Argumentation schemes:
This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation sche...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | BSB01 FHN01 FLA01 UBG01 UPA01 Volltext |
| Summary: | This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from the elementary exposition in the first chapter to the latest state of the art in the research efforts to formalize and classify the schemes, outlined in the last chapter. It provides a systematic and comprehensive account, with notation suitable for computational applications that increasingly make use of argumentation schemes |
| Item Description: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
| Physical Description: | 1 Online-Ressource (XII, 443 Seiten) Illustrationen |
| ISBN: | 9780511802034 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511802034 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043923698 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230707 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161202s2008 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511802034 |c Online |9 978-0-511-80203-4 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511802034 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511802034 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967412086 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043923698 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 |a DE-92 |a DE-860 |a DE-739 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a BC177 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 168 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a CC 2400 |0 (DE-625)17608: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a CC 2500 |0 (DE-625)17609: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a ES 675 |0 (DE-625)27872: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PHI 350f |2 stub | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Walton, Douglas N. |d 1942-2020 |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)177903198 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Argumentation schemes |c Douglas Walton, Chris Reed, Fabrizio Macagno |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2008 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XII, 443 Seiten) |b Illustrationen | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Introduction -- Basic tools in the state of the art -- Introducing argumentation schemes -- Argument from position to know and expert opinion -- Critical questions -- Enthymemes, schemes, and critical questions -- Argument diagramming tools -- Introducing Araucaria -- Problems to be solved -- How are schemes binding? -- Directions for AI -- Where we go from here -- Schemes for argument from analogy, classification, and precedent -- The case of the drug-sniffing dog -- Argument from analogy as treated in logic textbooks -- Is argument from analogy deductive or inductive? -- The schemes for argument from analogy -- Argument from analogy as a defeasible form of argument -- Arguments from classification -- Arguments based on rules and classifications -- Argument from precedent and practical argument from analogy -- The case of the drug-sniffing dog again -- Conclusions | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Argument for constitutive-rule claims -- Argument from rules -- Argument for an exceptional case -- Argument from precedent -- Argument from plea for excuse -- Argument from perception -- Argument from memory -- Refining the classification of schemes -- A proposed general system for classification of schemes -- Classification of ad hominem schemes -- Classifying the subtypes of ad hominem arguments -- Complications -- Conclusions -- Formalizing schemes -- The defeasible modus ponens form of schemes -- Schemes in AML -- Elements of a formalization of schemes -- Formalization of schemes in the carneades system -- Formally modeling the critical questions -- The argument interchange format -- The research project for developing a formal system -- Schemes in dialogue -- Summary of the dialectical system ASD -- A worked example of a dialogue in ASD -- Conclusions -- Schemes in computer systems -- Schemes in Araucaria -- Schemes in ArguMed -- Schemes in Compendium -- Schemes in rationale -- Schemes in natural language argumentation -- Schemes in interagent communication -- Schemes in automated reasoning -- Schemes in computational applications -- Conclusions | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Argument from verbal classification -- Argument from definition to verbal classification -- Argument from vagueness of a verbal classification -- Argument from arbitrariness of a verbal classification -- Argument from interaction of act and person -- Argument from values -- Argument from sacrifice -- Argument from the group and its members -- Practical reasoning -- Two-person practical reasoning -- Argument from waste -- Argument from sunk costs -- Argument from ignorance -- Epistemic argument from ignorance -- Argument from cause to effect -- Argument from correlation to cause -- Argument from sign -- Abductive