prir.) (1988), Reader-Response Critici sm: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Visković, Velimir (1988), Pozicija kritičara, Zagreb: Znanje.
|
| adam_txt |
Sadržaj Ol OfRov 02 ReGeNerisanje 03 EKStaza 04 OdBRana 05 PreSudA 06 ZakLon 07 DislokAcija 08 OfPreManje 09 AmBiValencija 10 EsTEtika Ո TranSformaGja 12 UmOVanje 13 NeDoUmenje 14 UTeraTura
O kritici Korišćena dela „Kritikovati i kritika: definicije pojmova“ (2018): https:// www.znacenjereci.com/kritikovati-kritika-definicije-pojmova/ (pristupljeno 1. avgusta 2018). „Self-criticism“ (2018): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Self-criticism (pristupljeno 1. avgusta 2018). Adorno/Theodor W. (1973), Philosophische Terminolo gie, tom I, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997a), „Wozu noch Philosophie“, u: Eingriffe. Neun kritische Modelle, Gesammelte Schrif ten, tom 10.2, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 459-473. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997b), Negative Dialektik, Ge sammelte Schriften, tom 6, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997c), Minima Moralia: Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben, Gesammelte Schriften, tom 4, Frankfiirt/M.: Suhrkamp. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997d), „Die Aktualität der Phi losophie“, u: Philosophische Frühschriften, Gesammelte Schriften, tom 1, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 325-344. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997e), „Erziehung nach Auschwitz“, u: Stichworte. Kritische Modelle 2, Gesammelte Schriften, tom 10.2, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 674-690. 150
14 Literatura Adorno, Theodor W. (1997Ѓ), „Beitrag zur Ideologienle hre“, u: Soziologische Schriften I, Gesammelte Schriften, tom 8, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, տէր. 457-477. Adorno, Theodor W. (1997g), „Kritik“, u: Stichworte. Kritische Modelle 3, Gesammelte Schriften, tom 10.2, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, տէր. 785-793. Adorno, Theodor. W. (1997h), „Parataxis: Zur späten Lyrik Hölderlins“, u: Noten zur Literatur, Gesammel te Schriften, tom 11, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 447-492. Alembert, Jean le Rond ď (1772), „Essai sur les éléments de philosophie, ou sur les principes des connoissances hu maines“, Mélanges de littérature, d’histoire, et dephilosop hie, tom 4, Amsterdam: Arkstée et Merkus: http://bks6. books.google.d/books?id=SzOHAAAAQAAJ printsec=frontcover hl=pt-PT source=gbs_ge_summary_r cad=0#v=onepage q f=false (pristupljeno 12. jula 2006). Alembert, Jean Le Rond ď (2006 [1752]), Essai sur la société des gens de lettres et des grands: sur la réputation, sur les mécènes et sur les récompenses littéraires, Loverval: Université populaire. Althusser, Louis (2010), Ideologie und ideologische Staat sapparate, Hamburg: VSA. Anderson, Joel (2011), „Situating Axel Honneth in the Frankfurt School Tradition“, u: Danielle Petherbridge (prir.), Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, Leiden: Brill, str. 31-57. Arent, Hana (2016), Conditio humana, Beograd: Fedon. 151
Badimi, Alain (2001), Ethics: An Essay on the Under standing ofEvil, London: Verso. Baker, Keith (1990), „Public Opinion as Political Invention“, u: Keith Baker, Inventing the French Revolu tion: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, str. 167-199. Barad, Karen (2003), „Posthumanist Performativity: Towards an Understanding of How Matters Comes To Matter“, Signs 28 (3): 801-831. Barruel, Augustin de (1803), Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire dujacobinisme, tom 1, Hambourg: P. Fauche: https://archive.org/stream/mmoirespours03barr/mmoirespours03barr_djvu.txt (pristupljeno 2. marta 2018). Bayle, Pierre (1692), Projet etfragmens d’un dictionaire critique, Rotterdam: Reinier Leers: http://books.google. rs/books?id=uflUAAAAQAAJ printsec=frontcover dq=Bayle,+Projet+et+fragmens hl=sr sa=X ei=kiELUduZJ8jntQaYqIHQCw ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA (pristupljeno 12. jula 2010). Bayle, Pierre (1820 [1697]), Dictionnaire historique et critique, Paris: Desoer: http://ia700307.us.archive.org// load_djvu_applet.php?file=30/items/dictionnairehis40unkngoog/dictionnairehis40unkngoog.djvu (pri stupljeno 1. maja 2008). Benjamin, Valter (1974), Eseji, Beograd: Noht. Berk, Edmund (2001 [1790]), Razmišljanja о Revoluciji и Francuskoj, Beograd: „Filip Višnjić“.
