Comparative stimulations for developing tort law: compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Wien
Sramek
2015
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Civil law
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Klappentext Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XIII, 273 S. |
| ISBN: | 9783709700600 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV042811546 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20170323 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 150908s2015 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783709700600 |9 978-3-7097-0060-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)921218579 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ434663611 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-384 | ||
| 084 | |a PU 1532 |0 (DE-625)139918: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative stimulations for developing tort law |b compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation |c Helmut Koziol (ed.). Contributors Bjarte Askeland ... |
| 264 | 1 | |a Wien |b Sramek |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a XIII, 273 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Civil law | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Unerlaubte Handlung |0 (DE-588)4061688-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Unerlaubte Handlung |0 (DE-588)4061688-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Koziol, Helmut |d 1940- |0 (DE-588)140928049 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Askeland, Bjarte |d 1965- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1064664288 |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028241039&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028241039&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028241039 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175053252722688 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | This book »Comparative Stimulations for Developing Tort Law« concludes the
project »Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Comparative Perspective«. It joins
forces with the earlier »Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Germanic Perspective«
and »Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Comparative Perspective« to open up to
readers not only the diversity of the legal systems in the European Union and
beyond but also what they have in common.
In this volume the editor presents ideas, won from the comparative law analysis,
for the further development of tort law with reference to the six topics named in
the subtitles: Compensation for Personal Injuries; All-or-Nothing Rule; Liability
of Children and the Notion of Fault; Liability for Agents; Lawful Alternative Con-
duct; Finding of a Violation. The writers representing the seven legal systems in
the study give a response to each of these six topics.
Moreover, the volume contains not only »Comparative Stimulations« and the
»Statements by Country Reporters«, but also »Concluding Remarks« on each
problem area, written by Helmut Koziol on the basis of the opinions and argu-
ments given.
Table of Contents
VII
Introduction ......................................................... V
Topic I
Social Security Systems, Risk-Spreading
and the Compensation of Damage in the Case of Personal Injury
A. Comparative Stimulations (Helmut Kozioł) ..................... 3
1. Overview ................................................. 3
2. Advantages and disadvantages of the European concepts .... 5
3. Ideas for a solution...................................... 7
B. Statements by Country Reporters .............................. 11
1. France (Jean-Sébastien Borghetti) ........................... 11
2. Norway (Bjarte Askeland) .................................... 15
3. Poland (Katarzyna Ludwichowska-Redo) ........................ 19
4. Hungary (Attila Meny hard) .................................. 26
5. England and the Commonwealth (Ken Oliphant).................. 31
6. United States of America (Michael D. Green) ................. 35
7. Japan (Fumihiro Nagano) ..................................... 38
A. Proposal of »comprehensive remedy system« in Japan ... 38
L Criticism of the present tort law
and other remedy systems ........................... 38
II. Structure of »comprehensive remedy system« ...... 39
1. Sources of the fund .......................... 39
2. Payment by the fund .......................... 39
3. Abolishment of the tort law system ........... 39
B. Discussion on this proposal .......................... 40
L Administrative difficulties......................... 40
II. Problem in respect of justice ................... 40
III. Problem of deterrence ............................. 40
C. Comparison to the concept of »social liability insurance«
by Kozioł .............................................. 41
Helmut Koziol fed)· Comparative Stimulations for Developing Tort Law
Table of Contents
I. Distinction between security insurance
and liability insurance ................................. 41
II. Similar problem concerning deterrence effect.......... 41
D. Remarks ...................................................... 42
I. Trade-off between facilitating compensation
and maintaining deterrence effect ....................... 42
II. Desirable reach of liability insurance................ 42
C. Concluding Remarks (Helmut Koziol) ................................ 44
1. Replacing tort law by insurance systems .......................... 44
2. General liability insurance ...................................... 47
Topic II
Flexibility Instead of the All-or-Nothing Rule
A. Comparative Stimulations (Helmut Koziol) ....................... 57
1. General remarks.................................................. 57
2. Method of drafting rules ...................................... 58
3. Clear delineation between legal instruments
