US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts:
US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts challenges theoretical and empirical accounts about how state high courts use US Supreme Court doctrine and precedent. Michael Fix and Benjamin Kassow argue that theories that do not account for the full range of ways in which state high courts can...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, USA ; Port Melbourne, Australia ; New Delhi, India ; Singapore
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | BSB01 FUBA1 UBA01 UBG01 Volltext |
| Summary: | US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts challenges theoretical and empirical accounts about how state high courts use US Supreme Court doctrine and precedent. Michael Fix and Benjamin Kassow argue that theories that do not account for the full range of ways in which state high courts can act are, by definition, incomplete. Examining three important precedents - Atkins v. Virginia, Lemon v. Kurtzman, and DC v. Heller/McDonald v. Chicago - Fix and Kassow find that state high courts commonly ignore Supreme Court precedent for reasons of political ideology, path dependence, and fact patterns in cases that may be of varying similarity to those found in relevant US Supreme Court doctrine. This work, which provides an important addition to the scholarly literature on the impact of Supreme Court decisions, should be read by anyone interested in law and politics or traditional approaches to the study of legal decision-making |
| Physical Description: | 1 Online-Ressource (XXV, 182 Seiten) Illustrationen, Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9781108891141 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/9781108891141 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046911603 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210104 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200924s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108891141 |c epub |9 978-1-108-89114-1 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781108891141 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108891141 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1197710140 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046911603 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 |a DE-188 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.73/365 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Fix, Michael P. |d 1980- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1218257458 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts |c Michael P. Fix (Georgia State University), Benjamin J. Kassow (University of North Dakota) |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a U.S. Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, USA ; Port Melbourne, Australia ; New Delhi, India ; Singapore |b Cambridge University Press |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XXV, 182 Seiten) |b Illustrationen, Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts challenges theoretical and empirical accounts about how state high courts use US Supreme Court doctrine and precedent. Michael Fix and Benjamin Kassow argue that theories that do not account for the full range of ways in which state high courts can act are, by definition, incomplete. Examining three important precedents - Atkins v. Virginia, Lemon v. Kurtzman, and DC v. Heller/McDonald v. Chicago - Fix and Kassow find that state high courts commonly ignore Supreme Court precedent for reasons of political ideology, path dependence, and fact patterns in cases that may be of varying similarity to those found in relevant US Supreme Court doctrine. This work, which provides an important addition to the scholarly literature on the impact of Supreme Court decisions, should be read by anyone interested in law and politics or traditional approaches to the study of legal decision-making | ||
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States / Supreme Court / Influence |
| 650 | 4 | |a Courts of last resort / United States / States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial process / United States / States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Federal government / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stare decisis / United States | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kassow, Benjamin J. |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1218257040 |4 aut | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 978-1-108-83563-3 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-1-108-81297-9 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO |a ZDB-20-CPI | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032321032 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141 |l FUBA1 |p ZDB-20-CPI |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141 |l UBA01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804181792515686400 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Fix, Michael P. 1980- Kassow, Benjamin J. ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1218257458 (DE-588)1218257040 |
| author_facet | Fix, Michael P. 1980- Kassow, Benjamin J. ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Fix, Michael P. 1980- |
| author_variant | m p f mp mpf b j k bj bjk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046911603 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CPI |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108891141 (OCoLC)1197710140 (DE-599)BVBBV046911603 |
| dewey-full | 347.73/365 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.73/365 |
| dewey-search | 347.73/365 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.73 3365 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781108891141 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03203nmm a2200481 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046911603</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210104 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200924s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108891141</subfield><subfield code="c">epub</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-108-89114-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781108891141</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108891141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1197710140</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046911603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/365</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fix, Michael P.