The myth of coequal branches: restoring the constitution's separation of functions
"The idea that the three branches of U.S. government are equal in power is taught in classrooms, proclaimed by politicians, and referenced in the media. But, as David Siemers shows, that idea is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers explains how adherence to thi...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Columbia, Missouri
University of Missouri
[2018]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Studies in constitutional democracy
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | "The idea that the three branches of U.S. government are equal in power is taught in classrooms, proclaimed by politicians, and referenced in the media. But, as David Siemers shows, that idea is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers explains how adherence to this myth normalizes a politics of gridlock, in which the action of any branch can be checked by the reaction of any other. The Founders, however, envisioned a separation of functions rather than a separation of powers. Siemers argues that this view needs to replace our current view, so that the goals set out in the Constitution's Preamble may be better achieved"... "The idea that the United States has three coequal branches of government is taught in classrooms across the nation, is frequently proclaimed by politicians, and is referenced uncritically in the media. But what does it mean? How does it square with the Federalist's proclamations that "in Republican government the legislative authority, necessarily, predominates" and "the judiciary is beyond compare the weakest of the three departments of power"? In this work, David Siemers argues that the idea of three branches equal in power is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers invites us to consider this myth more deeply and to consider whether its perpetuation is beneficial or harmful"... |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Beschreibung: | xv, 227 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9780826221698 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045391495 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190201 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 190109s2018 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 018021227 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780826221698 |c hardback |9 978-0-8262-2169-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1083871884 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045391495 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a JK305 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 320.473/04 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Siemers, David J. |d 1968- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)142048313 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The myth of coequal branches |b restoring the constitution's separation of functions |c David J. Siemers |
| 264 | 1 | |a Columbia, Missouri |b University of Missouri |c [2018] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2018 | |
| 300 | |a xv, 227 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Studies in constitutional democracy | |
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 520 | |a "The idea that the three branches of U.S. government are equal in power is taught in classrooms, proclaimed by politicians, and referenced in the media. But, as David Siemers shows, that idea is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers explains how adherence to this myth normalizes a politics of gridlock, in which the action of any branch can be checked by the reaction of any other. The Founders, however, envisioned a separation of functions rather than a separation of powers. Siemers argues that this view needs to replace our current view, so that the goals set out in the Constitution's Preamble may be better achieved"... | ||
| 520 | |a "The idea that the United States has three coequal branches of government is taught in classrooms across the nation, is frequently proclaimed by politicians, and is referenced uncritically in the media. But what does it mean? How does it square with the Federalist's proclamations that "in Republican government the legislative authority, necessarily, predominates" and "the judiciary is beyond compare the weakest of the three departments of power"? In this work, David Siemers argues that the idea of three branches equal in power is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers invites us to consider this myth more deeply and to consider whether its perpetuation is beneficial or harmful"... | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General / bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Separation of powers |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional history |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gewaltenteilung |0 (DE-588)4071817-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Gewaltenteilung |0 (DE-588)4071817-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-0-8262-7421-2 |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030777768 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804179252162068480 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Siemers, David J. 1968- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)142048313 |
| author_facet | Siemers, David J. 1968- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Siemers, David J. 1968- |
| author_variant | d j s dj djs |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045391495 |
| callnumber-first | J - Political Science |
| callnumber-label | JK305 |
| callnumber-raw | JK305 |
| callnumber-search | JK305 |
| callnumber-sort | JK 3305 |
| callnumber-subject | JK - United States |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1083871884 (DE-599)BVBBV045391495 |
| dewey-full | 320.473/04 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
| dewey-raw | 320.473/04 |
| dewey-search | 320.473/04 |
| dewey-sort | 3320.473 14 |
| dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