and interim forms .......................................... 59
4. Absolutely protected and unprotected interests .................. 60
5. Partial compensation .......................................... 61
B. Statements by Country Reporters ................................ 66
1. France (Jean-Sébastien Borghetti) ............................... 66
2. Norway (Bjarte Askeland) ........................................ 70
3. Poland (Katarzyna Ludwichowska-Redo) ............................ 72
4. Hungary (Attila Menyhârd) ....................................... 82
5. England and the Commonwealth (Ken Oliphant)...................... 85
6. United States of America (Michael D. Green) ..................... 89
7. Japan (Fumihiro Nagano) ......................................... 92
A. Flexible system in Japanese tort law .................... 92
I. Judgement of unlawfulness ........................... 92
IL Right to »considerable probability of survival« ..... 92
III. Reduction of liability based on the degree
of contribution ........................................ 93
IV. Gradual liability of joint tortfeasors ............. 93
B. Perspective for flexible system in Japanese legislation. 94
I. Desirability of flexible system in legislation
in general ............................................. 94
Helmut Koziol (ed)5 Comparative Stimulations for Developing Tort Law
Table of Contents
II. Prerequisites for using the flexible system
for tort law legislation ............................... 94
1. Selection of the areas of application ........... 94
2. The way of listing the relevant factors .......... 95
C. Concluding Remarks (Helmut Koziol) ............................... 96
1. General remarks................................................ 96
2. Method of drafting rules ........................................ 96
3. Clear delineation between legal instruments and interim forms .. 99
4. Absolutely protected and unprotected interests ................. 99
5. Partial compensation ........................................... 100
Topic III
Liability of Children as well as Persons with Reduced Abilities
and the Notion of Fault
A. Comparative Stimulations (Helmut Koziol) .......................... 105
1. Liabilityof children............................................. 105
2. Liability of mentally disabled persons........................... 107
3. Liability of children and mentally disabled persons
and the notion of fault........................................ 107
B. Statements by Country Reporters ................................... 110
1. France (Jean-Sébastien Borghetti) ............................... 110
2. Norway (Bjarte Askeland) ........................................ 113
3. Poland (Katarzyna Ludwichowska-Redo) ............................ 117
4. Hungary (Attila Menyhârd) ....................................... 125
5. England and the Commonwealth (Ken Oliphant)...................... 128
6. United States of America (Michael D. Green) ..................... 130
7. Japan (Fumihiro Nagano) ......................................... 133
A. State of Japanese law with regard to liability due to
misconduct of children and mentally disabled ............. 133
I. Exclusion of liability ............................... 133
IL Liability of supervisors .............................. 133
1. Liability based on art 714....................... 133
2. Liability based on art 709 ....................... 134
B, Evaluation ................................................. 135
L Tendency of Japanese law................................ 135
II. Necessity of the liability of supervisors ............ 135
III. Fault-based or strict liability? .................... 136
Helmut Kozioï (ed) ^ Comparative Stimulations for Developing* Tort Law
Table of Contents
C. Maintainability of the objective standard of negligence...... 136
I. Contradiction? ......................................... 137
1. Change of the meaning of capacity for liability..... 137
2. Relationship between objective theory
and capacity for liability ......................... 137
II. Practical difference between the two theories .......... 137
III. Justification of the concept of objective fault:
Liability based on social trust? ....................... 138
C. Concluding Remarks (Helmut Koziol) ................................... 140
1. Liability of children and mentally disabled persons ............... 140
2. The notion of fault ............................................... 143
Topic IV
Liability for Agents and Agents’ Liability
A. Comparative Stimulations (Helmut Koziol) .......................... 149
B. Statements by Country Reporters ................................... 154
1. France (Jean-Sébastien Borghetti) ............................. 154
2. Norway (BjarteAskeland) ......................................... 156
3. Poland (Katarzyna Ludwichowska-Redo) ............................ 160
4. Hungary (Attila Menyhârd) ....................................... 167
5. England and the Commonwealth (Ken Oliphant) ..................... 172
6. United States of America (Michael D. Green) ..................... 173
7. Japan (Fumihiro Nagano) ......................................... 176
A. Liability of principals for the misconduct of auxiliaries ... 176
L Grounds of liability ................................... 176
1. State of the argument in Japan ................... 176
2. Some answers to criticism ........................ 176
a) Existence of dangerousness ..................... 177
b) Supplement by the idea of realisation
of profit....................................... 177
c) Some special characteristics of the liability
of the principal as strict liability ......... 177
IL Range of liability .................................... 178
1. Relationship of direction and supervision ........ 178
2. Requirement for »business« ......................... 178
B. Liability of the auxiliary................................... 179
