The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement: a comparative study
This book examines the application of treaties by domestic courts in twelve countries. The central question is whether domestic courts actually provide remedies to private parties who are harmed by a violation of their treaty-based rights. The analysis shows that domestic courts in eight of the twel...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2009
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 UBT01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This book examines the application of treaties by domestic courts in twelve countries. The central question is whether domestic courts actually provide remedies to private parties who are harmed by a violation of their treaty-based rights. The analysis shows that domestic courts in eight of the twelve countries - Australia, Canada, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom - generally do enforce treaty-based rights on behalf of private parties. On the other hand, the evidence is mixed for the other four countries: China, Israel, Russia, and the United States. In China, Israel, and Russia, the trends are moving in the direction of greater judicial enforcement of treaties on behalf of private parties. The United States is the only country surveyed where the trend is moving in the opposite direction. US courts' reluctance to enforce treaty-based rights undermines efforts to develop a more cooperative global order |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xxix, 626 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9780511635458 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511635458 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043926507 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180612 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161202s2009 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511635458 |c Online |9 978-0-511-63545-8 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511635458 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511635458 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)838257030 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043926507 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-703 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.3/7 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PR 2213 |0 (DE-625)139532: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement |b a comparative study |c edited by David Sloss |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xxix, 626 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
| 505 | 8 | 0 | |t Treaty enforcement in domestic courts : a comparative analysis |r David Sloss |t Does international law obligate states to open their national courts to persons for the invocation of treaty norms that protect or benefit persons? |r Sean D. Murphy |t Australia |r Donald R. Rothwell |t Canada |r Gib van Ert |t Germany |r Andreas L. Paulus |t India |r Nihal Jayawickrama |t Israel |r David Kretzmer |t The Netherlands |r André Nollkaemper |t Poland |r Lech Garlicki, Małgorzata Masternak-Kubiak, and Krzysztof Wójtowicz |t Russian Federation |r William E. Butler |t South Africa |r John Dugard |t United Kingdom |r Anthony Aust |t United States |r David Sloss |t The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : summary and conclusions |r Michael P. Van Alstine |
| 520 | |a This book examines the application of treaties by domestic courts in twelve countries. The central question is whether domestic courts actually provide remedies to private parties who are harmed by a violation of their treaty-based rights. The analysis shows that domestic courts in eight of the twelve countries - Australia, Canada, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom - generally do enforce treaty-based rights on behalf of private parties. On the other hand, the evidence is mixed for the other four countries: China, Israel, Russia, and the United States. In China, Israel, and Russia, the trends are moving in the direction of greater judicial enforcement of treaties on behalf of private parties. The United States is the only country surveyed where the trend is moving in the opposite direction. US courts' reluctance to enforce treaty-based rights undermines efforts to develop a more cooperative global order | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Treaties | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International and municipal law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jurisdiction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jurisdiction (International law) | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sloss, David |d 1957- |0 (DE-588)1013329392 |4 edt | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-87730-5 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-1-107-63374-2 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029335586 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458 |l UBT01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBT_PDA_CBO_Kauf |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804176854110699520 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Sloss, David 1957- |
| author2_role | edt |
| author2_variant | d s ds |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1013329392 |
| author_additional | David Sloss Sean D. Murphy Donald R. Rothwell Gib van Ert Andreas L. Paulus Nihal Jayawickrama David Kretzmer André Nollkaemper Lech Garlicki, Małgorzata Masternak-Kubiak, and Krzysztof Wójtowicz William E. Butler John Dugard Anthony Aust Michael P. Van Alstine |
| author_facet | Sloss, David 1957- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043926507 |
| classification_rvk | PR 2213 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| contents | Treaty enforcement in domestic courts : a comparative analysis Does international law obligate states to open their national courts to persons for the invocation of treaty norms that protect or benefit persons? Australia Canada Germany India Israel The Netherlands Poland Russian Federation South Africa United Kingdom United States The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : summary and conclusions |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511635458 (OCoLC)838257030 (DE-599)BVBBV043926507 |
| dewey-full | 341.3/7 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.3/7 |
| dewey-search | 341.3/7 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.3 17 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511635458 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03528nmm a2200469zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043926507</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180612 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2009 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511635458</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-63545-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511635458</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511635458</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)838257030</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043926507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.3/7</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2213</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139532:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement</subfield><subfield code="b">a comparative study</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by David Sloss</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xxix, 626 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Treaty enforcement in domestic courts : a comparative analysis</subfield><subfield code="r">David Sloss</subfield><subfield code="t">Does international law obligate states to open their national courts to persons for the invocation of treaty norms that protect or benefit persons?