Contributory negligence: a historical and comparative study
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Leiden ; Boston
Brill Nijhoff
2014
|
| Series: | Legal history library
Volume 15 Studies in the history of private law Volume 7 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Physical Description: | XXI, 475 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9789004278714 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV042181008 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190522 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 141112s2014 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2014029485 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004278714 |c hardback |9 978-90-04-27871-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)891758936 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBV791411958 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-19 |a DE-739 | ||
| 084 | |a PW 9255 |0 (DE-625)140998: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dongen, Emanuel G. D. van |d 1982- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1059951665 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contributory negligence |b a historical and comparative study |c by E. G. D. van Dongen |
| 264 | 1 | |a Leiden ; Boston |b Brill Nijhoff |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a XXI, 475 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Legal history library |v Volume 15 | |
| 490 | 1 | |a Studies in the history of private law |v Volume 7 | |
| 502 | |a Zugl.: Maastricht, Univ., Diss., 2013 | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Mitverschulden |0 (DE-588)4039762-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strafrecht |0 (DE-588)4057795-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Mitverschulden |0 (DE-588)4039762-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Strafrecht |0 (DE-588)4057795-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Geschichte |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, e-book |z 978-90-04-27872-1 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Legal history library |v Volume 15 |w (DE-604)BV035082541 |9 15 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Studies in the history of private law |v Volume 7 |w (DE-604)BV037416329 |9 7 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m HBZ Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027620244&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027620244 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |g 181 |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804152691085017088 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Titel: Contributory negligence
Autor: Dongen, Emanuel G. D. van
Jahr: 2014
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments .......................................................................................... XIII
Abbreviations .................................................................................................. XV
Chapter One Introduction.............................................................................. 1
1.1 The subject of this study...................................................................... 1
1.2 Methodology..........................................................................................5
1.2.1 Central questions.....................................................................5
1.2.2 Comparative legal history.......................................................7
1.2.3 Definition of contributory negligence..................................7
1.2.4 Delineation of the study..........................................................9
1.3 Structure................................................................................................ 10
Chapter Two Roman Law in Antiquity....................................................... 13
2.1 Introduction......................................................................................... 13
2.1.1 Subject and purpose of this chapter................................... 13
2.1.2 Structure and method........................................................... 15
2.2 The origin of the regula of D. 50.17.203.......................................... 16
2.2.1 The text of D. 50.17.203......................................................... 16
2.2.2 Translation of D. 50.17.203................................................... 18
2.2.3 Inscriptio................................................................................... 19
2.2.4 Exegesis according to (classical) Roman law.................... 21
2.3 Alfenus reply in the case of the innkeeper................................... 30
2.3.1 The text of D. 9.2.52.1........................................................................................................................30
2.3.2 Translation of D. 9.2.52.1............................................................................................................38
2.3.3 Inscriptio....................................................................................................................................................................39
2.3.4 Exegesis according to (classical) Roman law......................................41
2.4 Ulpian s reply in the case of the javelin throwers................................................54
2.4.1 The text of D. 9.2.9.4............................................................. 54
2.4.2 Translation of D. 9.2.9.4....................................................... 55
2.4.3 Inscriptio.................................................................................. 55
2.4.4 Exegesis according to classical Roman law...................... 56
2.4.5 Post-classical development..................................................72
VIII CONTENTS
2.5 Ulpian s reply in the barber case......................................................78
2.5.1 The text of D. 9.2.11pr.............................................................78
2.5.2 Translation of D. 9.2.11pr...................................................... 80
2.5.3 Inscriptio................................................................................... 81
2.5.4 Exegesis according to classical Roman law.......................83
2.5.5 Post-classical development (Justinian law)..................... 98
2.6 General treatment of all relevant cases in Justinian law............ 98
2.7 Concluding remarks......................................................................... 102
Chapter Three Medieval lus Commune....................................................... 105
