Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards: summary of meetings
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C.
National Academies Press
2006
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references (p. 21) In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., laid out a new test for federal trial judges to use when determining the admissibility of expert testimony. In Daubert, the Court ruled that judges should act as gatekeepers, assessing the reliability of the scientific methodology and reasoning that supports expert testimony. The resulting judicial screening of expert testimony has been particularly consequential. While the Supreme Court sought to bring better science into the courtroom, questions remain about whether the lower courts' application of Daubert accords with scientific practices. This report summarizes discussions held by an ad hoc committee of the The National Academies to consider the impact of Daubert and subsequent Supreme Court opinions and to identify questions for future study |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 35 p.) |
| ISBN: | 0309102480 0309662494 1280567333 9780309102483 9780309662499 9781280567339 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043072197 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151126s2006 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0309102480 |9 0-309-10248-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 0309662494 |c electronic bk. |9 0-309-66249-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 1280567333 |9 1-280-56733-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309102483 |9 978-0-309-10248-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309662499 |c electronic bk. |9 978-0-309-66249-9 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781280567339 |9 978-1-280-56733-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)567897416 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043072197 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.73/67 |2 22 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Hanna, Kathi E. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards |b summary of meetings |c Kathi E. Hanna and Anne-Marie Mazza, rapporteurs |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C. |b National Academies Press |c 2006 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 35 p.) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (p. 21) | ||
| 500 | |a In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., laid out a new test for federal trial judges to use when determining the admissibility of expert testimony. In Daubert, the Court ruled that judges should act as gatekeepers, assessing the reliability of the scientific methodology and reasoning that supports expert testimony. The resulting judicial screening of expert testimony has been particularly consequential. While the Supreme Court sought to bring better science into the courtroom, questions remain about whether the lower courts' application of Daubert accords with scientific practices. This report summarizes discussions held by an ad hoc committee of the The National Academies to consider the impact of Daubert and subsequent Supreme Court opinions and to identify questions for future study | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Legal Services |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Civil Procedure |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Admissible evidence |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Evidence, Expert |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evidence, Expert |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Admissible evidence |z United States | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mazza, Anne-Marie |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 710 | 2 | |a National Research Council (U.S.) |b Committee on Daubert Standards |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=170125 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028496389 | ||
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=170125 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=170125 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175456549732352 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Hanna, Kathi E. |
| author_facet | Hanna, Kathi E. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Hanna, Kathi E. |
| author_variant | k e h ke keh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043072197 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)567897416 (DE-599)BVBBV043072197 |
| dewey-full | 347.73/67 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.73/67 |
| dewey-search | 347.73/67 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.73 267 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03010nmm a2200517zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043072197</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151126s2006 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309102480</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-10248-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309662494</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-66249-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1280567333</subfield><subfield code="9">1-280-56733-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309102483</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-10248-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309662499</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-66249-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781280567339</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-280-56733-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)567897416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043072197</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/67</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hanna, Kathi E.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards</subfield><subfield code="b">summary of meetings</subfield><subfield code="c">Kathi E. Hanna and Anne-Marie Mazza, rapporteurs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Academies Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (ix, 35 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. 21)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., laid out a new test for federal trial judges to use when determining the admissibility of expert testimony. In Daubert, the Court ruled that judges should act as gatekeepers, assessing the reliability of the scientific methodology and reasoning that supports expert testimony. The resulting judicial screening of expert testimony has been particularly consequential. While the Supreme Court sought to bring better science into the courtroom, questions remain about whether the lower courts' application of Daubert accords with scientific practices. This report summarizes discussions held by an ad hoc committee of the The National Academies to consider the impact of Daubert and subsequent Supreme Court opinions and to identify questions for future study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Legal Services</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Civil Procedure</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Admissible evidence</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Expert</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Expert</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Admissible evidence</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mazza, Anne-Marie</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Research Council (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="b">Committee on Daubert Standards</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=170125</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028496389</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=170125</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=170125</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV043072197 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:16:35Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0309102480 0309662494 1280567333 9780309102483 9780309662499 9781280567339 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028496389 |
| oclc_num | 567897416 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 35 p.) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateSearch | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | National Academies Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Hanna, Kathi E. Verfasser aut Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards summary of meetings Kathi E. Hanna and Anne-Marie Mazza, rapporteurs Washington, D.C. National Academies Press 2006 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 35 p.) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references (p. 21) In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., laid out a new test for federal trial judges to use when determining the admissibility of expert testimony. In Daubert, the Court ruled that judges should act as gatekeepers, assessing the reliability of the scientific methodology and reasoning that supports expert testimony. The resulting judicial screening of expert testimony has been particularly consequential. While the Supreme Court sought to bring better science into the courtroom, questions remain about whether the lower courts' application of Daubert accords with scientific practices. This report summarizes discussions held by an ad hoc committee of the The National Academies to consider the impact of Daubert and subsequent Supreme Court opinions and to identify questions for future study POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh LAW / Legal Services bisacsh LAW / Civil Procedure bisacsh Admissible evidence fast Evidence, Expert fast Evidence, Expert United States Admissible evidence United States USA Mazza, Anne-Marie Sonstige oth National Research Council (U.S.) Committee on Daubert Standards Sonstige oth http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=170125 Aggregator Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Hanna, Kathi E. Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards summary of meetings POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh LAW / Legal Services bisacsh LAW / Civil Procedure bisacsh Admissible evidence fast Evidence, Expert fast Evidence, Expert United States Admissible evidence United States |
| title | Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards summary of meetings |
| title_auth | Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards summary of meetings |
| title_exact_search | Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards summary of meetings |
| title_full | Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards summary of meetings Kathi E. Hanna and Anne-Marie Mazza, rapporteurs |
| title_fullStr | Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards summary of meetings Kathi E. Hanna and Anne-Marie Mazza, rapporteurs |
| title_full_unstemmed | Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards summary of meetings Kathi E. Hanna and Anne-Marie Mazza, rapporteurs |
| title_short | Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards |
| title_sort | discussion of the committee on daubert standards summary of meetings |
| title_sub | summary of meetings |
| topic | POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh LAW / Legal Services bisacsh LAW / Civil Procedure bisacsh Admissible evidence fast Evidence, Expert fast Evidence, Expert United States Admissible evidence United States |
| topic_facet | POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch LAW / Legal Services LAW / Civil Procedure Admissible evidence Evidence, Expert Evidence, Expert United States Admissible evidence United States USA |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=170125 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hannakathie discussionofthecommitteeondaubertstandardssummaryofmeetings AT mazzaannemarie discussionofthecommitteeondaubertstandardssummaryofmeetings AT nationalresearchcounciluscommitteeondaubertstandards discussionofthecommitteeondaubertstandardssummaryofmeetings |