14 Literatura Berlin, Isaiah (1973), „The Counter-Enlightenment“, u: Philip Wiener (prir.), Dictionary ofthe History ofIdeas, tom 2, New York: Scribner, str. 100-112. Berlin, Isaiah (1991),,Joseph de Maistre and the Origins of Fascism“, u: The Crooked Timber ofHumanity, Lon don: Fontana Press, str. 91-174. Berlin, Isaiah (2000), Three Critics ofthe Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder, London: Pimlico. Berlin, Isaiah (2002), Freedom and Its Betrayal: Six Ene mies ofHuman Liberty, Henry Hardy (prir.), London: Chatto Windus. Berlin, Isaija (2006), Koreni romantizma, Beograd: Službeni glasnik. Bernstein, Richard J. (2010), The Pragmatic Turn, Cam bridge: Polity Press. Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2015), Connected Sociologies, London: Bloomsbury. Bielefeldt, Heiner (2003), Symbolic Representation in Kanťs Practical Philosophy, West Nyack: Cambridge University Press. Bietenholz, Peter G. (1994), Historia and Fabula: Myths and Legends in Historical Thoughtfrom Antiquity to The Modern Age, Leiden: Brill. . Blake, William (1826-1827), „Laocoön“: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Laocoon_(Blake) (pristupljeno 12. maja 2011). 153
Blejk, Vilijām (2007), Izabrana dela, Beograd: Plato. Bloch, Emst (1981), Princip nada, tom 1-3, Zagreb: Naprijed. Böhme, Hartmut Gernot Böhme (1996), „The Batde of Reason with the Imagination“, u: James Schmidt (prir.), What Is Enlightenment?Eighteenth-Century An swers and Twentieth-Century Questions, Berkeley: Univer sity of California Press, str. 426-452. Boltanski, Luc (2011), On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation, Cambridge: Polity Press. Borowski, Ludwig Ernst (1993 [1804]), „Darstellung des Lebens und Charakters Immanuel Kants“, u: Felix Groß (prir.), Immanuel Elánt. Sein Leben in Darstellungen von Zeitgenossen, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellsc haft, str. 1-102. Bourdieu, Pierre (1990),/« Other Words: Essays Toward a. Reflective Sociology, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Bourdieu, Pierre (1991), Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bowie, Andrew (1997), From Romanticism to Critical Theory. The Philosophy of German Literary Theory, Lon don: Roudedge. Brucker, Johann Jakob (1742-1744), Historia critica philosophiae, Leipzig: Breitkopf: http://books.google.rs/ books?id=epHNAAAAMAAJ hl=sr source=gbs_similarbooks (pristupljeno 15. decembra 2006). Buchner, Hartmut (1965), „Hegel und das Kritisches Journal der Philosophie“, Hegel-Studien 3: 95-156.
14 Literatura Buhle, J. G., (1790), Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Encyklopädie der Wissenschaften, Lemgo: Meyer. Butler, Judith (2005), Giving an Account of Oneself, New York: Fordham University Press. Butler, Judith, Ernesto Laclau Slavoj Žižek (2000), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Lefi, New York: Verso. Batler, Džudit (2018), „Šta je kritika? Ogled o Fukoovoj vrlini“, u: Adriana Zaharijević Predrag Krstić (prir.), Šta je kritika?, Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, str. 93-134. Cambridge Dictionary (2018): https://dictionary. cambridge.org/dictionary/english/criticism (pristupljeno 9. jula 2018). Camcastle, Cara, (2005), More Moderate Side ofJoseph de Maistre: Views on Political Liberty and. Political Eco nomy, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Cassedy, Steven (1990), Flightfrom Eden: The Origins ofModem Literary Criticism and Theory, Los Angeles: University of California Press. Dahner, Helmut (1988), „O genealogiji kritike“, Filozof ska istraživanja 8 (3): 841-848. Deleuze, Gilles (1977), „Nomad Thought“, u: David В. Allison (prir.) The New Nietzsche: Contemporary Styles of Interpretation, New York: Dell, str. 142-149. 155
Deleuze, Gilles (2011), Spinoza:praktičnafilozofija, Zagreb: Demetra. Delež, Žil (1999), Niče іfilozofija, Beograd: Plato. Delež, Žil (2009), Razlika іponavljanje, Beograd: Fedőn. Delež, Žil (2014), Spinoza іproblem izraza, Beograd: Fedőn. Delež, Žil (2015), Kantova kritickajüozofija, Beograd: Fedőn. Deligiorgi, Katerina (2005), Kant and the Culture ofEn lightenment, Albany: State University of New York Press. Deranty, Jean-Philippe (2011), „Reflective Critical Theory: A Systematic Reconstruction of Axel Honneth’s Social Philosophy“, u: Danielle Petherbridge (prir.), Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, Leiden: Brill, str. 59-88. Derrida, Jacques (1979), Spurs: Nietzsche’s Styles, Chica go: University of Chicago Press. Derrida, Jacques (1988), Istina u slikarstvu, Sarajevo: Svjedost. Derrida, Jacques (1992), The Other Heading: Reflections on Today’s Europe, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Derrida, Jacques (1993), Aporias, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Derida, Žak (2002), Kosmopditike, Beograd: Stubovi kulture. Diderot, Denis (1751-1765a), „Art“, u: L’Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers·. http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/L%E2%80%99Encyclop%C3%A9die/Volume_l#ART_Autorite_pol.pdf (pristupljeno 1. oktobra 2010).
14 Literatura Diderot, Denis (1751-1765b), „Éclectisme“, u: L’Encyc lopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers·. https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/L%E2%80%99En- cyclop%C3%A9die/lre_%C3%A9dition/ECLECTISME (pristupljeno 3. novembra 2009). Diderot, Denis (1875-1877 [1765]), „Salon de 1765“, Oeuvres complètes de Diderot, tom 10, Paris: J. Glaye, str. 227-454, http://ia600400.us.archive.org//load_djvu_ applet.php?file=14/items/oeuvrescompltesl 1 Ounkngoog/oeuvrescompltesllOunkngoog.djvu (pristupljeno 3. aprila 2010). Didro, Deni (1964), Oporeklu іprirodi lepoga, Beograd: Rad. Dickson, Gwen (1995),Johann Georg Hamanns Relatio nal Metacriticism, Berlin: De Gruyter. Dolohijn, Rick Iris van der Tuin (2012), New Mate rialism: Interviews and Cartographies, Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press. Duncker, Christian (2006), Kritische Reflexionen des Ideologiebegriffes. Zur Bedeutung der Ideologienfür den Menschen, London: Turnshare. Edelman, Gerald (2004), Enlightenment and the Intelle ctual Foundations ofModem Culture, New Haven: Yale University Press. Eisler, Rudolf (1910), Wörterbuch der Philosophischen Begriffe, tom 1, Berlin: Mittler und Sohn: https://archive. org/stream/wrterbuchderphOleisluoft/wrterbuchderph01eisluoft_djvu.txt (pristupljeno 7. maja 2009). 157
Engels, Friedrich Karl Marx (1974 [1845]), Die baliğe Familie oder Kritik der kritischen Kritik Gegen Bruno Bauer und Kunsorten, u: Werke, tom 2, Berlin: Dietz, str. 3-223. Felski, Rita (2015), The Limits of Critique, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fontius, Martin (1986), „Critique“, u: Rolf Reichardt Eberhard Schmitt (prir.), Handbuch politisch-sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich 1680-1820, tom 5, Münc hen: Oldenbourg, str. 7-26. Foucault, Michel (1984), „Truth and Power“, u: Paul Ra binów (prir.), The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books, str. 51-75. Foucault, Michel (1997), „On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress“, u: Paul Rabinów (prir.), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, New York: The New Press, str. 253-280. Foucault, Michel (2002), „Questions of Method“, u: James Faubion (prir.), Power: Essential Works ofFoucault, 1954-1984, tom 3, London: Penguin, str. 223-238. Fuko, Misel Žerar Role (1984), „Strukturalizam i poststrukturalizam“, Trećiprogram 60 (1): 152-176. Fuko, Mišel (1988a), „Nietzsche, Freud, Marx“, u: Obrad Savič (prir.), Filozofsko čitanje Frojda, Beograd: ПС SSOS, str. 389-397. Fuko, Mišel (1988b), Istorija seksualnosti·, staranje о sebi, Beograd: Prosveta.
