Comparative concepts of criminal law:
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Chicago
Intersentia
[2019]
|
| Ausgabe: | 3nd edition |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext |
| Beschreibung: | xviii, 376 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781780686851 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045534269 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190812 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 190329s2019 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781780686851 |c Paperback: GBP 85.00, EUR 99.15 (DE) |9 978-1-78068-685-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1098188263 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045534269 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-188 |a DE-19 |a DE-739 | ||
| 084 | |a PH 6040 |0 (DE-625)136213: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative concepts of criminal law |c edited by Johannes Keiler, David Roef |
| 250 | |a 3nd edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Chicago |b Intersentia |c [2019] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2019 | |
| 300 | |a xviii, 376 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtssystem |0 (DE-588)4139924-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strafrecht |0 (DE-588)4057795-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Niederlande |0 (DE-588)4042203-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a England |0 (DE-588)4014770-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a England |0 (DE-588)4014770-8 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Strafrecht |0 (DE-588)4057795-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtssystem |0 (DE-588)4139924-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Niederlande |0 (DE-588)4042203-3 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Keiler, Johannes |d 1978- |0 (DE-588)1035214598 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Roef, David |d 1970- |0 (DE-588)1117115143 |4 edt | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030918316&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030918316&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030918316 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804179495159070720 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS Preface................................................................................................................... v List ofAbbreviations....................................................................................... xvii Introduction Johannes Keiler and David Roef.......................................................................... 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The general purpose of the book................................................................ 1 A comparative approach............................................................................. 2 The three penal systems.................................................................................4 The changing contours of criminal !aw..................................................... 6 The structure of the book........................................................................... 7 Chapter I. Theories of Punishment Jacques Claessen...................................................................................................... П 1. 2. 3. 4. Introduction............................................................................................. 11 The concept of punishment....................................................................... 13 The influence of the Enlightenment on theories of punishment............. 16 3.1. Philosophy of criminal law during the Enlightenment.................... 16 3.2. Enlightenment views on mankind and the world........................... 17 3.3. The Enlightenment as a dialectic process........................................ 18 Different
theories of punishment.............................................................. 19 4.1. Retributive theories of punishment................................................. 19 4.1.1. Who should be punished?..................................................... 19 4.1.2. Why should one be punished?..................................................20 4.1.3. How severely should one be punished?.................................20 4.1.4. Possible criticism of retributive theories of punishment....... 21 4.2. Utilitarian or consequentialist theories of punishment.................. 22 4.2.1. Who should be punished?....................................................... 22 4.2.2. Why should one be punished?............................................... 23 4.2.3. How severely should one be punished?.................................23 4.2.4. Possible criticism of utilitarian theories of punishment....... 24 4.3. Hybrid or mixed theories of punishment........................................ 25 4.3.1. Two types of mixed theories................................................. 25 4.3.2. Possible criticism of mixed theories.........................................25 Inte.rsentia vii
Contents 5. 6. Goals of punishment in criminal politics: World War II onwards......... 26 5.1. Penal welfarism: focus on resocialisation and re-integration of offenders (1945-1975)................................................................... 26 5.2. ‘Nothing works’ and the re-invention of retribution and the prison (1975-1985)..................................................................... 27 5.3. Crime fighting, risk management and ‘negative’ prevention (1985-2001)........................................................................................ 28 5.4. Criminal law as a primary instrument of security politics (2001-present).................................................................................... 29 5.5. The return of the victim in criminal law and the revival of restorative justice........................................................................... 31 Concluding remarks.................................................................................... 34 Chapter II. Principles of Criminalisation and the Limits of Criminal Law Johannes Keiler and David Roef............................................................ 35 1. 2. 11. Introduction............................................................................................. 35 Criminalisation and shifting criminal policies........................................ 37 2.1. From welfare state to risk society..................................................... 37 2.2. From penal welfarism to a culture of control................................... 39 2.3. Some consequences for
