If Adam had not sinned: the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus
Since the twelfth century, theologians have found a counterfactual question irresistible: "If Adam had not sinned, would the Son have become incarnate?" In the latter half of the twentieth century, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Hans Küng, Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, Wolfhart...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C.
The Catholic University of America Press
[2020]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Since the twelfth century, theologians have found a counterfactual question irresistible: "If Adam had not sinned, would the Son have become incarnate?" In the latter half of the twentieth century, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Hans Küng, Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, Wolfhart Pannenburg, Jürgen Moltmann, and Robert Jenson all considered this question on the reason, or motive, for the incarnation. Nearly every case refers to the classic disagreement between those who follow Thomas Aquinas and those who follow John Duns Scotus. Though it is common to claim Thomas or Scotus as one's authority, the theological debates among which Thomas and Scotus developed their own positions remain largely neglected. This study fills that gap. If Adam Had Not Sinned is a study of the medieval debates over the motive for the incarnation from Anselm of Canterbury to John Duns Scotus. While the volume is primarily focused on thirteenth-century debates at the University of Paris, it also supplies necessary historical background to those debates. As a result, the larger context within which Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus developed their influential responses is detailed. This larger context permits an analysis that leads to the surprising claim, against widespread assumptions, that the responses given by Thomas and Scotus are substantially reconcilable |
Beschreibung: | XVII, 257 Seiten |
ISBN: | 9780813232850 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV046757982 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20241206 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 200610s2020 xx b||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780813232850 |c hbk. |9 978-0-8132-3285-0 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1192320862 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046757982 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-20 |a DE-824 | ||
084 | |a BN 2030 |0 (DE-625)13070: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a BN 5320 |0 (DE-625)13793: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a BN 5525 |0 (DE-625)13799: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hunter, Justus H. |d 1982- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1049156307 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a If Adam had not sinned |b the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus |c Justus H. Hunter |
264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C. |b The Catholic University of America Press |c [2020] | |
300 | |a XVII, 257 Seiten | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
505 | 8 | |a The reason for the Incarnation - After Anselm -- Robert Grosseteste -- The Dominicans at Paris -- The Franciscans at Paris -- "Ratio incarnationis" | |
520 | 3 | |a Since the twelfth century, theologians have found a counterfactual question irresistible: "If Adam had not sinned, would the Son have become incarnate?" In the latter half of the twentieth century, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Hans Küng, Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, Wolfhart Pannenburg, Jürgen Moltmann, and Robert Jenson all considered this question on the reason, or motive, for the incarnation. Nearly every case refers to the classic disagreement between those who follow Thomas Aquinas and those who follow John Duns Scotus. Though it is common to claim Thomas or Scotus as one's authority, the theological debates among which Thomas and Scotus developed their own positions remain largely neglected. This study fills that gap. If Adam Had Not Sinned is a study of the medieval debates over the motive for the incarnation from Anselm of Canterbury to John Duns Scotus. While the volume is primarily focused on thirteenth-century debates at the University of Paris, it also supplies necessary historical background to those debates. As a result, the larger context within which Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus developed their influential responses is detailed. This larger context permits an analysis that leads to the surprising claim, against widespread assumptions, that the responses given by Thomas and Scotus are substantially reconcilable | |
648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1050-1350 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Inkarnation Jesu |0 (DE-588)1023789752 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Scholastik |0 (DE-588)4053169-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
653 | 0 | |a Incarnation / History of doctrines / Middle Ages, 600-1500 | |
653 | 4 | |a 600-1500 | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Inkarnation Jesu |0 (DE-588)1023789752 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Scholastik |0 (DE-588)4053169-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geschichte 1050-1350 |A z |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20201006 | |
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 200.9 |e 22/bsb |f 0902 |g 4 |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032167589 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1817696832802783232 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Hunter, Justus H. 1982- |
author_GND | (DE-588)1049156307 |
author_facet | Hunter, Justus H. 1982- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Hunter, Justus H. 1982- |
author_variant | j h h jh jhh |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV046757982 |
classification_rvk | BN 2030 BN 5320 BN 5525 |
contents | The reason for the Incarnation - After Anselm -- Robert Grosseteste -- The Dominicans at Paris -- The Franciscans at Paris -- "Ratio incarnationis" |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1192320862 (DE-599)BVBBV046757982 |
discipline | Theologie / Religionswissenschaften |
era | Geschichte 1050-1350 gnd |
