Evidence in international investment arbitration:
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
[2018]
|
| Edition: | First edition |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Physical Description: | XXXVIII, 325 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9780198753506 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044958847 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190129 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 180524s2018 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780198753506 |c Hardback: GBP 125.00, EUR 151.99 (DE) |9 978-0-19-875350-6 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9780198753506 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1026992731 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ500222711 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-188 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 346.092 | |
| 084 | |a PR 2353 |0 (DE-625)139576: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PR 2566 |0 (DE-625)139616: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sourgens, Frédéric Gilles |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1075386306 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evidence in international investment arbitration |c Frédéric G. Sourgens (Washburn University School of Law, USA), Kabir AN Duggal (Baker McKenzie, USA), Ian A Laird (Crowell & Moring LLP, USA) |
| 250 | |a First edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Oxford University Press |c [2018] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2018 | |
| 300 | |a XXXVIII, 325 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 653 | 0 | |a Investments, Foreign (International law) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Arbitration (International law) | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Duggal, Kabir |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1153220415 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Laird, Ian A. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1176550349 |4 aut | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030351440&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030351440 | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1829471072676741120 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
DETAILED CONTENTS
TABLE OF CASES XXI
PARTI: INTRODUCTION
1. SITUATING EVIDENCE IN THE PROCESS OF INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION
I. WHY EVIDENCE? 1.01
II. INDUCTIVE METHODOLOGY 1.10
III. THE BASIC PREMISE 1.15
IV. THE CORE PARTICIPANTS 1.16
A. APPLICATION TO ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS 1.17
B. APPLICATION TO TRIBUNAL-APPOINTED EXPERTS 1.21
C. APPLICATION TO PARTIES 1.22
D. APPLICATION TO COUNSEL 1.25
E. APPLICATION TO WITNESSES AND PARTY-APPOINTED EXPERTS 1.28
V. THE COMMON SUBSTANTIVE PROBLEM 1.30
A. PROCESS OF DECISION 1.33
B. ASSEMBLY OF DIE RECORD 1.34
VI. DEFINITION OF NON LIQUET 1.39
A. NON LIQUET IN GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW 1.41
B. NON LIQUET IN THE PRACTICE OF INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION 1.44
C. CONSEQUENCE OF PROHIBITION OF MW&7# FOR DIE LAW OF EVIDENCE 1.48
VII. INTERNAL VALUE OF INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION AND EVIDENCE 1.49
PART II: BURDEN AND STANDARD OF PROOF
IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION
2. BURDEN OF PROOF IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION
I. INTRODUCTION AND POSITION OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
2.01
II. APPLICABILITY AND PREVALENCE OF THE BASIC RULE IN INTERNATIONAL
ARBITRATION 2.05
A. THE BASIC RULE APPLIES TO FACTUAL ALLEGATION OF THE PARTY MAKING DIE
ASSERTION*
WHETHER CLAIMANT OR RESPONDENT 2.08
B. ADDITIONAL RULES ON BURDEN CLARIFIED BY TRIBUNALS 2.14
1. BURDEN OF PROOF AND HARDSHIP: THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS NOT ALTERED
BECAUSE OF THE HARDSHIPS SUFFERED IN OBTAINING AND SUBMITTING
EVIDENCE BY THE PARTY UPON WHICH IT IS PLACED 2.15