criminalisation.............................................. 42 The principle of individual autonomy.........................................................44 The principle of welfare...............................................................................46 The harm principle...................................................................................... 48 5.1. An exclusionist versus an inclusionist version of the harm principle............................................................................................... 49 5.2. Harm prevention versus harmful conduct...................................... 52 5.3. What counts as harm?..........................................................................54 5.4. The role of wrongfulness.................................................................. 55 5.5. Public wrongs...................................................................................... 58 Criminalising violations of morality: legalmoralism................................ 60 Criminalising remote harms......................................................................63 Protecting legal goods (Rechtsgüter)...........................................................66 8.1. The conceptual difference from the harm principle............................67 8.2. The goals and function of the doctrine of legal goods........................ 68 8.3. Problems of the theory of legal goods................................................69 Criminalisation and human rights.......................................................... 74 The ultima ratio
principle: criminalisationas the last resort................... 76 10.1. Why should criminal law be the last resort?.................................... 77 10.2. Ultima ratio and the functions of criminal law............................... 80 Concluding remarks.................................................................................. 82 viii Intersentia 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Contents Chapter III. The Principle of Legality Christina Peristeridou........................................................................... 85 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Introduction............................................................................................. 85 The four aspects of the legality principle................................................. 86 2.1. Lex scripta...........................................................................................86 2.2. Lex certa...............................................................................................87 2.3. Lex stricta............................................................................................. 87 2.4. Lex praevia...........................................................................................88 The rationale of the principle of legality................................................... 89 3.1. Historical roots.................................................................................. 89 3.2. Individual liberty, autonomy and human dignity..............................90 3.3. Rule of Law....................................................................................... 91 3.4. Separation of powers........................................................................... 92 The legality principle in the national systems.......................................... 93 4.1. A comparative view of the legality principle.................................... 93 4.1.1. The traditional difference....................................................... 93 4.1.2. A
convergence of traditions?................................................... 94 4.1.3. Application of lex certa............................................................. 96 4.2. The influence of the ECtHR on national systems............................... 97 Modern challenges: two judgments............................................................ 99 5.1. The German Constitutional Court and the definition of coercion....................................................................................... 99 5.2. The ECtHR and the definition of rape............................................ 101 5.3. What we can learn from both cases: a comparative analysis......... 102 Concluding remarks................................................................................ 104 Chapter IV. Actus Reus and Mens Rea: The Elements of Crime and the Framework of Criminal Liability Johannes Keiler...................................................................................... 107 1. 2. 3. 4. Introduction........................................................................................... Actus reus and mens rea......................................................................... 2.1. Actus reus........................................................................................ 2.2. Mens rea......................................................................................... The framework of criminal liability: the bipartite and tripartite system...................................................................................................... Concluding
remarks................................................................................ 107 109 109 112 114 119 Chapter V. Commission versus Omission Johannes Keiler ..................................................................................... 121 1. Introduction............................................................................................. 121 Intersentia IX
Contents 2. 3. 4. Offences of commission: the theory of conduct and the baseline of criminal liability.................................................................................. 2.1. Different theories of conduct.......................................................... 2.1.1. The causal theory of action, or the ghost in the machine................................................................................ 2.1.2. The teleological theory of action: human conduct is ‘seeing’, not blind.............................................................. 2.1.3. The social theory of action: the context in which the act occurs is significant.............................................................. 2.2. The conduct requirement in practice............................................. 2.2.1. Loss of physical control......................................................... 2.2.2. Impaired consciousness....................................................... 2.2.3. The pitfalls of the conduct requirement............................... 2.3. Concluding remarks regarding the conduct requirement............. Omission liability.................................................................................... 3.1. Introduction.................................................................................... 3.2. Statutory duties of care (or proper crimes of omission)................ 3.3. Commission by omission (or improper crimes of omission)......... 3.3.1. Duties of care in modern criminal law................................. 3.3.2. Commission by omission: a short
comparative overview .... 3.3.2.1. England.................................................................... 3.3.2.2. The Netherlands....................................................... 3.3.2.3. Germany.................................................................. 3.3.3. The different categories of duties of care............................. 3.3.3.1. Duties based on a special relationship to the victim............................................................ 3.3.3.2. Undertaken duties............................. 3.3.3.3. Duties based on specific qualities of the offender.... 3.3.3.4. Duties based on ownership of or responsibility for a source of danger.............................................. 3.3.3.5. Duties based on the creation of a dangerous situation.................................................................... Concluding remarks................................................................................ 121 122 122 124 124 125 127 129 130 132 133 133 134 135 136 138 138 139 139 140 140 143 145 148 150 151 Chapter VI. Causation Johannes Keiler...................................................................................... 153 1. 2. 3. Introduction........................................................................................... 153 The field of application of causation....................................................... 154 Approaches to causation......................................................................... 155 3.1. The conditio sine qua non................................................................... 156