| discipline | Politologie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03007nam a2200481 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045391495</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190201 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190109s2018 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">018021227</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780826221698</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8262-2169-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1083871884</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045391495</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JK305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">320.473/04</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Siemers, David J.</subfield><subfield code="d">1968-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)142048313</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The myth of coequal branches</subfield><subfield code="b">restoring the constitution's separation of functions</subfield><subfield code="c">David J. Siemers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Columbia, Missouri</subfield><subfield code="b">University of Missouri</subfield><subfield code="c">[2018]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xv, 227 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studies in constitutional democracy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The idea that the three branches of U.S. government are equal in power is taught in classrooms, proclaimed by politicians, and referenced in the media. But, as David Siemers shows, that idea is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers explains how adherence to this myth normalizes a politics of gridlock, in which the action of any branch can be checked by the reaction of any other. The Founders, however, envisioned a separation of functions rather than a separation of powers. Siemers argues that this view needs to replace our current view, so that the goals set out in the Constitution's Preamble may be better achieved"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The idea that the United States has three coequal branches of government is taught in classrooms across the nation, is frequently proclaimed by politicians, and is referenced uncritically in the media. But what does it mean? How does it square with the Federalist's proclamations that "in Republican government the legislative authority, necessarily, predominates" and "the judiciary is beyond compare the weakest of the three departments of power"? In this work, David Siemers argues that the idea of three branches equal in power is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers invites us to consider this myth more deeply and to consider whether its perpetuation is beneficial or harmful"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General / bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Separation of powers</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional history</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gewaltenteilung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071817-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gewaltenteilung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071817-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-8262-7421-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030777768</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV045391495 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:16:54Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780826221698 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 018021227 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030777768 |
| oclc_num | 1083871884 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | xv, 227 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | University of Missouri |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Studies in constitutional democracy |
| spelling | Siemers, David J. 1968- Verfasser (DE-588)142048313 aut The myth of coequal branches restoring the constitution's separation of functions David J. Siemers Columbia, Missouri University of Missouri [2018] © 2018 xv, 227 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Studies in constitutional democracy Includes bibliographical references and index "The idea that the three branches of U.S. government are equal in power is taught in classrooms, proclaimed by politicians, and referenced in the media. But, as David Siemers shows, that idea is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers explains how adherence to this myth normalizes a politics of gridlock, in which the action of any branch can be checked by the reaction of any other. The Founders, however, envisioned a separation of functions rather than a separation of powers. Siemers argues that this view needs to replace our current view, so that the goals set out in the Constitution's Preamble may be better achieved"... "The idea that the United States has three coequal branches of government is taught in classrooms across the nation, is frequently proclaimed by politicians, and is referenced uncritically in the media. But what does it mean? How does it square with the Federalist's proclamations that "in Republican government the legislative authority, necessarily, predominates" and "the judiciary is beyond compare the weakest of the three departments of power"? In this work, David Siemers argues that the idea of three branches equal in power is a myth, neither intended by the Founders nor true in practice. Siemers invites us to consider this myth more deeply and to consider whether its perpetuation is beneficial or harmful"... POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General / bisacsh Separation of powers United States Constitutional history United States POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General Gewaltenteilung (DE-588)4071817-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Gewaltenteilung (DE-588)4071817-7 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-0-8262-7421-2 |
| spellingShingle | Siemers, David J. 1968- The myth of coequal branches restoring the constitution's separation of functions POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General / bisacsh Separation of powers United States Constitutional history United States POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General Gewaltenteilung (DE-588)4071817-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4071817-7 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
| title | The myth of coequal branches restoring the constitution's separation of functions |
| title_auth | The myth of coequal branches restoring the constitution's separation of functions |
| title_exact_search | The myth of coequal branches restoring the constitution's separation of functions |
| title_full | The myth of coequal branches restoring the constitution's separation of functions David J. Siemers |
| title_fullStr | The myth of coequal branches restoring the constitution's separation of functions David J. Siemers |
| title_full_unstemmed | The myth of coequal branches restoring the constitution's separation of functions David J. Siemers |
| title_short | The myth of coequal branches |
| title_sort | the myth of coequal branches restoring the constitution s separation of functions |
| title_sub | restoring the constitution's separation of functions |
| topic | POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General / bisacsh Separation of powers United States Constitutional history United States POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General Gewaltenteilung (DE-588)4071817-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General / bisacsh Separation of powers United States Constitutional history United States POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General Gewaltenteilung USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT siemersdavidj themythofcoequalbranchesrestoringtheconstitutionsseparationoffunctions |