Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia: Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method
This report portrays the results of experimental research on dynamic duopoly markets with demand inertia. Two methods of experimentation are studied: game-playing experiments where subjects interact spontaneously via computer terminals, and computer tournaments between strategies designed by subject...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin, Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
1992
|
Ausgabe: | 1st ed. 1992 |
Schriftenreihe: | Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems
391 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BTU01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
Zusammenfassung: | This report portrays the results of experimental research on dynamic duopoly markets with demand inertia. Two methods of experimentation are studied: game-playing experiments where subjects interact spontaneously via computer terminals, and computer tournaments between strategies designed by subjects. The principal aim of this study is the understanding of boundedly rational decision making in the dynamic duopoly situation. 1. 1 Motivation The experiments examine a multistage duopoly game where prices in each period are the only decision variables. Sales depend on current prices and also on past sales (demand inertia). Applying the game-theoretic concept of subgame perfect equilibrium, the game is solved by backward induction. The result is a uniquely determined system of decision rules. However, we can hardly expect that human beings behave according to the equilibrium strategy of this game. It is unlikely that subjects are able to compute the equilibrium. And even if a subject is able to compute it, he might not make use of this knowledge. Only if he expects the others to behave according to the equilibrium, it is optimal for him to play the equilibrium strategy. We have evidence from several earlier experimental studies on oligopoly markets that, even in less complex oligopoly situations where the equilibrium solutions are very easy to compute, human behavior often is different from what is prescribed by normative theory. ! Normative theory is based on the concept of ideal rationality. However, human capabilities impose cognitive limits on rationality |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (X, 150 p) |
ISBN: | 9783642481444 |
DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-642-48144-4 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV046871968 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200828s1992 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9783642481444 |9 978-3-642-48144-4 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-3-642-48144-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-2-SBE)978-3-642-48144-4 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)863959507 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046871968 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-634 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 330.1 |2 23 | |
084 | |a QC 133 |0 (DE-625)141251: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a QH 430 |0 (DE-625)141581: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a SI 853 |0 (DE-625)143200: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Keser, Claudia |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia |b Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method |c by Claudia Keser |
250 | |a 1st ed. 1992 | ||
264 | 1 | |a Berlin, Heidelberg |b Springer Berlin Heidelberg |c 1992 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (X, 150 p) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems |v 391 | |
520 | |a This report portrays the results of experimental research on dynamic duopoly markets with demand inertia. Two methods of experimentation are studied: game-playing experiments where subjects interact spontaneously via computer terminals, and computer tournaments between strategies designed by subjects. The principal aim of this study is the understanding of boundedly rational decision making in the dynamic duopoly situation. 1. 1 Motivation The experiments examine a multistage duopoly game where prices in each period are the only decision variables. Sales depend on current prices and also on past sales (demand inertia). Applying the game-theoretic concept of subgame perfect equilibrium, the game is solved by backward induction. The result is a uniquely determined system of decision rules. However, we can hardly expect that human beings behave according to the equilibrium strategy of this game. It is unlikely that subjects are able to compute the equilibrium. And even if a subject is able to compute it, he might not make use of this knowledge. Only if he expects the others to behave according to the equilibrium, it is optimal for him to play the equilibrium strategy. We have evidence from several earlier experimental studies on oligopoly markets that, even in less complex oligopoly situations where the equilibrium solutions are very easy to compute, human behavior often is different from what is prescribed by normative theory. ! Normative theory is based on the concept of ideal rationality. However, human capabilities impose cognitive limits on rationality | ||
650 | 4 | |a Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods | |
650 | 4 | |a Economic theory | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Computersimulation |0 (DE-588)4148259-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strategie |0 (DE-588)4057952-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Spieltheorie |0 (DE-588)4056243-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Dyopol |0 (DE-588)4150938-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Experimentelle Spieltheorie |0 (DE-588)4252658-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Dyopol |0 (DE-588)4150938-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Strategie |0 (DE-588)4057952-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Experimentelle Spieltheorie |0 (DE-588)4252658-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Dyopol |0 (DE-588)4150938-9 |D s |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a Computersimulation |0 (DE-588)4148259-1 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 2 | 0 | |a Dyopol |0 (DE-588)4150938-9 |D s |
689 | 2 | 1 | |a Spieltheorie |0 (DE-588)4056243-8 |D s |
689 | 2 | |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9783540560906 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9783642481451 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48144-4 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-2-SBE |a ZDB-2-BAE | ||
940 | 1 | |q ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032282100 | ||
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48144-4 |l BTU01 |p ZDB-2-SBE |q ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804181720395677696 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Keser, Claudia |
author_facet | Keser, Claudia |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Keser, Claudia |
author_variant | c k ck |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV046871968 |
classification_rvk | QC 133 QH 430 SI 853 |
collection | ZDB-2-SBE ZDB-2-BAE |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-2-SBE)978-3-642-48144-4 (OCoLC)863959507 (DE-599)BVBBV046871968 |
dewey-full | 330.1 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 330 - Economics |
dewey-raw | 330.1 |
dewey-search | 330.1 |
dewey-sort | 3330.1 |
dewey-tens | 330 - Economics |
discipline | Mathematik Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Mathematik Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/978-3-642-48144-4 |
