The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor: judicial lawmaking and its limits
The EU Treaties bind the Court of Justice of the European Union as an institution of the Union. But what does that mean for judicial lawmaking within the EU legal order? And how might any limits set out in the EU Treaties be effectively applied to the Court of Justice as lawmaker? This book interrog...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge studies in European law and policy
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | The EU Treaties bind the Court of Justice of the European Union as an institution of the Union. But what does that mean for judicial lawmaking within the EU legal order? And how might any limits set out in the EU Treaties be effectively applied to the Court of Justice as lawmaker? This book interrogates these fundamental and underexplored questions at a critical juncture in European integration. It argues that the EU Treaties should be considered to function as the principal touchstones for assessing the internal constitutionality, and hence legitimacy, of all Union institutional activity - including the work of the Court. It then examines how far the Court of Justice complies with the EU Treaty framework in the exercise of its interpretative functions. The results of that analysis are striking and offer scholars powerful new insights into the nature and limits of the Court's role within the EU legal order |
Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 25 Jul 2018) |
Beschreibung: | XXIX, 296 Seiten |
ISBN: | 9781107124035 9781107561137 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV046693553 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20200803 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 200425s2018 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781107124035 |9 978-1-107-12403-5 | ||
020 | |a 9781107561137 |9 978-1-107-56113-7 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1045424445 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046693553 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-384 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 347.24/01 | |
084 | |a PS 2960 |0 (DE-625)139745: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Horsley, Thomas |d 1984- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1165815389 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor |b judicial lawmaking and its limits |c Thomas Horsley, University of Liverpool |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2018 | |
300 | |a XXIX, 296 Seiten | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in European law and policy | |
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 25 Jul 2018) | ||
520 | |a The EU Treaties bind the Court of Justice of the European Union as an institution of the Union. But what does that mean for judicial lawmaking within the EU legal order? And how might any limits set out in the EU Treaties be effectively applied to the Court of Justice as lawmaker? This book interrogates these fundamental and underexplored questions at a critical juncture in European integration. It argues that the EU Treaties should be considered to function as the principal touchstones for assessing the internal constitutionality, and hence legitimacy, of all Union institutional activity - including the work of the Court. It then examines how far the Court of Justice complies with the EU Treaty framework in the exercise of its interpretative functions. The results of that analysis are striking and offer scholars powerful new insights into the nature and limits of the Court's role within the EU legal order | ||
610 | 2 | 4 | |a Court of Justice of the European Union |
610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsfortbildung |0 (DE-588)4048792-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |D b |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtsfortbildung |0 (DE-588)4048792-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-316-40379-2 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032104261&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032104261 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1820143013636079616 |
---|---|
adam_text |
Contents Series Editors' Preface Preface Acknowledgements Table of Cases page xvii xix xxi xxii Introduction 1 1 The EU Treaty Framework as Constitutional Touchstone Introduction 1 The Treaty Framework and Internal Constitutionality 1.1 The Foundations of the Treaty Framework as Constitutional Touchstone 1.2 The EU Treaty Framework’s Scope of Application as Constitutional Touchstone 1.3 The Normative Power of the EU Treaty Framework as Constitutional Touchstone 2 The EU Treaties and the Three Issues for EU Constitutionalism 2.1 Constitutional Issue No. 1: What Is the Formal Status of Union Law under the Treaties and under What Conditions Does It Apply within Member States? 2.1.1 The Formal Status of Union Law 2.1.2 The Domestic Application of EU Law 2.2 Constitutional Issue No. 2: The Locus of EU Political Authority within the EU Legal Order 2.2.1 Constituent Authority 2.2.2 Political Authority for Union Policymaking xi 21 21 23 24 26 30 32 34 34 37 41 42 43
