On the European Court of Human Rights: an insider's retrospective (1998-2016)
In this book the author gives his views on the workings of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), where he served as a judge for 18 years. The book deals with the author's subsequent successes, defeats and tribulations while attempting to introduce into the case law of the ECtHR his previo...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
The Hague
Eleven International publishing
[2019]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | In this book the author gives his views on the workings of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), where he served as a judge for 18 years. The book deals with the author's subsequent successes, defeats and tribulations while attempting to introduce into the case law of the ECtHR his previously well thought-out theoretical convictions. These convictions can be found in his essays published in 'The Owl of Minerva: Essays on Human Rights' (2007) and his dissenting opinions which were published in 'The Owlets of Minerva' (2011). Based on his many years of experience in the field, the author examines the dialectic relationship between the rule of law and law and order; between state and individual; judicial power of logic vs executive logic of power. These dynamic contradictions are never resolved. On the contrary, they are the motor of development and inspire judicial reasoning and the balancing of justice vis-à-vis power and arbitrariness. In its almost 60 years of existence, the Court has been at the crossroads of two disparate modes of legal reasoning, the common law and the continental legal formalism. The author argues that the cause of the decline of the Court is its inability to adapt and to adopt reasoning by analogy. This thought-provoking book is of interest to academics in the field of law, human rights and constitutionalism |
| Beschreibung: | Includes index |
| Beschreibung: | xvi, 328 Seiten 25 cm |
| ISBN: | 9789462369030 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046338235 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200204 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 200116s2019 ne |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789462369030 |c hardcover |9 978-94-6236-903-0 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9789462369030 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1140146067 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1680054228 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a ne |c XA-NL | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a 86.86 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 86.85 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zupančič, Boštjan M. |d 1947- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1020640871 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the European Court of Human Rights |b an insider's retrospective (1998-2016) |c Boštjan M. Zupančič |
| 264 | 1 | |a The Hague |b Eleven International publishing |c [2019] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © | |
| 300 | |a xvi, 328 Seiten |c 25 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes index | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a In this book the author gives his views on the workings of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), where he served as a judge for 18 years. The book deals with the author's subsequent successes, defeats and tribulations while attempting to introduce into the case law of the ECtHR his previously well thought-out theoretical convictions. These convictions can be found in his essays published in 'The Owl of Minerva: Essays on Human Rights' (2007) and his dissenting opinions which were published in 'The Owlets of Minerva' (2011). Based on his many years of experience in the field, the author examines the