Building trust and democracy: transitional justice in post-communist countries
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2017
|
| Ausgabe: | First edition |
| Schriftenreihe: | Oxford studies in democratization
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Literaturverzeichnis Register // Gemischte Register Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | xviii, 350 Seiten Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9780198793328 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044327473 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20181107 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 170526s2017 xx |||| |||| 10||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780198793328 |c hbk. |9 978-0-19-879332-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)992533066 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044327473 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 |a DE-188 |a DE-703 |a DE-739 |a DE-824 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a ME 3370 |0 (DE-625)122599: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a MG 80097 |0 (DE-625)122863:12056 |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a NQ 8306 |0 (DE-625)128986: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Horne, Cynthia M. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1136049258 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Building trust and democracy |b transitional justice in post-communist countries |c Cynthia M. Horne |
| 250 | |a First edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Oxford University Press |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a xviii, 350 Seiten |b Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Oxford studies in democratization | |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1989-2012 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Demokratisierung |0 (DE-588)4124941-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Transitional Justice |0 (DE-588)1069126748 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Vertrauen |0 (DE-588)4063290-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Osteuropa |0 (DE-588)4075739-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Democracy / Europe, Eastern / Congresses | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Democracy / Europe, Central / Congresses | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Trust / Europe, Eastern / Congresses | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Trust / Europe, Central / Congresses | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Transitional justice / Europe, Eastern / Congresses | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Transitional justice / Europe, Central / Congresses | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Osteuropa |0 (DE-588)4075739-0 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Transitional Justice |0 (DE-588)1069126748 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Demokratisierung |0 (DE-588)4124941-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Vertrauen |0 (DE-588)4063290-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1989-2012 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Gemischte Register |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09049 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 09049 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09049 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029730813 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818428363329503232 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
Bibliography
Adler, Nanci. 2013. “Russia,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. Encyclopedia of
Transitional Justice, Vol 2. New York: Cambridge University Press: 404-12.
Almond, Gabriel and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture. New York: Sage
Publications.
Ames Cobián, Rolando and Félix Reátegui. 2009. “Toward Systemic Social Transform-
ation: Truth Commissions and Development,” in Pablo de Greiff and Roger Duthie,
eds. Transitional Justice and Development: Making Connections. New York: Social
Science Research Council: 142-69.
Amsterdam, Robert. 2008. “Lustration and the Politics of Memory in Russia,” Amster-
dam Partners LLP. November 1. https://robertamsterdam.com/lustration_and_
the_politics_of_memory_in_russia/, accessed Ocotber 25, 2016.
Anusauskas, Arvydas. 2011.“Liustracijos komisija savó darb^ padaré (The Lustration
Commission Has Done Its Job)” BNS ir lrytas.lt inf. May 18, 2011.
Anusauskas, Arvydas. 2012. “Coalition with the KGB” (Koalicija su KGB), Delfi.lty
October 1, 2012, http://www.delii.lt/news/balsuok2012/politikoakimis/aanusauskas-
koalicija-su-kgb.d?id=59624659.
Arenhövel, Mark. 2008. “Democratization and Transitional Justice,” Democratization
15, 3 (June): 570-87.
Auckerman, Miriam. 2002. “Extraordinary Evil, Ordinary Crime: A Framework for
Understanding Transitional Justice,” Harvard Human Rights Journal 15, 39: 39-97.
Austin, Robert. 2013. “Albania,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. Encyclopedia
of Transitional Justice. Vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press: 7-14.
Austin, Robert and Jonathan Ellison. 2008. “Post-Communist Transitional Justice in
Albania,” East European Politics and Societies 22, 2: 373-401.
Backer, David. 2010. “Watching a Bargain Unravel? A Panel Study of Victims’
Attitudes about Transitional Justice in Cape Town, South Africa,” International
Journal of Transitional Justice 4 (November): 443-56.
Baeva, Iskra and Evgenia Kalinova. 2010. “Bulgarian Transition and the Memory of
the Socialist Past,” in Maria Todorova, ed. Remembering Communism. Genres of
Representation. New York: Social Science Research Council: 57-94.
Baeva, Iskra and Evgenia Kalinova. 2011. “How the Post-1989 Bulgarian Society
Perceives the Role of the State Security Service,” Socialism in the Mirror of Transition:
East-West: 391-414.
Baeva, Iskra and Evgenia Kalinova. 2012. “Modem Bulgarian Society and its Notion of
the Age of Socialism,” East-West (Социализмът в огледалото на прехода.
Изток—Запад): 415-38.
Balcerowicz, Leszek. 1995. Socialism, Capitalism, Transformation. Budapest: Central
European University Press.
318
Bibliography
Balkan Insight. 2008. “Debate Heats Up Over Albania ‘Clean Hands* Bill,” Balkan
Insight December 22. http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/debate-heats-up-
over-albania-clean-hands-bill, accessed July 20, 2014.
Barahona de Brito, Alexandra, Carmen González-Enríquez, and Paloma Aguilar, eds.
2001. The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, Elizabeth, Péter Hack, and Agnes Munkácsi, 2007. “Lustration as Political
Competition: Vetting in Hungary,” in Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff,
eds. Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies.
New York: ICTJ and Social Science Research Council: 260-307.
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1996. “Accountability for International Crimes and Serious
Violations of Fundamental Human Rights: Searing for Peace and Achieving Justice:
the Need for Accountability,” Law and Contemporary Problems 59, 9: 9-28.
Beck, Thorsten, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh. 2010.
“New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions,”
World Bank Economic Review 15,1:165-76. http://go.worldbank.org/2EAGGLRZ40.
updated December 2010.
Bernhard, Michael and Ruchan Kaya. 2012. “Civil Society and Regime Type in
European Post-Communist Countries: The Perspective Two Decades After
1989-1991,” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 8, 2: 1-13.
Bertschi, C. Charles. 1995. “Lustration and the Transition to Democracy: The Cases of
Poland and Bulgaria,” East European Quarterly XXVIII, 4 (January): 435-51.
Bierzańska, Anna. 2012. “Walesa scorns new informant claim,” PR dla Zagranicy,
20 February; http://www.thenews.pl/1/9/Artykul/90777,Walesa-scoms-new-informant-
claims.
Bikont, Anna. 1992. “Interview with Bogdan Borusewicz: I Don't Believe the Files
Were Falsified,” Uncaptive Minds, translated from Gazeta Wyorcza (June 29, 1992)
(Summer): 115-22.
Bivol, Alex. 2011. “Bulgarian Constitutional Court repeals lustration of diplomat
agents,” The Sofia Echo, November 24.
Boed, Roman. 1999. “An Evaluation of the Legality and Efficacy of Lustration as a Tool
of Transitional Justice,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 37, 2: 357-402.
Bollen, Kenneth. 2001. Cross National Indicators of Liberal Democracy. https://www3.
nd.edu/~mcoppedg/QPA/BollenCodebook.pdf, last accessed June 15, 2016.
Bollen, Kenneth and Pamela Paxton. 2000. “Subjective Measures of Liberal Democracy,”
Comparative Political Studies 33,1: 58-86.
Boston Globe. 2007. “The New Purge in Poland,” The Boston Globe, April 9.
Braithwaite, Valerie. 1998. “Communal and Exchange Trust Norms: Their Value Base
and Relevance to Institutional Trust,” in Valerie Braith waite and Margaret Levi, eds.
Trust in Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 46-75.
Braithwaite, Valerie and Margaret Levi, eds. 1998. Trust and Governance. New York:
Russell Sage Foundation.
Brehm, John and Wendy Rahn. 1997. “Individual level Evidence for the Causes
and Consequences of Social Capital,” American Journal of Political Science 41, 3:
999-1023.
Bibliography 319
Brown, J.F. 1991. Surge to Freedom: The End of Communist Rule in Eastern Europe.
Durham: Duke University Press.
Budrytė, Dovilė. 2013. “Lithuania,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. Encyclo-
pedia of Transitional Justice, Vol 2. New York: Cambridge University Press: 286-93.
Bulgarian Dossier Commission. 2007. Report to the 40th National Assembly, Dossier
Commission, http://www.comdos.bg/floioiaAn_npeA_HapoAHOTo_cb6paHne, accessed
August 18,2013.
Bulgarian Dossier Commission. 2012a. “РЕПУБЛИКА БЪЛГАРИЯ КОМИСИЯ ЗА
РАЗКРИВАНЕ НА ДОКУМЕНТИТЕ И ЗА ОБЯВЯВАНЕ НАПРИНАДЛЕ-
ЖНОСТ НА БЪЛГАРСКИ ГРАЖДАНИ КЪМ ДЪРЖАВНА СИГУРНОСТ И
РАЗУЗНАВАТЕЛНИТЕ СЛУЖБИ НА БЪЛГАРСКАТА НАРОДНА АРМИЯ,”
(Commission of the Republic of Bulgaria for Access and Disclosure of the
Documents and Announcing Affiliations of Bulgarian Citizens to the State Security
and the Intelligence Services of the Bulgarian National Army), http://www.comdos.
bg/media/Doldadi/doklad-2-2012.pdf, accessed August 15, 2013.
Bulgarian Dossier Commission. 2012b. “Обобщени данни за дейността на
КРДОПБГДСРСБНА от 5 април 2007 г. до 1 декември 2011 г). (Summary of
Activities April 5, 2007-December 1, 2011). http://www.comdos.bg/floK7iaAn„
пред_Народното_събрание, accessed June 15, 2013.
Bulgarian Dossier Commission. Various years. “Reports to the National Assembly.” The
Dossier Commission, http://www.comdos.bg/Доклади_пред_Народното_събрание,
last accessed August 16, 2013.
Bunce, Valerie. 1995. “Should Transitologists Be Grounded?” Slavic Review 54,1 (Spring):
111-27.
Center for the Study of Democracy. 2012. “Corruption and Anti-Corruption in
Bulgaria (2011-2012)” CSD Brief No 35. Sofia, Bulgaria.
Cepl, Vojtėch. 1997. “The Transformation of Hearts and Minds in Eastern Europe,”
The Cato Journal 17, 2: 229-34.
Ciobanu, Claudia. 2008. “Court Suspends Council’s Inquiries into Secret Service,”
Inter Press Service. Bucharest, Romania February 11.
Cioflâncă, Adrian. 2002. “Politics of Oblivion in Postcommunist Romania,” Romanian
Journal of Political Science 2, 2: 85-93.
Cleary, Matthew and Susan Stokes. 2006. Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism:
Political Trust in Argentina and Mexico. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cohen, Stanley. 1995. “State Crimes of Previous Regimes: Knowledge, Accountability,
and the Policing of the Past,” Law Social Inquiry 20, 1: 7-50.
Coleman, James. 1998. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American
Journal of Sociology, 94, Supplement. S95-S120.
Collier, Paul. 2007. The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and
What Can Be Done about It. New York: Oxford University Press.
Conquest, Robert. 1986. Harvest of Sorrows: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-
Famine. New York: Oxford University Press.
Consiliul Naţional pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securităţii (C.N.S.A.S.). 2010. Raport de
activitate privind anul 2010 (2010 Annual Activity Report). Bucureşti: Romania.
http://www.cnsas.ro/rapoarte.html, accessed August 10, 2013.
320 Bibliography
Consiliul Naţional pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securităţii (CN.S.A.S.). 2011. Raport de
activitate privind anul 2011 (2011 Annual Activity Report), Bucureşti, Romania.
http://www.cnsas.ro/rapoarte.html, accessed August 10, 2013.
Consiliul Naţional pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securităţii (C.N.S.A.S.). 2012. Raport de
Bucureşti, Romania, http://www.cnsas.ro/rapoarte.html, accessed August 10, 2013.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania. 1999. On the Compliance of Articles
1 and 2, Part 2 of Article 3 of the Republic of Lithuania Law “On the Assessment of
the USSR Committee of State Security (NKVD, NKGB, MGB, KGB) and Present
Activities of the Regular Employees of the Organisation. 4 March 1999.” At Consti-
tutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania website, http://www.lrkt.lt/dokumentai/
1999/n9a0304a.htm.
Cook, Karen, Russell Hardin, and Margaret Levi. 2005. Cooperation Without Trust?
New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cook, Karen, Eric Rice, and Alexandra Gerbasi. 2004. “The Emergence of Trust
Networks under Uncertainty: The Case of Transitional Economies—Insights from
Social Psychological Research,” in János Kornai, Bo Rothstein and Susan
Rose֊Ackerman, eds. Creating Social trust in Post-Socialist Transition. New York:
Palgrave/Macmillan Press: 193-212.
Coppedge, Michael. 2009. Data Used in Publications on Democratization, http://
www3.nd.edu/~mcoppedg/crd/datacrd.htm, last accessed July 7, 2015.
Council of Europe. 1996. Measures to Dismantle the Heritage of Former Communist
Totalitarian Systems. Resolution 1096. Parliamentary Assembly. Strasbourg, France:
Council of Europe.
Cywiński, Piotr. 1992. “Interview with Joachim Gauck: The Clean-Up Bureau,”
Uncaptive Minds, Summer, translated from Wprost (June 14,1992) (Summer): 123-8.
Czarnota, Adam. 2007. “The Politics of the Lustration Law in Poland, 1989-2006,” in
Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff, eds. Justice as Prevention: Vetting
Public Employees in Transitional Societies. New York: ICTJ and Social Science
Research Council: 222-58.
Dasgupta, Partha. 1988. “Trust as a Commodity,” in Diego Gambetta, ed. Trust:
Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
David, Roman. 2003. “Lustration Laws in Action: The Motives and Evaluation of
Lustration Policy in the Czech Republic and Poland (1989-2001),” Law and Social
Inquiry 28, 2: 387-489.
David, Roman. 2004. “Transitional injustice? Criteria for conformity of lustration to
the right to political expression,” Europe-Asia Studies 56, 6: 789-812.
David, Roman. 2011. Lustration and Transitional Justice: Personnel Systems in the
Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania
Press.
David, Roman. 2013. “The Czech Republic,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds.
Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press: 131-8.
de Greiff, Pablo. 2007. “Vetting and Transitional Justice,” in Alexander Mayer-Rieckh
and Pablo de Greiff, eds. Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional
Societies. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Bibliography
321
de Greiff, Pablo and Roger Duthie, eds. 2009. Transitional Justice and Development:
Making Connections. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Delhey, Jan and Kenneth Newton. 2003. “Who Trusts? The origins of social trust in
seven societies,” European Societies 5, 2: 93-137.