ХІІ CONTENTS 2.3 Constitutional Issue No. 3: The Objectives, Values and Limits of EU Integration 2.3.1 The Objectives of European Integration 2.3.2 The Values of European Integration 2.3.3 The Limits on European Integration Concluding Remarks 2 The EU Treaty Framework and the Constitutional Context of European Integration Introduction 1 The Space between: The EU Treaties and the Constitutional Context of EU Integration 2 Constitutional Supplementation 2.1 2.2 2.3 3 5 57 60 60 61 63 64 67 68 Constitutional Contestation 71 3.1 3.2 71 3.3 4 Inter-Institutional Agreements Comitology The Court’s Jurisprudence on ‘General Principles’ 48 49 51 53 The Luxembourg Compromise (1966) The Establishment of the European Council (1974) The Decision on the New Settlement for the UK within the EU (2016) 73 76 Constitutional Supplementation, Constitutional Contestation and the Dynamics of EU Treaty Reform 78 4.1 4.2 79 81 Normalisation through Treaty Amendment The Comi: of Justice as Intermediary Eurozone Crisis Management: A Study in Constitutional Contestation in the Political Sphere 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 The Eurozone Crisis: Background and Political Responses The Eurozone Crisis and Constitutional Contestation 5.2.1 Challenges to the Locus of EU Political Authority 5.2.2 Challenges to Objectives, Values and Limits of EU Integration Towards Normalisation with the EU Treaty Framework The Court’s Role as Intermediary in Eurozone Crisis Management Concluding Remarks 83 85 87 87 90 91 91 97
COKTENTS 3 4 The Court of Justice, the Treaty Framework and Constitutional Issue No. 1 Introduction 1 The EU Treaties and the Normative Framework of International Law 1.1 International Law as a Normative Framework Structuring Inter-State Co-operation 1.1.1 What Limits Does International Law Impose on States’ Contractual Freedom? 1.1.2 To What Extent Does International Law by Its Own Authority Provide for the Direct Penetration of Domestic Legal Systems? 1.1.3 What Took Are Available to States in Domestic Law to Manage the Internal Application of International Treaty Norms? 1.1.4 What Took Are Available to States in International Law to Manage the Internal Application of International Treaty Norms? 1.2 The EU Treaties as Instruments of International Law 1.2.1 Adoption, Amendment and Ratification 1.2.2 The Domestic Effect of EU Norms under the Treaty Framework 1.2.3 The EU Treaty Framework: Innovative Features 2 Colliding Worlds: The Court of Justice contra the EU Treaty Framework 2.1 The Court of Justice and Constitutional Issue No. 1 2.2 The Court’s Position on Constitutional Issue No. 1: Origins and Evolution 3 The Court of Justice, Constitutional Issue No. 1 and the ‘Constitutionalisation’ of the EU Legal Order 3.1 The Court of Justice and the ‘Constitutionalisation’ of the EU Legal Order 3.2 Support from the Sidelines: EU Legal Scholarship Concluding Remarks The Court of Justice, the Treaty Framework and Constitutional Issue No. 2 Introduction 1 Constituent Authority: The Court of Justice versus the EU Treaty Framework 1.1 The EU Treaty Framework and Constituent
Authority xiii 98 98 100 102 102 104 105 107 109 110 111 113 115 116 118 122 123 127 130 133 133 135 136
xiv CONTENTS 1.2 Judicial Challenges to Constituent Authority 1.2.1 Judicial Challenges to Member States’ 1.2.2 2 Competence to Revise the Treaties Judicial Challenges to Member States' Acts of Constitutional Supplementation 1.3 The Court of Justice: From Agent to Trustee Union Policymaking: The Court of Justice versus the EU Treaty Framework 2.1 EU Policymaking and the EU Treaties: Political Institutions, Attributed Powers and Institutional Balance 2.1.1 Political Institutions 2.1.2 2.2 Attributed Powers Institutional Balance 2.1.3 Constitutional Contestation: The Court as Direct Policymaker 2.2.1 The Origins of the Court’s Direct 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 Policymaking Platform The Evolution of the Court’s Role as Direct Policymaker The Impact of the Court's Direct Policymaking Role on the Institutional Dynamics of EU Policymaking The Resilience of the Court’s Platform for Direct Policymaking Concluding Remarks 5 The Court of Justice, the Treaty Framework and Constitutional Issue No. 3 Introduction 1 The Values of EU Policymaking: The Court of Justice versus the EU Treaty Framework 1.1 Air Transport 1.1.1 Judicial Challenges to Regulation 26112004 1.1.2 1.2 1.3 EU on Air Passenger Compensation Rights Judicial Challenges to EU Regulations on Aircraft Licensing Union Citizenship 1.2.1 Entitlements to Social Security Benefits 1.2.2 Residence Rights The Court of Justice and the EU Legislature 1.3.1 The Emergence of European Representative 1.3.2 Democracy as a Normative Value under the EU Treaty Framework The Court ofJustice and Representative Democracy as a Normative Value under the
