A candid review of a pamphlet entitled A candid reply the whole being a doctrinal controversy between the Hopkintonian and the Universalist. Begun on the part of the Universalist by E. Paine and H. Ballou. And continued on the part of the Hopkintonian by the Rev. Isaac Robinson, A.M. of Stoddard, N.H. And now further continued on the part of the Universalist - Ballou, Hosea (Printed at the Gazette Office, for William Weeks and Benjamin Floyd. W. Weeks--printer, 1810)
"Copy entered according to law, by W. Weeks, printer."--p. 207. - Last page blank. - Shaw & Shoemaker, 16893. - Shaw & Shoemaker, 19406. - The doctrinal controversy commenced in 1808 with the publication of Ballou's A doctrinal controversy between the Hopkintonian and the Universalist (Shaw & Shoemaker 14406), and was continued in 1809 with Robinson's A candid reply to a late publication entitled A doctrinal controversy between the Hopkintonian and Universalist (Shaw & Shoemaker 18525). The present title was advertised as "just published" in the Nov. 27, 1810, issue of the New Hampshire gazette, Portsmouth