3.2. The theory of proximate cause......................................................... 157 3.3. The theory of adequate causation................................................... 158 x Intersentia
Contents 4. 5. 3.4. Other factors bearing on causation................................................. 3.4.1. The role of the underlying offence........................................ 3.4.2. The role of criminal policy and blameworthiness.............. Causality compared................................................................................ 4.1. Contributory causes....................................................................... 4.2. Intervening causes........................................................................... 4.2.1. Naturally occurring interventions...................................... 4.2.2. Conduct of the victim breaking the chain of causation .... 4.2.3. Medical interventions.......................................................... 4.3. Causal uncertainties in the modern risk society........................... Concluding remarks................................................................................ 158 159 159 160 160 164 164 165 170 172 175 Chapter VII. Forms and Aspects of Mens Rea Jeroen Blomsma and David Roef.......................................................... 177 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introduction........................................................................................... 177 Different fault elements compared.......................................................... 178 2.1. Direct intent or dolus directus......................................................... 179 2.2. Indirect intent or dolus indirectus................................................. 180 2.3. Conditional intent or dolus
eventualis............................................ 182 2.3.1. Meaning and rationale......................................................... 182 2.3.2. Awareness of a risk................................................................ 183 2.3.3. Acceptance of the risk.......................................................... 186 2.4. Recklessness.................................................................................... 189 2.4.1. A subjective test................................................................... 190 2.4.1.1. Caldwell recklessness............................................... 190 2.4.1.2. R v G recklessness..................................................... 191 2.4.2. An unreasonable risk............................................................ 192 2.4.3. Recklessness in HIV cases................................................... 193 2.5. Negligence or culpa......................................................................... 195 2.5.1. Conscious negligence.......................................................... 196 2.5.2. Unconscious negligence....................................................... 197 Demarcation from premeditation and motive.......................................... 200 Strict liability............................................................................................. 202 Concluding remarks.................................................................................. 204 Chapter VIII. Justifications and Excuses Jeroen Blomsma and David
Roef............................................................ 207 1. 2. Introduction............................................................................................. 207 Rationale of the dichotomy....................................................................... 208 2.1. Communicative difference................................................................ 208 2.2. Personal and universal application................................................... 209 Intersentia ХІ
Contents 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. xii Self-defence................................................................................................... 210 3.1. Rationales............................................................................................. 210 3.2. Criteria................................................................................................... 211 3.2.1. Interrelationship of the criteria............................................... 212 3.2.2. Wrongful and imminent attack............................................... 212 3.2.3. Legitimate interests.................................................................. 214 3.2.4. Necessity.................................................................................... 215 3.2.5. Proportionality.......................................................................... 216 3.2.6. The‘reasonableness’requirement in England....................... 218 Self-defence-excess..........................................................................................221 4.1. Intensive and extensive excess.............................................................. 222 4.2. State of mind caused by the attack.......................................................223 4.3. Partial defences in England.................................................................. 224 4.3.1. Loss of control............................................................................ 224 4.3.2. Diminished responsibility.........................................................225
Necessity.........................................................................................................226 5.1. Rationale and history............................................................................ 227 5.2. Criteria..................................................................................................... 228 5.2.1. Imminent danger of legitimate interest................................... 228 5.2.2. Subsidiarity..................................................................................230 5.2.3. Proportionality.......................................................................... 231 Duress...............................................................................................................234 6.1. Rationale................................................................................................. 235 6.2. Criteria..................................................................................................... 235 6.2.1. Legitimate interests.................................................................... 236 6.2.2. Imminent danger........................................................................ 236 6.2.3. Subsidiarity.................................................................................. 237 6.2.4. Proportionality............................................................................ 238 Insanity........................................................................................................... 240 7.1.
