The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU: living in different worlds
This report analyzes and compares the security strategies of four major international actors: the United States, China, Russia and the European Union. The rules-based liberal international order is increasingly under strain due to tightening geopolitical competition and the decline of the Western he...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Helsinki
Finnish Institute of International Affairs
June 2018
|
| Schriftenreihe: | FIIA report
56 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext Literaturverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | This report analyzes and compares the security strategies of four major international actors: the United States, China, Russia and the European Union. The rules-based liberal international order is increasingly under strain due to tightening geopolitical competition and the decline of the Western hegemony. In this context, the report explores the conceptions of the four major powers with regard to the world order, the self-defined position of each actor in it, and their possible aspirations to change the existing order. Furthermore, the report analyzes how each strategy defines security threats and risks, as well as ways to address these threats.The report highlights the ongoing rapid change of global structures and instruments of power as a challenge addressed in all four strategies. Increased competition is visible not only in the field of military power, but also in economic relations and at the level of values. While the US strategy defines Russia and China as key adversaries whose increasing influence is to be contained, both Russia and China correspondingly aim at building a counterweight to the US power in a multipolar world. Among the four actors, only the EU maintains a strong commitment to the rules-based order and explicitly rejects a worldview centred around zero-sum rivalry between great powers. |
| Beschreibung: | 74 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9789517695718 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046061491 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20191016 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 190723s2018 xx b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789517695718 |c (pbk.) |9 978-951-769-571-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1110048526 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046061491 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Raik, Kristi |d 1975- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1071492624 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU |b living in different worlds |c Kristi Raik, Mika Aaltola, Jyrki Kallio and Katri Pynnöniemi |
| 264 | 1 | |a Helsinki |b Finnish Institute of International Affairs |c June 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 74 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a FIIA report |v 56 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a This report analyzes and compares the security strategies of four major international actors: the United States, China, Russia and the European Union. The rules-based liberal international order is increasingly under strain due to tightening geopolitical competition and the decline of the Western hegemony. In this context, the report explores the conceptions of the four major powers with regard to the world order, the self-defined position of each actor in it, and their possible aspirations to change the existing order. Furthermore, the report analyzes how each strategy defines security threats and risks, as well as ways to address these threats.The report highlights the ongoing rapid change of global structures and instruments of power as a challenge addressed in all four strategies. Increased competition is visible not only in the field of military power, but also in economic relations and at the level of values. While the US strategy defines Russia and China as key adversaries whose increasing influence is to be contained, both Russia and China correspondingly aim at building a counterweight to the US power in a multipolar world. Among the four actors, only the EU maintains a strong commitment to the rules-based order and explicitly rejects a worldview centred around zero-sum rivalry between great powers. | |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sicherheitspolitik |0 (DE-588)4116489-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a China |0 (DE-588)4009937-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Russland |0 (DE-588)4076899-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Russia (Federation) / Military policy | |
| 653 | 2 | |a China / Military policy | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States / Military policy | |
| 653 | 2 | |a European Union countries / Military policy | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Russia (Federation) / Security Strategy | |
