Evaluating campaign quality: can the electoral process be improved?
For a number of years, voters and academic observers have been dissatisfied with a number of elements of American campaigns. Contemporary races are seen as too negative, too superficial, and too unfair or misleading. Based on these complaints, a variety of reform organizations have targeted millions...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2007
|
Schriftenreihe: | Communication, society and politics
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | For a number of years, voters and academic observers have been dissatisfied with a number of elements of American campaigns. Contemporary races are seen as too negative, too superficial, and too unfair or misleading. Based on these complaints, a variety of reform organizations have targeted millions of dollars to improve the situation. Through their efforts and those within the academic community, a wide range of reform initiatives have been undertaken, such as voluntary codes of conduct, industry self-regulation, certificate programs, tougher ethics rules for consultants, and the encouragement of more substantive venues. This book seeks to evaluate whether these activities have improved the level of campaign discourse and conduct in US House and Senate campaigns and argues that while individual reform efforts have achieved some of their stated objectives, the overall effect of these reform efforts has been disappointing |
Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015) |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xiv, 155 pages) |
ISBN: | 9780511611209 |
DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511611209 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV043918747 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 161202s2007 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780511611209 |c Online |9 978-0-511-61120-9 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511611209 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511611209 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)967396454 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043918747 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 324.70973 |2 22 | |
100 | 1 | |a Maisel, Louis Sandy |d 1945- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluating campaign quality |b can the electoral process be improved? |c L. Sandy Maisel, Darrell M. West, Brett M. Clifton |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2007 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (xiv, 155 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Communication, society and politics | |
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015) | ||
505 | 8 | |a Preface -- Campaign reformers: optimists, skeptics, and rejectionists -- Dissemination of campaign practices -- Impact on campaign conduct -- Impact on campaign discourse -- Impact on public perceptions -- Improving the system -- Appendices: A. Data and methodology -- B. Public opinion survey -- C. Consultant survey -- Focus group protocol | |
520 | |a For a number of years, voters and academic observers have been dissatisfied with a number of elements of American campaigns. Contemporary races are seen as too negative, too superficial, and too unfair or misleading. Based on these complaints, a variety of reform organizations have targeted millions of dollars to improve the situation. Through their efforts and those within the academic community, a wide range of reform initiatives have been undertaken, such as voluntary codes of conduct, industry self-regulation, certificate programs, tougher ethics rules for consultants, and the encouragement of more substantive venues. This book seeks to evaluate whether these activities have improved the level of campaign discourse and conduct in US House and Senate campaigns and argues that while individual reform efforts have achieved some of their stated objectives, the overall effect of these reform efforts has been disappointing | ||
650 | 4 | |a Political campaigns / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Elections / United States | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Ethik |0 (DE-588)4129503-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wahlkampf |0 (DE-588)4064292-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Wahlkampf |0 (DE-588)4064292-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Politische Ethik |0 (DE-588)4129503-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a West, Darrell M. |d 1954- |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Clifton, Brett M. |d 1972- |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-70082-5 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-87729-9 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611209 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029327828 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611209 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611209 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804176837435195392 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Maisel, Louis Sandy 1945- |
author_facet | Maisel, Louis Sandy 1945- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Maisel, Louis Sandy 1945- |
author_variant | l s m ls lsm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV043918747 |
collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
contents | Preface -- Campaign reformers: optimists, skeptics, and rejectionists -- Dissemination of campaign practices -- Impact on campaign conduct -- Impact on campaign discourse -- Impact on public perceptions -- Improving the system -- Appendices: A. Data and methodology -- B. Public opinion survey -- C. Consultant survey -- Focus group protocol |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511611209 (OCoLC)967396454 (DE-599)BVBBV043918747 |
dewey-full | 324.70973 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 324 - The political process |
dewey-raw | 324.70973 |
dewey-search | 324.70973 |
dewey-sort | 3324.70973 |
dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
discipline | Politologie |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511611209 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03553nmm a2200565zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043918747</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2007 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511611209</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-61120-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511611209</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511611209</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967396454</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043918747</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">324.70973</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maisel, Louis Sandy</subfield><subfield code="d">1945-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating campaign quality</subfield><subfield code="b">can the electoral process be improved?