Aviation security: after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Santa Monica, Calif.]
Rand Corp.
2012
|
| Series: | Occasional paper (Rand Corporation)
OP-390 |
| Subjects: | |
| Item Description: | "RAND Homeland Security and Defense Center." Print version record |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (11, [1] pages) |
| ISBN: | 9780833077356 083307735X 9780833077363 0833077368 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045345051 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 181206s2012 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780833077356 |9 978-0-8330-7735-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 083307735X |9 0-8330-7735-X | ||
| 020 | |a 9780833077363 |9 978-0-8330-7736-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 0833077368 |9 0-8330-7736-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-4-ENC)ocn822979203 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)822979203 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045345051 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 363.28760973 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Jenkins, Brian Michael |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Aviation security |b after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review |c Brian Michael Jenkins |
| 264 | 1 | |a [Santa Monica, Calif.] |b Rand Corp. |c 2012 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (11, [1] pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Occasional paper (Rand Corporation) |v OP-390 | |
| 500 | |a "RAND Homeland Security and Defense Center." | ||
| 500 | |a Print version record | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a "Aviation security is costly, controversial, and contentious; no other security measures directly affect such a large portion of the country's population. Because of the nature of the threat, aviation security is the most intrusive form of security, pushing hard on the frontier of civil liberties. And the threat is real: Terrorists remain obsessed with attacking airplanes. At the same time, passenger loads are increasing, while security budgets are likely to decline. Performance suffers. Meanwhile, public tolerance and cooperation are beginning to fray. But the Transportation Security Administration is often blamed for things beyond its control. And post-catastrophe reviews can push us in the wrong direction, usually resulting in new security measures rather than a reexamination of strategy. After 40 years of focus on tactical measures, it is time for a sweeping review of aviation security. Instead of forming the usual federal commission to undertake this task, several non-government research institutions could be selected to independently design an optimal aviation security system, beginning not with the four decades of accumulated security measures currently in place but with a clean slate. The competing models would be reviewed and the best ideas or combination of ideas would be put forward. Even if the results turn out to resemble what is already in place, at least the process offers some comfort that we are pretty close to getting it right."--"Overview", p. [1] | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Law Enforcement |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a TRANSPORTATION / Aviation / General |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Industries / Transportation |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Aeronautics, Commercial / Security measures |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Aeronautics / Safety measures |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Airline passenger security screening |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Airports / Security measures |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Terrorism / Prevention |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Airports |x Security measures |z United States |a Airline passenger security screening |z United States |a Aeronautics, Commercial |x Security measures |z United States |a Aeronautics |x Safety measures |a Terrorism |x Prevention | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Rand Corporation |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 710 | 2 | |a RAND Homeland Security and Defense Center |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Jenkins, Brian Michael |t Aviation security |d [Santa Monica, Calif.] : Rand Corp., 2012 |z 9780833077028 |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-ENC | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030731754 | ||
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804179165424910336 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Jenkins, Brian Michael |
| author_facet | Jenkins, Brian Michael |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Jenkins, Brian Michael |
| author_variant | b m j bm bmj |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045345051 |
| collection | ZDB-4-ENC |
| contents | "Aviation security is costly, controversial, and contentious; no other security measures directly affect such a large portion of the country's population. Because of the nature of the threat, aviation security is the most intrusive form of security, pushing hard on the frontier of civil liberties. And the threat is real: Terrorists remain obsessed with attacking airplanes. At the same time, passenger loads are increasing, while security budgets are likely to decline. Performance suffers. Meanwhile, public tolerance and cooperation are beginning to fray. But the Transportation Security Administration is often blamed for things beyond its control. And post-catastrophe reviews can push us in the wrong direction, usually resulting in new security measures rather than a reexamination of strategy. After 40 years of focus on tactical measures, it is time for a sweeping review of aviation security. Instead of forming the usual federal commission to undertake this task, several non-government research institutions could be selected to independently design an optimal aviation security system, beginning not with the four decades of accumulated security measures currently in place but with a clean slate. The competing models would be reviewed and the best ideas or combination of ideas would be put forward. Even if the results turn out to resemble what is already in place, at least the process offers some comfort that we are pretty close to getting it right."--"Overview", p. [1] |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-4-ENC)ocn822979203 (OCoLC)822979203 (DE-599)BVBBV045345051 |