2. BURDEN OF PROOF AND COMPARATIVE EASE OF ACCESS TO EVIDENCE: THE
BURDEN OF
PROOF IS NOT ALTERED BECAUSE THE NON-MOVING PARTY HAS GREATER EASE OF
ACCESS
TO PROBATIVE EVIDENCE 2.17
XIN
DETAILED CONTENTS
3. BURDEN OF PROOF AND DEFAULT: THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS NOT DISCHARGED BY
THE
NON-MOVING PARTY'S FAILURE TO PARTICIPATE IN ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS 2.19
4. BURDEN OF PROOF APPLIES THROUGHOUT THE ARBITRAL PROCESS INCLUDING
VARIOUS
MOTIONS THAT MIGHT BE BROUGHT 2.21
C. FUNCTION OF DIE RULE 2.24
III. BURDENOF PROOF AND THE JURISDICTIONAL PHASE OF A CASE 2.30
A. BURDEN OF PROOF IN THE INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT OF JURISDICTION 2.31
B. BURDEN OF PROOF IN THE INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT OF A COGNIZABLE CLAIM
2.37
C. RESPONDENT'S REBUTTAL OF FACTUAL QUESTIONS IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
JURISDICTION 2.47
D. RESPONDENTS BURDEN OF PROOF AT THE JURISDICTIONAL PHASE 2.53
E. FUNCTION OF THE JURISDICTIONAL BURDEN OF PROOF 2.56
IV. BURDEN OF PROOF AND THE DAMAGES PHASE OF A CASE 2.61
A. DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE REMEDY: CLAIMANT'S BURDEN 2.63
B. AWARDING NON-SPECULATIVE DAMAGES: CLAIMANT'S BURDEN 2.68
C. DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE REMEDY: RESPONDENTS BURDEN 2.70
D. AWARDING NON-SPECULATIVE DAMAGES: RESPONDENT'S BURDEN 2.72
E. FUNCTION OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF AT DIE DAMAGES/REMEDIES PHASE 2.74
V. TIMEFRAME IN WHICH A BURDEN MUST BE DISCHARGED 2.77
A. INTRODUCTION 2.77
B. CONSEQUENCES OF TIMELINESS 2.80
C. FUNCTION OF THE TIMELINESS RULE 2.81
VI. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE TO DISCHARGE A BURDEN OF PROOF 2.82
A. CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PARTIES 2.83
B. CONSEQUENCES FOR AN AWARD ISSUED IN DEROGATION OF BURDENS OF PROOF
2.85
VII. PROBLEMS IN THE APPLICATION OF THIS BASIC PRINCIPLE 2.88
A. IDENTIFICATION OF THE 'CLAIMANT' 2.89
B. BURDENS OF PROOF AND APPLICABLE SUBSTANTIVE LAW 2.92
C. THE RESPONDENT'S PROCEDURAL ADVANTAGE 2.93
D. OTHER PROBLEMS 2.94
3. SHIFTING THE BURDEN OF EVIDENCE
I. INTRODUCTION AND POSITION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 3.01
II. THE SHIFTING PRINCIPLE IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION 3.12
III. DOCTRINE OF PRESUMPTIONS AND SHIFTING THE EVIDENCE 3.24
IV. THE SHIFTING RULE AND THE JURISDICTIONAL PHASE OF THE CASE 3.28
V. CONSEQUENCES OF THE RULE 3.32
VI. PROBLEMS IN THE APPLICATION OF SHIFTING OF EVIDENCE 3.36
4. INTRODUCTION TO THE STANDARD OF PROOF IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION
I. INTRODUCTION AND POSITION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 4.01
II. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BURDEN OF PROOF AND STANDARD OF PROOF 4.04
III. AN OVERVIEW OF THE STANDARD OF PROOF 4.10
IV. TRIBUNAL'S DISCRETION TO DEAL WITH EVIDENTIARY MATTERS TO ITS OWN
SATISFACTION 4.16
V. PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DOCTRINE OF STANDARD OF PROOF 4.23
XIV
DETAILED CONTENTS
5. DIFFERENT STANDARDS OF PROOF IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION
I. INTRODUCTION AND POSITION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 5.01
II. PRO TERN (PRIMA FACIE) EVIDENCE AT THE JURISDICTIONAL PHASE 5.06
III. BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES OR PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE 5.09
A. INTRODUCTION 5.09
B. WHEN DOES THIS STANDARD APPLY? 5.15
C. SIMILARITY TO THE CIVIL LAW 'INNER CONVICTION TEST 5.17
D. STANDARD OF PROOF AT THE DAMAGES PHASE 5.22
E. PROBLEMS WITH THE APPLICATION OF BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES OR
PREPONDERANCE OF
EVIDENCE 5.23
IV. HEIGHTENED STANDARD OF PROOF 5.25
A. HEIGHTENED STANDARD FOR 'SERIOUS' ISSUES 5.25
B. HEIGHTENED STANDARD WHEN THE ARBITRAL RULES CALL FOR IT 5.29
C. WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE HEIGHTENED STANDARD? 5.32
V. THE SPECIAL CASE ON CORRUPTION, FRAUD, IMPROPRIETY, AND OTHER
ALLEGATIONS
OF WRONGDOING MORE GENERALLY 5.33