</subfield><subfield code="r">Sean D. Murphy</subfield><subfield code="t">Australia</subfield><subfield code="r">Donald R. Rothwell</subfield><subfield code="t">Canada</subfield><subfield code="r">Gib van Ert</subfield><subfield code="t">Germany</subfield><subfield code="r">Andreas L. Paulus</subfield><subfield code="t">India</subfield><subfield code="r">Nihal Jayawickrama</subfield><subfield code="t">Israel</subfield><subfield code="r">David Kretzmer</subfield><subfield code="t">The Netherlands</subfield><subfield code="r">André Nollkaemper</subfield><subfield code="t">Poland</subfield><subfield code="r">Lech Garlicki, Małgorzata Masternak-Kubiak, and Krzysztof Wójtowicz</subfield><subfield code="t">Russian Federation</subfield><subfield code="r">William E. Butler</subfield><subfield code="t">South Africa</subfield><subfield code="r">John Dugard</subfield><subfield code="t">United Kingdom</subfield><subfield code="r">Anthony Aust</subfield><subfield code="t">United States</subfield><subfield code="r">David Sloss</subfield><subfield code="t">The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : summary and conclusions</subfield><subfield code="r">Michael P. Van Alstine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book examines the application of treaties by domestic courts in twelve countries. The central question is whether domestic courts actually provide remedies to private parties who are harmed by a violation of their treaty-based rights. The analysis shows that domestic courts in eight of the twelve countries - Australia, Canada, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom - generally do enforce treaty-based rights on behalf of private parties. On the other hand, the evidence is mixed for the other four countries: China, Israel, Russia, and the United States. In China, Israel, and Russia, the trends are moving in the direction of greater judicial enforcement of treaties on behalf of private parties. The United States is the only country surveyed where the trend is moving in the opposite direction. US courts' reluctance to enforce treaty-based rights undermines efforts to develop a more cooperative global order</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treaties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International and municipal law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction (International law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sloss, David</subfield><subfield code="d">1957-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1013329392</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-87730-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-63374-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029335586</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458</subfield><subfield code="l">UBT01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBT_PDA_CBO_Kauf</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043926507 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:47Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780511635458 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029335586 |
| oclc_num | 838257030 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-703 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-703 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 online resource (xxix, 626 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBT_PDA_CBO_Kauf |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement a comparative study edited by David Sloss Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2009 1 online resource (xxix, 626 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) Treaty enforcement in domestic courts : a comparative analysis David Sloss Does international law obligate states to open their national courts to persons for the invocation of treaty norms that protect or benefit persons? Sean D. Murphy Australia Donald R. Rothwell Canada Gib van Ert Germany Andreas L. Paulus India Nihal Jayawickrama Israel David Kretzmer The Netherlands André Nollkaemper Poland Lech Garlicki, Małgorzata Masternak-Kubiak, and Krzysztof Wójtowicz Russian Federation William E. Butler South Africa John Dugard United Kingdom Anthony Aust United States David Sloss The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : summary and conclusions Michael P. Van Alstine This book examines the application of treaties by domestic courts in twelve countries. The central question is whether domestic courts actually provide remedies to private parties who are harmed by a violation of their treaty-based rights. The analysis shows that domestic courts in eight of the twelve countries - Australia, Canada, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom - generally do enforce treaty-based rights on behalf of private parties. On the other hand, the evidence is mixed for the other four countries: China, Israel, Russia, and the United States. In China, Israel, and Russia, the trends are moving in the direction of greater judicial enforcement of treaties on behalf of private parties. The United States is the only country surveyed where the trend is moving in the opposite direction. US courts' reluctance to enforce treaty-based rights undermines efforts to develop a more cooperative global order Treaties International and municipal law Jurisdiction Jurisdiction (International law) Sloss, David 1957- (DE-588)1013329392 edt Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-87730-5 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-1-107-63374-2 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement a comparative study Treaty enforcement in domestic courts : a comparative analysis Does international law obligate states to open their national courts to persons for the invocation of treaty norms that protect or benefit persons? Australia Canada Germany India Israel The Netherlands Poland Russian Federation South Africa United Kingdom United States The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : summary and conclusions Treaties International and municipal law Jurisdiction Jurisdiction (International law) |
| title | The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement a comparative study |
| title_alt | Treaty enforcement in domestic courts : a comparative analysis Does international law obligate states to open their national courts to persons for the invocation of treaty norms that protect or benefit persons? Australia Canada Germany India Israel The Netherlands Poland Russian Federation South Africa United Kingdom United States The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : summary and conclusions |
| title_auth | The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement a comparative study |
| title_exact_search | The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement a comparative study |
| title_full | The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement a comparative study edited by David Sloss |
| title_fullStr | The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement a comparative study edited by David Sloss |
| title_full_unstemmed | The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement a comparative study edited by David Sloss |
| title_short | The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement |
| title_sort | the role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement a comparative study |
| title_sub | a comparative study |
| topic | Treaties International and municipal law Jurisdiction Jurisdiction (International law) |
| topic_facet | Treaties International and municipal law Jurisdiction Jurisdiction (International law) |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT slossdavid theroleofdomesticcourtsintreatyenforcementacomparativestudy |