argumentation scheme -- Argument from evidence to a hypothesis -- Argument from consequences -- Pragmatic argument from alternatives -- Argument from threat -- Argument from fear appeal -- Argument from danger appeal -- Argument from need for help -- Argument from distress -- Argument from commitment -- Ethotic argument -- Generic ad hominem -- Pragmatic inconsistency -- Argument from inconsistent commitment -- Circumstantial ad hominem -- Argument from bias -- Bias ad hominem -- Argument from gradualism -- Slippery slope argument -- Precedent slippery slope argument -- Sorites slippery slope argument -- Verbal slippery slope argument -- Full slippery slope argument | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Limitations of schemes -- Discussion of cases --The attribution problem -- The dialectical component of the enthymeme machine -- Attack, rebuttal, and refutation -- Attacking, questioning, rebutting, and refuting -- Older theories of refutation -- Newer theories of refutation -- Argumentation schemes and critical questions -- Toward a pragmatic theory of refutation -- A case study of combined rebuttals -- The problem of argument from opposites -- Problems about critical questions and refutations -- The history of schemes -- Aristotle on the topics -- Cicero -- Boethius -- From Abelard to the thirteenth century -- Fourteenth-century logic -- Topics in the renaissance and the Port Royal logic -- Modern theories of schemes -- Conclusions -- A user's compendium of schemes -- Argument from position to know -- Argument from expert opinion -- Argument from witness testimony -- Argument from popular opinion (and subtypes) -- Argument from popular practice -- Argument from example -- Argument from analogy -- Practical reasoning from analogy -- Argument from composition -- Argument from division -- Argument from oppositions -- Rhetorical argument from oppositions -- Argument from alternatives | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Knowledge-related, practical, and other schemes -- Arguments from knowledge -- Practical reasoning -- Lack-of-knowledge arguments -- Arguments from consequences -- Fear and danger appeals -- Arguments from alternatives and opposites -- Pleas for help and excuses -- Composition and division arguments -- Slippery slope arguments -- Attacking verbal classification and slippery slope arguments -- Arguments from generally accepted opinions, commitment, and character -- Arguments from popular opinion -- Variants of the basic form -- Argument from commitment -- Arguments from inconsistency -- Ethotic arguments -- Circumstantial ad hominem -- Argument from bias -- Ad hominem strategies to rebut a personal attack -- Causal argumentation schemes -- The problem of causation -- Argument from cause to effect -- Argument from effect to cause -- Argument from correlation to cause -- Cases in point -- Causal argumentation at stages of an investigation -- Causal assertions as defeasible --Toward a system of analysis and classification -- Dialectical and Bayesian models of causal argumentation -- Schemes and enthymemes -- Introduction -- Preliminary discussion of the problem -- A deductive case -- Limitations of deductive analysis -- Use of argumentation schemes in analysis -- Use of schemes in analyzing weak arguments | |
| 520 | |a This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from the elementary exposition in the first chapter to the latest state of the art in the research efforts to formalize and classify the schemes, outlined in the last chapter. It provides a systematic and comprehensive account, with notation suitable for computational applications that increasingly make use of argumentation schemes | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Reasoning | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Argumentationstheorie |0 (DE-588)4112589-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentationstheorie |0 (DE-588)4112589-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Reed, Chris |d 19XX- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)172536774 |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Macagno, Fabrizio |d 1979- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1052195776 |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 978-0-521-89790-7 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-0-521-72374-9 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029332777 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 |l FHN01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q FHN_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 |l FLA01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q FLA01_CBO_Kauf |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 |l UPA01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UPA_Einzelkauf_2023 |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804176848275374080 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Walton, Douglas N. 1942-2020 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)177903198 (DE-588)172536774 (DE-588)1052195776 |
