Internet jurisdiction: law and practice
From a technological standpoint, geography is largely irrelevant. Data flows through the internet without regard for political borders or territories. Services, communication, and interaction can occur online between persons who may be in different countries. Illegal activities, like hacking, cybere...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2021
|
| Ausgabe: | First edition |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | From a technological standpoint, geography is largely irrelevant. Data flows through the internet without regard for political borders or territories. Services, communication, and interaction can occur online between persons who may be in different countries. Illegal activities, like hacking, cyberespionage, propagating terrorist propaganda, defamation, revenge porn, and illegal marketplaces may all be remotely targeted and accessed from various countries. As such, the internet has created an interesting and complex set of challenges for the concept of jurisdiction and conflicts of law. This title takes a comparative approach covering the EU, UK, US, Germany, and China.0Broken into four parts, this book delves into the notion of jurisdiction as it relates to the internet. Part I focuses on the different meanings of the concept of jurisdiction, from a legal and historical perspective, and distinguishing between the different branches of government. It will highlight the challenges created by the internet, including social media and cloud computing. Part II analyses criminal jurisdiction, in regards to both jurisdictions in cybercrime cases and jurisdictional issues relating to criminal investigations (access to the cloud) and enforcement. Part III examines jurisdiction and applicable law in civil and commercial matters, such as e-commerce B2B and B2C contracts, torts typically occurring online, and online defamation and privacy infringement. Finally, Part IV looks at regulatory jurisdiction, examining the power of the executive (whether an arm of government or independent regulator) to apply and enforce national law. It will look at aspects like the provision of online audio-visual media services and online gambling services, both of which are heavily regulated, but which can be easily provided remotely from different jurisdictions |
| Beschreibung: | lviii, 485 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9780198806929 0198806922 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000008c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046898273 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210802 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 200914s2021 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780198806929 |9 978-0-19-880692-9 | ||
| 020 | |a 0198806922 |9 0-19-880692-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1250470603 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1730486509 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-739 |a DE-20 | ||
| 084 | |a PZ 3250 |0 (DE-625)141166: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hörnle, Julia |d 1970- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)137549393 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Internet jurisdiction |b law and practice |c Julia Hörnle |
| 250 | |a First edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Oxford University Press |c 2021 | |
| 300 | |a lviii, 485 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a From a technological standpoint, geography is largely irrelevant. Data flows through the internet without regard for political borders or territories. Services, communication, and interaction can occur online between persons who may be in different countries. Illegal activities, like hacking, cyberespionage, propagating terrorist propaganda, defamation, revenge porn, and illegal marketplaces may all be remotely targeted and accessed from various countries. As such, the internet has created an interesting and complex set of challenges for the concept of jurisdiction and conflicts of law. This title takes a comparative approach covering the EU, UK, US, Germany, and China.0Broken into four parts, this book delves into the notion of jurisdiction as it relates to the internet. Part I focuses on the different meanings of the concept of jurisdiction, from a legal and historical perspective, and distinguishing between the different branches of government. It will highlight the challenges created by the internet, including social media and cloud computing. Part II analyses criminal jurisdiction, in regards to both jurisdictions in cybercrime cases and jurisdictional issues relating to criminal investigations (access to the cloud) and enforcement. Part III examines jurisdiction and applicable law in civil and commercial matters, such as e-commerce B2B and B2C contracts, torts typically occurring online, and online defamation and privacy infringement. Finally, Part IV looks at regulatory jurisdiction, examining the power of the executive (whether an arm of government or independent regulator) to apply and enforce national law. It will look at aspects like the provision of online audio-visual media services and online gambling services, both of which are heavily regulated, but which can be easily provided remotely from different jurisdictions | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsgeltung |0 (DE-588)4124033-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internet |0 (DE-588)4308416-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Internet |0 (DE-588)4308416-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtsgeltung |0 (DE-588)4124033-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032307982&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032307982 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804181767757758464 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CASES XXI