Treaty Framework 137 138 142 149 151 152 152 153 154 156 158 161 163 166 167 169 169 172 173 173 176 179 180 182 186 188 190
CONTENTS 2 The Limits on EU Policymaking: The Court of Justice versus the EU Treaty Framework 2.1 Limits on Union Policymaking under the Treaty Framework 2.2 The Court as Direct Policymaker: Functional Expectations 2.3 The Court and Treaty Exclusions on EU Legislative Policymaking 2.3.1 The Reimbursement of the Costs of Medical 2.3.2 2.4 Treatments Received Abroad The Right to Strike The Cotut of Justice as ‘Detached’ Policymaker Concluding Remarks 6 XV 193 195 196 200 201 204 207 211 The Feedback Loop: The Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors 213 Introduction 213 1 Member State Responses to Judicial Constitutional Contestation: Constitutional Issue No. 1 215 1.1 The Collective Response: Member States as Treaty Signatories 1.1.1 Negative References to Direct Effect in 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 1.2 the Treaty Framework Declaration No. 17 on the Primacy of Union Low Protocol No. 8 on EU Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights Normalisation as Part of the EU Accession Acquis The National Response: Member States and National Courts 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 Domestic Responses: Overview Domestic Responses: The Role of National Courts Explaining Domestic Constitutional Adjustment 2 Member State Responses to Judicial Constitutional Contestation: Constitutional Issues No. 2 and No. 3 2.1 The Collective Response: Member States as Treaty Signatories 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.2 Member State Interventions to Recast Judicial Policy Choices Member State Interventions to Manage the Scope for Future Judicial Policymaking The National Response: Member States and National Courts 216 217 218 220 221 222
223 225 227 230 230 231 233 236
xvi CONTENTS 2.2.1 2.2.2 3 The German Federal Constitutional Court in Honeywell ‘Push Back’ as a Broader Constitutional Phenomenon Reponses in the EU Scholarship 3.1 3.2 3.3 EU Scholars and the Formal Status of EU Law: Defending the Judicial Vision Legal Scholarship on the Court: A Fivefold Typology Legal Scholarship on the Court: Summary Concluding Remarks 7 Conclusion: Three Contemporary Problems, Four Reform Proposals Introduction 1 Three Contemporary Problems for EU Judicial Lawmaking 1.1 1.2 1.3 2 3 Problem No. 1: Judicial Challenges to Constituent Authority Problem No. 2: Judicial Challenges to Treaty Limits on EU Policymaking Problem No. 3: Judicial Challenges to EU Legislative Frameworks The Three Contemporaiy Problems: Challenges to the Legitimacy of European Integration The Court of Justice and the EU Treaty Framework as Constitutional Touchstone: Four Proposals for Reform 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Proposal No. 1: Closer Judicial Engagement with the Treaty Framework 3.1.1 Article 6 7 EEC on Capital Movements 3.1.2 Standing Rights in Annulment Proceedings 3.1.3 EU Citizenship Proposal No. 2: A Revised Approach to Scrutiny of the Court Proposal No. 3: Improving the Quality of the EU Treaty Framework Proposal No. 4: Establishing a New EU Framework for Compliance Monitoring Concluding Remarks Index 236 239 242 243 245 255 256 260 260 262 262 263 265 266 269 270 272 273 275 277 279 280 283 288 |
adam_txt |
Contents Series Editors' Preface Preface Acknowledgements Table of Cases page xvii xix xxi xxii Introduction 1 1 The EU Treaty Framework as Constitutional Touchstone Introduction 1 The Treaty Framework and Internal Constitutionality 1.1 The Foundations of the Treaty Framework as Constitutional Touchstone 1.2 The EU Treaty Framework’s Scope of Application as Constitutional Touchstone 1.3 The Normative Power of the EU Treaty Framework as Constitutional Touchstone 2 The EU Treaties and the Three Issues for EU Constitutionalism 2.1 Constitutional Issue No. 1: What Is the Formal Status of Union Law under the Treaties and under What Conditions Does It Apply within Member States? 2.1.1 The Formal Status of Union Law 2.1.2 The Domestic Application of EU Law 2.2 Constitutional Issue No. 2: The Locus of EU Political Authority within the EU Legal Order 2.2.1 Constituent Authority 2.2.2 Political Authority for Union Policymaking xi 21 21 23 24 26 30 32 34 34 37 41 42 43
ХІІ CONTENTS 2.3 Constitutional Issue No. 3: The Objectives, Values and Limits of EU Integration 2.3.1 The Objectives of European Integration 2.3.2 The Values of European Integration 2.3.3 The Limits on European Integration Concluding Remarks 2 The EU Treaty Framework and the Constitutional Context of European Integration Introduction 1 The Space between: The EU Treaties and the Constitutional Context of EU Integration 2 Constitutional Supplementation 2.1 2.2 2.3 3 5 57 60 60 61 63 64 67 68 Constitutional Contestation 71 3.1 3.2 71 3.3 4 Inter-Institutional Agreements Comitology The Court’s Jurisprudence on ‘General Principles’ 48 49 51 53 The Luxembourg Compromise (1966) The Establishment of the European Council (1974) The Decision on the New