| dewey-full | 363.28760973 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 363 - Other social problems and services |
| dewey-raw | 363.28760973 |
| dewey-search | 363.28760973 |
| dewey-sort | 3363.28760973 |
| dewey-tens | 360 - Social problems and services; associations |
| discipline | Soziologie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03687nmm a2200517zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045345051</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181206s2012 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780833077356</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8330-7735-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">083307735X</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8330-7735-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780833077363</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8330-7736-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0833077368</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8330-7736-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-4-ENC)ocn822979203</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)822979203</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045345051</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">363.28760973</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jenkins, Brian Michael</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Aviation security</subfield><subfield code="b">after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review</subfield><subfield code="c">Brian Michael Jenkins</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">[Santa Monica, Calif.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Rand Corp.</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (11, [1] pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Occasional paper (Rand Corporation)</subfield><subfield code="v">OP-390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"RAND Homeland Security and Defense Center."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Aviation security is costly, controversial, and contentious; no other security measures directly affect such a large portion of the country's population. Because of the nature of the threat, aviation security is the most intrusive form of security, pushing hard on the frontier of civil liberties. And the threat is real: Terrorists remain obsessed with attacking airplanes. At the same time, passenger loads are increasing, while security budgets are likely to decline. Performance suffers. Meanwhile, public tolerance and cooperation are beginning to fray. But the Transportation Security Administration is often blamed for things beyond its control. And post-catastrophe reviews can push us in the wrong direction, usually resulting in new security measures rather than a reexamination of strategy. After 40 years of focus on tactical measures, it is time for a sweeping review of aviation security. Instead of forming the usual federal commission to undertake this task, several non-government research institutions could be selected to independently design an optimal aviation security system, beginning not with the four decades of accumulated security measures currently in place but with a clean slate. The competing models would be reviewed and the best ideas or combination of ideas would be put forward. Even if the results turn out to resemble what is already in place, at least the process offers some comfort that we are pretty close to getting it right."--"Overview", p. [1]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Law Enforcement</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TRANSPORTATION / Aviation / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Industries / Transportation</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aeronautics, Commercial / Security measures</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aeronautics / Safety measures</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Airline passenger security screening</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Airports / Security measures</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Terrorism / Prevention</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Airports</subfield><subfield code="x">Security measures</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="a">Airline passenger security screening</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="a">Aeronautics, Commercial</subfield><subfield code="x">Security measures</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="a">Aeronautics</subfield><subfield code="x">Safety measures</subfield><subfield code="a">Terrorism</subfield><subfield code="x">Prevention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rand Corporation</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RAND Homeland Security and Defense Center</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Jenkins, Brian Michael</subfield><subfield code="t">Aviation security</subfield><subfield code="d">[Santa Monica, Calif.] : Rand Corp., 2012</subfield><subfield code="z">9780833077028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-ENC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030731754</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV045345051 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:15:32Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780833077356 083307735X 9780833077363 0833077368 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030731754 |
| oclc_num | 822979203 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 online resource (11, [1] pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-ENC |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Rand Corp. |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Occasional paper (Rand Corporation) |
