Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia:
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
London and New York
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2018
|
| Series: | Rethinking Asia and international relations
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext Literaturverzeichnis Register // Gemischte Register |
| Item Description: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Physical Description: | xii, 193 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9780415791687 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044408105 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190306 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 170712s2018 xxk |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 016052926 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780415791687 |c hbk. |9 978-0-415-79168-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)976443291 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044408105 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
| 049 | |a DE-355 |a DE-12 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a DK510.764 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 337.4705 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a ML 7250 |0 (DE-625)123210: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Diesen, Glenn |0 (DE-588)1164975889 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia |c Glenn Diesen |
| 264 | 1 | |a London and New York |b Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a xii, 193 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Rethinking Asia and international relations | |
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Außenpolitik | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geopolitics |x Economic aspects |z Russia (Federation) | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wirtschaftspolitik |0 (DE-588)4066493-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Planung |0 (DE-588)4115587-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strategie |0 (DE-588)4057952-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Außenpolitik |0 (DE-588)4003846-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Geopolitik |0 (DE-588)4156741-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Russia (Federation) |x Foreign relations |z Eurasia | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Eurasia |x Foreign relations |z Russia (Federation) | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Russia (Federation) |x Foreign economic relations |z Eurasia | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Eurasia |x Foreign economic relations |z Russia (Federation) | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Russland |0 (DE-588)4076899-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Eurasien |0 (DE-588)4015685-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Russland |0 (DE-588)4076899-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Eurasien |0 (DE-588)4015685-0 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geopolitik |0 (DE-588)4156741-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Wirtschaftspolitik |0 (DE-588)4066493-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Außenpolitik |0 (DE-588)4003846-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Politische Planung |0 (DE-588)4115587-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |a Strategie |0 (DE-588)4057952-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |C b |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, ebk |z 978-1-315-21222-7 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000006&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Gemischte Register |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029809987 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 471 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 471 |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804177695145197568 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents
Preface by Professor Sergei Karaganov
Introduction
1 Theorising geoeconomic strategy for Eurasian integration
What is geoeconomics? 12
Asymmetries and the ‘balance of dependence 9 14
Rationality and liberal delusion of laissez-faire capitalism 17
Bargaining power: regionalism and selective accommodation 20
The geoeconomics of Eurasian connectivity 23
2 The rise, decline and potential revival of US geoeconomic
power
The rise of US geoeconomics in Eurasia 31
The decline of American geoeconomics 34
The potential for an American geoeconomic revival 40
3 Russia’s failed geoeconomic strategy for a Greater Europe
Yeltsin’s leaning-to-one-side strategy for a Greater Europe 49
Putin *s great power strategy for a Greater Europe 52
Moscow’s embrace of geoeconomics 53
Energy as the main instrument for symmetry in Europe 58
4 Russian geoeconomics in a Greater Eurasia
The geoeconomics of Russia’s New Eurasianism 65
The Russian far east and the imperative of dual integration 67
The physical infrastructure of Russia as a Eurasian state 69
Mechanisms for cooperation 75
x Contents
5 Chinese geoeconomics and the Silk Road development
strategy 81
China s provisional ՝peaceful rise * 82
The Silk Road project for a post-Western world 86
Risks to Russia 92
6 Russia and China: Convergence of the Eurasian core 95
From fear of geopolitical dominance to a geoeconomic
balance of power 96
Convergence of energy, infrastructure andfinancial policies 100
Institutional convergence 104
1 Strategic diversity in Northeast Asia: Japan and Korea 108
Japan and Russia at a crossroad 109
Korea and Russia: Eurasian integration for regional stability 117
8 Connectivity with Southern Eurasia 123
India, Iran and the North-South corridor 123
Southeast Asia: Vietnam as the gateway to ASEAN 130
9 Europe at the periphery of Greater Eurasia 136
The geoeconomic ascendance of the EU 137
The EU’s geoeconomic decline 139
The failing geoeconomics of wider Europe 146
EU bargaining power in Greater Eurasia 150
10 Conclusion: Towards a new Russian grand strategy 157
Bibliography 162
Index 187
Bibliography
Aaltola, M, Käpylä, J, Mikkola, H and Behr, T 2014, ‘Towards the geopolitics of flows:
implications for Finland’, FIIA Reports, no.40.
ADB 2011, ‘The New Silk Road: ten years of the Central Asia Economic Cooperation
Program’, Asian Development Bank, Manila.
ADB 2015, ‘ADB to help fund Pakistan’s first LNG regasification terminal’, Asia
Development Bank, 27 February.
ADB 2016, ‘TAPI pipeline to help Turkmenistan diversify gas exports, support growth’,
Asian Development Bank, 7 April.
Agnew, J and Corbridge, S 2002, Mastering space: hegemony, territory and international
political economy, Routledge, New York.
Ahrend, R 2005, ‘Can Russia break the “resource curse”?’, Eurasian Geography and
Economics, vol.46, no.8, pp.584-609.
Aiyar, SSA 2015, ‘Why US allies are happy to join China’s AIIB The Diplomat, 30 June.
Akimoto, K 2013, ‘The strategic value of territorial islands from the perspective of national
security’, Review of Island Studies, 9 October.
Albright, MK 1998, ‘The right balance will secure NATO’s future’, Financial Times,
7 December.
Amin, M 2016, ‘A pipeline to South Asia prosperity’, Foreign Policy, 3 February.
Amos, H 2015, ‘What would exclusion from payment system SWIFT mean For Russia?’,
The Moscow Times, 28 January.
Angell, N 1915, The world’s highway: some notes on America fs relation to sea power and
non-military sanctions for the Law of Nations^ George H. Doran Company, New York.
Applebaum, A 2015, ‘Interview with Anne Applebaum’. The Munk Debate: the West vs.
Russia, 15 April.
Arase, D 2015, ‘China’s Two Silk Roads initiative: what it means for Southeast Asia’,
Southeast Asian Affairs, pp.25^15.
Arif, A 2016, ‘Gawadar and Chabahar: implications for the region’, Institute of Strategic
Studies, 7 June.
Arrigo, G and G Casale, 2003, Glossary on labour law, industrial relations and European
Union institutions, International Labour Office, Geneva.
ASEAN 2010, ‘Master plan on ASEAN connectivity: one vision, one identity, one
community’, ASEAN Secretariat, December, Jakarta.
Åslund, A 2006, ‘The hunt for Russia’s riches’, Foreign Policy, vol. 152, pp.42-48.
Åslund, A 2012, ‘Putin’s Eurasian illusion will lead to isolation’, Moscow Times, 21 June.
Åslund, A 2015, ‘The IMF outfoxes Putin: policy change means Ukraine can receive more
loans’, Atlantic Council, 8 December.
Bibliography 163
Auboin, M 2012, ‘Use of currencies in international trade: any changes in the picture’,
World Trade Organization: Economic Research and Statistic Divisions, May.
Auton, GP 2016, ‘Japan, Russia and the Northern Territories dispute: reflections on an
evolving Northeast Asian balance of power’, Japan Studies Association Journal,
vol.9, pp.1-25.
Averre, D 2008, ‘Russian foreign policy and the global political environment’, Problems of
Post-Communism, vol.55, no.5, pp.28—39.
Baldwin, DA 1985, Economic statecraft, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Balzer, H 2005, ‘The Putin thesis and Russian energy policy’, Post-Soviet Affairs, vol.21,
no.3, pp.210-225.
Barbieri, K 2002, The liberal illusion: does trade promote peace?, University of Michigan
Press, Michigan.
Barris, M 2014, ‘Replace the dollar with super currency: Economist’, China Daily, 29 January.
Ваги, S 2012a, ‘Geo-economics and strategy’, Survival, vol.54, no.3, pp.47-58.
Ваги, S 2012b, ‘A new era of geo-economics: assessing the interplay of economic and
political risk’, IISS Geo-economic and Strategy Programme, 23-25 March.
Bassin, M, Glebov, S and Laruelle, M 2015, Between Europe and Asia: the origins, theories,
and legacies of Russian Eurasianism, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
BBC 2008, ‘Emily Maitlis interviewed Nigel Farage МЕР’, BBC, 31 August.
BBC 2014, ‘Farage: EU does have “blood on its hands” over Ukraine’, BBC, 27 March.
Bell, D 2008, The cultural contradictions of capitalism, Basic Books, New York.
Bergsten, CF 2012, ‘Why the Euro will survive completing the continent’s half-built
house’, Foreign Affairs, vol.91, no.5, pp.16-22.
Bertrand, N 2016, ‘Putin: the deterioration of Russia’s relationship with the West is the
result of many “mistakes’”, Business insider, 11 January.
Beunderman, M 2006, ‘Poland compares German-Russian pipeline to Nazi-Soviet pact’,
EU Observer, 2 May.
Bin, Y 2014, Dutkiewicz, P and Sakwa, R 2014, Eurasian integration — the view from
within, Routledge, New York.
Blackwill, RD and Harris, JM 2016, War by other means: geoeconomics and statecraft,
Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Blagov, S 2012, ‘Russia mulls Far Eastern economic revival’, Eurasian Daily Monitor,
vol.9, no.83, 2 May.
Blanchard, В 2016, ‘Duterte aligns Philippines with China, says U.S. has lost’, Reuters,
20 October.
Blank, S 2014, ‘Russia’s game in North Korea’, Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume, 7 May.
Blank, S 2015, ‘Is Russia a great power in Asia?’, in A Klieman (ed.), Great powers and
geopolitics: international affairs in a rebalancing world, Springer, Israel, pp. 161-182.
Blank, S 2016, ‘Russia and the TAPI pipeline’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, vol.12, no.227.
Bloomberg 2015, ‘Russia pips Saudi Arabia in race to grab China oil market share’,
Bloomberg News, 23 June.
Blouet, BW 2005, ‘Halford Mackinder and the pivotal heartland’, in BW Blouet (ed.), Global
Geostrategy: Mackinder and the defence of the West, Frank Cass Publishers, London.
Bordachev, T 2015, ‘Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union: the view from Moscow’,
European Council on Foreign Relations, 21 January.
Bordachev, T 2016, ‘Russia and China in Central Asia: the great win-win game’, Russia in
Global Affairs, 1 July.
Boren, Z 2015, ‘Ukraine crisis: top Chinese diplomat backs Putin and says West should
“abandon zero-sum mentality”’, The Independent, 27 February.
164 Bibliography
Borger, J 2016, ‘Russian hostility “partly caused by west”, claims former US defence
head’, The Guardian, 10 March.
Borocs, J 2015, ‘Geopolitical scenarios for European integration’, in F Miszlivets and J
Jensen (eds), Reframing Europe s future, Palgrave, Abingdon, pp. 19-34.
Boudreaux, R 2011, ‘Putin calls U.S. a “parasite” over its debt’, The Wall Street Journal, 2
August.
Bradford, A 2012, ‘The Brussels effect’, Northwestern University Law Review, vol.107,
no.l, pp.1-67.
Bradford, A 2015, ‘Exporting standards: the extemalization of the EU’s regulatory power
via markets’, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.42, pp. 158—173.
Braghiroli, S and Makarychev, A 2016, ‘Russia and its supporters in Europe: trans-ideology
a la carte’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, vol. 16, no.2, pp.213—233.
Brattberg, E and De Lima, BP 2015, ‘Germany’s unipolar moment’, Berlin Policy Journal,
21 September.
Breslin, S 2010, ‘Comparative theory, China, and the future of East Asian regionalism(s)’,
Review of International Studies, vol.36, no.3, pp.709-729.
Bretherton, C and Vogler, J 1999, The European Union as a global actor, Routledge,
New York.
Brics Post 2014, ‘BRICS condemn sanctions against Russia’, The BRICS Post, 16 July.
Brown, JD 2013, ‘The 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Russian-Japanese relations’,
Post-Soviet Affairs, vol.29, no.3, pp. 197—236.
Brown, JD 2015, ‘Towards an Anti-Japanese territorial front? Russia and the Senkaku/
Diaoyu dispute’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol.67, no.6, pp.893-915.
Brown, JD 2016, Japan, Russia and their territorial dispute: the Northern delusion,
Routledge, New York.
Browning, CS 2003, ‘The region-building approach revisited: the continued othering of
Russia in discourses of region-building in the European north’, Geopolitics, vol.8,
no.l, pp.45-71.
Browning, CS and Joenniemi, P 2008, ‘Geostrategies of the European Neighbourhood
Policy’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 14, no.3, pp.519—551.
Brzeziński, Z 1997a, ‘Geostrategy for Eurasia’, Foreign Affairs, vol.76, no.5, pp.50-64.
Brzeziński, Z 1997b, The grand chessboard: American primacy and its geopolitical
imperatives, Basic Books, New York.
Brzeziński, Z 2009, The choice: global domination or global leadership, Basic Books,
New York.
Brzeziński, Z 2013, Strategic vision: America and the crisis of global power, Basic Books,
New York.
Brzeziński, Z 2016, ‘Towards a global realignment’, The American Interest, 17 April.
Brzeziński, Z 2017, ‘How to address strategic insecurity in a turbulent age’, The Hufftngton
Post, 3 January.
Brzeziński, Z and Mearsheimer, JJ 2005, ‘Clash of the titans’, Foreign Policy, vol. 146,
no.l, pp.46-49.
Bugajski, J and Doran, PB 2016, ‘Black Sea rising: Russia’s strategy in Southeast Europe’,
Center for European Policy Analysis, February.
Bundesbank 1978, ‘EMS: Bundesbank Council meeting with Chancellor Schmidt
(assurances on operation of EMS) [declassified 2008]’, Bundesbank Archives, N2/267,
30 November.
Burrett, T 2014, ‘National interests versus national pride: the Russo-Japanese Northern
Territories dispute’, Problems of Post-Communism, vol.61, no.5, pp. 14-31.
Bibliography 165
Burrows, M and Manning, RA 2015, ‘Kissinger’s nightmare: how an inverted US-China-
Russia may be a game-changer’, Valdai Paper, no.33, 9 November
Bush, G 1992, ‘State of the Union speech’, White House, 28 January.
Buzan, B 1984, ‘Economic structure and international security: the limits of the liberal
case’, International Organization, vol.38, no.4, pp.597—624.
Buzan, B 2005, ‘The security dynamics of a 1+4 world’, in E Aydinli and JN Rosenau
(eds), Globalization, security, and the nation state: paradigms in transition, State
University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 177—198.
Buzan, B 2010, ‘China in international society: is “peaceful rise” possible?’, The Chinese
Journal of International Politics, vol.3, no. 1, pp.5—36.
Byrd, W and Raiser, M 2006, ‘Economic cooperation in the wider Central Asia region’,
World Bank, Washington.
Cameron, F 2010, ‘The politics of EU-Russia energy relations’, EV-Russia Energy
Relations. OGEL collection, Euroconfidential, pp.25—38.
Campi, A 2014, ‘How expanding trans-border transportation networks will impact South
Korean-Mongolian energy cooperation’, Korea Economic Institute of America,
22 January.
Carlsson, M, Oxenstierna, S and Weissmann, M 2015, ‘China and Russia — a study on
cooperation, competition and distrust’, Swedish Ministry of Defence, June.
