The Fate of Knowledge:
Helen Longino seeks to break the current deadlock in the ongoing wars between philosophers of science and sociologists of science--academic battles founded on disagreement about the role of social forces in constructing scientific knowledge. While many philosophers of science downplay social forces,...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton, NJ
Princeton University Press
[2018]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 DE-1046 DE-1043 DE-858 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
Zusammenfassung: | Helen Longino seeks to break the current deadlock in the ongoing wars between philosophers of science and sociologists of science--academic battles founded on disagreement about the role of social forces in constructing scientific knowledge. While many philosophers of science downplay social forces, claiming that scientific knowledge is best considered as a product of cognitive processes, sociologists tend to argue that numerous noncognitive factors influence what scientists learn, how they package it, and how readily it is accepted. Underlying this disagreement, however, is a common assumption that social forces are a source of bias and irrationality. Longino challenges this assumption, arguing that social interaction actually assists us in securing firm, rationally based knowledge. This important insight allows her to develop a durable and novel account of scientific knowledge that integrates the social and cognitive. Longino begins with a detailed discussion of a wide range of contemporary thinkers who write on scientific knowledge, clarifying the philosophical points at issue. She then critically analyzes the dichotomous understanding of the rational and the social that characterizes both sides of the science studies stalemate and the social account that she sees as necessary for an epistemology of science that includes the full spectrum of cognitive processes. Throughout, her account is responsive both to the normative uses of the term knowledge and to the social conditions in which scientific knowledge is produced. Building on ideas first advanced in her influential book Science as Social Knowledge, Longino brings her account into dialogue with current work in social epistemology and science studies and shows how her critical social approach can help solve a variety of stubborn problems. While the book focuses on epistemological concerns related to the sociality of inquiry, Longino also takes up its implications for scientific pluralism. The social approach, she concludes, best allows us to retain a meaningful concept of knowledge in the face of theoretical plurality and uncertainty |
Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Nov 2018) |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
ISBN: | 9780691187013 |
DOI: | 10.1515/9780691187013 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV045878934 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190515s2018 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780691187013 |9 978-0-691-18701-3 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9780691187013 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9780691187013 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1101919823 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045878934 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-859 |a DE-860 |a DE-739 |a DE-473 |a DE-1046 |a DE-1043 |a DE-858 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 121 |2 21 | |
100 | 1 | |a Longino, Helen E. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Fate of Knowledge |c Helen E. Longino |
264 | 1 | |a Princeton, NJ |b Princeton University Press |c [2018] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2002 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Nov 2018) | ||
520 | |a Helen Longino seeks to break the current deadlock in the ongoing wars between philosophers of science and sociologists of science--academic battles founded on disagreement about the role of social forces in constructing scientific knowledge. While many philosophers of science downplay social forces, claiming that scientific knowledge is best considered as a product of cognitive processes, sociologists tend to argue that numerous noncognitive factors influence what scientists learn, how they package it, and how readily it is accepted. Underlying this disagreement, however, is a common assumption that social forces are a source of bias and irrationality. Longino challenges this assumption, arguing that social interaction actually assists us in securing firm, rationally based knowledge. This important insight allows her to develop a durable and novel account of scientific knowledge that integrates the social and cognitive. | ||
520 | |a Longino begins with a detailed discussion of a wide range of contemporary thinkers who write on scientific knowledge, clarifying the philosophical points at issue. She then critically analyzes the dichotomous understanding of the rational and the social that characterizes both sides of the science studies stalemate and the social account that she sees as necessary for an epistemology of science that includes the full spectrum of cognitive processes. Throughout, her account is responsive both to the normative uses of the term knowledge and to the social conditions in which scientific knowledge is produced. Building on ideas first advanced in her influential book Science as Social Knowledge, Longino brings her account into dialogue with current work in social epistemology and science studies and shows how her critical social approach can help solve a variety of stubborn problems. | ||
520 | |a While the book focuses on epistemological concerns related to the sociality of inquiry, Longino also takes up its implications for scientific pluralism. The social approach, she concludes, best allows us to retain a meaningful concept of knowledge in the face of theoretical plurality and uncertainty | ||
546 | |a In English | ||
650 | 4 | |a Knowledge, Sociology of | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissenssoziologie |0 (DE-588)4066615-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Erkenntnistheorie |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Erkenntnistheorie |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Wissenssoziologie |0 (DE-588)4066615-3 |D s |
689 | 1 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031262111 | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-859 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-860 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-739 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-473 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-1046 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-1043 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-858 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1824507436671696896 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Longino, Helen E. |
author_facet | Longino, Helen E. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Longino, Helen E. |
author_variant | h e l he hel |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV045878934 |
collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9780691187013 (OCoLC)1101919823 (DE-599)BVBBV045878934 |
dewey-full | 121 |
dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-ones | 121 - Epistemology (Theory of knowledge) |
dewey-raw | 121 |
dewey-search | 121 |
dewey-sort | 3121 |
dewey-tens | 120 - Epistemology, causation, humankind |