14 Literatura Fakó, Misel (1995), „Stajeprosvetiteljstvo?“, Trećiprogram 102 (2): 232-244. Fuko, Misei (2003), Hermeneutika subjekta, Novi Sád: Svetovi. Fuko, Misel (2004), „Niče, genealogija, istorija“, Gradac 152-153: 54-66. Fuko, Misel (2007), Poredak diskursa, Ložnica: Karpos. Fuko, Misel (2018), „Staje kritika?“, u: Adriana Zaharijevič Predrag Krstič (prir.), Sta je kritika?, Novi Sad: Aka demska knjiga, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, str. 35-91. Frank, Manfred (1989), Einführung in diefrühromantis che Ästhetik, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Frank, Manfred (2004), The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism, New York: State University of New York Press. Fraser, Nancy (2003), „Distorted Beyond All Recogni tion: A Rejoinder to Axel Honneth“, u: Nancy Fraser Axel Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition: A Politi cal-Philosophical Exchange, London: Verso, տէր. 198-236. Frei, Hans W. ( 1980), The Eclipse ofBiblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneuti cs, London: Yale University Press. Funkenstein, Amos (2007), Theology and The Scientific Im aginationfrom the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge: International Society for Science and Religion. 159
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1978), Istina i metoda: osnovi filozofske hermeneutike, Sarajevo: „Veselin Masleša“. Gardner, Helen (1959), The Business of Criticism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Garrard, Graeme (2001), Joseph de Maistre and Carl Schmitt“, u: Richard A. Lebrun (prir),Joseph de Maistre’s Life, Thought, and Influence, Montreal: McGi11-Queen’s University Press, str. 220-238. Garard, Greim (2011), Protivprosvetiteljstva: od osamna estog veka do danas, Banja Luka: Vidici. Gaše, Rodolf (1987a), „Dekonstrukcija kao kritika I“, Književna kritikais (5): 91-108. Gáže, Rodolf (1987b), „Dekonstrukcija kao kritika II“, Književna kritika!^ (6): 107-121. Goethe Schiller (1796), „Xenien“: http://www. digbib.org/Friedrich_von_Schiller_1759/Xenien (pristupljeno 14. marta 2018). Gorz, André (1990), Kritik der ökonomischen Vernunft: Sinnfragen amFndedlerĀrbeitsgesellschaft, Berlin: Rotbuch. Habermas, Jirgen (1975), Saznanje Unteres, Beograd: Noht. Habermas, Jürgen (1981), „Filozofija kao namesnik і tumač“, Filozofska istraživanja 4/5: 59-69. Habermas, Jürgen (1982), „Čemu još filozofija“, u: Josip Brkič (prir.), Čemu još filozofija, Zagreb: Centar za kul turnu djelatnost, տէր. 59-71.
14 Literatura Habermas, Jürgen (1986), Tehnika і znanost kao „ideolo gija“, Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Habermas, Jürgen (1988a), Filozofski diskurs moderne, Zagreb: Globus. Habermas, Jirgen (1988b),,Jedinstvo uma u mnoštvu njegovih glasova“, Gledišta 3-4: 253-266. Habermas, Jirgen (1988c), „Modernost - jedan necelo viti projekat“, u: Milan Damnjanović Emina Kulenović-Grujić (prir.), Umetnost iprogres, Beograd: „Književne novine“, str. 28-37. Habermas, Juergen (1997a), Theorie des kommunikati ven Handelns, tom 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellsc haftliche Rationalisierung, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Habermas, Juergen (1997b), Theorie des kommunikati ven Handelns, tom 2: Zur Kritik derfunktionalistischen Vernunft, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Habermas, Jürgen (1998), On the Pragmatics of Commu nication, M. Cooke (prir.), Cambridge: MIT Press. Habermas, Jirgern (2002a), „Metafizika posle Kanta“, u: Postmetafizičko mišljenje: Filozofski članci, Beograd: Časopis Beogradski krug, str. 18-37. Habermas, Jirgen (2002b), „Filozofija i nauka kao knji ževnost“, u: Postmetafizičko mišljenje: Filozofski članci, Beograd: Časopis Beogradski krug, str. 267-290. Habermas, Jirgen (2012),Javno mnjenje: istraživanje u oblastijedne kategorije građanskog društva, Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing. 161
Hajdeger, Martin (2000), „Čemu pesnici?“, u: Šumski putevi, Beograd: Plato, str. 209-253. Hamann, Johann Georg (1996 [1784]), „Metacritique on the Purism of Reason“, u: James Schmidt (prir.), What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, Berkeley: University of California Press, str. 154-167. Hamann, Johann Georg (2007 [1760]), „Aesthetica in Nuce“, u: Writings on Philosophy and Language, Kenneth Haynes (prir.), New York: Cambridge Universi ty Press, str. 60-95. Hamilton, Alastair (1999), TheApocryphalApocalypse: The Reception of The Second Book ofEsdras (4 Ezra)from The Renaissante to the Enlightenment, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970a), „Aufklärung - Wirkenwollen durch Verstand“, u: Frühe Schrißen, Werke, tom I, Frankfiirt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 21-33. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970b), „Glauben und Wissen oder die Reflexionsphilosophie der Subjektivität in derVollständigkeit ihrer Formen als Kantische, Jacobische und Fichtesche Philosophie“, u:Jenaer Schrißen, Werke, tom II, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 287-301. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970c), Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, Werke, tom XII, Frankfbrt/M.: Suhrkamp. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970d), Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion П, Werke, tom XVII, Frankfmt/M.: Suhrkamp. Hegel, G . W. F. (1970e), Phänomenologie des Geistes, Werke, tom III, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