Demes, Pavol. 2010. Twenty Years of Western Democracy Assistance in Central and
Eastern Europe. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral
Assistance. Available at http://www.idea.int/resources/analysis/upload/Demes_
low_2.pdf.
Department of Statistics to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania (Statistics
Lithuania). 2005. “‘Population by some ethnicities by county and municipality
(2001 Census)* ” http://www.stat.gov.lt/en/lietuvos-statistikos-sistema 1, accessed
October 25, 2016.
Donovan, Todd, Carolyn Tolbert, and Dan Smith. 2009. “Political engagement, mobil-
ization and direct democracy,” Public Opinion Quarterly 73: 98-118.
Dossier Commission. 2013. “E. Kostadinov: Doubts Remain if the Commission will
close before all of the DS Files are Open,” October 12, http://www.comdos.
bg/mediite-za-nas/p/page/5/openPost/2639, last accessed June 1, 2016.
The Economist. 2007. “Poland and the Past: Tainted Vestments,” The Economist,
January 13, p. 47.
The Economist. 2014. “The Curse of Corruption in Ukraine,” The Economist
June 14, p. 49.
Ekiert, Grzegorz and Roberto Foa. 2011. “Civil Society Weakness in Post-Communist
Europe: A Preliminary Assessment.” Carlo Alberto Notebooks, Working Paper
No. 198 (January), http://www.carloalberto.org/working_papers.
Ellis, Mark. 1997. “Purging the Past: The Current State of Lustration Laws in the
Former Communist Bloc,” Law and Contemporary Problems 59, 4: 181-96.
Elster, Jon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon. 2006. “Retribution,” in Jon Elster, ed. Retribution and Reparation in the
Transition to Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press: 33-56.
EN.15MIN.LT. 2013. “Lithuania’s Lustration Commission proposes ending lustration
process,” EN.15MJN.LT, January 24, http://www.15min.lt/en/article/in-lithuania/
lithuania-s-lustration֊commission-proposes-ending-lustration-process-525-299844.
Engelbrekt, Kjell and Duncan Perry. 1992. “The Conviction of Bulgaria’s Former
Leader,” RFE/RL Research Report. Vol. 1, No. 42 (October 23).
European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission), Final
Opinion on the Law on Government Cleansing (Lustration Law) of Ukraine, Opinion
No. 788/2014, CDL-AD (2015)012, Venice, 19 June 2015.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 1986a. Case of Glasenapp v. Germany,
Judgment 9228/80. August 28, 1986. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 1986b. Case of Kosiek v. Germany,
Judgment 9704/82. August 28, 1986. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 1995. Vogt v. Germany, Final 7/1994/454/535.
September 2, 1995. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
322
Bibliography
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 1999. Rekvényi v. Hungary, Judgment
25390/94. May 20, 1999. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 2004. Case of Sidabras and Dziautas v.
Lithuania, Final 55480/00 and 59330/00. July 27, 2004. Strasbourg: Council of
Europe.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 2005. Case ofRainys and Gasparavicius v.
Lithuaniay Judgment 70665/01 and 74345/01. July 7, 2005. Strasbourg: Council of
Europe.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 2006. Case of Zdanoka v. Latvia,
Judgment 58278/00. March 16, 2006. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 2007. Case of Bobek v. Poland. 68761/01.
July 17, 2007. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 2008. Affaire Adamsons c Lettonie
(Requête no. 3669/03) Arret, Strasbourg 24 juin 2009, définitif 01/12/2008.
Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 2009. Case of 2i£kus v Lithuania.
Application no. 26652/02. Judgment, Strasbourg: Council of Europe. April 7, 2009.
European Network of Official Authorities in Charge of the Secret-Police Files. 2009.
A Reader on their Legal Foundations, Structures and Activities. Berlin: Die Bundes-
beauftragte fur die Unterlagen des Staatssicherheitsdienstes der ehemaligen
Deutschen Demokratischen Republik.
Freedom House. 2012. Nations in Transit http://www.ffeedomhouse.org/sites/default/
ffies/2012%20%20NIT%20Tables.pdf.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity.
New York: Free Press Paperbacks Book.
Gambetta, Diego. 1998. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. New York:
Basil Blackwell.
Garton-Ash, Timothy. 2000. “Trials, Purges and History Lessons in History of the
Present” in History of the Present: Essays, Sketches, and Dispatches from Europe
in the 1990s. Penguin: 294-314, reprinted at http://www.decommunization.org/
English/Articles/Ash.htm.
Gentle, Peter. 2012. “Left says state historical institute does ‘more harm than com-
munist s’,” PR dla Zagranicy, January 18, 2012, http://www.thenews.p1/l/9/Artykul/
83599,Left-says-state-historical-institute-does-more-harm-than-communists.
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective.
Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Gibney, Mark. 1997. “Prosecuting Human Rights Violations From a Previous Regime:
The East European Experience,” East European Quarterly 31, 1: 93-110.
Gibson, James. 2009. “Taking Stock of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa:
Assessing Citizen Attitudes through Surveys,” in Hugo Van der Merwe, Victoria
Baxter, and Audrey Chapman, eds. Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice:
Challenges for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace: 173-90.
Goldstone, Richard J. 2000. “Reconstructing Peace in Fragmented Societies,” Center
for Development Research, ZEF Bonn, Facing Ethnic Conflicts, December 14-16.
Bibliography 323
Gorbachev, Mikhail. 1987. Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World.
New York: Harper and Row.
Government of Estonia. 1995. Law on Citizenship, Adopted by the Riigikogu on 19
January 1995 Proclaimed as Law by the President of Estonia, January 31, 1995.
http://www.uta.edu/cpsees/estoncit.htm.
Grigorescu, Alexandru. 2006. “The Corruption Eruption in East-Central Europe: The
Increased Salience of Corruption and the Role of Intergovernmental Organiza-
tions,” East European Politics and Societies 20, 3: 516-49.
Grodsky, Brian. 2010. The Costs of Justice: How New Leaders Respond to Previous
Rights Abuses. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hadenius, Alex and Jan Teorell. 2005. “Assessing Alternative Indices of Democracy,”
Political Concepts Working Paper Series, Committee on Concepts and Methods.
August, http://www.concepts-methods.org/.
Halami, Gábor and Kim Lane Scheppele. 1997. “Living Well is the Best Revenge: The
Hungarian Approach to Judging the Past,” in A. James McAdams, ed. Transitional
Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre
Dame Press: 155-84.
Hardin, Russell. 1998. “Trust in government,” in Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret
Levi, eds. Trust in Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 9-27.
Hardin, Russell. 1999. “Do we want trust in government?” in Mark Warren, ed.
Democracy and Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press: 22-41.
Hardin, Russell. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hardin, Russell. 2003. “Gaming trust,” in Elinor Ostrom and James Walker, eds. Trust
and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research. New York:
Russell Sage Foundation: 80-101.
Hardin, Russell. 2004. “Distrust: Manifestations and Management,” in Russell Hardin,
ed. Distrust. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 3-33.
Harré, Rom. 1999. “Trust and its surrogates: psychological foundations of political
process,” in Mark Warren, ed. Democracy and Trust. New York: Cambridge
University Press: 249-72.
Hatschikjan, Magarditsch, ed. 2004. Past and Present: Consequences for Démocratisa-
tion. Proceedings of the Seminar Organised within the Project Disclosing hidden
history: Lustration in the Western Balkans. July 2-4, 2004. Center for Democracy
and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe.
Havel, Václav. 1985. Power of the Powerless: Citizens against the state in Central-
eastern Europe. New York: Palach Press.
Hayner, Priscilla. 1994. “Fifteen Truth Commissions - 1974 to 1994: A Comparative
Study,” Human Rights Quarterly 16, 4: 597-655.
Hayner, Priscilla. 2001. Unspeakable Truths: Facing the Challenge of Truth Commissions.
New York: Routledge Press.
Hayner, Priscilla. 2011. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of
Truth Commissions. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge Press.
Hodgson, Robert 2012. “Communist-era files in limbo again,” The Budapest Times, March 23.
http://www.budapesttimeshu/2012/03/23/communist-era-files-in-limbo-again/.
324
Bibliography
Home, Cynthia M. 2009a. “International Legal Rulings on Lustration Policies in Central
and Eastern Europe: Rule of Law in Historical Context,” Law Social Inquiry 34, 3:
713-44.
Horne, Cynthia M. 2009b. “Late Lustration Programs in Romania and Poland:
Supporting or Undermining Democratic Transitions?” Democratization 16, 2: 344-76.
Home, Cynthia M. 2012. “Assessing the Impact of Lustration on Trust in Public
Institutions and National Government in Central and Eastern Europe.” Compara-
tive Political Studies 45, 4: 412-46.
Home, Cynthia M. 2014. “The Impact of Lustration on Democratization in Post-
Communist Countries,” International Journal of Transitional Justice 8, 3: 496-521.
Home, Cynthia. 2015. “Silent Lustration: Public Disclosures as Informal Lustration
Mechanisms in Bulgaria and Romania,” Problems of Post-Communism 62 (May):
131-44.
Home, Cynthia and Margaret Levi. 2004. “Does Lustration Promote Trustworthy
Governance? An Exploration of the Experience of Central and Eastern Europe,”
in János Komái and Susan Rose-Ackerman, eds. Building a Trustworthy State in
Post-Socialist Transition. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan Press.
Howard, Marc Morjé. 2002. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hristov, Hristo and Alexander Kashumov. 2012. “Justice and accountability mechan-
isms in Bulgaria in the transition period (1989-2008),” in Vesselin Popovski and
Monica Serrano, eds. After oppression: Transitional justice in Latin America and
Eastern Europe. Tokyo: United Nations Press: 273-97.
Human Rights Organization. 2012. “In Memory of Galina Starovoitova.” Rights in
Russia. 20 November, http://hro.rightsinrussia.info/archive/politicians/starovoitova/
in-memory, accessed August 14, 2014.
Human Rights Watch. 2014. “Ukraine: New Law Violates Judicial Independence.”
April 10. http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/04/09/ukraine-new-law-violates-judicial-
independence, accessed August 5, 2014.
Humanitarian Law Center. 2011. “Vetting,” Humanitarian Law Center. Documentation
and Memory, http://www.rbf.org/grantees/humanitarian-law-center-documentation-
and-memory.
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth
Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Huyse, Luc. 1995. “Justice after Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in
Dealing with the Past,” Law Social Inquiry 20, 1: 51-78.
Iancu, Bogdan. 2010. “Post-Accession Constitutionalism with a Human Face: Judicial
Reform and Lustration in Romania,” European Constitutional Law Review 6,1:28-58.
Iliev, Nick. 2008. “66 secret service personnel in Bulgarian National Radio revealed,”
The Sofia Echo. December 18.
Imholz, Kathleen. 1993. “A Landmark Constitutional Court Decision in Albania,”
East European Constitutional Review 2, 3: 23-5.
Imholz, Kathleen, trans. 2004a. Law Nr. 7666 dated 26.1.1993 “On the Creation of a
Commission to Re-assess Licenses for the Exercise of Advocacy and for an Amendment
Bibliography
325
to Law Nr. 7541 dated 18.12.1991 -On Advocacy in the Republic of Albania,” http://
www.lustration.net/albania_documentation.pdf, accessed July 31, 2014.
Imholz, Kathleen, trans. 2004b. Law Nr. 8001, dated 22 September 1995, “On
Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity Committed in Albania during the
Communist Regime for Political, Ideological and Religious Reasons” (the Genocide
Law), see http://wwwJlustration.net/albania_documentation.pdf, accessed July 31,2014.
Imholz, Kathleen, trans. 2004c. Law Nr. 8043, dated 30 November 1995, “On the
Control of the Moral Figure of Officials and Other Persons Connected with the
Protection of the Democratic State” (The Verification Law), see http://www.lustra
tion.net/albania_documentation.pdf, accessed July 31, 2014.
Ingelhart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic,
and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ingelhart, Ronald. 1999. “Trust, well-being and democracy,” in Mark Warren, ed.
Democracy and Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press: 88-120.
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej. 2012. Informacja O Działalności Instytut Pamięci
Narodowej—Komisji Ścigania Zbrodni Przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu. Warsawa 2012.
Janos, Andrew. 2000. East Central Europe in the Modem World. Stanford: Stanford
University Press.
Jaskovska, Eva and John Moran. 2006. “Justice of Politics? Criminal, Civil and Political
Adjudication in the Newly Independent Baltic States,” Journal of Communist
Studies and Transition Politics 22, 4: 485-506.
Johnston, Michael. 2006. Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth, Power and Democracy.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaase, Max. 1999. “Interpersonal Trust, Political Trust and Non-institutionalised
Political Participation in Western Europe,” West European Politics 22, 3: 1-21.
Kaminski, Marek and Monika Nalepa. 2006. “Judging Transitional Justice:
A New Criterion for Evaluating Truth Revelation Procedures,” Journal of Conflict
Resolution 50, 3: 383-408.
Khrushchev, Nikita. 1970. Khrushchev Remembers. Trans. Strobe Talbott. Boston:
Little, Brown and Company.
Kiss, Csilla. 2006. “The Misuses of Manipulation: The Failure of Transitional Justice in
Post-Communist HungaryEurope-Asia Studies 58, 6: 925-40.
Kiss, Csilla. 2009. “Transitional Justice—The (Re)Construction of Post-communist
Memory,” in Éne Kőressar, Epp Kauk and Kristin Kuutma, eds. The Burden of
Remembering. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Kiss, Csilla. 2013. “Hungary,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. Encyclopedia
of Transitional Justice, Vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press: 230-6.
Komái, János and Susan Rose- Ackerman, eds. 2004. Building a Trustworthy State in
Post-Socialist Transition. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan Press.
Komái, János, Bo Rothstein and Susan Rose-Ackerman, eds. 2004. Creating Social
Trust in Post-Socialist Transition. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan Press.
Kosc, Wojciech. 2005. “Poland: Wildstein s List,” Transitions Online, Policy Briefs, 1-7
February, http://www.tol.org/client/article/13493-wüdsteins-Hst.html?print, accessed
February 4, 2014.
326
Bibliography
Kostadinov, Petar. 2008. "Communist-era secret agents: Bulgarian National Television
journalists exposed,” The Sofia Echo, November 26.
Kostadinov, Petar. 2009. "Keeping the ‘bad’ guys out,” The Sofia Echo, September 4.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon
with Former Regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Studies,
Vol. 1, 2, and 3.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995a. Bulgaria: Constitutional Court Decision on the Panev Law,
Constitutional Court Case No. 32, Decision No. 1 (February 11, 1993), In. Transi-
tional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Voi 3.
Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Studies: 300-2.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995b. Bulgaria: Law on Banks and Credit Activity, No. 25 of March 18,
1992. In. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former
Regimesy Voi 3. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Studies: 293.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995c. Bulgaria: Law for Temporary Introduction of Some Additional
Requirements for the Members of the Executive Bodies of Scientific Organizations
and the Higher Certifying Commission ("Panev Law”). December 9, 1992. In
Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former RegimeSy
Voi 3. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Studies: 296-9.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995d. Czech and Slovak Federal Republic: Screening ("Lustration”)
Law, Act No. 451/1991 (October 4, 1991). In Transitional Justice: How Emerging
Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Voi 3. Washington, DC: United States
Institute of Peace Studies: 312-21.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995e. Czech Republic: Constitutional Court Decision on the Screening
Law (November 26, 1992). In Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies
Reckon with Former Regimesy Voi 3. Washington, DC: United States Institute of
Peace Studies: 351.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995f. Czech Republic: Law on the Mitigation of the Consequences of
Certain Property Losses ("Small Restitution Law”) Act No. 403/1990, October 2,
1990; and Law on Extrajudicial Rehabilitation (“Large Restitution Law”)
February 21, 1991, In Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with
Former Regimes, Voi 3. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Studies.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995g. Czech Republic: Speech by Petr Toman, Spokesman of the
Parliamentary Investigative Commission for the Clarification of the Events of
November 17, 1989, to the Czechoslovak Federal Assembly on March 22 1991. In
Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes,
Voi. 3. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Studies: 307-11.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995h. Hungary: Law on Background Checks to Be Conducted on
Individuals Holding Certain Important Positions, Law No. 23 (March 8, 1994).
In Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes,
Voi 3. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Studies: 418-25.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995i. Lithuania: Decree Banning KGB Employees and Informers from
Government Positions. Decree No. 418 (October 12, 1991). In Transitional Justice:
How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Voi 3. Washington, DC:
United States Institute of Peace Studies: 427.
Bibliography
327
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995). Lithuania: Law on the Procedures and conditions of the
Restoration of the Right of Ownership of Existing Real Property, June 18, 1991, In
Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Vol
3. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Studies: 770-82.
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995k. Lithuania: Law on the Verification of Mandates of Those
Deputies accused of Consciously Collaborating with Special Services of Other States.
Law No. 1-2115 (December 17, 1991). In Transitional Justice: How Emerging
Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Vol 3. Washington, DC: United States
Institute of Peace Studies: 428-31.
Kritz, Neil. 1997. “Coming to Terms with Atrocities: A Review of Accountability
Mechanisms for Mass Violations of Human Rights,” Law and Contemporary
Problems 20, 1: 7-50.
Kritz, Neil. 2009. “Policy Implications of Empirical Research on Transitional Justice,”
in Hugo Van der Merwe, Victoria Baxter, and Audrey Chapman, eds. Assessing the
Impact of Transitional Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace: 13-21.
Kuzio, Taras. 2009. “Ukrainian Intelligence Promotes Lustration in Ukraine,” Eurasia
Daily Monitor 6, 108 (June 5), http://www.jamestown.org/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_
news%5D=35090 tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=381.
Latvian Constitutional Court (Satversmes tiesa). 2000. Case No. 2000-03-01, Judgment
August 30, 2000.
Latvian Constitutional Court (Satversmes tiesa). Case No. 2004-13-0106, Judgment,
March 22, 2005, http://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2004/06/2004-
13-0106_Spriedums_ENG-1 .pdf.
Latvijas Statistika, Available Tables on Population-Number and Change. http://www.
csb.govlv/en/statistikas-temas/metodologija/number-population-and-key-demographic-
indicators-36808.html, accessed September 12, 2012.
Law for Access and Disclosure of the Documents and Announcing Affiliations of
Bulgarian Citizens to the State Security and the Intelligence Services of the Bulgarian
National Army. 2006. Bulgarian law portal http://lex.bg/bg/laws/ldoc/2135540283,
accessed September 26, 2013.
Law of Ukraine No. 1188-VII, “On Restoring Confidence in the Judiciary in Ukraine,”
Verkhovna Rada (WR), 2014, No. 23, st. 870, [in Ukrainian], Act of 8 April 2014.
http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1188-18/, accessed October 14, 2016.
Law of Ukraine No. 1682-VII, “On the Law on Government Cleansing (Lustration
Law),” Verkhovna Rada (WR), 2014, No. 44, st. 2041, [in Ukrainian], Act of April 8,
2014. http://zakon4.rada.gov/uaAaws/show/1682-18/, accessed September 25, 2016.
Ledeneva, Alena. 2008. Russia's Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking and Informal
Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leskiewicz, Rafal and Pavel Žaček, eds. 2013. Handbook of the European Network of
Official Authorities in Charge of the Secret Police Files. The Institute for the Study of
Totalitarian Regimes in cooperation with the Institute of National Remembrance.
Prague.
Letki, Natalia. 2002. “Lustration and Démocratisation in East-Central Europe,”
Europe-Asia Studies 54, 4: 529-52.
328
Bibliography
Levi, Margaret. 1996. “Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam's
Making Democracy Work” Politics and Society 24 (March): 45-55.
Levi, Margaret. 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Levi, Margaret. 1998. “A State of Trust,” in Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret Levi, eds.
Trust in Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 77-101.
Levi, Margaret and Laura Stoker. 2000. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness,” Annual
Review of Political Science 3: 475-507.
Leviev-Sawyer, Clive. 2011a. “Bulgaria's Parliament Approves First Reading of
Changes to Diplomatic Service Act,” The Sofia Echo. June 23.
Leviev-Sawyer, Clive. 2011b. “Dispatching Diplomats,” The Sofia Echo, January 21.
Leviev-Sawyer, Clive. 2011c. “Ringing the Changes,” The Sofia Echo, January 28.
Leviev-Sawyer, Clive. 2012a. “The Dossiers Dossier,” The Sofia Echo, February 17.
Leviev-Sawyer, Clive. 2012b. “Eleven out of 15 members of Bulgarian Orthodox Church's
Holy Synod worked for communist State Security,” The Sofia Echo, January 17.
Leviev-Sawyer, Clive. 2012c. “Men in Black: What did Bulgarian Orthodox Church
Clergy Do while Spying for the Communist State?,” The Sofia Echo, January 18.
Lós Maria. 1995. “Lustration and Truth Claims: Unfinished Revolutions in Central
Europe,” Law Social Inquiry 20, 1: 117-61.
Lós Maria and Andrzej Zybertowicz. 2000. Privatizing the Police State: The Case of
Poland. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and Power. Chichester: John Wiley Sons Inc.
Lutz, Ellen and Kathryn Sikkink. 2001. “The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and
Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America,” Chicago Journal of
International Law 2, 1: 1-34.
Maxfield, ed. 2013. “Romania,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. Encyclopedia
of Transitional Justice, Vol 2. New York: Cambridge University Press: 7-14.
Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff, eds. 2007. Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public
Employees in Transitional Societies. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander. 2007. “On Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transi-
tional Reforms,” in Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff, eds. Justice as
Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies. New York: Social
Science Research Council: 482-521.
Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander and Roger Duthie. 2009. “Enhancing Justice and Develop-
ment through Justice-Sensitive Security Sector Reform,” in Pablo de Greiff and
Roger Duthie, eds. Transitional Justice and Development: Making Connections.
New York: Social Science Research Council: 214-48.
McAdams, A. James. 1997. “Communism on Trial: The East German Past and the
German Future,” in McAdams, ed. Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in
New Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press: 239-67.
McLaughlin, Daniel. 2006. “Thousands may lose job in Polish ‘puige',” Irish Times, p. 9.
Medrano, Jaime Diez. 2010 “Interpersonal Trust,” World Values Survey Archive and
(ASEPJDS), 4, available at: http://www.jdsurvey.net/jds/jdsurveyMaps.jsp?Idioma=
I SeccionTexto=0404 NOID-104, accessed July 4, 2016.
Bibliography
329
Metodiev, Momchil. 2010. The Orthodox Church and the Communist State in Bulgaria
(1944-198). Sofia: the Institute for Studies of the Recent Past, Open Society Institute
and Ciela Publishers.
Metodiev, Momchil. 2013. “Bulgaria,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds.
Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice, Voi 2. New York: Cambridge University
Press: 73-9.
Michnik, Adam, and Václav Havel. 1993. “Justice or Revenge,” Journal of Democracy 4,
1: 20-7.
Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after
Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.
Minow, Martha. 2008. “Making History or Making Peace: When Prosecutions Should
Give Way to Truth Commissions and Peace Negotiations,” Journal of Human Rights
7, 2: 174-85.
Mishler, William and Rose, Richard. 1995. Trust, Distrust, and Skepticism about
Institutions of Civil Society, Studies in Public Policy No. 252. Glasgow, Centre for
the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.
Mishler, William and Rose, Richard. 2001. “What Are the Origins of Political Trust?
Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies,” Comparative
Political Studies 34, 1: 30-62.
Montinola, Gabriella. 2009. “Proxies and Experience as Bases of Trust in Courts,” in
Karen Cook, Margaret Levi, Russell Hardin, eds. Whom Can We Trust? How
Groups, Networks, and Institutions Make Trust Possible. New York: Russell Sage
Foundation: 286-307.
Moran, John. 1994. “The Communist Tortures of Eastern Europe: Prosecute and
Punish or Forgive and Forget?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies
27, 1: 95-109.
Moyo, Dambisa. 2010. Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better
Way for Africa. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Myers, Steven Lee. 2002. “A Russian Crime Drama Deepens with Arrests,” The
New York Times, November 21.
Naegele, Joylon. 2002. “Hungary: Prime Minister Says He Was A Counterespionage
Agent,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty On-line Reportsy June 19.
Najfeld, Joanna. 2007. “Poland’s New ‘Lustration’ Law Has Some Journalists Nervous,”
Polish Radio External Service, March 12, http://www.ffeerepublic.com/focus/
f-news/1799590/posts, last accessed March 24, 2014.
Nalepa, Monika. 2010. Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist
Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nalepa, Monika. 2013. “Lustration,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. Encyclo-
pedia of Transitional Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press: 46-51.
Nedelsky, Nadya. 2004. “Divergent Responses to a Common Past: Transitional Justice
in the Czech Republic and Slovakia,” Theory and Society 33: 65-115.
Nedelsky, Nadya. 2009. “Czechoslovakia and the Czech and Slovak Republics,” in
Lavinia Stan, ed. Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union:
Reckoning with the Communist Past. New York: Routledge Press: 37-75.
330
Bibliography
Nedelsky, Nadya. 2013. “Slovak Republic,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky,
eds. Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press:
433-9.
Neff, Michael. 1992. “Eastern Europe's Policy of Restitution of Property in the 1990s”
as excerpted in Neil Kritz, ed. 1995. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies
Reckon with Former Regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace
Studies: 685-7.
Newton, Kenneth. 2007. “Social and Political Trust,” in Russell Dalton and
Hans·֊Dieter Klingemann, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford:
Oxford University Press: 342-61.
O'Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian
Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: The Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Offe, Claus. 1992. “Coming to Terms with Past Injustices: An Introduction to Legal
Strategies Available in Post-communist Societies,” Archives Européennes de
Sociologie 33, 1: 195-201.
Offe, Claus. 1996. Varieties of Transition: The East European and East German
Experience. London: Cambridge University Press.
Offe, Claus. 1999. “How Can We Trust Our Fellow Citizens,” in Mark Warren, ed.
Democracy and Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press: 42-87.
Olsen, Tricia, Leigh Payne, and Andrew Reiter. 2010. Transitional Justice in Balance:
Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of
Peace Press.
Olsen, Tricia, Leigh Payne, Andrew Reiter, and Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm. 2010.
“Why Truth Commissions Improve Human Rights,” The International Journal of
Transitional Justice 4, 3: 457-76.
Oltay, Edith. 1994. “Hungary's Screening Law.” RFE/RL Research Report. Vol. 3, No. 15,
April 15.
OSCE/ODIHR Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. 2007. Republic
of Latvia Parliamentary Elections 7 October 2006: OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election
Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw, Poland, February 8, 2007.
Owen, Gerald. 2007. “A Revolution Purges Its Own,” National Post, January 12.
Oxford English Dictionary. 2016. “Lustration,” On-line version, http://www.oed.com.
ezproxy.library.wwu.edu/view/Entry/ 111 398?redirectedFrom=lustration#eid.
Paczolay, Peter. 1992. “Judicial Review of Compensation Law in Hungary,” excerpted
from Michigan Journal of International Law 13,3, in Neil Kritz, ed. 1995 Transitional
Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. Washington, D.C.:
United States Institute of Peace Studies: 652-3.
Paczynska, Agnieszka. 2005. “Inequality, Political Participation, and Democratic
Deepening in Poland,” East European Politics and Societies 19, 4: 573-613.
Parliament of Romania. 2006. Draft Law on Lustration, the temporary restriction of
access to some public functions and dignities of people who were part of the power
structures and the repressive apparatus of the communist regime. Joint Report with
Chamber of Deputies. No. 31/463/2006 and No. 25/334/2006, Bucharest, Romania.
Bibliography
331
Patterson, Orlando. 1999. “Democracy and Social Capital,” in Mark Warren, ed.
Democracy and Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press: 121-50.
Pettai, Eva-Clarita. 2013. “Center for the Documentation of the Consequences of
Totalitarianism/Totalitārisma seku dokumentēšanas centrs (Latvia),” in Lavinia
Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice, Vol 3.
New York: Cambridge University Press: 26-31.
Pettai, Eva-Clarita and Velio Pettai. 2014. Transitional and Retrospective Justice in the
Baltic States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pettai, Velio. 2013. “Estonia,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. Encyclopedia
of Transitional Justice, Vol 2. New York: Cambridge University Press: 161-7.
Piasecka, Agnieszka. 2014. Summary of Legislative Work on Lustration Act No. 4359
‘On Purification of Government/ The Open Dialogue Foundation, November 19.
Platt, Alexander, Ladak Imtiaz, Goodman, Alan, and Nicely, Matthew. 1992.
“Compensating Former Political Prisoners: An Overview of Developments in
Central and Eastern Europe,” as excerpted in Neil Kritz, ed. 1995. Transitional
Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. Washington, DC:
United States Institute of Peace Studies: 691-2 (original is unpublished paper).