A. INTRODUCTION 5.33
B. ADDITIONAL RULES AS CLARIFIED BY TRIBUNALS 5.36
C. RULES RELATING TO CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE 5.48
D. 'CONNECTING THE DOTS'AND RED FLAGS 5.51
E. DIFFICULTY IN PROVING ALLEGATIONS OF WRONGDOING 5.53
E PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HEIGHTENED STANDARD OF PROOF 5.63
VI. EVIDENTIARY CONSEQUENCES OF WRONGDOINGS 5.65
A. POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGES 5.66
B. POTENTIAL ADMISSIBILITY CHALLENGES 5.68
C. POTENTIAL MERITS OR DAMAGES ARGUMENTS 5.70
D. INTERIM CONCLUSIONS 5.73
VII. THE USE OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE 5.74
PART III: PRESUMPTIONS AND INFERENCES
6. EVIDENTIARY PRESUMPTIONS
I. PRESUMPTIONS IN GENERAL 6.01
A. INTRODUCTION AND POSITION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 6.03
B. FUNCTION OF PRESUMPTIONS IN GENERAL 6.06
II. ARBITRATION RULES AND THE APPLICATION OF PRESUMPTIONS IN GENERAL
6.08
A. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRESUMPTIONS AND BURDENS OF PROOF 6.12
B. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRESUMPTIONS AND INFERENCES 6.15
III. JUDICIAL PRESUMPTIONS 6.17
A. THE CONSTITUTIVE FUNCTION OF THE LEGAL PRESUMPTION OF GOOD FAITH IN
FORMULATING JUDICIAL PRESUMPTIONS 6.18
B. THE EVIDENTIARY PREDICATE FOR JUDICIAL PRESUMPTIONS 6.23
C. APPLICATION OF JUDICIAL PRESUMPTIONS TO THE ARBITRATION RECORD 6.26
D. THE REBUTTABLE NATURE OF JUDICIAL PRESUMPTIONS 6.27
XV
DETAILED CONTENTS
IV. LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS 6.29
A. GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW PRESUMPTIONS IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION
6.30
B. MUNICIPAL LAW PRESUMPTIONS IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION 6.32
C. ROLE OF INVESTOR-STATE JURISPRUDENCE IN DEVELOPING LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS
FOR
APPLICATION IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION 6.34
D. TYPICAL REBUTTAL NATURE OF LEGAL PRESUMPTION 6.35
V. LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS DEVELOPED BY INVESTOR-STATE TRIBUNALS IN THE
JURISDICTIONAL CONTEXT 6.37
A. OFFICIAL HOME STATE CERTIFICATION OF NATIONALITY ENTAILS NATIONALITY
6.38
B. REGISTRATION IN THE SHAREHOLDER REGISTRY GIVES ENTAILS OWNERSHIP 6.39
C. MAJORITY OWNERSHIP ENTAILS CONTROL OF AN ENTERPRISE 6.41
D. EFFECTIVE CONTROL, ONCE ESTABLISHED, IS CONTINUOUS 6.43
E. THE MAKING OF AN INVESTMENT CONTRIBUTES TO DIE HOST STATE ECONOMY
6.45
F. MFN CLAUSES PRESUMPTIVELY DO NOT EXTEND A CONSENT TO ARBITRATION 6.46
VI. LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS DEVELOPED BY INVESTOR-STATE TRIBUNALS IN DIE
MERITS
CONTEXT 6.48
A. OFFICIAL GOVERNMENTAL ACTS ARE VALID 6.49
B. NO GENERAL EXPECTATION OF COMPLETE REGULATORY STABILITY 6.51
C. DIFFERENCE IN TREATMENT BETWEEN COMPARABLE INVESTORS ENTAILS
DISCRIMINATION 6.52
D. LEGAL INSTRUMENTS DO NOT PERMIT SELF-JUDGING INTERPRETATIONS 6.54
E. LEGAL INSTRUMENTS DO NOT HAVE RETROACTIVE EFFECT 6.56
VII. LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS DEVELOPED IN THE REMEDIES CONTEXT 6.57
A. AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE RELIABLE ALTHOUGH EVERY DOCUMENT
SUBMITTED
MIGHT NOT BE AUTHENTIC 6.58
B. CONSOLIDATION OF PROCEEDINGS 6.60
VIII. CONCLUSION 6.61
7. IURA NOVIT CURIA AND PROOF OF LAW
I. PROOF OF LAW IN GENERAL
II. IURA NOVIT CURIA
A. INTRODUCTION AND POSITION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
1. APPROACH 1: ANALOGY TO JUDICIAL NOTICE
2. APPROACH 2: INHERENT POWERS
B. IURA NOVIT CURIA IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION
C. PARTY COMMENT AND IURA NOVIT CURIA
D. CONCLUSION
III. PROOF OF LAW BEYOND IURA NOVIT CURIA
8. INFERENCES FROM EVIDENCE OR ITS ABSENCE
I. INFERENCES IN GENERAL
A. INTRODUCTION AND POSITION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
B. FUNCTION OF THE RULE
C. ARBITRATION RULES AND THE APPLICATION OF THE BASIC RULE
D. INFERENCES AND INDIRECT OR CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
II. PLAUSIBILITY AS MEASURE FOR THE DRAWING OF INFERENCES