3.1 Introduction.......................................................................................105
3.1.1 Subject and purpose of this chapter.................................105
3.1.2 Structure and method.........................................................107
3.2 Medieval Roman legal scholarship................................................109
3.2.1 Introduction..........................................................................109
3.2.2 Starting point 1: the doctrine of culpae compensatio..... Ill
3.2.2.1 The case of the javelin throwers..........................115
3.2.2.2 The case of the barber.......................................... 123
3.2.2.3 The case of the shopkeeper................................ 129
3.2.3 Starting point 2: the rule of D. 50.17.203........................ 139
3.2.4 Concluding remarks............................................................. 142
3.3 Canon law............................................................................................ 146
3.3.1 Introduction.......................................................................... 146
3.3.2 Negligence and causation in canon law........................... 147
3.3.3 Accidental homicide: early canonists.............................. 153
3.3.4 Accidental homicide: two cases from the Liber Extra... 156
3.3.4.1 The case of X 5.12.8............................................... 156
3.3.4.2 The case of X 5.12.9...............................................163
3.3.5 Contributory negligence according to the law
of decretals............................................................................ 168
3.3.5.1 The case of X 5.16.6...............................................168
3.3.5.2 Culpae compensatio.............................................. 173
3.3.6 The maxim of VI 5.12.86...................................................... 175
3.4 Short comparative remarks............................................................. 177
3.4.1 Structure and purpose......................................................... 177
3.4.2 Byzantine law........................................................................ 178
3.4.3 Indigenous law...................................................................... 179
3.4.3.1 Examples following the all-or-nothing
approach................................................................. 179
3.4.3.2 Examples including a partition of damages.... 182
3.5 Concluding remarks......................................................................... 183
CONTENTS IX
Chapter Four Early Modem Period............................................................189
4.1 Introduction.......................................................................................189
4.1.1 Subject and purpose of this chapter................................. 189
4.1.2 Method and structure...........................................................191
4.2 Legal humanism................................................................................ 192
4.2.1 Introduction to the mos gallicus and mos italicus.......... 192
4.2.2 Humanistic thoughts based on the rule of D. 50.17.203.. 195
4.2.2.1 The origin of D. 50.17.203.................................. 196
4.2.2.2 According to the humanists, did D. 50.17.203
really concern contributory negligence in
classical Roman law?............................................ 199
4.2.2.3 Examples of the application of D. 50.17.203..... 200
4.2.2.4 Preliminary conclusion....................................... 203
4.2.3 New insights as regards D. 9.2.52.1.................................. 204
4.2.3.1 The case of D. 9.2.52.1 as an example of
self-defence..................................................................................................................204
4.2.3.2 The connection with D. 50.17.203......................................205
4.2.3.3 Compensation of unlawful acts..............................................206
4.2.4 New insights as regards the case of the javelin
throwers................................................................................................................................................................207
4.2.4.1 The link between D. 9.2.9.4 and D. 9.2.10....... 207
4.2.4.2 Solving D. 9.2.9.4 with a new criterion:
(in)iustum?............................................................. 210
4.2.4.3 A case from practice: application of a
iudicatio scheme................................................... 211
4.2.4.4 Contributory negligence as avoidability.......... 211
4.2.4.5 Faber s criterion of gravior culpa...................... 212
4.2.4.6 Conclusion on the humanistic contribution
to the development of the theory based on
D. 9.2.9.4................................................................ 214
4.2.5 New insights as regards the case of the barber............... 214
4.2.5.1 A new approach to the actors in D. 9.2.11pr..... 214
4.2.5.2 Application of the medieval doctrine of
culpae compensatio?............................................ 216
4.2.5.3 Influence of the mos italicus in the thinking of
Suarez de Mendoza.............................................. 216
4.2.5.4 Application of the maior culpa doctrine
to D. 9.2.11pr.?......................................................... 217
4.2.5.5 Some concluding words on the theories
developed by humanists based on D. 9.2.11pr..... 221
X
CONTENTS
4.3 A general introduction to the period of the Reception
of Roman law........................................................................ 222
4.3.1 Reception of the lexAquilia............................................... 222
4.3.2 Requirements for a succesful claim for damages.......... 224
4.3.3 Different types of damage.................................................. 226
4.4 Roman-Dutch law............................................................................. 227
4.4.1 Introduction......................................................................... 227
4.4.2 Liability based on the lexAquilia..................................... 228
4.4.2.1 New starting points for the theory of
culpa maior............................................................. 231
4.4.2.2 Criminal law.......................................................... 233
4.4.2.3 Preliminary conclusion....................................... 240
4.4.3 Maritime collisions.............................................................. 241
4.4.3.1 Introduction to the topic..................................... 241
4.4.3.2 Collision cases described by Grotius................ 242
4.4.3.3 Cases in which one ship was to blame............ 244
4.4.3.4 Accidental collision damage.............................. 245