TABLE OF LEGISLATION XXXIX
1. A BRIEF INTRODUCTION 1
2. HEAD IN THE CLOUDS : THE CLASH BETWEEN TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY,
JURISDICTION, AND THE TERRITORIAL DETACHMENT OF THE INTERNET 4
1. DIFFERENT CONTEXTS OF THE TERM JURISDICTION 4
2. STATE SOVEREIGNTY 7
3. STATE SOVEREIGNTY, NATIONAL IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION
10
4. GLOBAL LAW? 15
5. NEXUS TO TERRITORY: TERRITORIALITY, INTERESTS, AND CONNECTING
FACTORS;
EXTRATERRITORIALITY 20
3. THE JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE ANSWERED*ENFORCEMENT THROUGH
GATEKEEPERS ON THE INTERNET 3 3
1. THE OUT-OF-REACH PROBLEM 33
2. INTERNET GATEKEEPERS AS FACILITATORS OF ILLEGAL ACTIVITY? 35
3. ONLINE SERVICE PROVIDER LIABILITY AS GATEKEEPERS? 36
4. THE USE OF GATEKEEPER LEGISLATION FOR SPECIFIC TYPES OF CONTENT 41
4.1 HOSTING: FROM NOTICE AND TAKE DOWN TO DUTY OF CARE 41
4.1.1 CSEA MATERIALS 41
4.1.2 TERRORISM-RELATED MATERIALS 42
4.1.3 ONLINE GAMBLING AND NOTICE AND TAKE DOWN 49
4.1.4 WIDER RANGE OF CONTENTS 50
4.1.4.1 THE GERMAN NETZWERKDURCHSETZUNGSGESETZ (NETZDG) 50
4.1.4.2 AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA SERVICES DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/1808 53
4.1.4.3 THE UK WHITE PAPER ONLINE HARMS 2019 56
4.1.4.4 AUSTRALIA 58
4.1.4.4.1 SCHEDULES 5 AND 7 BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992 58
4.1.4.4.2 CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (SHARING OF
ABHORRENT VIOLENT MATERIAL) ACT 2019 58
4.1.5 CONTENT REGULATION POINT TWO: HOSTING AS GATEKEEPING 61
4.2 INTERNET ACCESS PROVIDERS AS LOCAL GATEKEEPERS*BLOCKING 65
4.2.1 BLOCKING OF CSEA 67
4.2.2 BLOCKING OF TERRORIST CONTENT 67
4.2.3 PORNOGRAPHY AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY ACT 2017 68
4.2.4 WEBSITE BLOCKING AND GAMBLING 68
4.2.5 UK WHITE PAPER ONLINE HARMS AND WEBSITE BLOCKING 69
4.2.6 AUSTRALIA AND INTERNET ACCESS BLOCKING 70
XIV TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.3 PAYMENT SERVICES PROVIDERS, ADVERTISERS, AND SEARCH ENGINES
AS GATEKEEPERS 70
4.3.1 DIGITALECONOMYACT2017ANDTHEWHITEPAPER ONLINEHARMS 71
4.3.2 PAYMENT BLOCKING OF ILLEGAL GAMBLING PAYMENTS 71
5. CONCLUSION 78
4. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION*CONCURRENT JURISDICTION, SOVEREIGNTY,
AND THE URGENT REQUIREMENT FOR COORDINATION 81
JULIA HORNLE AND ELIFMENDOS KUSKONMAZ
1. INTRODUCTION 81
2. JURISDICTION UNDER (PUBLIC) INTERNATIONAL LAW 82
2.1 THE TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE AND EFFECTS DOCTRINE 83
2.2 PRINCIPLES OF EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 87
2.2.1 PERSONALITY PRINCIPLE 87
2.2.2 PROTECTIVE PRINCIPLE 89
2.2.3 UNIVERSALITY PRINCIPLE 89
3. DEVELOPING PRINCIPLES FOR CYBERCRIME: TERRITORIAL AND
EXTRATERRITORIAL LAWS 90
3.1 TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE IN EXERCISING JURISDICTION OVER CYBERCRIMES
91
3.2 EXTRATERRITORIAL LAWS IN PRESCRIBING CYBERCRIMES 95
4. RESOLVING JURISDICTION CONFLICTS FOR CYBERCRIMES: LIMITING THE
ASSERTION OF
JURISDICTION AND COORDINATING CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT 96
4.1 INTERNATIONAL COMITY AND THE REASONABLENESS PRINCIPLES 96
4.2 EU CRIMINAL LAW COORDINATION 99
5. NE BIS IN IDEM, THE RULE AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY 107
6. CONCLUSION 113
5. JURISDICTION OF THE CRIMINAL COURTS IN CYBERCRIME CASES
IN GERMANY AND ENGLAND 115
1. JURISDICTION UNDER GERMAN CRIMINAL LAW 116
1.1 INTRODUCTION 116
1.2 TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE AS THE MAIN BASIS FOR JURISDICTION 117
1.3 PROTECTING PARTICULAR GERMAN INTERESTS, FREQUENTLY COMBINED WITH
THE ACTIVE AND PASSIVE PERSONALITY PRINCIPLE FOR A LIMITED NUMBER
OF SPECIFIED OFFENCES (PROTECTIVE PRINCIPLE) 122
1.3.1 NATIONAL STATE INTERESTS 123
1.3.2 GERMAN PUBLIC INTERESTS 125
1.3.3 PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL INTERESTS 126
1.4 UNIVERSALITY PRINCIPLE (WELTRECHTSPRINZIP) 127
1.5 PASSIVE PERSONALITY PRINCIPLE 130
1.6 ACTIVE PERSONALITY PRINCIPLE 131
1.7 REPRESENTATION PRINCIPLE 132
2. JURISDICTION UNDER ENGLISH CRIMINAL LAW 132
2.1 PREVALENCE OF TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE 132
2.2 THE TERMINATORY APPROACH OR LAST ACT RULE 136
2.3 SUBSTANTIAL MEASURE TEST 137
2.4 INCHOATE OFFENCES 140
2.5 COMPUTER MISUSE OFFENCES AND JURISDICTION 141
3. CONCLUSION 143
TABLE OF CONTENTS XV
6. DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS IN THE CLOUD*CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT
COOPERATION 145
1. INTRODUCTION 145
2. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS 151
2.1 AD HOC COOPERATION AND TREATY-BASED INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION: MLA
151
2.2 THE CYBERCRIME CONVENTION: MULTILATERAL COOPERATION 159
3. INTRA-EU COOPERATION IN DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS 163
3.1 MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND MUTUAL TRUST IN THE EU: HOW DOES CRIMINAL
ENFORCEMENT JURISDICTION IN THE EU LEGAL ORDER RELATE
TO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS? 163
3.2 SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTS FOR EU COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL
INVESTIGATIONS 170
3.2.1 EUROPEAN INVESTIGATION ORDER 170
3.2.2 JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS (JITS) 175
3.2.3 INTRA-EU INSTITUTIONAL COOPERATION 177
3.2.3.1 EUROPOL AND EUROPOL S CYBERCRIME CENTRE 177
3.2.3.2 EUROJUST 177