Polish Constitutional Tribunal (Trybunal Konstytucyjny). 2007. Constitutional Court
Judgment of May 11, 2007, file Ref. No. K 2/07 LUSTRATION.
Polityka. 2006. “Polish Report Views Impact of Secret Service Reforms, ‘Unprece-
dented Suspicion/” Polityka in BBC Monitoring European* November 4.
Popova, Maria. 2014. “Why Kiev’s Plans to Purge the Judiciary Will Backfire,” Foreign
Affairs, April 15.
Posner, Eric and Adrian Vermeule. 2004. “Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice,”
Harvard Law Review 117, 3: 761-825.
PR dla Zagranicy. 2012. “Left Calls for End to National Remembrance Institute,”
January 16, 2012, http://www.thenews.pl/1/9/Artykul/83444,Left-calls-for-end-to-
National-Remembrance-Institute.
Priban, Jiri. 2007. “Oppressors and Their Victims: The Czech Lustration Law and the
Rule of Law,” in Alexander Mayer-Riechkh and Pablo de Greiff, eds. Justice as
Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies. New York: Social
Science Research Council: 308-47.
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.
New York: Simon Schuster.
Radio Romania International. 2006. “The Lustration Law Under Public Debate,”
May 12.
Raiser, Martin, Alan Rousso, and Franklin Steves. 2004. “Measuring Trust in Transition:
Preliminary Findings from 26 Transition Economies,” in János Komai, Bo Rothstein
and Susan Rose-Ackerman, eds. Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition.
New York: Palgrave/Macmillan Press: 55-70.
Ramet, Sabrina. 1995. Social Currents in Eastern Europe: The Sources and
Consequences of the Great Transformation. Durham: Duke University Press.
332
Bibliography
Ramet, Sabrina, ed. 1998. Eastern Europe: Politics, Culture, and Society Since 1939.
Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
Republic of Lithuania. 1999. Law on Registering Confession, Entry into Records and
Protection of Persons who have Admitted to Secret Collaboration with Special Services
of the Former USSR, November 23,1999, No. VIII-1436, Vilnius. Official Translation.
From website of Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, http://www.parliament.ge/files/
437_1262_432392_lustrationlawLithuania.pdf, last accessed June 6, 2016.
RFE/RL. 1998. “Lithuanian Lawmakers Back Adamkus Over Lustration Law,” RFE/RL,
July 17.
RFE/RL. 1998. “Lithuanian Parliament Passes Lustration Law,” RFE/RL Central and
Eastern Europe, June 29.
RFE/RL. 1998. “Lithuanian President Not to Sign Lustration Law.” RFE/RL Newsline,
July 10.
RFE/RL. 1999. “Lithuania Places Job Restrictions on 87 Former KGB Operatives,”
RFE/RL Newsline, November 18.
RFE/RL. 1999. “Lithuanian President Delays Forming ‘Lustration’ Commission and
Lithuanian President to Wait for Court Ruling on Lustration Law,” RFE/RL Central
and Eastern Europe, January 5.
RFE/RL. 1999. “Lithuanian Publishes Lists of Jobs Off-Limits for Former KGB
Employees.” RFE/RL Central and Eastern Europe, January 15.
RFE/RL. 2000. “Czech Lower House Prolongs Lustration Laws,” RFE/RL Newsline,
September 22.
RFE/RL. 2000. “Lithuanians Acknowledge KGB Links,” RFE/RL Baltic States Report,
Vol. 1, No. 28, August 16.
RFE/RL. 2000. “Slovak Premier Says Lustration Behind Country’s Problems,” RFE/RL
NEWSLINE, October 2.
RFE/RL. 2000. “Some 1,500 Lithuanians Confess to KGB Links,” RFE/RL Newsline,
Vol. 2, No. 28, August 8.
RFE/RL. 2001. “Constitutional Court Rejects Plea to Abolish Lustration Laws,” RFE/
RL, Vol. 2, No. 49, December 13.
RFE/RL. 2001. “Slovak Official Fears Former Communist Secret Service Agents
Employed in Sensitive Positions,” RFE/RL Newsline, June 7.
RFE/RL. 2002. “Are Former StB Agents Running on SNS Lists in Slovak Elections?”
RFE/RL Newsline Vol. 6, No. 154, August 16.
RFE/RL. 2002. “As Coalition Demands Guarantees on Screening Law,” RFE/RL Newsline,
July 1.
RFE/RL. 2002. “AS Poll Reiterates that Public Doesn’t Care,” RFE/RL Newsline, Vol. 6,
No. 180, September 24.
RFE/RL. 2002. “Hungarian Opposition Criticizes Vetting Bills,” RFE/RL Newsline,
Vol. 6, No. 172, September 12.
RFE/RL. 2002. “Hungary’s FIDESZ Says Mecs Commission Running ‘Politically
Amok,” RFE/RL Newsline, Vol. 6, No. 164, Part II, August 30.
RFE/RL. 2002. “NATO Dissatisfied with Slovak Vetting Process,” RFE/RL Newsline,
January 31.
Bibliography 333
RFE/RL· 2002. “Slovak Parliament Overrides Presidential Veto,” RFE/RL Newsline,
Vol. 6, No. 157, August 21.
RFE/RL. 2002. “Slovakia Makes Files from Communist and Nazi Eras Public,” RFE/RL
Newsliney Vol. 6, No. 128, July 11.
Robertson, David. 2003. A Problem of Their Own, Solutions of Their Own: CEE
furisdictions and the Problems of Lustration and Retroactivity. Implications of
enlargement for the rule of law and constitutionalism in post-communist legal
orders, Florence, Italy: European Union Institute.
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2009. “Forward,” in Hugo Van der Merwe, Victoria Baxter, and
Audrey Chapman, eds. Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Washington,
DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
Romanian Constitutional Court (Curtea Constituţională a României). 2008. Decision
No, 51 of January 31, 2008.
Romanian Constitutional Court (Curtea Constituţională a României). 2010. Constitu-
tional Court Decision No. 820/2010, on the objection of unconstitutionality of
provision of the lustration law, as published in the Official Gazette, No. 420 of
June 23, 2010.
Rose, Richard. 1998. New Democracies Barometer V: A 12 Nation Study. Studies in
Public Policy No. 306. Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strath-
clyde, Glasgow.
Rose, Richard. 2010. New Europe Barometer I-XV Trend Dataset, 1991-2007.
[computer file]. 2nd Edition. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor],
July 2010. SN: 5241.
Rose, Richard, William Mishler, and Christian Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and its
Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins
University Press.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2001. “Trust and Honesty in Post-socialist Societies,” Kyklos
54, 2-3: 415-43.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2004. “Public Participation in Consolidating Democracies:
Hungary and Poland,” in János Komái and Susan Rose-Ackerman, eds. Building
a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan
Press: 9-28.
Rosenberg, Tina. 1995. “Overcoming the Legacies of Dictatorship,” Foreign Affairs 74,
3: 134-53.
Rothstein, Bo. 2004. “Social Trust and Honesty in Government: A Causal Mechanisms
Approach,” in János Komái, Bo Rothstein and Susan Rose-Ackerman, eds. Creating
Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan Press:
13-30.
Rothstein, Bo. 2011. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and
Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rothstein, Bo and Daniel Eek 2009. “Political Corruption and Social Trust,” Rationality
and Society 21, 1: 81-112.
Rothstein, Bo and Dietlind Stolle. 2008. “The State and Social Capital: An Institutional
Theory of Generalized Trust,” Comparative Politics 40, 4: 441-59.
334
Bibliography
Rothstein, Bo and Eric Uslaner. 2005. “All for All: Equality, Corruption, and Social
Trust,” World Politics 58, 1: 41-72.
Sajó, András. 2004. “Neutral Institutions: Implications for Government Trustworthi-
ness in East European Democracies,” in János Komai and Susan Rose֊Ackerman,
eds. Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition. New York: Palgrave/
Macmillan Press: 29-51.
Särkin, Jeremy and Erin Daly. 2004. “Too Many Questions, Too Few Answers:
Reconciliation in Transitional Societies,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 35,
3: 661-728.
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1994. “The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Conso-
lidationists; How Far to the East Should They Attempt to Go?” Slavic Review 53,
1:173-85.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper
Colophon Books.
Schwartz, Herman. 1995. “Lustration in Eastern Europe,” in Neil Kritz, ed. Transi-
tional Justice Transitional Justice. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace
Studies, Vol. Ill: 461-83.
Seligman, Adam. 1997. The Problem of Trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are
Changing World Politics. W.W. Norton Company.
Sikkink, Kathryn and Carrie Booth Walling. 2006. “Argentina’s Contribution to
Global Trends in Transitional Justice,” in Naomi Roht-Arriaza and Javier Mariez-
currena, eds. Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth and
Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press: 301-24.
Šiklová, Jirina. 1996. “Lustration or the Czech Way of Screening,” East European
Constitutional Review 5 (Winter): 57-62.
Šimonovic, Ivan. 2004. “Attitudes and Types of Reaction Toward Past War Crimes and
Human Rights Abuses,” Yale Journal of International Law 29: 343-61.
Simpson, John and Jennifer Speake, eds. 2008. Oxford Dictionary of Proverbs.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Sissons, Miranda and Abdulrazzaq Al-Saiedi. 2013. “A Bitter Legacy: Lessons of
DeBaathihcation in Iraq,” International Center for Transitional Justice. March.
https://www.ictj.org/publication/bitter-Iegacy-lessons-de-baathiikation-iraq.
Skapska, Grażyna. 2003. “Moral Definitions of Constitutionalism in East Central
Europe: Facing Past Human Rights Violations,” International Sociology 18, 1:
199-218.
Smidova, Jana. 1991. “Interview with Stanislav Devaty: The Files Weren't Destroyed,”
Uncaptive Minds Spring: 56-8.
Smith, Craig. 2006. “Eastern Europe Still Struggles to Purge Its Security Services,”
The New York Times, International Section, December 12.
Smith, Craig. 2007. “New Warsaw Archbishop Quits Over Communist Collabor-
ation,” The New York Times, International section, January 8.
Social Barometer. 2013. The Committee for Disclosing the Documents and Announcing
Affiliations of Bulgarian Citizens to the State Security and Intelligence Services of
Bibliography
335
the Bulgarian National Army, 2008-2012. Social Barometer, National Centre
for Public Opinion Surveyy http://wwwxomdos.bg/Co^o/iorMHecKH_6apoMeri p
accessed August 10, 2013.
Sofia Echo. 2009. “Keeping the Bad Guys Out,” September 4.
Sofia Echo. 2011. “Controversy over Bulgarian Orthodox Church Agreement to be
Checked by Dossier Commission,” December 16.
Sofia Echo. 2011. “Missions Impossible,” July 29.
Sofia Echo. 2011. “More Bulgarian Diplomats Outed as Communist Era Agents,”
March 17.
Sofia Echo. 2012. “Bulgaria Edges Closer to Checking Credit Millionaires,” March 8.
Sofia Echo. 2012. “Bulgaria’s Dossier Commission Names Academics Who Spied for
Communist Secret Services,” March 14.
Sofia Echo. 2012. “Bulgarian MPs Vote for Check into Credit Millionaires’ Communist
Secret Service Links,” April 4.
Sofia Echo. 2012. “Media Campaign to Discredit Bulgarian Orthodox Church Is
Failing, Plovdiv Metropolitan Says,” March 18.
Sofia Echo. 2012. “Mixed Reaction to Disclosures about Bulgaria’s Communist-era
Spies in the Church, Poll Says,” March 5.
Sólyom, Laszló. 2003. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Transition to Democracy:
With Special Reference to Hungary,” International Sociology 18, 1: 133-61.
Stan, Lavinia. 2002. “Moral Cleansing Romanian Style,” Problems of Post-Communism
49, 4: 52-62.
Stan, Lavinia. 2004. “The Romanian Anticorruption Bill,” Studies in Post~Communismy
Centre for Post-Communist Studies, St. Francis Xavier University, Occasional Paper
no. 6.
Stan, Lavinia. 2006a. “The Politics of Memory in Poland: Lustration, File Access and
Court Proceedings,” Studies in Post-Communism Occasional Paper, No. 10.
St. Francis Xavier University, Centre for Post-Communist Studies.
Stan, Lavinia. 2006b. “The Roof over Our Head: Property Restitution in Romania,”
Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22, 2: 180-205.
Stan, Lavinia. 2010. “Romanian Parliamentary Arguments for Lustration,” March 25,
http://laviniastan.wordpress.corn/2010/03/25/rornanian-parliamentary-arguments-
for-lustration-2005-2007/. Last accessed April 20, 2012.
Stan, Lavinia. 2011a. “The Urge to Purge: The Case For and Against Lustration.”
LaviniaStan blog, https://laviniastan.wordpress.com/2011/03/ll/the-urge-to-purge-
the-case-for-and-against-lustration/ March 11.
Stan, Lavinia. 2011b. “Vigilante Justice in Post-Communist Europe,” Communist and
Post-Communist Studies 44, 4: 319-27.
Stan, Lavinia. 2012a. “Witch-Hunt or Moral Rebirth? Romanian Parliamentary
Debates on Lustration,” East European Politics and Societies 26, 2: 274-95.
Stan, Lavinia. 2012b. Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Romania: The Politics of
Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stan, Lavinia, ed. 2009. Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet
Union: Reckoning with the Communist past. New York: Routledge Press.
336
Bibliography
Stan, Lavinia and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. 2013. Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice,
Volumes 1-3. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stan, Lavinia and Lucian Turcescu. 2005. “The Devil’s Confessors: Priests, Commun-
ists, Spies, and Informers.” East European Politics and Societies 19, 4: 655-85.
Stan, Lavinia and Lucian Turcescu. 2007. Religion and Politics in Post-Communist
Romania. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stolle, Dietlind. 2001. “Clubs and Congregations: The Benefits of Joining an Association,”
in Karen Cook, ed. Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 202-44.
Stolle, Dietlind. 2007. “Social Capital,” in Russell Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klinge֊
mann, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University
Press: 655-74.
Supreme Court of Ukraine. 2014. Proposals of the Supreme Court of Ukraine as to the
Draft Law “On Restoring confidence in the judicial system of Ukraine. May 3, 2014.
http://www.scourtgov.ua/clients/vsu/vsuen.nsf/(documents)/20AC4F73ClElAC95C-
2257C94002C29Bl?OpenDocument year=2014 month=03 , accessed August 6,
2014.
Sztompka, Piotr. 1998. “Trust, Distrust, and the Two Paradoxes of Democracy,”
European Journal of Social Theory 1, 1: 19-32.
