Conscientious objection in health care: an ethical analysis
Historically associated with military service, conscientious objection has become a significant phenomenon in health care. Mark Wicclair offers a comprehensive ethical analysis of conscientious objection in three representative health care professions: medicine, nursing and pharmacy. He critically e...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2011
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | DE-12 DE-92 DE-473 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
Zusammenfassung: | Historically associated with military service, conscientious objection has become a significant phenomenon in health care. Mark Wicclair offers a comprehensive ethical analysis of conscientious objection in three representative health care professions: medicine, nursing and pharmacy. He critically examines two extreme positions: the 'incompatibility thesis', that it is contrary to the professional obligations of practitioners to refuse provision of any service within the scope of their professional competence; and 'conscience absolutism', that they should be exempted from performing any action contrary to their conscience. He argues for a compromise approach that accommodates conscience-based refusals within the limits of specified ethical constraints. He also explores conscientious objection by students in each of the three professions, discusses conscience protection legislation and conscience-based refusals by pharmacies and hospitals, and analyzes several cases. His book is a valuable resource for scholars, professionals, trainees, students, and anyone interested in this increasingly important aspect of health care |
Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xiii, 252 pages) |
ISBN: | 9780511973727 |
DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511973727 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV043924523 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 161202s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780511973727 |c Online |9 978-0-511-97372-7 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511973727 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511973727 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)852504118 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043924523 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 |a DE-92 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 174.2 |2 22 | |
084 | |a BK 8200 |0 (DE-625)11966: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a CC 7264 |0 (DE-625)17679: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wicclair, Mark R. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Conscientious objection in health care |b an ethical analysis |c Mark R. Wicclair |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2011 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (xiii, 252 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
505 | 8 | |a Machine generated contents note: Preface; 1. Introduction; 2. Three approaches to conscientious objection in health care: conscience absolutism, the incompatibility thesis, and compromise; 3. Ethical limitations on the exercise of conscience; 4. Pharmacies, health care institutions, and conscientious objection; 5. Students, residents, and conscience-based exemptions; 6. Conscience clauses: too little and too much protection; References | |
520 | |a Historically associated with military service, conscientious objection has become a significant phenomenon in health care. Mark Wicclair offers a comprehensive ethical analysis of conscientious objection in three representative health care professions: medicine, nursing and pharmacy. He critically examines two extreme positions: the 'incompatibility thesis', that it is contrary to the professional obligations of practitioners to refuse provision of any service within the scope of their professional competence; and 'conscience absolutism', that they should be exempted from performing any action contrary to their conscience. He argues for a compromise approach that accommodates conscience-based refusals within the limits of specified ethical constraints. He also explores conscientious objection by students in each of the three professions, discusses conscience protection legislation and conscience-based refusals by pharmacies and hospitals, and analyzes several cases. His book is a valuable resource for scholars, professionals, trainees, students, and anyone interested in this increasingly important aspect of health care | ||
650 | 4 | |a Medical ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Conscientious objection | |
650 | 4 | |a Refusal to treat | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gewissen |0 (DE-588)4020922-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Medizinische Ethik |0 (DE-588)4074672-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Medizinische Ethik |0 (DE-588)4074672-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Gewissen |0 (DE-588)4020922-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-51431-6 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-73543-8 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973727 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029333602 | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973727 |l DE-12 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973727 |l DE-92 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q FHN_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973727 |l DE-473 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1811034776101978112 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Wicclair, Mark R. |
author_facet | Wicclair, Mark R. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Wicclair, Mark R. |
author_variant | m r w mr mrw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV043924523 |
classification_rvk | BK 8200 CC 7264 |
collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
contents | Machine generated contents note: Preface; 1. Introduction; 2. Three approaches to conscientious objection in health care: conscience absolutism, the incompatibility thesis, and compromise; 3. Ethical limitations on the exercise of conscience; 4. Pharmacies, health care institutions, and conscientious objection; 5. Students, residents, and conscience-based exemptions; 6. Conscience clauses: too little and too much protection; References |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511973727 (OCoLC)852504118 (DE-599)BVBBV043924523 |
dewey-full | 174.2 |
dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-ones | 174 - Occupational ethics |
dewey-raw | 174.2 |
dewey-search | 174.2 |
dewey-sort | 3174.2 |
dewey-tens | 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy) |