| 653 | 2 | |a China / Security Strategy | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States / Security Strategy | |
| 653 | 2 | |a European Union countries / Security Strategy | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Military policy | |
| 653 | 2 | |a China | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Europe / European Union countries | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Russia (Federation) | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a China |0 (DE-588)4009937-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Russland |0 (DE-588)4076899-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Sicherheitspolitik |0 (DE-588)4116489-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aaltola, Mika |d 1969- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1150186895 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kallio, Jyrki |d 1965- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1139391267 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pynnöniemi, Katri |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1191222012 |4 aut | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Ulkopoliittinen Instituutti (Helsinki) |0 (DE-588)5097855-X |4 isb | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-951-769-570-1 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/the-security-strategies-of-the-us-china-russia-and-the-eu |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031442805&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 912 | |a ebook | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20191016 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 181 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 471 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031442805 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820142923026530304 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
REFERENCES Aaltola, M., Käpylä, J. and Vuorisalo, V. (2014). “The Challenge of Global Commons and Flows to us Power”. London: Routledge. Aspaturian, V.V. (1980), “Soviet global power and the correlation of forces”, Problems of Communism, May'lune. Balfour, R., Carta, C. and Raik, K. (eds.) (2015), Vie European External Action Service and National Foreign Ministries: Convergence or DivergenceÍ Farnham: Ashgate. Baylis, J., Wirtz, JJ. and Gray, C.S. (eds.) (2015), Strategy in the Contemporary World: An Introduction to Strategic Studies (5th edition), Oxford: Oxford University Press. Belozerov, V. (2016), “Ot strategii natsionalnoi bezopasnosti ֊ к globalnomu і perspektivnomu strategicheskomu proektrirovaniyu”, Vlasť, N0.7. Biscop, S. (2004), “The European Security Strategy. Implementing a Distinctive Approach to Security”, Brussels: Royal Defence College (irsd-khid), March, http:// www. egmontinstitute. be /wp- con tent/ uploads/2004/03/Artikel.ESS. pdf. Bogdanov, У. (2015), “Otkritost strany priznali usloviem natsionalnoi bezopasnosti”, Vzglyad, October 27, https:// vz.ru/politics/2015/10/22/77379t· html, accessed 24 May 2018. ccrv.com English (2017), “Xi’s world vision: a community of common destiny, a shared home for humanity”, 15 January, http://english.cctv.com/2017/01/15/ ARTljfECMORxn4TrlIoUqAcli70il5· shtml, accessed 6 February 2018. China File (2013), “Document 9·· A ChinaFile Translation”, 8 November 2013, http:// www.chinaftle.com/document-9-chinaftletranslation, accessed 7 May 2018. Council of the European Union (2016), “Council Conclusions on implementing the eu
Global Strategy in the area of Security and Defence”, 14149/16, Brussels, 14 November. Council of the European Union (2017), “Council Decision establishing Permanent Structured Cooperation (pesco) and determining the list of Participating Member States”, 14866/17, Brussels, 8 December. cpc News (2015), “Zhong-Gong Zhongyang Zhengjiju zhaokai huiyi, shenyi tongguo ‘Guojia Anquan Zhanliie Gangyao’”, 23 January, http:// cpc.people.com.cn/n/20l5/oi23/c6409426440906.html, accessed 10 October 2016. de France, O. and Whitney, N. (2013), “Europe’s Strategic Cacophony”, Policy Brief, European Council for Foreign Relations, April. Egorov, I. (2015a), “60 Príznakov Ugrozy”, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 22 October. Egorov, 1. (2015b), “Vyzov Prinyat”, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 22 December. European Commission (2016), “European Defence Action Plan”, com (2016) 950 final, Brussels, 30 November. European Commission (2017), “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Launching the European Defence Fund”, сом(2017) 295 hnal, Brussels, 7 June. European Union (2016), “Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy”, June, https.-//ec.europa. eu/fmland/news/global_i60630_ft. European Union (2015), “Strategic Review The European Union in a changing global environment”, 25 June, https://europa, eu/globalstrategy/en/strategic-revieweuropean-union-changing-globalenvironment, accessed 24 May 2018. European Union and nato (2016),