Rationale................................................................................................. 240 7.2. Criteria..................................................................................................... 241 7.2.1. Mental disorder.......................................................................... 241 7.2.2. Impaired capacities.................................................................... 243 7.2.3. Attribution and prior fault........................................................ 244 7.3. Diminished capacity..............................................................................245 Intoxication..................................................................................................... 246 8.1. Effects on fault (mens rea).................................................................... 246 8.2. Intoxication as an excuse...................................................................... 248 Concluding remarks........................................................................................250 Intersentia
Contents Chapter IX. Inchoate Offences: Attempt and Preparation Johannes Keiler and David Roef.......................................................... 253 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introduction............................................................................................. 253 Two patterns of criminality: two ways of looking at inchoate offences...................................................................................................... 254 Preparation............................................................................................... 255 3.1. Attempt versus preparation.............................................................. 255 3.2. Offences criminalising specific preparatory conduct...................... 256 3.3. Conspiracy........................................................................................256 3.4. The Serious Crime Act 2007............................................................ 257 3.5. Preparation as a general doctrine: the Dutch example.................. 258 3.5.1. The history and rationale of Article 46DCC........................... 258 3.5.2. The actus reus of preparatory acts.......................................... 259 3.5.3. The mens rea of preparatory acts............................................ 263 Attempt.....................................................................................................263 4.1. Introduction......................................................................................263 4.2. Different rationales for punishing attempts.....................................264
4.3. An overview of the legal provisions on attempt............................... 265 4.3.1. Germany................................................................................ 265 4.3.2. The Netherlands..................................................................... 266 4.3.3. England and Wales................................................................ 267 4.4. The actus reus of attempt: drawing the line between attempt and preparation.................................................................................267 4.4.1. The German approach............................................................ 267 4.4.2. The Dutch approach.............................................................. 269 4.4.3. The English approach............................................................ 270 4.5. The mens rea of attempt....................................................................272 4.5.1. The fault element in theNetherlands and Germany............272 4.5.2. The English fault element....................................................... 273 4.6. Impossible attempts......................................................................... 274 4.6.1. Impossibility in the Netherlands: an objective approach ... 275 4.6.2. Impossibility in England and Wales: a subjective approach.................................................................................275 4.6.3. Impossibility in Germany: a mixed approach........................ 277 4.7. Voluntary withdrawal........................................................................278 4.7.1. The common law
versus civil law approach............................278 4.7.2. Preconditions for withdrawal: the need for an (in)complete attempt................................................... 279 4.7.3. The voluntariness requirement.............................................. 281 Concluding remarks.................................................. ..............................283 Intersentia xiii
Contents Chapter X. Forms of Participation Johannes Keiler........................................................................................ 285 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. xiv Introduction............................................................................................. 285 Terminology and some conceptual challenges........................................ 287 2.1. Terminology...................................................................................... 287 2.2. The equivalence of perpetrators and accomplices............................287 2.3. The derivative nature of complicity..................................................288 2.4. Mens rea and deviations from the original plan............................... 290 Participation in Germany......................................................................... 290 3.1. Introduction...................................................................................... 290 3.2. Distinguishing perpetrators from accomplices............................... 292 3.3. Direct perpetration........................................................................... 293 3.4. Perpetration by means......................................................................293 3.5. Co-perpetration.................................................................................295 3.5.1. General requirements............................................................ 295 3.5.2. Deviation from the common plan.......................................... 296 3.6. Forms of complicity: instigation and