14 Literatura Hegel, G. W. F. (1970Ѓ), Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie Ш, Werke, tom XX, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970g), „Kritisches Journal der Philosop hie. Einleitung. Über das Wesen der philosophischen Kritik überhaupt und ihr Verhältnis zum gegenwärtigen Zustand der Philosophie insbesondere“, u:Jenaer Schriften, Werke, tom П, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 171-187. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970h), „Das älteste Systemprogramm des deutschen Idealismus“, u: Frühe Schriften, Werke, tom I, Frankfiirt/M.: Suhrkamp, str. 234-236. Helderlin, Fridrih (1969), Odabrana dela, Beograd: Nolit. Herder, Johann Gottfried (1799), Eine Metakritik zur Kri tik der reinen Vernunft, Frankfort und Leipzig: bez oznake izdavača: http://ia600500.us.archive.Org//load_djvu_applet. php?ffle=19/items/einemetakridkz01herdgoog/einemetakritikz01herdgoog.djvu (pristupljeno 23. maja 2010). Hill, R. Kevin (2005), Nietzsche’s Critiques: The Kantian Foundations ofhis Thought, Oxford: Clarendon. Hobsbawm, Eric (1987), Doba revolucije, Evropa 1789-1848, Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Horinan, Amos (1988), „The Origins of the Theory of the Philosphe Conspiracy“, French History 2 (2): 152-172. Holbah, Pol (1950 [1770]), Sistem prirode ili о zakonima fizičkog i moralnog sveta, Beograd: Prosveta. Honneth, Axel (1985a), „An Aversion Against the Uni versal: A Commentary on Lyotard’s Postmodern Condi tion“, Theory, Culture Society 2 (3): 147-156. 163
Honneth, Axel (1985b), Kritik derMacht; Reflexionsstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie, Franfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Honneth, Axel (1994), Desintegration. Bruchstücke einer soziologischen Zeitdiagnose, Frankfurt/M.: Fischer. Honneth, Axel (1995a), The Strugglefor Recognition; The Moral Grammar ofSocial Conflicts, Cambridge: The MIT Press. Honneth, Axel (1995b), „A Fragmented World: On the Implicit Relevance of Lukács’ Early Work“, u: Axel Honneth, The Fragmented World ofthe Social; Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, Charles W. Wright (prir.), Albany: SUNY, str. 50-60. Honneth, Axel (2003), „Redistribution as Recognition: A Response to Nancy Fraser“, u: Nancy Fraser Axel Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition: A Political-Phi losophical Exchange, London, Verso, str. 110-197. Honneth, Axel (2004), „A Social Pathology of Reason: On the Intellectual Legacy of Critical Theory“, u: Fred Rush (prir.), The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theo ry, New York: Cambridge University Press, str. 336-360. Honneth, Axel (2007), „The Social Dynamics of Disres pect: On the Location of Critical Theory Today“, u: Axel Honneth, Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press, str. 63-79. Honneth, Axel (2008), Reification: A New Look atan Old Idea, New York: Oxford University Press. Horkhajmer, Maks (1976), „Tradicionalna i kritička teorija“, u: Tradicionalna i kritička teorija, Beograd: BIGZ, str. 31-81.
14 Literatura Horkheimer, Мах (1972), „Ideologie und Handeln“, u: Kurt Lenk (prir.), Ideologie. Ideologiekritik und Wissenso ziologie, Berlin: Luchterhand, str. 245-252. Horkheimer, Max (1982), „Društvena funkcija filozofi je“, u: Kritička teorija II, Zagreb: Stvarnost, str. 254-270. Horkheimer, Max (1988), Kritām instrumentalnog uma: iz predavanja i zabilježakd nakon svršetka rata, Zagreb: Globus. Horkheimer, Max Theodor Adorno (1997), Dialektik der Aufklärung, Adorno: Gesammelte Schriften, tom 3, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Hoy, David (2004), Critical Resistance: From Poststructu ralism to Post-Critique, Cambridge: MIT Press. Israel, Jonathan (2006), Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation ofMan 1670-1752, New York: Oxford University Press. Ivkovič, Marjan (2017), Kritička teorija Aksela Honeta: ka prevazilaženju metafizike, Beograd: Institut za filozofi ju i društvenu teoriju. Jaumann, Herbert (1995), Critica: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Literaturkritik zwischen Quintilian und Thomasius, Leiden: Brill. Kant, Immanuel (1968a [1781]), Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Gesammelten Schriften, tom 2, Berlin: De Gruyter. 165
Kant, Immanuel (1968b [1784]), „Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?“, u: Gesammelten Schriften, tom 8, Berlin: De Gruyter, տէր. 35-42. Kant, Immanuel (1968c [1786]), „Was heisst: sich im Denken orientiren?“, u: Gesammelten Schriften, tom 8, Berlin: De Gruyter, str. 133-147. Kant, Immanuel (1968d [1800]), Logic, Gesammelten Schriften, tom 9, Berlin: De Gruyter. Kasirer, Ernst (2003), Filozofija prosvetiteljstva, Beograd: Gutenbergova galaksija. Keats, John (2013), Lamia·, http://www.gutenberg.org/ ffles/2490/2490-h/2490-h.htm#link2H_PART2(pristupljeno 14. mart 2018). Kilminster, Richard (2013), „Critique and Overcritique in Sociology“, Human Figurations 2 (2): https://quod. lib.umich.edu/h/humfig/11217607.0002.205/-critique-and-overcritique-in-sociology?rgn=main;view=fulltext (pristupljeno 8. avgust 2018). Kopić, Mario (2018), „Oproštaj od kritike“, u: Žudnja і stremljenje, Zagreb: Matica Hrvatska, str. 49-73. Kozelek, Rajnhart (1997), Kritika i kriza: studija оpato ģenēzi građanskog sveta, Beograd: Plato. Krstić, Predrag (2003), „Prosvećenost“, u: Đorđe Vukadinović Predrag Krstić (prir.), Kritičkipojmovnik civilnog društva, Beograd: Grupa 484, str. 181-231. Krstić, Predrag (2007a), „Negativno prosvetiteljstvo“, Trećiprogram 135-136 (III-IV): 20-42.