Carpenter, TG 1992, A search for enemies: America’s alliances after the Cold War, Cato
Institute, Washington DC.
Cazacu, A 2015, ‘The future of Russia-Japan relations’, Center for Strategic and
International Studies, 2 September.
Cecchini, P 1988, The European challenge 1992: the benefits of a single market, Wildwood
House, Aldershot.
Cella, G 2015, ‘Russian-Greek relations: Moscow’s pivot to Eastern Europe?’, ISPI,
no.285, May.
Cenusa, D, Emerson, M, Kovziridse, T and Movchan, V 2014, ‘Russia’s punitive trade
policy measures towards Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia’, CEPS Working Document,
no.400, September.
Cesaratto, S 2010, ‘Europe, German mercantilism and the current crisis’, n.595, Department
of Economics, University of Siena.
Chandran, N 2015, ‘Is the dollar losing its clout among Ems?’, CNBC, 9 March.
Chang, L 2015, ‘China three gorges, En+ eye projects in Russia’, China Daily Asia,
30 October.
Chaudhury, DR 2014, ‘Russia and India have a huge potential of bilateral trade and
economic cooperation: Vladimir Putin’, The Economic Times, 10 December.
Chazan, G and Buckley, N 2013, ‘A cap on Gazprom’s ambitions’, Financial Times, 5 June.
Cheng, JYS 2009, ‘Chinese perceptions of Russian foreign policy during the Putin
Administration: U.S.-Russia relations and “strategic triangle” considerations’, Journal
of Current Chinese Affairs, vol.8, no.2, pp. 145—168.
Cheng, JYS 2015, ‘The Afghanistan situation and China’s new approach to the SCO’,
Asian Survey, vol.55, no.2, pp.346-370.
Chizhov, V 2004, ‘European Union: a partnership strategy’, International Affairs, A
Russian Journal of World Politics, Diplomacy and International Relations, vol.50,
no.6, pp.79-87.
Chomsky, N 2016, Who rules the world?, Macmillan, New York.
Choudhury, S 2016, ‘Russia’s Rosneft leads group buying India’s essar oil’, The Wall
Street Journal, 14 October.
166 Bibliography
Chugrov, S 2005, ‘Russia and Japan: a failed breakthrough’, Russia in Global Affairs,
vol.3, no.3, pp. 109-120.
Clark, G 2005, ‘ Japan-Russia dispute over northern territories highlights flawed diplomacy’,
The Asia-Pacific Journal, vol.3, no.4, 27 April.
Clarke, M 2008, ‘China’s integration of Xinjiang with Central Asia: securing a “Silk Road”
to great power status’, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, vol.6, no.2, pp.89—111.
Clinton, HR 2014, Hard choices: a memoir, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Connolly, R 2016, ‘The Empire strikes back: economic statecraft and the securitisation of
political economy in Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol.68, no.4, pp.750-773.
Contessi, NP 2010, ‘China, Russia and the leadership of the SCO: a Tacit Deal Scenario’,
China Eurasia Forum Quarterly, vol.8, no.4, pp. 101-123.
Cooley, A 2015, ‘New Silk Route or developmental cul-de-sac?’, Ponars Eurasia, memo
no.372, July.
Cooper, RN 1968, The economics of interdependence: economic policy in the Atlantic
community, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cooper, HBH 2000, ‘Market development potential for the commodity cargo transport between
Alaska, Canada and the Northern Tier’, Alaska-Canada Rail Link Conference, 20 January.
Cornett, PG 2016, ‘China’s “New Silk Road” and US-Japan alliance geostrategy:
challenges and opportunities’, Center for Strategic and International Studies, vol.16,
no. 10, pp.1-20.
Cwik, PF 2011, ‘The new neo-mercantilism: currency manipulation as a form of protectionism’,
Economic Affairs, vol.31, no.3, pp.7—11.
Daly, JCK 2014a, ‘Was Russia’s Crimea annexation a move against China?’, Silk Road
Reporters, 13 May.
Daly, JCK 2014b, ‘Russia lifts arms embargo to sell helicopters to Pakistan’, Eurasian
Daily Monitor, vol. 11, no. 114, 24 June.
Damro, C 2012, ‘Market power Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 19,
no.5, pp.682-699.
Damro, C 2015, ‘Market power Europe: exploring a dynamic conceptual framework’,
Journal of European Public Policy, vol.22, no.9, pp. 1336-1354.
Das, G and Thomas, CJ 2016, Look East to act East policy: implications for India s
Northeast, Routledge, New York.
De Wilde, JH 2007, ‘The poverty of EU centrism’, Sixth Pan-European IR conference of
the ECPR/SGIR Torino, Workshop 12: Post-Modern Foreign and Security Policy in the
Enlarged European Union, 12-15 September.
Dehghan, SK 2016, ‘China’s Silk Road revival steams ahead as cargo train arrives in Iran’,
The Guardian, 16 February.
Deng, Y 2014, ‘China: the post-responsible power’, The Washington Quarterly, vol.37,
no.4, pp. 117-132.
Diesen, G 2015, EU and NATO relations with Russia: after the collapse of the Soviet
Union, Routledge, New York.
Diesen, G 2016a, ‘Putin: Russia’s last “pro-Western” alternative’, The Interpreter, 7 June.
Diesen, G 2016b, ‘Russia’s pivot to Asia: constructing a Eurasian State in a multipolar
world’, in D Gopal and D Ahlawat (eds), Indo-Pacific: emerging powers, evolving
regions and challenges to global governance, Aakar, New Dehli.
Diesen, G 2016, ‘Russia’s withdrawal from Syria: Mission accomplished?’, The Interpreter,
16 March.
Diez, T 1999, ‘Speaking “Europe”: the politics of integration discourse’, Journal of European
Public Policy, vol.6, no.4, pp.598-613.
Bibliography 167
Dong, L and Lia Z 2015, ‘US “miscalculated” on AIIB: Albright’, China Daily, 4 January.
Downs, ES 2010, ‘Sino-Russian Energy relations, an uncertain courtship’, in J Bellacqua
(ed.), The future of China-Russia relations, University of Kentucky Press, Kentucky,
pp.146-175.
Dulles, JF 1952, ‘Security in the Pacific’, Foreign Affairs, vol.30, no.2, pp. 175-187.
DW 2016, ‘Steinmeier criticizes NATO “saber-rattling”’, DW, 18 June.
Eberlein, B and Grande, E 2005, ‘Beyond delegation: transnational regulatory regimes and
the EU regulatory state’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol.12, no.l, pp.89—112.
Eder, TS 2013, China-Russia relations in Central Asia: energy policy, Beijing s new
assertiveness and 21st Century Geopolitics, Springer, Wiesbaden.
Edwards, J and Kemp, J 2006, ‘Russia’s wrong direction: what the United States can and
should do: report of an independent task force’, Council on Foreign Relations Press, no.57.
Egorov, B 2015, ‘Russia and India may create a joint satellite system’, Russia Beyond the
Headlines, 20 October.
Eichengreen, B 2011, Exorbitant privilege: the rise and fall of the dollar and the future of
the international monetary system, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Eisemann, J, Heginbotham, E and Mitchell, D 2015, China and the developing world:
Beijing s strategy for the twenty-first century, Routledge, New York.
Elleman, BA, Nichols, MR and Ouimet, MJ 1998, ‘A historical réévaluation of America’s
role in the Kuril Islands dispute’, Pacific Affairs, vol.71, no.4, pp.489-504.
Ellman, M 2006, Russia s oil and natural gas: bonanza or curse?, Anthem Press, London.
Emerson, M 2001, The elephant and the bear: the European Union, Russia and their Near
Abroads, CEPS, Brussels.
Ercolani, G and Sciascia, L 2011, ‘Keeping security and peace: behind the strategicalization
of NATO’s “Critical Security Discourse’”, The Journal of Security Strategies,
issue. 14, pp.43-85.
ET 2016, ‘India, Russia to study building $25 billion pipeline’, The Economic Times,
16 October.
EurActiv 2010, ‘Russia launches “geopolitical” oil pipeline to Asia’, EurActiv, 12 January.
Eurasianet 2007, ‘Central Asia: SCO leaders focus on energy, security, cooperation’,
Eurasianet, 15 August.
European Commission 2003, ‘Wider Europe — neighbourhood: a new framework for
relations with our Eastern and Southern neighbours’, Brussels, 11 March.
European Commission, 2006a, ‘An external policy to serve europe’s energy interests,
paper from Commission/SG/HR for the European Council’, SI60/06, 18 June.
European Commission 2006b, ‘Communication from the Commission to the Council and
the European Parliament on strengthening the European neighbourhood policy’,
COM(2006)726Final, Brussels, 4 December.
European Commission 2008, Eastern Partnership: commission staff working document
accompanying the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament
and the Council, COM(2008) 823, 3 December.
European Commission 2010, ‘Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive
growth’, Brussels, 3 March.
European Commission 2015, ‘Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy: Joint
Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and
Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions’, European Commission, Brussels,
18 November.
European Council 2008, Extraordinary European Council, revised version of the Presidency
Conclusions, 12594/2/08, Brussels, 6 October.
168 Bibliography
European Council 2010, Joint statement on the Partnership for Modernisation, EU-Russia
summit, Rostov-on-Don, 1 June.
European Council 2013, ‘Joint declaration of the Eastern Partnership summit’, Council of
the European Union, Vilnius, 29 November.
Evans-Pritchard 2016, ‘Euro “house of cards” to collapse, warns ECB prophet’, The
Telegraph, 16 October.
Farage, N 2015, Speech at the European Parliament, Strasbourg, 7 October.
Fallon, T 2015, ‘The New Silk Road: Xi Jinping’s grand strategy for Eurasia’, American
Foreign Policy Interests, vol.37, no.3, pp. 140-147.
Farchy, J 2016, ‘New Silk Road will transport laptops and frozen chicken’, Financial
Times, 10 May.
Fasslabend, W 2015, ‘The Silk Road: apolitical marketing concept for world dominance’,
European View, vol. 14, no.2, pp.293-302.
Federov, G 2016, ‘Russian automobiles to have free access to ASEAN via Vietnam - EEU
Minister’, Russia Behind the Headlines, 8 August.
Feldstein, M 2012, ‘The failure of the euro’, Foreign Affairs, vol.91, no.l, pp. 105—116.
Ferguson, JP 2003, ‘Russia’s role on the Korean Peninsula and great power relations in
Northeast Asia’, NBR Analysis, vol.14, no.l, pp.33-50.
Ferguson, JP 2007, ‘Japanese strategic thinking toward Russia’, in G Rozman, K Togo
and JP Ferguson (eds), Japanese strategic thought toward Asia, Palgrave Macmillan,
New York, pp.201—224.
Femquest, J 2016, ‘Weapons plant in Thailand: Russia offers to build’, Bangkok Post,
26 February.
Fetter, S and Schneider, E 2015, ‘The New York Times was wrong; Russian uranium deals
don’t threaten world supply security’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 19 May.
Filippov, D 2014, ‘The Ukrainian crisis and Japan’s dilemma’, East Asia Forum, 26 March.
Finn, P 2005, ‘Chinese, Russian militaries to hold first joint drills’, The Washington Post,
15 August.
Fischer, S 2016, ‘Nord Stream 2: trust in Europe’, Policy Perspectives, vol.4, no.4, March.
Fisenko, AI, Khamaza, EV, Khamaza, EA, Khamaza, IO and Megei ES 2015, ‘Seaports of
Primorsky Krai in the Transport System of the region in the conditions of the free port
of Vladivostok’, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol.8, no. 10, pp.l—15.
Friedberg, A 201 LA contest for supremacy: China, America, and the struggle for mastery
in Asia, W.W. Norton Company, New York.
Foster, P 2016, ‘Russia accused of clandestine funding of European parties as US conducts
major review of Vladimir Putin’s strategy’, The Telegraphy 16 January.
Francis, D 2016, ‘The IMF chief warns Greece can’t meet terms of its debt deal’, Foreign
Policy, 15 April.
Friedman, TL 1998, ‘Foreign Affairs: Now a word from X’, The New York Times, 2 May.
Friedman, G 2014, ‘The geopolitics of the United States, Part 1: The inevitable Empire,
Stratfor, 4 July.
Friedman, G 2015, ‘Coming to terms with the American Empire’, Stratfor, 14 April.
Fukuyama, F 1989, ‘The end of history?’, The National Interest, no. 16, pp.3-18.
Gabuev, A 2015a, ‘Another BRIC(S) in the great wall’, Carnegie Moscow Center, 7 July.
Gabuev, A 2015b, ‘Taming the dragon: how can Russia benefit from China’s financial
ambitions in the SCO?’, Russia in Global Affairs, 19 March.
Gabuev, A 2015c, ‘Eurasian Silk Road union: towards a Russia-China consensus?’, The
Diplomat, 5 June.
Bibliography 169
Gabuev, A 2015d, ‘Smiles and waves: what Xi Jinping took away from Moscow’, Carnegie
Moscow Center, 29 May.
Gabuev, A 2016, ‘Friends with benefits? Russian-Chinese relations after the Ukraine
crisis’, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 29 June.
Gaddis, JL 2005, Strategies of containment: a critical appraisal of American National
security policy during the Cold War, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
García-Herrero, A and Xu, J 2016, ‘The China-Russia trade relationship and its impact on
Europe’, Bruegel, Issue 4, 14 July.
Gatev, I and Diesen, G 2016, ‘Eurasian encounters: the Eurasian Economic Union and the
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation’, European Politics and Society, vol.17, pp. 133—150.
Geeraerts, G 2011, ‘China, the EU, and the new multipolarity’, European Review, vol.19,
no.l, pp.57-67.
German Federal Ministiy of Defence 2011, ‘Defence policy guidelines: safeguarding
national interests - assuming international responsibility — shaping security together’,
German Ministry of Defence, Berlin, 27 May.
Geun-Hye, P 2011, ‘New kind of Korea: building trust between Seoul and Pyongyang’,
Foreign Affairs, vol.90, no.5, pp. 13—18.
Gilpin, R 1975, US Power and the multinational corporation, Basic Books, New York.
Gilpin, R 2011, Global political economy: understanding the international economic
order, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Gleason, G 2003, ‘Russia and the politics of the Central Asian electricity grid’, Problems
of Post-Communism, vol.50, no.3, pp.42-52.
Goldberg, J 2016, ‘The Obama doctrine’, The Atlantic, April Issue.
Goldstein, L and Kozyrev, V 2006, ‘China, Japan and the scramble for Siberia’, Survival,
vol.48, no.l, pp. 163-178.
Goltz, JK 1995, ‘The Sea of Okhotsk peanut hole: how the United Nations Draft Agreement
on straddling stocks might preserve the Pollack fishery’, Pacific Rim Law Policy
Association, vol.4, no.2, pp.443-478.
Gordon, MR 2002, ‘Iraq said to plan tangling US in street fighting’, New York Times,
20 August.
Gorenburg, D 2012, ‘The Southern Kuril Islands dispute’, Ponars Eurasia, no.226.
Gowan, P 2002, The new American century?, Spokesman Publisher, Nottingham.
Grandhi, K 2016, ‘India surpasses China to become fastest growing economy in the world’,
International Business Times, 9 February.