edition | 1st ed. 1992 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04112nmm a2200649zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046871968</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200828s1992 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783642481444</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-642-48144-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/978-3-642-48144-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-2-SBE)978-3-642-48144-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)863959507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046871968</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330.1</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">QC 133</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141251:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">QH 430</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141581:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SI 853</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)143200:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keser, Claudia</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia</subfield><subfield code="b">Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method</subfield><subfield code="c">by Claudia Keser</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed. 1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin, Heidelberg</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (X, 150 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems</subfield><subfield code="v">391</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This report portrays the results of experimental research on dynamic duopoly markets with demand inertia. Two methods of experimentation are studied: game-playing experiments where subjects interact spontaneously via computer terminals, and computer tournaments between strategies designed by subjects. The principal aim of this study is the understanding of boundedly rational decision making in the dynamic duopoly situation. 1. 1 Motivation The experiments examine a multistage duopoly game where prices in each period are the only decision variables. Sales depend on current prices and also on past sales (demand inertia). Applying the game-theoretic concept of subgame perfect equilibrium, the game is solved by backward induction. The result is a uniquely determined system of decision rules. However, we can hardly expect that human beings behave according to the equilibrium strategy of this game. It is unlikely that subjects are able to compute the equilibrium. And even if a subject is able to compute it, he might not make use of this knowledge. Only if he expects the others to behave according to the equilibrium, it is optimal for him to play the equilibrium strategy. We have evidence from several earlier experimental studies on oligopoly markets that, even in less complex oligopoly situations where the equilibrium solutions are very easy to compute, human behavior often is different from what is prescribed by normative theory. ! Normative theory is based on the concept of ideal rationality. However, human capabilities impose cognitive limits on rationality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Computersimulation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4148259-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057952-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Spieltheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056243-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dyopol</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4150938-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Experimentelle Spieltheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4252658-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dyopol</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4150938-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057952-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Experimentelle Spieltheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4252658-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dyopol</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4150938-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Computersimulation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4148259-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dyopol</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4150938-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Spieltheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056243-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9783540560906</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9783642481451</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48144-4</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-SBE</subfield><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-BAE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032282100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48144-4</subfield><subfield code="l">BTU01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-2-SBE</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
id | DE-604.BV046871968 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T15:15:36Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:56:08Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9783642481444 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032282100 |
oclc_num | 863959507 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-634 |
owner_facet | DE-634 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (X, 150 p) |
psigel | ZDB-2-SBE ZDB-2-BAE ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv ZDB-2-SBE ZDB-2-SBE_Archiv |
publishDate | 1992 |
publishDateSearch | 1992 |
publishDateSort | 1992 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems |
spelling | Keser, Claudia Verfasser aut Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method by Claudia Keser 1st ed. 1992 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 1992 1 Online-Ressource (X, 150 p) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 391 This report portrays the results of experimental research on dynamic duopoly markets with demand inertia. Two methods of experimentation are studied: game-playing experiments where subjects interact spontaneously via computer terminals, and computer tournaments between strategies designed by subjects. The principal aim of this study is the understanding of boundedly rational decision making in the dynamic duopoly situation. 1. 1 Motivation The experiments examine a multistage duopoly game where prices in each period are the only decision variables. Sales depend on current prices and also on past sales (demand inertia). Applying the game-theoretic concept of subgame perfect equilibrium, the game is solved by backward induction. The result is a uniquely determined system of decision rules. However, we can hardly expect that human beings behave according to the equilibrium strategy of this game. It is unlikely that subjects are able to compute the equilibrium. And even if a subject is able to compute it, he might not make use of this knowledge. Only if he expects the others to behave according to the equilibrium, it is optimal for him to play the equilibrium strategy. We have evidence from several earlier experimental studies on oligopoly markets that, even in less complex oligopoly situations where the equilibrium solutions are very easy to compute, human behavior often is different from what is prescribed by normative theory. ! Normative theory is based on the concept of ideal rationality. However, human capabilities impose cognitive limits on rationality Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economic theory Computersimulation (DE-588)4148259-1 gnd rswk-swf Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd rswk-swf Spieltheorie (DE-588)4056243-8 gnd rswk-swf Dyopol (DE-588)4150938-9 gnd rswk-swf Experimentelle Spieltheorie (DE-588)4252658-9 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Dyopol (DE-588)4150938-9 s Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 s Experimentelle Spieltheorie (DE-588)4252658-9 s DE-604 Computersimulation (DE-588)4148259-1 s Spieltheorie (DE-588)4056243-8 s Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9783540560906 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9783642481451 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48144-4 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Keser, Claudia Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economic theory Computersimulation (DE-588)4148259-1 gnd Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd Spieltheorie (DE-588)4056243-8 gnd Dyopol (DE-588)4150938-9 gnd Experimentelle Spieltheorie (DE-588)4252658-9 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4148259-1 (DE-588)4057952-9 (DE-588)4056243-8 (DE-588)4150938-9 (DE-588)4252658-9 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
title | Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method |
title_auth | Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method |
title_exact_search | Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method |
title_exact_search_txtP | Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method |
title_full | Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method by Claudia Keser |
title_fullStr | Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method by Claudia Keser |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method by Claudia Keser |
title_short | Experimental Duopoly Markets with Demand Inertia |
title_sort | experimental duopoly markets with demand inertia game playing experiments and the strategy method |
title_sub | Game-Playing Experiments and the Strategy Method |
topic | Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economic theory Computersimulation (DE-588)4148259-1 gnd Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd Spieltheorie (DE-588)4056243-8 gnd Dyopol (DE-588)4150938-9 gnd Experimentelle Spieltheorie (DE-588)4252658-9 gnd |
topic_facet | Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economic theory Computersimulation Strategie Spieltheorie Dyopol Experimentelle Spieltheorie Hochschulschrift |
url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48144-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keserclaudia experimentalduopolymarketswithdemandinertiagameplayingexperimentsandthestrategymethod |