dialectic relationship between the rule of law and law and order; between state and individual; judicial power of logic vs executive logic of power. These dynamic contradictions are never resolved. On the contrary, they are the motor of development and inspire judicial reasoning and the balancing of justice vis-à-vis power and arbitrariness. In its almost 60 years of existence, the Court has been at the crossroads of two disparate modes of legal reasoning, the common law and the continental legal formalism. The author argues that the cause of the decline of the Court is its inability to adapt and to adopt reasoning by analogy. This thought-provoking book is of interest to academics in the field of law, human rights and constitutionalism | |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1998-2016 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Geschichte 1998-2016 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-94-6274-993-1 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031714937&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20200204 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09049 |g 4 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031714937 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1805087684028268544 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROLOGUE 1
PART I GENERAL - LEGAL PHILOSOPHY
2 THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN STATU NASCENDI 5
2.1 THE AMERICAN UNDERTAKING 5
2.2 THE INTERDEPENDENCE OF DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW 6
2.3 THE SPIRIT OF THE CONVENTION 6
2.4 THE PURPOSES OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF THE CONVENTION AND
COURT 7
2.5 THE ARRIVAL OF THE NEW CENTRAL AND EAST EUROPEAN JUDGES 7
2.6 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF EUROPE? 8
2.7 THE MORAL HIGH GROUND OF THE WEST EUROPEAN STATES 9
2.8 THE RISE OF INTERNATIONAL CASE LAW 10
2.9 THE QUALITY OF THE ECTHR CASE LAW 11
2.10 THE FORTY-SEVEN PYRAMIDS? 13
2.11 THE BINDING NATURE OF THE JUDGMENTS OF THE ECTHR 14
2.11.1 THE DE FACTO BINDING NATURE OF THE ECTHR'S JUDGMENTS 15
2.11.2 THE BINDING NATURE OF THE JUDGMENTS OF THE ECTHR 15
2.11.3 THE PILOT JUDGMENTS 16
2.11.4 THE BINDING NATURE OF JUDGMENTS IN DOMESTIC LAW: DE FACTO, DE
LURE
AND AS A SOURCE OF LAW 18
2.12 THE RESIDUAL VALUES 18
2.12.1 THE SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL REMARK 19
3 IN THE CONTEXT OF COMMON LAW 21
3.1 INTRODUCTION 21
3.2 COMMON LAW AND THE CONTINENTAL LEGAL TRADITION: JUDGE-MADE VS. THE
LAW DEVELOPING FROM THE LEGISLATURE 23
3.2.1 FIRST, COMMON LAW IS A JUDGE-MADE LAW 23
3.2.2 SECOND, LIKE CASES SHOULD BE DECIDED ALIKE (STARE DECISIS): ONCE
PUBLISHED, THE JUDGMENTS BECAME BINDING PRECEDENTS 23
3.2.2.1 INTRODUCTION 24
3.2.2.2 COMMON LAW 25
3.2.2.3 THE SELF-REFERENTIAL DANGER 27
VN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3.2.2.4 CONTINENTAL LEGAL SYSTEM 29
3.2.2.5 ANTINOMY OF FACTS AND LAW 30
3.2.2.6 CODIFICATION 35
3.2.2.7 CONCLUSION 38
3.2.3 THIRD, THE CALCULABILITY (FORESEEABILITY) OF THE LAW 39
3.2.4 FOURTH, EX ANTE AND EX POST FORMATION OF THE LAW 40
3.2.5 FIFTH, DO THE JUDGES DISCOVER OR DO THEY CREATE THE LAW? 41
3.2.6 SIXTH, THE INCREMENTAL VS. THE INSTANT CREATION (DISCOVERY) OF THE
LAW 42
3.3 THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE EUROPEAN COURT
OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN STRASBOURG 44
3.3.1 THE CONVENTION 44
3.3.2 THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ECTHR) 44
3.3.3 ECTHR AND COMMON LAW 45
3.3.4 THE EXCEPTIONAL CONDITION OF CONTINENTAL LAW 46
3.4 CONCLUSION 48
4 ON THE SENSE OF JUSTICE: XIIO YA AIOE VS. LEGAL FORMALISTS 49
4.1 INTRODUCTION 49
4.2 AUTONOMOUS LEGAL REASONING: THE PRELIMINARY QUESTION 49
4.3 LEGAL EXPERT SYSTEMS 50
4.4 SINGLE JUDGE 'FORMATION' PROCEDURE 52
4.5 BACK TO LEGAL REASONING 53
4.6 PIAGET-KOHLBERG 53