| author_facet | Walton, Douglas N. 1942-2020 |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Walton, Douglas N. 1942-2020 |
| author_variant | d n w dn dnw |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043923698 |
| callnumber-first | B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| callnumber-label | BC177 |
| callnumber-raw | BC177 |
| callnumber-search | BC177 |
| callnumber-sort | BC 3177 |
| callnumber-subject | BC - Logic |
| classification_rvk | CC 2400 CC 2500 ES 675 |
| classification_tum | PHI 350f |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| contents | Introduction -- Basic tools in the state of the art -- Introducing argumentation schemes -- Argument from position to know and expert opinion -- Critical questions -- Enthymemes, schemes, and critical questions -- Argument diagramming tools -- Introducing Araucaria -- Problems to be solved -- How are schemes binding? -- Directions for AI -- Where we go from here -- Schemes for argument from analogy, classification, and precedent -- The case of the drug-sniffing dog -- Argument from analogy as treated in logic textbooks -- Is argument from analogy deductive or inductive? -- The schemes for argument from analogy -- Argument from analogy as a defeasible form of argument -- Arguments from classification -- Arguments based on rules and classifications -- Argument from precedent and practical argument from analogy -- The case of the drug-sniffing dog again -- Conclusions Argument for constitutive-rule claims -- Argument from rules -- Argument for an exceptional case -- Argument from precedent -- Argument from plea for excuse -- Argument from perception -- Argument from memory -- Refining the classification of schemes -- A proposed general system for classification of schemes -- Classification of ad hominem schemes -- Classifying the subtypes of ad hominem arguments -- Complications -- Conclusions -- Formalizing schemes -- The defeasible modus ponens form of schemes -- Schemes in AML -- Elements of a formalization of schemes -- Formalization of schemes in the carneades system -- Formally modeling the critical questions -- The argument interchange format -- The research project for developing a formal system -- Schemes in dialogue -- Summary of the dialectical system ASD -- A worked example of a dialogue in ASD -- Conclusions -- Schemes in computer systems -- Schemes in Araucaria -- Schemes in ArguMed -- Schemes in Compendium -- Schemes in rationale -- Schemes in natural language argumentation -- Schemes in interagent communication -- Schemes in automated reasoning -- Schemes in computational applications -- Conclusions Argument from verbal classification -- Argument from definition to verbal classification -- Argument from vagueness of a verbal classification -- Argument from arbitrariness of a verbal classification -- Argument from interaction of act and person -- Argument from values -- Argument from sacrifice -- Argument from the group and its members -- Practical reasoning -- Two-person practical reasoning -- Argument from waste -- Argument from sunk costs -- Argument from ignorance -- Epistemic argument from ignorance -- Argument from cause to effect -- Argument from correlation to cause -- Argument from sign -- Abductive argumentation scheme -- Argument from evidence to a hypothesis -- Argument from consequences -- Pragmatic argument from alternatives -- Argument from threat -- Argument from fear appeal -- Argument from danger appeal -- Argument from need for help -- Argument from distress -- Argument from commitment -- Ethotic argument -- Generic ad hominem -- Pragmatic inconsistency -- Argument from inconsistent commitment -- Circumstantial ad hominem -- Argument from bias -- Bias ad hominem -- Argument from gradualism -- Slippery slope argument -- Precedent slippery slope argument -- Sorites slippery slope argument -- Verbal slippery slope argument -- Full slippery slope argument Limitations of schemes -- Discussion of cases --The attribution problem -- The dialectical component of the enthymeme machine -- Attack, rebuttal, and refutation -- Attacking, questioning, rebutting, and refuting -- Older theories of refutation -- Newer theories of refutation -- Argumentation schemes and critical questions -- Toward a pragmatic theory of refutation -- A case study of combined rebuttals -- The problem of argument from opposites -- Problems about critical questions and refutations -- The history of schemes -- Aristotle on the topics -- Cicero -- Boethius -- From Abelard to the thirteenth century -- Fourteenth-century logic -- Topics in the renaissance and the Port Royal logic -- Modern theories of schemes -- Conclusions -- A user's compendium of schemes -- Argument from position to know -- Argument from expert opinion -- Argument from witness testimony -- Argument from popular opinion (and subtypes) -- Argument from popular practice -- Argument from example -- Argument from analogy -- Practical reasoning from analogy -- Argument from composition -- Argument from division -- Argument from oppositions -- Rhetorical argument from oppositions -- Argument from alternatives