2013 federal sequestration: analyses of planning, implementation and effects
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York
Nova Publishers
[2014]
|
| Series: | Economic issues, problems and perspectives series
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | FAW01 FAW02 FLA01 |
| Item Description: | Includes index. - Title from PDF title page (viewed on Sept. 26, 2014) |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource |
| ISBN: | 9781633218000 1633218007 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043782885 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160920s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781633218000 |9 978-1-63321-800-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 1633218007 |9 1-63321-800-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-4-EBA)ocn891388154 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)891388154 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043782885 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 336/.012 |2 23 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a 2013 federal sequestration |b analyses of planning, implementation and effects |c Hailie Fox, editor |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York |b Nova Publishers |c [2014] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Economic issues, problems and perspectives series | |
| 500 | |a Includes index. - Title from PDF title page (viewed on Sept. 26, 2014) | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a On March 1, 2013, pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, the President ordered an across-the-board cancellation of budgetary resources, known as sequestration, to achieve 85.3 billion in reductions across federal government accounts. Under current law, a sequestration of direct spending will occur through fiscal year 2024 and another sequestration of discretionary appropriations could occur in any fiscal year through 2021. This book examines the effects of fiscal year 2013 sequestration on agency operations, performance, or services to the public; how agenci | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; AGENCIES' ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO SEQUESTRATION RESULTED IN A RANGE OF IMMEDIATE AND LONGER-TERM EFFECTS | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Most agencies began formal planning for sequestration in 2012 while continued uncertainty delayed decisions regarding resource allocationagencies used funding flexibilities and congress took actions to mitigate some effects on core mission while still achieving sequestration reductions; conclusion; recommendations for executive action; agency comments and our evaluation; overview of sequestration at 23 federal agencies; u.s. department of agriculture; department of commerce; agency comments; department of defense; department of education; department of energy | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Department of health and human servicesdepartment of homeland security; department of housing and urban development; u.s. department of the interior; department of justice; department of labor; department of state and u.s. agency for international development operations and foreign assistance; department of transportation; department of the treasury; u.s. environmental protection agency; general services administration; national aeronautics and space administration; national science foundation; nuclear regulatory commission; office of personnel management; small business administration | |
| 505 | 8 | |a SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONAPPENDIX I. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY; APPENDIX II. GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS; Chapter 2: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: SELECTED FEDERAL AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING SHORT-TERM ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; SEQUESTRATION REDUCED SELECTED FEDERAL COMPONENTS' SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC AND INCREASED SOME PARTNERS' AND RECIPIENTS' RELIANCE ON OTHER FUNDING SOURCES | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Federal components' sequestration planning and implementation efforts varied and were hindered by uncertainty and other challengesconcluding observations; agency comments and our evaluation; appendix i. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at u.s. customs and border protection; appendix ii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the centers for medicare & medicaid services; appendix iii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of elementary and secondary education; appendix iv. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of public and indian housing; appendix v. objectives, scope, and methodology | |
| 648 | 7 | |a 2013 |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Public Finance |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Expenditures, Public |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Government spending policy / Economic aspects |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sequestration (Public finance) |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Expenditures, Public | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Government spending policy / Economic aspects / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Government spending policy / Economic aspects | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sequestration (Public finance) / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sequestration (Public finance) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a United States / Appropriations and expenditures, 2013 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Wirtschaft | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sequestration (Public finance) |z United States |a Government spending policy |x Economic aspects |z United States | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fox, Hailie |4 edt | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Fox, Hailie |t 2013 Federal Sequestration : Analyses of Planning, Implementation and Effects |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029193945 | ||
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=851316 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=851316 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=851316 |l FLA01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FLA_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804176614483820544 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Fox, Hailie |
| author2_role | edt |
| author2_variant | h f hf |
