Liberal Perfectionism: the Reasons that Goodness Gives
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin
De Gruyter
2014
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Practical philosophy
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Print version record. - 5.5.1 In favour of the Interest Theory |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (232 pages) |
| ISBN: | 1306430240 3110335263 3110336952 3110336960 9781306430241 9783110335262 9783110336955 9783110336962 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043035245 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151120s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 1306430240 |9 1-306-43024-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 3110335263 |9 3-11-033526-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 3110336952 |9 3-11-033695-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 3110336960 |9 3-11-033696-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781306430241 |9 978-1-306-43024-1 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110335262 |9 978-3-11-033526-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110336955 |9 978-3-11-033695-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110336962 |9 978-3-11-033696-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)895730916 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043035245 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 320.513 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Couto, Alexandra |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Liberal Perfectionism |b the Reasons that Goodness Gives |
| 264 | 1 | |a Berlin |b De Gruyter |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (232 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Practical philosophy | |
| 500 | |a Print version record. - 5.5.1 In favour of the Interest Theory | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a 0 Introduction; 0.1 The Rejection of Neutrality; 0.2 Why the Rejection of Neutrality is not Enough; 0.3 Basic Features and Definitions of Perfectionism; 0.4 Re-conceptualisation of the Differences between Neutralist and Perfectionist Liberals; 0.5 Summary of the Argument of the Book; 1 Perfectionism: Some Basic Distinctions; 1.1 Defining Ethical Perfectionism, Prudential Perfectionism and Political Perfectionism; 1.2 Why Political Perfectionism Requires an Account of Ethical Perfectionism; 1.3 Prudential Perfectionism and Objective Goods | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1.4 Arguments for the Objective List Conception of Well-Being1.5 The Step from Prudential Perfectionism to Ethical Perfectionism; 1.6 The Step from Ethical Perfectionism to Political Perfectionism; 1.7 Conclusion; 2 Perfectionist Goods; 2.1 Basic Terminology; 2.2 What Should we include in our List of Objective Goods?; 2.2.1 Too Sparse; 2.2.2 Refer to goods that are not fundamental; 2.2.3 Contain too many goods; 2.2.4 A Plausible List of Objective Goods; 2.3 Realizing Goods vs. Opportunities; 2.4 Agency and Good; 2.5 Bringing Back Perspective for a Perfectionist Renaissance | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 2.5.1 There is Something about Perspective2.5.2 Endorsement Distinctions; 2.5.3 Well-being; 2.6 Does Perfectionism require a Unifying Account of the Good?; 2.7 Could Perfectionism be based on Cultural Norms or on an Overlapping Consensus?; 2.8 Is the Lack of Unifying Account Damaging for Political Perfectionism?; 2.9 Conclusion; 3 Ethical Perfectionism: Distinctions and Objections; 3.1 Ethical Perfectionism as a Family of Theories; 3.1.1 Exclusive vs. Non-exclusive Perfectionism; 3.1.2 Pluralist vs. Monist Perfectionism; 3.1.3 Broad vs. Narrow Perfectionism | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3.1.4 Satisficing vs. Maximising Perfectionism3.1.5 Absolute vs. Relative Perfectionism; 3.2 Consequentialist, Virtue Ethics and Deontological Perfectionism; 3.3 Is Perfectionism too Self-indulgent?; 3.4 Praise and Blame; 3.5 Perfectionism and Positive Value; 3.6 Conclusion; 4 The Reasons that Goodness Gives; 4.1 Prima Facie Arguments; 4.2 Well-Being and the Function of the State: The Crude Argument; 4.3 The Service and Well-Being Argument; 4.4 Is the Humanistic Principle necessary for the Service and Well-Being Argument?; 4.5 An Objection to the Social Forms Thesis | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 4.6 The Service and Practical Reason Argument: The Explicit Version4.7 An Objection to the Service and Practical Reason Argument: Agentneutral vs Agent-relative Reasons; 4.7.1 The Objection; 4.7.2 Agent-relative Reasons in our Lives; 4.8 The Revised Service and Practical Reason Argument; 4.9 A Meta-ethical Objection; 4.10 An Objection to the Service Conception of Authority; 4.11 Conclusion; 5 The Consistency Argument; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Charles Taylor's Argument; 5.3 Vinit Haksar's Argument; 5.4 The Consistency Argument; 5.5 The Protection of Individual Rights and Interests | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Literature on political perfectionism has often mainly focused on dealing with objections. This book highlights the intuitive appeal of liberal perfectionism. Many objections to perfectionism are shown to fail to reach their target once appropriate distinctions are drawn and a plausible form of liberal perfectionism is endorsed. More surprisingly, Couto suggests that perfectionism might be compatible with the concept of social justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liberalism / Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Perfection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social justice | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Liberalism / Philosophy |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Perfection |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Social justice |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Essays |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / National |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Reference |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liberalism |x Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Perfection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social justice | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gutes Leben |0 (DE-588)4494281-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Soziale Gerechtigkeit |0 (DE-588)4236433-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Perfektionismus |0 (DE-588)4173736-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Liberalismus |0 (DE-588)4035582-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |8 1\p |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Soziale Gerechtigkeit |0 (DE-588)4236433-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Perfektionismus |0 (DE-588)4173736-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Gutes Leben |0 (DE-588)4494281-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Liberalismus |0 (DE-588)4035582-2 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Soziale Gerechtigkeit |0 (DE-588)4236433-4 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |8 3\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Couto, Alexandra |t Liberal Perfectionism : The Reasons that Goodness Gives |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=699672 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028459895 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 3\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=699672 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=699672 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175394791751680 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Couto, Alexandra |
| author_facet | Couto, Alexandra |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Couto, Alexandra |
| author_variant | a c ac |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043035245 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | 0 Introduction; 0.1 The Rejection of Neutrality; 0.2 Why the Rejection of Neutrality is not Enough; 0.3 Basic Features and Definitions of Perfectionism; 0.4 Re-conceptualisation of the Differences between Neutralist and Perfectionist Liberals; 0.5 Summary of the Argument of the Book; 1 Perfectionism: Some Basic Distinctions; 1.1 Defining Ethical Perfectionism, Prudential Perfectionism and Political Perfectionism; 1.2 Why Political Perfectionism Requires an Account of Ethical Perfectionism; 1.3 Prudential Perfectionism and Objective Goods 1.4 Arguments for the Objective List Conception of Well-Being1.5 The Step from Prudential Perfectionism to Ethical Perfectionism; 1.6 The Step from Ethical Perfectionism to Political Perfectionism; 1.7 Conclusion; 2 Perfectionist Goods; 2.1 Basic Terminology; 2.2 What Should we include in our List of Objective Goods?; 2.2.1 Too Sparse; 2.2.2 Refer to goods that are not fundamental; 2.2.3 Contain too many goods; 2.2.4 A Plausible List of Objective Goods; 2.3 Realizing Goods vs. Opportunities; 2.4 Agency and Good; 2.5 Bringing Back Perspective for a Perfectionist Renaissance 2.5.1 There is Something about Perspective2.5.2 Endorsement Distinctions; 2.5.3 Well-being; 2.6 Does Perfectionism require a Unifying Account of the Good?; 2.7 Could Perfectionism be based on Cultural Norms or on an Overlapping Consensus?; 2.8 Is the Lack of Unifying Account Damaging for Political Perfectionism?; 2.9 Conclusion; 3 Ethical Perfectionism: Distinctions and Objections; 3.1 Ethical Perfectionism as a Family of Theories; 3.1.1 Exclusive vs. Non-exclusive Perfectionism; 3.1.2 Pluralist vs. Monist Perfectionism; 3.1.3 Broad vs. Narrow Perfectionism 3.1.4 Satisficing vs. Maximising Perfectionism3.1.5 Absolute vs. Relative Perfectionism; 3.2 Consequentialist, Virtue Ethics and Deontological Perfectionism; 3.3 Is Perfectionism too Self-indulgent?; 3.4 Praise and Blame; 3.5 Perfectionism and Positive Value; 3.6 Conclusion; 4 The Reasons that Goodness Gives; 4.1 Prima Facie Arguments; 4.2 Well-Being and the Function of