Levels of argument: a comparative study of Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean ethics

Dominic Scott compares the 'Republic' and 'Nicomachean Ethics' from a methodological perspective. He argues that Plato and Aristotle distinguish similar levels of argument in the defence of justice, and that they both follow the same approach: Plato because he thinks it will suff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scott, Dominic (Author)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 2015
Edition:First edition
Subjects:
Online Access:FUBA1
Volltext
Summary:Dominic Scott compares the 'Republic' and 'Nicomachean Ethics' from a methodological perspective. He argues that Plato and Aristotle distinguish similar levels of argument in the defence of justice, and that they both follow the same approach: Plato because he thinks it will suffice, Aristotle because he thinks there is no need to go beyond it
Physical Description:1 Online-Ressource (VI, 235 Seiten)
ISBN:9780191799877
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249640.001.0001