14 Literatura Krstić, Predrag (2007b), „Čemu još kritika“, Filozofija i društvo 33 (2): 9-42. Krstić, Predrag, (2010), „Auschwitz, Adorno i posle“, u: Željko Šarić (prir.), Kritička teorija društva, Banja Luka: Udruženje za filozofiju i društvenu misao, str. 9-33. Krstić, Predrag (2015), „Rana konzervativna kritika prosvetiteljstva“, Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka 9 (13): 205-224. Krstić, Predrag (2016a), Strategije odrastanja:prosvečenost i reakcije, Beograd: Službeni glasnik. Krstić, Predrag (2016b), О čemu govorimo kad govo rimo оprosvetiteljstvu, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju. Laclau, Ernesto Chantal Mouffe (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, New York: Verso. Latour, Bruno (2004), „Why Has Critique Run Out Of Steam? From Matters of Fact, to Matters of Concern“, Critical Inquiry 30: 225-248. Le Clerc, Jean (1700 [1697]), Ars critica, tom I-II, Amsterdam: G. Gallet: http://books.google.rs/ books?id=VLUTAAAAQAAJ printsec=frontcover hl=sr source=gbs_ge_summary_r cad=0#v=onepage q f=false (pristupljeno 3. maja 2009). Lenk, Hans (1987), Kritik der kleinen Vernunft: Einführung in diejokologische Philosophie, Frank furt/M.: Suhrkamp. 167
Leontev, Konstantin Nikolayevich (1996), Fostok, Ro ssija i slavyianstvo:filosof.skayia ipolitičeskayia publicistik, Moskva: Respublika. Lessing, Hans Ulrich (1984), Die Idee einer Kritik der historischen Vernunft: Wilhelm Diltheys erkenntnistheore tisch-logisch-methodologische Grundlegung der Geisteswis senschaften, Freiburg: Alber. Lilla, Mark (1993), G. B. Vico: The Making ofan An ti-Modem, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Llobera, Josep (2003), Making of Totalitarian Thought, Oxford: Berg. Lošonc, Mark (2012), „Kritika lajkujućeg uma“, Stvar 3: 93-106. Lowith, Karl (1988), Od Hegela do Nietzscheä, Sarajevo: „Veselin Maslesa“. Lukač, Đerđ (1970), Povijest i klasna svijest, Zagreb: Naprijed. Lyotard, Jean-François (1990), Postmoderna protumače na djeci, Zagreb: August Cesaree. Liotar, Žan-Fransoa (1988), Postmoderno stanje, Novi Sad: Bratstvo-Jedinstvo. Liotar, Žan-Fransoa (1989), „Adorno kao đavo“, Delo 1-2-3:158-174. Liotar, Žan-Fransoa (1991), Raskol, Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižamica Zorana Stojanoviča.
14 Literatura Maistre, Joseph de (1993), St. Petersburg Dialogues: Or Conversations on the Temporal Government ofProvidence, Montreal: McGill-Qtieen’s University Press. Maistre, Joseph de (1996 [ 1796] ), Against Rousseau: „On the State ofNature“ and „On the Sovereignty ofthe People“, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Mestr, Žozef de (2001a), „Razmišljanja o protestantiz mu kroz njegove odnose sa državom (1798)“, u: Spisi о revoluciji, Cačak: Umetničko društvo Gradac, str. 153-169. Mestr, Žozef de (2001b[1797j), „Razmatranja о Fran cuskoj“, u: Spisi о revoluciji, Cačak: Umetničko društvo Gradac, str. 71-152. Mestr, Žozef de (2001c [1793]), „Četvrto pismo jednog savojskog rojaliste svojim sunarodnicima“, u: Spisi о revo luciji, Čačak: Umetničko društvo Gradac, str. 24-55. Mestr, Žozef de (2013 [1821]), О dželatu, Beograd: Službeni glasnik. Manhajm, Karl (1978), Ideologija i utopija, Beograd: Noht. Manuel, Frank E. (1963), The New World ofHenri Sa int-Simon, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Marmontel, Jean-François (1751), „Critique“, u: L’Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers·, http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/L%E2%80%99Encyclop%C3%A9die/Volume_4#CRITIQUE (pristupljeno 12. septembra 2006). 169
Marx, Karl Friedrich Engels (1985), „Njemačka ide ologija“, u: Karl Marx Friedrich Engels, Rani radovi, Zagreb: Naprijed, str. 355-428. Marx, Karl (1985a), „Prilog jevrejskom pitanju“, u: Karl Marx Friedrich Engels, Rani radovi, Zagreb: Naprijed, str. 54-89. Karl Marx (1985b), „Pismo Arnoldu Rugeu. Kreuzna ch, septembar 1843“, u: Karl Marx Friedrich Engels, Rani radovi, Naprijed, Zagreb, str. 50-53. Mattessich, Stefan (2008), „Self-Critical Theory: Dis cursive Strategies in an Era of Real Universality“, New Literary History 39 (2): 301-320. McMahon, Darrin M. (2001), Enemies ofthe Enlighten ment: The French Counter-Enlightenment and the Ma king ofModernity, New York: Oxford University Press. Meier, Heinrich (1988), The Lesson of Carl Schmitt, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Mišić, Dr Vladimir (2018), „Konstruktivna і destruktivna kritika“: https://www.vaspsiholog.com/2011/04/konstruktivna-i-destruktivna-kritika/ (pristupljeno 2. avgusta 2018). Mouffe, Chantal (2005), On the Political, New York: Routledge. Neiman, Susan (1994), The Unity ofReason: Rereading Kant, New York: Oxford University Press. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1967a),Jenseits von Gut und Böse, Krititsche Gesamtausgabe, tom 6.2, Berlin: De Gruyter.