discipline | Philosophie |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/9780691187013 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045878934</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190515s2018 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780691187013</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-691-18701-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9780691187013</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9780691187013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1101919823</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045878934</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">121</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Longino, Helen E.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Fate of Knowledge</subfield><subfield code="c">Helen E. Longino</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton, NJ</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2018]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Nov 2018)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Helen Longino seeks to break the current deadlock in the ongoing wars between philosophers of science and sociologists of science--academic battles founded on disagreement about the role of social forces in constructing scientific knowledge. While many philosophers of science downplay social forces, claiming that scientific knowledge is best considered as a product of cognitive processes, sociologists tend to argue that numerous noncognitive factors influence what scientists learn, how they package it, and how readily it is accepted. Underlying this disagreement, however, is a common assumption that social forces are a source of bias and irrationality. Longino challenges this assumption, arguing that social interaction actually assists us in securing firm, rationally based knowledge. This important insight allows her to develop a durable and novel account of scientific knowledge that integrates the social and cognitive.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Longino begins with a detailed discussion of a wide range of contemporary thinkers who write on scientific knowledge, clarifying the philosophical points at issue. She then critically analyzes the dichotomous understanding of the rational and the social that characterizes both sides of the science studies stalemate and the social account that she sees as necessary for an epistemology of science that includes the full spectrum of cognitive processes. Throughout, her account is responsive both to the normative uses of the term knowledge and to the social conditions in which scientific knowledge is produced. Building on ideas first advanced in her influential book Science as Social Knowledge, Longino brings her account into dialogue with current work in social epistemology and science studies and shows how her critical social approach can help solve a variety of stubborn problems.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">While the book focuses on epistemological concerns related to the sociality of inquiry, Longino also takes up its implications for scientific pluralism. The social approach, she concludes, best allows us to retain a meaningful concept of knowledge in the face of theoretical plurality and uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Knowledge, Sociology of</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenssoziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066615-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Wissenssoziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066615-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031262111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV045878934 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2025-02-19T17:24:42Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780691187013 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031262111 |
oclc_num | 1101919823 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-1046 DE-1043 DE-858 |
owner_facet | DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-1046 DE-1043 DE-858 |
physical | 1 online resource |
psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG |
publishDate | 2018 |
publishDateSearch | 2018 |
publishDateSort | 2018 |
publisher | Princeton University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Longino, Helen E. Verfasser aut The Fate of Knowledge Helen E. Longino Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press [2018] © 2002 1 online resource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Nov 2018) Helen Longino seeks to break the current deadlock in the ongoing wars between philosophers of science and sociologists of science--academic battles founded on disagreement about the role of social forces in constructing scientific knowledge. While many philosophers of science downplay social forces, claiming that scientific knowledge is best considered as a product of cognitive processes, sociologists tend to argue that numerous noncognitive factors influence what scientists learn, how they package it, and how readily it is accepted. Underlying this disagreement, however, is a common assumption that social forces are a source of bias and irrationality. Longino challenges this assumption, arguing that social interaction actually assists us in securing firm, rationally based knowledge. This important insight allows her to develop a durable and novel account of scientific knowledge that integrates the social and cognitive. Longino begins with a detailed discussion of a wide range of contemporary thinkers who write on scientific knowledge, clarifying the philosophical points at issue. She then critically analyzes the dichotomous understanding of the rational and the social that characterizes both sides of the science studies stalemate and the social account that she sees as necessary for an epistemology of science that includes the full spectrum of cognitive processes. Throughout, her account is responsive both to the normative uses of the term knowledge and to the social conditions in which scientific knowledge is produced. Building on ideas first advanced in her influential book Science as Social Knowledge, Longino brings her account into dialogue with current work in social epistemology and science studies and shows how her critical social approach can help solve a variety of stubborn problems. While the book focuses on epistemological concerns related to the sociality of inquiry, Longino also takes up its implications for scientific pluralism. The social approach, she concludes, best allows us to retain a meaningful concept of knowledge in the face of theoretical plurality and uncertainty In English Knowledge, Sociology of Wissenssoziologie (DE-588)4066615-3 gnd rswk-swf Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd rswk-swf Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 s 1\p DE-604 Wissenssoziologie (DE-588)4066615-3 s 2\p DE-604 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Longino, Helen E. The Fate of Knowledge Knowledge, Sociology of Wissenssoziologie (DE-588)4066615-3 gnd Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4066615-3 (DE-588)4070914-0 |
title | The Fate of Knowledge |
title_auth | The Fate of Knowledge |
title_exact_search | The Fate of Knowledge |
title_full | The Fate of Knowledge Helen E. Longino |
title_fullStr | The Fate of Knowledge Helen E. Longino |
title_full_unstemmed | The Fate of Knowledge Helen E. Longino |
title_short | The Fate of Knowledge |
title_sort | the fate of knowledge |
topic | Knowledge, Sociology of Wissenssoziologie (DE-588)4066615-3 gnd Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd |
topic_facet | Knowledge, Sociology of Wissenssoziologie Erkenntnistheorie |
url | https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longinohelene thefateofknowledge |