Judging Democracy:
In Judging Democracy, Christopher Manfredi and Mark Rush challenge assertions that the Canadian and American Supreme Courts have taken radically different approaches to constitutional interpretation regarding general and democratic rights. Three case studies compare Canadian and American law concern...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Toronto
University of Toronto Press
[2019]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FHA01 FKE01 FLA01 UPA01 UBG01 FAB01 FCO01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | In Judging Democracy, Christopher Manfredi and Mark Rush challenge assertions that the Canadian and American Supreme Courts have taken radically different approaches to constitutional interpretation regarding general and democratic rights. Three case studies compare Canadian and American law concerning prisoners' voting rights, the scope and definition of voting rights, and campaign spending. These examples demonstrate that the two Supreme Courts have engaged in essentially the same debates concerning the franchise, access to the ballot, and the concept of a "meaningful" vote. They reveal that the American Supreme Court has never been entirely individualistic in its interpretation and protection of constitutional rights and that there are important similarities in the two Supreme Courts' approaches to constitutional interpretation. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that an astonishing convergence has occurred in the two courts' thinking concerning the integrity of the democratic process and the need for the judiciary to monitor legislative attempts to regulate the political process in order to promote or ensure political equality. Growing numbers of justices in both courts are now wary of legislative attempts to cloak laws designed to protect incumbents through electoral reform. Judging Democracy thus points to a new direction not only in judicial review and constitutional interpretation but also in democratic theory |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Jul 2019) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
| ISBN: | 9781442689756 |
| DOI: | 10.3138/9781442689756 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046090139 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190806s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781442689756 |9 978-1-4426-8975-6 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3138/9781442689756 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9781442689756 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1112135758 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046090139 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-Aug4 |a DE-859 |a DE-860 |a DE-739 |a DE-473 |a DE-1043 |a DE-858 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.7107 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Manfredi, Christopher |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Judging Democracy |c Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush |
| 264 | 1 | |a Toronto |b University of Toronto Press |c [2019] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Jul 2019) | ||
| 520 | |a In Judging Democracy, Christopher Manfredi and Mark Rush challenge assertions that the Canadian and American Supreme Courts have taken radically different approaches to constitutional interpretation regarding general and democratic rights. Three case studies compare Canadian and American law concerning prisoners' voting rights, the scope and definition of voting rights, and campaign spending. These examples demonstrate that the two Supreme Courts have engaged in essentially the same debates concerning the franchise, access to the ballot, and the concept of a "meaningful" vote. They reveal that the American Supreme Court has never been entirely individualistic in its interpretation and protection of constitutional rights and that there are important similarities in the two Supreme Courts' approaches to constitutional interpretation. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that an astonishing convergence has occurred in the two courts' thinking concerning the integrity of the democratic process and the need for the judiciary to monitor legislative attempts to regulate the political process in order to promote or ensure political equality. Growing numbers of justices in both courts are now wary of legislative attempts to cloak laws designed to protect incumbents through electoral reform. Judging Democracy thus points to a new direction not only in judicial review and constitutional interpretation but also in democratic theory | ||
| 546 | |a In English | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Coursebook | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / Judicial Branch |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law |z Canada |v Cases | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law |z United States |v Cases | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Democracy |z Canada | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Democracy |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Election law |z Canada |v Cases | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Election law |z United States |v Cases | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Demokratie |0 (DE-588)4011413-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wahlrecht |0 (DE-588)4064302-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Staatsrecht |0 (DE-588)4056666-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Kanada |0 (DE-588)4029456-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kanada |0 (DE-588)4029456-0 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Demokratie |0 (DE-588)4011413-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Wahlrecht |0 (DE-588)4064302-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Staatsrecht |0 (DE-588)4056666-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rush, Mark |4 aut | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031471141 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 |l FHA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FHA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 |l FKE01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 |l FLA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 |l UPA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 |l FAB01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 |l FCO01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804180388400070656 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Manfredi, Christopher Rush, Mark |
| author_facet | Manfredi, Christopher Rush, Mark |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Manfredi, Christopher |
| author_variant | c m cm m r mr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046090139 |
| collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9781442689756 (OCoLC)1112135758 (DE-599)BVBBV046090139 |
| dewey-full | 342.7107 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.7107 |
