Sherman, J. (1789). The administrations of parochial bishops valid, but those of diocesans invalid: A supplement to the answer, to the Revd. Mr. Leaming's Dissertations: and to three letters for the purpose of supporting the exclusive right of ordination by diocesan bishops: two of them signed Rector and one Weaver. Supposed to originate from the resentment of the diocesan, or superintendant of all the diocesan clergy and churches in Connecticut. Printed: by Forgue and Bulkeley.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Sherman, Josiah. The Administrations of Parochial Bishops Valid, but Those of Diocesans Invalid: A Supplement to the Answer, to the Revd. Mr. Leaming's Dissertations: And to Three Letters for the Purpose of Supporting the Exclusive Right of Ordination by Diocesan Bishops: Two of Them Signed Rector and One Weaver. Supposed to Originate from the Resentment of the Diocesan, or Superintendant of All the Diocesan Clergy and Churches in Connecticut. Fairfield [Conn.]: Printed: by Forgue and Bulkeley, 1789.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Sherman, Josiah. The Administrations of Parochial Bishops Valid, but Those of Diocesans Invalid: A Supplement to the Answer, to the Revd. Mr. Leaming's Dissertations: And to Three Letters for the Purpose of Supporting the Exclusive Right of Ordination by Diocesan Bishops: Two of Them Signed Rector and One Weaver. Supposed to Originate from the Resentment of the Diocesan, or Superintendant of All the Diocesan Clergy and Churches in Connecticut. Printed: by Forgue and Bulkeley, 1789.