Settlement for the UK within the EU (2016) 73 76 Constitutional Supplementation, Constitutional Contestation and the Dynamics of EU Treaty Reform 78 4.1 4.2 79 81 Normalisation through Treaty Amendment The Comi: of Justice as Intermediary Eurozone Crisis Management: A Study in Constitutional Contestation in the Political Sphere 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 The Eurozone Crisis: Background and Political Responses The Eurozone Crisis and Constitutional Contestation 5.2.1 Challenges to the Locus of EU Political Authority 5.2.2 Challenges to Objectives, Values and Limits of EU Integration Towards Normalisation with the EU Treaty Framework The Court’s Role as Intermediary in Eurozone Crisis Management Concluding Remarks 83 85 87 87 90 91 91 97
COKTENTS 3 4 The Court of Justice, the Treaty Framework and Constitutional Issue No. 1 Introduction 1 The EU Treaties and the Normative Framework of International Law 1.1 International Law as a Normative Framework Structuring Inter-State Co-operation 1.1.1 What Limits Does International Law Impose on States’ Contractual Freedom? 1.1.2 To What Extent Does International Law by Its Own Authority Provide for the Direct Penetration of Domestic Legal Systems? 1.1.3 What Took Are Available to States in Domestic Law to Manage the Internal Application of International Treaty Norms? 1.1.4 What Took Are Available to States in International Law to Manage the Internal Application of International Treaty Norms? 1.2 The EU Treaties as Instruments of International Law 1.2.1 Adoption, Amendment and Ratification 1.2.2 The Domestic Effect of EU Norms under the Treaty Framework 1.2.3 The EU Treaty Framework: Innovative Features 2 Colliding Worlds: The Court of Justice contra the EU Treaty Framework 2.1 The Court of Justice and Constitutional Issue No. 1 2.2 The Court’s Position on Constitutional Issue No. 1: Origins and Evolution 3 The Court of Justice, Constitutional Issue No. 1 and the ‘Constitutionalisation’ of the EU Legal Order 3.1 The Court of Justice and the ‘Constitutionalisation’ of the EU Legal Order 3.2 Support from the Sidelines: EU Legal Scholarship Concluding Remarks The Court of Justice, the Treaty Framework and Constitutional Issue No. 2 Introduction 1 Constituent Authority: The Court of Justice versus the EU Treaty Framework 1.1 The EU Treaty Framework and Constituent
Authority xiii 98 98 100 102 102 104 105 107 109 110 111 113 115 116 118 122 123 127 130 133 133 135 136
xiv CONTENTS 1.2 Judicial Challenges to Constituent Authority 1.2.1 Judicial Challenges to Member States’ 1.2.2 2 Competence to Revise the Treaties Judicial Challenges to Member States' Acts of Constitutional Supplementation 1.3 The Court of Justice: From Agent to Trustee Union Policymaking: The Court of Justice versus the EU Treaty Framework 2.1 EU Policymaking and the EU Treaties: Political Institutions, Attributed Powers and Institutional Balance 2.1.1 Political Institutions 2.1.2 2.2 Attributed Powers Institutional Balance 2.1.3 Constitutional Contestation: The Court as Direct Policymaker 2.2.1 The Origins of the Court’s Direct 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 Policymaking Platform The Evolution of the Court’s Role as Direct Policymaker The Impact of the Court's Direct Policymaking Role on the Institutional Dynamics of EU Policymaking The Resilience of the Court’s Platform for Direct Policymaking Concluding Remarks 5 The Court of Justice, the Treaty Framework and Constitutional Issue No. 3 Introduction 1 The Values of EU Policymaking: The Court of Justice versus the EU Treaty Framework 1.1 Air Transport 1.1.1 Judicial Challenges to Regulation 26112004 1.1.2 1.2 1.3 EU on Air Passenger Compensation Rights Judicial Challenges to EU Regulations on Aircraft Licensing Union Citizenship 1.2.1 Entitlements to Social Security Benefits 1.2.2 Residence Rights The Court of Justice and the EU Legislature 1.3.1 The Emergence of European Representative 1.3.2 Democracy as a Normative Value under the EU Treaty Framework The Court ofJustice and Representative Democracy as a Normative Value under the
Treaty Framework 137 138 142 149 151 152 152 153 154 156 158 161 163 166 167 169 169 172 173 173 176 179 180 182 186 188 190
CONTENTS 2 The Limits on EU Policymaking: The Court of Justice versus the EU Treaty Framework 2.1 Limits on Union Policymaking under the Treaty Framework 2.2 The Court as Direct Policymaker: Functional Expectations 2.3 The Court and Treaty Exclusions on EU Legislative Policymaking 2.3.1 The Reimbursement of the Costs of Medical 2.3.2 2.4 Treatments Received Abroad The Right to Strike The Cotut of Justice as ‘Detached’ Policymaker Concluding Remarks 6 XV 193 195 196 200 201 204 207 211 The Feedback Loop: The Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors 213 Introduction 213 1 Member State Responses to Judicial Constitutional Contestation: Constitutional Issue No. 1 215 1.1 The Collective Response: Member States as Treaty Signatories 1.1.1 Negative References to Direct Effect in 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 