| author_facet | Fox, Hailie |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043782885 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | On March 1, 2013, pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, the President ordered an across-the-board cancellation of budgetary resources, known as sequestration, to achieve 85.3 billion in reductions across federal government accounts. Under current law, a sequestration of direct spending will occur through fiscal year 2024 and another sequestration of discretionary appropriations could occur in any fiscal year through 2021. This book examines the effects of fiscal year 2013 sequestration on agency operations, performance, or services to the public; how agenci 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; AGENCIES' ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO SEQUESTRATION RESULTED IN A RANGE OF IMMEDIATE AND LONGER-TERM EFFECTS Most agencies began formal planning for sequestration in 2012 while continued uncertainty delayed decisions regarding resource allocationagencies used funding flexibilities and congress took actions to mitigate some effects on core mission while still achieving sequestration reductions; conclusion; recommendations for executive action; agency comments and our evaluation; overview of sequestration at 23 federal agencies; u.s. department of agriculture; department of commerce; agency comments; department of defense; department of education; department of energy Department of health and human servicesdepartment of homeland security; department of housing and urban development; u.s. department of the interior; department of justice; department of labor; department of state and u.s. agency for international development operations and foreign assistance; department of transportation; department of the treasury; u.s. environmental protection agency; general services administration; national aeronautics and space administration; national science foundation; nuclear regulatory commission; office of personnel management; small business administration SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONAPPENDIX I. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY; APPENDIX II. GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS; Chapter 2: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: SELECTED FEDERAL AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING SHORT-TERM ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; SEQUESTRATION REDUCED SELECTED FEDERAL COMPONENTS' SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC AND INCREASED SOME PARTNERS' AND RECIPIENTS' RELIANCE ON OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Federal components' sequestration planning and implementation efforts varied and were hindered by uncertainty and other challengesconcluding observations; agency comments and our evaluation; appendix i. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at u.s. customs and border protection; appendix ii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the centers for medicare & medicaid services; appendix iii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of elementary and secondary education; appendix iv. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of public and indian housing; appendix v. objectives, scope, and methodology |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-4-EBA)ocn891388154 (OCoLC)891388154 (DE-599)BVBBV043782885 |
| dewey-full | 336/.012 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 336 - Public finance |
| dewey-raw | 336/.012 |
| dewey-search | 336/.012 |
| dewey-sort | 3336 212 |
| dewey-tens | 330 - Economics |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| era | 2013 fast |
| era_facet | 2013 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05935nmm a2200625zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043782885</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160920s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781633218000</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-63321-800-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1633218007</subfield><subfield code="9">1-63321-800-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-4-EBA)ocn891388154</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)891388154</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043782885</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">336/.012</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">2013 federal sequestration</subfield><subfield code="b">analyses of planning, implementation and effects</subfield><subfield code="c">Hailie Fox, editor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Nova Publishers</subfield><subfield code="c">[2014]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Economic issues, problems and perspectives series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes index. - Title from PDF title page (viewed on Sept. 26, 2014)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">On March 1, 2013, pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, the President ordered an across-the-board cancellation of budgetary resources, known as sequestration, to achieve 85.3 billion in reductions across federal government accounts. Under current law, a sequestration of direct spending will occur through fiscal year 2024 and another sequestration of discretionary appropriations could occur in any fiscal year through 2021. This book examines the effects of fiscal year 2013 sequestration on agency operations, performance, or services to the public; how agenci</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; AGENCIES' ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO SEQUESTRATION RESULTED IN A RANGE OF IMMEDIATE AND LONGER-TERM EFFECTS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Most agencies began formal planning for sequestration in 2012 while continued uncertainty delayed decisions regarding resource allocationagencies used funding flexibilities and congress took actions to mitigate some effects on core mission while still achieving sequestration reductions; conclusion; recommendations for executive action; agency comments and our evaluation; overview of sequestration at 23 federal agencies; u.s. department of agriculture; department of commerce; agency comments; department of defense; department of education; department of energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Department of health and human servicesdepartment of homeland security; department of housing and urban development; u.s. department of the interior; department of justice; department of labor; department of state and u.s. agency for international development operations and foreign assistance; department of transportation; department of the treasury; u.s. environmental protection agency; general services administration; national aeronautics and space administration; national science foundation; nuclear regulatory commission; office of personnel management; small business administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONAPPENDIX I. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY; APPENDIX II. GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS; Chapter 2: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: SELECTED FEDERAL AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING SHORT-TERM ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; SEQUESTRATION REDUCED SELECTED FEDERAL COMPONENTS' SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC AND INCREASED SOME PARTNERS' AND RECIPIENTS' RELIANCE ON OTHER FUNDING SOURCES</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Federal components' sequestration planning and implementation efforts varied and were hindered by uncertainty and other challengesconcluding observations; agency comments and our evaluation; appendix i. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at u.s. customs and border protection; appendix ii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the centers for medicare & medicaid services; appendix iii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of elementary and secondary education; appendix iv. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of public and indian housing; appendix v. objectives, scope, and methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">2013</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Public Finance</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Expenditures, Public</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Government spending policy / Economic aspects</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sequestration (Public finance)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Expenditures, Public</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government spending policy / Economic aspects / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government spending policy / Economic aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sequestration (Public finance) / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sequestration (Public finance)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Appropriations and expenditures, 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wirtschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sequestration (Public finance)</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="a">Government spending policy</subfield><subfield code="x">Economic aspects</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fox, Hailie</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Fox, Hailie</subfield><subfield code="t">2013 Federal Sequestration : Analyses of Planning, Implementation and Effects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029193945</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=851316</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=851316</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=851316</subfield><subfield code="l">FLA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV043782885 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:34:59Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781633218000 1633218007 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029193945 |
| oclc_num | 891388154 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA ZDB-4-EBA FLA_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Nova Publishers |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Economic issues, problems and perspectives series |
| spelling | 2013 federal sequestration analyses of planning, implementation and effects Hailie Fox, editor New York Nova Publishers [2014] © 2014 1 online resource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Economic issues, problems and perspectives series Includes index. - Title from PDF title page (viewed on Sept. 26, 2014) On March 1, 2013, pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, the President ordered an across-the-board cancellation of budgetary resources, known as sequestration, to achieve 85.3 billion in reductions across federal government accounts. Under current law, a sequestration of direct spending will occur through fiscal year 2024 and another sequestration of discretionary appropriations could occur in any fiscal year through 2021. This book examines the effects of fiscal year 2013 sequestration on agency operations, performance, or services to the public; how agenci 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; AGENCIES' ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO SEQUESTRATION RESULTED IN A RANGE OF IMMEDIATE AND LONGER-TERM EFFECTS Most agencies began formal planning for sequestration in 2012 while continued uncertainty delayed decisions regarding resource allocationagencies used funding flexibilities and congress took actions to mitigate some effects on core mission while still achieving sequestration reductions; conclusion; recommendations for executive action; agency comments and our evaluation; overview of sequestration at 23 federal agencies; u.s. department of agriculture; department of commerce; agency comments; department of defense; department of education; department of energy Department of health and human servicesdepartment of homeland security; department of housing and urban development; u.s. department of the interior; department of justice; department of labor; department of state and u.s. agency for international development operations and foreign assistance; department of transportation; department of the treasury; u.s. environmental protection agency; general services administration; national aeronautics and space administration; national science foundation; nuclear regulatory commission; office of personnel management; small business administration SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONAPPENDIX I. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY; APPENDIX II. GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS; Chapter 2: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: SELECTED FEDERAL AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING SHORT-TERM ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; SEQUESTRATION REDUCED SELECTED FEDERAL COMPONENTS' SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC AND INCREASED SOME PARTNERS' AND RECIPIENTS' RELIANCE ON OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Federal components' sequestration planning and implementation efforts varied and were hindered by uncertainty and other challengesconcluding observations; agency comments and our evaluation; appendix i. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at u.s. customs and border protection; appendix ii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the centers for medicare & medicaid services; appendix iii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of elementary and secondary education; appendix iv. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of public and indian housing; appendix v. objectives, scope, and methodology 2013 fast BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Public Finance bisacsh Expenditures, Public fast Government spending policy / Economic aspects fast Sequestration (Public finance) fast Expenditures, Public Government spending policy / Economic aspects / United States Government spending policy / Economic aspects Sequestration (Public finance) / United States Sequestration (Public finance) United States / Appropriations and expenditures, 2013 Wirtschaft Sequestration (Public finance) United States Government spending policy Economic aspects United States USA Fox, Hailie edt Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Fox, Hailie 2013 Federal Sequestration : Analyses of Planning, Implementation and Effects |