A. PLAUSIBILI TY AND BURDEN OF PROOF
B. PLAUSIBILITY AND STANDARDS OF PROOF
III. INFERENCES OUTSIDE THE MERITS CONTEXT
7.01
7.08
7.09
7.10
7.15
7.19
7.28
7.33
7.37
8.01
8.03
8.04
8.07
8.09
8.11
8.22
8.27
8.30
XVI
DETAILED CONTENTS
IV. INFERENCES ARISING FROM THE RECORD 8.31
A. DIFFICULTY OF PROOF THROUGH DIRECT EVIDENCE 8.32
B. THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE INFERENCE TO DIRECT RECORD EVIDENCE 8.35
C. THE QUALITY OF DIRECT EVIDENCE SUPPORTING DIE INFERENCE 8.37
D. THE QUANTITY OF DIRECT EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE INFERENCE 8.38
E. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INFERENCE 8.39
V. CIRCUMSTANCES SIGNIFICANT IN REBUTTING THE DRAWING OF RECORD
INFERENCES 8.40
VI. INFERENCES ARISING FROM THE MISCONDUCT OF THE PARTIES IN ADDUCING
EVIDENCE
(EG FAILURE TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS) IN ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS 8.42
A. FUNCTION OF THE RULE 8.43
B. SEVERITY OF PROCEDURAL BAD FAITH 8.46
C. RELATIONSHIP OF PROCEDURAL BAD FAITH TO THE FACT TO BE PROVED 8.51
D. THE IMPORTANCE OF PROCEDURAL CLEAN HANDS OF THE PARTY SEEKING AN
INFERENCE 8.52
E. THE RELATIONSHIP OF INFERENCES ARISING FROM PARTY MISCONDUCT AND
INFERENCES
ARISING FROM THE RECORD 8.53
F. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DIE INFERENCE 8.56
VII. CONCLUSION 8.60
PART IV: PROVING YOUR CASE
9. DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION
I. INTRODUCTION 9.01
II. DOCUMENTS 9.02
A. CONTEMPORANEOUS DOCUMENTS 9.04
B. TRANSLATIONS OF DOCUMENTS 9.06
C. LANGUAGE ISSUES RELATING TO MULTIPLE VERSIONS OF A TREATY 9.10
D. AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS AND DISPUTED DOCUMENTS 9.20
III. DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 9.23
A. DISCOVERY VERSUS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 9.24
B. NO 'FISHING EXPEDITION 9.26
C. THE ARBITRAL RULES ON DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 9.27
D. REQUEST TO PRODUCE 9.31
E. USE OFREDFERN SCHEDULES TO AID IN DIE DOCUMENT PRODUCTION PROCESS
9.32
E CRITERIA FOR DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 9.37
1. RELEVANCE TO THE CASE 9.38
2. MATERIALITY TO THE OUTCOME 9.40
3. NARROW AND SPECIFIC CATEGORY OF DOCUMENTS 9.41
4. STATEMENT OF BELIEF ON THE EXISTENCE OF DOCUMENTS THAT ARE IN
POSSESSION,
CUSTODY, OR CONTROL OF OPPOSING PARTY 9.46
5. THE SEARCH FOR AND HANDOVER OF THE DOCUMENTS WOULD NOT BE
'UNREASONABLY
BURDENSOME' 9.48
G. PRIVILEGE, PRIVILEGE LOGS, AND APPOINTMENT OF EXPERTS 9.50
H. CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO MEET A TRIBUNAL'S ORDER ON DOCUMENT
PRODUCTION 9.56
10. WITNESSES AND EXPERTS
I. PARRY FACT WITNESSES 10.03
A. FUNCTION OF PARTY WITNESS TESTIMONY 10.05
B. TIMELY IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY WITNESSES 10.08
XVII
DETAILED CONTENTS
C. PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE AND HEARSAY TESTIMONY IN WITNESS STATEMENT 10.14
D. FORMAL REQUIREMENTS OF DIRECT TESTIMONY: THE WITNESS STATEMENT 10.24
E. COUNSELS ROLE IN COLLECTING THE WITNESS STATEMENT 10.28
II. CROSS-EXAMINATION OF A WITNESS 10.32
A. CALLING A WITNESS FOR CROSS-EXAMINATION 10.32
B. CROSS-EXAMINATION BY TELE-OR VIDEO-CONFERENCE 10.36
C. FUNCTION OF CROSS-EXAMINATION 10.40
D. SCOPE OF CROSS-EXAMINATION 10.45
E. METHOD OF CROSS-EXAMINATION 10.48
F. OBJECTIONS TO TESTIMONY AT THE HEARING 10.62
G. EXAMINATION BY THE TRIBUNAL 10.63
H. REDIRECT EXAMINATION 10.65
I. CONSEQUENCE OF NON-APPEARANCE OF A WITNESS CALLED FOR
CROSS-EXAMINATION 10.67
III. TRIBUNAL OF FACT WITNESSES 10.74
A. FUNCTION OF TRIBUNAL WITNESS TESTIMONY 10.76
B. PARTY APPLICATIONS TO REQUEST CALLING OF A TRIBUNAL WITNESS 10.79
C. TRIBUNAL CONTROL OF THE EXAMINATION OF A TRIBUNAL WITNESS 10.82
D. CONSEQUENCE OF NON-APPEARANCE OF A TRIBUNAL WITNESS 10.86
IV. EXPERTS 10.88
A. PARTY EXPERT WITNESSES 10.88
B. TIMELY IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY EXPERT WITNESS 10.90
C. QUALIFICATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES 10.93
D. BASIS OF EXPERT TESTIMONY 10.96