Sztompka, Piotr. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Thoms, Oskar, James Ron, and Roland Paris. 2008. The Effects of Transitional Justice
Mechanisms: A Summary of Empirical Research Findings and Implications for
Analysts and Practitioners. Ottawa: Centre for International Policy Studies.
Thoms, Oskar, James Ron, and Roland Paris. 2010. “State-Level Effects of Transitional
Justice: What Do We Know?” International Journal of Transitional Justice 4, 3:
329-54.
Tilly, Charles. 2005. Trust and Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tismäneanu, Vladimir. 2008. “Democracy and Memory: Romania Confronts Its
Communist Past,” The AnnaL· of the American Academy of Political and Social
Science 617: 166-80.
Tismäneanu, Vladimir. 2012. “The Crimes of Communism Can Still Be Judged,”
http://tismaneanu.wordpress.com, April 13.
Tomiuc, Eugen. 2002. “Hungary: Government Proposes Further Opening of Communist-
Era Files,” RFE/RL Research Reports, June 27.
Travers, Suzanne and Edward Kanterian. 2001. “Casting Light on the Long Shadow
of Romania's Securitate.” http://lett.ubbcluj.ro/~echinox/caietel/18.html, accessed
May 23, 2005.
Treisman, Daniel. 2007. “What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption
from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research,” Annual Review of Political
Science 10: 211-44.
Trochev, Alexei. 2013. “Ukraine,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. Encyclo-
pedia of Transitional Justice, Vol 2. New York: Cambridge University Press: 490-7.
Tupy, Marian. 2006. “The Rise of Populist Parties in Central Europe: Big Government,
Corruption, and the Threat to Liberalism.” Development Policy Analysis. Washington,
DC: Cato Institute, Center for Global Liberty Prosperity. No. 1.
Bibliography
337
Tyler, Tom. 1998. “Trust and Democratic Governance,” in Valeria Braithwaite and
Margaret Levi, eds. Trust in Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation:
269-94.
Tyler, Tom and Yuen Huo. 2002. Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation
with the Police and Courts. New York. Russell Sage Foundation.
Ukraine General Newswire. 2015. “Venice Commission to provide final conclusion on
lustration law in June-Justice Minister,” Interfax April 3 [Kiev].
United Nations. 2006. Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An
Operational Framework. Office of the UN High Commission on Human Rights,
New York, United Nations HR/PUB/06/5.
Uslaner, Eric. 1999. “Democracy and Social Capital,” in Mark Warren, ed. Democracy
and Trust New York: Cambridge University Press: 121-50.
Uslaner, Eric. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Uslaner, Eric. 2008. Corruption, Inequality and the Rule of Law: The Bulging Pocket
Makes the Life Easy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Uslaner, Eric and Gabriel Badescu. 2004. “Honesty, Trust, and Legal Norms in
the Transition to Democracy,” in János Komai, Bo Rothstein, and Susan
Rose-Ackerman, eds. Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition. New York:
Palgrave/Macmillan Press: 31-51.
Van der Merwe, Hugo, Victoria Baxter, and Audrey Chapman. 2009. “Introduction,”
in Hugo Van der Merwe, Victoria Baxter, and Audrey Chapman, eds. Assessing the
Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research. Washington, DC:
U.S. Institute of Peace: 1-11.
Varga, László. 1997. “Watchers and the Watched,” The Hungarian Quarterly 38, 146.
Excerpted and translated from János Kenedi, Kis állambiztonsági olvasókönyv
(A Concise State Security Reader). Budapest Magvető, 1996. Vols. I-II.
Vėgelytė, Ingrida. 2005. “Liustracijos pagreičiai (Lustration Accelerations),” Bernardi-
nai. It. November 10, http://www.bernardinai.lt/straipsnis/2005-11-10-ingrida-
vegelyte-liustracijos-pagreiciai/5692.
Vėgelytė, Ingrida. 2009. “Kas išgirs teisiamus Lietuvos laisvės kovų dalyvius? Kas išgirs
teisiamus Lietuvos laisvės kovų dalyvius? Who will hear the trial in Lithuanian
freedom fighters participants?” Bernardinai.lt, October 8.
Walicki, Andrzej. 1997. “Transitional Justice and the Political Struggles of
Post-Communist Poland,” in A. James McAdams, ed. Transitional Justice and the
Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press:
185-237.
Wall Street Journal. 2007. “The Polish Inquisition,” The Wall Street JoumaU April 27,
Brussels edition.
Warren, Mark, ed. 1999. Democracy and Trust. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Warsaw Voice. 2006. “No Comeback for Gilowska?,” The Warsaw Voice, July
9-16.
Welsh, Helga. 1996. “Dealing with the Communist Past: Central and East European
Experiences after 1990,” Europe-Asia Studies 48, 3: 413-29.
338
Bibliography
Weschler, Lawrence. 1992. “The Velvet Purge: The Trials of Jan Kavan,” The
New Yorker, October 19: pp. 66-96.
Wezel, Katja. 2013. “Latvia,” in Lavinia Stan and Nadya Nedelsky, eds. Encyclopedia of
Transitional Justicey Vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press: 273-9.
Wiebelhaus-Brahm, Eric. 2010. Truth Commissions and Transitional Societies: The
Impact on Human Rights and Democracy. London: Routledge Press.
Williams, Kieran, Aleks Szczerbiak, and Brigid Fowler. 2003. “Explaining Lustration in
Eastern Europe: 'A Post-communist Politics Approach’.” SEI Working Paper 62,
Sussex European Institute.
Woehrel, Steven. 2005. “Ukraine’s Orange Revolution and U.S. Policy,” Congressional
Research Service Report for Congress. Washington, DC: The Library of Congress.
April 1. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL32845.pdf.
Yamagishi, Toshio. 2003. “Cross-Societal Experimentation on Trust: A Comparison of
the United States and Japan,” in Elinor Ostrom and James Walker, eds. Trust and
Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research. New York: Russell
Sage Foundation: 352-70.
Yamagishi, Toshio and Midori Yamagishi. 1994. “Trust and Commitment in the
United States and Japan,” Motivation and Emotion 18, 2: 129-66.
Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy,” Foreign Affairs 76, 6: 22-43.
Zake, leva. 2010. “Politicians versus Intellectuals in the Lustration Debates in
Transitional Latvia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 23, 3:
389-412.
Zielonka, Jan. 2001. Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Index
Introductory Note
References such as “178-9” indicate (not necessarily continuous) discussion of a topic across a
range of pages. Because the whole of this work is about “trust” and “lustration,” use of these
terms (and certain others which occur throughout) as entry points has been restricted. Please
look under the appropriate detailed entries. Wherever possible in the case of topics with many
references, these have either been divided into sub-topics or only the most significant discussions
of the topic are listed.
absence of lustration 50, 53, 106, 116, 148,
153-4
abuse of power 2, 269, 280
accountability 1-2, 49-50, 52, 79-80, 82, 97,
221-2, 224
mechanisms 35, 50, 189, 204, 242
moral 69
public 133, 146, 271
real 94, 100
symbolic 10, 50, 85, 95, 114
addiction problems 223
affiliations 26, 32, 35, 59, 108, 136
party 33, 71, 136, 152
agents 67, 69-70, 80, 85, 88-9, 113,
217-21, 226
active 60
secret police 60, 95, 216, 226, 270
secret service 85, 141, 146
Securitate 97, 270
Albania 106-10, 114, 116, 118, 205-6,
217-18, 248-9, 251-2
lustration run amok 108-9
purges and trials as politicized bureaucratic
change 109-10
Allamvedelmi Hatosag (AVH) 80
amnesties 17, 19, 49, 95, 298
analyses 19-20, 175, 195, 198, 251, 254-5,
273, 277
aggregate level 177, 179
cross-sectional 164, 166, 168, 171-2, 192,
195, 249, 251
individual-level 173, 198
national-level 174-6
archives 61, 63, 144-5, 200, 219, 221-2,
224, 231
historical 81, 221-3
archival materials 63, 144, 224
archival oversight 199-200
army 131-2, 147-8, 159-61, 175, 178, 196-7,
252-3, 262-3
attitudinal variables 196, 253
authoritarian transitions 1-2, 49
AVH (Allamvedelmi Hatosag) 80
Baltics 67, 69-70, 85, 90, 107, 119, 122, 223;
see also individual countries
Barahona de Brito, A. 17, 107
betrayals 3, 7, 29, 227, 229, 244, 248, 256
personal 10, 21, 39, 256
bivariate analysis of lustration programs and
interpersonal trust 260
Bulgaria 91-7, 99-103, 134-41, 215-21,
227-8, 232, 244-5, 270-1
additional transitional justice
measures 95-6
Dossier Commission 94-5, 104, 106,
135-41, 143-4, 219, 242-4, 246-7
KDS (Komitet Durzhavna Sigurnost) 92,
95, 136, 141, 219
National Army 94
Orthodox Church 245
public support for lustration 232-3
scope of disclosures 136-40
silent lustration 93-5
bureaucratic change
components of lustration 140-1, 188, 271
compulsory 11, 13, 68, 161, 182, 202,
288, 294
bureaucratic turnover 41,63,84,94,132,203-4
business leaders 91, 134
candidates 70-1, 87, 89-90, 133, 136, 138,
144, 228
political 145-6
presidential 90, 228
change
in inequality 149-50, 155, 158, 190, 192,
194, 206-7, 272-3
information 37-40
institutional see institutional change
symbolic 9-11, 34, 50, 52-3, 115, 140,
145, 288
340
Index
church 10, 24, 26, 29-30, 177-8, 248, 250-3,
262-3
attendance 252-3
Catholic 242, 244-5
Orthodox 245
trust in 244-6, 250-3
citizen engagement 214, 228, 232, 260
citizen interest 104, 224, 231-2
citizen perceptions 6, 8, 149-50, 152-3, 178,
181, 196, 198
citizen trust 28, 36, 44, 196
citizenship, requirements 73-4
Citizenship Law 66-8, 72-4
civic engagement 21, 29-30, 238, 243, 275
civil service 59, 65, 68, 87, 89, 91, 93, 241, 281
civil society 11-12, 14, 21, 192-3, 209,
275- 80, 287-8, 294
robust 4, 275, 279-80, 288, 294
strength 11, 13, 49, 53, 249-50, 254-5,
276- 80, 288
weakness 193, 275, 279
cleansing, moral 5, 33, 37, 42, 50-1, 59,
109, 132
clergy 21, 32, 145, 229, 242-6, 251
collaboration 31-2, 51-2, 76-7, 81-2, 86-8,
136-43, 146, 214-34
accuracy in collaboration
determinations 219
active 201, 215, 217, 225, 227, 247, 265
degree of 144, 217, 225
determinations 201, 215-16, 218-20
evidence of 76, 87, 136, 140, 142, 202, 246
previous 5, 51-2, 67, 70, 99
public disclosures 51, 96, 101, 294
rate of 138
reasons for 216
secret 86, 217
with secret police 33, 39, 80-1, 139,
216-21, 223, 225, 227
and social institutions 242-8
collaborators 60-1, 65-6, 70-1, 77-8, 97-9,
103-4, 218-20, 225-6
backgrounds 72,95,139,143, 201,203, 256
former 35, 47, 86, 90, 95, 138-40, 224
secret 86, 216
commitment 2, 8, 35, 38, 49, 79, 94, 281-2
comparative politics literature 187, 267, 279,
286,297
compensation 64,68, 105, 114
financial 83-4, 105
laws 84
competency 5, 24, 35-6, 40-2, 180-1,
188, 210
complicity 3, 66, 92, 203-4, 214-17, 223-9,
231, 233-60
active 214, 226
dilemmas 225-7, 248
passive 225, 227
rates 81, 218
regime 12, 14, 74, 76, 214-15, 224, 244-5,
255-6
revelations 43, 226, 266, 275, 280, 294
compulsory bureaucratic change 11, 13, 68,
161, 182, 202, 288, 294
compulsory change 52, 69, 79, 180, 224
compulsory employment bans 90
compulsory employment change 63, 82, 88,
92, 99, 141, 202
compulsory employment penalties 32, 38,
78-9, 84, 140
compulsory institutional change 21, 65, 69
compulsory lustration 51, 53, 56-75, 114,
116,159,167,283
programs 50, 154, 159, 167, 203, 206,
288, 293
compulsory programs 13, 52-3, 181, 189-90,
291-2
compulsory removal 5, 44, 81
conditional effects 8-9, 18-19, 21, 163, 165,
170, 193-4, 289
confessions 76, 87, 141, 203
consent 214
consistency 59, 75, 193
consolidated democracies 14, 269, 289
Constitutional Courts 61-2, 65, 75, 77, 82,
86-7, 98-9, 139-40
Czech Republic 36, 281
Latvia 46, 69-71, 282
Poland 46, 62, 78, 200
Romania 99-100, 143-4
constitutionality of lustration 62, 77, 87
constraints 35, 39, 84, 181, 188
external 122, 142
institutional 24, 35, 203, 241
temporal 9, 46, 199
corruption 10-13, 166-8, 206-7, 249-50,
254-5, 269-74, 276-7, 287-9
anti-corruption reforms 270
correctives 269-74
elixirs 274, 294
higher levels of 158, 170, 273-4, 286
perceptions of 149, 152, 264, 271,
273, 294
Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 152
Council of Europe 6, 41, 46, 112, 281
country classification 56-124
CPI (Corruption Perceptions Index) 152
credibility 142-3, 187-9, 246-7, 253, 266,
286, 294, 297
crimes 83, 85, 96, 100, 105, 109, 113-14, 270
economic 96, 110
political 68, 110
Index
341
cross-sectional analyses 164, 166, 168, 171-2,
192, 195, 249, 251
Czech Republic 6-9, 59-65, 79, 102, 118, 120,
216-17, 281
Constitutional Court 36, 281
file access and other transitional justice
measures 63-4
Institute for the Study of Totalitarian
Regimes 63-4
law 45, 59, 65, 133, 217
lustration policies 60-3
Czechoslovakia 15, 31, 64, 84, 101-2,
120, 123
data limitations 190, 195, 198, 248-9, 260,
265, 273
Database of Political Institutions 152
democracy 280-8
consolidated 2, 4, 13-14, 150, 269, 283,
286, 288-9, 294
control 155, 277
levels 15, 120, 288
measures 150-1, 156, 160, 166, 209,
272, 276
post-transition 120
principles 2, 36, 281
promotion 2, 6, 10, 13-14, 239, 282, 294
stability 4, 9, 188, 239