“Statement on the implementation of the Joint Declaration signed by the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission, and the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization”, 6 December, https://www. nato.int/cps/en/natohq/offtciaLtextsU38829. htm?selectedLocale=en, accessed 24 May 2018. Feaver, Peter (2017), “Five Takeaways From Trump’s National Security Strategy”, Foreign Policy, 28 December, http:// fore ignpolicy. com / 2017/12 /18 / five ֊ FIIA REPORT JUNE 20J8 / 67
takeaways-from-trumps-nationalsecurity-strategy/, accessed 24 May 2018. Federation Council (2017), “Press release after the first meeting of the Commission”, 7 June, http://www.council.gov.ru/events/ news/81751/, accessed 24 May 2018. Fenghuangwang (2014), “Zhongguo fabu shoubu guojiaanquan lanpishu”, 7 May, http:// news.ifeng.eom/a/20140507/40180506_o. shtml, accessed 6 February 2018. Foreign Ministry of the prc (2002), “China’s Position Paper on the New Security Concept”, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/ceun/eng/ xw/t27742.htm, accessed 7 May 2018. Gareev, M. (2008), “Strategicheskoe Sderzhivanie: problemy i resheniya”, Krasnaya Zvezda, 8 October. Gerasimov, V. (2013), “Tsennost nauki v predvidenii”, VoennoPromislennii Kurer, 8 (476). Goldstein, J. andKeohane, R.O. (eds.) (1993), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, New York: Cornell University Press. Gordeev, V. (2015), “Putin poruchil skorrektirovať strategiyu natsionaľnoi bezopasnosti”, RBC, 3 July, https://www.rbc.ru/ politics/03/07/20i5/5596b44f9a79474dce82447d, accessed 24 May 2018. Howorth, J. (2014), Security and Defence Policy in the European Union (2nd edition), Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan. Ikenberry, GJ. (2018), “The End of Liberal International Order?”, International Affairs, 94:1 (7-23). Khanna, P. (2016), Connectography·· Mapping the Future of Global Civilization, New York: Random House. Lehne, S. (2014), “Relaunching the European Neighborhood Policy”, Carnegie Europe, http:// carnegieeurope.eu/ strategiceurope / ? fa=57492, accessed 24 May 2018. Lipatov, Y. (2015),
“Zayavlenia Vladimir Putin 0 strategii natsionalnoi bezopasnosti strany і reaktsii na sanktsii Zapada”, 3 July, main government τν channel, https:// www.1tv.ru/news/2015-07-03/16131zayavleniya_vladimira_putina_o_strategii. Liu Tuyao Cheng Ruishan (2006), “Shilun Zhou Enlai de qiutong-cunyi waijiao sixiang”, Renminwang, http://cpc.people. com.cn/GB/69112/75843/75873/5168786. html, accessed 7 May 2018. Liu Yuejin (2017), “Guojia anquan zhanliie jiqi wanshan”, Xin Shiye 4, pp. 5-10. Monaghan, A. (2013), “Putin’s Russia: shaping a ‘grand strategy’?”, International Affairs, 89:5 (1221-1236). 68 / JUNE 2018 FIIA REPORT National Intelligence Council (2017), “Global Trends: Paradox of Progress”, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, U.S.A., https://www.dni.gov/ftles/documents/nic/ GT-Full-Report.pdf, accessed 24 May 2018. Nye, J. (2010), “The Future of American Power: Dominance and Decline in Perspective”, Foreign Affairs, Nov/Dec. https://www. foreignaffairs.com/artides/2010-11-01/futureamerican-power, accessed 24 May 2018. Paterson, P. (2018), “The Origins of us Foreign Policy”, William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies, Occasional Papers. National Defense University, https:// www.williamjperrycenter.org/sites/ default/ftles / pubUcation_associated_files / Origins%20of%20US%2oForeign%20 Policy.pdf, accessed 24 May 2018. Patrushev, N. (2015), “Velikaya Pobeda v Velikoi Voine”, Krasnaya Zvezda, 5 May, http:// archive.redstar.ru/index.php/2011-07-2515-57-07/item/23494-nikolaj-patrushevsekretar - sověta-bezopasnosti - rf-velikaya pobeda-v-velikoj-vojne,
accessed 10 June 2018. People.com.cn (2015), “Zhengzhiju huiyi tongguo ‘Guojiaanquanzhanlüegangyao’”, 25 January, http://politics.people.com. СП/П/2015/0125/СЮОІ-26445047. html, accessed 10 October 2016. People's Daily Online (2017), “China mobilizes students, pensioners to join anti-espionage drive”, 21 April, http://en.people. сп/пз/20і7/042і/с90000֊9205922. html, accessed 6 February 2018. Pynnöniemi, K. (2014), “ScienceFiction: President Medvedev’s Campaign for Russia’s Technological Modernization”, Democratizatsiya: The Journal of PostSoviet Democratization, 22:4 (605-625). Pynnöniemi, К. (2010), “Russia’s Modernization Reloaded: Political Constraints on Economic Development”, fjia Briefing Paper 67, Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs, https·./ /www.ftia.ft/en/publication/russiasmodernization-reloaded, accessed 24 May 2018. Pynnöniemi, К. and Rácz, A. (eds.) (2016), Fog of Falsehood. Russian Strategy of Deception and the Conflict in Ukraine, Report No. 45, Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, http://www.ftia.ft/ft/publication/588/ fog_of_falsehood/, accessed 24 May 2018. Pynnöniemi, К., (2013), “Strateginen suunnittelu Putinin Venäjällä” [Strategie Planning in Putin’s Russia], Idäntutkimus, No. 3. Russian National Security Strategy (Presidential edict N683, approved on 31 December 2015). Russian National Security Strategy, Article 19 (Presidential edict N537, approved on 12 May 2009).