14 Literatura Nietzsche, Friedrich (1967b), Nachgelassenefragmente Anfang 1888 - Anfangjanuar 1889, Kritische Gesam tausgabe, tom 8.3, Berlin: De Gruyter. Nizbet, Robert (1995), „Konzervativizam“, Trećipro gram 101:275-322. , Novalis (1967), „Fragmenti“, U: Zoran Gluščević (prir.), Romantizam, Cetinje: Obod, str. 61-77. Oxford Living Dictionaries (2017), https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/defmition/critique (pristupljeno 9. jula 2018). Peri, Marvin (2000), Intelektualna istorija Evrope, Beo grad: Clio. Petherbridge, Danielle (2011), „Introduction: Axel Honneth’s Project of Critical Theory“, u: Danielle Petherbridge (prir.), Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, Leiden: Brill, str. 1-30. Pope, Alexander (1801), An Essay on Criticism: with Expla natory Notes / Versuch über die Kritik, Vienna: R. Sammer. Popkin, Richard Henry (1994), „Spinoza and Bible Scholarship“, u: James E. Force Richard Henry Popkin (prir.), The Books ofNature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands ofSpinoza ’s Time and the British Isles of Newton’s Time, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, str. 1-20. Porter, Roy (2008), Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation ofthe Modem World, London: Penguin. 1Л
Poulouin, Claudine (1998), Le temps des origines: l’Eden, le Déluge et „les temps reculésde Pascal à „L’Encyclopé die“, Paris: H. Champion. Prakash, Gyan (1999), Another Reason: Science and the Imagination in Modem India, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pranchere, Jean-Yves (2001a),,Joseph de Maistre’s Catholic Philosophy of Authority“, u: Richard Lebrun {prir.),Joseph de Maistre’s Life, Thought and Influence: Selected Studies, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, տէր. 131-152. Pranchere, Jean-Yves (2001b), „The Persistence of Ma isalan Thought“, u: Richard Lebrun (prìr.),Joseph de Maistre’s Life, Thought and Influence: Seleđed Studies, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, str. 290-325. Rajič, Jovan (2002), Istorija slovenskih naroda, Novi Sad: Matica srpska, Orfeus. Rebughini, Paola (2018), „Critical Agency and The Future of Critique“, Current Sociology 66 (1): 3-19. Reijen, Willem van (1986), Philosophie als Kritik. Einführung in die Kritische Theorie, Königstein/T.: Athenäum. Riker, Pol (2010), О tumačenju: ogled o Frojdu, Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
14 Literatura Robinson, John (2014), Proofs ofa Conspiracy: Against all the Religions and Governments ofEurope, carried on in the Secret Meetings ofFree Masons, Illuminati and Reading Societies՝, http://www.gutenberg.org/ files/47605/47605-h/47605-h.htm (pristupljeno 2. decembra 2017). Rorty, Amelie Oksenberg (prir.) (2003), The Many Faces ofPhilosophy: Reflectionsfrom Plato to Arendt, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rorty, Richard (1988), „The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy“, u: Merrill D. Peterson Robert C. Vaug han (prir.), The Virginia Statute ofReligious Freedom: Its Evolution and Consequences in American History, Cam bridge: Cambridge University Press, str. 381-402. Rorty, Richard (1990), Filozofija і ogledalo prirode, Sara jevo: „Veselin Masleša“. Rorty, Richard (1995), Kontingencija, ironija і solidar nost, Zagreb: Naprijed. Rorty, Richard (2001), „The Continuity between the Enlightenment and ’Postmodernism’“, u: Keith Baker Peter Reill (prir.), What’s Left ofEnlightenment? A Postmodern Question, Stanford: Stanford University Press, str. 19-36. Rorty, Richard (2007a), „Pragmatism as Romantic Polytheism“, u: Philosophy As Cultural Politics, Philosop hical Papers, tom 4, New York: Cambridge University Press, str. 27-41. 173
Rorty, Richard (2007b), „Pragmatism and Romanti cism“, u: Philosophy As Cultural Politics, Philosophical Papers, tom 4, New York: Cambridge University Press, str. 105-11?. Rorti, Ričard (1992), Konsekvencepragmatizma, Beo grad: Nolit. Rorti, Ričard (2004), „Propast izbaviteljske istine і uspon književne kulture“, Trećiprogram 123-124(3-4): 139-158. Rozanov, Vasily Vasilyevich (1990 [1899]), Sumerki prosveshcheniya. Sbomik stateipo voprosamobrazovania, Moskva: Pedagogika. Sartr, Žan-Pol (1983), Kritika dijalektičkog uma, Izabra na dela, tom 11-12, Beograd: Nolit. Saul, Nicholas (2002), „The Pursuit of the Subject: Lite rature as Critic and Perfecter of Philosophy 1790-1830“, u: Nicholas Saul (prir.), Philosophy and German Literatu re, 1700-1990, West Nyack: Cambridge University Press, str. 57-101. Schelgel, Friedrich (1971), Lucindeand the Fragments, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ŠIegel, Fridrih (1999a), „Fragmenti Liceum“, u: Ironija ljubavi: (izbor iz dela), Beograd: Zepter, str. 5-22. Šlegel, Fridrih (1999b), „Fragmenti Ateneum“, u: Ironija ljubavi: (izbor iz dela), Beograd: Zepter, str. 24-105.