democratization 1-2, 4, 9-11, 19-21, 52-3*
150-1, 269, 279-89
effects of lustration on 123, 282
level 149, 190, 286
literature 274, 277, 291, 295-6
process 8-9, 33, 150
transitional justice in support of 269-90
demographic controls 175-7, 179
dependent variables 152-3, 160-2, 167-8,
170-2, 194-6, 204-5, 211, 292-5
deputies 60, 86, 104, 134, 137, 142
deputy ministers 94-5, 137
direct effects 21, 198, 282
disclosures see public disclosure
distrust 3-4, 28-9, 39, 181, 195, 266-7, 294;
see also trust
generalized 3, 256, 266, 294
and lustration 43-4
rational 189, 248
social 3, 266, 294
divergent effects 10-11, 234, 255, 266
differential effects 9, 170, 190
economic crimes 96, 110
economic development 1, 4, 121-2, 156, 160,
272, 274, 276
level of 149, 156, 162, 190, 194, 206,
209, 273
economic growth 171-2, 190, 206-7, 249,
254-5, 272-4, 276-7, 285-7
economic positions 99, 242
economic power 270-1
ECtHR (European Court of Human
Rights) 16, 46, 71-3, 89, 281-2
education 173, 176, 178, 197, 222, 226, 240,
262-3
levels 26, 173
effective governance 47, 151, 293
effectiveness 20, 27-8, 37, 74, 131, 179,
187, 193
government see government effectiveness
effects
differential 9, 170, 190
differentiated 9, 181, 291, 294
direct 21, 198, 282
fixed 155-6, 192, 272-3, 276, 285
indirect 9-11, 21, 149, 190, 210, 263,
269, 289
magnitude 41, 43, 52-3, 116, 274, 291,
294, 298
negative 11, 14, 17, 180-1, 206, 279,
289-90, 294
positive 9, 13, 49, 52, 181, 183, 209-10, 230
of timing 13, 154, 161, 191, 209
trust-building 11, 20,47, 109, 154, 157,
161, 167
of truth commissions 183, 295
efficacy 46, 117-18, 199, 208, 210-11, 278-9,
289, 292
reform 4, 13, 20, 269, 278, 287, 29!, 295
elected institutions 148, 162-5, 169-70,
180, 193
elected positions 59, 71, 74-5, 87-8, 99,
104, 141
Election Law 59, 70-3
elections 71, 78, 104, 108-9, 137-8, 141,
144, 146
local 71, 94, 136, 138, 144
parliamentary 60, 70, 86, 202
employees 70, 72, 94-5, 134, 137, 143,
146, 201
employers 62, 78, 87, 143, 146, 201
employment bans 46, 66, 86-7
blanket 72
compulsory 90
employment change 51, 84, 91
compulsory 63, 82, 88, 92, 99, 141, 202
employment consequences 69, 95
limited 75
mandatory 51-2, 76, 79
employment penalties 46, 59, 75, 88, 91,
139, 201
compulsory 32, 38, 78-9, 84, 140
noncompulsory 50
342
Index
employment removals 52, 62, 78, 87-8, 142,
218, 297
employment screening 30, 32, 51, 59, 139, 142
employment vetting 5-6, 10, 33, 93, 100, 141,
148, 292-3
Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice 1,
31-4, 218
endogeneity 18,119-24,289
engagement
citizen 214, 228, 232, 260
civic 21, 29-30, 238, 243, 275
equation 157, 161, 163, 208, 278, 287
Estonia 56, 58-9, 65-70, 73, 85, 87,
118-21, 195
codes 150
complementary transitional justice
measures 67-8
Implementation Act 65
oaths of conscience and citizenship
law 66-7
Estonians 68-70, 74
European Court of Human Rights see ECtHR
executives, state company 78, 200
extraordinary politics, periods of 45-6
fairness 27-8, 35, 37-8, 40, 131-2, 176,
187-8, 264
government see government fairness
perceptions 264
family members 196, 198, 223, 227
file access 37-8, 47-8, 63, 98-9, 103-5, 189,
230, 264-5
laws 64, 94, 201, 222
limited 73, 102, 112, 222
policies 91, 147
procedures 9, 12, 16, 20, 29, 39-40, 50, 61
provisions 6-7, 20-1, 34, 39, 43, 53, 106,
114-15
requests 224, 231
transparency 260
file destruction 70, 85, 144, 215
file disclosures 94, 100, 139, 144, 224, 232
file management 63, 200
file manipulation 102, 217
file oversight 221
file repositories 12, 89, 135, 144, 221
file revelations 2, 43, 219, 221, 227, 232,
256, 265
file transparency 63-4, 189, 221
file veracity 99, 142, 221
files 83-5, 98-9, 102-6, 136-40, 142-6,
200-2, 218-23, 230-3
comparison of 138
KGB 67, 111
missing 99, 217, 220
personal 98, 133, 142, 230, 264
secret 2, 73, 85
Secret-Police 94, 105
Securitate 141, 144
transferred 89
financial compensation 83-4, 105
fixed effects 155-6, 192, 272-3, 276, 285
formal lustration 51, 84, 91, 95, 147, 244
laws 73, 91, 95, 101, 109, 134
measures/programs 52,91-2,95,114
Freedom House 150-1, 156, 160, 249-50,
272, 274, 276, 283-4
gender 26, 173, 176, 178, 194, 197, 252, 262
generalized distrust 3, 256, 266, 294
generalized interpersonal trust 29, 239, 256,
259, 263, 294
generalized trust in government 187,204
generalized political trust 10, 26-8, 30, 41-2,
187, 195, 293
generalized social trust 25-6, 28-30, 238, 253,
266, 280, 294
generalized trust 10, 25-6, 29, 40, 181, 238-9,
241, 267
objects 26, 41, 53, 291
goals 1-3, 8, 11-13, 34, 36, 38, 187-8, 298
of lustration 34, 146
original 114, 132
regime 2, 9, 107
of state building and democratization
45, 62
governance 4, 7-8, 10-12, 132, 150-1, 165,
187-8, 194
effective 47, 151, 293
ineffective 4
quality of 151, 204, 206
government 9-12, 24-8, 34-9, 41-4, 187-91,
193-201, 209-11, 291-6
agencies 139-40, 200
citizen perceptions of trust in 8, 211
effective 176, 188, 209, 239, 274-5, 279
effects of lustration on trust in 189, 210
generalized nature of trust in 187, 204
individual-level determinants of
trust 194-9
institutions of 27, 189, 256
local 71, 87, 90
national 4, 86, 188-94, 281
new 8, 38-9, 43, 282
perceptions of trust in 8, 28, 176, 188-9,
194, 196, 198-9,211
post-transition 194-5, 198
significant predictor of trust in 191, 210
transitional justice and trust in 190, 192,
196-7
trustworthy 28, 187-8, 293
variation in trust in 191, 195-6, 198, 210
Index
343
government effectiveness 13, 36-7,
121-2, 158, 187-211, 274,
276-7, 293-4
levels of 120-2, 206, 209, 211, 274
and lustration 204-9
variation in 205, 209
government fairness 178, 198, 252-3, 262
perceptions of 176, 179-80
government officials 38, 81, 133
government performance 180, 193, 240
perceptions 179
government trustworthiness, perceptions
of 189, 293
guilt 48, 216, 224-5, 231, 247
historical accountability 114, 244
historical archives 81, 221-3
historical memory 12, 21, 214-34, 244
construction 225-7
and public support for lustration
227-33
reconstruction of 214-15
honesty 132
Hoxha, Enver 107
human rights 9, 17, 41, 49, 62, 113, 220
abuses 1,48,100
violations 1-2, 49, 158, 280
Hungarians 15, 133, 141, 188, 200, 215, 226,
229-30
Hungary 74-5, 80-5, 90-2, 120-1, 220-1,
224, 226-8, 230
delimited lustration 81-3
file access 222-4
historical archive 220-4
overt politicization 83-4
privacy safeguards and accountability
needs 221-4
public support for lustration 229-30
State Security 81, 221
implementation 8-9, 15-18, 51-3, 57-8,
74-7, 90-1, 105-6, 133-4
of lustration 6, 8, 15-16, 53, 90
of reforms 117-18,215
incentives 23, 27, 39, 122, 180
independence 69, 73, 80, 85, 89, 109,
150, 156
judicial 150, 152, 154, 160, 162, 166,
168, 274
independent variables 18-19, 167, 197,
271, 283
lagged 153,283
indirect effects 9-11, 21, 149, 190, 210, 263,
269, 289
individual attitudes toward public
institutions 173-80
inequality 149-50, 240, 250, 261-2, 264, 277,
279, 285-6
change in 149-50, 155, 158, 190, 192, 194,
206-7, 272-3
levels of 155, 190, 192, 194, 206-7, 272-3,
276, 279
informal lustration 50-1, 53, 91-106, 114,
134-5, 206, 277, 283
categories 75, 106, 133-4, 153
examples 21, 181, 217
measures/mechanisms/programs 20, 52,
91, 101, 105-6, 141, 154, 167
policies 117, 159
process 92, 99, 144, 147
informal networks 11,43,270,274
informants 99, 139, 144-5, 216, 218-19, 222,
226, 231
information
changes 37-40
new 28, 37-8, 132, 179, 181, 239, 266
revelations 41-3
informers 59-60, 72-4, 85-6, 93, 108, 113,
144, 216-18
part-time 92, 218
initial levels of government
effectiveness 120-1
Institute for the Study of Totalitarian
Regimes 63-4
Institute of National Remembrance 77, 199
institutional change 34-7, 97, 101, 110,
115-17, 266, 288, 291
components 9, 39, 135, 258
compulsory 21, 65, 69
reforms 20, 279, 288
institutional composites 148, 180, 189
institutional constraints 24, 35, 203, 241
institutional reforms 11, 116, 211, 288, 292
institutional trust 3, 25, 27, 176-7, 241,
256-7, 260, 263
high 176
institutional trustworthiness 27, 149,
151, 179
perceptions of 176, 179
institutions 23, 27-8, 34-6, 40-2, 131-3,
147-9, 174-5, 243-4
elected 148, 162-5, 169-70, 180, 193
of government 27, 189, 256
individual 20, 188
neutral 35
oversight see oversight institutions
of public trust 91, 242
semi-public 27, 29, 113, 131, 238
social see social institutions
instrumentalization, political 50, 62, 74, 83,
136, 199, 292, 296
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej see IPN
344
Index
intelligence services 72, 94-5, 136, 145
interests 23-4, 27, 35-6, 38, 104, 180-1, 230,
232-3
of individuals 35-6, 40, 42, 179
in positions of power 36, 40, 42
personal 36, 38
interpersonal distrust 3, 259
interpersonal trust 3-4, 9-13, 28-9, 39-40,
43-4, 238-41, 256-7, 259-67
generalized 29, 239, 256, 259, 263, 294
higher levels of 176-7, 240, 263
index 258
levels 11, 176-7, 240, 257-8, 263-4
linking file access and disclosures
to 256-65
low 176
perceptions of 34, 260
propensities 29, 259, 264
and survey data 260-4
and transitional justice 257-65
variations in 257
IPN (Instytut Pami^ci Narodowej) 77-9,
199-200, 202-3, 220, 223, 229
journalists 77-8, 82, 136, 200, 246-7; see also
media
judicial frameworks 149, 152, 156, 159, 162,
166-7, 272
judicial independence 150, 152, 154, 160, 162,
166, 168, 274
judiciary 24-7, 112, 147-8, 152-3, 155-6,
159-61, 165-7, 180-2
justice 1-2, 4, 6-8, 17, 38, 40, 275, 282
retroactive 38, 43, 75, 228, 282
retrospective 68, 79, 113
transitional see transitional justice
justice measures 232
additional transitional 89, 95, 104
retributive transitional 290
Kaczyfiski, Lech 78
KDS (Komitet Durzhavna Sigurnost) 92, 95,
136, 141, 219
KGB (Komitet gosudarstvennoy
bezopasnosti) 66-8, 70-2, 85-6, 88-9,
110-11, 113
agents 69, 71, 74, 86, 113
files 67, 111
Komitet Durzhavna Sigurnost see KDS
Komitet gosudarstvennoy bezopasnosti
see KGB
lagged independent variables 153, 283
late lustration programs 20, 136, 161, 170,
199, 204, 270
Latin America 187
Latvia 56, 58-9, 69-74, 76, 85, 118-21, 195,
281-2
citizenship law 72-3
Constitutional Court 46, 69-71, 282
election laws 70-2
leaders 28, 50, 82-3, 98, 113, 136, 247
business 91, 134
communist 96, 144, 270
political 76, 86, 114, 216
legitimacy 44-5, 47, 51-2, 59, 74, 80,
83, 153
perceived 50, 75, 152, 216
levels, lower 163,224,269,271,273-4,286,295
life satisfaction 173, 176, 178-9, 239-41,
249-50, 252-3, 262, 264
limited file access 73, 112, 222
limited lustration 51, 53, 74-92, 114,116,248,
277, 283
laws 93, 108
programs 50-1, 103, 154, 288
linearized standard errors 178, 197, 252, 262
Lithuania 70, 74-5, 85-91, 118-21, 123, 169,
195, 197
additional measures 89-90
law 32,46,217
Lustration Commission 87-9
lustration interrupted 85-9
lustration regulation 133, 188
Parliament 90
Russian population 85
local elections 71, 94, 136, 138, 144
local government 71, 87, 90
loyalty
political 281-2
tests 73
lustration 30-44; see also Introductory Note
absence of 50, 53, 106-14, 116,
148, 153-4
active 83, 85
agencies 142, 221
bills 32, 77, 86, 111-13
bureaucratic change components of
188, 271
catalyzing change 34-40
categories 105-6, 116, 120-3, 242-3, 245,
258, 260, 273
compulsory 75, 121, 133, 142
formal 245
informal 75, 106, 133-4, 153
voluntary 215
certificates 62, 77
choices 120, 122-3, 289
compulsory see compulsory lustration
constitutionality of 62, 77, 87
debates 6-9
definitions 31, 33
Index
345
and distrust 43-4
early 46-7, 80, 161, 170, 182, 210
evolution of term 31-4
formal see formal lustration
and government effectiveness 204-9
informal see informal lustration
late 21, 45, 158, 199, 203-4, 210, 255, 287
laws 51-3, 62-5, 73-7, 82-4, 90-1, 105-6,
108-10,115-18
de facto 73-4
first 80, 118, 123, 133, 156
formal 73, 91, 95, 101, 109, 134
limited 93, 108
liars 66, 72, 77, 79, 87, 202-3
limited see limited lustration
measures 5-11, 115-17, 152-64, 177-82,
191-9, 258-62, 271-4, 276-80, 291-6
variable 116, 119, 149, 153, 156, 182, 277
policies 60, 64-5, 70, 114, 117-18, 149,
152, 198-9
first 117
informal 117, 159
politically instrumentalized 170,204
of private sector positions 87, 89
procedures 63, 67,70, 79, 84,87,200,202-3
processes 20-1, 61-3, 66-7, 77, 82-3,
88-90, 199-200, 202-3
informal 92, 99, 144, 147
programs 11-12,50, 108, 115-17, 120-1,
153-4, 156, 210-11
and public disclosures 7-8, 10-11, 14, 39,
41,44-5, 255-6, 291-3
of public office holders 112, 265
of public officials 264-5
public support for 227-8
punitive 13, 62, 249, 279, 292-4
reforms 116, 204, 287
rejection of 113, 140, 218
self-lustration 88, 90, 98, 101, 103
significance of 160, 162, 164, 166, 171,
192, 209
silent 92-3, 95, 97, 135, 147
of social institutions 245, 248, 266
term 5, 30, 33
and trust 40-3, 153, 156, 158-9, 195, 199,
252, 254
typology 14, 31, 101, 114-15, 120, 122-4,
133, 288
variables 117, 148, 156, 167, 173, 259,
269, 277
waves 118, 153-5, 160-1, 164, 166-8,
170-2, 273, 277
analysis 118, 163
