German idealism and the concept of punishment:

Against the background of early modernism - a period that justified punishment by general deterrence - Kant is usually thought to represent a radical turn towards retributivism. For Kant, and later for Fichte and Hegel, a just punishment respects the humanity inherent in the criminal, and serves no...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Merle, Jean-Christophe (Author, Translator)
Other Authors: Kominkiewicz, Joseph J. (Translator), Brown, Frances (Translator)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2009
Series:Modern European philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:BSB01
UBG01
URL des Erstveröffentlichers
Summary:Against the background of early modernism - a period that justified punishment by general deterrence - Kant is usually thought to represent a radical turn towards retributivism. For Kant, and later for Fichte and Hegel, a just punishment respects the humanity inherent in the criminal, and serves no external ends - it is instituted only because the criminal deserves it. In this original study, Jean-Christophe Merle uses close analysis of texts to show that these philosophers did not in fact hold a retributivist position, or even a mixed position; instead he traces in their work the gradual emergence of views in favour of deterrence and resocialisation. He also examines Nietzsche's view that morality rests on the rejection of retribution. His final chapter offers a challenge to the retributivist position, and a defence of resocialisation, in the context of current legal theory and practice concerning the punishment of crimes against humanity
Item Description:Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)
Physical Description:1 online resource (xv, 207 pages)
ISBN:9780511770425
DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511770425