Slaughter, A-M. (2017), The Chessboard and the Web: Strategies of Connection in a Networked World, New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Smith, M.E. (2011), “A liberal grand strategy in a realist world? Power, purpose and the eu’s changing global role”, tournai of European Public Policy 18(2): 144-163. South China Morning Post (2017), “China’s top court lists jailing rights activists as its biggest achievement”, 12 March, http://www. scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/ article/2078i67/chinas-top-courts֊list-jailingrights-activists-their, accessed 6 February 2018. Spence, D. and Bátora, J. (eds.) (2015), The European External Action Service: European Diplomacy Post-Westphalia, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan. State Council of PRC (2017), “China’s Policies on Asia-Paciftc Security Cooperation”, 11 January, http : // english .gov .cn / archive / white _ paper/20i7/oi/ii/content_28i475539078636. htm, accessed 24 May 2018. Stolberg, A.G. (2012), “How nation-states craft national security strategies”, U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute. Sturgeon, D. (ed.) (2011), Chinese Text Profeet, http://ctext.org, accessed 6 February 2018. Thomas, T. (2017), Kremlin kontrol. Russia’s political military reality, Foreign Military Studies Office (fmso), Fort Leavenworth, ks. Tocci, N. (2017), Framing the ευ Global Strategy: A Stronger Europe in a Fragile World, Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan. Toje, A. (2011), “The European Union as a Small Power”, Journal of Common Market Studies 49(1): 43-60. Vimont, P. (2015), “The Path to an Upgraded eu Foreign Policy”, Policy
Outlook, Carnegie Europe, 30 June, http://carnegieeurope. eu/20i5/o6/3o/path֊to-upgraded-eu֊foreignpoliey/ib7p, accessed 21 February 2017. Vzglyad (201s), “Patrushev: Rossiya skorrektiruet strategiya natsbezopasnosti iz-za novyih ugroz”, 5 May, https:// vz.ru/news/20i5/5/5/743 7i2.html, accessed 24 May 2018. Wuthnow, J. (2017), Chinese Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative: Strategic Rationales, Risks, and implications. China Strategic Perspectives 12. Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Institute for National Strategic Studies, Washington, D.C.: National Defence Press, http://inss.ndu.edu/Media/ News/Article/1326963/chinese-perspectives֊ on-the-belt-and-road-initiative-strategicrationales-risks/, accessed 7 May 2018. Xi Jinping (2017), “Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era”. Speech delivered at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, October 18, 2017, http://www. xinhuanet.com/english/download/Xi_ Jinping»A27s_report_at_i9th_CPC_National_ Congress.pdf, accessed 6 February 2018. Xinhua (2015), “Full text: China’s Military Strategy”, 25 May, http://chinadaily.com. cn/china/20i5֊05/26/content_2o820628. htm, accessed 5 October 2017. Xinhuanet (2017), “China urges U.S. to abandon Cold War mentality”, 19 December, http://www.xinhuanet. com/english/20i7֊i2/i9/c_ 136838057. htm, accessed 6 February 2018. Xinhuanet(20i8), ‘“Cold War’ mentality for U.S. to play up ‘Chinese military threat’”: spokesperson,
21 January, http://www.xinhuanet.com/ english/20i8֊oi/2i/c_i369i2454· htm, accessed 22 January 2018. Xinhuawang (2014), “Xi Jinping: Jianchi zongti guojia anquanguan, zou Zhongguo tese guojia anquan daolu”, 15 April, http://news.xinhuanet.com/ politics/20i4-04/i5/c_ni02539io. htm, accessed 21 March 2017. Xinhuawang (2016), “Zhong-Gong Zhongyang Zhengzhiju zhaokai huiyi, fenxi yanjiu 2017 nian jingji gongzuo”, 9 December, http://www.xinhuanet. com/politics/20i6֊i2/o9/c_H20089875. htm, accessed 6 February 2018. Xinhuawang (2017), “Full text of resolution on amendment to cpc Constitution”, 24 October, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2017֊ io/24/c_l36702726.htm, accessed? May 2018. Ye Zicheng (2014), “Chuantong wenhuajinghua yu Xi Jinping zhiguo linian”, Renmin Luntan, 7 February, http://theory.people. com.en/n/2014/0207/c112851-24291830. html, accessed 9 December 2014. Youngs, R. (2015), “The European Union; inclusion as geopolitics”, in K. Kausch (ed.) Geopolitics and Democracy in the Middle East, Madrid: fride. Zarroli, Jim (2015), “New Asian Development Bank Seen As Sign Of China’s Growing Influence”, npr, 16 April, https://www.npr. org/20i5/o4/i6/400i78364/fmance֊offteialsto-discuss֊asian֊development-bank֊atspring-meetings, accessed? May 2018. ZhangZhizhong. 2015. “Dalushenyi tongguo ‘Guojia anquan zhanliie gangyao’ chu xi.” Dalu yu liang’an qingshi jianbao 2015.2: 1-4. R.O. China Mainland Affairs Council. Zhong Guo’an. 2017. “Yi Xi Jinping zongshuji zongti guojia anquanguan wei zhiyin, puxie FIIA REPORT JUNE 2018 / 69
guojia anquan xin pianzhang.” QStheory.cn. http: / /www.qstheory.cn/dukan/qs/201704/15/^1120788993.htm, accessed 8 Feb. 2018. Zhongguo Xinwenwang. 2014. “Baogao: Zhongguo yishixingtai anquan zongti wending, reng mianlin yanjun tiaozhan”. Zhongguo Xinwenwang, 6 May 2014. http-7/www. chinanews.com/gn/2014/05-06/6136974. shtmi, accessed 6 February 2018. 70 / JUNE 2018 FIIA REPORT |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Raik, Kristi 1975- Aaltola, Mika 1969- Kallio, Jyrki 1965- Pynnöniemi, Katri |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1071492624 (DE-588)1150186895 (DE-588)1139391267 (DE-588)1191222012 |
| author_facet | Raik, Kristi 1975- Aaltola, Mika 1969- Kallio, Jyrki 1965- Pynnöniemi, Katri |
| author_role | aut aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Raik, Kristi 1975- |