</subfield><subfield code="c">L. Sandy Maisel, Darrell M. West, Brett M. Clifton</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xiv, 155 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Communication, society and politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Preface -- Campaign reformers: optimists, skeptics, and rejectionists -- Dissemination of campaign practices -- Impact on campaign conduct -- Impact on campaign discourse -- Impact on public perceptions -- Improving the system -- Appendices: A. Data and methodology -- B. Public opinion survey -- C. Consultant survey -- Focus group protocol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For a number of years, voters and academic observers have been dissatisfied with a number of elements of American campaigns. Contemporary races are seen as too negative, too superficial, and too unfair or misleading. Based on these complaints, a variety of reform organizations have targeted millions of dollars to improve the situation. Through their efforts and those within the academic community, a wide range of reform initiatives have been undertaken, such as voluntary codes of conduct, industry self-regulation, certificate programs, tougher ethics rules for consultants, and the encouragement of more substantive venues. This book seeks to evaluate whether these activities have improved the level of campaign discourse and conduct in US House and Senate campaigns and argues that while individual reform efforts have achieved some of their stated objectives, the overall effect of these reform efforts has been disappointing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political campaigns / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Elections / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129503-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wahlkampf</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4064292-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wahlkampf</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4064292-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Politische Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129503-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">West, Darrell M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1954-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clifton, Brett M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1972-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-70082-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-87729-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611209</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029327828</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611209</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611209</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV043918747 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:32Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780511611209 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029327828 |
oclc_num | 967396454 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
physical | 1 online resource (xiv, 155 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
publishDate | 2007 |
publishDateSearch | 2007 |
publishDateSort | 2007 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Communication, society and politics |
spelling | Maisel, Louis Sandy 1945- Verfasser aut Evaluating campaign quality can the electoral process be improved? L. Sandy Maisel, Darrell M. West, Brett M. Clifton Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2007 1 online resource (xiv, 155 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Communication, society and politics Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015) Preface -- Campaign reformers: optimists, skeptics, and rejectionists -- Dissemination of campaign practices -- Impact on campaign conduct -- Impact on campaign discourse -- Impact on public perceptions -- Improving the system -- Appendices: A. Data and methodology -- B. Public opinion survey -- C. Consultant survey -- Focus group protocol For a number of years, voters and academic observers have been dissatisfied with a number of elements of American campaigns. Contemporary races are seen as too negative, too superficial, and too unfair or misleading. Based on these complaints, a variety of reform organizations have targeted millions of dollars to improve the situation. Through their efforts and those within the academic community, a wide range of reform initiatives have been undertaken, such as voluntary codes of conduct, industry self-regulation, certificate programs, tougher ethics rules for consultants, and the encouragement of more substantive venues. This book seeks to evaluate whether these activities have improved the level of campaign discourse and conduct in US House and Senate campaigns and argues that while individual reform efforts have achieved some of their stated objectives, the overall effect of these reform efforts has been disappointing Political campaigns / United States Elections / United States Politische Ethik (DE-588)4129503-1 gnd rswk-swf Wahlkampf (DE-588)4064292-6 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Wahlkampf (DE-588)4064292-6 s Politische Ethik (DE-588)4129503-1 s 1\p DE-604 West, Darrell M. 1954- Sonstige oth Clifton, Brett M. 1972- Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-70082-5 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-87729-9 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611209 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Maisel, Louis Sandy 1945- Evaluating campaign quality can the electoral process be improved? Preface -- Campaign reformers: optimists, skeptics, and rejectionists -- Dissemination of campaign practices -- Impact on campaign conduct -- Impact on campaign discourse -- Impact on public perceptions -- Improving the system -- Appendices: A. Data and methodology -- B. Public opinion survey -- C. Consultant survey -- Focus group protocol Political campaigns / United States Elections / United States Politische Ethik (DE-588)4129503-1 gnd Wahlkampf (DE-588)4064292-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4129503-1 (DE-588)4064292-6 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Evaluating campaign quality can the electoral process be improved? |
title_auth | Evaluating campaign quality can the electoral process be improved? |
title_exact_search | Evaluating campaign quality can the electoral process be improved? |
title_full | Evaluating campaign quality can the electoral process be improved? L. Sandy Maisel, Darrell M. West, Brett M. Clifton |
title_fullStr | Evaluating campaign quality can the electoral process be improved? L. Sandy Maisel, Darrell M. West, Brett M. Clifton |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating campaign quality can the electoral process be improved? L. Sandy Maisel, Darrell M. West, Brett M. Clifton |
title_short | Evaluating campaign quality |
title_sort | evaluating campaign quality can the electoral process be improved |
title_sub | can the electoral process be improved? |
topic | Political campaigns / United States Elections / United States Politische Ethik (DE-588)4129503-1 gnd Wahlkampf (DE-588)4064292-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Political campaigns / United States Elections / United States Politische Ethik Wahlkampf USA |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maisellouissandy evaluatingcampaignqualitycantheelectoralprocessbeimproved AT westdarrellm evaluatingcampaignqualitycantheelectoralprocessbeimproved AT cliftonbrettm evaluatingcampaignqualitycantheelectoralprocessbeimproved |