the State: The Crude Argument; 4.3 The Service and Well-Being Argument; 4.4 Is the Humanistic Principle necessary for the Service and Well-Being Argument?; 4.5 An Objection to the Social Forms Thesis 4.6 The Service and Practical Reason Argument: The Explicit Version4.7 An Objection to the Service and Practical Reason Argument: Agentneutral vs Agent-relative Reasons; 4.7.1 The Objection; 4.7.2 Agent-relative Reasons in our Lives; 4.8 The Revised Service and Practical Reason Argument; 4.9 A Meta-ethical Objection; 4.10 An Objection to the Service Conception of Authority; 4.11 Conclusion; 5 The Consistency Argument; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Charles Taylor's Argument; 5.3 Vinit Haksar's Argument; 5.4 The Consistency Argument; 5.5 The Protection of Individual Rights and Interests Literature on political perfectionism has often mainly focused on dealing with objections. This book highlights the intuitive appeal of liberal perfectionism. Many objections to perfectionism are shown to fail to reach their target once appropriate distinctions are drawn and a plausible form of liberal perfectionism is endorsed. More surprisingly, Couto suggests that perfectionism might be compatible with the concept of social justice |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)895730916 (DE-599)BVBBV043035245 |
| dewey-full | 320.513 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
| dewey-raw | 320.513 |
| dewey-search | 320.513 |
| dewey-sort | 3320.513 |
| dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
| discipline | Politologie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06781nmm a2200877zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043035245</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151120s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1306430240</subfield><subfield code="9">1-306-43024-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3110335263</subfield><subfield code="9">3-11-033526-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3110336952</subfield><subfield code="9">3-11-033695-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3110336960</subfield><subfield code="9">3-11-033696-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781306430241</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-306-43024-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110335262</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-033526-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110336955</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-033695-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110336962</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-033696-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)895730916</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043035245</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">320.513</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Couto, Alexandra</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Liberal Perfectionism</subfield><subfield code="b">the Reasons that Goodness Gives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (232 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Practical philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record. - 5.5.1 In favour of the Interest Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0 Introduction; 0.1 The Rejection of Neutrality; 0.2 Why the Rejection of Neutrality is not Enough; 0.3 Basic Features and Definitions of Perfectionism; 0.4 Re-conceptualisation of the Differences between Neutralist and Perfectionist Liberals; 0.5 Summary of the Argument of the Book; 1 Perfectionism: Some Basic Distinctions; 1.1 Defining Ethical Perfectionism, Prudential Perfectionism and Political Perfectionism; 1.2 Why Political Perfectionism Requires an Account of Ethical Perfectionism; 1.3 Prudential Perfectionism and Objective Goods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1.4 Arguments for the Objective List Conception of Well-Being1.5 The Step from Prudential Perfectionism to Ethical Perfectionism; 1.6 The Step from Ethical Perfectionism to Political Perfectionism; 1.7 Conclusion; 2 Perfectionist Goods; 2.1 Basic Terminology; 2.2 What Should we include in our List of Objective Goods?; 2.2.1 Too Sparse; 2.2.2 Refer to goods that are not fundamental; 2.2.3 Contain too many goods; 2.2.4 A Plausible List of Objective Goods; 2.3 Realizing Goods vs. Opportunities; 2.4 Agency and Good; 2.5 Bringing Back Perspective for a Perfectionist Renaissance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2.5.1 There is Something about Perspective2.5.2 Endorsement Distinctions; 2.5.3 Well-being; 2.6 Does Perfectionism require a Unifying Account of the Good?; 2.7 Could Perfectionism be based on Cultural Norms or on an Overlapping Consensus?; 2.8 Is the Lack of Unifying Account Damaging for Political Perfectionism?; 2.9 Conclusion; 3 Ethical Perfectionism: Distinctions and Objections; 3.1 Ethical Perfectionism as a Family of Theories; 3.1.1 Exclusive vs. Non-exclusive