E. FORMAL REQUIREMENTS OF DIRECT TESTIMONY: DIE EXPERT REPORT 10.103
F. APPOINTMENT OF TRIBUNAL EXPERTS 10.105
G. CALLING AN EXPERT FOR CROSS-EXAMINATION 10.107
H. METHODS OF EXPERT CROSS-EXAMINATION 10.110
I. CONSEQUENCE OF NON-APPEARANCE OF AN EXPERT CALLED FOR
CROSS-EXAMINATION 10.119
V. CONCLUSION 10.120
PART V: SAFEGUARDING THE PROCESS
11. EXCLUSIONARY RULES OF EVIDENCE
I. INTRODUCTION: ABSENCE OF EXCLUSIONARY RULES IN GENERAL 11.01
A. FUNCTION OF THE ABSENCE OF EXCLUSIONARY RULES IN GENERAL 11.04
II. EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE AND PRIVILEGE 11.09
A. THE FUNCTION OF PRIVILEGE 11.11
B. APPLICABLE LAW 11.14
C. DIFFERENT TYPES OF PRIVILEGES IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION 11.20
1. ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE 11.20
2. WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGE 11.26
3. CABINET PRIVILEGE 11.27
4. IN-HOUSE PRIVILEGE 11.34
5. OTHER PRIVILEGES 11.35
D. WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE 11.36
E. PRIVILEGE LOGS 11.39
XVLLL
DETAILED CONTENTS
III. EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 11.43
A. THE FUNCTION OF CONFIDENTIALITY 11.45
B. TYPES OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 11.50
1. COMMERCIAL CONFIDENTIALITY 11.50
2. TECHNICAL CONFIDENTIALITY 11.56
3. ODIER CONFIDENTIALITY INTERESTS 11.59
C. PROVING CONFIDENTIALITY 11.61
IV. EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE ON POLITICAL OR INSTITUTIONAL SENSITIVITY
11.63
V. EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE TO PROTECT THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD 11.66
VI. EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE TO PROTECT DIE EQUALITY OF THE PARTIES 11.72
VII. EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE TO PROTECT FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF
INTERNATIONAL
PUBLIC POLICY 11.88
VIII. CONCLUSION 11.92
12. EVIDENCE AND ANNULMENT
I. ANNULMENT IN GENERAL 12.01
A. FUNCTION OF ANNULMENT 12.04
B. ANNULMENT AND EVIDENCE 12.12
II. SERIOUS DEPARTURE FROM A FUNDAMENTAL RULE OF PROCEDURE IN THE
EVIDENTIARY CONTEXT 12.15
A. FUNCTION OF DIE GROUND OF NULLITY IN DIE EVIDENTIARY CONTEXT 12.17
B. FAILURE OF DIE RIGHT TO BE HEARD 12.20
C. EQUALITY OF THE PARTIES 12.25
III. FAILURE TO STATE REASONS IN THE EVIDENTIARY CONTEXT 12.30
A. FUNCTION OF DIE GROUND OF NULLITY 12.31
B. CONTRADICTORY REASONING AND EVIDENCE 12.35
C. MATERIAL LACUNAE AND EVIDENCE 12.38
IV. MANIFEST EXCESS OF POWERS IN THE EVIDENTIARY CONTEXT 12.42
A. FAILURE TO APPLY DIE APPLICABLE LAW IN THE EVIDENTIARY CONTEXT 12.43
B. TENABILITY OF EXERCISE OF EVIDENTIARY DISCRETION 12.47
V. CONCLUSION 12.54
APPENDIX I. EVIDENTIARY PRINCIPLES IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION 291
APPENDIX II. TABLE SUMMARIZING THE COMMONLY RECOGNIZED STANDARDS OF
PROOF IN
INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION 309
INDEX 311
XIX |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Sourgens, Frédéric Gilles Duggal, Kabir Laird, Ian A. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1075386306 (DE-588)1153220415 (DE-588)1176550349 |
| author_facet | Sourgens, Frédéric Gilles Duggal, Kabir Laird, Ian A. |
| author_role | aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Sourgens, Frédéric Gilles |
| author_variant | f g s fg fgs k d kd i a l ia ial |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044958847 |
| classification_rvk | PR 2353 PR 2566 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1026992731 (DE-599)BSZ500222711 |
| dewey-full | 346.092 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 346 - Private law |
| dewey-raw | 346.092 |
| dewey-search | 346.092 |