4. EXPORT OF DATA FROM THE EU 179
4.1 THE EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ITS WORKAROUNDS 179
4.1.1 ADEQUACY 180
4.1.2 OTHER SAFEGUARD MECHANISMS 182
4.1.3 DEROGATIONS 183
4.2 THE DIFFERENT PERMUTATIONS OF THE DILEMMA 188
4.3 SAFE HARBOR, THE PRIVACY SHIELD AND SCHREMSL AND II 191
4.4 US-EU UMBRELLA FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT 195
5. CROSS-BORDER ACCESS TO DATA FOR DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS*EXTENDING
JURISDICTION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW? 197
5.1 USING COERCIVE POWERS UNDER DOMESTIC CRIMINAL PROCEDURES 197
5.1.1 DOMESTIC CRIMINAL PROCEDURES ACHIEVING DIRECT DISCLOSURE
OF FOREIGN STORED DATA BY ISPS 197
5.1.1.1 DOMESTIC ISP CONTROLS DATA, BUT NOT DATA IN FOREIGN
LOCATIONS, US MICROSOFT CASE AND THE CLOUD ACT 198
5.1.1.2 FOREIGN ISP CONTROLS DATA IN FOREIGN LOCATIONS 201
5.1.1.3 GUIDANCE NOTE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 18
PRODUCTION ORDERS 203
5.1.2 REMOTE SEARCH AND SEIZURE AND THE USE OF OSINT AUTHORIZED
UNDER DOMESTIC CRIMINAL PROCEDURES 206
5.1.2.1 REMOTE SEARCH AND SEIZURE*HACKING BY LAW ENFORCEMENT 206
5.1.2.2 ACCESS TO OPEN SOURCE MATERIALS: ARTICLE 32(A)
OF THE CYBERCRIME CONVENTION 209
5.2 EXTENDING JURISDICTION THROUGH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT FOR
DISCLOSURE OF DATA 211
5.2.1 THE CLOUD ACT AND EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS 211
5.2.2 THE EU E-EVIDENCE REGULATION (PROPOSAL) 215
5.3 VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE BY ISPS 220
5.3.1 DIRECT, VOLUNTARY INFORMAL COOPERATION WITH FOREIGN
SERVICE PROVIDERS 220
XVI TABLE OF CONTENTS
5.3.2 ACCESS*VOLUNTARY AND LAWFUL: ARTICLE 32(B) CYBERCRIME
CONVENTION 222
6. DATA SOVEREIGNTY AND DATA LOCALIZATION 223
7. DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS, JURISDICTION, AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF
CITIZENS 226
8. CONCLUSION 230
7. DATA PROTECTION REGULATION AND JURISDICTION 233
1. INTRODUCTION 233
2. APPLICABLE LAW VERSUS JURISDICTION 235
3. SPECIFIC RULES ON THE COMPETENCE OF THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIES IN
EU DATA PROTECTION LAW 237
3.1 DATA PROTECTION DIRECTIVE 1995/46/EC 237
3.2 GDPREU/2016/679 240
3.2.1 ONE STOP SHOP 240
3.2.2 COMPETENCE OF DATA PROTECTION AUTHORITIES*JURISDICTION 241
3.2.3 COOPERATION OBLIGATION OF THE MEMBER STATES, THE CONSISTENCY
MECHANISM AND THE EDPB 242
4. RULES ON APPLICABLE LAW 243
4.1 ESTABLISHMENT LINK IN THE DIRECTIVE AND THE REGULATION 244
4.1.1 THE CONCEPT OF ESTABLISHMENT IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE CJEU 245
4.1.2 IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ACTIVITIES OF AN ESTABLISHMENT OF THE
CONTROLLER 246
4.2 EQUIPMENT AS A TERRITORIAL LINK 250
4.3 DOMAIN NAMES AS A JURISDICTIONAL LINK AND GEO-BLOCKING 251
4.4 RESIDENCY AS A FURTHER REQUIREMENT BEFORE EU DATA PROTECTION
LAW APPLIES 253
4.5 TARGETING LINK IN THE REGULATION 254
4.6 APPLICATION OF EU LAW/MEMBER STATES LAW BY VIRTUE OF PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL LAW 255
5. GENERAL PRINCIPLES 255
5.1 THE TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE AND THE EFFECTS TEST 256
5.2 THE PROTECTIVE PRINCIPLE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW 258
5.3 THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN REGULATION PRINCIPLE 259
5.4 THE COUNTRY OF DESTINATION REGULATION PRINCIPLE, CONSUMER
PROTECTION LAW, AND THE TARGETING PRINCIPLE 260
6. CONCLUSION 261
8. CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL CASES IN THE EU: JURISDICTION, RECOGNITION,
AND ENFORCEMENT, APPLICABLE LAW*BRUSSELS REGULATION,
ROME I AND II REGULATIONS 264
JULIA HORNLE ANDLOANNIS REVOLIDIS
1. INTRODUCTION 264
1.1 THE INTERNET CHALLENGE AND EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 264
1.2 SOME CORE PRINCIPLES OFEU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 265
1.3 THE UK S POSITION AFTER BREXIT 268
2. SCOPE OF APPLICATION AND GENERAL RULES OF JURISDICTION AND LAW
APPLICABLE 269
2.1 CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS 269
TABLE OF CONTENTS XV11
2.2 THE CROSS-BORDER CHARACTER OF A CASE 269
2.3 SCOPE OF APPLICATION 270
2.4 THE CONTRACTUAL OR NON-CONTRACTUAL CHARACTER OF A CASE 271
2.5 THE RELATIONSHIP OF EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW WITH THE PRINCIPLE
OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN ESTABLISHED IN ARTICLE 3 E-COMMERCE DIRECTIVE 272
2.6 GENERAL RULE OF JURISDICTION UNDER THE BRUSSELS IBIS REGULATION 272
2.7 CHOICE AS A CONFLICT OF LAWS RULE FOR CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS UNDER
THE ROME I REGULATION 273
2.8 GENERAL CONFLICT OF LAWS RULE FOR NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
UNDER THE ROME II REGULATION 275
3. SPECIAL EU RULES OF JURISDICTION AND LAW APPLICABLE FOR
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS 276
3.1 OVERVIEW 276
3.2 PROROGATION UNDER ARTICLE 25 BRUSSELS IBIS 276
3.3 JURISDICTION*SPECIAL RULE OF ARTICLE 7(1) BRUSSELS IBIS 278
3.4 CHOICE OF LAW*ARTICLE 4 ROME I 284
4. SPECIAL EU RULES FOR JURISDICTION AND LAW APPLICABLE FOR
NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS 284
5. LISPENDENS AND RELATED ACTIONS 286
6. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 287
9. CONFLICTS OF LAW AND INTERNET JURISDICTION IN THE US 289
1. INTRODUCTION 289
2. ADJUDICATIVE JURISDICTION AND US PRINCIPLES 290
2.1 THE CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS CLAUSES AND LONG-ARM STATUES 290
2.2 MINIMUM CONTACTS AND NOTIONS OF FAIR PLAY AND SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE
293
2.3 PERSONAL JURISDICTION: GENERAL AND SPECIFIC 296
3. IN REM AND QUASI IN REM JURISDICTION 299
