That eminent tribunal: judicial supremacy and the constitution
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press ©2004
Series:New forum books
Subjects:
Online Access:FAW01
FAW02
Volltext
Item Description:Includes bibliographical references and index
Is the Constitution whatever the winners say it is? / Gerard V. Bradley -- Nationhood and judicial supremacy / Robert F. Nagel -- Casey at the bat--taking another swing at Planned Parenthood v. Casey / Michael Zuckert -- Antijural jurisprudence : the vices of the judges enter a new stage / Hadley Arkes -- Judicial power and the withering of civil society / George W. Liebmann -- The academy, the courts, and the culture of rationalism / Steven D. Smith -- Judicial moral expertise and real-world constraints on judicial moral reasoning / Jack Wade Nowlin -- Toward a more balanced history of the Supreme Court / Michael W. McConnell -- Judicial review and republican government / Jeremy Waldron -- The Casey Five versus the Federalism Five : supreme legislator or prudent umpire? / Keith E. Whittington -- The Rhenquist Court and "conservative judicial activism" / Christopher Wolfe
The role of the United States Supreme Court has been deeply controversial throughout American history. Should the Court undertake the task of guarding a wide variety of controversial and often unenumerated rights? Or should it confine itself to enforcing specific constitutional provisions, leaving other issues (even those of rights) to the democratic process?
Physical Description:1 Online-Ressource (viii, 237 pages)
ISBN:1400826284
9781400826285

There is no print copy available.

Interlibrary loan Place Request Caution: Not in THWS collection! Get full text