aiding.....................................298 3.6.1. General requirements............................................................ 298 3.6.2. Instigation...............................................................................299 3.6.3. Aiding.................................................................................... 301 Participation in the Netherlands.............................................................. 302 4.1. Introduction...................................................................................... 302 4.2. Direct perpetration: from a restrictive to a functional approach............................................................................................303 4.3. Co-perpetration.................................................................................305 4.3.1. Conscious, complete and close cooperation..........................305 4.3.2. Is physical presence necessary?..............................................306 4.3.3. Is physical presence sufficient?................................................307 4.3.4. The Supreme Court gives an overview...................................309 4.3.5. Deviation from the common plan........................................ 310 4.4. Perpetration by means.................................................................... 312 4.5. Instigation........................................................................................ 312 4.5.1. Means of instigation............................................................ 313 4.5.2. Mens rea of
instigation......................................................... 314 4.5.3. Deviation from the instigator’s plan.................................... 314 4.5.4. Attempt to instigate.............................................................. 314 4.6. Aiding............................................................................................. 315 Participation in England and Wales....................................................... 317 5.1. Introduction.................................................................................... 317 5.2. Perpetration.................................................................................... 317 5.3. Perpetration through innocent agency.......................................... 318 5.4. Accomplice liability......................................................................... 319 Intersentia
Contents 6. 5.4.1. The actus reus of accomplice liability................................... 319 5.4.1.1. Aiding..................................................................... 319 5.4.1.2. Abetting......................................................................320 5.4.1.3. Counselling.............................................................. 321 5.4.1.4. Procuring.................................................................. 321 5.4.2. The mens rea of accomplice liability.................................... 322 5.4.3. The rise and fall of parasitic accessorial liability/ the doctrine of joint criminal enterprise............................. 325 Concluding remarks...........՛....................................................................328 Chapter XL Corporate Criminal Liability David Roep............................................................................................... 333 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Introduction........................................................................................... 333 Approaches to corporate wrongdoing: a conceptual overview.............. 335 2.1. The nominalist approach.................................................................. 336 2.2. The organisational approach.......................................................... 337 2.3. The alternative approach of administrative liability...................... 339 2.4. Concurring liability of individuals................................................. 340 Corporate liability in England and Wales..............................................341 3.1. The
doctrine of vicarious liability..................................................... 342 3.2. Qualified vicarious liability: the Bribery Act 2010 and the Criminal Finance Act 2017 ............................................... 344 3.3. The identification doctrine................................................................ 346 3.3.1. The directing mind and will................................................. 347 3.3.2. Shortcomings of the identificationdoctrine........................... 349 3.4. The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007........................................................................................... 352 3.4.1. The relevant duty of care....................................................... 353 3.4.2. The role of senior management..............................................354 Corporate liability in the Netherlands................................................... 357 4.1. Corporate (and individual) liability pursuant to Article 51 DCC............................................................................. 357 4.2. The attribution criteria developed by the Supreme Court...............359 4.3. Attribution of mens rea to corporations........................................ 363 Administrative corporate liability in Germany.........................................365 5.1. Corporate liability according to §30 of the Administrative Offences Act...................................................................................... 365 5.2. Breach of a duty to take supervisory measures...............................368
Corporate liability in European legal instruments................................. 370 Concluding remarks.................................................................................. 372 About the Authors...............................................................................................375 Intersentia XV
Comparative Concepts of Criminal Law is unique in the sense that it introduces the reader to the fundamental concepts and rules of substantive criminal law in a comparative way and not just to the criminal law system of one specific jurisdiction. Compared with other fields of law, like contract and property law, comparative research into the so-called general part of criminal law is quite a recent phenomenon within academia. The increasing ‘Europeanisation’ of criminal law and policy makes such a comparative approach even more necessary. This handbook therefore fills a legal educational gap by exploring basic concepts of substantive criminal law in three major European legal systems: the common law system of England and Wales and the civil law systems of Germany and the Netherlands. Each chapter focuses on a specific concept or doctrine that is necessary to determine criminal liability (e.g. actus reus, mens rea, defences, inchoate offences). Throughout the book the authors also highlight and discuss some recent legislative and judicial developments that broaden the scope of criminal liability in our modern culture of control. This book is not only invaluable for students, but also for legal practitioners who want to broaden their knowledge of criminal law.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author2 | Keiler, Johannes 1978- Roef, David 1970- |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | j k jk d r dr |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1035214598 (DE-588)1117115143 |