era_facet | Geschichte 1050-1350 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046757982</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241206</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200610s2020 xx b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780813232850</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8132-3285-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1192320862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046757982</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BN 2030</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)13070:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BN 5320</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)13793:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BN 5525</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)13799:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hunter, Justus H.</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1049156307</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">If Adam had not sinned</subfield><subfield code="b">the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus</subfield><subfield code="c">Justus H. Hunter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C.</subfield><subfield code="b">The Catholic University of America Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2020]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVII, 257 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The reason for the Incarnation - After Anselm -- Robert Grosseteste -- The Dominicans at Paris -- The Franciscans at Paris -- "Ratio incarnationis"</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Since the twelfth century, theologians have found a counterfactual question irresistible: "If Adam had not sinned, would the Son have become incarnate?" In the latter half of the twentieth century, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Hans Küng, Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, Wolfhart Pannenburg, Jürgen Moltmann, and Robert Jenson all considered this question on the reason, or motive, for the incarnation. Nearly every case refers to the classic disagreement between those who follow Thomas Aquinas and those who follow John Duns Scotus. Though it is common to claim Thomas or Scotus as one's authority, the theological debates among which Thomas and Scotus developed their own positions remain largely neglected. This study fills that gap. If Adam Had Not Sinned is a study of the medieval debates over the motive for the incarnation from Anselm of Canterbury to John Duns Scotus. While the volume is primarily focused on thirteenth-century debates at the University of Paris, it also supplies necessary historical background to those debates. As a result, the larger context within which Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus developed their influential responses is detailed. This larger context permits an analysis that leads to the surprising claim, against widespread assumptions, that the responses given by Thomas and Scotus are substantially reconcilable</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1050-1350</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Inkarnation Jesu</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1023789752</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Scholastik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4053169-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Incarnation / History of doctrines / Middle Ages, 600-1500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600-1500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Inkarnation Jesu</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1023789752</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Scholastik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4053169-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1050-1350</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20201006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">200.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0902</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032167589</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV046757982 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T14:43:43Z |
indexdate | 2024-12-06T13:13:04Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780813232850 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032167589 |
oclc_num | 1192320862 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-20 DE-824 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-20 DE-824 |
physical | XVII, 257 Seiten |
psigel | BSB_NED_20201006 |
publishDate | 2020 |
publishDateSearch | 2020 |
publishDateSort | 2020 |
publisher | The Catholic University of America Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Hunter, Justus H. 1982- Verfasser (DE-588)1049156307 aut If Adam had not sinned the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus Justus H. Hunter Washington, D.C. The Catholic University of America Press [2020] XVII, 257 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The reason for the Incarnation - After Anselm -- Robert Grosseteste -- The Dominicans at Paris -- The Franciscans at Paris -- "Ratio incarnationis" Since the twelfth century, theologians have found a counterfactual question irresistible: "If Adam had not sinned, would the Son have become incarnate?" In the latter half of the twentieth century, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Hans Küng, Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, Wolfhart Pannenburg, Jürgen Moltmann, and Robert Jenson all considered this question on the reason, or motive, for the incarnation. Nearly every case refers to the classic disagreement between those who follow Thomas Aquinas and those who follow John Duns Scotus. Though it is common to claim Thomas or Scotus as one's authority, the theological debates among which Thomas and Scotus developed their own positions remain largely neglected. This study fills that gap. If Adam Had Not Sinned is a study of the medieval debates over the motive for the incarnation from Anselm of Canterbury to John Duns Scotus. While the volume is primarily focused on thirteenth-century debates at the University of Paris, it also supplies necessary historical background to those debates. As a result, the larger context within which Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus developed their influential responses is detailed. This larger context permits an analysis that leads to the surprising claim, against widespread assumptions, that the responses given by Thomas and Scotus are substantially reconcilable Geschichte 1050-1350 gnd rswk-swf Inkarnation Jesu (DE-588)1023789752 gnd rswk-swf Scholastik (DE-588)4053169-7 gnd rswk-swf Incarnation / History of doctrines / Middle Ages, 600-1500 600-1500 Inkarnation Jesu (DE-588)1023789752 s Scholastik (DE-588)4053169-7 s Geschichte 1050-1350 z DE-604 |
spellingShingle | Hunter, Justus H. 1982- If Adam had not sinned the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus The reason for the Incarnation - After Anselm -- Robert Grosseteste -- The Dominicans at Paris -- The Franciscans at Paris -- "Ratio incarnationis" Inkarnation Jesu (DE-588)1023789752 gnd Scholastik (DE-588)4053169-7 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)1023789752 (DE-588)4053169-7 |
title | If Adam had not sinned the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus |
title_auth | If Adam had not sinned the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus |
title_exact_search | If Adam had not sinned the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus |
title_exact_search_txtP | If Adam had not sinned the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus |
title_full | If Adam had not sinned the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus Justus H. Hunter |
title_fullStr | If Adam had not sinned the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus Justus H. Hunter |
title_full_unstemmed | If Adam had not sinned the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus Justus H. Hunter |
title_short | If Adam had not sinned |
title_sort | if adam had not sinned the reason for the incarnation from anselm to scotus |
title_sub | the reason for the incarnation from Anselm to Scotus |
topic | Inkarnation Jesu (DE-588)1023789752 gnd Scholastik (DE-588)4053169-7 gnd |
topic_facet | Inkarnation Jesu Scholastik |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hunterjustush ifadamhadnotsinnedthereasonfortheincarnationfromanselmtoscotus |