4. INTERNET CASES: JURISPRUDENCE 300
4.1 SPECIFIC PERSONAL JURISDICTION 300
4.2 CALDERV JONES AND EFFECTS DOCTRINE 305
4.3 STREAM OF COMMERCE CASES 309
4.4 JURISDICTION CLAUSES IN CONTRACTS 311
5. ADDITIONAL PRINCIPLES: FORUM NON-CONVENIENCE, COMITY,
AND REASONABLENESS 313
6. PROCEDURAL JURISDICTION FROM A US PERSPECTIVE 322
7. CONCLUSION 328
10. CONSUMER PROTECTION AND JURISDICTION 331
1. INTRODUCTION 331
2. THE APPROACH TO FORUM SELECTION AND CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE US 333
2.1 THE CONTRACTUAL ANALYSIS: PARTY AUTONOMY AND MUTUALITY IN THE US 333
2.2 UNCONSCIONABLE CLAUSES IN ADHESION CONTRACTS: PROCEDURAL
AND SUBSTANTIVE UNCONSCIONABILITY (INCORPORATION AND FAIRNESS) 336
2.2.1 PROCEDURAL UNCONSCIONABILITY 337
2.2.2 SUBSTANTIVE UNCONSCIONABILITY 340
XV111 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.3 CONTRAVENING STRONG PUBLIC POLICY IN THE FORUM 341
2.4 CONCLUSION: US LAW 344
3. EU CONSUMER JURISDICTION 345
3.1 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE HARMONIZATION OF THE RULES ON PRIVATE
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SPECIAL CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE EU 345
3.2 CONSUMER PROTECTION RULES IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE EU 347
3.3 INTERPRETATION BY THE CJEU 352
3.3.1 WHO IS A CONSUMER AND WHEN IS A CONTRACT CONCLUDED? 353
3.3.2 CLOSELY LINKED CONTRACTS 357
3.3.3 INTERACTION OF THE CONSUMER JURISDICTION RULES AND THE
NATIONAL CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES IN DETERMINING THE VENUE 359
3.3.4 THE DIRECTING/TARGETING RULE AND E-COMMERCE 361
4. CONCLUSION 367
11. CONFLICTS OF LAW IN PRIVACY, DATA PROTECTION, AND DEFAMATION
DISPUTES: GERMAN AND ENGLISH LAW 369
1. INTRODUCTION 369
2. JURISDICTION 370
2.1 HARMONIZED RULES ON JURISDICTION IN THE BRUSSELS (RECAST) REGULATION
370
2.2 JURISDICTIONAL RULES IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION 378
2.3 JURISDICTION UNDER GERMAN LAW 380
2.4 RULES OF JURISDICTION UNDER ENGLISH COMMON LAW 386
2.5 CONCLUSION: JURISDICTION 392
3. APPLICABLE LAW 393
3.1 APPLICABLE LAW UNDER THE ROME II REGULATION ON THE LAW
APPLICABLE TO NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS 393
3.2 APPLICABLE LAW UNDER GERMAN LAW 394
3.3 APPLICABLE LAW UNDER ENGLISH LAW 396
3.3.1 APPLICABLE LAW TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS INFRINGEMENTS OTHER
THAN DEFAMATION 397
3.3.2 APPLICABLE LAW TO DEFAMATION 399
3.3.3 CONCLUSION: APPLICABLE LAW 402
4. CONCLUSION 403
12. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY*INTERNET JURISDICTION AND APPLICABLE LAW 406
1. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND TERRITORIALITY 406
2. DOMAIN NAMES AND IN REM JURISDICTION 408
3. JURISDICTION IN THE EU AND UK 411
3.1 HARMONIZED EU JURISDICTION RULES AND IP 412
3.1.1 PERSONAL JURISDICTION*SPECIAL TORT RULE IN IP INFRINGEMENT CASES
413
3.1.2 IN REM, SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION AND ITS INTERPLAY WITH
PERSONAL JURISDICTION 418
3.2 ENGLISH JURISDICTION RULES 420
3.3 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, UNREGISTERED RIGHTS, AND SUBJECT-MATTER
JURISDICTION 420
TABLE OF CONTENTS XIX
3.4 THE EU TRADEMARK REGULATION, COMMUNITY DESIGN REGULATION
AND EUROPEAN PATENT 423
3.4.1 THE EU TRADEMARK REGULATION AND COMMUNITY
DESIGN REGULATION 423
3.4.2 EUROPEAN PATENTS 428
4. APPLICABLE LAW IN THE EU AND UK 429
4.1 ROME REGULATION 429
4.2 COPYRIGHT: BERNE CONVENTION 431
4.3 CASELAW OF THE ENGLISH COURTS 433
5. CONCLUSION 434
13. CONCLUSION 436
1. JURISDICTION AND DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES*THE JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE
436
2. GLOBALIZATION AND IDENTITY 437
3. CONNECTING FACTORS AND TERRITORIALITY 437
4. WORLDWIDE REMEDIES OR LOCALIZED REMEDIES? 440
5. ENFORCEMENT: THE ROLE OF PRIVATE GATEKEEPERS 441
6. CHANGING THE TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE: CLOSED SYSTEMS AND THEIR
INTERFACES 442
7. RULE-LEVEL CHANGES 443
7.1 TARGETING AND DIRECTING 443
7.2 JURISDICTIONAL RESTRAINT: COMITY, EXTRATERRITORIALITY, AND
REASONABLENESS 446
8. SYSTEMIC CHANGES 446
8.1 COORDINATION, COORDINATION, COORDINATION 447
8.2 GEO-LOCATION AND GEO-BLOCKING 448
8.3 PRIVATE LAW SYSTEMS: DEPLETING SOVEREIGNTY AND STATES WITHIN STATES
450
9. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JURISDICTION, THE RULE OF LAW,
AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 451
INDEX 453
|
| adam_txt |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CASES XXI
TABLE OF LEGISLATION XXXIX
1. A BRIEF INTRODUCTION 1
2. "HEAD IN THE CLOUDS": THE CLASH BETWEEN TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY,
JURISDICTION, AND THE TERRITORIAL DETACHMENT OF THE INTERNET 4
1. DIFFERENT CONTEXTS OF THE TERM "JURISDICTION" 4
2. STATE SOVEREIGNTY 7
3. STATE SOVEREIGNTY, NATIONAL IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION
10
4. GLOBAL LAW? 15
5. NEXUS TO TERRITORY: TERRITORIALITY, INTERESTS, AND CONNECTING
FACTORS;
EXTRATERRITORIALITY 20
3. THE JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE ANSWERED*ENFORCEMENT THROUGH
GATEKEEPERS ON THE INTERNET 3 3
1. THE "OUT-OF-REACH" PROBLEM 33
2. INTERNET GATEKEEPERS AS FACILITATORS OF ILLEGAL ACTIVITY? 35
3. ONLINE SERVICE PROVIDER LIABILITY AS GATEKEEPERS? 36
4. THE USE OF GATEKEEPER LEGISLATION FOR SPECIFIC TYPES OF CONTENT 41
4.1 HOSTING: FROM NOTICE AND TAKE DOWN TO DUTY OF CARE 41
4.1.1 CSEA MATERIALS 41
4.1.2 TERRORISM-RELATED MATERIALS 42
4.1.3 ONLINE GAMBLING AND NOTICE AND TAKE DOWN 49
4.1.4 WIDER RANGE OF CONTENTS 50
4.1.4.1 THE GERMAN NETZWERKDURCHSETZUNGSGESETZ (NETZDG) 50