Grant, C 2012, ‘Russia, China and global governance’, Centre for European Reform, London.
Greenwald, G and MacAskill, E 2013, ‘Obama orders US to draw up overseas target list for
cyber-attacks’, The Guardian, 8 June.
Greenwood, T 1993, ‘NATO’s future’, European Security, vol.2, no.l, pp.l—14.
Gresh, GF 2010, ‘Traversing the Persian gauntlet: US naval projection and the Strait of
Hormuz’, Fletcher Forum for World Affairs, vol.34, no.l, pp.41—56.
Grigoryan, A 2015, ‘Iran-Armenia railway project and Russian geopolitics’, Eurasia Daily
Monitor, vol.2, no.20, 2 February.
Guardian 2013, ‘Syria intervention plan fuelled by oil interests, not chemical weapon
concern’, The Guardian, 31 August.
Gueldry, M and Liang, W 2016, ‘China’s global energy diplomacy: behavior normalization
through economic interdependence or resource neo-mercantilism and power politics?’,
Journal of Chinese Political Science, vol.21, no.2, pp.217—240.
Guldi, J 2012, Roads to power: Britain invents the infrastructure state, Harvard University
Press, Cambridge.
17 0 Bibliography
Guschin, A 2015, China, Russia and the tussle for influence in Kazakhstan’, The Diplomat,
23 March.
Gusev, A and Westphal, K 2015, ‘Russian energy policies revisited: assessing the impact
of the crisis in Ukraine on Russian energy policies and specifying the implications for
German and EU energy policies’, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, pp.1-54.
Guzzini, S 1997, Robert Gilpin: the realist quest for the dynamics of power’, in IB Neumann
and О Wæver (eds), The future of international relations, Routledge, London, pp. 129-154.
Gvosdev, N 2008, ‘Parting with illusions: developing a realistic approach to relations with
Russia’, CATO Institute, 29 February.
Haider, Z 2005, Baluchis, Beijing, and Pakistan’s Gwadar Port’, Georgetown Journal of
International Affairs, vol.6, no.l, pp.95—103.
Halligan, L 2014a, The dollar’s 70-year dominance is coming to an end’, The Telegraph,
19 July.
Halligan, L 2014b, India’s star rises out ofQE taper tantrum’, The Telegraph, 13 December.
Hanif, M 2013, Pakistan-Russia relations: progress, prospects and constraints’, IPRI Journal,
vol.13, no.2, pp.63-86.
Harding, G 2016, ‘Euroscepticism: the EU’s new normal’, EUObserver, 9 June.
Haukkala, H 2005, The relevance of norms and values in the EU’s Russia policy, Finnish
Institute of International Affairs, UPI Working Paper no.52, pp.l—22.
Haukkala, H 2010, The EU-Russia strategic partnership: the limits of post-sovereignty in
international relations, Routledge, London.
Heckscher, E 1955, Mercantilism, George Allen and Unwin, London.
Heep, S 2014, China in global finance: domestic financial repression and international
financial power, Springer, London.
Heilman, S, Rudolf, M, Huotari, M and Buckow, J 2014, China’s shadow foreign policy:
parallel structures challenge the established international order’, Meries, 28 October.
Henderson, J 2011, The pricing debate over Russia gas exports to China’, Oxford Institute
for Energy Studies, Working Paper NG-56, Oxford.
Henni, A 2014, ‘Gas for cash: the future of Turkmenistan’, Society of Petroleum Engineers,
11 November.
Hersh, S 2007, The redirection’, The New Yorker, 5 March.
Herszenhom, DM and Buckley, C 2013, China’s new leader, visiting Russia, promotes
nations, economic and military ties’, The New York Times, 22 March.
Hettne, B 1993, Neo-mercantilism: the pursuit of regionness’, Cooperation and Conflict,
vol.28, no.3, pp.211-232.
Hettne, B and Sõderbaum, F 2000, Theorising the rise of regionness’, New Political
Economy, vol.J, no.3, pp.457—472.
Higgins, A 2016, ‘An unfinished bridge, and partnership, between Russia and China’, The
New York Times, 16 July.
Hille, K 2014, ‘Russia and China plan own rating agency to rival western players’,
Financial Times, 3 June.
Hille, K 2015, ‘Moscow seeks to unlock Chinese financing for Russian companies’,
Financial Times, 7 May.
Hilmola, OP andHenttu, V 2015, ‘Border-crossing constraints, railways and transit transports
in Estonia’, Research in Transportation Business Management, vol.14, pp.72-79.
Hilpert, HG and Wacker, G 2015, ‘Geoeconomics meets geopolitics: China’s new economic
and foreign policy initiatives’, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, June, pp.l—7.
Hirschman, A 1945, National power and the structure of foreign trade, University of
California Press, Berkeley.
Bibliography 171
Hirschman, A 1978, ‘Beyond asymmetiy: critical notes on myself as a young man and on
some other old friends’, International Organisation, vol.32, no.l, pp.45-50.
Hilary, J 2016, ‘After the leaks showed what it stands for, could this be the end for TTIP?’,
The Independent, 2 May.
Hoff, B 2016, ‘Hillary emails reveal true motive for Libya intervention’, Foreign Policy
Journal, 6 January.
Holodny, E 2014, ‘India’s Modi: “Russia is India’s closest friend’”, Business Insider,
12 December.
Holslag, J 2006, ‘China’s new mercantilism in Central Africa’, African and Asian Studies,
vol.5, no.2, pp. 133-169.
Hughes, J 2007, ‘EU relations with Russia: partnership or asymmetric interdependency?’,
in N Casarini and C Musu (eds), European foreign policy in an evolving international
system, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp.76—94.
Hughes, CW 2009, ‘Japan’s response to China’s rise: regional engagement, global
containment, dangers of collision’, International Affairs, vol.85, no.4, pp.837-856.
Huntington, SP 1978, ‘Trade, technology and leverage: economic diplomacy’, Foreign
Policy, no.32, pp.63-106.
Huntington, SP 1993, ‘Why international primacy matters’, International Security, vol.17,
no.4, pp.68-83.
Huntington, SP 1999, ‘The lonely superpower’, Foreign Affairs, vol.87, no.2, pp.35-49.
Huntington, SP 2004, ‘Dead souls: The denationalization of the American elite’, The
National Interest, pp.5-18.
Huotari, M and Heep, S 2015, ‘Learning geoeconomics: China’s experimental financial
and monetary initiatives’, Asia Europe Journal, vol.14, no.2, pp. 153—171.
Hurrell, A 1995, ‘Explaining the resurgence of regionalism in world politics’, Review of
International Studies, vol.21, no.4, pp.331—358.
Hyde-Price, A 2006, ‘“Normative” power Europe: a realist critique’, Journal of European
Public Policy, vo!.13, no.2, pp.217-234.
Hyer, E 2015, The pragmatic dragon: China’s grand strategy and boundary settlements,
UBC Press, Toronto.
Hyodo, S 2014, ‘Russia’s security policy towards East Asia’, in T Akaha and A
Vassilieva (eds), Russia and East Asia: informal and gradual integration, Routledge,
London, pp.44-54.
Iglauer, P 2014, ‘Eastern interest in Eurasian economic deal’, Asia Times, 11 June.
Ikenberry, GJ 2008, ‘The rise of China and the future of the West: can the liberal system
survive?’, Foreign Affairs, vol.87, no.l, pp.23—37.
Inozemtsev, V 2013, ‘More respect for Russia would go a long way’, The Moscow Times,
29 March.
IP Commission 2013, ‘The IP Commission Report: the commission of theft of American
intellectual property’, The Nationals Bureau of Asian Research, May.
Isidore, C 2013, ‘China not impressed by U.S. debt deal’, CNN Money, 18 October.
Ivanov, I 2015, ‘The sunset of Greater Europe’, Speech at the 20th Annual International
Conference of the Baltic Forum ‘The US, the EU and Russia - the New Reality’, 12
September, Riga.
Jančič, D 2016, ‘The role of the European Parliament and the US Congress in shaping
Transatlantic relations: TTIP, NSA surveillance, and CIA renditions’, Journal of Common
Market Studies, vol.54, no.4, pp.896—912.
Jeh, SH, Min, J, Kang, B and Lukonin, S 2015, ‘Recent development in the Russian Far East-
Baikal region and its implication’, KlEP World Economy Update, vol.15, no. 17, pp.1-6.
172 Bibliography
Jones, RB 1986, Conflict and control in the world economy: contemporary economic
realism and neo-mercantilism, Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton.
Joo, SH 2014, ‘Russia’s policy on nuclear proliferation and national unification on the
Korean peninsula’, Pacific Focus, vol.29, no.2, 167-187.
Judicial Watch 2015, ‘JW v DOD and state 14-812’, Judicial Watch, 18 May.
Juhasz, A 2014, The Bush agenda: invading the world one economy at a time, HarperCollins
Publishers, New York.
Kaczmarski, M 2015, Russia-China relations in the post-crisis international order,
Routledge, New York.
Kaczmarski, M 2016, ‘The asymmetric partnership quest; Russia’s turn to China’,
International Politics, vol.53, no.3, pp.415—434.
Kaczmarski, M and Kardas, S 2016, “‘The oil friendship”: the state of and prospects for
Russian-Chinese energy cooperation’, OSW Commentary, 17 February.
Kamalakaran, A 2015, ‘Why Russia will not return the Southern Kurils to Japan’, Russia
Beyond the Headlines, 11 June.
Kaplan, RD 2012, The revenge of geography: what the map tells us about coming conflicts
and the battle against fate, Random House, New York.
Karaganov S 2010, ‘The past year and the upcoming decade’ (in Russian: Proshedshij god
i predstoyashyee, desyatiletie), Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 15 January.
Karaganov, S 2015a, ‘Eurasian way out of the European crisis’, Russia in Global Affairs, 8 June.
Karaganov, S 2015b, ‘Toward the great Ocean-3 creating central Eurasia: The Silk Road
economic belt and the priorities of the Eurasian states’ joint development’, Valdai
Discussion Club, Moscow, June.
Karaganov, S 2016a, ‘The world is in a pre-war state’, Russia in Global Affairs, 26 February.
Karaganov, S 2016b, ‘Global challenges and Russia’s foreign policy’, Strategic Analysis,
vol.40, no.6, pp.461^173.
Kashin, V 2013, ‘The sum total of all fears’, Russia in Global Affairs, 15 April.
Katusa, M 2014, The Colder War: how the global energy trade slipped from America’s
grasp, John Wiley Sons, Hoboken.
Katzenstein, PJ 2005, A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium,
Cornell University Press, London.
Kaura, V 2015, ‘India and Iran: challenges and opportunity’, The Diplomat, 11 September.
Kaveshnikov, N 2003, ‘EU-Russia relations: how to overcome the deadlock of mutual
misunderstanding?’, Institute of Europe, Moscow.
Kazmin, A 2016, ‘India watches anxiously as Chinese influence grows’, Financial Times,
10 May.
Keating, D 2012, ‘Commissioner urges EU to face down Russia on energy’, Europeanvoice,
11 October.
Keck, Z 2014, ‘Russia accelerates Asia pivot’, The Diplomat, 18 April.
Kellner, D 2004, ‘Preemptive strikes and the war on Iraq: a critique of Bush administration
unilateralism and militarism’, New Political Science, vol.26, no.3, pp.417-^140.
Kennan, G 1948, ‘Report by the policy planning staff, US Department of State, 24 February.
Kennedy, P 1987, The rise andfall of the great powers, Random House, New York.
Kennedy, RF 2016, ‘Why the Arabs don’t want us in Syria’, Politico, 23 February.
Keohane, R and Nye, J 2001, Power and interdependence, Longman, New York.
Kettenacker, L 2000, ‘Britain and German unification, 1989/90’, in K Larres and E Meehan
(eds), Uneasy allies: British-German relations and European integration since 1945:
British-German relations and European integration since 1945, Oxford University
Press, Oxford, pp.99-125.
Bibliography 173
Keukeleire, S and Hooijmaaijers, B 2014, ‘The BRICS and other emerging power alliances
and multilateral organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: challenges for
the European Union and its view on multilateralism’, Journal of Common Market
Studies, vol.52, no.3, pp.582—599.
Khabar 2015, ‘The next provincial relations, Iran, China and Russia, explained China’s
readiness to build more power plants in Iran’, Khabar Online.
Khabarovsk 2016, ‘The new international transport corridor will be in the region (in
Russian: Novij mezhdunarodnij transportnij koridor poyavitsya v krae), Official site of
the Khabarovsk Territory Government, 29 August.
Khalaji, M and Nadimi, F 2016, ‘Russia uses an Iranian air base: Two Essays’, The
Washington Institute, 17 August.
Khurana, GS 2008, ‘China’s “String of Pearls” in the Indian Ocean and its security
implications’, Strategic Analysis, vol.32, no.l, pp.l—39.
Kilby, C 2009, ‘The political economy of conditionality: An empirical analysis of World
Bank loan disbursements’, Journal of Development Economics, vol.89, no.l, pp.51—61.
Kim, T 2009, ‘Impassive to Imperial? Russia in Northeast Asia from Yeltsin to Putin’, in
VK Aggarwal, MG Koo, S Lee and C Moon (eds), Northeast Asia: ripe for integration,
Springer, Berlin, pp.l79-212.
Kim, SH 2015, ‘The day after: ROK-US cooperation for Korean unification’, The
Washington Quarterly, vol.38, no.3, pp.37—58.
Kim, Y and Indeo, F 2013, ‘The new great game in central Asia post 2014: The US “New
Silk Road” strategy and Sino-Russian rivalry’, Communist and Post-Communist
Studies, vol.46, no.2, pp.275—286.
Kimura, H 2008, The Kurillian knot: a history of Japanese-Russian border negotiations,
Stanford University Press, California.
Kindleberger, CP 1986, The world in depression, 1929-1939 (Vol. 4), University of
California Press, Berkeley.
King, C 2004, The Black Sea: a history, Oxford University Press, New York.
Kireeva, A 2012, ‘Russia’s East Asia policy: new opportunities and challenges’, Perception,
vol. 17, no.4, pp.49-78.
Kirshner, J 2013, ‘Bringing them all back home? dollar diminution and US power’, The
Washington Quarterly, vol.36, no.3, pp.27—45.
Kissinger, H 2012, On China, Penguin Publishing, New York.
Kissinger, H 2014, ‘Henry Kissinger on the assembly of a New World Order’, The Wall
Street Journal, 29 August.
Kissinger, H 2015, ‘The interview: Henry Kissinger’, The National Interest, 19 August.
Kitchen, N 2010, ‘Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: a neoclassical realist model of
grand strategy formation’, Review of International Studies, vol.36, no.l, pp.l 17—143.
Klein, Y 1996, ‘Obstructive or promoting? British views on German unification 1989/90’,
German Politics, vol.5, no.3, pp.404-431.
Klein, M 2014, ‘Russia: a Euro-Pacific power?’, SWP Research Paper, Berlin, pp.1-37.
Kleveman, L 2003, The new Great Game: blood and oil in Central Asia, Atlantic Books,
London.