Knowledge-related, practical, and other schemes -- Arguments from knowledge -- Practical reasoning -- Lack-of-knowledge arguments -- Arguments from consequences -- Fear and danger appeals -- Arguments from alternatives and opposites -- Pleas for help and excuses -- Composition and division arguments -- Slippery slope arguments -- Attacking verbal classification and slippery slope arguments -- Arguments from generally accepted opinions, commitment, and character -- Arguments from popular opinion -- Variants of the basic form -- Argument from commitment -- Arguments from inconsistency -- Ethotic arguments -- Circumstantial ad hominem -- Argument from bias -- Ad hominem strategies to rebut a personal attack -- Causal argumentation schemes -- The problem of causation -- Argument from cause to effect -- Argument from effect to cause -- Argument from correlation to cause -- Cases in point -- Causal argumentation at stages of an investigation -- Causal assertions as defeasible --Toward a system of analysis and classification -- Dialectical and Bayesian models of causal argumentation -- Schemes and enthymemes -- Introduction -- Preliminary discussion of the problem -- A deductive case -- Limitations of deductive analysis -- Use of argumentation schemes in analysis -- Use of schemes in analyzing weak arguments |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511802034 (OCoLC)967412086 (DE-599)BVBBV043923698 |
| dewey-full | 168 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 168 - Argument and persuasion |
| dewey-raw | 168 |
| dewey-search | 168 |
| dewey-sort | 3168 |
| dewey-tens | 160 - Philosophical logic |
| discipline | Sprachwissenschaft Philosophie / Ethik Philosophie Literaturwissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511802034 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>09140nmm a2200625zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043923698</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230707 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2008 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511802034</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-80203-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511802034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511802034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967412086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043923698</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BC177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">168</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 2400</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17608:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 2500</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17609:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ES 675</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)27872:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHI 350f</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Walton, Douglas N.</subfield><subfield code="d">1942-2020</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)177903198</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Argumentation schemes</subfield><subfield code="c">Douglas Walton, Chris Reed, Fabrizio Macagno</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XII, 443 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction -- Basic tools in the state of the art -- Introducing argumentation schemes -- Argument from position to know and expert opinion -- Critical questions -- Enthymemes, schemes, and critical questions -- Argument diagramming tools -- Introducing Araucaria -- Problems to be solved -- How are schemes binding? -- Directions for AI -- Where we go from here -- Schemes for argument from analogy, classification, and precedent -- The case of the drug-sniffing dog -- Argument from analogy as treated in logic textbooks -- Is argument from analogy deductive or inductive? -- The schemes for argument from analogy -- Argument from analogy as a defeasible form of argument -- Arguments from classification -- Arguments based on rules and classifications -- Argument from precedent and practical argument from analogy -- The case of the drug-sniffing dog again -- Conclusions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Argument for constitutive-rule claims -- Argument from rules -- Argument for an exceptional case -- Argument from precedent -- Argument from plea for excuse -- Argument from perception -- Argument from memory -- Refining the classification of schemes -- A proposed general system for classification of schemes -- Classification of ad hominem schemes -- Classifying the subtypes of ad hominem arguments -- Complications -- Conclusions -- Formalizing schemes -- The defeasible modus ponens form of schemes -- Schemes in AML -- Elements of a formalization of schemes -- Formalization of schemes in the carneades system -- Formally modeling the critical questions -- The argument interchange format -- The research project for developing a formal system -- Schemes in dialogue -- Summary of the dialectical system ASD -- A worked