1.2 the Treaty Framework Declaration No. 17 on the Primacy of Union Low Protocol No. 8 on EU Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights Normalisation as Part of the EU Accession Acquis The National Response: Member States and National Courts 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 Domestic Responses: Overview Domestic Responses: The Role of National Courts Explaining Domestic Constitutional Adjustment 2 Member State Responses to Judicial Constitutional Contestation: Constitutional Issues No. 2 and No. 3 2.1 The Collective Response: Member States as Treaty Signatories 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.2 Member State Interventions to Recast Judicial Policy Choices Member State Interventions to Manage the Scope for Future Judicial Policymaking The National Response: Member States and National Courts 216 217 218 220 221 222
223 225 227 230 230 231 233 236
xvi CONTENTS 2.2.1 2.2.2 3 The German Federal Constitutional Court in Honeywell ‘Push Back’ as a Broader Constitutional Phenomenon Reponses in the EU Scholarship 3.1 3.2 3.3 EU Scholars and the Formal Status of EU Law: Defending the Judicial Vision Legal Scholarship on the Court: A Fivefold Typology Legal Scholarship on the Court: Summary Concluding Remarks 7 Conclusion: Three Contemporary Problems, Four Reform Proposals Introduction 1 Three Contemporary Problems for EU Judicial Lawmaking 1.1 1.2 1.3 2 3 Problem No. 1: Judicial Challenges to Constituent Authority Problem No. 2: Judicial Challenges to Treaty Limits on EU Policymaking Problem No. 3: Judicial Challenges to EU Legislative Frameworks The Three Contemporaiy Problems: Challenges to the Legitimacy of European Integration The Court of Justice and the EU Treaty Framework as Constitutional Touchstone: Four Proposals for Reform 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Proposal No. 1: Closer Judicial Engagement with the Treaty Framework 3.1.1 Article 6 7 EEC on Capital Movements 3.1.2 Standing Rights in Annulment Proceedings 3.1.3 EU Citizenship Proposal No. 2: A Revised Approach to Scrutiny of the Court Proposal No. 3: Improving the Quality of the EU Treaty Framework Proposal No. 4: Establishing a New EU Framework for Compliance Monitoring Concluding Remarks Index 236 239 242 243 245 255 256 260 260 262 262 263 265 266 269 270 272 273 275 277 279 280 283 288 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Horsley, Thomas 1984- |
author_GND | (DE-588)1165815389 |
author_facet | Horsley, Thomas 1984- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Horsley, Thomas 1984- |
author_variant | t h th |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV046693553 |
classification_rvk | PS 2960 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1045424445 (DE-599)BVBBV046693553 |
dewey-full | 347.24/01 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.24/01 |
dewey-search | 347.24/01 |
dewey-sort | 3347.24 11 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046693553</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200803</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200425s2018 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107124035</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-12403-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107561137</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-56113-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1045424445</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046693553</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.24/01</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 2960</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139745:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Horsley, Thomas</subfield><subfield code="d">1984-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1165815389</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor</subfield><subfield code="b">judicial lawmaking and its limits</subfield><subfield code="c">Thomas Horsley, University of Liverpool</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXIX, 296 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in European law and policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 25 Jul 2018)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The EU Treaties bind the Court of Justice of the European Union as an institution of the Union. But what does that mean for judicial lawmaking within the EU legal order? And how might any limits set out in the EU Treaties be effectively applied to the Court of Justice as lawmaker? This book interrogates these fundamental and underexplored questions at a critical juncture in European integration. It argues that the EU Treaties should be considered to function as the principal touchstones for assessing the internal constitutionality, and hence legitimacy, of all Union institutional activity - including the work of the Court. It then examines how far the Court of Justice complies with the EU Treaty framework in the exercise of its