Judicializing the administrative state: the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937
A basic feature of the modern US administrative state taken for granted by legal scholars but neglected by political scientists and historians is its strong judiciality. Formal, or court-like, adjudication was the primary method of first-order agency policy making during the first half of the twenti...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Abingdon, Oxon
Routledge
2020
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Routledge research in public administration and public policy
Routledge research in public administration and public policy |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | URL des Erstveroeffentlichers |
| Zusammenfassung: | A basic feature of the modern US administrative state taken for granted by legal scholars but neglected by political scientists and historians is its strong judiciality. Formal, or court-like, adjudication was the primary method of first-order agency policy making during the first half of the twentieth century. Even today, most US administrative agencies hire administrative law judges and other adjudicators conducting hearings using formal procedures autonomously from the agency head. No other industrialized democracy has even comeclose to experiencing the systematic state judicialization that took place in the United States. Why did the American administrative state become highly judicialized, rather than developing a more efficiency-oriented Weberian bureaucracy? Legal scholars argue that lawyers as a profession imposed the judicial procedures they were the most familiar with on agencies. But this explanation fails to show why the judicialization took place only in the United States at the time it did. Okayama demonstrates that the American institutional combination of common law and the presidential system favored policy implementation through formal procedures by autonomous agencies and that it induced the creation and development of independent regulatory commissions explicitly modeled after courts from the late nineteenth century. These commissions judicialized the state not only through their proliferation but also through the diffusion of their formal procedures to executive agencies over the next half century, which led to a highly fairness-oriented administrative state |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on July 11, 2019) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
| ISBN: | 9781315141886 1315141884 9781351393348 1351393340 9781351393324 1351393324 9781351393331 1351393332 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047010971 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201118s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781315141886 |9 978-1-315-14188-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 1315141884 |9 1-315-14188-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781351393348 |9 978-1-351-39334-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 1351393340 |9 1-351-39334-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781351393324 |9 978-1-351-39332-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 1351393324 |9 1-351-39332-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781351393331 |9 978-1-351-39333-1 | ||
| 020 | |a 1351393332 |9 1-351-39333-2 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.4324/9781315141886 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-7-TFC)9781315141886 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047010971 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.73/0664 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Okayama, Hiroshi |d 1972- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Judicializing the administrative state |b the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 |c Hiroshi Okayama |
| 264 | 1 | |a Abingdon, Oxon |b Routledge |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Routledge research in public administration and public policy | |
| 490 | 0 | |a Routledge research in public administration and public policy | |
| 500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on July 11, 2019) | ||
| 520 | |a A basic feature of the modern US administrative state taken for granted by legal scholars but neglected by political scientists and historians is its strong judiciality. Formal, or court-like, adjudication was the primary method of first-order agency policy making during the first half of the twentieth century. Even today, most US administrative agencies hire administrative law judges and other adjudicators conducting hearings using formal procedures autonomously from the agency head. No other industrialized democracy has even comeclose to experiencing the systematic state judicialization that took place in the United States. Why did the American administrative state become highly judicialized, rather than developing a more efficiency-oriented Weberian bureaucracy? Legal scholars argue that lawyers as a profession imposed the judicial procedures they were the most familiar with on agencies. But this explanation fails to show why the judicialization took place only in the United States at the time it did. Okayama demonstrates that the American institutional combination of common law and the presidential system favored policy implementation through formal procedures by autonomous agencies and that it induced the creation and development of independent regulatory commissions explicitly modeled after courts from the late nineteenth century. These commissions judicialized the state not only through their proliferation but also through the diffusion of their formal procedures to executive agencies over the next half century, which led to a highly fairness-oriented administrative state | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Independent regulatory commissions / United States / History | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Administrative courts / United States / History | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315141886 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveroeffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-7-TFC | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032418508 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804181967363637248 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Okayama, Hiroshi 1972- |
| author_facet | Okayama, Hiroshi 1972- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Okayama, Hiroshi 1972- |
| author_variant | h o ho |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047010971 |
| collection | ZDB-7-TFC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-7-TFC)9781315141886 (DE-599)BVBBV047010971 |
| dewey-full | 342.73/0664 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.73/0664 |