Knorr, K 1977, ‘International economic leverage and its uses’, Economic Issues and
National Security, University Press of Kansas, Kansas.
Koh, GQ 2015, ‘China, Russia agree to jointly build hydropower plant - Xinhua’, Reuters,
10 May.
Kommersant 2016, ‘It is time to put an effective barrier to information war’ (in Russian:
Pora postavit dejstvennij zaslon informatsionnoj vojne), Kommersant, 18 April.
174 Bibliography
Korablinov, A 2016,‘Sino-Russian JV established for trans-Amur bridge’, Russia Beyond
the Headlines, 7 April.
Kramer, AE 2006, ‘Shell cedes control of Sakhalin-2 to Gazprom’, The New York Times,
21 December.
Krefit, H 2006, ‘China’s quest for energy’, Policy Review, vol.139, pp.61-71.
Kremlin 2014, ‘Address by President of the Russian Federation’, Kremlin, 18 March.
Krugman, P 2013, ‘Those depressing Germans’, The New York Times, 3 November.
Krylov, M 2016, ‘Is a new Japanese-Russian rapprochement in the air?, Carnegie Moscow
Center, 19 May.
Kučerová, I 2014, ‘The economic regionalism and its linguistic aspects, the model of
inside-outside regionalism’, AALPI, pp.93-107.
Kuchins, AC 2014, ‘Russia and the CIS in 2013: Russia’s pivot to Asia’, Asian Survey,
vol.54, no.l, pp. 129—137.
Kuchins, AC 2016, ‘The end of the end of history’. Strategic Analysis, vol.40,
no.6, pp.458-460.
Kuchins, AC, Sanderson, TM and Gordon, DA 2010, ‘Afghanistan: building the missing
link in the modem silk road’, The Washington Quarterly, vol.33, no.2, pp.33-47.
Kuhrt, NC 2012, ‘The Russian Far East in Russia’s Asia policy: dual integration or double
periphery?’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol.64, no.3, pp.471-493.
Kuhrt, NC 2014, ‘Russia and Asia-Pacific: from “competing” to “complementary”
regionalisms?’, Politics, vol.34, no.2, pp. 138-148.
Kundnani, H 2011, ‘Germany as a geo-economic power’, The Washington Quarterly,
vol.34, no.3, pp.31—45.
Kundnani, H and Parello-Plesner, J 2012, ‘China and Germany: why the emerging special
relationship matters for Europe’, Policy Brief 55, European Council on Foreign
Relations, May.
Kupchan, CA 2012, ‘The world in 2050: when the 5 largest economies are the BRICs and
US’, The Atlantic, 17 February.
Lane, D 2008, ‘The Orange Revolution: “People’s Revolution” or revolutionary coup?’,
The British Journal of Politics International Relations, vol. 10, no. 4, pp.525-549.
Lane, D 2016, ‘Post-socialist regions in the world system’, European Politics and Society,
17, pp.46-66.
Laruelle, M 2015, ‘Dangerous liaisons: Eurasianism, the European Far Right, and Putin’s
Russia’, in M Laruelle (ed.), Eurasianism and the European far right: reshaping the
Europe-Russia relationship, Lexington Books, London.
Lavrov, S 2012, ‘Russia in the 21st-century world of power’, Russia in Global Affairs,
27 December.
Lavrov, S 2013, ‘Towards peace, stability and sustainable economic development in the
Asia Pacific region’, Foreign Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation,
5 October.
Lavrov, S 2014, Speech at the UN General Assembly, 27 September.
Le Corre, P and Sepulchre, A 2016, China’s offensive in Europe, Brookings Institution
Press, Washington.
Lee JY 2004, ‘Iron Silkroad: prospects for a landbridge through Russia from Korea to
Europe’, Post-Soviet Affairs, vol.20, no.l, pp.83—105.
Lee, JS 2015, ‘South Korean perspectives on Northeast Asian energy security cooperation’,
in B Kong and JH Ku (eds). Energy security cooperation in Northeast Asia, Routledge,
New York, pp.86-99.
Bibliography 17 5
Lee, L 2014, ‘Russia’s engagement with India: securing the longevity of a “special and
privileged” strategic partnership’, in 1 Hall (ed.), The engagement of India, Georgetown
University Press, Washington.
Lee, L and Gill, G 2015, ‘India, Central Asia and the Eurasian Union: a new ballgame?’,
India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, vol.71, no.2, pp.l 10-125.
Lenta 2015, ‘Putin offers Belrus and Kazakstan a currency union’ (in Russian: Putin
predlozhil Belorussii i Kazakhstanu balyutnij soyoz), Lenta, 20 March.
Leverett, F and Leverett, HM 2014, ‘The birth of the Petroyuan, Sino-American currency
contestation, and the international monetary system: an institutional perspective on the
political economy of currency choice in international energy markets’, Sino-American
Currency Contestation, and the International Monetary System: An Institutional Perspective
on the Political Economy of Currency Choice in International Energy Markets, 29 September.
Levy, JS and Thompson, WR 2010, ‘Balancing on land and at sea: do states ally against the
leading global power?’, International Security, vol.35, no.l, pp.7-43.
Li, Y 2015, ‘Eurasian integration key to sustainable development, EEC Economic Minister
says’, The Astana Times, 4 February.
List, F 1885, The national system of political economy, Longmans, Green, and Company,
London.
Lo, B 2008, Axis of convenience: Moscow, Beijing, and the new geopolitics, RR Donnelley,
Harrisonburg.
Lo, B 2012, ‘Russia’s Euro-Pacific vision: wishful thinking or realistic prospect’, Valdai
Discussion Club, 26 March.
Lo, C 2015, ‘China’s Silk Road strategy’, The International Economy, vol.29, no.4, pp.54—71.
Lorot, P 1999, ‘Introductionalageoeconomie’, Economica, Paris, quoted in Szabo(2015:84).
Lossan, A 2015, ‘Why the Doing Business ranking is so important for Russia’, Russia
Beyond the Headlines, 20 November.
Lossan, A 2016, ‘Putin promises to set up a science hub in the Russian Far East’, Russia
Beyond the Headlines, 4 September.
Lucarelli, B 2011, ‘German neomercantilism and the European sovereign debt crisis’,
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol.34, no.2, pp.205—224.
Luft, G 2014, ‘Can America stop Russia’s energy “pivot” to Asia?’, The National Interest,
13 May.
Lukin, AV 2011, ‘Should the Shanghai Cooperation Organization be enlarged?’, Russia in
Global Affairs, 22 June.
Lukin, AV 2014, ‘What the Kremlin is thinking: Putin’s vision for Eurasia’, Foreign
Affairs, vol.93, no.4, pp.85-93.
Lukin, A 2015a, ‘Russia’s Eastward drive - pivoting to Asia... or to China?’, Russian
Analytical Digest, no. 169, 30 June.
Lukin, AV 2015b, ‘Shanghai Cooperation Organization: looking for a new role’, Russia in
Global Affairs, 10 July.
Lukin, A 2015c, ‘Eurasian Great Power triangle’, in A Klieman (ed.), Great powers and
geopolitics: international affairs in a rebalancing world, Springer, Ramat-Aviv,
pp.l 83-206.
Lukin, AV 2015d, Russia, China and the emerging Greater Eurasia’, The ASAN Forum,
18 August.
Lukin, AV 2016, ‘Russia’s pivot to Asia: myth or reality?’, Strategic Analysis, vol.40,
no.6, pp.573-589.
Lukin, A and Lee, R 2015, ‘The Russian Far East and the future of Asia security’, Orbis,
vol.59, no.2, pp.l67-180.
176 Bibliography
Lukyanov, F 2012, ‘Why did Medvedev go to the Kurils again?’, Russia in Global Affairs,
5 July.
Lukyanov, F 2013, ‘Russia in BRICS: substantial or instrumental partnership?’, in FA Komegay
and N Bohler-Muller (eds), Laying the BRICS of a New Global Order: from Yekaterinburg
2009 to eThekwini 2013, Africa Institute of South Africa, Pretoria, pp. 119-135.
Luttwak, EN 1990, ‘From geopolitics to geo-economics: logic of conflict, grammar of
commerce’, National Interest, no.20, pp. 19-23.
Luttwak, EN 2010, Endangered American dream, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Lynch, AC 2001, ‘The realism of Russia’s foreign policy’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol.53,
no.l, pp.7—31.
Lynch, D 2003, ‘Russia faces Europe’, Challiot Paper, no.60, Institute for Security
Studies, May.
Lynch, S 2013, ‘Russia warned it might breach Helsinki accord’, The Irish Times, 30 November.
MacFarquhar, N 2014, ‘Russia and 2 neighbors Form Economic Union that has a Ukraine-
size hole’, The New York Times, 29 May.
Mackinder, HJ 1904, ‘The geographical pivot of history’, The Geographical Journal,
vol. 170, no.4, pp.421-444.
Mackinder, HJ 1919, Democratic ideals and reality: a study in the politics ofreconstruction,
Constable, London.
Mahan, AT 2013, The influence of sea power upon history, 1660-1783, Read Books, Boston.
Malcolm, N 1995, ‘The case against “Europe”’, Foreign Affairs, vol.74, no.2, pp.52-68.
Malik, HY 2012, ‘Strategic importance of Gwadar port’, Journal of Political Studies,
vol. 19, no.2, pp.57-69.
Mandiant Report 2013, ‘Exposing one of China’s cyber espionage units’, The National
Security Archive, George Washington University, http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/
NSAEBB424/docs/Cyber-083.pdf [last accessed 5 February 2017].
Mann, M 2005, Incoherent empire, Verso, London.
Martynova, ES 2014,4 Strengthening of cooperation between Russia and ASEAN: rhetoric
or reality?’, Asian Politics Policy, vol.6, no.3, pp.397-412.
Mattich, A 2011, ‘German mercantilism to rescue the Euro’, Wall Street Journal, 28 June.
Mearsheimer, JJ 2009, ‘Reckless states and realism’, International Relations, vol.23, no.2,
pp.241-256.
Mearsheimer, JJ and Walt, SM 2016, ‘The Case for offshore balancing’, Foreign Affairs,
vol.95, no.4, pp.70-83.
Medetsky, A 2016, ‘Putin sparks Russia pork book as import ban expands hog breeding’,
Bloomberg, 4 January.
Medvedev, S 2008, ‘The stalemate in EU-Russia relations: between “sovereignty” and
“Europeanisation”’, in T Hopf (ed.), Russia s European choice, Palgrave Macmillan,
New York.
Medvedev, D 2009, ‘Go Russia!’, Kremlin, 10 September.
Medvedev, D 2012, ‘Integration, development, innovation - in the interest of prosperity’
(in Russian: Integratsiya, v tselyakh razvitiya, innovatsii - v interesakh protsvetaniya),
The Russian Federation, 28 January.
Melyantsou, D 2015, ‘Belarus Foreign Policy Index’, Belarusian Institute for Strategic
Studies, no.25, March-April.
Menon, R 1996, ‘Japan-Russia relations and North-east Asian security’, Survival, vol.38,
no.2, pp.59-78.
Meyer, C 2011, China or Japan: which will lead Asia?, Columbia University Press,
New York.
Bibliography 177
Miller, JB 2014, ‘Building momentum: an imminent Japan-Russia rapprochement?’,
Russia in Global Affairs, no.l, 21 March.
Mi l ward, A 1992, The European rescue of the nation-state, Routledge, London.
Minakir, P 2014, ‘Russia’s economic policy in East Asia’, in T Akaha and A Vassilieva(eds),
Russia and East Asia: informal and gradual integration, Routledge, London, pp.55—88.
Mitrany, D 1965, ‘The prospect of integration: federal or functional’, Journal of Common
Market Studies, vol.4, no.2, pp.l 19—149.
Möller, F 2003, ‘Capitalizing of difference: a security community or/as a Western project’,
Security Dialogue, vol.34, no.3, pp.315—328.
Morgenthau, HJ 1985, Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace, McGraw-
Hill, New York.
Moscow Exchange 2015, ‘China financial futures exchange signs MoU with Moscow
Exchange’, Moscow Exchange, 23 June.
Moscow Times 2014, ‘China to resume investment talk on $10bln port in Crimea’, The
Moscow Times, 29 May.
Mouritzen, H, Waever, O and Wiberg, H 1996, European integration and national
adaptations: a theoretical inquiry, Nova Science Publishers, New York.
Mullett, A 2009, ‘Russia looking to bypass Baltic ports’, Baltic Reports, 14 September.
Munchau, W 2015, ‘Two mistakes that ruined Europe’, Financial Times, 1 November.
Muraviev, A 2011, ‘Shadow of the northern giant: Russia’s current and future engagement
with the Indian Ocean region’, Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, vol.7,
no.2, pp.200-219.
Naoumova, 12015, ‘Liberalization of the electricity market in Russia: the tool of the growing
democracy or dictatorship?’ in Kedia BL and Aceto, K (eds), Emerging Markets and the
Future of the BRIC Nations, Edward Elgar Publishing, Massachusetts, pp.97-110.
Nataraj, G 2015, ‘Why India should join China’s new maritime Silk Road’, The Diplomat,
3 July.
Nation, RC 2000, ‘NATO’s relations with Russia and Ukraine’, US Army War College,
June, pp.1-45.
Neef, C 2016, ‘We are smarter, stronger and more determined’, Der Spiegel, 13 July.
Neuman, M 2010, ‘EU-Russian energy relations after the 2004/2007 EU enlargement: an
EU perspective’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, vol.18, no.3, pp.341—360.
Neumann, IB 1999, Uses of the other: the ‘East’ in European identity formation,
Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Neumann, IB 2005, ‘John Vincent and the English School of international relations’, in IB
Neumann and O Waever (eds), The Future of international relations: masters in the
making, Routledge, New York, pp.38-65.
Neumann, IB 2013, ‘Russia as a Great Power’, in J Hedenskog, V Konnander, B Nygren, I
Oldberg and C Pursiainen, (eds), Russia as a great power: dimensions of security under
Putin, Routledge, New York, pp. 13—28.
New York Times 1992, ‘Excerpts from Pentagon’s plan: “prevent the re-emergence of a
new rival”’, The New York Times, 8 March.
New York Times 2016, ‘Transcript: Donald Trump on NATO, Turkey’s coup attempt and
the world’, The New York Times, 21 July.
Oatley, T and Yackee, J 2004, ‘American interests and IMF lending’, International Politics,
vol.41, no.3, pp.415^429.
Obama, B 2015, ‘State of the Union address’, The White House, 20 Januaiy.
Obama, B 2016, ‘President Obama: “The TPP would let America, not China, lead the way
on global trade”’, The Washington Post, 2 May.
178 Bibliography
Obydenkova, A 2011, ‘Comparative regionalism: Eurasian cooperation and European
integration. The case for neofunctionalism?’, Journal of Eurasian Studies, vol.2,
no.2, pp.87-102.
Ohmae, K 1995, The end of the nation-state: the rise of regional economies, The Free
Press, New York.
Orbân, V 2014, ‘Full text of Viktor Orbân’s speech at Băile Tuşnad (Tusnâdfîirdo) of 26
July 2014’, The Budapest Beacon, 26 July.