| spellingShingle | 2013 federal sequestration analyses of planning, implementation and effects On March 1, 2013, pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, the President ordered an across-the-board cancellation of budgetary resources, known as sequestration, to achieve 85.3 billion in reductions across federal government accounts. Under current law, a sequestration of direct spending will occur through fiscal year 2024 and another sequestration of discretionary appropriations could occur in any fiscal year through 2021. This book examines the effects of fiscal year 2013 sequestration on agency operations, performance, or services to the public; how agenci 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; AGENCIES' ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO SEQUESTRATION RESULTED IN A RANGE OF IMMEDIATE AND LONGER-TERM EFFECTS Most agencies began formal planning for sequestration in 2012 while continued uncertainty delayed decisions regarding resource allocationagencies used funding flexibilities and congress took actions to mitigate some effects on core mission while still achieving sequestration reductions; conclusion; recommendations for executive action; agency comments and our evaluation; overview of sequestration at 23 federal agencies; u.s. department of agriculture; department of commerce; agency comments; department of defense; department of education; department of energy Department of health and human servicesdepartment of homeland security; department of housing and urban development; u.s. department of the interior; department of justice; department of labor; department of state and u.s. agency for international development operations and foreign assistance; department of transportation; department of the treasury; u.s. environmental protection agency; general services administration; national aeronautics and space administration; national science foundation; nuclear regulatory commission; office of personnel management; small business administration SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONAPPENDIX I. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY; APPENDIX II. GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS; Chapter 2: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: SELECTED FEDERAL AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING SHORT-TERM ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; SEQUESTRATION REDUCED SELECTED FEDERAL COMPONENTS' SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC AND INCREASED SOME PARTNERS' AND RECIPIENTS' RELIANCE ON OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Federal components' sequestration planning and implementation efforts varied and were hindered by uncertainty and other challengesconcluding observations; agency comments and our evaluation; appendix i. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at u.s. customs and border protection; appendix ii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the centers for medicare & medicaid services; appendix iii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of elementary and secondary education; appendix iv. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of public and indian housing; appendix v. objectives, scope, and methodology BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Public Finance bisacsh Expenditures, Public fast Government spending policy / Economic aspects fast Sequestration (Public finance) fast Expenditures, Public Government spending policy / Economic aspects / United States Government spending policy / Economic aspects Sequestration (Public finance) / United States Sequestration (Public finance) United States / Appropriations and expenditures, 2013 Wirtschaft Sequestration (Public finance) United States Government spending policy Economic aspects United States |
| title | 2013 federal sequestration analyses of planning, implementation and effects |
| title_auth | 2013 federal sequestration analyses of planning, implementation and effects |
| title_exact_search | 2013 federal sequestration analyses of planning, implementation and effects |
| title_full | 2013 federal sequestration analyses of planning, implementation and effects Hailie Fox, editor |
| title_fullStr | 2013 federal sequestration analyses of planning, implementation and effects Hailie Fox, editor |
| title_full_unstemmed | 2013 federal sequestration analyses of planning, implementation and effects Hailie Fox, editor |
| title_short | 2013 federal sequestration |
| title_sort | 2013 federal sequestration analyses of planning implementation and effects |
| title_sub | analyses of planning, implementation and effects |
| topic | BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Public Finance bisacsh Expenditures, Public fast Government spending policy / Economic aspects fast Sequestration (Public finance) fast Expenditures, Public Government spending policy / Economic aspects / United States Government spending policy / Economic aspects Sequestration (Public finance) / United States Sequestration (Public finance) United States / Appropriations and expenditures, 2013 Wirtschaft Sequestration (Public finance) United States Government spending policy Economic aspects United States |
| topic_facet | BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Public Finance Expenditures, Public Government spending policy / Economic aspects Sequestration (Public finance) Government spending policy / Economic aspects / United States Sequestration (Public finance) / United States United States / Appropriations and expenditures, 2013 Wirtschaft Sequestration (Public finance) United States Government spending policy Economic aspects United States USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT foxhailie 2013federalsequestrationanalysesofplanningimplementationandeffects |