4.7 ATTITUDE TOWARDS AUTHORITY 55
4.8 DISSENTING OPINION 57
4.9 AMBIVALENCE AND AMBIGUITY 63
4.10 SPOUDAIOS (CM:OU6ALOC) 65
4.11 ZHENREN 68
4.12 BACK TO REALITY 70
5 THE RULE OF LAW, RECHTSSTAAT, ETAT DE DROIT 71
5.1 RECHTSSTAAT 71
5.2 L'ETAT DE DROIT 72
5.3 JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONALITY: MARBURY V. MADISON AND THE
AMERICAN RULE OF LAW 72
5.4 THE POWER OF LOGIC VS. THE LOGIC OF POWER 73
5.4.1 THE LOGIC OF POWER NECESSITATES THE JUDICIAL POWER OF LOGIC (AND
VICE
VERSA) 74
VM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
5.5 THE PERSUASIVE POWER OF LEGAL REASONING 75
5.6 MAGNA CARTA LIBERTATUM (1215) 75
5.7 THE BINDING POWER OF INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTIONS 76
5.8 THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH 77
6 OF RIGHTS AND OF PRIVILEGES: THE MORALITY OF DUTY VS. THE MORALITY OF
ASPIRATION 79
6.1 INTRODUCTION 79
6.2 THE RIGHT AND THE REMEDY 82
6.3 THE PROCEDURAL CONTEXT 83
6.3.1 THE EXAMPLE OF ROMAN LAW 85
6.4 MODERN LAW 86
6.5 THE RIGHT AND THE LEGALITY 86
6.5.1 THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY IN CRIMINAL LAW 87
6.6 THE PRIVILEGE 88
6.7 THE TWO ECTHR CASES 89
6.7.1 E.B.V. FRANCE: THE INTRODUCTION OF THE IDEA 89
6.7.2 BOULOIS V. LUXEMBOURG: THE PRECEDENTIAL FOLLOW-UP 92
6.8 ACADEMIA 93
6.9 THE MIDDLE GROUND 94
6.10 MAJHEN V. SLOVENIA 95
6.11 CONCLUSION 97
PART II REASONING
7 TWO DIFFERENT MODES OF LEGAL REASONING 101
7.1 THE ABSTRACT AND THE CONCRETE 101
7.2 LEGAL DEFINITIONS 102
7.3 POWER AND THE REIFICATION OF LEGAL CONCEPTS 103
7.4 THE CONFLICT RESOLUTION ROLE OF THE LAW 103
7.5 HETERONOMOUS LEGAL REASONING 104
7.5.1 FORMAL AND SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE 105
7.5.2 AUTHORITARIAN AND ANTI-AUTHORITARIAN ATTITUDES OF THE JUDGES 106
7.5.3 AUTHORITARIAN LEGAL FORMALISM 107
7.5.4 EXCESSIVE DEFINITIONS 109
7.6 COMMON LAW: THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN DIFFERENT CASES 110
7.6.1 HOBBES 112
7.7 THE INSTRUMENTAL NATURE OF TRUTH FINDING 113
7.8 LEGAL FORMALISM AND THE RESOLUTION OF CONFLICTS 114
TABLE OF CONTENTS
7.8.1 CLOSED-TEXTURED VS. OPEN-TEXTURED 114
7.8.2 ROMAN LAW 116
7.8.2.1 LEX RHODIA DE IACTU 116
7.8.2.2 JUSTINIAN AND HIS CODEX IUSTINIANUS 117
7.9 THE DIFFICULT VERGE OF PRACTISING AT COMMON LAW 118
7.9.1 THE ABSENCE OF STRATEGIC SIMPLIFICATION 118
7.10 NORMS AND FACTS IN THE TWO LEGAL SYSTEMS 118
7.10.1 LEGAL PROCESS 119
7.10.2 LEIBNIZ AND HIS 'MONADS' 119
7.10.3 THE CHICKEN AND THE EGG 120
7.10.4 QUALIFICATION JURIDIQUE (LEGAL QUALIFICATION) 121
7.10.4.1 DOSTOYEVSKY 121
7.10.5 WHAT ARE THE'FACTS'? 122
7.10.6 PERCEPTION AND APPERCEPTION 123
7.11 ECTHR AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS IN EUROPE 124
8 THE SYLLOGISTIC VS. THE ANALOGICAL MODE OF REASONING 127
8.1 EMPIRICAL DEMONSTRATION: HIE RHODUS, HIE SALTA! 128
8.2 CASE STUDY: BURDEN V. THE UNITED KINGDOM (2008) 128
8.3 MY DISSENTING OPINION 129
9 THE LOGICAL COMPULSION 137
9.1 LOGICAL COMPULSION AND THE REASONING BY ANALOGY 137
9.1.1 ARGUMENTUM A MINORI AD MAIUS 138
9.1.2 ARGUMENTUM AD ABSURDUM 138
9.1.3 THE 'SLIPPERY SLOPE' ARGUMENT AND PURPOSIVE LEGAL REASONING
(TELEO-
LOGICAL METHOD) 138
PART III REMEDIES AND PRINCIPLES
10 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY RULES: REVERSAL IN THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION
ON HUMAN RIGHTS 143
10.1 ARTICLES 8, 9, 10 AND 11 OF THE CONVENTION 144
10.1.1 ARTICLE 8 144
10.1.2 THE PROPORTIONALITY TEST 144
10.1.3 ARTICLE 9 145
10.1.4 ARTICLE 10 147
10.1.5 ARTICLE 11 148
10.2 THEORETICAL DISCUSSION 149
TABLE OF CONTENTS
10.2.1 PINTO COELHO V. PORTUGAL (2016) 150
10.2.2 MEDIPRESS-SOCIEDADE JORNALISTICA, LDA V. PORTUGAL (2016) 151
10.3 CONCLUSION 152
11 THE RIGHTS AND THE REMEDIES IN THEIR PROCEDURAL CONTEXT 153
11.1 HUMAN RIGHTS IN THEIR 'ESSENCE' 157
11.2 'LIVING INSTRUMENT': THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION AS A SILENT REVOLUTION