4.4.3.5 Collision damage caused by the fault of
both parties........................................................... 250
4.4.3.6 Preliminary conclusion on collision cases..... 254
4.5 Usus modernus pandectarum.......................................................... 255
4.5.1 Introduction......................................................................... 255
4.5.2 Usus modernus in Germany............................................... 258
4.5.2.1 Introduction.......................................................... 258
4.5.2.2 Contributory negligence in theory and in
practice: a problem of causality....................... 260
4.5.2.3 Contributory negligence in theory and in
practice: a problem of negligence.....................261
4.5.2.4 Solving cases of contributory negligence
without replying upon the contributory
negligence of the injured party......................... 273
4.5.2.5 The criterion of the auctor rixae as an
alternative way to solve the problem of
contributory negligence..................................... 274
4.5.3 Giurisprudenza pratica in Italy........................................281
4.6 The northern natural law school.................................................. 285
4.6.1 Introduction......................................................................... 285
4.6.2 Scholars who followed the old approach........................ 286
4.6.2.1 Variant 1: the existence of contributory
negligence leads to a denial of claim............... 286
CONTENTS
XI
4.6.2.2 Variant 2: applying the doctrine of
maior culpa............................................................. 291
4.6.3 A new approach: Christian Wolff..................................... 295
4.7 Concluding remarks........................................................................ 298
4.7.1 The humanistic contribution............................................ 298
4.7.2 Reception and usus modernus.......................................... 299
4.7.3 Collision cases.......................................................................301
4.7.4 Natural law/rationalism.................................................... 302
Chapter Five Modern and Contemporary Law...................................... 303
5.1 Introduction: content, method and structure............................ 303
5.2 Codifications around 1800............................................................. 308
5.3 Conservatism in nineteenth-century legal doctrine and
the struggle of nineteenth-century judges.................................. 312
5.3.1 French exegetical school: faute de la victime.................. 312
5.3.1.1 Introduction..........................................................312
5.3.1.2 Faute commune...................................................... 313
5.3.2 The revival of Roman law in nineteenth-century
Germany.................................................................................319
5.3.3 The situation in the Netherlands until 1916.................. 324
5.4 Codifications around 1900.............................................................. 331
5.4.1 The German drafts for codification.................................. 331
5.4.2 The solution of the German Bürgerliche Gesetzbuch
(1900)..................................................................................... 333
5.5 Modern contemporary solutions to the problem of
contributory negligence.................................................................. 339
5.5.1 The Netherlands.................................................................. 339
5.5.1.1 New directions in Dutch case law
and literature in the twentieth century........... 339
5.5.1.2 Recent codification: The Dutch Burgerlijk
Wetboek of 1992..................................................... 343
5.5.2 France..................................................................................... 348
5.5.2.1 Contemporary solution in France.................... 348
5.5.2.2 Contributory negligence in the context of
liability without fault........................................... 351
5.6 Traffic accidents: rise and fall of the all-or-nothing
approach?........................................................................................... 353
5.6.1 Traffic accidents: France.................................................... 353
5.6.2 Traffic accidents: Germany................................................ 355
XII
CONTENTS
5.6.3 Traffic accidents: The Netherlands.................................. 356
5.7 Contributory negligence after the damaging event................. 358
5.8 Harmonisation: rules for the future?........................................... 362
5.9 Concluding remarks........................................................................ 367
5.9.1 The concept of contributory negligence in the
nineteenth century.............................................................. 367
5.9.2 The concept of contributory negligence in codes and
in contemporary law........................................................... 369
5.9.3 Contributory negligence after the damaging event..... 372
Chapter Six Summary and Concluding Remarks............................... 373
6.1 Introduction..................................................................................... 373
6.2 Roman law in Antiquity.................................................................. 374
6.3. Medieval ius commune.................................................................... 376
6.3.1 Medieval Roman legal scholarship.................................. 376
6.3.2 Medieval canon law........................................................... 377
6.3.3 Some final words on medieval ius commune.................. 378
6.4 The humanistic contribution......................................................... 379
6.5 Reception, Roman-Dutch law and usus modernus.................... 379
6.6 The northern natural law school................................................... 381
6.7 The concept of contributory negligence in the
nineteenth century..................................................................................................................................................382
6.8 The concept of contributory negligence in modern and
contemporary law......................................................................................................................................................384
6.9 To conclude..............................................................................................................................................................................386