discipline | Philosophie Theologie / Religionswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511973727 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043924523</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511973727</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-97372-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511973727</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511973727</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)852504118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043924523</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">174.2</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BK 8200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)11966:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 7264</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17679:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wicclair, Mark R.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conscientious objection in health care</subfield><subfield code="b">an ethical analysis</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark R. Wicclair</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xiii, 252 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Machine generated contents note: Preface; 1. Introduction; 2. Three approaches to conscientious objection in health care: conscience absolutism, the incompatibility thesis, and compromise; 3. Ethical limitations on the exercise of conscience; 4. Pharmacies, health care institutions, and conscientious objection; 5. Students, residents, and conscience-based exemptions; 6. Conscience clauses: too little and too much protection; References</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Historically associated with military service, conscientious objection has become a significant phenomenon in health care. Mark Wicclair offers a comprehensive ethical analysis of conscientious objection in three representative health care professions: medicine, nursing and pharmacy. He critically examines two extreme positions: the 'incompatibility thesis', that it is contrary to the professional obligations of practitioners to refuse provision of any service within the scope of their professional competence; and 'conscience absolutism', that they should be exempted from performing any action contrary to their conscience. He argues for a compromise approach that accommodates conscience-based refusals within the limits of specified ethical constraints. He also explores conscientious objection by students in each of the three professions, discusses conscience protection legislation and conscience-based refusals by pharmacies and hospitals, and analyzes several cases. His book is a valuable resource for scholars, professionals, trainees, students, and anyone interested in this increasingly important aspect of health care</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medical ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conscientious objection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Refusal to treat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gewissen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020922-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Medizinische Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074672-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medizinische Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074672-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gewissen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020922-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-51431-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-73543-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973727</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029333602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973727</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973727</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">FHN_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973727</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV043924523 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-09-24T00:22:31Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780511973727 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029333602 |
oclc_num | 852504118 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-92 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-92 |
physical | 1 online resource (xiii, 252 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO FHN_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
publishDate | 2011 |
publishDateSearch | 2011 |
publishDateSort | 2011 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Wicclair, Mark R. Verfasser aut Conscientious objection in health care an ethical analysis Mark R. Wicclair Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2011 1 online resource (xiii, 252 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) Machine generated contents note: Preface; 1. Introduction; 2. Three approaches to conscientious objection in health care: conscience absolutism, the incompatibility thesis, and compromise; 3. Ethical limitations on the exercise of conscience; 4. Pharmacies, health care institutions, and conscientious objection; 5. Students, residents, and conscience-based exemptions; 6. Conscience clauses: too little and too much protection; References Historically associated with military service, conscientious objection has become a significant phenomenon in health care. Mark Wicclair offers a comprehensive ethical analysis of conscientious objection in three representative health care professions: medicine, nursing and pharmacy. He critically examines two extreme positions: the 'incompatibility thesis', that it is contrary to the professional obligations of practitioners to refuse provision of any service within the scope of their professional competence; and 'conscience absolutism', that they should be exempted from performing any action contrary to their conscience. He argues for a compromise approach that accommodates conscience-based refusals within the limits of specified ethical constraints. He also explores conscientious objection by students in each of the three professions, discusses conscience protection legislation and conscience-based refusals by pharmacies and hospitals, and analyzes several cases. His book is a valuable resource for scholars, professionals, trainees, students, and anyone interested in this increasingly important aspect of health care Medical ethics Conscientious objection Refusal to treat Gewissen (DE-588)4020922-2 gnd rswk-swf Medizinische Ethik (DE-588)4074672-0 gnd rswk-swf Medizinische Ethik (DE-588)4074672-0 s Gewissen (DE-588)4020922-2 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-51431-6 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-73543-8 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973727 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Wicclair, Mark R. Conscientious objection in health care an ethical analysis Machine generated contents note: Preface; 1. Introduction; 2. Three approaches to conscientious objection in health care: conscience absolutism, the incompatibility thesis, and compromise; 3. Ethical limitations on the exercise of conscience; 4. Pharmacies, health care institutions, and conscientious objection; 5. Students, residents, and conscience-based exemptions; 6. Conscience clauses: too little and too much protection; References Medical ethics Conscientious objection Refusal to treat Gewissen (DE-588)4020922-2 gnd Medizinische Ethik (DE-588)4074672-0 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4020922-2 (DE-588)4074672-0 |
title | Conscientious objection in health care an ethical analysis |
title_auth | Conscientious objection in health care an ethical analysis |
title_exact_search | Conscientious objection in health care an ethical analysis |
title_full | Conscientious objection in health care an ethical analysis Mark R. Wicclair |
title_fullStr | Conscientious objection in health care an ethical analysis Mark R. Wicclair |
title_full_unstemmed | Conscientious objection in health care an ethical analysis Mark R. Wicclair |
title_short | Conscientious objection in health care |
title_sort | conscientious objection in health care an ethical analysis |
title_sub | an ethical analysis |
topic | Medical ethics Conscientious objection Refusal to treat Gewissen (DE-588)4020922-2 gnd Medizinische Ethik (DE-588)4074672-0 gnd |
topic_facet | Medical ethics Conscientious objection Refusal to treat Gewissen Medizinische Ethik |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973727 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wicclairmarkr conscientiousobjectioninhealthcareanethicalanalysis |