L Proportion of burden in relation to the principal ...... 179
Helmut Koziol fed) » Comparative Stimulations for Developing Tort Law
Table of Contents
II. Liability of the auxiliary toward the victim ........... 179
III. Excursus:
Liability of enterprise due to its own negligence ...... 180
C. Concluding Remarks (Helmut Koziol) ................................... 182
1. Liability for Agents .............................................. 182
a) General remarks ................................................ 182
b) Strict liability ............................................... 184
c) Fault-based liability .......................................... 192
d) Solution........................................................ 193
2. Agents’ liability.................................................. 194
Topic V
Limitations of Liability and Lawful Alternative Conduct
A. Comparative Stimulations (Helmut Koziol) ........................ 199
1. Limitations of liability ...................................... 199
2. Lawful alternative conduct ...................................... 200
a) A problem of natural causation
or protective purpose of the rule? ...................... 200
b) The notion of natural causation .......................... 201
c) The defence of possible lawful conduct ................... 204
B. Statements by Country Reporters ................................. 209
1. France (Jean-Sébastien Borghetti) ............................... 209
2. Norway (Bjarte Askeland) ........................................ 212
3. Poland (Katarzyna Ludwichowska-Redo) ............................ 215
4. Hungary (Attila Menyhârd) ....................................... 223
5. England and the Commonwealth (Ken Oliphant)...................... 224
6. United States of America (Michael D. Green) ..................... 226
7. Japan (Fumihiro Nagano) ......................................... 229
A. Distinction between causation and protective purpose
of the infringed rule ................................... 229
L Tendency of Japanese argument ......................... 229
1. Transition of argument ......................... 229
2. Recent tendency: Highlighting the normative
element of factual causation ................... 230
3. Treatment of lawful alternative conduct ........ 230
II. Regarding the distinction made by Koziol ............ 230
Helmut Koziol (cd) · Comparative Stimulations for Developing Tort Law
Table of Contents
1. Evaluation ........................................ 230
a) Meaning: Avoidability of result as the minimum
requirement for liability ...................... 230
b) Problem: Difference between lawful alternative
conduct and protective purpose of the rule .. 231
2. One possible solution: Three-stage distinction? ... 231
B. Remarks on each group of cases ............................... 232
L Different characters of problems ...................... 232
1. Difference: Unavoidability or permission
to infringe the right ............................. 232
2. Problem: Not protective purpose but necessity
of protection of rights ........................... 232
II. Cases of lack of informed consent.................... 232
1. Self-responsibility of the patient ................ 232
2. Possibility of compensation due to infringement
of right to self-determination .................... 233
III. Cases of detention without appropriate procedure ... 233
1. Purpose of the procedural regulation .............. 233
2. Possibility to limit compensable damage............ 233
IV. Summary ............................................... 234
C. Concluding Remarks (Helmut Koziol) .................................. 235
1. The notion of causation ........................................ 235
2. The problem of alternative lawful conduct ...................... 237
Topic VI
Compensation in Kind for Non-Pecuniary Harm,
in Particular the Finding of a Violation
A. Comparative Stimulations (Helmut Koziol) ...................... 243
B. Statements by Country Reporters ............................... 245
1. France (Jean-Sébastien Borghetti) ............................ 245
2. Norway (Bjarte Askeland) ..................................... 246
3. Poland (Katarzyna Ludwichowska-Redo) ......................... 249
4. Hungary (Attila Menyhârd) .................................... 252
5. England and the Commonwealth (Ken Oliphant)................... 254
6. United States of America (Michael D. Green) .................. 255
7. Japan (Fumihiro Nagano) ...................................... 256
A. Japanese discussion on restitution in kind ............. 256
Helmut Koziol fed) « Comparative Stimulations for Developing Tort Law
Table of Contents
L Purpose of art 723 ...................................... 256
IL Content of »appropriate measure« ........................ 256
III. Reach of art 723 ........................................ 257
IV. Summary ................................................. 257
B, Perspective for finding of a violation as a type of restitution
in kind in Japanese law ...................................... 258
L Finding of a violation as a method of restoration
of non-pecuniary damage .................................. 258
1. Starting point ....................................... 258
2. Possibility of extension ............................. 258
3. Limit of extension ................................... 259
II. Finding of a violation as a pure method of deterrence ... 260
C. Concluding Remarks (Helmut Koziol) .................................... 261
Index ...................................................................... 265
List of Authors ............................................................ 273
Helmut Koziol fed) = Comparative Stimulations for Developing Tort Law
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author2 | Koziol, Helmut 1940- |
| author2_role | edt |
| author2_variant | h k hk |