</subfield><subfield code="d">1980-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1218257458</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts</subfield><subfield code="c">Michael P. Fix (Georgia State University), Benjamin J. Kassow (University of North Dakota)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">U.S. Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, USA ; Port Melbourne, Australia ; New Delhi, India ; Singapore</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XXV, 182 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts challenges theoretical and empirical accounts about how state high courts use US Supreme Court doctrine and precedent. Michael Fix and Benjamin Kassow argue that theories that do not account for the full range of ways in which state high courts can act are, by definition, incomplete. Examining three important precedents - Atkins v. Virginia, Lemon v. Kurtzman, and DC v. Heller/McDonald v. Chicago - Fix and Kassow find that state high courts commonly ignore Supreme Court precedent for reasons of political ideology, path dependence, and fact patterns in cases that may be of varying similarity to those found in relevant US Supreme Court doctrine. This work, which provides an important addition to the scholarly literature on the impact of Supreme Court decisions, should be read by anyone interested in law and politics or traditional approaches to the study of legal decision-making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court / Influence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Courts of last resort / United States / States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process / United States / States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Federal government / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stare decisis / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kassow, Benjamin J.</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1218257040</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-83563-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-81297-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CPI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032321032</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141</subfield><subfield code="l">FUBA1</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CPI</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141</subfield><subfield code="l">UBA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV046911603 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T15:28:29Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:57:17Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108891141 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032321032 |
| oclc_num | 1197710140 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-188 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XXV, 182 Seiten) Illustrationen, Diagramme |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CPI ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Fix, Michael P. 1980- Verfasser (DE-588)1218257458 aut US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts Michael P. Fix (Georgia State University), Benjamin J. Kassow (University of North Dakota) U.S. Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, USA ; Port Melbourne, Australia ; New Delhi, India ; Singapore Cambridge University Press 2020 1 Online-Ressource (XXV, 182 Seiten) Illustrationen, Diagramme txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts challenges theoretical and empirical accounts about how state high courts use US Supreme Court doctrine and precedent. Michael Fix and Benjamin Kassow argue that theories that do not account for the full range of ways in which state high courts can act are, by definition, incomplete. Examining three important precedents - Atkins v. Virginia, Lemon v. Kurtzman, and DC v. Heller/McDonald v. Chicago - Fix and Kassow find that state high courts commonly ignore Supreme Court precedent for reasons of political ideology, path dependence, and fact patterns in cases that may be of varying similarity to those found in relevant US Supreme Court doctrine. This work, which provides an important addition to the scholarly literature on the impact of Supreme Court decisions, should be read by anyone interested in law and politics or traditional approaches to the study of legal decision-making United States / Supreme Court / Influence Courts of last resort / United States / States Judicial process / United States / States Federal government / United States Stare decisis / United States Kassow, Benjamin J. ca. 20./21. Jh. Verfasser (DE-588)1218257040 aut Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 978-1-108-83563-3 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-1-108-81297-9 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Fix, Michael P. 1980- Kassow, Benjamin J. ca. 20./21. Jh US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts United States / Supreme Court / Influence Courts of last resort / United States / States Judicial process / United States / States Federal government / United States Stare decisis / United States |
| title | US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts |
| title_alt | U.S. Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts |
| title_auth | US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts |
| title_exact_search | US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts |
| title_exact_search_txtP | US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts |
| title_full | US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts Michael P. Fix (Georgia State University), Benjamin J. Kassow (University of North Dakota) |
| title_fullStr | US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts Michael P. Fix (Georgia State University), Benjamin J. Kassow (University of North Dakota) |
| title_full_unstemmed | US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts Michael P. Fix (Georgia State University), Benjamin J. Kassow (University of North Dakota) |
| title_short | US Supreme Court doctrine in the state high courts |
| title_sort | us supreme court doctrine in the state high courts |
| topic | United States / Supreme Court / Influence Courts of last resort / United States / States Judicial process / United States / States Federal government / United States Stare decisis / United States |
| topic_facet | United States / Supreme Court / Influence Courts of last resort / United States / States Judicial process / United States / States Federal government / United States Stare decisis / United States |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fixmichaelp ussupremecourtdoctrineinthestatehighcourts AT kassowbenjaminj ussupremecourtdoctrineinthestatehighcourts |