Ostroukh, A 2015, ‘Saudi Arabia to Invest up to $10 Billion in Russia’, The Wall Street
Journal, 6 July.
Oreskes, B 2016, ‘Moscow waiy of TTIP talks’, Politico, 9 May.
Osborn, A 2006, ‘Shell cedes control of Sakhalin-2 as Kremlin asserts its iron fist’. The
Independent, 12 December.
Padoa-Schioppa, T 2004, The Euro and its central bank: getting united after the Union,
MIT Press, Cambridge.
Paik, KW 2012, Sino-Russian oil and gas cooperation: the reality and the implications,
Oxford University Library Press, Oxford.
Paik, KW 2014, ‘With China deal, Russia stands at centre of energy geopolitics’, Chatham
House, 23 May.
Paik, KW, 2015, ‘Sino-Russian gas and oil cooperation: entering into a new era of strategic
partnership?’, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, WPM 59, April.
Paik, KW 2016, ‘Development of China-Russia energy cooperation’, The Oxford Institute
for Energy Studies, Erina Conference, 28 January.
Palit, A 2016, ‘India’s Act East policy and implications for Southeast Asia’, Southeast
Asian Affairs, pp.81—91.
Parker, G 1985, Western geopolitical thought in the twentieth century, Routledge,
New York.
Pastukhova, M and Westphal, K 2016, ‘A common energy market in the Eurasian Economic
Union: implications for the European Union and energy relations with Russia’, Stiftung
Wissenschaft und Politik, February, pp.1-8.
Penzev, K 2014, ‘Crimea, China and alterative trade routes’, New Eastern Outlook, 3 July.
Pemin, PG, Nichiporuk, B, Stahl, D, Beck, J and Radaelli-Sanchez, R 2008, ‘Unfolding the
future of the long war: motivations, prospects, and Implications for the U.S. army’,
RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh.
Peyrouse, S 2015, ‘Kyrgyzstan’s membership in the Eurasian Economic Union: a marriage
of convenience?’, Russian Analytical Digest, no. 165, 17 March, pp.10-12.
Pilger, J 2002, ‘How the Bushes bribe the world’, New Statesman, 23 September.
Polyakova, A 2014, ‘Strange bedfellows: Putin and Europe’s Far Right’, World Affairs,
Septem ber/October.
Pomfret, R 2015, ‘Alternative futures for Central Asia’, in DBH Denoon (ed.), China, The
United States, and the future of Central Asia: US-China relations, New York
University Press.
Ponsard, L 2007, Russia, NATO and Cooperative Security: bridging the gap, Routledge.
New York.
Posen, BR 2014, Restraint: a new foundation for US Grand Strategy, Cornell University
Press, London.
Pouliot, V 2010, International security in practice: the politics ofNATO-Russia diplomacy,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Prasad, ES 2016, ‘China’s efforts to expand the international use of the renminbi’.
US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 4 February.
Bibliography 179
PressProject 2016, ‘Clinton emails give away Schauble plans in 2012 - Exclusive
Commentary by Varoufakis’, The PressProject, 22 March.
PressTV 2016, ‘Iran, Pakistan agree to ditch dollar’, PressTV, 31 August.
Prestowitz, C 2012, ‘Mercantilism is a state of mind’, Foreign Policy, 16 April.
Pritchin, S 2015, ‘Energy control room for the whole of Eurasia’, Russia in Global Affairs,
19 March.
Prodi, R 2015, ‘Opening remarks at the Congress of Vienna’, 22 October.
Putin, V 2007, ‘Speech at the 43rd Munich Security Conference’, Kremlin, 10 February.
Putin, V 2011, ‘New integration project for Eurasia: A future bom today’ (in Russian:
Novij integratsionnij proekt dlya Evrazij: budushchee, kotoroe rozhdaetsya segodnya),
Izvestiya, 4 October 2011.
Putin, V 2012, ‘An Asia-Pacific growth agenda’, The Wall Street Journal, 6 September.
Putin, V 2015a, ‘Speech at 70th session of the UN General Assembly’, 28 September.
Putin, V 2015b, ‘Speech at SCO Heads of State Council Meeting’, SCO, 10 July.
Putin, V 2016, ‘Plenary session of St Petersburg International Economic Forum’, 17 June.
Pye, I 2011, ‘The global tug-of-war over Iran’, The Huffington Post, 25 May.
Quigley, C 1979, The evolution of civilizations: An introduction to historical analysis,
Macmillan Company, New York.
Quinn, A 2013, ‘Kenneth Waltz, Adam Smith and the limits of science: hard choices for
neoclassical realism’, International Politics, vol.50, no.2, pp. 159-182.
Rangsimapom, P 2009a, Russia as an aspiring great power in East Asia: perceptions and
policies from Yeltsin to Putin, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Rangsimapom, P 2009b, ‘Russia’s search for influence in Southeast Asia’, Asian Survey,
vol.49, no.5, pp.786—808.
RailPro 2016, ‘Russia and China sign rail agreements’, RailPro, 4 July.
Rastogi, C and Arvis, JF 2014, The Eurasian connection: supply-chain efficiency along the
modern Silk Route through Central Asia, World Bank Publications, Washington.
Rathbun, B 2008, ‘A rose by any other name: neoclassical realism as the logical and
necessary extension of structural realism’, Security Studies, vol.17, no.2, pp.294-321.
Raza, W 2007, ‘European Union trade politics: pursuit of neo-mercantilism in different
flora’, in W Blaas and J Becker (eds), Strategic arena switching in international trade
negotiations, Ashgate, Hampshire, pp.67—96.
Reichwein, A 2012, ‘The tradition of neoclassical realism’, in A Toje and B Kunz (eds),
Neoclassical realism in European politics: bringing power back in, Manchester
University Press, Manchester, pp.30-60.
Republic of Korea 2014, ‘Northeast Asia peace and cooperation initiative’, Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, Seoul.
Republic of Korea 2015, ‘EurAsia initiative’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Seoul.
Rettman, A 2013, ‘D’Estaing: Eurozone should shut its doors after Poland’, EUObserver,
26 March.
Reuters 2013, ‘Developing world oil demand surpasses wealthy nations: ELA’, Reuters, 11 June.
Reuters 2016, ‘Rosatom’s global nuclear ambition cramped by Kremlin politics’, Reuters,
26 June.
RIAC 2012, ‘Russia’s interests in the context of the Asia-Pacific region security and
development’, Russian International Affairs Council, no.l, Moscow, pp. 1-29.
RlAnovosti, 2014, ‘Putin: payments in rubles and yuan are promising, the impact of the
dollar decline’, RIA Novosti, 10 November.
Riley, MA and Vance, A 2012, ‘China corporate espionage boom knocks wind out of U.S.
companies’, Bloomberg, 16 March.
180 Bibliography
Robins-Early, N 2015, ‘Greece’s bailout money doesn’t really end up in Greece’, The
Huffington Post, 6 June.
Rolland, N 2015, ‘China’s new Silk Road’, The National Bureau of Asian Research,
12 February.
Rose, G 1998, ‘Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy9, World Politics, vol.5,
no.l, pp. 144-172.
Rothschild, J 2016, ‘Half-Yearly Financial Report’, RIT Capital Partners pic, 30 June.
Rozman, G 2014, Japan’s response to the Gorbachev era, 1985-1991: a rising superpower
views a declining one, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Rozman, G 2015, ‘The intersection of Russia’s “Turn to the East” and China’s “March to
the West’”, Russian Analytical Digest, no. 169, 30 June.
RT 2008, ‘Putin: We must end monopoly in world finance’, RT, 30 October.
RT 2014, ‘Russia to extend trans-Eurasian rail project to Korea’, RT, 6 June.
RT 2015, ‘Moscow officials “have always and will continue to” visit Russian Kuril Islands
- PM’, RT, 23 August.
RT 2016a, ‘Russia could use Incirlik airbase “if necessary” - Turkish PM’, RT, 21 August.
RT 2016b, ‘Putin encourages Iran to join Russia-led Eurasian alliance’, RT, 5 August.
Rukhadze, V 2016, ‘Russia alters geopolitical balance in South Caucasus with new energy
project’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, vol.13, no.79.
Russian Federation 2003, Energy strategy of Russia to 2020 (in Russian: Energeticheskaya
strategiya rossij na period do 2020), Moscow.
Russian Federation 2005, ‘Road map on the common space of external security’, 10 May,
Moscow.
Russian Federation 2008, ‘Foreign policy concept of the Russian Federation’, Moscow.
Russian Federation 2009a, National security strategy of the Russian Federation to 2020, 12
May, Moscow.
Russian Federation 2009b, ‘Energy strategy of Russia for the period up to 2030’ (in
Russian: Energeticheskaya strategiya Rossii na period do 2030 goda 2009), Moscow,
13 November.
Russian Federation 2010, Opening remarks at a meeting on socio-economic development of the
Far East and cooperation with the Asia-Pacific region (in Russian: Stenograficheskij otchet
o soveshanii po sotsialno-ekonomicheskomu razvitiyu dalnego vostoka i sotrudnichestvu so
stranami aziatsko-tikhookeanskogo regiona), Russian Federation, 2 July.
Russian Federation 2013, ‘Concept of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation’, 12 February.
Russian Federation 2014a, ‘Interview of the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to
ITAR-TASS’, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs ofthe Russian Federation, 10 September.
Russian Federation 2014b, ‘Address by President of the Russian FederationAddress by
President of the Russian Federation’, 18 March.
Russian Federation 2014c, ‘Press statement following Russian-Indian talks’, Russian Federation,
11 December.
Russian Federation 2015a, ‘In conversation with Dmitiy Medvedev: interview with five
television channels’, The Russian Government, 9 December.
Russian Federation 2015b, ‘Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly’, Moscow,
3 December.
Russian Federation 2015c, Plenaiy session of the 19th St Petersburg International Economic
Forum, 19 June.
Sakwa, R 2007, Putin: Russia ’s choice, Routledge, London.
Sakwa, R 2012, ‘The Problem of “the international” in Russian identity formation’,
International Politics, vol.49, no 4, pp.449—465.
Bibliography 181
Sakwa, R 2015, Frontline Ukraine: crisis in the borderlands, IB Tauris, London.
Sakwa, R 2016a, ‘The new globalism: the politics of uncertainty’, Valdai Discussion Club,
9 August.
Sakwa, R 2016b, ‘How the Eurasian elites envisage the role of the EEU in global
perspective’, European Politics and Society, vol.17, pp.4—22.
Satubaldina, A 2015, ‘Over 30 countries interested in signing free trade agreement with
EEU’, Tengri News, 21 July.
Sauga, M, Simons, S and Wiegrefe, K 2010, ‘The price of unity: was the Deutsche Mark
sacrificed for reunification?’, Der Spiegel, 30 September.
Scalingi, PL 1992, ‘US Intelligence in an age of uncertainty: Refocusing to meet the
challenge’, Washington Quarterly, vol.15, no.l, pp. 145—156.
Schelling, TC 1980, The strategy of conflict, Harvard University Press, London.
Scherer, M 2014, ‘Ukrainian employer of Joe Biden’s son hires a D.C. lobbyist’, Time,
7 July.
Scheuermann, C 2013, ‘Interview with Tony Blair: “Leaving Europe would be very bad for
Britain’”, Der Spiegel, 28 January.
Schiff, P 2012, The real crash: how to save yourself and your country, St. Martin’s Press,
New York.
Schmidt, M 2005, ‘Is Putin pursuing a policy of Eurasianism?’, Demokratizatsiya, vol.13,
no.l, pp.87-99.
Schmidt, M 2015, All is moving on the Western Fronts KKETTK Közalapítvány.
Schmoller, G 1897, The mercantile system and its historical significance, Macmillan, London.
Schumacher, T and Nitoiu, C 2015, ‘Russia’s foreign policy towards North Africa in the
wake of the Arab Spring’, Mediterranean Politics, vol.20, no.l, pp.97—104.
Schweller, RL 1999, ‘Realism and the present great power system: growth and positional
conflict over scarce resources’, in EB Kapstein and M Mastanduno (eds), Unipolar
politics: realism and state strategies after the Cold War, Columbia University Press,
New York, pp.28-68.
SCO 2015, ‘VTB: Russian and Chinese companies are moving to settlements in RMB’ (in
Russian: VTB: Kompanii RF i Kitaya perekhodyat na vzaimorascheti v yoanyakh),
SCO Economic Cooperation, 21 May.
Sedghi, A 2015, ‘Russia overtakes Saudi Arabia as largest supplier of oil to China’, The
Guardian, 25 June.
Segal, AM 2014, ‘Cyberspace: the new strategic realm in US-China relations’, Strategic
Analysis, vol.38, no.4, pp.577-581.
Shadrina, E 2016, ‘Can Russia succeed in energy pivoting to Asia?’, Institute for Energy
Markets and Policies, January.
Shankar, S 2015, ‘Russia using thousands of North Korean “slave labor” in construction
industry: report’, International Business Times, 22 July.
Sheahan, F 2012, ‘Clinton challenges “Soviet” plans for Europe’, The Journal, 7 December.
Shepard, W 2016, ‘Why the China-Europe “Silk Road” rail network is growing fast’,
Forbes, 28 January.
Sheppard, D 2013, ‘Developing world oil demand surpasses wealthy nations: EIA’,
Reuters, 11 June.
Shestakov, Y 2015, ‘China and Russia plan greater Eurasian integration - Expert’, Russia
Beyond the Headlines, 5 June.
Shevtsova, L 2010, Putin’s Russia, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,
Washington DC.
Shirk, A 2015, ‘A superhighway across the Bering Strait’, The Atlantic, 1 July.
182 Bibliography
Skoltech 2014, ‘Northeast Asia Supergrid: Japan, South Korea and Russia mull interconnected
power system at Skoltech Seminar’, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 30 July.
SMH 1999, ‘No turning back now for Alliance’, Sydney Morning Herald, 31 May.
Smith, A 1776, The wealth of nations, Methuen Co, London.
Smith, K 2005, ‘The EU and Central and Eastern Europe: the absence of interregionalism
Journal of European Integration, vol.27, no.3, pp.347-364.
Solovyev, EG 2004, ‘Geopolitics in Russia ֊ science or vocation?’, Communist and Post-
Communist Studies, vol.37, no.l, pp.85-96.
Sonne, P and Grimaldi J 2014, ‘Biden’s Son, Kerry family friend join Ukrainian gas
producer’s board’, The Wall Street Journal, 13 May.
Sorhun, E 2014, Regional economic integration and the global financial system, IGI
Global, Hershey.
Sparke, M 1998, ‘From geopolitics to geoeconomics: transnational state effects in the
borderlands’, Geopolitics, vol.3, no.2, pp.62-98.
Spiro, DE 1999, The hidden hand of American hegemony: petrodollar recycling and
international markets, Cornell University Press, London.
Spolaore, E 2013, What is European integration really about? a political guide for
economists, no.wl9122, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Sputnik 2004, ‘Russia getting ready to refuse foreign transit’, Sputnik News, 23 June.
Sputnik 2015, ‘Russia invites China to explore Arctic, Siberian oil and gas fields’, Sputnik
News, 28 February.