Perfectionism; 3.1.2 Pluralist vs. Monist Perfectionism; 3.1.3 Broad vs. Narrow Perfectionism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.1.4 Satisficing vs. Maximising Perfectionism3.1.5 Absolute vs. Relative Perfectionism; 3.2 Consequentialist, Virtue Ethics and Deontological Perfectionism; 3.3 Is Perfectionism too Self-indulgent?; 3.4 Praise and Blame; 3.5 Perfectionism and Positive Value; 3.6 Conclusion; 4 The Reasons that Goodness Gives; 4.1 Prima Facie Arguments; 4.2 Well-Being and the Function of the State: The Crude Argument; 4.3 The Service and Well-Being Argument; 4.4 Is the Humanistic Principle necessary for the Service and Well-Being Argument?; 4.5 An Objection to the Social Forms Thesis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4.6 The Service and Practical Reason Argument: The Explicit Version4.7 An Objection to the Service and Practical Reason Argument: Agentneutral vs Agent-relative Reasons; 4.7.1 The Objection; 4.7.2 Agent-relative Reasons in our Lives; 4.8 The Revised Service and Practical Reason Argument; 4.9 A Meta-ethical Objection; 4.10 An Objection to the Service Conception of Authority; 4.11 Conclusion; 5 The Consistency Argument; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Charles Taylor's Argument; 5.3 Vinit Haksar's Argument; 5.4 The Consistency Argument; 5.5 The Protection of Individual Rights and Interests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literature on political perfectionism has often mainly focused on dealing with objections. This book highlights the intuitive appeal of liberal perfectionism. Many objections to perfectionism are shown to fail to reach their target once appropriate distinctions are drawn and a plausible form of liberal perfectionism is endorsed. More surprisingly, Couto suggests that perfectionism might be compatible with the concept of social justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liberalism / Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Perfection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Liberalism / Philosophy</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Perfection</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Social justice</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Essays</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / National</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Reference</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liberalism</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Perfection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gutes Leben</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4494281-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Soziale Gerechtigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4236433-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Perfektionismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4173736-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Liberalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035582-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Soziale Gerechtigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4236433-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Perfektionismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4173736-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Gutes Leben</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4494281-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Liberalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035582-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Soziale Gerechtigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4236433-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">3\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Couto, Alexandra</subfield><subfield code="t">Liberal Perfectionism : The Reasons that Goodness Gives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=699672</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028459895</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">3\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=699672</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=699672</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV043035245 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:15:36Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 1306430240 3110335263 3110336952 3110336960 9781306430241 9783110335262 9783110336955 9783110336962 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028459895 |
| oclc_num | 895730916 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 online resource (232 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Practical philosophy |