early 161, 167, 193, 198, 292
variable 118-19, 149, 156, 159, 161-2,
182, 191, 193
macro-goals 14, 21
manipulation, political 45, 51-2, 59, 74-5, 91,
108-9, 147, 152-3
mayors 81-2, 94, 104, 133, 138
measures of timing 117-18, 156, 193
Meciar, Vladimir 102-3, 105
media 29, 31-2, 35, 42, 145, 150, 251, 255;
see also press and newspapers
campaigns 88
trust in 246-7
membership 5, 16, 31, 42, 105, 109, 120,
122-3
memory 33, 75, 114, 226, 230
politics 51-2, 105-6
modelling 152-68, 170-2, 177-9, 190-3,
248- 50, 260-4, 271-9, 285-7
models
permutations 162, 167, 193, 250, 273
specifications 124, 154, 159, 191, 250, 255,
273, 286-7
moral cleansing 5, 33, 37, 42, 50-1, 59,
109, 132
motivations 36, 38, 40, 105, 281
national government 4, 86, 188-94, 281
national memory institutes 103, 105
national-level analyses 174-6
NEB see New Europe Barometer
negative effects 11, 14, 17, 180-1, 206, 279,
289-90, 294
negative outcomes 256, 279
negative relationships 157, 159, 239-40,
249- 51, 253, 279-80, 282, 294-5
neighbors 7, 10, 24-5, 106, 131, 227, 238
networks 3, 7, 60, 76, 108, 111, 113, 270
informal 11,43,270,274
social 29-30, 36-7, 40, 42-3, 250, 275
New Democracies Barometer 147-9, 174
New Europe Barometer (NEB) 147, 173, 175,
177, 195, 250, 260-1, 263
newspapers 7, 81, 109, 246
NGOs 112, 114, 143, 146, 242
nomenklatura 30, 37, 68, 93, 96-7, 100, 110
non-Latvians 72-4
non-lustration cases 133, 248, 273, 277, 283
non-politicized public institutions 181,
292, 296
normalization 231, 297
nostalgia 176, 178-9, 194-8, 226, 231, 252-3,
262, 264
growing 228, 231, 233
oaths of conscience 50, 65-6, 68, 70,
82, 133
objects of trust 23-7, 29, 40-1, 43, 47, 53,
251,253
346
Index
Offe, C 8, 16, 24, 34, 44, 131-2, 240-1, 282
office holders 7, 27, 31, 90-1, 134, 138, 227
high-level 32, 101, 113, 227
lustration of public 112, 265
political 91-3, 96, 101, 131
opposition 80, 83, 98, 108, 110, 113,
223, 229
parties 108-9
oppression 216, 225-6
optimism 173-4, 179, 240, 250, 253
Orange Revolution 111-12
ordinal ranking 116, 122, 149
organizations 25, 27-8, 30, 60-1, 71-2, 139,
201, 203
social 29, 247
outcomes 8, 13-15, 18-19, 23, 44, 47, 116,
298-9
negative 256, 279
positive 292, 299
oversight institutions 148, 158-9, 161-3, 167,
175, 180, 189, 255
highest levels of trust in 161
public 159-61, 266, 271, 292
parabola 157, 161, 163, 208, 278, 287
comparative 287
parliament, variation in trust in 169
parliamentary elections 60, 70, 86, 202
particularized political trust 10, 26-7, 30,
41, 180
particularized social trust 25-6, 29-30, 238,
253, 266
particularized trust 24-6, 40, 187
parties, trust in parliament and
political 169-70
part-time informers 92, 218
party affiliations 33, 71, 136, 152
passive complicity 225, 227
perceived legitimacy 50, 75, 152, 216
perceptions
citizen 6, 8, 149-50, 152-3, 178, 181,
196, 198
of corruption 149, 152, 264, 271,
273, 294
of trust 35, 147, 149, 151, 159, 175-6,
188-9, 198-9
personal betrayals 10, 21, 39, 256
personal files 98, 133, 142, 230, 264
personal information 223, 230
personal privacy 84, 221-2
Poland 74-80, 120-3, 199, 202-6, 220-1,
227-8, 244-7, 270-1
change of lustration authority 199-201
Constitutional Court 46, 62, 78, 200
file reviews and bureaucratic change 201-3
late lustration 199-204
light lustration 76-8
Lustration Court 77, 199, 202
public support for lustration 228-9
renewed lustration 78-9
SB (Służba Bezpieczeństwa) 76-7, 201
police 26-7, 147-8, 155-6, 159-61, 165,
167-9, 180-2, 196-7
political 31,98, 133-4, 142, 144
secret see secret police
policymakers 4, 6,43,45-6, 117, 292, 294, 297
political crimes 68, 110
political elites 123, 225, 270
political institutions 9-10, 13-14, 24-7, 40-3,
132, 181-2, 239, 280
higher levels of trust in 265, 274
political instrumentalization 50, 62, 74, 83,
136, 199, 292, 296
political leaders 76, 86, 114, 216
political loyalty 281-2
political manipulation 45, 51-2, 59, 74-5, 91,
108-9, 147, 152-3
political office 36, 71-2
holders 91-3, 96, 101, 131
political opposition 152-3, 155, 158, 160, 162,
171-2, 254-5, 285-6
strength of 155, 160, 164, 192, 207,254, 285
political parties 82-3, 91, 146-9, 152-3,
162-5, 169-70, 174-5, 180-1
political police 31, 98, 133-4, 142, 144
political positions 11, 40, 139, 256, 270
political prisoners 64, 98, 105
political trust 10-12, 24-6, 40-1, 173, 176-7,
179-81, 250-1, 255-6
building 153, 170, 181, 193, 289, 298
highest levels of 13
objects 40, 42, 165, 265
particularized 10, 26-7, 30, 41, 180
propensities 173, 197, 227, 263
relationships 25, 176, 297
politically instnimentalized lustration
170, 204
politicization 85, 142, 153, 158, 228-30, 232,
292, 296
politicized institutions 13, 20, 148, 159,
162-3, 170, 180-1, 295-6
Polity IV 150-1, 159-60, 164, 166, 249-50,
272, 276-7, 283-4
measures 250, 277, 289
model replications 150, 156, 159-60, 162,
164, 166, 171, 207
scores 249, 272, 276
positions 4-5, 44-7, 50-2, 59-63, 77-9, 81-4,
101-4, 203
categories of 59, 81-2, 200, 242
civil service 65
economic 99, 242
Index
347
government 86, 133
political 11, 40, 139, 256, 270
private sector 32, 87
of public trust 32, 35, 242
positive effects 9, 13, 49, 52, 181, 183, 209-10,
230, 292, 299
positive relationships 179-81, 206, 250, 253,
255, 266-7, 274, 279
power 2-3, 36, 44-5, 62-3, 88-9, 102-4, 113,
140-3
abuses of 2, 269, 280
economic 270-1
political 139, 270
social 101, 246
structures 99
predicted value calculations 154, 159, 161,
167, 249, 277
presidential administration 94,137-8
presidential vetoes 61, 73
presidents 27-8, 73, 75, 78-9, 87-8, 133-4,
137, 146-7
press 29, 86, 104, 147-8, 159, 161, 254-5,
266-7; see also media
previous collaboration 5, 51-2, 67, 70, 99
privacy 8, 215, 221-2, 224
personal 84, 221-2
safeguards 140, 221-4
private sector positions 32, 87
lustration of 87, 89
propensities for trust see trust, propensities
property restitution 64, 68, 84, 89,
100,114
prosecutors 59-60, 76, 82, 87, 104
public accountability 133, 146, 271
public disclosure 5-14, 37-41, 43-5, 50-3,
90-2, 99-102, 145-7, 242-8
laws 34, 56, 242
and lustration 7-8, 10-11, 39, 41, 44-5,
134-47, 255-6, 291-3
measures 11, 30-44, 101, 269-71, 275, 280,
288-9, 291
policies 47, 95, 101, 265
processes 20, 30, 36, 38, 92, 134
programs 95, 115, 135, 182, 225, 255, 264
and trust 40-3
public institutions 2-4, 10-12, 41-2, 187-90,
195-6, 198-9, 262-3, 291-4
building trust in 131-83
composites 153-9, 163
effects of lustration on trust in 134, 154
elected 148, 162
higher levels of trust in 154, 177, 179, 263
individual attitudes toward 173-80
non-politicized 181, 292, 296
politicized 13, 148, 162, 170
trustworthy 44, 131, 158, 241
public office 27, 31, 68, 97-9, 138, 140,
143, 146
holders 40, 94, 133, 136, 138, 140, 256, 265
seekers 77, 199
public officials 31-2, 77, 81-3, 86, 89, 96,
136, 202
lustration 264-5
public opinion 21, 104, 204
polls 104, 228, 230-3
public oversight institutions 159-62, 266,
271, 292
public positions 77, 81, 94, 98, 133, 136-7,
141, 202-3
public revelations see revelations
public support for lustration 227-33
public pressure 105
public trust 32, 34, 36, 38, 51, 78-9,
113-14, 170
positions of 32, 35, 242
punitive lustration 13, 62, 249, 279, 292-4
purges 16, 33-4, 108-10, 112, 135, 298
quality of governance 151, 204, 206
of reforms 47, 50, 182, 199
quasi-social institutions 131, 242, 255
random effects 153, 191-2
rate of collaboration 138
rational distrust 189, 248
reasons for collaboration 216
reconciliation 1-2, 4, 8, 19, 49, 275, 295
societal 5, 17, 34, 232, 292, 295, 298
recursive relationships 30,211
reform 12-15, 44-7, 115-18, 157-8, 181-2,
208-10, 289, 295-6
anti-corruption 270
early 46-7, 195, 287, 291-2, 296, 299
efficacy 4, 13, 20, 269, 278, 287, 291, 295
goals 12-13,211,289
implementation 117-18,215
institutional 11, 116, 211, 288, 292
late 45-6, 182, 199, 209-10, 295, 299
process 114,118,227
quality 47, 50, 182, 199
timing 44-7, 117-18, 157-8, 165, 182,
208-9, 286-7, 291-2, 295
transitional justice 4, 9, 20, 198, 204
regime complicity 12, 14, 74, 76, 214-15, 224,
244-5, 255-6
regime goals 2, 9, 107
regime transitions 38,56,59,122, 163,179,299
regional lustration programs 92, 136
regression coefficients
standardized 178, 197, 252, 262
unstandardized 156, 160, 164, 166, 168,
171-2, 272, 276
348
Index
rejection of lustration 113, 140, 218
relationships
negative 157, 159, 239-40, 249-51, 253,
279-80, 282, 294-5
positive 179-81, 206, 250, 253, 255, 266-7,
274, 279
recursive 30, 211
religious institutions 243, 248; see also church
replications 209
Polity IV model 150, 156, 159-60, 162,164,
166, 171, 207
repression 3, 60, 64, 66, 68-9, 73, 100, 114
repressive apparatus 5, 32, 99
reputations 7, 27, 83, 131, 133, 146, 247
requests for verification 143-4, 146
research design 8-9, 14-16, 124
resignation 38, 66, 74-5, 81-4, 103-4, 147,
245-6
restitution, property 64, 68, 84, 89, 100, 114
retroactive justice 38, 43, 75, 228, 282
retrospective justice 68, 79, 113
revelations 6-7, 39, 139, 227, 229-30, 232-3,
244-7, 255-6; see also public
disclosure
file 2, 43, 219, 221, 227, 232, 256, 265
robust civil societies 4, 275, 279-80, 288, 294
Romania 97-103, 118-21, 133-5, 14!-7,
217-19, 230-1, 244-5, 270
bureaucratic and symbolic changes 145-6
CN.S.A.S. 99-101, 106, 133, 141-6,219,
223, 231, 242
Constitutional Court 99-100, 143-4
parliament 98, 101, 143, 270
public disclosures as informal
lustration 99-100
public support for lustration 230-2
scope of disclosures 143-5
Securitate 3, 97-8, 100-1, 133-4, 142, 219,
230-1, 270
thwarted lustration 97-9
Tismăneanu Commission 100, 142
Romanians 98, 100, 231
rule of law 1-3, 7-8, 45-6, 147-8, 150, 221,
280, 282
Russia 106-7, 111, 113-14, 173-5, 195,
205-6, 257, 283-4
Yeltsin, Boris 67, 113-14
Russians 68-9, 73-4, 85, 111, 113, 231
sabotage 8, 44-5
safeguards, privacy 140, 221-4
sample sizes 197, 251, 257, 260-1, 273, 283
satisfaction, life 173, 176, 178-9, 239-41,
249-50, 252-3, 262, 264
SB (Służba Bezpieczeństwa) 76-7, 201
SBU (Sluzhba Bezpeky Ukrayiny) 110-11
scope of lustration 32, 203
screening 31-3, 60, 75, 77-9, 95-6, 132-4,
144-7, 242-3
employment 30, 32, 51, 59, 139, 142
law 61, 77, 81, 281
procedures 31-2, 199
Screening Committees 83, 85, 221
secret collaboration 86, 217
secret files 2, 73, 85
secret police 3, 7, 80, 108-9, 188-9, 214-16,
218-19, 246-7
activities 69-70, 97, 226
affiliation 32-3
agents 60, 95, 216, 226, 270
collaboration with 33, 39, 80-1, 139,
216-21, 223, 225, 227
files 5, 7-8, 28, 91-2, 134-5, 199-200,
215-17, 220-1
networks 76, 80, 85, 108, 111, 218, 226, 232
secret services 74, 86, 108, 222, 229
agents 85, 141, 146
Secret-Police Files 94, 105
Securitate 3, 97-8, 100-1, 133-4, 142, 219,
230-1, 270
agents 97, 270
archives/files 98, 141-6
security services 60-1, 66-7, 78, 80-1, 92,
201-2, 217-20, 270
self lustration 88, 90, 98, 101, 103
semi-public institutions 27, 29, 113, 131, 238
semi-public office holders 79, 114
semi-public positions 32-3, 59, 61, 96, 98,
100, 140, 142-5
semi-public sectors 81, 101, 143, 146
shaming 13, 32, 67, 75, 92, 141, 147, 203
significant predictors of trust 154, 167, 170,
180, 182, 191, 198, 253
silence 98, 214-15
silent lustration 92-3, 95, 97, 135, 147
siloviki 113
Slovakia 58, 61, 101-6, 110, 118, 120-3, 257,
259-60
aborted lustration 102-4
additional transitional justice
measures 104-5
Mečiar, Vladimír 102-3, 105
ÜPN (Ústav pamäti národa) 103-4, 106
Służba Bezpieczeństwa see SB
Sluzhba Bezpeky Ukrayiny (SBU) 110-11
social capital 4, 29-30, 238-9, 279
social distrust 3, 266, 294
social institutions 9-14, 29-30, 42-3, 238-9,
242-4, 246-51, 255-6, 265-7
and collaboration 242-8
important 244, 246, 248
interpersonal trust and trust in 25, 297
Index
349
lower levels of trust in 249, 263
lustration of 245, 248, 266
targeted 21, 227, 239, 243, 248, 280, 294
social networks 29-30, 36-7, 40, 42-3,
250, 275
social organizations 29, 247
social positions 31, 51, 91, 134, 266
social power 101, 246
social trust 9-10, 20-1, 25-6, 176-8, 238-43,
250-1, 255-6, 262-7
building 2, 4, 20, 50, 115, 240-1, 250,
265, 267
objects 20, 39-40, 294
particularized 25-6, 29-30, 238, 253, 266
relationships 9, 241
social trust variables 177
societal complicity 13, 29, 227
societal reconciliation 5, 17, 34, 232, 292,
295, 298
societal trust 4, 27, 30, 39, 49, 291
Soviet Union 72, 85, 107, 113, 122, 196;
see also Russia
stability 1, 158, 231, 240
democratic 4, 9, 188, 239
standard errors 156, 160, 164, 166, 168,
171-2, 272, 276
linearized 178, 197, 252, 262
standardized regression coefficients 178, 197,
252, 262
state-building 1, 5, 17, 45, 62, 69, 73, 232
state company executives 78, 200
strength
of civil society 11, 13, 49, 53, 249-50,
254-5, 276-80, 288
of political opposition 155, 160, 164, 192,
207, 254, 285
survey data 175, 178-9, 195
and interpersonal trust 260-4
symbolic accountability 10, 50, 85, 95, 114
symbolic change 9-11, 34, 50, 52-3, 115, 140,
145, 288
targeted social institutions 21, 227, 239, 243,