IN CONTINENTAL LAW 160
11.2.1 THE ABSTRACT AND THE CONCRETE 160
11.2.2 INTERPRETATION 161
11.3 THE BINDING NATURE OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS 162
11.4 HOW MANY CASES? 164
11.5 HUMAN RIGHTS AS AN EPIPHENOMENON 164
11.6 EXPLICATING THE HYPOTHESIS: A FEW INTERMEDIATE CONCLUSIONS 165
11.7 THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL META-ANALYSIS 166
12 THE PROCEDURAL REMEDIES 169
12.1 THE PARTLY CONCURRING OPINION IN LUCA V. ITALY (2001) 169
12.1.1 PART II 169
12.1.2 PART III 172
12.2 THE REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE IN THE ECTHR REMEDIES 173
12.2.1 LUCA V. ITALY (SEPARATE OPINION - PART I) 173
12.2.1.1 PARTLY CONCURRING OPINION - PART I 173
12.2.2 THE SUBSTANTIVE REMEDY: SCOZZARI AND GIUNTA V. ITALY 176
12.2.2.1 DOUGLAS, ZIDAR, CHAYES AND BULTRINI 176
12.2.3 THE SCOZZARI FOLLOW-UP CASES 177
13 CAUSATION 179
13.1 INTRODUCTION 179
13.2 STATISTICAL EVIDENCE AND CLASS ACTION 180
13.3 BLAMEWORTHINESS AND IMPUTATION 182
13.4 IS OBJECTIVE REALITY ACCESSIBLE? 183
13.5 FETISHISATION OF SCIENCE 184
13.6 THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH: INQUISITORIAL AND ADVERSARY 184
13.7 THOMAS AQUINAS: ADEQUATIO INTELLECTUS ET REI 185
13.8 SHARED RESPONSIBILITY 186
13.9 THE JURY 187
13.10 GIULIANI AND GAGGIO V. ITALY AND THE PROBLEM OF ABSTRACT CAUSATION
187
13.11 MASTROMATTEO V. ITALY 189
TABLE
14
14.1
14.2
14.3
14.3.1
14.4
14.4.1
14.5
14.6
14.7
14.8
14.9
14.10
14.11
14.12
OF CONTENTS
NE BIS IN IDEM (DOUBLE JEOPARDY)
INTRODUCTION
CONCURRENCE OF OFFENCES, IDEAL AND REAL
THE LOGICAL IMPASSE
THE DIALECTICS OF NORMS AND FACTS
THE FACTS
PIRANDELLO
THE DISTINCTIVENESS OF THE HISTORICAL EVENT
COMMON LAW AND DOUBLE JEOPARDY
THE CASE OF ZDENEK SOVAK
THE RELEVANT US CASES
DIFFERENT LEGAL INCRIMINATIONS
THE LON FULLER DOCTRINE
THE BURDEN OF PROOF (ONUS PROBANDI)
CONCLUSION
191
191
191
192
192
193
194
195
195
195
196
199
200
201
201
15 IMPARTIALITY OF DECISION-MAKING AND THE PARTIALITY OF THE DECI-
SION 203
15.1 WHAT IS IMPARTIALITY? 203
15.2 HASTY DECISION MAKING: THE CASE OF ALISIC ET AL. V. SLOVENIA AND
SER-
BIA 204
15.3 KYPRIANOU V. CYPRUS 212
16 IMPARTIALITY IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL EXCURSUS
INFORMING THE JALLOH V. GERMANY AND GAFGEN V. GERMANY CASES AT
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 219
16.1 INTRODUCTION 219
16.2 FORMATION OF HYPOTHESIS (ACCUSATION) 219
16.3 INVESTIGATION 221
16.4 IMPARTIALITY 222
16.5 SYSTEMIC PROCRUSTEAN TENDENCY 225
16.6 PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE V. PRESUMPTION OF GUILT 225
16.7 THE PURSUIT OF'TRUTH' 227
16.8 THE IDEAL TYPE OF ADVERSARY PROCEDURE 229
16.9 THE INQUISITORIAL MODEL 230
16.10 CONCLUSION 231
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART HI HUMAN RIGHTS
17 WHAT ARE HUMAN RIGHTS? 235
17.1 UNIVERSALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS? 235
17.1.1 HISTORICAL IMPEDIMENT IN THE RISE OF THE NATION STATE 235
17.2 UNIVERSALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS 236
17.3 UNIVERSALITY: SUBSTANTIVE OR PROCEDURAL? 236
17.3.1 IN ROMAN LAW 236
17.3.2 PROFESSOR FRANCK'S 'UNIVERSALITY' 237
17.3.2.1 THE CLASH OF CIVILISATIONS 237
17.3.3 CULTURAL DISCREPANCIES AND THE BINDING POWER OF THE ECTHR AND
CON-
STITUTIONAL COURTS 238
17.4 HUMAN RIGHTS AS AN EPIPHENOMENON 240
17.4.1 THE INDIVIDUAL VS. THE STATE 240
18 RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND PERSONALITY RIGHTS VS. FREEDOM OF EXPRES-
SION 243
18.1 INTRODUCTION 243
18.2 REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY 243
18.2.1 OLMSTEAD V. THE UNITED STATES 243
18.2.2 HALFORDV.THEUK 244
18.3 PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS 245
18.4 ROMAN LAW 246
19 THE TREND 251
19.1 THE TWO'LUCKY STRIKE'CASES 251
19.2 THE IMMUNE SYSTEM OF THE BODY POLITIC 255
19.3 THE ECTHR TENDS TO IGNORE PARAGRAPH 2 OF ARTICLE 10 257