Bibliography ................................................................................................ 389
Index of Names............................................................................................... 453
Index of Sources.............................................................................................. 459
Index of Cases ................................................................................................. 473
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Dongen, Emanuel G. D. van 1982- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1059951665 |
| author_facet | Dongen, Emanuel G. D. van 1982- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Dongen, Emanuel G. D. van 1982- |
| author_variant | e g d v d egdv egdvd |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV042181008 |
| classification_rvk | PW 9255 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)891758936 (DE-599)GBV791411958 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| era | Geschichte gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02068nam a2200493 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042181008</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190522 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">141112s2014 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2014029485</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789004278714</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-04-27871-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)891758936</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBV791411958</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PW 9255</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)140998:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dongen, Emanuel G. D. van</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1059951665</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contributory negligence</subfield><subfield code="b">a historical and comparative study</subfield><subfield code="c">by E. G. D. van Dongen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Leiden ; Boston</subfield><subfield code="b">Brill Nijhoff</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXI, 475 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Legal history library</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studies in the history of private law</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zugl.: Maastricht, Univ., Diss., 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mitverschulden</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4039762-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057795-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mitverschulden</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4039762-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Strafrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057795-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, e-book</subfield><subfield code="z">978-90-04-27872-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal history library</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 15</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV035082541</subfield><subfield code="9">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Studies in the history of private law</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV037416329</subfield><subfield code="9">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027620244&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027620244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">181</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV042181008 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T01:14:44Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789004278714 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2014029485 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027620244 |
| oclc_num | 891758936 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-739 |
| physical | XXI, 475 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Brill Nijhoff |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Legal history library Studies in the history of private law |
| series2 | Legal history library Studies in the history of private law |
| spelling | Dongen, Emanuel G. D. van 1982- Verfasser (DE-588)1059951665 aut Contributory negligence a historical and comparative study by E. G. D. van Dongen Leiden ; Boston Brill Nijhoff 2014 XXI, 475 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Legal history library Volume 15 Studies in the history of private law Volume 7 Zugl.: Maastricht, Univ., Diss., 2013 Geschichte gnd rswk-swf Mitverschulden (DE-588)4039762-2 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Mitverschulden (DE-588)4039762-2 s Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s Geschichte z DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, e-book 978-90-04-27872-1 Legal history library Volume 15 (DE-604)BV035082541 15 Studies in the history of private law Volume 7 (DE-604)BV037416329 7 HBZ Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027620244&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Dongen, Emanuel G. D. van 1982- Contributory negligence a historical and comparative study Legal history library Studies in the history of private law Mitverschulden (DE-588)4039762-2 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4039762-2 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4057795-8 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Contributory negligence a historical and comparative study |
| title_auth | Contributory negligence a historical and comparative study |
| title_exact_search | Contributory negligence a historical and comparative study |
| title_full | Contributory negligence a historical and comparative study by E. G. D. van Dongen |
| title_fullStr | Contributory negligence a historical and comparative study by E. G. D. van Dongen |
| title_full_unstemmed | Contributory negligence a historical and comparative study by E. G. D. van Dongen |
| title_short | Contributory negligence |
| title_sort | contributory negligence a historical and comparative study |
| title_sub | a historical and comparative study |
| topic | Mitverschulden (DE-588)4039762-2 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Mitverschulden Rechtsvergleich Strafrecht Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027620244&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV035082541 (DE-604)BV037416329 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dongenemanuelgdvan contributorynegligenceahistoricalandcomparativestudy |