| spelling | Jenkins, Brian Michael Verfasser aut Aviation security after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review Brian Michael Jenkins [Santa Monica, Calif.] Rand Corp. 2012 2012 1 online resource (11, [1] pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Occasional paper (Rand Corporation) OP-390 "RAND Homeland Security and Defense Center." Print version record "Aviation security is costly, controversial, and contentious; no other security measures directly affect such a large portion of the country's population. Because of the nature of the threat, aviation security is the most intrusive form of security, pushing hard on the frontier of civil liberties. And the threat is real: Terrorists remain obsessed with attacking airplanes. At the same time, passenger loads are increasing, while security budgets are likely to decline. Performance suffers. Meanwhile, public tolerance and cooperation are beginning to fray. But the Transportation Security Administration is often blamed for things beyond its control. And post-catastrophe reviews can push us in the wrong direction, usually resulting in new security measures rather than a reexamination of strategy. After 40 years of focus on tactical measures, it is time for a sweeping review of aviation security. Instead of forming the usual federal commission to undertake this task, several non-government research institutions could be selected to independently design an optimal aviation security system, beginning not with the four decades of accumulated security measures currently in place but with a clean slate. The competing models would be reviewed and the best ideas or combination of ideas would be put forward. Even if the results turn out to resemble what is already in place, at least the process offers some comfort that we are pretty close to getting it right."--"Overview", p. [1] POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Law Enforcement bisacsh TRANSPORTATION / Aviation / General bisacsh BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Industries / Transportation bisacsh Aeronautics, Commercial / Security measures fast Aeronautics / Safety measures fast Airline passenger security screening fast Airports / Security measures fast Terrorism / Prevention fast Airports Security measures United States Airline passenger security screening United States Aeronautics, Commercial Security measures United States Aeronautics Safety measures Terrorism Prevention Rand Corporation Sonstige oth RAND Homeland Security and Defense Center Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Jenkins, Brian Michael Aviation security [Santa Monica, Calif.] : Rand Corp., 2012 9780833077028 |
| spellingShingle | Jenkins, Brian Michael Aviation security after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review "Aviation security is costly, controversial, and contentious; no other security measures directly affect such a large portion of the country's population. Because of the nature of the threat, aviation security is the most intrusive form of security, pushing hard on the frontier of civil liberties. And the threat is real: Terrorists remain obsessed with attacking airplanes. At the same time, passenger loads are increasing, while security budgets are likely to decline. Performance suffers. Meanwhile, public tolerance and cooperation are beginning to fray. But the Transportation Security Administration is often blamed for things beyond its control. And post-catastrophe reviews can push us in the wrong direction, usually resulting in new security measures rather than a reexamination of strategy. After 40 years of focus on tactical measures, it is time for a sweeping review of aviation security. Instead of forming the usual federal commission to undertake this task, several non-government research institutions could be selected to independently design an optimal aviation security system, beginning not with the four decades of accumulated security measures currently in place but with a clean slate. The competing models would be reviewed and the best ideas or combination of ideas would be put forward. Even if the results turn out to resemble what is already in place, at least the process offers some comfort that we are pretty close to getting it right."--"Overview", p. [1] POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Law Enforcement bisacsh TRANSPORTATION / Aviation / General bisacsh BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Industries / Transportation bisacsh Aeronautics, Commercial / Security measures fast Aeronautics / Safety measures fast Airline passenger security screening fast Airports / Security measures fast Terrorism / Prevention fast Airports Security measures United States Airline passenger security screening United States Aeronautics, Commercial Security measures United States Aeronautics Safety measures Terrorism Prevention |
| title | Aviation security after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review |
| title_auth | Aviation security after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review |
| title_exact_search | Aviation security after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review |
| title_full | Aviation security after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review Brian Michael Jenkins |
| title_fullStr | Aviation security after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review Brian Michael Jenkins |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aviation security after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review Brian Michael Jenkins |
| title_short | Aviation security |
| title_sort | aviation security after four decades it s time for a fundamental review |
| title_sub | after four decades, it's time for a fundamental review |
| topic | POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Law Enforcement bisacsh TRANSPORTATION / Aviation / General bisacsh BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Industries / Transportation bisacsh Aeronautics, Commercial / Security measures fast Aeronautics / Safety measures fast Airline passenger security screening fast Airports / Security measures fast Terrorism / Prevention fast Airports Security measures United States Airline passenger security screening United States Aeronautics, Commercial Security measures United States Aeronautics Safety measures Terrorism Prevention |
| topic_facet | POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Law Enforcement TRANSPORTATION / Aviation / General BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Industries / Transportation Aeronautics, Commercial / Security measures Aeronautics / Safety measures Airline passenger security screening Airports / Security measures Terrorism / Prevention Airports Security measures United States Airline passenger security screening United States Aeronautics, Commercial Security measures United States Aeronautics Safety measures Terrorism Prevention |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jenkinsbrianmichael aviationsecurityafterfourdecadesitstimeforafundamentalreview AT randcorporation aviationsecurityafterfourdecadesitstimeforafundamentalreview AT randhomelandsecurityanddefensecenter aviationsecurityafterfourdecadesitstimeforafundamentalreview |