19.4 THE CASE FURST-PFEIFER V. AUSTRIA 258
20 THE RIGHT TO LIFE AND THE LEGAL SUBJECTIVITY OF THE NASCITURUS 263
20.1 INTRODUCTION 263
20.2 HISTORY OF ABORTION 264
20.2.1 ANCIENT SOURCES 264
20.2.1.1 CODE OF HAMMURABI (1772-1771 BC) 264
20.2.1.2 THE ASSYRIANS' CODE OF THE ASSURA (CCA. 1075 BC) 265
20.2.1.3 PENTATEUCH ACCORDING TO TALMUD (OLD TESTAMENT) 265
20.2.2 THE GREEKS 266
20.2.2.1 THE OATH OF HIPPOCRATES (460-357 BC) 266
TABLE OF CONTENTS
20.2.2.2 PLATO (428-347 BC) AND ARISTOTLE (384-322 BC) 266
20.2.3 ROMAN LAW: NASCITURUS AS LEGAL SUBJECT 266
20.2.4 MEDIEVAL LAW 268
20.2.4.1 GRATIANUS(1140) 268
20.3 CUTTING-EDGE DEVELOPMENT 268
20.3.1 LEGAL SUBJECTIVITY OF ANIMALS 268
20.4 MODERN DOMESTIC LEGAL SOURCES 269
20.4.1 THE US SUPREME COURT FEDERAL CASE OF ROE V. WADE, 410 US 113, AT
114-115(1973) 269
20.4.2 THE POSITION OF THE GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT (1975) 270
20.5 INTERNATIONAL LAW 271
20.5.1 UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (1948) 271
20.5.2 THE AMERICAN DECLARATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS (1969) 271
20.5.3 EUROPEAN DECLARATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS (1953) 271
20.5.4 INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON HUMAN AND POLITICAL RIGHTS (1966) 272
20.5.5 THE CASE OF VO V. FRANCE (2005): PETITIO PRINCIPII (BEGGING THE
QUES-
TION) 272
20.5.5.1 THE FACTS 272
20.5.5.2 THE ISSUE 273
20.5.5.3 THE HOLDING 274
20.5.5.4 THE DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GEORG RESS 274
20.5.6 LAMBERT V. FRANCE (2015) AND THE LEGAL SUBJECTIVITY OF A
NON-LIVING
HUMAN BEING 275
20.5.6.1 LEGAL SUBJECTIVITY OF AN EMBRYO OR FOETUS 277
20.5.7 THE CONVENTION AND THE COURT 278
20.5.7.1 INTERPRETATIONS: THE EUROPEAN REGIONAL LEVEL: THE ECTHR ON THE
RIGHTS
OF THE CHILD 278
20.5.7.2 IN SUMMARY 279
20.5.8 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AT THE UN INTERNATIONAL LEVEL: ARGUMENTUM AD
ABSURDUM 280
20.5.8.1 THE OVERVIEW OF THE LEGAL STATUS QUO 280
20.5.8.2 THE UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND
POLITICAL RIGHTS
(ICCPR) 281
20.6 CONCLUSION 283
21 THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN WHAT THE COURT SAYS AND WHAT THE REAL
RATIONES DECIDENDI WERE 287
21.1 INTUITION IN GENERAL 287
21.2 LEGAL INTUITION 289
TABLE OF CONTENTS
21.3 SENSE OF JUSTICE 290
21.4 BISHOP BERKELEY: LEGAL REASONING EX ANTE AND JUSTIFICATION EX POST
292
21.4.1 ARRIVING AT A DECISION 293
21.5 THE EXAMPLE OF THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION 295
21.6 THE ROLE OF LEGAL THEORY 296
21.7 THE RELEVANT PROBLEM AT THE ECTHR: THE SLIPPERY SLOPE 297
EPILOGUE
22 EPILOGUE: THE COLLAPSE OF NORMATIVE INTEGRATION 301
22.1 ASSIMILATED NORMS AND SOCIETAL FUNCTIONING 301
22.2 SOCIOLOGICALLY 302
22.3 INDIVIDUALLY 302
22.3.1 OEDIPALIZATION 302
22.3.2 BOYS 302
22.3.3 GIRLS 303
22.3.4 CAROLE PATEMAN 303
22.3.5 THE UNIVERSALITY OF THE OEDIPAL TRIANGLE 304
22.3.6 ENDOCRINOLOGICAL ASPECT 305
22.4 ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS 305
22.4.1 DE-MASCULINISATION OF THE BRAIN 306
22.4.2 HOW DOES DE-MASCULINIZATION AFFECT NORMATIVE INTEGRATION? 307
22.4.3 OBSERVABLE FEMINISATION OF MEN 307
22.4.4 FATAL EFFECT UPON THE IDENTIFICATION WITH THE FATHER 308
22.4.5 ADOPTION OF RUDIMENTARY DISTINCTION BETWEEN RIGHT AND WRONG 309
22.4.6 WHAT KIND OF MORALITY WILL THE BOY ADOPT? 309
22.5 THE EPIDEMIC OF SEXUAL NON-DIFFERENTIATION 310
22.5.1 GENERATIONAL ACCUMULATION OF DEGENERATIONS 311
22.5.2 COLLECTIVE DENIAL AND POLITICAL CORRECTNESS 311
22.5.3 FATHER AND SON 311
22.6 LACAN'S 'LAW' IS NOW COMING FROM WOMEN 312
22.6.1 SUBVERSION 313
22.6.2 IMPOSTORS 313
22.6.3 ANOMIE 314
22.6.4 FEMINISM 315
22.6.5 BRUNO BETTELHEIM AND THE'ACTING-OUT OF THE OEDIPAL CONFLICT' 316
22.7 TENTATIVE CONCLUSION 317
22.8 PROGNOSIS 317
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX 319