example of a dialogue in ASD -- Conclusions -- Schemes in computer systems -- Schemes in Araucaria -- Schemes in ArguMed -- Schemes in Compendium -- Schemes in rationale -- Schemes in natural language argumentation -- Schemes in interagent communication -- Schemes in automated reasoning -- Schemes in computational applications -- Conclusions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Argument from verbal classification -- Argument from definition to verbal classification -- Argument from vagueness of a verbal classification -- Argument from arbitrariness of a verbal classification -- Argument from interaction of act and person -- Argument from values -- Argument from sacrifice -- Argument from the group and its members -- Practical reasoning -- Two-person practical reasoning -- Argument from waste -- Argument from sunk costs -- Argument from ignorance -- Epistemic argument from ignorance -- Argument from cause to effect -- Argument from correlation to cause -- Argument from sign -- Abductive argumentation scheme -- Argument from evidence to a hypothesis -- Argument from consequences -- Pragmatic argument from alternatives -- Argument from threat -- Argument from fear appeal -- Argument from danger appeal -- Argument from need for help -- Argument from distress -- Argument from commitment -- Ethotic argument -- Generic ad hominem -- Pragmatic inconsistency -- Argument from inconsistent commitment -- Circumstantial ad hominem -- Argument from bias -- Bias ad hominem -- Argument from gradualism -- Slippery slope argument -- Precedent slippery slope argument -- Sorites slippery slope argument -- Verbal slippery slope argument -- Full slippery slope argument</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Limitations of schemes -- Discussion of cases --The attribution problem -- The dialectical component of the enthymeme machine -- Attack, rebuttal, and refutation -- Attacking, questioning, rebutting, and refuting -- Older theories of refutation -- Newer theories of refutation -- Argumentation schemes and critical questions -- Toward a pragmatic theory of refutation -- A case study of combined rebuttals -- The problem of argument from opposites -- Problems about critical questions and refutations -- The history of schemes -- Aristotle on the topics -- Cicero -- Boethius -- From Abelard to the thirteenth century -- Fourteenth-century logic -- Topics in the renaissance and the Port Royal logic -- Modern theories of schemes -- Conclusions -- A user's compendium of schemes -- Argument from position to know -- Argument from expert opinion -- Argument from witness testimony -- Argument from popular opinion (and subtypes) -- Argument from popular practice -- Argument from example -- Argument from analogy -- Practical reasoning from analogy -- Argument from composition -- Argument from division -- Argument from oppositions -- Rhetorical argument from oppositions -- Argument from alternatives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Knowledge-related, practical, and other schemes -- Arguments from knowledge -- Practical reasoning -- Lack-of-knowledge arguments -- Arguments from consequences -- Fear and danger appeals -- Arguments from alternatives and opposites -- Pleas for help and excuses -- Composition and division arguments -- Slippery slope arguments -- Attacking verbal classification and slippery slope arguments -- Arguments from generally accepted opinions, commitment, and character -- Arguments from popular opinion -- Variants of the basic form -- Argument from commitment -- Arguments from inconsistency -- Ethotic arguments -- Circumstantial ad hominem -- Argument from bias -- Ad hominem strategies to rebut a personal attack -- Causal argumentation schemes -- The problem of causation -- Argument from cause to effect -- Argument from effect to cause -- Argument from correlation to cause -- Cases in point -- Causal argumentation at stages of an investigation -- Causal assertions as defeasible --Toward a system of analysis and classification -- Dialectical and Bayesian models of causal argumentation -- Schemes and enthymemes -- Introduction -- Preliminary discussion of the problem -- A deductive case -- Limitations of deductive analysis -- Use of argumentation schemes in analysis -- Use of schemes in analyzing weak arguments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from the elementary exposition in the first chapter to the latest state of the art in the research efforts to formalize and classify the schemes, outlined in the last chapter. It provides a systematic and comprehensive account, with notation suitable for computational applications that increasingly make use of argumentation schemes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reasoning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Argumentationstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4112589-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Argumentationstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4112589-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reed, Chris</subfield><subfield