Sputnik 2016a, ‘Baltic countries’ ports drying up due to lack of Russian cargo’, Sputnik
News, 22 April.
Sputnik 2016b, “‘New financial order”: Russia, China placing heavy bets on “petro-yuan”’,
Sputnik News, 21 May.
Sputnik 2016c, ‘Russian-Chinese trade rises 3.6% in first quarter of 2016’, Sputnik News,
13 April.
Sputnik 2016d, ‘Creation of Russian navy base on Kuril Islands “contradicts Japan
position’”, Sputnik News, 28 March.
Spykman, NJ 1942, America’s strategy in world politics: The United States and the balance
of power, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.
Spykman, NJ 1944, The geography of the peace, Harcourt and Brace, New York.
Stalenheim, P, Perdomo, C and Skons, E 2008, ‘Military expenditure’, SIPRI Yearbook.
Stanek, H 2016, ‘Is Russia’s alliance with Greece a threat to NATO?’, The National
Interest, 17 July.
Stephan, JJ 1974, The Kuril Islands: Russo-Japanese frontier in the Pacific, Clarendon
Press, Oxford.
Stiglitz, J 2016, The Euro: And its threat to the future of Europe, Penguin Books, London.
Stockhammer, E 2011, ‘Peripheral Europe’s debt and German Wages. The role of wage
policy in the Euro area, research on money and finance’, Discussion Paper no.29, March.
Stockhammer, E 2014, ‘The Euro crisis and contradictions of neoliberalism in Europe’,
Post Keynesian Economics Study Group, Working Paper 1401, pp.1-18.
Stokes, B, Wike, R and Poushter, J 2016, ‘Europeans question global engagement’, Pew
Research Center, 13 June.
Stolfi, RHS 1988, ‘Marines outside Europe’, in JL George and C Jehn (eds), The US Marine
Corps: the view from the late 1980s, Center for Naval Analyses, Virginia, pp.95—113.
Strange, S 2015, States and markets, Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
Straus, I 2003, NATO: the only west that Russia has?’, Demokratizatsiya, vol.ll,
no.2, pp.229—269.
Bibliography 183
Strauss, V 2014, ‘Russia’s plagiarism problem: even Putin has done it!’. The Washington
Post, 18 March.
Stuenkel, O 2015, The BRfCS and the future of global order, Lexington Books, London.
Stulberg, AN 2015, ‘Dilemmas and prospects for Russian-Northeast Asian energy security’,
in B Kong and JH Ku (eds), Energy Security Cooperation in Northeast Asia, Routledge,
New York, pp. 127-157.
Subramanian, A 2011, ‘The inevitable superpower: why China’s dominance is a sure
thing’, Foreign Affairs, vol.90, p.66-78.
Sultanov, B 2015, ‘Kazakhstan and Eurasian integration’, in P Dutkiewicz and R Sakwa
(eds), Eurasian integration: the view from within, Routledge, London, pp.97—110.
Sumsky, V 2010, ‘Modernisation of Russia, East Asia geopolitics and ASEAN factor’, The
Jakarta Post, 30 October.
Suslov, D 2016, ‘Without a “common space”: a new agenda for Russia-EU relations’,
Russia in Global Affairs, 1 July.
Svet, O and Miller, E 2015, ‘The United States should prevent an Egyptian shift to Russia’,
Middle East Institute, 18 December.
Swaine, MD 2015, ‘Chinese views and commentary on the “One Belt, One Road”
initiative’, Hoover Institution: China Leadership Monitor, issue.47, pp. 1-24.
Swift 2016, ‘SWIFT offers secure financial messaging services to CIPS’, SWIFT’ 25 March.
Szabo, SF 2014, ‘Germany’s commercial realism and the Russia problem’, Survival,
vol.56, no.5, pp.l 17-128.
Szabo, SF 2015, Germany, Russia, and the rise of geo-economics, Bloomsbury Publishing,
London.
Taft, W 1997, ‘NATO and Russia as the two essential parties in European security’,
Conference at George Washington University, February.
Talbott, S 2002, The Russia hand, Random House, New York.
Tanaka, T 2014, ‘Russia pitches undersea gas pipeline to Japan’, Nikkei Asian Review,
15 October.
Tasch, B 2016, “‘Come back to Poland”: Polish deputy Prime Minister wants emigrants to
return’, Business Insider, 19 March.
Tass 2014, ‘Eurasian Economic Union to have common currency in 5-10 years’, TASS,
25 July.
Tass 2015a, ‘IMF’s dilemma: to help or not to help Ukraine, if Kiev defaults’, TASS,
8 December.
Tass 2015b, ‘Russia to respond to possible disconnection from SWIFT - PM’, TASS,
27 January.
Tass 2015c, ‘PM Medvedev says Russia should maintain moderate debt burden, quotes
Benjamin Franklin’, TASS, 14 April.
Tassinari, F 2005, ‘Security and integration in the EU neighbourhood: the case for
regionalism’, CEPS Working Document, No. 226, pp.l—26.
Telegraph 2016, ‘Hillary Clinton addresses military veterans at the Democratic National
Convention’, The Telegraph, 25 July.
Tiezzi, S 2014, ‘Why China embraces Narendra Modi’, The Diplomat, 29 May.
Tiezzi, S 2015, ‘No, China isn’t building a game-changing canal in Thailand (Yet)’, The
Diplomat, 21 May.
Timofeychev, A 2015, ‘Sergey Lavrov pushes for greater Russia-ASEAN ties’, Russia
Beyond the Headlines, 10 August.
Torreblanca, JI and Prislan, N 2012, ‘The ominous rise of geoeconomics’, European
Council on Foreign Relations, 14 February.
184 Bibliography
Trenin, D 2002, The end of Eurasia: Russia on the border between geopolitics and
globalisation, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Moscow.
Trenin, D 2006, ‘Russia’s Asia policy under Vladimir Putin, 2000-2005’, in G Rozman, K
Togo and JP Ferguson (eds), Russian strategic thought toward Asia, Palgrave
Macmillan, New York, pp.l 1-138.
Trenin, D 2011a, Post-Imperium: a Eurasian Story, Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace, Moscow.
Trenin, D 201 lb, ‘Challenges and opportunities: Russia and the rise of China and India’, in
AJ Tellis, T Tanner and J Keough (eds), Strategic Asia 2011—12: Asia responds to its
rising powers: China and India, The National Bureau of Asian Research, Seattle and
Washington, pp.227-255.
Trenin, D 2012a, ‘Russia can pivot to the Pacific, too’, The Globalist, 7 September.
Trenin, D 2012b, ‘True partners? How Russia and China see each other’, Centre for
European Reform, London.
Trenin, D 2014a, ‘Ukraine and the new divide’, Russia in Global Affairs, 22 August.
Trenin, D 2014b, ‘Russia: pivoting to Asia or just to China?’, Carnegie Moscow Center,
24 March.
Trenin, D 2015, ‘From Greater Europe to Greater Asia: the Sino-Russian entente’, Carnegie
Moscow Center, April.
Tsvetov, A 2016, ‘After Crimea: Southeast Asia in Russia’s foreign policy narrative’,
Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, vol.38,
no.I, pp.55-80.
Tsygankov, A 2006, Russia s foreign policy: change and continuity in national identity,
Rowman Littlefield Publishers, New York.
Tsygankov, Andrei P 2009, Russophobia, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Uberoi, P 2016, ‘The BCIM forum: is it sustainable?, in G Das and CJ Thomas (eds),
Look East to Act East Policy: implications for India s Northeast, Routledge,
New York.
Ukraine Today 2016, ‘Ukraine’s Datagroup may be bought by Horizon Capital co-founded
by Jaresko’, Ukraine Today, 12 April.
US Congress 1975, ‘Subcommittee on multinational corporations: multinational oil
corporations and US foreign policy’, US Government Printing Office, 2 January.
US Department of Justice 2014, ‘U.S. charges five Chinese military hackers for cyber
espionage against U.S, corporations and a labor organization for commercial advantage’,
The US Department of Justice, 19 May.
US State Department 1945, Memorandum by the Under Secretary of State (Acheson) to
the Secretary of State, US State Department, 9 October, https://history.state.gov/
historicaldocuments/frus 1945v08/d20.
US Treasury 2013, ‘Report to Congress on International Economic and Exchange Rate
Policies’, US Department of the Treasury Office of International Affairs, 30 October.
Usbome, D 2010, “‘Cosy relationship” revealed between government office and oil
industry’, Independent, 26 May.
Ustyuzhanina, E 2016, ‘The Eurasian Union and global value chains’, European Politics
and Society, vol.17, pp.35-45.
Vahl, M 2005, ‘Lessons from the North for the EU’s “Near Abroad’”, in CS Browning
(ed.), Remaking Europe in the margins: Northern Europe after the enlargements,
Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 51-67.
Valdai 2013, ‘Vladimir Putin meets with members of the Valdai International Discussion
Club, Transcript of the Speech’, Valdai Discussion Club, 20 September.
Bibliography 185
Valvo, G 2012, ‘Syria, Iran and the future of the CSTO — Analysis’, Eurasia Review,
14 December.
Van der Putten, FP and Meijnders, M 2015, ‘China, Europe and the Maritime Silk Road’,
Clingendael, 26 March.
Van Evera, S 2006, ‘American Foreign Policy for the New Era’, in S Van Evera (ed.), How
to Make America safe: New policiesfor national security, The T obin Project, Cambridge.
Veebel, V 2015, ‘Baltic pathways from liberal trade model to neo-mercantilism in the
European Union’, Managing Global Transitions, voL13, no.3, pp.213-229.
Viner, J 1948, ‘Power versus plenty as objectives of foreign policy in the seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries’, World Politics, vol.l, no.l, pp.1-29.
Vinocur, J 2009, ‘German vote a turning point on Russia and its energy’, The New York
Times, 9 March.
Vinokurov, E 2014, ‘Emerging Eurasian continental integration: trade, investment, and
infrastructure’, Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, vol.6, no.l, pp.69-93.
Waever, O 1997, ‘Imperial metaphors: emerging European analogies to pre-nation-state
imperial systems’, in O Tunander, P Baev and VI Einagel (eds), Geopolitics in post-
wall Europe: security, territory and identity, Prio International Research Institute,
Oslo, pp.59-93.
Wagner, RH 1988, ‘Economic interdependence, bargaining power, and political influence’,
International Organization, vol.42, no.3, pp.461-483.
Wagstyl, S and Khalaf, R 2014, ‘Merkel offers Russia trade talks olive branch’, Financial
Times, 26 November.
Walt, SM 1985, ‘Alliance formation and the balance of world power’, International
Security, vol.9, no.4, pp.3—43.
Walt, SM 2006, Taming American power: the global response to US primacy, WW Norton
Co, New York.
Waltz, K 1970, ‘The myth of national interdependence’, in CP Kindleberger (ed.), The
multinational corporation, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Wang, L 2012, ‘Russia’s Eurasian Union strategy and its impact on Sino-Russian relations
and SCO’, Contemporary International Relations, vol.22, no.3, pp.86—96.
Wang, HK 2016, Energy markets in emerging economies: strategies for growth, Routledge,
New York.
Wang, X and Chin, G 2013, ‘Turning point: international money and finance in Chinese
IPE’, Review of International Political Economy, vol.20, no.6, pp. 1244—1275.
Wang, Y 2015, ‘China’s “New Silk Road”: a case study in EU-China relations’, in A
Amighini and A Berkofsky (eds), Xi’s policy gambles: the bumpy road ahead, Italian
Institute for International Political Studies, Milan, pp.93—110.
Weitz, R 2011a, ‘Why Moscow has escalated its territorial dispute with Tokyo’, Pacific
Focus, vol.26, no.2, pp. 137—164.
Weitz, R 201 lb, ‘Challenging Japan over Kurils’, World Politics Review, 1 March.
Weitz, R 2015, ‘Russian policy toward North Korea: steadfast and changing’, Korean
Unification Studies, vol.24, no.3, pp. 1—29.
Werner, RA 2015, ‘Are sanctions making Russia stronger?’, The Japan Times, 21 October.
White, H2012, The China choice: why America should share power, Black Inc., Collingwood.
White, D 2016, ‘Read Hillary Clinton’s speech touting “American exceptionalism’”, Time,
31 August.
White House 1988, ‘National Security Strategy of the United States’, White House, April.
Wigell, M and Vihma, A 2016, ‘Geopolitics versus geoeconomics: the case of Russia’s
geostrategy and its effects on the EU International Affairs, vol.92, no.3, pp.605-627.
186 Bibliography
Wikileaks 2006, ‘Influencing the SARG in the end of 2006’, Wikileaks, 6 December
Wildau, G 2015, ‘China’s “migrant miracle” nears an end as cheap labour dwindles’,
Financial Times, 4 May.
Williams, MC and Neumann, IB 2000, ‘From alliance to security community: NATO,
Russia, and the power of identity’, Millennium-Journal of International Studies, vol.29,
no.2, pp.357-387.
Wilson, WT 2015, ‘Washington, China, and the rise of the renminbi: are the dollar’s days
as the global reserve currency numbered?’, Heritage, Special Report 171, 17 August.
Wilson, JL 2016, ‘The Eurasian Economic Union and China’s Silk Road: implications for
the Russian-Chinese relationship’, European Politics and Society, vol.17, pp. 1—20.
Winer, S 2015, ‘Iran, Russia stage joint naval exercise’, The Times of Israel, 24 October.
Winkler, SE 2015, ‘In search of peace: restructuring the US-Iran relationship in light of the
2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action’, Senior Honors Theses, 31 October.
World Bank 2007, Connecting to compete: trade logistics in the global economy, World
Bank, Washington DC.
World Bank 2012, ‘Kazakhstan in the customs union: losses or gains’, The World Bank,
18 April.
World Bank, 2017, Indicator Report, The World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org/data-
catalog/world-development-indicators.
World Bank 2016a, ‘Economy of Russia’, The World Bank, Washington.
World Bank 2016b, ‘Doing business 2016: measuring regulatory quality and efficiency’,
The World Bank, Washington.
World Bank 2016c, ‘Russia Economic Report 35: the long journey to recovery’, The World
Bank, 6 April.
WSJ 2016, ‘The Russians are coming... to Southeast Asia’, The Wall Street Journal, 6 July.
Xi, J 2013, ‘Let the sense of community of common destiny take deep root in neighbouring
countries’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 25 October.
Xu, Q 2006, ‘Maritime geostrategy and the development of the Chinese navy in the early
twenty-first century’, Naval War College Review, vol.59, no.4, pp.46-67.
Yergin, D 2006, ‘Ensuring energy security’, Foreign Affairs, vol.85, no.2, pp.69-82.
Yevtushenkov, V 2015, ‘Import substitution without self-isolation’, Russia in Global
Affairs, 19 March.
Youngs, R and Springford, J 2013, ‘Europe’s trade strategy: promise or peril?’, Centre for
European Reform, 2 May, pp.39-49.
Zakaria, F 2008, ‘The rise of the rest’, Newsweek, 12 May, pp.24-31.
Zeyno B 2008, ‘Security aspects of the South Stream project’, Hudson Institute, Washington.
Zhong, N 2015, ‘China vows to enhance trade with Eurasian bloc’, China Daily, 11 May.
