Proportionality and constitutional culture:
Although the most important constitutional doctrine worldwide, a thorough cultural and historical examination of proportionality has not taken place until now. This comparison of proportionality with its counterpart in American constitutional law - balancing - shows how culture and history can creat...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2013
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge studies in constitutional law
7 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
| Zusammenfassung: | Although the most important constitutional doctrine worldwide, a thorough cultural and historical examination of proportionality has not taken place until now. This comparison of proportionality with its counterpart in American constitutional law - balancing - shows how culture and history can create deep differences in seemingly similar doctrines. Owing to its historical origin in Germany, proportionality carries to this day a pro-rights association, while the opposite is the case for balancing. In addition, European legal and political culture has shaped proportionality as intrinsic to the state's role in realizing shared values, while in the United States a suspicion-based legal and political culture has shaped balancing in more pragmatic and instrumental terms. Although many argue that the USA should converge on proportionality, the book shows that a complex web of cultural associations make it an unlikely prospect |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xii, 168 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9781139134996 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9781139134996 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043922247 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161202s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139134996 |c Online |9 978-1-139-13499-6 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9781139134996 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781139134996 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)885218183 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043922247 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.001 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a PL 625 |0 (DE-625)137089: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cohen-Eliya, Moshe |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Proportionality and constitutional culture |c Moshe Cohen-Eliya and Iddo Porat |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Proportionality & Constitutional Culture |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xii, 168 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in constitutional law |v 7 | |
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Global spread of proportionality and some analytical similarities with balancing -- History -- Culture -- Impact, intent, and indifference -- Epistemology -- Justification and authority -- The effects of proportionality | |
| 520 | |a Although the most important constitutional doctrine worldwide, a thorough cultural and historical examination of proportionality has not taken place until now. This comparison of proportionality with its counterpart in American constitutional law - balancing - shows how culture and history can create deep differences in seemingly similar doctrines. Owing to its historical origin in Germany, proportionality carries to this day a pro-rights association, while the opposite is the case for balancing. In addition, European legal and political culture has shaped proportionality as intrinsic to the state's role in realizing shared values, while in the United States a suspicion-based legal and political culture has shaped balancing in more pragmatic and instrumental terms. Although many argue that the USA should converge on proportionality, the book shows that a complex web of cultural associations make it an unlikely prospect | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Verfassungsrecht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Proportionality in law | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Güterabwägung |0 (DE-588)4158520-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz |0 (DE-588)4191765-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz |0 (DE-588)4191765-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Güterabwägung |0 (DE-588)4158520-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Porat, Iddo |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-1-107-02186-0 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-1-107-60571-8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139134996 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029331328 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139134996 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139134996 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804176845249183744 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Cohen-Eliya, Moshe |
| author_facet | Cohen-Eliya, Moshe |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Cohen-Eliya, Moshe |
| author_variant | m c e mce |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043922247 |
| classification_rvk | PL 625 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| contents | Global spread of proportionality and some analytical similarities with balancing -- History -- Culture -- Impact, intent, and indifference -- Epistemology -- Justification and authority -- The effects of proportionality |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781139134996 (OCoLC)885218183 (DE-599)BVBBV043922247 |
| dewey-full | 342.001 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.001 |
| dewey-search | 342.001 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.001 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9781139134996 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03808nmm a2200649zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043922247</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781139134996</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-139-13499-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9781139134996</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781139134996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)885218183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043922247</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.001</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 625</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137089:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cohen-Eliya, Moshe</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality and constitutional culture</subfield><subfield code="c">Moshe Cohen-Eliya and Iddo Porat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Proportionality & Constitutional Culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xii, 168 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="v">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Global spread of proportionality and some analytical similarities with balancing -- History -- Culture -- Impact, intent, and indifference -- Epistemology -- Justification and authority -- The effects of proportionality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although the most important constitutional doctrine worldwide, a thorough cultural and historical examination of proportionality has not taken place until now. This comparison of proportionality with its counterpart in American constitutional law - balancing - shows how culture and history can create deep differences in seemingly similar doctrines. Owing to its historical origin in Germany, proportionality carries to this day a pro-rights association, while the opposite is the case for balancing. In addition, European legal and political culture has shaped proportionality as intrinsic to the state's role in realizing shared values, while in the United States a suspicion-based legal and political culture has shaped balancing in more pragmatic and instrumental terms. Although many argue that the USA should converge on proportionality, the book shows that a complex web of cultural associations make it an unlikely prospect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Güterabwägung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4158520-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191765-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191765-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Güterabwägung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4158520-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Porat, Iddo</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-02186-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-60571-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139134996</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029331328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139134996</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139134996</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA Deutschland |
| id | DE-604.BV043922247 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:39Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781139134996 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029331328 |
| oclc_num | 885218183 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 online resource (xii, 168 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Cambridge studies in constitutional law |
| spelling | Cohen-Eliya, Moshe Verfasser aut Proportionality and constitutional culture Moshe Cohen-Eliya and Iddo Porat Proportionality & Constitutional Culture Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2013 1 online resource (xii, 168 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge studies in constitutional law 7 Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) Global spread of proportionality and some analytical similarities with balancing -- History -- Culture -- Impact, intent, and indifference -- Epistemology -- Justification and authority -- The effects of proportionality Although the most important constitutional doctrine worldwide, a thorough cultural and historical examination of proportionality has not taken place until now. This comparison of proportionality with its counterpart in American constitutional law - balancing - shows how culture and history can create deep differences in seemingly similar doctrines. Owing to its historical origin in Germany, proportionality carries to this day a pro-rights association, while the opposite is the case for balancing. In addition, European legal and political culture has shaped proportionality as intrinsic to the state's role in realizing shared values, while in the United States a suspicion-based legal and political culture has shaped balancing in more pragmatic and instrumental terms. Although many argue that the USA should converge on proportionality, the book shows that a complex web of cultural associations make it an unlikely prospect Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law Proportionality in law Güterabwägung (DE-588)4158520-3 gnd rswk-swf Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 g USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 s Güterabwägung (DE-588)4158520-3 s Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s 1\p DE-604 Porat, Iddo Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-1-107-02186-0 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-1-107-60571-8 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139134996 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Cohen-Eliya, Moshe Proportionality and constitutional culture Global spread of proportionality and some analytical similarities with balancing -- History -- Culture -- Impact, intent, and indifference -- Epistemology -- Justification and authority -- The effects of proportionality Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law Proportionality in law Güterabwägung (DE-588)4158520-3 gnd Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4158520-3 (DE-588)4191765-0 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4062801-2 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)4011882-4 |
| title | Proportionality and constitutional culture |
| title_alt | Proportionality & Constitutional Culture |
| title_auth | Proportionality and constitutional culture |
| title_exact_search | Proportionality and constitutional culture |
| title_full | Proportionality and constitutional culture Moshe Cohen-Eliya and Iddo Porat |
| title_fullStr | Proportionality and constitutional culture Moshe Cohen-Eliya and Iddo Porat |
| title_full_unstemmed | Proportionality and constitutional culture Moshe Cohen-Eliya and Iddo Porat |
| title_short | Proportionality and constitutional culture |
| title_sort | proportionality and constitutional culture |
| topic | Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law Proportionality in law Güterabwägung (DE-588)4158520-3 gnd Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law Proportionality in law Güterabwägung Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz Rechtsvergleich USA Deutschland |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139134996 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT coheneliyamoshe proportionalityandconstitutionalculture AT poratiddo proportionalityandconstitutionalculture AT coheneliyamoshe proportionalityconstitutionalculture AT poratiddo proportionalityconstitutionalculture |