| spelling | Couto, Alexandra Verfasser aut Liberal Perfectionism the Reasons that Goodness Gives Berlin De Gruyter 2014 1 online resource (232 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Practical philosophy Print version record. - 5.5.1 In favour of the Interest Theory 0 Introduction; 0.1 The Rejection of Neutrality; 0.2 Why the Rejection of Neutrality is not Enough; 0.3 Basic Features and Definitions of Perfectionism; 0.4 Re-conceptualisation of the Differences between Neutralist and Perfectionist Liberals; 0.5 Summary of the Argument of the Book; 1 Perfectionism: Some Basic Distinctions; 1.1 Defining Ethical Perfectionism, Prudential Perfectionism and Political Perfectionism; 1.2 Why Political Perfectionism Requires an Account of Ethical Perfectionism; 1.3 Prudential Perfectionism and Objective Goods 1.4 Arguments for the Objective List Conception of Well-Being1.5 The Step from Prudential Perfectionism to Ethical Perfectionism; 1.6 The Step from Ethical Perfectionism to Political Perfectionism; 1.7 Conclusion; 2 Perfectionist Goods; 2.1 Basic Terminology; 2.2 What Should we include in our List of Objective Goods?; 2.2.1 Too Sparse; 2.2.2 Refer to goods that are not fundamental; 2.2.3 Contain too many goods; 2.2.4 A Plausible List of Objective Goods; 2.3 Realizing Goods vs. Opportunities; 2.4 Agency and Good; 2.5 Bringing Back Perspective for a Perfectionist Renaissance 2.5.1 There is Something about Perspective2.5.2 Endorsement Distinctions; 2.5.3 Well-being; 2.6 Does Perfectionism require a Unifying Account of the Good?; 2.7 Could Perfectionism be based on Cultural Norms or on an Overlapping Consensus?; 2.8 Is the Lack of Unifying Account Damaging for Political Perfectionism?; 2.9 Conclusion; 3 Ethical Perfectionism: Distinctions and Objections; 3.1 Ethical Perfectionism as a Family of Theories; 3.1.1 Exclusive vs. Non-exclusive Perfectionism; 3.1.2 Pluralist vs. Monist Perfectionism; 3.1.3 Broad vs. Narrow Perfectionism 3.1.4 Satisficing vs. Maximising Perfectionism3.1.5 Absolute vs. Relative Perfectionism; 3.2 Consequentialist, Virtue Ethics and Deontological Perfectionism; 3.3 Is Perfectionism too Self-indulgent?; 3.4 Praise and Blame; 3.5 Perfectionism and Positive Value; 3.6 Conclusion; 4 The Reasons that Goodness Gives; 4.1 Prima Facie Arguments; 4.2 Well-Being and the Function of the State: The Crude Argument; 4.3 The Service and Well-Being Argument; 4.4 Is the Humanistic Principle necessary for the Service and Well-Being Argument?; 4.5 An Objection to the Social Forms Thesis 4.6 The Service and Practical Reason Argument: The Explicit Version4.7 An Objection to the Service and Practical Reason Argument: Agentneutral vs Agent-relative Reasons; 4.7.1 The Objection; 4.7.2 Agent-relative Reasons in our Lives; 4.8 The Revised Service and Practical Reason Argument; 4.9 A Meta-ethical Objection; 4.10 An Objection to the Service Conception of Authority; 4.11 Conclusion; 5 The Consistency Argument; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Charles Taylor's Argument; 5.3 Vinit Haksar's Argument; 5.4 The Consistency Argument; 5.5 The Protection of Individual Rights and Interests Literature on political perfectionism has often mainly focused on dealing with objections. This book highlights the intuitive appeal of liberal perfectionism. Many objections to perfectionism are shown to fail to reach their target once appropriate distinctions are drawn and a plausible form of liberal perfectionism is endorsed. More surprisingly, Couto suggests that perfectionism might be compatible with the concept of social justice Liberalism / Philosophy Perfection Social justice Liberalism / Philosophy fast Perfection fast Social justice fast POLITICAL SCIENCE / Essays bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / National bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Reference bisacsh Philosophie Liberalism Philosophy Gutes Leben (DE-588)4494281-3 gnd rswk-swf Soziale Gerechtigkeit (DE-588)4236433-4 gnd rswk-swf Perfektionismus (DE-588)4173736-2 gnd rswk-swf Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd rswk-swf Liberalismus (DE-588)4035582-2 gnd rswk-swf 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Soziale Gerechtigkeit (DE-588)4236433-4 s Perfektionismus (DE-588)4173736-2 s Gutes Leben (DE-588)4494281-3 s 2\p DE-604 Liberalismus (DE-588)4035582-2 s Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 s 3\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Couto, Alexandra Liberal Perfectionism : The Reasons that Goodness Gives http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=699672 Aggregator Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 3\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Couto, Alexandra Liberal Perfectionism the Reasons that Goodness Gives 0 Introduction; 0.1 The Rejection of Neutrality; 0.2 Why the Rejection of Neutrality is not Enough; 0.3 Basic Features and Definitions of Perfectionism; 0.4 Re-conceptualisation of the Differences between Neutralist and Perfectionist Liberals; 0.5 Summary of the Argument of the Book; 1 Perfectionism: Some Basic Distinctions; 1.1 Defining Ethical Perfectionism, Prudential Perfectionism and Political Perfectionism; 1.2 Why Political Perfectionism Requires an Account of Ethical Perfectionism; 1.3 Prudential Perfectionism and Objective Goods 1.4 Arguments for the Objective List Conception of Well-Being1.5 The Step