Ziegler, CE and Menon, R 2014, ‘Neomercantilism and great-power energy competition in
Central Asia and the Caspian’, Strategic Studies, Summer, pp. 17-41.
Zielonka, J 2006, ‘Europe as a global actor: empire by example?, International Affairs,
vol.84, no.3, pp.471-^84.
Zuenko, I 2016, ‘Is Russia losing its logistics edge’, Carnegie Moscow Center, 10 May.
Zysk, K 2011, ‘The evolving Arctic security environment: an assessment’, in SJ Blank
(ed.) Russia in the Arctic, Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle, pp.91-138.
Index
Afghanistan 128-9
Albright, Madeleine 43
Applebaum, A 41
Asian Development Bank (ADB) 26, 91,
108, 113, 129
Asian Financial Crisis (1997-8) 85
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
(AIIB) 43, 91, 103, 128
Asian Pacific Economic Community
(APEC) 2, 68, 91
Association of Southeast Asian Nations
(ASEAN): Master Plan on ASEAN
Connectivity (2010) 130;
Russia-ASEAN relations 130-1
balances of dependence: asymmetrical
dependences 14-16, 21, 28; and the
balance of power logic 14; concept of 3;
offensive/defensive manipulations of 15;
power equilibrium within regions 22-3;
swing strategies and 158
Bangladesh, China, India, Myanmar
(BCIM) Economic Corridor 88
bargaining power 20-1
Bastrykin, Aleksandr 158
Belarus 77, 78
Blair, Tony 137
Bretton Woods system 4, 23, 27, 28, 33
BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South
Africa): economic cooperation in 5;
EEU-BRICS-SCO integration 104-6;
New Development Bank (NDB) 79-80,
91
Brzeziński, Z 26, 36, 44, 45, 46, 74
Central Asia Regional Economic
Cooperation (CAREC) 88
Central Command (CENTCOM) 36
Central Treaty Organisation (CENTO) 35
China: asymmetrical interdependent
relationships with the USA 84-6;
Bangladesh, China, India, Myanmar
(BCIM) Economic Corridor 88;
currency manipulation 83, 84; cyber
espionage units 83; as driving force
behind SCO 104-6; Eastern Siberian-
Pacific Ocean (ESPO) pipeline 70, 99,
100, 113; economic decoupling from US
dollar 102; EEU as China-EU conduit
76; enhanced connectivity with Iran
125-6, 127; era of economic transition
66; EU-Chinese relations 153;
export-led development 82-3; finance
institutions 90-1; gas supplies to 71;
gold reserves 104; infrastructure
development 84; institutional
convergence with Russia 104—6;
internationalisation of the yuan 91-2;
investment in Russia 92; involvement in
international affairs 83; inward-looking
development strategy 81, 83, 93; joint
financial policies with Russia 102—3; as
a maritime power 89-90, 153; Opium
Wars 24, 25; outbound direct investment
strategy 84; parallel international
financial infrastructures 103; Power of
Siberia gas pipelines 71, 88, 100-1;
rouble-yuan trade 103; Russian-Chinese
asymmetries of power 96-100;
Russian-Chinese energy collaboration
100-1; Russian-Chinese infrastructure
projects 5; Russian-Chinese initiatives
for Great Eurasia 27—8; Russian-Chinese
relations 158; Russian-Chinese
transportation collaborations 101-2;
selective accommodation in US-China-
Russia relations 44-6; Silk Road
initiative 4, 28, 86-7, 93; technology
188 Index
transfer 83; as threat to Russia 92—3;
trade agreements 86; trade levels 92;
trade with the West, historical 24;
Ukrainian-Chinese port project in
Crimea 75; as US creditor 40, 85, 93;
Western Development Plan 86—7
China International Payment System
(CIPS) 43, 91
China-Pakistan Economic Corridor
(CPEC) 88-9, 128
Clinton, Bill 51
Clinton, Hillary 41, 43, 45, 46, 127, 132,
146
Collective Security Treaty Organisation
(CSTO) 45-6
Cornett, PG 44
cyber espionage/warfare 42-3, 83
Deng Xiaoping 82
Duterte, Rodrigo 90
economic connectivity: ancient Silk Road
23; defined 5; within geoeconomics 3;
Indian-Russian 124—5; role of
infrastructure 3, 26; South Korean-
Russian 118-19; and state bargaining
powers 11; see also Eurasian
connectivity
Egypt 133—4
energy sector: Chinese-Russian energy
collaboration 100-1; Eastern Siberian-
Pacific Ocean (ESPO) pipeline 70, 99,
100, 113; electricity grids 72; energy
corporations as strategic assets 16; the
energy curse 55-6; Energy Strategy of
Russia to 2020 55; Energy Strategy of
Russia until 2030 59, 70; EU energy
dependence on Russia 58-60, 61-2; EU
energy policy 138-9; EU-Russia
bilateral energy deals 150; gas supply
70-1; gas supply to China 71; Georgia/
Azerbaijan pipelines 37;
Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) pipeline 127-8;
Middle Eastern oil reserves, post-WWII
33-4; Nord Stream pipeline (Germany-
Russia) 59, 150, 153; nuclear energy
industry 71-2; renationalisation of
Russia’s energy resources 54; Russian
supplies to ASEAN 132; Russian supply
networks to Eurasia 69-70; Russian-
Japanese trade 113-14; Russia’s key
role in 4, 64; Russia’s use of energy
weapon in Ukraine 150; shale revolution
(USA) 30, 40; South Korean-Russian
energy connectivity projects 118; state
control of 16; swing supplier strategies
69, 70, 71; Turkmenistan, Afghanistan,
Pakistan, India (TAPI) gas pipeline
project 128-9; US attempts to control in
the Middle East 38; US energy security
policies 36; US petrodollar currency of
35,103-4
Eurasia: anti-US regionalism 21;
integration, defined 11 ; integration
projects 4; regional trade within 66-7;
US geoeconomic strategy for 3-4, 26-7;
Western trade dominance, historical
23-4; Yeltsin’s vision for 51—2; see also
Greater Eurasia
Eurasian connectivity: as counter-
hegemonic 26, 79; and the decline of the
West 67; Heartland Theory 3,24-5,
32-3, 36-7; institutions of 65; key role
of Kazakhstan 87-8; new vision of 64,
65-6; post-Cold War 26-9; Rimland
Theory 25; Russian-Chinese initiatives
for Great Eurasia 27-8; and Russia’s
West-East civilizational choice 65;
swing power strategies 66
Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) 105
Eurasian Economic Union (EEU):
asymmetrical interdependent
relationships within 76; as China-EU
conduit 76; collective bargaining powers
76; common currency debates 78;
dominance of Russia in 76, 77;
economic agreements with
non-members 77; EEU-BRICS-SCO
integration 5, 104-6; EEU-Vietnam
FTA 131; EU-EEU relations 154, 6065;
function of 7, 8, 21, 75-6; functionalist-
federalist tensions 77; Kazakhstan’s
membership of 76, 77, 78; Russian
domestic concerns over 77-8;
SCO-EEU-Silk Road convergence 8,
104; supranational institutions 78; US
hostility towards 46
European Union (EU): bilateral energy
deals with Russia 150; Chinese-EU
relations 153; Common Spaces
Agreement with Russia 147-8;
conflicting economic development
models 141-2; debts of member states
146; Eastern Partnership 148; EEU as
China-EU conduit 76; EEU-EU relations
154; energy dependence on Russia
58-60, 61-2; energy policies 138-9;
enlargement 143; European
index 189
Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) 147;
EU-Russia formats (28+1) 49;
EU-Russia Partnership for
Modernisation’ 57; federalist integration
142—5; geoeconomic decline 139-41;
geoeconomic power of 137—9;
Germany’s geoeconomic status within
139-41, 142, 146, 153; member to
non-member trade levels 152—3;
monetary union 143—5; regulatory
power 138; Russia as obstacle to Wider
Europe 147; Russian-EU relations
148-9, 150, 151; Russia’s wedge tactics
towards 148; Ukraine, EU stance on
60—1, 149; unbalanced power
relationship with Russia, post- Cold War
50—1; US-EU relations 149; Wider
Europe concept 146—7
Farage, Nigel 142, 151
federalist integration 22
Fukuyama, F 19
functionalist integration 22—3, 77
geoeconomics: conflation with
neomercantilism 13—14; and defensive/
offensive neomercantilism 15; defined 3,
12; economic coercion strategies 15—16;
economic connectivity 3; importance of
geography 16, 28; and political stability
20; relationship to political power 13
Georgia 37
Germany: benefits of the monetary union
144, 145; geoeconomic status within the
EU 139-41, 142, 146, 153; naval arms
race with Britain 139; neomercantilism
141-2; Nord Stream pipeline agreement
with Russia 59, 150, 153; response to
the Financial Crisis !454 ; wage
suppression policy 141
Gilpin, R 17
Giscard d’Estaing, Valery 137
Global Financial Crisis 2, 85, 145-6
globalisation 3-4, 21
Great Britain (GB): maritime trade,
historical 24; naval arms race with
Germany 139; Opium Wars 24, 25;
UKIP (UK Independence Party) 142,
151
Greater Eurasia: as alternative to Europe
150; China’s key role 81;
EEU-BRICS-SCO integration 5, 104-6;
integration, defined 3; Russian
geoeconomic strategy for 1-2, 3, 4,
157-61; Russian-Chinese initiatives for
27—8; SCO as key institution for 5, 78—9;
as threat to EU 152-4; see also Eurasia
Greater Europe: concept of 48, 49; Putin’s
project for 52, 62; in relation to a
Sino-Russian partnership 97—8; Russian
geoeconomic strategy for 2
Greece 89, 146, 151, 152, 153
Heartland Theory (Mackinder) 24—5, 26,
32-3, 36
Heckscher, E 14
Hettne, B 21
Hirschman, Albert 3, 11, 13, 16
Huntington, SP 17, 19
IMF (International Monetary Fund):
alternative financial institutions 43; rules
on lending to states that default on
sovereign debt 42
India: Bangladesh, China, India, Myanmar
(BCIM) Economic Corridor 88;
common institutions with Russia
129-30; economic connectivity with
Russia 124—5; Iranian-Indian energy
trade 125; Iranian-Indian relations
125- 6, 127; Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI)
pipeline 127-8; multipolar Eurasian
integration strategies 123-4;
North-South transportation corridor
126— 9; Russian-Indian relations 124;
Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
India (TAPI) gas pipeline project 128-9
Indonesia 32, 89, 131, 132
infrastructure: China-Pakistan Economic
Corridor (CPEC) 88-9, 128;
development in China 84; Eastern
Siberian-Pacific Ocean (ESPO) pipeline
70, 99, 100, 113; for economic
connectivity 3, 26; energy pipelines
circumventing Russia 37; energy
transportation corridors 16; gas pipeline
infrastructure 70-1 ; Maritime Silk Road
89—90; Nord Stream pipeline agreement
with Russia 59, 150, 153; parallel
international financial infrastructures
103; Power of Siberia gas pipelines 71,
88, 100-1; role in new Eurasianism
64-5; Russian projects for 4—5;
Russian-Chinese infrastructure projects
5; Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
India (TAPI) gas pipeline project 128-9;
see also Silk Road; transportation
infrastructure
190 Index
institutions 43; alternatives to the IMF 43;
China International Payment System
(CIPS) 43, 91; common Indian-Russian
institutions 129-30; of the EEU and
Eurasianism 65; role of SCO 5, 78-9;
Russian-Chinese institutional convergence
104-6; SWIFT 34,43, 91, 125; see also
Eurasian Economic Union (EEU)
Iran: Chabahar port 128, 132; common
institutions with Russia 129-30;
enhanced connectivity with India, China
and Russia 125-6, 127; expulsion from
SWIFT system 34, 125; future
membership of SCO 130; Indian-Iranian
energy trade 125; Indian-Iranian
relations 127; Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI)
pipeline 127—8; military cooperation
with Russia 130; North-South
transportation corridor 126-9; Russian-
Iranian relations 126; sanctions against
125, 126, 158; stance on Eurasian-centric
order 125; US-Iranian relations 37, 43—4
Iraq 35—6, 37-8
Japan: critical role in Eurasia 26, 31;
Eastern Siberian-Pacific Ocean (ESPO)
pipeline 70, 99, 100, 113; Russian-
Japanese energy trade 113-14;
Russian-Japanese relations 109, 111,
113, 114-15, 116-17; sanctions against
Russia 116-17; US-Japanese relations
84, 110-11, 116; see also Southern
Kuril Islands
Jaresko, Natalie 41
Karaganov, Sergei 66, 150
Kazakhstan: key role in Eurasian
connectivity projects 87-8; membership
of the EEU 76, 77, 78; transportation
links 73
Kennan, G 33
Kissinger, Henry 53, 87, 160
Kohler, Horst 141
Kozyrev, V 53
Kundnani, H 142
laissez-faire capitalism 17-20,28
Lavrov, Sergei 66, 67
Le Pen, Marine 151
List, Friedrich 17, 18-19
Lorot, P 12
Mackinder, Halford 11, 24—5, 26, 37, 65
Mahan, Alfred Thayer 31, 32
maritime power: China as 89-90, 153; and
laissez-faire economics 28; and Rimland
Theory 25; transience of 25: US as 30,
31-2
Maritime Silk Road 89-90, 92-3
maritime trade: British, historical 24; in
Eurasia 3, 4, 11; and free trade
economics 18, 23; Western trade
dominance in Eurasia, historical 23—4
Marsha] Plan 33, 87
mechanisms for cooperation 3
Medvedev, Dmitry 42, 43, 56, 67, 115, 116
Merkel, Angela 154
Middle East: Central Command
(CENTCOM) 36; oil reserves,
post-WWII 33-4; Russian geoeconomic
strategy for 132-3; US geoeconomic
strategy for 37-8; US military presence
in 35; see also individual countries
military power: military technology to
commercial segments transfer 15; for
neomercantilism 14; relationship to
economic power 13; of the US 30, 35;
US invasion of Iraq, 2003 38; US
reliance on, post-Cold War 36-7
NAFTA (North American Free Trade
Agreement) 38-9
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty
Organization): establishment of 35;
queuing system for membership of
50-1; role in guiding Europe-Russia
relations 42; Russia and 5; and US
influence in Europe 37
neoclassical realism 17
neomercantilism: conflation with
geoeconomics 13-14; currency
manipulation 15; defensive/offensive
15; in Germany 141-2; and militaiy
power 14; and realist theoiy 13; and
state-economy relationship 18
Neumann, M 49
New Development Bank (NDB) 79-80, 91
North Korea 119, 120-1
Obama, Barack 40-1, 42, 45, 61, 86
One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative see
Silk Road
Opium Wars 24, 25
Padoa-Schioppa, T 144
Pakistan: China-Pakistan Economic
Corridor (CPEC) 88—9, 128; Gwadar
port 88, 128, 132; Iran-Pakistan-India
Index 191
(IPI) pipeline 127-8; membership of
SCO 130; Russian-Pakistan economic
cooperation 129-30; Turkmenistan,
Afghanistan, Pakistan, India (TAPI) gas
pipeline project 128-9
ParkGeun-hye 117, 119
Perry, William 51
Philippines 90
Prodi, Romano 149
Putin, Vladimir: BR1CS solidarity 80;
development of port infrastructure 74,
75; Eurasianism 79; great power status
of Russia 53; Greater Europe project 52,
62; on harmonization of interests 154;
need for development of Russian Far
East 68; reversal of the rule of the
oligarchs 54-5; role of the EEU 77;
Russia as land bridge across Eurasia 73;
Russian-Japanese relations and the
Southern Kuril Islands 111-12; Russia’s
energy strategy 70; SCO Development
Bank 106; the TPP 86
rationality: defined 12; Russia’s strategy
for Eurasian integration 5-6; and state
decision-making 17; and state-economy
relationship 17
Reagan, Ronald 32-3
realist theory: balance of power logic 5,
11, 14, 15, 17; more refs?? 30-1;
neoclassical realism 17; and
neomercantilism 13; Russia-Europe
relationship, post-Cold War 50; and
unipolarity 27, 30-1, 44
regionalism: as counter to US global
dominance 21; federalist 22;
functionalist 22-3; and sovereignty 21-2
Rimland Theory 25
Rolland, N 87
Rosatom 71-2
Russia: asymmetrical interdependent
relationship with the EU 49; Chinese
investment in 92; Chinese-Russian
asymmetries of power 96-100; Chinese-
Russian energy collaboration 100-1;
Chinese-Russian infrastructure projects
5; Chinese-Russian initiatives for Great
Eurasia 27—8; Chinese-Russian relations
158; Chinese-Russian transportation
collaborations 101-2; common
institutions with India 129-30;
development of the Russian Far East 68,
73; development of Vladivostok 68-9,
71, 117; economic connectivity with
India 124-5; economic connectivity with
South Korea 118-19; economic
decoupling from US dollar 102;
economic modernisation policies 56-8;
economic reform to avoid the energy
curse 56-7; Egyptian-Russian relations
133-4; Energy Strategy of Russia to
2020 55; Energy Strategy of Russia until
2030 59; energy supply networks to
Eurasia 69-70; energy weapon in
Ukraine 150; EU Common Spaces
Agreement 147-8; EU energy
dependence on Russia 58-60, 61-2; as
Eurasian Great Power 67-8; European
Russia-Russian Far East integration
67-9; EU-Russia bilateral energy deals
150; EU-Russia ‘Partnership for
Modernisation’ 57; EU-Russia relations
148-9, 150, 151; geopolitical to
geoeconomic transition 53-—4, 158-9;
gold reserves 104; great power status
52-3; Greater Eurasia strategy 1-2, 3, 4,
157-61; import substitution policies
57-8; institutional convergence with
