International perspectives on forensic risk assessment: measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Konstanz
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Item Description: | Erscheint auch als Online Ausgabe: Singh, Jay P.: International Perspectives on Forensic Risk Assessment |
| Physical Description: | X, 211 Blätter Karte |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043951114 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 161208s2016 |||| m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967908656 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ455763658 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-473 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Singh, Jay P. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1115210319 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a International perspectives on forensic risk assessment |b measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality |c vorgelegt von Jay P. Singh |
| 264 | 1 | |a Konstanz |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a X, 211 Blätter |b Karte | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Erscheint auch als Online Ausgabe: Singh, Jay P.: International Perspectives on Forensic Risk Assessment | ||
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c Universität Konstanz |d 2016 | ||
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 751 | |a Konstanz |4 uvp | ||
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029359972&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029359972 | ||
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804176901305008128 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENT
SUMMARY..................................................................................VIII
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG............................................................................IX
INTRODUCTION................................................................................1
1.1 Identifying Risk and Protective Factors................................ ..........1
1.2 Contemporary Approaches to Forensic Risk Assessment..................................3
1.2.1 Unstructured Clinical Judgment.............................................. 3
1.2.2 Actuarial Assessment............................................................ 5
1.2.3 Structured Professional Judgment.................................................12
1.3 Integrating Risk Assessment Research Into Practice................................ 19
1.4 The Present Thesis................................................................ 20
2 RESEARCH ARTICLES................................................................... 25
2.1 Hurducas, C., Singh, J. P., de Ruiter, C., Petrila, J. (2014). Violence risk assessment tools: A
systematic review of clinical surveys. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13, 181-192.25
2.1.1 Abstract.........................................................................25
2.1.2 Introduction.....................................................................26
2.1.3 Method......................................................................... 28
2.1.4 Results........................................................................ 32
2.1.5 Discussion.......................................................................42
2.2 Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., Hurducas, C., Arbach-Lucioni, K., Condemarin, C., de Ruiter, C.,
Dean, K., Doyle, M., Folino, J., Godoy, V., Grann, M., Ho, R., Large, M., Nielsen, L. H., Pham, T.,
Rebocho, R. M., Reeves, K., Rettenberger, M., Otto, R. K. (2014). Use and perceived utility of
structured violence risk assessment tools in 44 countries: Findings from the IRiS Project. International
Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13, 193-206....................................... 46
2.2.1 Abstract....................................................................... 46
2.2.2 Introduction.....................................................................47
2.2.3 Methods.................................................................... 49
2.2.4 Results...................................................................... 54
2.2.5 Discussion..................................................................... 60
2.2.6 Funding...................................................................... 64
2.2.8 Appendix.........................................................................65
2.3 Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S., Van Dorn, R. A. (2013). Measurement of predictive validity in
violence risk assessment studies: A second-order systematic review.
Behavioral Sciences the Law, 31, 55-73.......................................... 68
2.3.1 Abstract....................................................................... 68
2.3.2 Introduction................................................................. 68
2.3.3 Methods....................................................................... 73
2.3.4 Results......................................................................... 77
2.3.5 Discussion..................................................................... 84
2.3.6 Conclusion................................................:...............................87
II
Inhaltsverzeichnis
2.3.7 Acknowledgements................................................................ 88
2.3.8 Appendix................................................................. 88
2.4 Singh, J. P., Yang, S., Mulvey, E., the RAGEE Group (2014). Reporting standards for risk
assessment predictive validity studies: The Risk Assessment Guidelines for the Evaluation of Efficacy
(RAGEE) Statement. Law Human Behavior, 59,15-22 .......................... ..............93
2.4.1 Abstract........................................................................ 93
2.4.2 Introduction................................................................... 93
2.4.3 Method........................................................................ 95
.................................................................................... 99
2.4.4 Results....................................................................... 99
2.4.5 Discussion..................................................................... 102
2.4.6 Conclusion................................................................... 104
2.5 Gmiir, C., Singh, J. P. (2014). Reporting quality of the sex offender risk assessment literature:
A systematic review. Sexual Offender Treatment, 9, 1-14................................... 105
2.5.1 Abstract.........................................................................105
2.5.2 Introduction............................................................... ..105
2.5.3 Method......................................................................... 107
2.5.4 Results...................................................................... ..109
2.5.5 Discussion................................................................. 110
2.5.6 Conflict of Interest and Funding.................................................113
................................................................................... 115
2.5.7 Supplement............................................................. 117
RECORD OF ACHIEVEMENT.......................................................................119
REFERENCES................................................................................ 121
RAGEE SUPPLEMENT
161
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Singh, Jay P. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1115210319 |
| author_facet | Singh, Jay P. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Singh, Jay P. |
| author_variant | j p s jp jps |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043951114 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)967908656 (DE-599)BSZ455763658 |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01301nam a2200301 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043951114</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161208s2016 |||| m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967908656</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ455763658</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Jay P.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1115210319</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International perspectives on forensic risk assessment</subfield><subfield code="b">measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality</subfield><subfield code="c">vorgelegt von Jay P. Singh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Konstanz</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">X, 211 Blätter</subfield><subfield code="b">Karte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Erscheint auch als Online Ausgabe: Singh, Jay P.: International Perspectives on Forensic Risk Assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">Universität Konstanz</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="751" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Konstanz</subfield><subfield code="4">uvp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029359972&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029359972</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV043951114 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:39:32Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029359972 |
| oclc_num | 967908656 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | X, 211 Blätter Karte |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Singh, Jay P. Verfasser (DE-588)1115210319 aut International perspectives on forensic risk assessment measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality vorgelegt von Jay P. Singh Konstanz 2016 X, 211 Blätter Karte txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Erscheint auch als Online Ausgabe: Singh, Jay P.: International Perspectives on Forensic Risk Assessment Dissertation Universität Konstanz 2016 (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Konstanz uvp Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029359972&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Singh, Jay P. International perspectives on forensic risk assessment measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | International perspectives on forensic risk assessment measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality |
| title_auth | International perspectives on forensic risk assessment measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality |
| title_exact_search | International perspectives on forensic risk assessment measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality |
| title_full | International perspectives on forensic risk assessment measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality vorgelegt von Jay P. Singh |
| title_fullStr | International perspectives on forensic risk assessment measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality vorgelegt von Jay P. Singh |
| title_full_unstemmed | International perspectives on forensic risk assessment measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality vorgelegt von Jay P. Singh |
| title_short | International perspectives on forensic risk assessment |
| title_sort | international perspectives on forensic risk assessment measuring use perceived utility and research quality |
| title_sub | measuring use, perceived utility, and research quality |
| topic_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029359972&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT singhjayp internationalperspectivesonforensicriskassessmentmeasuringuseperceivedutilityandresearchquality |