Contesting immigration policy in court: legal activism and its radiating effects in the United States and France

"What difference does law make in immigration policymaking? Since the 1970s, networks of progressive attorneys in both the US and France have attempted to use litigation to assert rights for non-citizens. Yet judicial engagement - while numerically voluminous - remains doctrinally curtailed. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kawar, Leila 1976- (Author)
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: New York Cambridge University Press [2016]
Edition:First paperback edition
Series:Cambridge studies in law and society
Subjects:
Summary:"What difference does law make in immigration policymaking? Since the 1970s, networks of progressive attorneys in both the US and France have attempted to use litigation to assert rights for non-citizens. Yet judicial engagement - while numerically voluminous - remains doctrinally curtailed. This study offers new insights into the constitutive role of law in immigration policymaking by focusing on the legal frames, narratives, and performances forged through action in court. Challenging the conventional wisdom that 'cause litigation' has little long term impact on policymaking unless it produces broad rights-protective principles, this book shows that legal contestation can have important radiating effects on policy by reshaping how political actors approach immigration issues. Based on extensive fieldwork in the United States and France, this book explores the paths by which litigation has effected policy change in two paradigmatically different national contexts"--
Item Description:Includes bibliographical references and index
Physical Description:xvi, 210 Seiten Illustration 24 cm
ISBN:9781107415119

There is no print copy available.

Interlibrary loan Place Request Caution: Not in THWS collection!