code="d">19XX-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)172536774</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Macagno, Fabrizio</subfield><subfield code="d">1979-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1052195776</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-89790-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-72374-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029332777</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034</subfield><subfield code="l">FHN01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">FHN_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034</subfield><subfield code="l">FLA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA01_CBO_Kauf</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_Einzelkauf_2023</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043923698 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:42Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780511802034 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029332777 |
| oclc_num | 967412086 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-92 DE-860 DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-92 DE-860 DE-739 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XII, 443 Seiten) Illustrationen |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO FHN_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO FLA01_CBO_Kauf ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UPA_Einzelkauf_2023 |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publishDateSearch | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Walton, Douglas N. 1942-2020 Verfasser (DE-588)177903198 aut Argumentation schemes Douglas Walton, Chris Reed, Fabrizio Macagno Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2008 1 Online-Ressource (XII, 443 Seiten) Illustrationen txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) Introduction -- Basic tools in the state of the art -- Introducing argumentation schemes -- Argument from position to know and expert opinion -- Critical questions -- Enthymemes, schemes, and critical questions -- Argument diagramming tools -- Introducing Araucaria -- Problems to be solved -- How are schemes binding? -- Directions for AI -- Where we go from here -- Schemes for argument from analogy, classification, and precedent -- The case of the drug-sniffing dog -- Argument from analogy as treated in logic textbooks -- Is argument from analogy deductive or inductive? -- The schemes for argument from analogy -- Argument from analogy as a defeasible form of argument -- Arguments from classification -- Arguments based on rules and classifications -- Argument from precedent and practical argument from analogy -- The case of the drug-sniffing dog again -- Conclusions Argument for constitutive-rule claims -- Argument from rules -- Argument for an exceptional case -- Argument from precedent -- Argument from plea for excuse -- Argument from perception -- Argument from memory -- Refining the classification of schemes -- A proposed general system for classification of schemes -- Classification of ad hominem schemes -- Classifying the subtypes of ad hominem arguments -- Complications -- Conclusions -- Formalizing schemes -- The defeasible modus ponens form of schemes -- Schemes in AML -- Elements of a formalization of schemes -- Formalization of schemes in the carneades system -- Formally modeling the critical questions -- The argument interchange format -- The research project for developing a formal system -- Schemes in dialogue -- Summary of the dialectical system ASD -- A worked example of a dialogue in ASD -- Conclusions -- Schemes in computer systems -- Schemes in Araucaria -- Schemes in ArguMed -- Schemes in Compendium -- Schemes in rationale -- Schemes in natural language argumentation -- Schemes in interagent communication -- Schemes in automated reasoning -- Schemes in computational applications -- Conclusions Argument from verbal classification -- Argument from definition to verbal classification -- Argument from vagueness of a verbal classification -- Argument from arbitrariness of a verbal classification -- Argument from interaction of act and person -- Argument from values -- Argument from sacrifice -- Argument from the group and its members -- Practical reasoning -- Two-person practical reasoning -- Argument from waste -- Argument from sunk costs -- Argument from ignorance -- Epistemic argument from ignorance -- Argument from cause to effect -- Argument from correlation to cause -- Argument from sign -- Abductive argumentation scheme -- Argument from evidence to a hypothesis -- Argument from consequences -- Pragmatic argument from alternatives -- Argument from threat -- Argument from fear appeal -- Argument from danger appeal -- Argument from need for help -- Argument from distress -- Argument from commitment -- Ethotic argument -- Generic ad hominem -- Pragmatic inconsistency -- Argument from inconsistent commitment -- Circumstantial ad hominem -- Argument from bias -- Bias ad hominem -- Argument from gradualism -- Slippery slope argument -- Precedent