14 Literatura Šlegel, Fridrih (1999c), „Fragmenti Ideje“, u: Ironija ljubavi: (izbor iz dela), Beograd: Zepter, str. 106-122. Schelling, F. W. J. (1986 [1800]), Sistem transcendental nog idealizma, Zagreb: Naprijed. Schmitt, Carl (1976), The Concept ofthe Political, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Schmitt, Carl (1986), Political Romanticism, London: MIT Press. Schmitt, Carl (1988), Political Theology, London: MIT Press. Shelley, Percy Bysshe (1821), Defence ofPoetry·, http:// rpo.library.utoronto.ca/content/defence-poetry-part-fi rst-1821 (pristupljeno 12. februara 2010). Sioran, Emil (2001), „Žozef de Mestr. Esej o reakcionar noj misli“, u: Žozef de Mestr, Spisi о revoluciji, Čačak: Umetničko društvo Gradac, str. 173-204. Skerlić, Jovan (1907-1926), Pisci i knjige, tom 1-9, Beo grad: Nova štamparija „Davidović“, Geca Kon. Sloterdajk, Peter (1991), Tetoviram život, Gornji Milanovac: Dečje novine. Sloterdajk, Peter (2000a), „Kritička teorija je mrtva“, Reč 57(3): 207-212. Sloterdajk, Peter (2000b), „Pravila za ljudski vrt: odgo vor na Hajdegerovo pismo o humanizmu“, Reč Ы (3): 187-202. 175
Sloterdijk, Peter (1988): Kopernikanska mobilizacija і ptolomejsko razoružanje: ogled iz estetike, Novi Sad: Bratstvo-Jedinstvo. Sloterdijk, Peter (1992), Kritika ciničkoga uma, Zagreb: Globus. Solzhenicin, Alexander (1995 [1978]), „Reč na Garva de“, u: Publicistika v treh tomah, tom 1, Moskva: Verh.Volž, str, 309-328. Sorokin, Pitirim (1957), Social and Cultural Dynamics, Boston: Porter Sargent. Spinoza, Baruh de (1957 [1670]), Teološko politički trak tat, Beograd: Kultura. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1988), „Сап Subaltern Speak?“, u: Cary Nelson Lawrence Grossberg (prir.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Basingstoke : Macmillan, str. 271-313. Spivak, Gajatri Čakravorti (2003), Kritika postkolonijalnog urna, Beograd: Beogradski krug. Stefanovič, Mirjana (2009), Leksikon srpskogprosvetiteljstva, Beograd: Službeni glasnik. Sturma, Dieter (2005), „Politics and the New Mytho logy: the Turn to Late Romanticism“, u: Karl Ameriks (prir.), The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, New York: Cambridge University Press, str. 219-238. Tojnbi, Arnold (1970), Istraživanje istorije, tom 1-2, Beograd: Prosveta.
14 Literatura Tokvil, Aleksis de (1990), O demokratiji и Amend, Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojano viča, Titograd: CID. Vattimo, Gianni (1990), „Postmodern Criticism: Pos tmodern Critique“, u: David Wood (prir.), Writing the Future, London: Routledge, տէր. 57-66. Velmer, Albreht (1987), Prilog dijalektici modernei postmoderne. Kritika uma posle Adorna, Novi Sad: Bratstvo-Jedinstvo. Voegelin, Eric (1982), From Enlightenment to Revoluti on, Durham: Duke University Press. Volter, Fransoa Mari Arue (1973), Filozofski remik, Novi Sad: Matica srpska. Von Hendy, Andrew (2001), Modem Construction of Myth, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Vraneš, Branko (2015), „Skerličeva kritika modernizma і mentalitet (srpske) književne kritike“, u: Miro Vuksa novič (prirі),Jovan Skerlić danas, Beograd: SANU, str. 145-156. Weber, Max (1949), „The Meaning of’Ethical Neutra lity’“, u: Edward A. Shils Henry A. Finch (prir.), The Methodology ofthe Social Science, New York: Free Press, str. 1-47. Weber, Max (1988), „Debattereden auf der Tagung des Vereins für Sozialpolitik in Wien 1909 zu den Verhand lungen über ’Die wirtschaftlichen Unternehmungen 177
der Gemeinden’“, u: Max Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Soziologie und Sozialpolitik, Marianne Weber (prir.), Tübingen: Mohr, str. 412-416. Veber, Maks (1987), „Racionalizam zapadne kutlure“, u: Mihajlo Durie (prir.), Sociologija Maksa Vebera, Zagreb: Naprijed, str. 290-305. Vaughan, Larry (1989),Johann Georg Hamann: Metap hysics ofLanguage and Vision ofHistory, New York: P. Lang. Weller, Shane (2008), „Literature and the Politics of Madness: On the Twentieth-Century Reception of Frie drich Hölderlin in France and Germany“, Comparative Critical Studies 5:193-206. Zaharijević, Adriana Predrag Krstić (2018), „U čemu je vrlina kritike?“, u: Adriana Zaharijević Predrag Krstić (prir.), Šta je kritika?, Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga, Beo grad: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, str. 7-34. Žižek, Slavoj (1989), The Sublime Object ofIdeology, London: Verso. Žižek, Slavoj (1993), Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique ofIdeology, Durham: Duke Uni versity Press. Žmegač, Viktor (1986), „Razvoj romantičarskog pokreta“, u: Viktor Žmegač (prir.), Njemačka književnost, Zagreb: SNL, str. 86-106.