4.1.4.2 AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA SERVICES DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/1808 53
4.1.4.3 THE UK WHITE PAPER "ONLINE HARMS" 2019 56
4.1.4.4 AUSTRALIA 58
4.1.4.4.1 SCHEDULES 5 AND 7 BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992 58
4.1.4.4.2 CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (SHARING OF
ABHORRENT VIOLENT MATERIAL) ACT 2019 58
4.1.5 CONTENT REGULATION POINT TWO: HOSTING AS GATEKEEPING 61
4.2 INTERNET ACCESS PROVIDERS AS LOCAL GATEKEEPERS*BLOCKING 65
4.2.1 BLOCKING OF CSEA 67
4.2.2 BLOCKING OF TERRORIST CONTENT 67
4.2.3 PORNOGRAPHY AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY ACT 2017 68
4.2.4 WEBSITE BLOCKING AND GAMBLING 68
4.2.5 UK WHITE PAPER "ONLINE HARMS" AND WEBSITE BLOCKING 69
4.2.6 AUSTRALIA AND INTERNET ACCESS BLOCKING 70
XIV TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.3 PAYMENT SERVICES PROVIDERS, ADVERTISERS, AND SEARCH ENGINES
AS GATEKEEPERS 70
4.3.1 DIGITALECONOMYACT2017ANDTHEWHITEPAPER"ONLINEHARMS" 71
4.3.2 PAYMENT BLOCKING OF ILLEGAL GAMBLING PAYMENTS 71
5. CONCLUSION 78
4. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION*CONCURRENT JURISDICTION, SOVEREIGNTY,
AND THE URGENT REQUIREMENT FOR COORDINATION 81
JULIA HORNLE AND ELIFMENDOS KUSKONMAZ
1. INTRODUCTION 81
2. JURISDICTION UNDER (PUBLIC) INTERNATIONAL LAW 82
2.1 THE TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE AND EFFECTS DOCTRINE 83
2.2 PRINCIPLES OF EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 87
2.2.1 PERSONALITY PRINCIPLE 87
2.2.2 PROTECTIVE PRINCIPLE 89
2.2.3 UNIVERSALITY PRINCIPLE 89
3. DEVELOPING PRINCIPLES FOR CYBERCRIME: TERRITORIAL AND
EXTRATERRITORIAL LAWS 90
3.1 TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE IN EXERCISING JURISDICTION OVER CYBERCRIMES
91
3.2 EXTRATERRITORIAL LAWS IN PRESCRIBING CYBERCRIMES 95
4. RESOLVING JURISDICTION CONFLICTS FOR CYBERCRIMES: LIMITING THE
ASSERTION OF
JURISDICTION AND COORDINATING CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT 96
4.1 INTERNATIONAL COMITY AND THE REASONABLENESS PRINCIPLES 96
4.2 EU CRIMINAL LAW COORDINATION 99
5. NE BIS IN IDEM, THE RULE AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY 107
6. CONCLUSION 113
5. JURISDICTION OF THE CRIMINAL COURTS IN CYBERCRIME CASES
IN GERMANY AND ENGLAND 115
1. JURISDICTION UNDER GERMAN CRIMINAL LAW 116
1.1 INTRODUCTION 116
1.2 TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE AS THE MAIN BASIS FOR JURISDICTION 117
1.3 PROTECTING PARTICULAR GERMAN INTERESTS, FREQUENTLY COMBINED WITH
THE ACTIVE AND PASSIVE PERSONALITY PRINCIPLE FOR A LIMITED NUMBER
OF SPECIFIED OFFENCES (PROTECTIVE PRINCIPLE) 122
1.3.1 NATIONAL STATE INTERESTS 123
1.3.2 GERMAN PUBLIC INTERESTS 125
1.3.3 PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL INTERESTS 126
1.4 UNIVERSALITY PRINCIPLE (WELTRECHTSPRINZIP) 127
1.5 PASSIVE PERSONALITY PRINCIPLE 130
1.6 ACTIVE PERSONALITY PRINCIPLE 131
1.7 REPRESENTATION PRINCIPLE 132
2. JURISDICTION UNDER ENGLISH CRIMINAL LAW 132
2.1 PREVALENCE OF TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE 132
2.2 THE TERMINATORY APPROACH OR LAST ACT RULE 136
2.3 SUBSTANTIAL MEASURE TEST 137
2.4 INCHOATE OFFENCES 140
2.5 COMPUTER MISUSE OFFENCES AND JURISDICTION 141
3. CONCLUSION 143
TABLE OF CONTENTS XV
6. DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS IN THE CLOUD*CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT
COOPERATION 145
1. INTRODUCTION 145
2. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS 151
2.1 AD HOC COOPERATION AND TREATY-BASED INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION: MLA
151
2.2 THE CYBERCRIME CONVENTION: MULTILATERAL COOPERATION 159
3. INTRA-EU COOPERATION IN DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS 163
3.1 MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND MUTUAL TRUST IN THE EU: HOW DOES CRIMINAL
ENFORCEMENT JURISDICTION IN THE EU LEGAL ORDER RELATE
TO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS? 163
3.2 SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTS FOR EU COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL
INVESTIGATIONS 170
3.2.1 EUROPEAN INVESTIGATION ORDER 170
3.2.2 JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS (JITS) 175
3.2.3 INTRA-EU INSTITUTIONAL COOPERATION 177
3.2.3.1 EUROPOL AND EUROPOL'S CYBERCRIME CENTRE 177
3.2.3.2 EUROJUST 177
4. EXPORT OF DATA FROM THE EU 179
4.1 THE EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ITS WORKAROUNDS 179
4.1.1 ADEQUACY 180
4.1.2 OTHER SAFEGUARD MECHANISMS 182
4.1.3 DEROGATIONS 183
4.2 THE DIFFERENT PERMUTATIONS OF THE DILEMMA 188
4.3 SAFE HARBOR, THE PRIVACY SHIELD AND SCHREMSL AND II 191
4.4 US-EU UMBRELLA FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT 195
5. CROSS-BORDER ACCESS TO DATA FOR DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS*EXTENDING
JURISDICTION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW? 197
5.1 USING COERCIVE POWERS UNDER DOMESTIC CRIMINAL PROCEDURES 197
5.1.1 DOMESTIC CRIMINAL PROCEDURES ACHIEVING DIRECT DISCLOSURE
OF FOREIGN STORED DATA BY ISPS 197
5.1.1.1 DOMESTIC ISP CONTROLS DATA, BUT NOT DATA IN FOREIGN
LOCATIONS, US MICROSOFT CASE AND THE CLOUD ACT 198
5.1.1.2 FOREIGN ISP CONTROLS DATA IN FOREIGN LOCATIONS 201
5.1.1.3 GUIDANCE NOTE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 18
PRODUCTION ORDERS 203
5.1.2 REMOTE SEARCH AND SEIZURE AND THE USE OF OSINT AUTHORIZED
UNDER DOMESTIC CRIMINAL PROCEDURES 206
5.1.2.1 REMOTE SEARCH AND SEIZURE*HACKING BY LAW ENFORCEMENT 206
5.1.2.2 ACCESS TO OPEN SOURCE MATERIALS: ARTICLE 32(A)
OF THE CYBERCRIME CONVENTION 209
5.2 EXTENDING JURISDICTION THROUGH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT FOR
DISCLOSURE OF DATA 211
