A debate on God and morality: what is the best account of objective moral values and duties?
"In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objecti...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York, NY
Routledge
2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms"-- |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xii, 234 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9781000093223 1000093220 9781003055259 1003055257 9781000093193 1000093190 9781000093254 1000093255 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047016676 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201118s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781000093223 |9 978-1-00-009322-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 1000093220 |9 1-00-009322-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781003055259 |9 978-1-00-305525-9 | ||
| 020 | |a 1003055257 |9 1-00-305525-7 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781000093193 |9 978-1-00-009319-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 1000093190 |9 1-00-009319-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781000093254 |9 978-1-00-009325-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 1000093255 |9 1-00-009325-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-7-TFC)9781000093223 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047016676 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 170/.42 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Craig, William Lane |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A debate on God and morality |b what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? |c William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York, NY |b Routledge |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xii, 234 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed | ||
| 520 | |a "In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms"-- | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Atheism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral realism | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wielenberg, Erik J. |d 1972- |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Johnson, Adam Lloyd |4 edt | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003055259 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveroeffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-7-TFC | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032424212 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804181978036043776 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Craig, William Lane Wielenberg, Erik J. 1972- |
| author2 | Johnson, Adam Lloyd |
| author2_role | edt |
| author2_variant | a l j al alj |
| author_facet | Craig, William Lane Wielenberg, Erik J. 1972- Johnson, Adam Lloyd |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Craig, William Lane |
| author_variant | w l c wl wlc e j w ej ejw |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047016676 |
| collection | ZDB-7-TFC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-7-TFC)9781000093223 (DE-599)BVBBV047016676 |
| dewey-full | 170/.42 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy) |
| dewey-raw | 170/.42 |
| dewey-search | 170/.42 |
| dewey-sort | 3170 242 |
| dewey-tens | 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy) |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| discipline_str_mv | Philosophie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03011nmm a2200469zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047016676</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201118s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781000093223</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-00-009322-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1000093220</subfield><subfield code="9">1-00-009322-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781003055259</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-00-305525-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1003055257</subfield><subfield code="9">1-00-305525-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781000093193</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-00-009319-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1000093190</subfield><subfield code="9">1-00-009319-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781000093254</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-00-009325-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1000093255</subfield><subfield code="9">1-00-009325-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-7-TFC)9781000093223</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047016676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">170/.42</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Craig, William Lane</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A debate on God and morality</subfield><subfield code="b">what is the best account of objective moral values and duties?</subfield><subfield code="c">William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xii, 234 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">God</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Theism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Atheism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Moral realism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wielenberg, Erik J.</subfield><subfield code="d">1972-</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Johnson, Adam Lloyd</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003055259</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveroeffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-7-TFC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032424212</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047016676 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T15:58:18Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:00:14Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781000093223 1000093220 9781003055259 1003055257 9781000093193 1000093190 9781000093254 1000093255 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032424212 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 online resource (xii, 234 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-7-TFC |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Craig, William Lane Verfasser aut A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson New York, NY Routledge 2020 1 online resource (xii, 234 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed "In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms"-- Ethics God Theism Atheism Moral realism Wielenberg, Erik J. 1972- aut Johnson, Adam Lloyd edt https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003055259 Verlag URL des Erstveroeffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Craig, William Lane Wielenberg, Erik J. 1972- A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? Ethics God Theism Atheism Moral realism |
| title | A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? |
| title_auth | A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? |
| title_exact_search | A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? |
| title_exact_search_txtP | A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? |
| title_full | A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson |
| title_fullStr | A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson |
| title_full_unstemmed | A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson |
| title_short | A debate on God and morality |
| title_sort | a debate on god and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties |
| title_sub | what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? |
| topic | Ethics God Theism Atheism Moral realism |
| topic_facet | Ethics God Theism Atheism Moral realism |
| url | https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003055259 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT craigwilliamlane adebateongodandmoralitywhatisthebestaccountofobjectivemoralvaluesandduties AT wielenbergerikj adebateongodandmoralitywhatisthebestaccountofobjectivemoralvaluesandduties AT johnsonadamlloyd adebateongodandmoralitywhatisthebestaccountofobjectivemoralvaluesandduties |