| author_GND | (DE-588)140928049 (DE-588)1064664288 |
| author_facet | Koziol, Helmut 1940- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV042811546 |
| classification_rvk | PU 1532 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)921218579 (DE-599)BSZ434663611 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01914nam a2200373 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042811546</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20170323 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150908s2015 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783709700600</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-7097-0060-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)921218579</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ434663611</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 1532</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139918:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative stimulations for developing tort law</subfield><subfield code="b">compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation</subfield><subfield code="c">Helmut Koziol (ed.). Contributors Bjarte Askeland ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wien</subfield><subfield code="b">Sramek</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XIII, 273 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Civil law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unerlaubte Handlung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061688-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Unerlaubte Handlung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061688-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Koziol, Helmut</subfield><subfield code="d">1940-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)140928049</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askeland, Bjarte</subfield><subfield code="d">1965-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1064664288</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028241039&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028241039&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028241039</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV042811546 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:10:10Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783709700600 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028241039 |
| oclc_num | 921218579 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 DE-739 DE-384 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 DE-739 DE-384 |
| physical | XIII, 273 S. |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Sramek |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Civil law |
| spelling | Comparative stimulations for developing tort law compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation Helmut Koziol (ed.). Contributors Bjarte Askeland ... Wien Sramek 2015 XIII, 273 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Civil law Unerlaubte Handlung (DE-588)4061688-5 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Unerlaubte Handlung (DE-588)4061688-5 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s DE-604 Koziol, Helmut 1940- (DE-588)140928049 edt Askeland, Bjarte 1965- Sonstige (DE-588)1064664288 oth Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028241039&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028241039&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Comparative stimulations for developing tort law compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation Unerlaubte Handlung (DE-588)4061688-5 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4061688-5 (DE-588)4115712-6 |
| title | Comparative stimulations for developing tort law compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation |
| title_auth | Comparative stimulations for developing tort law compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation |
| title_exact_search | Comparative stimulations for developing tort law compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation |
| title_full | Comparative stimulations for developing tort law compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation Helmut Koziol (ed.). Contributors Bjarte Askeland ... |
| title_fullStr | Comparative stimulations for developing tort law compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation Helmut Koziol (ed.). Contributors Bjarte Askeland ... |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative stimulations for developing tort law compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation Helmut Koziol (ed.). Contributors Bjarte Askeland ... |
| title_short | Comparative stimulations for developing tort law |
| title_sort | comparative stimulations for developing tort law compensation for personal injuries all or nothing rule liability of children and the notion of fault liability for agents lawful alternative conduct finding of a violation |
| title_sub | compensation for personal injuries ; all-or-nothing rule ; liability of children and the notion of fault ; liability for agents ; lawful alternative conduct ; finding of a violation |
| topic | Unerlaubte Handlung (DE-588)4061688-5 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Unerlaubte Handlung Rechtsvergleich |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028241039&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028241039&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT koziolhelmut comparativestimulationsfordevelopingtortlawcompensationforpersonalinjuriesallornothingruleliabilityofchildrenandthenotionoffaultliabilityforagentslawfulalternativeconductfindingofaviolation AT askelandbjarte comparativestimulationsfordevelopingtortlawcompensationforpersonalinjuriesallornothingruleliabilityofchildrenandthenotionoffaultliabilityforagentslawfulalternativeconductfindingofaviolation |