| dewey-search | 342.7107 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.7107 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3138/9781442689756 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04468nmm a2200685zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046090139</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190806s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4426-8975-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9781442689756</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1112135758</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046090139</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Aug4</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manfredi, Christopher</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judging Democracy</subfield><subfield code="c">Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Toronto</subfield><subfield code="b">University of Toronto Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2019]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Jul 2019)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In Judging Democracy, Christopher Manfredi and Mark Rush challenge assertions that the Canadian and American Supreme Courts have taken radically different approaches to constitutional interpretation regarding general and democratic rights. Three case studies compare Canadian and American law concerning prisoners' voting rights, the scope and definition of voting rights, and campaign spending. These examples demonstrate that the two Supreme Courts have engaged in essentially the same debates concerning the franchise, access to the ballot, and the concept of a "meaningful" vote. They reveal that the American Supreme Court has never been entirely individualistic in its interpretation and protection of constitutional rights and that there are important similarities in the two Supreme Courts' approaches to constitutional interpretation. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that an astonishing convergence has occurred in the two courts' thinking concerning the integrity of the democratic process and the need for the judiciary to monitor legislative attempts to regulate the political process in order to promote or ensure political equality. Growing numbers of justices in both courts are now wary of legislative attempts to cloak laws designed to protect incumbents through electoral reform. Judging Democracy thus points to a new direction not only in judicial review and constitutional interpretation but also in democratic theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coursebook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / Judicial Branch</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Democracy</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Democracy</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Election law</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Election law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Demokratie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011413-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wahlrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4064302-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Staatsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056666-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kanada</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4029456-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kanada</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4029456-0</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Demokratie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011413-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Wahlrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4064302-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Staatsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056666-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rush, Mark</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031471141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="l">FHA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FHA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="l">FKE01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="l">FLA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="l">FAB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756</subfield><subfield code="l">FCO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Kanada (DE-588)4029456-0 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Kanada |
| id | DE-604.BV046090139 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:34:58Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781442689756 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031471141 |
| oclc_num | 1112135758 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-1043 DE-858 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-1043 DE-858 |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FHA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | University of Toronto Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Manfredi, Christopher Verfasser aut Judging Democracy Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush Toronto University of Toronto Press [2019] © 2013 1 online resource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Jul 2019) In Judging Democracy, Christopher Manfredi and Mark Rush challenge assertions that the Canadian and American Supreme Courts have taken radically different approaches to constitutional interpretation regarding general and democratic rights. Three case studies compare Canadian and American law concerning prisoners' voting rights, the scope and definition of voting rights, and campaign spending. These examples demonstrate that the two Supreme Courts have engaged in essentially the same debates concerning the franchise, access to the ballot, and the concept of a "meaningful" vote. They reveal that the American Supreme Court has never been entirely individualistic in its interpretation and protection of constitutional rights and that there are important similarities in the two Supreme Courts' approaches to constitutional interpretation. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that an astonishing convergence has occurred in the two courts' thinking concerning the integrity of the democratic process and the need for the judiciary to monitor legislative attempts to regulate the political process in order to promote or ensure political equality. Growing numbers of justices in both courts are now wary of legislative attempts to cloak laws designed to protect incumbents through electoral reform. Judging Democracy thus points to a new direction not only in judicial review and constitutional interpretation but also in democratic theory In English Coursebook POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh Constitutional law Canada Cases Constitutional law United States Cases Democracy Canada Democracy United States Election law Canada Cases Election law United States Cases Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd rswk-swf Wahlrecht (DE-588)4064302-5 gnd rswk-swf Staatsrecht (DE-588)4056666-3 gnd rswk-swf Kanada (DE-588)4029456-0 gnd rswk-swf Kanada (DE-588)4029456-0 g Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 s Wahlrecht (DE-588)4064302-5 s Staatsrecht (DE-588)4056666-3 s 1\p DE-604 Rush, Mark aut https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Manfredi, Christopher Rush, Mark Judging Democracy Coursebook POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh Constitutional law Canada Cases Constitutional law United States Cases Democracy Canada Democracy United States Election law Canada Cases Election law United States Cases Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd Wahlrecht (DE-588)4064302-5 gnd Staatsrecht (DE-588)4056666-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4011413-2 (DE-588)4064302-5 (DE-588)4056666-3 (DE-588)4029456-0 |
| title | Judging Democracy |
| title_auth | Judging Democracy |
| title_exact_search | Judging Democracy |
| title_full | Judging Democracy Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush |
| title_fullStr | Judging Democracy Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush |
| title_full_unstemmed | Judging Democracy Christopher Manfredi, Mark Rush |
| title_short | Judging Democracy |
| title_sort | judging democracy |
| topic | Coursebook POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh Constitutional law Canada Cases Constitutional law United States Cases Democracy Canada Democracy United States Election law Canada Cases Election law United States Cases Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd Wahlrecht (DE-588)4064302-5 gnd Staatsrecht (DE-588)4056666-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | Coursebook POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / Judicial Branch Constitutional law Canada Cases Constitutional law United States Cases Democracy Canada Democracy United States Election law Canada Cases Election law United States Cases Demokratie Wahlrecht Staatsrecht Kanada |
| url | https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689756 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT manfredichristopher judgingdemocracy AT rushmark judgingdemocracy |