CASE LAW 325 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Zupančič, Boštjan M. 1947- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1020640871 |
| author_facet | Zupančič, Boštjan M. 1947- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Zupančič, Boštjan M. 1947- |
| author_variant | b m z bm bmz |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046338235 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1140146067 (DE-599)KXP1680054228 |
| era | Geschichte 1998-2016 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1998-2016 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046338235</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200204</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200116s2019 ne |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789462369030</subfield><subfield code="c">hardcover</subfield><subfield code="9">978-94-6236-903-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789462369030</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1140146067</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1680054228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ne</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-NL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.86</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.85</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zupančič, Boštjan M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1947-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1020640871</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the European Court of Human Rights</subfield><subfield code="b">an insider's retrospective (1998-2016)</subfield><subfield code="c">Boštjan M. Zupančič</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">The Hague</subfield><subfield code="b">Eleven International publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">[2019]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xvi, 328 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">25 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this book the author gives his views on the workings of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), where he served as a judge for 18 years. The book deals with the author's subsequent successes, defeats and tribulations while attempting to introduce into the case law of the ECtHR his previously well thought-out theoretical convictions. These convictions can be found in his essays published in 'The Owl of Minerva: Essays on Human Rights' (2007) and his dissenting opinions which were published in 'The Owlets of Minerva' (2011). Based on his many years of experience in the field, the author examines the dialectic relationship between the rule of law and law and order; between state and individual; judicial power of logic vs executive logic of power. These dynamic contradictions are never resolved. On the contrary, they are the motor of development and inspire judicial reasoning and the balancing of justice vis-à-vis power and arbitrariness. In its almost 60 years of existence, the Court has been at the crossroads of two disparate modes of legal reasoning, the common law and the continental legal formalism. The author argues that the cause of the decline of the Court is its inability to adapt and to adopt reasoning by analogy. This thought-provoking book is of interest to academics in the field of law, human rights and constitutionalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1003803-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1998-2016</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1003803-6</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1998-2016</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-94-6274-993-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031714937&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20200204</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09049</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031714937</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV046338235 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-20T08:56:02Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789462369030 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031714937 |