from Prudential Perfectionism to Ethical Perfectionism; 1.6 The Step from Ethical Perfectionism to Political Perfectionism; 1.7 Conclusion; 2 Perfectionist Goods; 2.1 Basic Terminology; 2.2 What Should we include in our List of Objective Goods?; 2.2.1 Too Sparse; 2.2.2 Refer to goods that are not fundamental; 2.2.3 Contain too many goods; 2.2.4 A Plausible List of Objective Goods; 2.3 Realizing Goods vs. Opportunities; 2.4 Agency and Good; 2.5 Bringing Back Perspective for a Perfectionist Renaissance 2.5.1 There is Something about Perspective2.5.2 Endorsement Distinctions; 2.5.3 Well-being; 2.6 Does Perfectionism require a Unifying Account of the Good?; 2.7 Could Perfectionism be based on Cultural Norms or on an Overlapping Consensus?; 2.8 Is the Lack of Unifying Account Damaging for Political Perfectionism?; 2.9 Conclusion; 3 Ethical Perfectionism: Distinctions and Objections; 3.1 Ethical Perfectionism as a Family of Theories; 3.1.1 Exclusive vs. Non-exclusive Perfectionism; 3.1.2 Pluralist vs. Monist Perfectionism; 3.1.3 Broad vs. Narrow Perfectionism 3.1.4 Satisficing vs. Maximising Perfectionism3.1.5 Absolute vs. Relative Perfectionism; 3.2 Consequentialist, Virtue Ethics and Deontological Perfectionism; 3.3 Is Perfectionism too Self-indulgent?; 3.4 Praise and Blame; 3.5 Perfectionism and Positive Value; 3.6 Conclusion; 4 The Reasons that Goodness Gives; 4.1 Prima Facie Arguments; 4.2 Well-Being and the Function of the State: The Crude Argument; 4.3 The Service and Well-Being Argument; 4.4 Is the Humanistic Principle necessary for the Service and Well-Being Argument?; 4.5 An Objection to the Social Forms Thesis 4.6 The Service and Practical Reason Argument: The Explicit Version4.7 An Objection to the Service and Practical Reason Argument: Agentneutral vs Agent-relative Reasons; 4.7.1 The Objection; 4.7.2 Agent-relative Reasons in our Lives; 4.8 The Revised Service and Practical Reason Argument; 4.9 A Meta-ethical Objection; 4.10 An Objection to the Service Conception of Authority; 4.11 Conclusion; 5 The Consistency Argument; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Charles Taylor's Argument; 5.3 Vinit Haksar's Argument; 5.4 The Consistency Argument; 5.5 The Protection of Individual Rights and Interests Literature on political perfectionism has often mainly focused on dealing with objections. This book highlights the intuitive appeal of liberal perfectionism. Many objections to perfectionism are shown to fail to reach their target once appropriate distinctions are drawn and a plausible form of liberal perfectionism is endorsed. More surprisingly, Couto suggests that perfectionism might be compatible with the concept of social justice Liberalism / Philosophy Perfection Social justice Liberalism / Philosophy fast Perfection fast Social justice fast POLITICAL SCIENCE / Essays bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / National bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Reference bisacsh Philosophie Liberalism Philosophy Gutes Leben (DE-588)4494281-3 gnd Soziale Gerechtigkeit (DE-588)4236433-4 gnd Perfektionismus (DE-588)4173736-2 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Liberalismus (DE-588)4035582-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4494281-3 (DE-588)4236433-4 (DE-588)4173736-2 (DE-588)4045791-6 (DE-588)4035582-2 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Liberal Perfectionism the Reasons that Goodness Gives |
| title_auth | Liberal Perfectionism the Reasons that Goodness Gives |
| title_exact_search | Liberal Perfectionism the Reasons that Goodness Gives |
| title_full | Liberal Perfectionism the Reasons that Goodness Gives |
| title_fullStr | Liberal Perfectionism the Reasons that Goodness Gives |
| title_full_unstemmed | Liberal Perfectionism the Reasons that Goodness Gives |
| title_short | Liberal Perfectionism |
| title_sort | liberal perfectionism the reasons that goodness gives |
| title_sub | the Reasons that Goodness Gives |
| topic | Liberalism / Philosophy Perfection Social justice Liberalism / Philosophy fast Perfection fast Social justice fast POLITICAL SCIENCE / Essays bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / National bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Reference bisacsh Philosophie Liberalism Philosophy Gutes Leben (DE-588)4494281-3 gnd Soziale Gerechtigkeit (DE-588)4236433-4 gnd Perfektionismus (DE-588)4173736-2 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Liberalismus (DE-588)4035582-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Liberalism / Philosophy Perfection Social justice POLITICAL SCIENCE / Essays POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / General POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / National POLITICAL SCIENCE / Reference Philosophie Liberalism Philosophy Gutes Leben Soziale Gerechtigkeit Perfektionismus Liberalismus Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=699672 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT coutoalexandra liberalperfectionismthereasonsthatgoodnessgives |