| dewey-search | 342.73/0664 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.73 3664 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03358nmm a2200445zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047010971</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201118s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781315141886</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-315-14188-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1315141884</subfield><subfield code="9">1-315-14188-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781351393348</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-351-39334-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1351393340</subfield><subfield code="9">1-351-39334-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781351393324</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-351-39332-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1351393324</subfield><subfield code="9">1-351-39332-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781351393331</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-351-39333-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1351393332</subfield><subfield code="9">1-351-39333-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4324/9781315141886</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-7-TFC)9781315141886</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047010971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.73/0664</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Okayama, Hiroshi</subfield><subfield code="d">1972-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicializing the administrative state</subfield><subfield code="b">the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937</subfield><subfield code="c">Hiroshi Okayama</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Abingdon, Oxon</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Routledge research in public administration and public policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Routledge research in public administration and public policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on July 11, 2019)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A basic feature of the modern US administrative state taken for granted by legal scholars but neglected by political scientists and historians is its strong judiciality. Formal, or court-like, adjudication was the primary method of first-order agency policy making during the first half of the twentieth century. Even today, most US administrative agencies hire administrative law judges and other adjudicators conducting hearings using formal procedures autonomously from the agency head. No other industrialized democracy has even comeclose to experiencing the systematic state judicialization that took place in the United States. Why did the American administrative state become highly judicialized, rather than developing a more efficiency-oriented Weberian bureaucracy? Legal scholars argue that lawyers as a profession imposed the judicial procedures they were the most familiar with on agencies. But this explanation fails to show why the judicialization took place only in the United States at the time it did. Okayama demonstrates that the American institutional combination of common law and the presidential system favored policy implementation through formal procedures by autonomous agencies and that it induced the creation and development of independent regulatory commissions explicitly modeled after courts from the late nineteenth century. These commissions judicialized the state not only through their proliferation but also through the diffusion of their formal procedures to executive agencies over the next half century, which led to a highly fairness-oriented administrative state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Independent regulatory commissions / United States / History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Administrative courts / United States / History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315141886</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveroeffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-7-TFC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032418508</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047010971 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T15:58:09Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:00:04Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781315141886 1315141884 9781351393348 1351393340 9781351393324 1351393324 9781351393331 1351393332 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032418508 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-7-TFC |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Routledge research in public administration and public policy |
| spelling | Okayama, Hiroshi 1972- Verfasser aut Judicializing the administrative state the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 Hiroshi Okayama Abingdon, Oxon Routledge 2020 1 online resource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Routledge research in public administration and public policy Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on July 11, 2019) A basic feature of the modern US administrative state taken for granted by legal scholars but neglected by political scientists and historians is its strong judiciality. Formal, or court-like, adjudication was the primary method of first-order agency policy making during the first half of the twentieth century. Even today, most US administrative agencies hire administrative law judges and other adjudicators conducting hearings using formal procedures autonomously from the agency head. No other industrialized democracy has even comeclose to experiencing the systematic state judicialization that took place in the United States. Why did the American administrative state become highly judicialized, rather than developing a more efficiency-oriented Weberian bureaucracy? Legal scholars argue that lawyers as a profession imposed the judicial procedures they were the most familiar with on agencies. But this explanation fails to show why the judicialization took place only in the United States at the time it did. Okayama demonstrates that the American institutional combination of common law and the presidential system favored policy implementation through formal procedures by autonomous agencies and that it induced the creation and development of independent regulatory commissions explicitly modeled after courts from the late nineteenth century. These commissions judicialized the state not only through their proliferation but also through the diffusion of their formal procedures to executive agencies over the next half century, which led to a highly fairness-oriented administrative state Independent regulatory commissions / United States / History Administrative courts / United States / History https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315141886 Verlag URL des Erstveroeffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Okayama, Hiroshi 1972- Judicializing the administrative state the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 Independent regulatory commissions / United States / History Administrative courts / United States / History |
| title | Judicializing the administrative state the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 |
| title_auth | Judicializing the administrative state the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 |
| title_exact_search | Judicializing the administrative state the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Judicializing the administrative state the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 |
| title_full | Judicializing the administrative state the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 Hiroshi Okayama |
| title_fullStr | Judicializing the administrative state the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 Hiroshi Okayama |
| title_full_unstemmed | Judicializing the administrative state the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 Hiroshi Okayama |
| title_short | Judicializing the administrative state |
| title_sort | judicializing the administrative state the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the united states 1883 1937 |
| title_sub | the rise of the independent regulatory commissions in the United States, 1883-1937 |
| topic | Independent regulatory commissions / United States / History Administrative courts / United States / History |
| topic_facet | Independent regulatory commissions / United States / History Administrative courts / United States / History |
| url | https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315141886 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT okayamahiroshi judicializingtheadministrativestatetheriseoftheindependentregulatorycommissionsintheunitedstates18831937 |