5.2.1 THE CLOUD ACT AND EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS 211
5.2.2 THE EU E-EVIDENCE REGULATION (PROPOSAL) 215
5.3 VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE BY ISPS 220
5.3.1 DIRECT, "VOLUNTARY" INFORMAL COOPERATION WITH FOREIGN
SERVICE PROVIDERS 220
XVI TABLE OF CONTENTS
5.3.2 ACCESS*VOLUNTARY AND LAWFUL: ARTICLE 32(B) CYBERCRIME
CONVENTION 222
6. DATA SOVEREIGNTY AND DATA LOCALIZATION 223
7. DIGITAL INVESTIGATIONS, JURISDICTION, AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF
CITIZENS 226
8. CONCLUSION 230
7. DATA PROTECTION REGULATION AND JURISDICTION 233
1. INTRODUCTION 233
2. APPLICABLE LAW VERSUS JURISDICTION 235
3. SPECIFIC RULES ON THE COMPETENCE OF THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIES IN
EU DATA PROTECTION LAW 237
3.1 DATA PROTECTION DIRECTIVE 1995/46/EC 237
3.2 GDPREU/2016/679 240
3.2.1 ONE STOP SHOP 240
3.2.2 COMPETENCE OF DATA PROTECTION AUTHORITIES*JURISDICTION 241
3.2.3 COOPERATION OBLIGATION OF THE MEMBER STATES, THE CONSISTENCY
MECHANISM AND THE EDPB 242
4. RULES ON APPLICABLE LAW 243
4.1 ESTABLISHMENT LINK IN THE DIRECTIVE AND THE REGULATION 244
4.1.1 THE CONCEPT OF ESTABLISHMENT IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE CJEU 245
4.1.2 IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ACTIVITIES OF AN ESTABLISHMENT OF THE
CONTROLLER 246
4.2 EQUIPMENT AS A TERRITORIAL LINK 250
4.3 DOMAIN NAMES AS A JURISDICTIONAL LINK AND GEO-BLOCKING 251
4.4 RESIDENCY AS A FURTHER REQUIREMENT BEFORE EU DATA PROTECTION
LAW APPLIES 253
4.5 TARGETING LINK IN THE REGULATION 254
4.6 APPLICATION OF EU LAW/MEMBER STATES' LAW BY VIRTUE OF PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL LAW 255
5. GENERAL PRINCIPLES 255
5.1 THE TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE AND THE EFFECTS TEST 256
5.2 THE PROTECTIVE PRINCIPLE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW 258
5.3 THE "COUNTRY OF ORIGIN" REGULATION PRINCIPLE 259
5.4 THE "COUNTRY OF DESTINATION" REGULATION PRINCIPLE, CONSUMER
PROTECTION LAW, AND THE TARGETING PRINCIPLE 260
6. CONCLUSION 261
8. CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL CASES IN THE EU: JURISDICTION, RECOGNITION,
AND ENFORCEMENT, APPLICABLE LAW*BRUSSELS REGULATION,
ROME I AND II REGULATIONS 264
JULIA HORNLE ANDLOANNIS REVOLIDIS
1. INTRODUCTION 264
1.1 THE INTERNET CHALLENGE AND EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 264
1.2 SOME CORE PRINCIPLES OFEU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 265
1.3 THE UK'S POSITION AFTER BREXIT 268
2. SCOPE OF APPLICATION AND GENERAL RULES OF JURISDICTION AND LAW
APPLICABLE 269
2.1 CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS 269
TABLE OF CONTENTS XV11
2.2 THE CROSS-BORDER CHARACTER OF A CASE 269
2.3 SCOPE OF APPLICATION 270
2.4 THE CONTRACTUAL OR NON-CONTRACTUAL CHARACTER OF A CASE 271
2.5 THE RELATIONSHIP OF EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW WITH THE "PRINCIPLE
OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN" ESTABLISHED IN ARTICLE 3 E-COMMERCE DIRECTIVE 272
2.6 GENERAL RULE OF JURISDICTION UNDER THE BRUSSELS IBIS REGULATION 272
2.7 CHOICE AS A CONFLICT OF LAWS RULE FOR CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS UNDER
THE ROME I REGULATION 273
2.8 GENERAL CONFLICT OF LAWS RULE FOR NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
UNDER THE ROME II REGULATION 275
3. SPECIAL EU RULES OF JURISDICTION AND LAW APPLICABLE FOR
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS 276
3.1 OVERVIEW 276
3.2 PROROGATION UNDER ARTICLE 25 BRUSSELS IBIS 276
3.3 JURISDICTION*SPECIAL RULE OF ARTICLE 7(1) BRUSSELS IBIS 278
3.4 CHOICE OF LAW*ARTICLE 4 ROME I 284
4. SPECIAL EU RULES FOR JURISDICTION AND LAW APPLICABLE FOR
NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS 284
5. LISPENDENS AND RELATED ACTIONS 286
6. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 287
9. CONFLICTS OF LAW AND INTERNET JURISDICTION IN THE US 289
1. INTRODUCTION 289
2. ADJUDICATIVE JURISDICTION AND US PRINCIPLES 290
2.1 THE CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS CLAUSES AND LONG-ARM STATUES 290
2.2 "MINIMUM CONTACTS" AND NOTIONS OF FAIR PLAY AND SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE
293
2.3 PERSONAL JURISDICTION: GENERAL AND SPECIFIC 296
3. IN REM AND QUASI IN REM JURISDICTION 299
4. INTERNET CASES: JURISPRUDENCE 300
4.1 SPECIFIC PERSONAL JURISDICTION 300
4.2 CALDERV JONES AND "EFFECTS DOCTRINE" 305
4.3 STREAM OF COMMERCE CASES 309
4.4 JURISDICTION CLAUSES IN CONTRACTS 311
5. ADDITIONAL PRINCIPLES: FORUM NON-CONVENIENCE, COMITY,
AND REASONABLENESS 313
6. PROCEDURAL JURISDICTION FROM A US PERSPECTIVE 322
7. CONCLUSION 328
10. CONSUMER PROTECTION AND JURISDICTION 331
1. INTRODUCTION 331
2. THE APPROACH TO FORUM SELECTION AND CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE US 333
2.1 THE CONTRACTUAL ANALYSIS: PARTY AUTONOMY AND MUTUALITY IN THE US 333
2.2 UNCONSCIONABLE CLAUSES IN ADHESION CONTRACTS: PROCEDURAL
AND SUBSTANTIVE UNCONSCIONABILITY (INCORPORATION AND FAIRNESS) 336
2.2.1 PROCEDURAL UNCONSCIONABILITY 337
2.2.2 SUBSTANTIVE UNCONSCIONABILITY 340
XV111 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.3 CONTRAVENING STRONG PUBLIC POLICY IN THE FORUM 341
2.4 CONCLUSION: US LAW 344
3. EU CONSUMER JURISDICTION 345
3.1 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE HARMONIZATION OF THE RULES ON PRIVATE
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SPECIAL CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE EU 345
3.2 CONSUMER PROTECTION RULES IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE EU 347
3.3 INTERPRETATION BY THE CJEU 352
3.3.1 WHO IS A CONSUMER AND WHEN IS A CONTRACT CONCLUDED? 353
3.3.2 CLOSELY LINKED CONTRACTS 357