| dewey-sort | 3346.092 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | First edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044958847</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190129</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180524s2018 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780198753506</subfield><subfield code="c">Hardback: GBP 125.00, EUR 151.99 (DE)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-875350-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780198753506</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1026992731</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ500222711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">346.092</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2353</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139576:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2566</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139616:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sourgens, Frédéric Gilles</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1075386306</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evidence in international investment arbitration</subfield><subfield code="c">Frédéric G. Sourgens (Washburn University School of Law, USA), Kabir AN Duggal (Baker McKenzie, USA), Ian A Laird (Crowell & Moring LLP, USA)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2018]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXXVIII, 325 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign (International law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Arbitration (International law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duggal, Kabir</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1153220415</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laird, Ian A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1176550349</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030351440&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030351440</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044958847 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-04-15T12:19:33Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780198753506 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030351440 |
| oclc_num | 1026992731 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-188 |
| physical | XXXVIII, 325 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Sourgens, Frédéric Gilles Verfasser (DE-588)1075386306 aut Evidence in international investment arbitration Frédéric G. Sourgens (Washburn University School of Law, USA), Kabir AN Duggal (Baker McKenzie, USA), Ian A Laird (Crowell & Moring LLP, USA) First edition Oxford Oxford University Press [2018] © 2018 XXXVIII, 325 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Investments, Foreign (International law) Arbitration (International law) Duggal, Kabir Verfasser (DE-588)1153220415 aut Laird, Ian A. Verfasser (DE-588)1176550349 aut SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030351440&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Sourgens, Frédéric Gilles Duggal, Kabir Laird, Ian A. Evidence in international investment arbitration |
| title | Evidence in international investment arbitration |
| title_auth | Evidence in international investment arbitration |
| title_exact_search | Evidence in international investment arbitration |
| title_full | Evidence in international investment arbitration Frédéric G. Sourgens (Washburn University School of Law, USA), Kabir AN Duggal (Baker McKenzie, USA), Ian A Laird (Crowell & Moring LLP, USA) |
| title_fullStr | Evidence in international investment arbitration Frédéric G. Sourgens (Washburn University School of Law, USA), Kabir AN Duggal (Baker McKenzie, USA), Ian A Laird (Crowell & Moring LLP, USA) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evidence in international investment arbitration Frédéric G. Sourgens (Washburn University School of Law, USA), Kabir AN Duggal (Baker McKenzie, USA), Ian A Laird (Crowell & Moring LLP, USA) |
| title_short | Evidence in international investment arbitration |
| title_sort | evidence in international investment arbitration |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030351440&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sourgensfredericgilles evidenceininternationalinvestmentarbitration AT duggalkabir evidenceininternationalinvestmentarbitration AT lairdiana evidenceininternationalinvestmentarbitration |