| author_variant | k r kr m a ma j k jk k p kp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046061491 |
| collection | ebook |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1110048526 (DE-599)BVBBV046061491 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046061491</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20191016</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190723s2018 xx b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789517695718</subfield><subfield code="c">(pbk.)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-951-769-571-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1110048526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046061491</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raik, Kristi</subfield><subfield code="d">1975-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071492624</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU</subfield><subfield code="b">living in different worlds</subfield><subfield code="c">Kristi Raik, Mika Aaltola, Jyrki Kallio and Katri Pynnöniemi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Helsinki</subfield><subfield code="b">Finnish Institute of International Affairs</subfield><subfield code="c">June 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FIIA report</subfield><subfield code="v">56</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This report analyzes and compares the security strategies of four major international actors: the United States, China, Russia and the European Union. The rules-based liberal international order is increasingly under strain due to tightening geopolitical competition and the decline of the Western hegemony. In this context, the report explores the conceptions of the four major powers with regard to the world order, the self-defined position of each actor in it, and their possible aspirations to change the existing order. Furthermore, the report analyzes how each strategy defines security threats and risks, as well as ways to address these threats.The report highlights the ongoing rapid change of global structures and instruments of power as a challenge addressed in all four strategies. Increased competition is visible not only in the field of military power, but also in economic relations and at the level of values. While the US strategy defines Russia and China as key adversaries whose increasing influence is to be contained, both Russia and China correspondingly aim at building a counterweight to the US power in a multipolar world. Among the four actors, only the EU maintains a strong commitment to the rules-based order and explicitly rejects a worldview centred around zero-sum rivalry between great powers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sicherheitspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116489-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">China</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4009937-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Russland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076899-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Russia (Federation) / Military policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">China / Military policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Military policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">European Union countries / Military policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Russia (Federation) / Security Strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">China / Security Strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Security Strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">European Union countries / Security Strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Military policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Europe / European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Russia (Federation)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">China</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4009937-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Russland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076899-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sicherheitspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116489-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aaltola, Mika</subfield><subfield code="d">1969-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1150186895</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kallio, Jyrki</subfield><subfield code="d">1965-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1139391267</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pynnöniemi, Katri</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1191222012</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ulkopoliittinen Instituutti (Helsinki)</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5097855-X</subfield><subfield code="4">isb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-951-769-570-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/the-security-strategies-of-the-us-china-russia-and-the-eu</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031442805&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20191016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031442805</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | China (DE-588)4009937-4 gnd USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd |
| geographic_facet | China USA Russland |