248, 280, 294
temporal constraints 9, 46, 199
timing 117, 156-8, 161, 163, 193, 198-9,
208-9, 260-1
effects of 13, 154, 161, 191, 209
of lustration 155-6, 160-1, 163-4, 170-2,
207- 8, 254-5, 272-3, 285-6
variables 156, 167, 208, 259, 277
measures 117-18, 156, 193
of reforms 44-7, 117-18, 157-8, 165, 182,
208- 9, 286-7, 291-2, 295
variables 148-9, 161, 167, 248, 251, 255,
273, 277
trade unions see unions
transition 12-15, 45-7, 91-3, 120-2, 157,
208-10, 287, 289
authoritarian 1-2, 49
goals 3-4, 9-11, 13-14, 18, 48-9, 291, 293,
295-6
transitional justice 1-2, 101-3, 210-11, 230,
232, 265-6, 280, 293-9
choices 5-6, 17, 105, 107, 119, 122
and interpersonal trust 257-65
linking to trust building and
democratization 10-16
literature 4, 7, 12, 20, 279, 287-8, 291,
293-5
measurement 115 -24
measures 1-2, 11-12, 26-7, 48-50, 111-12,
251, 289, 297-9
and interpersonal trust 260-1
mechanisms 1, 11, 16, 18, 45, 110, 183
post-communist 5-9
programs 9, 12, 16, 19, 21,216-17, 297, 299
reforms 4, 9, 20, 198, 204
in support of democratization 269-90
testing for relationship with trust 147-72
and trust 23-54
and trust in elected institutions 164
and trust in government 190, 192, 196-7
and trust in political parties 172
and trust in social institutions 248-55
typology 20, 50-4, 56, 59, 61, 63,
115-17, 119
country classification 56-124
transparency 39-41, 63, 65, 95, 98-9, 145,
147, 202
file 63-4, 189, 221
file access 260
trials 2, 17-18, 49, 68, 96, 100, 109-10, 298
trust
assessments 20, 24, 26-7, 35, 37, 187,
189, 267
in church 244-6, 250-3
citizen 28, 36, 44, 196
cleavages 24-6, 53
definitions and mechanisms 23-30
effects 10-11, 36, 41, 47, 157, 181,
244, 251
effects of lustration on 40-1, 134, 189, 210,
266, 294
in elected institutions 162-5
generalized see generalized trust
in government and government
effectiveness 187-211
higher levels of 176, 182, 255
index 257-8
interpersonal see interpersonal trust
in judiciary and police 165-9
350
Index
trust (cont.)
literature 12, 20, 23, 26, 52-3, 176, 241,
263-4
and lustration 153, 156, 158-9, 195, 199,
252, 254, 259
matrix 26, 53
in media 246-7, 254-5
in national government 4, 191-3
objects of 23-7,29, 40-1,43,47,53,251,253
in oversight institutions 159-63, 295
in parliament and political parties 169-72
particularized 24-6, 40, 187
perceptions of 35, 147, 149, 151, 159,
175-6, 188-9, 198-9
in political institutions 10, 13, 26, 41, 49,
53, 182, 239
in political parties 153, 162, 169-70, 172,
174, 263
propensities 24-6, 28-9, 173, 176, 194,
197-8, 238-9, 263-4
in public institutions 27, 131-83
significant predictors of 154, 167, 170, 180,
182, 191, 198, 253
social see social trust
in social institutions 9, 11-14, 25-6, 29-30,
42-3, 238-9, 263, 265-7
and transitional justice 248-55
societal 4, 27, 30, 39, 49, 291
and transitional justice 23-54, 147-72
transitional justice and interpersonal 257,
260-3
in unions 247-8, 265
variation in 148, 169, 176, 180
see also Introductory Note
trust-building 3-4, 6-7, 10-14, 19-21, 52-3,
115-17, 156-8, 181-2
effects 11, 20, 47, 109, 154, 157, 161, 167
goals 8, 20
trust relationships
political 25, 176, 297
social 9, 241
vertical 238
trust variables 175, 251
social 177
trustor/trustee relationships 24-6, 238
trustworthiness 2, 23-5, 27-8, 35-40, 131-2,
152-3, 175-6, 187-9
changing perceptions of 34-40
perceptions of 28, 50, 180, 182
trustworthy government 28, 187-8, 293
trustworthy public institutions 44, 131-4,
158, 241
truth 1-2, 47-8, 76-7, 79-80, 95, 100, 132-3,
294-5
truth commissions 8-13, 47-9, 118-19,
162-4, 170-2, 249-52, 271-3, 279,
285-6
effects 183, 295
presence/absence 119, 149
variable 119, 148-9
truth-telling 31, 33, 37-9, 42-3, 48-51, 80,
290, 294-5
explicit truth-telling component
48, 275
turnover, bureaucratic 41, 63, 84, 94, 132,
203-4
typologies 12, 20, 51-4, 59, 114-16, 122,
273, 277
Ukraine 106-7, 110-14, 120, 148, 150-1,
173-5, 205-6, 248-9
file access 112-13
lustration rejected 111-12
Orange Revolution 111-12
unions 21, 26, 29-30, 177-8, 243-4, 247-9,
251, 262-3
trust in 247-8, 265
United Nations 2, 6
unstandardized regression coefficients 156,
160, 164, 166, 168, 171-2, 272, 276
ÜPN (Üstav pamàti nàroda) 103-4, 106
veracity, files 95, 99, 142, 221
verification 86, 136-7, 146, 220, 242
requests 143-4, 146
vetting 6-7, 31-3, 104, 107, 243-4, 246, 248,
297-8
employment 5-6, 10, 33, 93, 100, 141, 148,
292-3
processes 6, 140, 270
voluntary employment
change 52, 243
resignations 74-5, 147
Wildstein’s List 78, 135
WVS (World Values Survey) 26,28,257-9,261
Yeltsin, Boris 67, 113-14
Bayerische
Staatsbibliothek
München
7
Table of Contents
List of Figures xi
List of Tables xiii
List of Abbreviations xv
Interviews Cited in Book xvii
Introduction 1
1. Trust and Transitional Justice 23
2. Classifying Countries within the Transitional
Justice Typology 56
3. Building Trust in Public Institutions 131
4. Trust in Government and Government Effectiveness 187
5. Collaboration, Complicity, and Historical Memory 214
6. Lustration, Public Disclosures, and Social Trust 238
7. Transitional Justice in Support of Democratization 269
8. Conclusion: Evaluating Post-Communist Transitional Justice 291
Appendix L Lustration, Public Disclosure, and File Access
Laws and Policies 301
Appendix 2. Timeline of Regional Transitional Justice and
Lustration Programs (1990--2012) 306
Appendix 3. Data Sources and Transformations 310
Appendix 4. Replications 313
B ibliography 317
Index 339 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Horne, Cynthia M. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1136049258 |
| author_facet | Horne, Cynthia M. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Horne, Cynthia M. |
| author_variant | c m h cm cmh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044327473 |
| classification_rvk | ME 3370 MG 80097 NQ 8306 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)992533066 (DE-599)BVBBV044327473 |
| discipline | Politologie Geschichte |
| edition | First edition |
| era | Geschichte 1989-2012 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1989-2012 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044327473</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20181107</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170526s2017 xx |||| |||| 10||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780198793328</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-879332-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)992533066</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044327473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ME 3370</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122599:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MG 80097</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122863:12056</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NQ 8306</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)128986:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Horne, Cynthia M.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1136049258</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Building trust and democracy</subfield><subfield code="b">transitional justice in post-communist countries</subfield><subfield code="c">Cynthia M. Horne</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xviii, 350 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oxford studies in democratization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1989-2012</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Demokratisierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124941-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Transitional Justice</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1069126748</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vertrauen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063290-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Osteuropa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4075739-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Democracy / Europe, Eastern / Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Democracy / Europe, Central / Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Trust / Europe, Eastern / Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Trust / Europe, Central / Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Transitional justice / Europe, Eastern / Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Transitional justice / Europe, Central / Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Osteuropa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4075739-0</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Transitional Justice</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1069126748</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Demokratisierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124941-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Vertrauen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063290-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1989-2012</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Gemischte Register</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09049</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09049</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09049</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029730813</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Konferenzschrift |
| geographic | Osteuropa (DE-588)4075739-0 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Osteuropa |
| id | DE-604.BV044327473 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-14T15:00:26Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780198793328 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029730813 |
| oclc_num | 992533066 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-188 DE-703 DE-739 DE-824 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-188 DE-703 DE-739 DE-824 |
| physical | xviii, 350 Seiten Diagramme |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Oxford studies in democratization |
| spelling | Horne, Cynthia M. Verfasser (DE-588)1136049258 aut Building trust and democracy transitional justice in post-communist countries Cynthia M. Horne First edition Oxford Oxford University Press 2017 xviii, 350 Seiten Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Oxford studies in democratization Geschichte 1989-2012 gnd rswk-swf Demokratisierung (DE-588)4124941-0 gnd rswk-swf Transitional Justice (DE-588)1069126748 gnd rswk-swf Vertrauen (DE-588)4063290-8 gnd rswk-swf Osteuropa (DE-588)4075739-0 gnd rswk-swf Democracy / Europe, Eastern / Congresses Democracy / Europe, Central / Congresses Trust / Europe, Eastern / Congresses Trust / Europe, Central / Congresses Transitional justice / Europe, Eastern / Congresses Transitional justice / Europe, Central / Congresses (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift gnd-content Osteuropa (DE-588)4075739-0 g Transitional Justice (DE-588)1069126748 s Demokratisierung (DE-588)4124941-0 s Vertrauen (DE-588)4063290-8 s Geschichte 1989-2012 z DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Register // Gemischte Register Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Horne, Cynthia M. Building trust and democracy transitional justice in post-communist countries Demokratisierung (DE-588)4124941-0 gnd Transitional Justice (DE-588)1069126748 gnd Vertrauen (DE-588)4063290-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4124941-0 (DE-588)1069126748 (DE-588)4063290-8 (DE-588)4075739-0 (DE-588)1071861417 |
| title | Building trust and democracy transitional justice in post-communist countries |
| title_auth | Building trust and democracy transitional justice in post-communist countries |
| title_exact_search | Building trust and democracy transitional justice in post-communist countries |
| title_full | Building trust and democracy transitional justice in post-communist countries Cynthia M. Horne |
| title_fullStr | Building trust and democracy transitional justice in post-communist countries Cynthia M. Horne |
| title_full_unstemmed | Building trust and democracy transitional justice in post-communist countries Cynthia M. Horne |
| title_short | Building trust and democracy |
| title_sort | building trust and democracy transitional justice in post communist countries |
| title_sub | transitional justice in post-communist countries |
| topic | Demokratisierung (DE-588)4124941-0 gnd Transitional Justice (DE-588)1069126748 gnd Vertrauen (DE-588)4063290-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Demokratisierung Transitional Justice Vertrauen Osteuropa Konferenzschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029730813&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hornecynthiam buildingtrustanddemocracytransitionaljusticeinpostcommunistcountries |