| author_facet | Keiler, Johannes 1978- Roef, David 1970- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045534269 |
| classification_rvk | PH 6040 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1098188263 (DE-599)BVBBV045534269 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 3nd edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02225nam a2200481 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045534269</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190812 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190329s2019 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781780686851</subfield><subfield code="c">Paperback: GBP 85.00, EUR 99.15 (DE)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-78068-685-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1098188263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045534269</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 6040</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136213:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative concepts of criminal law</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Johannes Keiler, David Roef</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3nd edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Chicago</subfield><subfield code="b">Intersentia</subfield><subfield code="c">[2019]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xviii, 376 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtssystem</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139924-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057795-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Niederlande</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4042203-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">England</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014770-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">England</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014770-8</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Strafrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057795-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtssystem</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139924-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Niederlande</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4042203-3</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keiler, Johannes</subfield><subfield code="d">1978-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1035214598</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roef, David</subfield><subfield code="d">1970-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1117115143</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030918316&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030918316&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030918316</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd Niederlande (DE-588)4042203-3 gnd England (DE-588)4014770-8 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Deutschland Niederlande England |
| id | DE-604.BV045534269 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:20:46Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781780686851 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030918316 |
| oclc_num | 1098188263 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-188 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-188 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-739 |
| physical | xviii, 376 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Intersentia |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Comparative concepts of criminal law edited by Johannes Keiler, David Roef 3nd edition Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Chicago Intersentia [2019] © 2019 xviii, 376 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Rechtssystem (DE-588)4139924-9 gnd rswk-swf Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd rswk-swf Niederlande (DE-588)4042203-3 gnd rswk-swf England (DE-588)4014770-8 gnd rswk-swf England (DE-588)4014770-8 g Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 s Rechtssystem (DE-588)4139924-9 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 g Niederlande (DE-588)4042203-3 g DE-604 Keiler, Johannes 1978- (DE-588)1035214598 edt Roef, David 1970- (DE-588)1117115143 edt Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030918316&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030918316&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext |
| spellingShingle | Comparative concepts of criminal law Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Rechtssystem (DE-588)4139924-9 gnd Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4139924-9 (DE-588)4057795-8 (DE-588)4011882-4 (DE-588)4042203-3 (DE-588)4014770-8 |
| title | Comparative concepts of criminal law |
| title_auth | Comparative concepts of criminal law |
| title_exact_search | Comparative concepts of criminal law |
| title_full | Comparative concepts of criminal law edited by Johannes Keiler, David Roef |
| title_fullStr | Comparative concepts of criminal law edited by Johannes Keiler, David Roef |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative concepts of criminal law edited by Johannes Keiler, David Roef |
| title_short | Comparative concepts of criminal law |
| title_sort | comparative concepts of criminal law |
| topic | Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Rechtssystem (DE-588)4139924-9 gnd Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Rechtsvergleich Rechtssystem Strafrecht Deutschland Niederlande England |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030918316&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030918316&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT keilerjohannes comparativeconceptsofcriminallaw AT roefdavid comparativeconceptsofcriminallaw |