| id | DE-604.BV046061491 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T13:12:37Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | (DE-588)5097855-X |
| isbn | 9789517695718 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031442805 |
| oclc_num | 1110048526 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 74 Seiten |
| psigel | ebook BSB_NED_20191016 |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Finnish Institute of International Affairs |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | FIIA report |
| spelling | Raik, Kristi 1975- Verfasser (DE-588)1071492624 aut The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU living in different worlds Kristi Raik, Mika Aaltola, Jyrki Kallio and Katri Pynnöniemi Helsinki Finnish Institute of International Affairs June 2018 74 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier FIIA report 56 This report analyzes and compares the security strategies of four major international actors: the United States, China, Russia and the European Union. The rules-based liberal international order is increasingly under strain due to tightening geopolitical competition and the decline of the Western hegemony. In this context, the report explores the conceptions of the four major powers with regard to the world order, the self-defined position of each actor in it, and their possible aspirations to change the existing order. Furthermore, the report analyzes how each strategy defines security threats and risks, as well as ways to address these threats.The report highlights the ongoing rapid change of global structures and instruments of power as a challenge addressed in all four strategies. Increased competition is visible not only in the field of military power, but also in economic relations and at the level of values. While the US strategy defines Russia and China as key adversaries whose increasing influence is to be contained, both Russia and China correspondingly aim at building a counterweight to the US power in a multipolar world. Among the four actors, only the EU maintains a strong commitment to the rules-based order and explicitly rejects a worldview centred around zero-sum rivalry between great powers. Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd rswk-swf China (DE-588)4009937-4 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd rswk-swf Russia (Federation) / Military policy China / Military policy United States / Military policy European Union countries / Military policy Russia (Federation) / Security Strategy China / Security Strategy United States / Security Strategy European Union countries / Security Strategy Military policy China Europe / European Union countries Russia (Federation) United States USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g China (DE-588)4009937-4 g Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 g Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 s DE-604 Aaltola, Mika 1969- Verfasser (DE-588)1150186895 aut Kallio, Jyrki 1965- Verfasser (DE-588)1139391267 aut Pynnöniemi, Katri Verfasser (DE-588)1191222012 aut Ulkopoliittinen Instituutti (Helsinki) (DE-588)5097855-X isb Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-951-769-570-1 https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/the-security-strategies-of-the-us-china-russia-and-the-eu Verlag kostenfrei Volltext Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031442805&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Raik, Kristi 1975- Aaltola, Mika 1969- Kallio, Jyrki 1965- Pynnöniemi, Katri The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU living in different worlds Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4116489-1 (DE-588)4009937-4 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)4076899-5 |
| title | The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU living in different worlds |
| title_auth | The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU living in different worlds |
| title_exact_search | The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU living in different worlds |
| title_full | The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU living in different worlds Kristi Raik, Mika Aaltola, Jyrki Kallio and Katri Pynnöniemi |
| title_fullStr | The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU living in different worlds Kristi Raik, Mika Aaltola, Jyrki Kallio and Katri Pynnöniemi |
| title_full_unstemmed | The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU living in different worlds Kristi Raik, Mika Aaltola, Jyrki Kallio and Katri Pynnöniemi |
| title_short | The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU |
| title_sort | the security strategies of the us china russia and the eu living in different worlds |
| title_sub | living in different worlds |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Sicherheitspolitik China USA Russland |
| url | https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/the-security-strategies-of-the-us-china-russia-and-the-eu http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031442805&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT raikkristi thesecuritystrategiesoftheuschinarussiaandtheeulivingindifferentworlds AT aaltolamika thesecuritystrategiesoftheuschinarussiaandtheeulivingindifferentworlds AT kalliojyrki thesecuritystrategiesoftheuschinarussiaandtheeulivingindifferentworlds AT pynnoniemikatri thesecuritystrategiesoftheuschinarussiaandtheeulivingindifferentworlds AT ulkopoliittineninstituuttihelsinki thesecuritystrategiesoftheuschinarussiaandtheeulivingindifferentworlds |