3.3.3 INTERACTION OF THE CONSUMER JURISDICTION RULES AND THE
NATIONAL CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES IN DETERMINING THE VENUE 359
3.3.4 THE DIRECTING/TARGETING RULE AND E-COMMERCE 361
4. CONCLUSION 367
11. CONFLICTS OF LAW IN PRIVACY, DATA PROTECTION, AND DEFAMATION
DISPUTES: GERMAN AND ENGLISH LAW 369
1. INTRODUCTION 369
2. JURISDICTION 370
2.1 HARMONIZED RULES ON JURISDICTION IN THE BRUSSELS (RECAST) REGULATION
370
2.2 JURISDICTIONAL RULES IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION 378
2.3 JURISDICTION UNDER GERMAN LAW 380
2.4 RULES OF JURISDICTION UNDER ENGLISH COMMON LAW 386
2.5 CONCLUSION: JURISDICTION 392
3. APPLICABLE LAW 393
3.1 APPLICABLE LAW UNDER THE ROME II REGULATION ON THE LAW
APPLICABLE TO NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS 393
3.2 APPLICABLE LAW UNDER GERMAN LAW 394
3.3 APPLICABLE LAW UNDER ENGLISH LAW 396
3.3.1 APPLICABLE LAW TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS INFRINGEMENTS OTHER
THAN DEFAMATION 397
3.3.2 APPLICABLE LAW TO DEFAMATION 399
3.3.3 CONCLUSION: APPLICABLE LAW 402
4. CONCLUSION 403
12. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY*INTERNET JURISDICTION AND APPLICABLE LAW 406
1. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND TERRITORIALITY 406
2. DOMAIN NAMES AND IN REM JURISDICTION 408
3. JURISDICTION IN THE EU AND UK 411
3.1 HARMONIZED EU JURISDICTION RULES AND IP 412
3.1.1 PERSONAL JURISDICTION*SPECIAL TORT RULE IN IP INFRINGEMENT CASES
413
3.1.2 IN REM, SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION AND ITS INTERPLAY WITH
PERSONAL JURISDICTION 418
3.2 ENGLISH JURISDICTION RULES 420
3.3 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, UNREGISTERED RIGHTS, AND SUBJECT-MATTER
JURISDICTION 420
TABLE OF CONTENTS XIX
3.4 THE EU TRADEMARK REGULATION, COMMUNITY DESIGN REGULATION
AND EUROPEAN PATENT 423
3.4.1 THE EU TRADEMARK REGULATION AND COMMUNITY
DESIGN REGULATION 423
3.4.2 EUROPEAN PATENTS 428
4. APPLICABLE LAW IN THE EU AND UK 429
4.1 ROME REGULATION 429
4.2 COPYRIGHT: BERNE CONVENTION 431
4.3 CASELAW OF THE ENGLISH COURTS 433
5. CONCLUSION 434
13. CONCLUSION 436
1. JURISDICTION AND DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES*THE JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE
436
2. GLOBALIZATION AND IDENTITY 437
3. CONNECTING FACTORS AND TERRITORIALITY 437
4. WORLDWIDE REMEDIES OR LOCALIZED REMEDIES? 440
5. ENFORCEMENT: THE ROLE OF PRIVATE GATEKEEPERS 441
6. CHANGING THE TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE: CLOSED SYSTEMS AND THEIR
INTERFACES 442
7. RULE-LEVEL CHANGES 443
7.1 TARGETING AND DIRECTING 443
7.2 JURISDICTIONAL RESTRAINT: COMITY, EXTRATERRITORIALITY, AND
REASONABLENESS 446
8. SYSTEMIC CHANGES 446
8.1 COORDINATION, COORDINATION, COORDINATION 447
8.2 GEO-LOCATION AND GEO-BLOCKING 448
8.3 PRIVATE LAW SYSTEMS: DEPLETING SOVEREIGNTY AND STATES WITHIN STATES
450
9. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JURISDICTION, THE RULE OF LAW,
AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 451
INDEX 453 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Hörnle, Julia 1970- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)137549393 |
| author_facet | Hörnle, Julia 1970- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Hörnle, Julia 1970- |
| author_variant | j h jh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046898273 |
| classification_rvk | PZ 3250 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1250470603 (DE-599)KXP1730486509 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | First edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03461nam a22004218c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046898273</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210802 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200914s2021 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780198806929</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-880692-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0198806922</subfield><subfield code="9">0-19-880692-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1250470603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1730486509</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PZ 3250</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141166:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hörnle, Julia</subfield><subfield code="d">1970-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)137549393</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internet jurisdiction</subfield><subfield code="b">law and practice</subfield><subfield code="c">Julia Hörnle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">lviii, 485 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">From a technological standpoint, geography is largely irrelevant. Data flows through the internet without regard for political borders or territories. Services, communication, and interaction can occur online between persons who may be in different countries. Illegal activities, like hacking, cyberespionage, propagating terrorist propaganda, defamation, revenge porn, and illegal marketplaces may all be remotely targeted and accessed from various countries. As such, the internet has created an interesting and complex set of challenges for the concept of jurisdiction and conflicts of law. This title takes a comparative approach covering the EU, UK, US, Germany, and China.0Broken into four parts, this book delves into the notion of jurisdiction as it relates to the internet. Part I focuses on the different meanings of the concept of jurisdiction, from a legal and historical perspective, and distinguishing between the different branches of government. It