| oclc_num | 1140146067 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | xvi, 328 Seiten 25 cm |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20200204 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Eleven International publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Zupančič, Boštjan M. 1947- Verfasser (DE-588)1020640871 aut On the European Court of Human Rights an insider's retrospective (1998-2016) Boštjan M. Zupančič The Hague Eleven International publishing [2019] © xvi, 328 Seiten 25 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Includes index In this book the author gives his views on the workings of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), where he served as a judge for 18 years. The book deals with the author's subsequent successes, defeats and tribulations while attempting to introduce into the case law of the ECtHR his previously well thought-out theoretical convictions. These convictions can be found in his essays published in 'The Owl of Minerva: Essays on Human Rights' (2007) and his dissenting opinions which were published in 'The Owlets of Minerva' (2011). Based on his many years of experience in the field, the author examines the dialectic relationship between the rule of law and law and order; between state and individual; judicial power of logic vs executive logic of power. These dynamic contradictions are never resolved. On the contrary, they are the motor of development and inspire judicial reasoning and the balancing of justice vis-à-vis power and arbitrariness. In its almost 60 years of existence, the Court has been at the crossroads of two disparate modes of legal reasoning, the common law and the continental legal formalism. The author argues that the cause of the decline of the Court is its inability to adapt and to adopt reasoning by analogy. This thought-provoking book is of interest to academics in the field of law, human rights and constitutionalism Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 1998-2016 gnd rswk-swf Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 b Geschichte 1998-2016 z DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-94-6274-993-1 SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031714937&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Zupančič, Boštjan M. 1947- On the European Court of Human Rights an insider's retrospective (1998-2016) Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)1003803-6 |
| title | On the European Court of Human Rights an insider's retrospective (1998-2016) |
| title_auth | On the European Court of Human Rights an insider's retrospective (1998-2016) |
| title_exact_search | On the European Court of Human Rights an insider's retrospective (1998-2016) |
| title_full | On the European Court of Human Rights an insider's retrospective (1998-2016) Boštjan M. Zupančič |
| title_fullStr | On the European Court of Human Rights an insider's retrospective (1998-2016) Boštjan M. Zupančič |
| title_full_unstemmed | On the European Court of Human Rights an insider's retrospective (1998-2016) Boštjan M. Zupančič |
| title_short | On the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_sort | on the european court of human rights an insider s retrospective 1998 2016 |
| title_sub | an insider's retrospective (1998-2016) |
| topic | Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031714937&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zupancicbostjanm ontheeuropeancourtofhumanrightsaninsidersretrospective19982016 |