China 104-6; integration initiatives with
former Soviet states 45-6; Iranian-
Russian relations 126; Japanese sanctions
against 116-17; Japanese-Russian energy
trade 113-14; Japanese-Russian relations
109, 111, 113, 114-15, 116-17;joint
financial policies with China 102-4; key
role in global energy 4, 64; military
cooperation with Iran 130; military
strategies for Syria 130, 133; Nord
Stream pipeline 59, 150, 153; North
Korean-Russian relations 120-1;
North-South transportation corridor
126-9; as obstacle to EU’s Wider Europe
project 147; Pakistan-Russian economic
cooperation 129-30; parallel
international financial infrastructures
103; Power of Siberia gas pipelines 71,
88, 100-1; renationalisation of energy
resources 54; reversal of the rule of the
oligarchs 54; rouble-yuan trade 103;
Russia-ASEAN relations 130-1; Russian
Far East development 102, 117;
sanctions against and counter-sanctions
by 58, 61; Saudi-Russian relations 135;
selective accommodation in US-China-
Russia relationships 44-6; South
Korean-Russian relations 119-20; threat
from China 92-3; threat of expulsion
from SWIFT system 34, 43;
192 Index
Turkish-Russian relations 134-5;
Ukrainian debt repayments 42;
unbalanced power relationship with
Europe, post-Cold war 50-1; US
containment policies against 27, 31,
32—3; US strategies to reduce Russian
global influence 40-1; US-Russian
relations 159-60; Vietnamese-Russian
relations 131; Vladivostok development
68-9, 71, 117; wedge-tactic towards the
EU 148; West-East civilizational choice
65; Western-centric policies, post-Cold
War 48, 50; see also Putin, Vladimir
Saudi Arabia 33-4, 35, 37, 103-4, 135
Schmidt, Helmut 140
Serbia 151
Sering, Max 14
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation
(SCO): EEU-BRICS-SCO integration 5,
104-6; Iran s membership of44, 130; as
key institution for Greater Eurasia 5,
78—9; as limiting factor on Western
influence 21; Pakistan’s membership of
130; SCO Development Bank 79;
SCO-EEU-Silk Road convergence 104
Silk Road: Chinese initiative for 4, 28,
86-7, 93; Crimea deep water port 75;
Maritime Silk Road 89—90, 92—3; new
Silk Road project 28, 72—3; Russian-
Chinese relations 92; SCO-EEU-Silk
Road convergence 104; transportation
infrastructure 87—9; US concept of 27,
38, 129
Silk Road (ancient) 3, 23, 86
Smith, Adam 18, 19
Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial
Telecommunication (SWIFT) 34, 43,
91, 125
South Korea: economic connectivity with
Russia 118—19; energy connectivity
projects with Russia 118; Eurasia
Initiative 117—18; future re-integration
with North Korea 119; rail links
between South Korea and Russia 118;
Russia-South Korean relations 119-20;
US military presence in 119; US-South
Korean relations 119
Southern Kuril Islands: Medvedev’s
presidential visit to 116; Russian
development of 115—16; Russian-
Japanese relations over 109-12, 114—15;
sovereignty of 110; strategic importance
of 112, 115-16; US stance on 110-11
Spykman, NJ 11,25, 31
Spykman- Kennan thesis of containment
32
Stiglitz, J 145
strategic industries: end of the oligarch’s
rule, Russia 54; energy corporations 16;
importance of 16; Russia’s import
substitution policies 57-8
strategies 5-6, 11
Syria 130, 133
Taft, William 51
technology transfer: and balances of power
15; in China 83; to Russia from East
Asia 67; and Russia’s Western-centric
policies 53, 57
Thailand 132
trade blocs 21
Transatlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership (TTIP) 7, 30, 40-1, 46
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) 7, 30,
40-1, 86, 91
transportation infrastructure: for the Baltic
and Black Seas 74—5, 123, 132;
Berlin-Baghdad Railway 134; Chabahar
port, Iran 128, 132; Chinese-Russian
collaborations 101-2; Gwadarport,
Pakistan 88, 128, 132; North America-
Trans-Eurasian Belt Development 74;
Northeast Asia-Europe Land Bridge 73;
Northern Sea Route 74; North-South
transportation corridor 126-9; port
development 73; rail links between
South Korea and Russia 118;
Russia-North Korea joint initiatives
120—1; Russia’s high speed rail network
102; Silk Road initiative 87—9;
transportation infrastructure in European
Russia 74; Trans-Siberian railway 73;
Vladivostok development 68-9, 117; see
also Silk Road
Trenin, D 65, 99
Trump, Donald 45, 159-60
Trutnev, Yuri 68
Turkey 134-5
Turkmenistan 88, 128-9
Ukraine: China’s diplomatic support for
Russia 100; Chinese-Ukrainian port
project 75; debt repayments to Russia
42; democracy promotion in by the USA
41; energy supply lines through 37, 150;
EU stance on 149; key strategic role of
46, 155—6; loan repayments to Russia
Index 193
42; non-bloc status 60; ‘Orange
Revolution’ 59; Russia-EU conflict over
60—1; Russian access to the Black Sea
from Crimea 75
United States of America (USA):
asymmetrical interdependent
relationships with China 84-6; China’s
rising Maritime influence 90;
containment strategy against the Soviet
Union/Russia 27, 31, 32-3; cyber
espionage/warfare 42—3; debt to China
40, 85, 93; decline of geoeconomic
power 34-40; declining global primacy
4, 11,21, 26; domestic economy 39-40;
economic decoupling from US dollar
102; economic pre-eminence,
post-WWII 33-4; energy security
policies 36; Eurasian connectivity
strategies 3-4, 26-7; EU-US relations
149; future alliances 159; geoeconomic
strategy for Eurasia 3-4; geoeconomic
strategy for the Middle East 37—8;
hegemonic stability 26, 27, 36, 38-9;
hostility towards the EEU 46; island
chains 32; Japanese-US relations 84,
110-11, 116; as maritime power 30,
31-2; military power 30, 35; military
presence in South Korea 119; military
presence in the Middle East 125;
military strategies for Syria 133; North
America-Trans-Eurasian Belt
Development 74; offshore balancing
role 31, 46; overview of geoeconomic
power 30-1; Philippine separation from
90; reliance on military power,
post-Cold War 36—7; resurgence of
geoeconomic bargaining 40-6; rise of
geoeconomic power in Eurasia 31—4;
sanction regimes 34; sanctions against
Iran 125, 126; selective accommodation
in US-China-Russia relationships 44-6;
shale revolution 30, 40; Silk Road
initiative 27, 38, 129; South Korean-US
relations 119; stance on the Southern
Kuril Islands 110-11; strategies to
counter dominance of 21, 26; strategies
to reduce Russian global influence 40-1;
TTIP and TTP trade deals 40-1 ;
unbalanced power relationship with
Russia, post- Cold War 50-1; US dollar
as global reserve currency 34, 35,
39-40, 102; US-Russian relations
159-60
Vietnam 131
Viner, J 12
Vladivostok, Russia 68—9, 71, 117
Xi Jinping 89
Yeltsin, Boris: Eurasian vision 51—2;
Russian-Japanese relations and the
Southern Kuril Islands 111; Western-
centric policies, post-Cold War 50-1, 52
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Diesen, Glenn |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1164975889 |
| author_facet | Diesen, Glenn |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Diesen, Glenn |
| author_variant | g d gd |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044408105 |
| callnumber-first | D - World History |
| callnumber-label | DK510 |
| callnumber-raw | DK510.764 |
| callnumber-search | DK510.764 |
| callnumber-sort | DK 3510.764 |
| callnumber-subject | DK - Russia, Soviet Union, Former Soviet Republics, Poland |
| classification_rvk | ML 7250 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)976443291 (DE-599)BVBBV044408105 |
| dewey-full | 337.4705 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 337 - International economics |
| dewey-raw | 337.4705 |
| dewey-search | 337.4705 |
| dewey-sort | 3337.4705 |
| dewey-tens | 330 - Economics |
| discipline | Politologie Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03582nam a2200697 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044408105</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190306 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170712s2018 xxk |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">016052926</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780415791687</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-415-79168-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)976443291</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044408105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">DK510.764</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">337.4705</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ML 7250</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123210:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diesen, Glenn</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1164975889</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia</subfield><subfield code="c">Glenn Diesen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London and New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xii, 193 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rethinking Asia and international relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geopolitics</subfield><subfield code="x">Economic aspects</subfield><subfield code="z">Russia (Federation)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wirtschaftspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066493-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Planung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115587-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057952-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003846-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geopolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4156741-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Russia (Federation)</subfield><subfield code="x">Foreign relations</subfield><subfield code="z">Eurasia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eurasia</subfield><subfield code="x">Foreign relations</subfield><subfield code="z">Russia (Federation)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Russia (Federation)</subfield><subfield code="x">Foreign economic relations</subfield><subfield code="z">Eurasia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eurasia</subfield><subfield code="x">Foreign economic relations</subfield><subfield code="z">Russia (Federation)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Russland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076899-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Eurasien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015685-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Russland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076899-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Eurasien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015685-0</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geopolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4156741-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Wirtschaftspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066493-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003846-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Politische Planung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115587-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057952-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="C">b</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, ebk</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-315-21222-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000006&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Gemischte Register</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029809987</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Russia (Federation) Foreign relations Eurasia Eurasia Foreign relations Russia (Federation) Russia (Federation) Foreign economic relations Eurasia Eurasia Foreign economic relations Russia (Federation) Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd Eurasien (DE-588)4015685-0 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Russia (Federation) Foreign relations Eurasia Eurasia Foreign relations Russia (Federation) Russia (Federation) Foreign economic relations Eurasia Eurasia Foreign economic relations Russia (Federation) Russland Eurasien |
| id | DE-604.BV044408105 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:52:10Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780415791687 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 016052926 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029809987 |
| oclc_num | 976443291 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-12 |
| physical | xii, 193 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Rethinking Asia and international relations |
| spelling | Diesen, Glenn (DE-588)1164975889 aut Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia Glenn Diesen London and New York Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2018 xii, 193 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Rethinking Asia and international relations Includes bibliographical references and index Außenpolitik Geopolitics Economic aspects Russia (Federation) Wirtschaftspolitik (DE-588)4066493-4 gnd rswk-swf Politische Planung (DE-588)4115587-7 gnd rswk-swf Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd rswk-swf Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd rswk-swf Geopolitik (DE-588)4156741-9 gnd rswk-swf Russia (Federation) Foreign relations Eurasia Eurasia Foreign relations Russia (Federation) Russia (Federation) Foreign economic relations Eurasia Eurasia Foreign economic relations Russia (Federation) Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd rswk-swf Eurasien (DE-588)4015685-0 gnd rswk-swf Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 g Eurasien (DE-588)4015685-0 g Geopolitik (DE-588)4156741-9 s Wirtschaftspolitik (DE-588)4066493-4 s Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 s Politische Planung (DE-588)4115587-7 s Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 s b DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, ebk 978-1-315-21222-7 Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000006&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Register // Gemischte Register |
| spellingShingle | Diesen, Glenn Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia Außenpolitik Geopolitics Economic aspects Russia (Federation) Wirtschaftspolitik (DE-588)4066493-4 gnd Politische Planung (DE-588)4115587-7 gnd Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd Geopolitik (DE-588)4156741-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4066493-4 (DE-588)4115587-7 (DE-588)4057952-9 (DE-588)4003846-4 (DE-588)4156741-9 (DE-588)4076899-5 (DE-588)4015685-0 |
| title | Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia |
| title_auth | Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia |
| title_exact_search | Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia |
| title_full | Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia Glenn Diesen |
| title_fullStr | Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia Glenn Diesen |
| title_full_unstemmed | Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia Glenn Diesen |
| title_short | Russia's geoeconomic strategy for a greater Eurasia |
| title_sort | russia s geoeconomic strategy for a greater eurasia |
| topic | Außenpolitik Geopolitics Economic aspects Russia (Federation) Wirtschaftspolitik (DE-588)4066493-4 gnd Politische Planung (DE-588)4115587-7 gnd Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd Geopolitik (DE-588)4156741-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Außenpolitik Geopolitics Economic aspects Russia (Federation) Wirtschaftspolitik Politische Planung Strategie Geopolitik Russia (Federation) Foreign relations Eurasia Eurasia Foreign relations Russia (Federation) Russia (Federation) Foreign economic relations Eurasia Eurasia Foreign economic relations Russia (Federation) Russland Eurasien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029809987&sequence=000006&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT diesenglenn russiasgeoeconomicstrategyforagreatereurasia |