slippery slope argument -- Sorites slippery slope argument -- Verbal slippery slope argument -- Full slippery slope argument Limitations of schemes -- Discussion of cases --The attribution problem -- The dialectical component of the enthymeme machine -- Attack, rebuttal, and refutation -- Attacking, questioning, rebutting, and refuting -- Older theories of refutation -- Newer theories of refutation -- Argumentation schemes and critical questions -- Toward a pragmatic theory of refutation -- A case study of combined rebuttals -- The problem of argument from opposites -- Problems about critical questions and refutations -- The history of schemes -- Aristotle on the topics -- Cicero -- Boethius -- From Abelard to the thirteenth century -- Fourteenth-century logic -- Topics in the renaissance and the Port Royal logic -- Modern theories of schemes -- Conclusions -- A user's compendium of schemes -- Argument from position to know -- Argument from expert opinion -- Argument from witness testimony -- Argument from popular opinion (and subtypes) -- Argument from popular practice -- Argument from example -- Argument from analogy -- Practical reasoning from analogy -- Argument from composition -- Argument from division -- Argument from oppositions -- Rhetorical argument from oppositions -- Argument from alternatives Knowledge-related, practical, and other schemes -- Arguments from knowledge -- Practical reasoning -- Lack-of-knowledge arguments -- Arguments from consequences -- Fear and danger appeals -- Arguments from alternatives and opposites -- Pleas for help and excuses -- Composition and division arguments -- Slippery slope arguments -- Attacking verbal classification and slippery slope arguments -- Arguments from generally accepted opinions, commitment, and character -- Arguments from popular opinion -- Variants of the basic form -- Argument from commitment -- Arguments from inconsistency -- Ethotic arguments -- Circumstantial ad hominem -- Argument from bias -- Ad hominem strategies to rebut a personal attack -- Causal argumentation schemes -- The problem of causation -- Argument from cause to effect -- Argument from effect to cause -- Argument from correlation to cause -- Cases in point -- Causal argumentation at stages of an investigation -- Causal assertions as defeasible --Toward a system of analysis and classification -- Dialectical and Bayesian models of causal argumentation -- Schemes and enthymemes -- Introduction -- Preliminary discussion of the problem -- A deductive case -- Limitations of deductive analysis -- Use of argumentation schemes in analysis -- Use of schemes in analyzing weak arguments This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from the elementary exposition in the first chapter to the latest state of the art in the research efforts to formalize and classify the schemes, outlined in the last chapter. It provides a systematic and comprehensive account, with notation suitable for computational applications that increasingly make use of argumentation schemes Reasoning Argumentationstheorie (DE-588)4112589-7 gnd rswk-swf Argumentationstheorie (DE-588)4112589-7 s 1\p DE-604 Reed, Chris 19XX- Sonstige (DE-588)172536774 oth Macagno, Fabrizio 1979- Sonstige (DE-588)1052195776 oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 978-0-521-89790-7 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-0-521-72374-9 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Walton, Douglas N. 1942-2020 Argumentation schemes Introduction -- Basic tools in the state of the art -- Introducing argumentation schemes -- Argument from position to know and expert opinion -- Critical questions -- Enthymemes, schemes, and critical questions -- Argument diagramming tools -- Introducing Araucaria -- Problems to be solved -- How are schemes binding? -- Directions for AI -- Where we go from here -- Schemes for argument from analogy, classification, and precedent -- The case of the drug-sniffing dog -- Argument from analogy as treated in logic textbooks -- Is argument from analogy deductive or inductive? -- The schemes for argument from analogy -- Argument from analogy as a defeasible form of argument -- Arguments from classification -- Arguments based on rules and classifications -- Argument from precedent and practical argument from analogy -- The case of the drug-sniffing dog again -- Conclusions Argument for constitutive-rule claims -- Argument from rules -- Argument for an exceptional case -- Argument from precedent -- Argument from plea for excuse -- Argument from perception -- Argument from memory -- Refining the classification of schemes -- A proposed general system for classification of schemes -- Classification of ad hominem schemes -- Classifying the subtypes of ad hominem arguments -- Complications -- Conclusions -- Formalizing schemes -- The defeasible modus ponens form of schemes -- Schemes in AML -- Elements of a formalization of schemes -- Formalization of schemes in the carneades system -- Formally modeling the critical questions -- The argument interchange format -- The research project for developing a formal system -- Schemes in dialogue -- Summary of the dialectical system ASD -- A worked example of a dialogue in ASD -- Conclusions -- Schemes in computer systems -- Schemes in Araucaria -- Schemes in ArguMed -- Schemes in Compendium -- Schemes in rationale -- Schemes in natural language argumentation -- Schemes in interagent communication -- Schemes in automated reasoning -- Schemes in computational applications -- Conclusions Argument from verbal classification -- Argument from definition to verbal classification -- Argument from vagueness of a verbal classification -- Argument from arbitrariness of a verbal classification -- Argument from interaction of act and person -- Argument from values -- Argument from sacrifice -- Argument from the group and its members -- Practical reasoning -- Two-person practical reasoning -- Argument from waste -- Argument from sunk costs -- Argument from ignorance -- Epistemic argument from ignorance -- Argument from cause to effect -- Argument from correlation to cause -- Argument from sign -- Abductive argumentation scheme -- Argument from evidence to a hypothesis -- Argument from consequences -- Pragmatic argument from alternatives -- Argument from threat -- Argument from fear appeal -- Argument from danger appeal -- Argument from need for help -- Argument from distress -- Argument from commitment -- Ethotic argument -- Generic ad hominem -- Pragmatic inconsistency -- Argument from inconsistent commitment -- Circumstantial ad hominem -- Argument from bias -- Bias ad hominem -- Argument from gradualism -- Slippery slope argument -- Precedent slippery slope argument -- Sorites slippery slope argument -- Verbal slippery slope argument -- Full slippery slope argument Limitations of schemes -- Discussion of cases --The attribution problem -- The dialectical component of the enthymeme machine -- Attack, rebuttal, and refutation -- Attacking, questioning, rebutting, and refuting -- Older theories of refutation -- Newer theories of refutation -- Argumentation schemes and critical questions -- Toward a pragmatic theory of refutation -- A case study of combined rebuttals -- The problem of argument from opposites -- Problems about critical questions and refutations -- The history of schemes -- Aristotle on the topics -- Cicero -- Boethius -- From Abelard to the thirteenth century -- Fourteenth-century logic -- Topics in the renaissance and the Port Royal logic -- Modern theories of schemes -- Conclusions -- A user's compendium of schemes -- Argument from position to know -- Argument from expert opinion -- Argument from witness testimony -- Argument from popular opinion (and subtypes) -- Argument from popular practice -- Argument from example -- Argument from analogy -- Practical reasoning from analogy -- Argument from composition -- Argument from division -- Argument from oppositions -- Rhetorical argument from oppositions -- Argument from alternatives Knowledge-related, practical, and other schemes -- Arguments from knowledge -- Practical reasoning -- Lack-of-knowledge arguments -- Arguments from consequences -- Fear and danger appeals -- Arguments from alternatives and opposites -- Pleas for help and excuses -- Composition and division arguments -- Slippery slope arguments -- Attacking verbal classification and slippery slope arguments -- Arguments from generally accepted opinions, commitment, and character -- Arguments from popular opinion -- Variants of the basic form -- Argument from commitment -- Arguments from inconsistency -- Ethotic arguments -- Circumstantial ad hominem -- Argument from bias -- Ad hominem strategies to rebut a personal attack -- Causal argumentation schemes -- The problem of causation -- Argument from cause to effect -- Argument from effect to cause -- Argument from correlation to cause -- Cases in point -- Causal argumentation at stages of an investigation -- Causal assertions as defeasible --Toward a system of analysis and classification -- Dialectical and Bayesian models of causal argumentation -- Schemes and enthymemes -- Introduction -- Preliminary discussion of the problem -- A deductive case -- Limitations of deductive analysis -- Use of argumentation schemes in analysis -- Use of schemes in analyzing weak arguments Reasoning Argumentationstheorie (DE-588)4112589-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4112589-7 |
| title | Argumentation schemes |
| title_auth | Argumentation schemes |
| title_exact_search | Argumentation schemes |
| title_full | Argumentation schemes Douglas Walton, Chris Reed, Fabrizio Macagno |
| title_fullStr | Argumentation schemes Douglas Walton, Chris Reed, Fabrizio Macagno |
| title_full_unstemmed | Argumentation schemes Douglas Walton, Chris Reed, Fabrizio Macagno |
| title_short | Argumentation schemes |
| title_sort | argumentation schemes |
| topic | Reasoning Argumentationstheorie (DE-588)4112589-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Reasoning Argumentationstheorie |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT waltondouglasn argumentationschemes AT reedchris argumentationschemes AT macagnofabrizio argumentationschemes |