will highlight the challenges created by the internet, including social media and cloud computing. Part II analyses criminal jurisdiction, in regards to both jurisdictions in cybercrime cases and jurisdictional issues relating to criminal investigations (access to the cloud) and enforcement. Part III examines jurisdiction and applicable law in civil and commercial matters, such as e-commerce B2B and B2C contracts, torts typically occurring online, and online defamation and privacy infringement. Finally, Part IV looks at regulatory jurisdiction, examining the power of the executive (whether an arm of government or independent regulator) to apply and enforce national law. It will look at aspects like the provision of online audio-visual media services and online gambling services, both of which are heavily regulated, but which can be easily provided remotely from different jurisdictions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsgeltung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124033-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internet</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4308416-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internet</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4308416-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsgeltung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124033-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032307982&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032307982</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV046898273 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T15:23:17Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:56:53Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780198806929 0198806922 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032307982 |
| oclc_num | 1250470603 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-739 DE-20 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-739 DE-20 |
| physical | lviii, 485 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Hörnle, Julia 1970- Verfasser (DE-588)137549393 aut Internet jurisdiction law and practice Julia Hörnle First edition Oxford Oxford University Press 2021 lviii, 485 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier From a technological standpoint, geography is largely irrelevant. Data flows through the internet without regard for political borders or territories. Services, communication, and interaction can occur online between persons who may be in different countries. Illegal activities, like hacking, cyberespionage, propagating terrorist propaganda, defamation, revenge porn, and illegal marketplaces may all be remotely targeted and accessed from various countries. As such, the internet has created an interesting and complex set of challenges for the concept of jurisdiction and conflicts of law. This title takes a comparative approach covering the EU, UK, US, Germany, and China.0Broken into four parts, this book delves into the notion of jurisdiction as it relates to the internet. Part I focuses on the different meanings of the concept of jurisdiction, from a legal and historical perspective, and distinguishing between the different branches of government. It will highlight the challenges created by the internet, including social media and cloud computing. Part II analyses criminal jurisdiction, in regards to both jurisdictions in cybercrime cases and jurisdictional issues relating to criminal investigations (access to the cloud) and enforcement. Part III examines jurisdiction and applicable law in civil and commercial matters, such as e-commerce B2B and B2C contracts, torts typically occurring online, and online defamation and privacy infringement. Finally, Part IV looks at regulatory jurisdiction, examining the power of the executive (whether an arm of government or independent regulator) to apply and enforce national law. It will look at aspects like the provision of online audio-visual media services and online gambling services, both of which are heavily regulated, but which can be easily provided remotely from different jurisdictions Rechtsgeltung (DE-588)4124033-9 gnd rswk-swf Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd rswk-swf Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 s Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 s Rechtsgeltung (DE-588)4124033-9 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s DE-604 SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032307982&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Hörnle, Julia 1970- Internet jurisdiction law and practice Rechtsgeltung (DE-588)4124033-9 gnd Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4124033-9 (DE-588)4048737-4 (DE-588)4308416-3 (DE-588)4115712-6 |
| title | Internet jurisdiction law and practice |
| title_auth | Internet jurisdiction law and practice |
| title_exact_search | Internet jurisdiction law and practice |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Internet jurisdiction law and practice |
| title_full | Internet jurisdiction law and practice Julia Hörnle |
| title_fullStr | Internet jurisdiction law and practice Julia Hörnle |
| title_full_unstemmed | Internet jurisdiction law and practice Julia Hörnle |
| title_short | Internet jurisdiction |
| title_sort | internet jurisdiction law and practice |
| title_sub | law and practice |
| topic | Rechtsgeltung (DE-588)4124033-9 gnd Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Rechtsgeltung Recht Internet Rechtsvergleich |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032307982&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hornlejulia internetjurisdictionlawandpractice |