interpretative functions. The results of that analysis are striking and offer scholars powerful new insights into the nature and limits of the Court's role within the EU legal order</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court of Justice of the European Union</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsfortbildung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048792-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsfortbildung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048792-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-316-40379-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032104261&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032104261</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV046693553 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T14:25:55Z |
indexdate | 2025-01-02T13:14:03Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781107124035 9781107561137 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032104261 |
oclc_num | 1045424445 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-384 |
owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-384 |
physical | XXIX, 296 Seiten |
publishDate | 2018 |
publishDateSearch | 2018 |
publishDateSort | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Cambridge studies in European law and policy |
spelling | Horsley, Thomas 1984- Verfasser (DE-588)1165815389 aut The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor judicial lawmaking and its limits Thomas Horsley, University of Liverpool Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2018 XXIX, 296 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Cambridge studies in European law and policy Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 25 Jul 2018) The EU Treaties bind the Court of Justice of the European Union as an institution of the Union. But what does that mean for judicial lawmaking within the EU legal order? And how might any limits set out in the EU Treaties be effectively applied to the Court of Justice as lawmaker? This book interrogates these fundamental and underexplored questions at a critical juncture in European integration. It argues that the EU Treaties should be considered to function as the principal touchstones for assessing the internal constitutionality, and hence legitimacy, of all Union institutional activity - including the work of the Court. It then examines how far the Court of Justice complies with the EU Treaty framework in the exercise of its interpretative functions. The results of that analysis are striking and offer scholars powerful new insights into the nature and limits of the Court's role within the EU legal order Court of Justice of the European Union Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsfortbildung (DE-588)4048792-1 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 b Rechtsfortbildung (DE-588)4048792-1 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-316-40379-2 Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032104261&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Horsley, Thomas 1984- The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor judicial lawmaking and its limits Court of Justice of the European Union Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Rechtsfortbildung (DE-588)4048792-1 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)5103273-9 (DE-588)4048792-1 |
title | The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor judicial lawmaking and its limits |
title_auth | The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor judicial lawmaking and its limits |
title_exact_search | The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor judicial lawmaking and its limits |
title_exact_search_txtP | The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor judicial lawmaking and its limits |
title_full | The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor judicial lawmaking and its limits Thomas Horsley, University of Liverpool |
title_fullStr | The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor judicial lawmaking and its limits Thomas Horsley, University of Liverpool |
title_full_unstemmed | The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor judicial lawmaking and its limits Thomas Horsley, University of Liverpool |
title_short | The Court of Justice of the European Union as an institutional actor |
title_sort | the court of justice of the european union as an institutional actor judicial lawmaking and its limits |
title_sub | judicial lawmaking and its limits |
topic | Court of Justice of the European Union Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Rechtsfortbildung (DE-588)4048792-1 gnd |
topic_facet | Court of Justice of the European Union Europäische Union Europäischer Gerichtshof Rechtsfortbildung |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032104261&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horsleythomas thecourtofjusticeoftheeuropeanunionasaninstitutionalactorjudiciallawmakinganditslimits |