14 Literatura Korisna dela Alberro, Alexander Blake Stimson (prir.) (2009), Institutional Critique: An Anthology ofArtists’ Writings, Cambridge: MIT Press. Amossy, Ruth (1992), La politique du texte: enjeux socio critiques, Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille. Anderson, Joel Axel Honneth (2005), „Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice“, u: John Christman. Joel Anderson (prir.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays, New York: Cam bridge University Press, str. 127-149. Barthes, Roland (1966), Critique et vérité, Paris: Seuil. Benjamin, Walter (2018), „Zur Kritik der Gewalt / Pri log kritici nasilja“, u: Petar Bojanie (prir.), Benjaminova kritika nasilja:prilozi i komentari, Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, str. 25-103. Birch, David (1991), Language, Literature and Critical Practice: Ways ofAnalysing Text, London: Routledge. Boltanski, Luc Nancy Fraser (2014), Domination et émancipation pour un renouveau dela critique sociale, Lyon: PUL. 179
Dant, Tim (2003), Critical Social Theory: Culture, Society and Critique, London: SAGE. Henrich, Dieter (1987), Konzepte: Essays zur Philosophie in der Zeit, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Dubrovski, Serž (1989), Zašto nova kritika?Kritika і objektivnost, Novi Sad: Književna zajednica Novog Sada. Élissalde, Yvan (2000), Critique de ľinterprétation, Paris: Vrin. Fayolle, Roger (1978y), La critique, Paris: Armand Colin. Gardes Tamine, Joëlle Marie-Claude Hubert (2004), Dictionnaire de critique littéraire, Paris: Armand Colin. Genette, Gérard (1979), „Raisons de la critique pure“, Figures II: 7-22. Honneth, Axel (1995), „The Other ofJustice: Haber mas and the Ethical Challenge of Postmodernism“, u: Stephen K. White (prir.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, New York: Cambridge University Press, str. 289-323. Honneth, Axel (2000), Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit: Aufsätze zurpraktischen Philosophie, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
14 Literatura Kolb, David (1986), The Critique ofPure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger and After, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Kriger, Mari (1982), Teorija kritike, Beograd: Nolit. Kubok, Dariusz (prir.) (2018), Thinking Critically: What Does It Mean? The Tradition ofPhilosophical Criticism and Its Forms in the European History ofIdeas, Berlin: De Gruyter. Lauševič, Savo (1995), Filosofskipojam kritike, Nikšić: Unireks. Margolin, Victor (prir.) (1989), Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Matovič, Vesna (1990), „Vidovi društveno angažované kritičke misli u srpskoj književnosti 1868-1914", Književ na istorija 22 (83/84): 99-105. Mitrinović-Olečikus, Dimitrije (1988), „Stvaralačka kritika“, Delo 34 (9/10): 259-265; Milič, Novica (1982), Antinomife kritike, Novi Sad: Matica srpska. Musil, Robert (1981), Kritik, Reinbek/H.: Rowohlt. Pirie, David В. ( 1992), How to write Critical Essays: A Guidefor Students ofLiterature, London: Routledge. 181
Prohić, Kasim (1988), Filozofska i umjetnička kritika, Sarajevo: Svjetlost, „Veselin Masléša“. Pule, Žorž (1995), Kritička svest, Sremski Karlovci: Izda vačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanoviča. Reboul, J acquette (1986), Critique universitaire et cri tique créatrice, Paris: Amateurs de livres. Rebughini, Paola (2015), „Framing Emancipations“, Journal of Classical Sociology 15 (3): 270-285. Role, Žerar (1989), „Nada і kritika ili sekularizacija po Ernstu Blochu“, Gledišta ЗО (3/4): 58-66. Salmon, Pierre (1976), Histoire et critique: sociologie générale etphilosophie sociale, Bruxelles: Université Libre. Seid, Edvard (1987), „Razmišljanja о američkoj ’Ievoj’ književnoj kritici“, Književna kritika 18 (6): 40-54. Sitter-Liver, Beat (prir.) (2007), Utopie heute I: Zur aktuellen Bedeutung Funktion und Kritik des utopischen Denkens und Vorstellens, Fribourg: Academic Press, Stutt gart: Kohlhammer. Starobinski, Žan (1990), Kritički odnos, Sremski Karlov ci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanoviča. Tilih, Paul (1985), „Kritika i opravdanje utopije”, Knji ževna kritika 16(2): 150-156.
14 Literatura Todorov, Tzvetan (1984), Critique de la critique: un roman d'apprentissage, Paris: Seuil. Tompkins, Jane P. (prir.) (1988), Reader-Response Critici sm: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Visković, Velimir (1988), Pozicija kritičara, Zagreb: Znanje. |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Krstić, Predrag |
| author_facet | Krstić, Predrag |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Krstić, Predrag |
| author_variant | p k pk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047021920 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1224010684 (DE-599)BVBBV047021920 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01935nam a2200421 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047021920</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201120s2019 a||| |||| 00||| srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788680484273</subfield><subfield code="9">978-86-80484-27-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1224010684</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047021920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Krstić, Predrag</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici</subfield><subfield code="c">Predrag Krstić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Beograd</subfield><subfield code="b">Univerzitet u Beogradu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">183 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Edicija O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o ---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverzeichnis Seite 150-183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophische Anthropologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045798-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kritik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033229-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kritik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033229-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Philosophische Anthropologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045798-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032429376&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032429376&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20201120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032429376</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4971</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047021920 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T15:59:27Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:00:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788680484273 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032429376 |
| oclc_num | 1224010684 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 183 Seiten Illustrationen |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20201120 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Univerzitet u Beogradu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Edicija O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o --- |
| spelling | Krstić, Predrag Verfasser aut O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici Predrag Krstić Beograd Univerzitet u Beogradu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju 2019 183 Seiten Illustrationen txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Edicija O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o --- Literaturverzeichnis Seite 150-183 Philosophische Anthropologie (DE-588)4045798-9 gnd rswk-swf Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd rswk-swf Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 gnd rswk-swf Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 s Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 s Philosophische Anthropologie (DE-588)4045798-9 s DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032429376&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032429376&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Krstić, Predrag O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici Philosophische Anthropologie (DE-588)4045798-9 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4045798-9 (DE-588)4045791-6 (DE-588)4033229-9 |
| title | O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici |
| title_auth | O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici |
| title_exact_search | O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici |
| title_exact_search_txtP | O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici |
| title_full | O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici Predrag Krstić |
| title_fullStr | O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici Predrag Krstić |
| title_full_unstemmed | O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici Predrag Krstić |
| title_short | O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici |
| title_sort | o cemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici |
| topic | Philosophische Anthropologie (DE-588)4045798-9 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Philosophische Anthropologie Philosophie Kritik |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032429376&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032429376&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT krsticpredrag ocemugovorimokadgovorimookritici |