The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases:
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bruxelles
Bruylant
2012
|
| Series: | Global Competition Law Centre
2 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Physical Description: | 326 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9782802735663 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV040881328 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20241028 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 130314s2012 be |||| 10||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9782802735663 |c (pbk.) : 60,00 EUR |9 978-2-8027-3566-3 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)801752833 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV040881328 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a be |c BE | ||
| 049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-M382 |a DE-91 |a DE-19 | ||
| 084 | |a PS 2960 |0 (DE-625)139745: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a JUR 395f |2 stub | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases |c edited by Massimo Merola, Jacques Derenne |
| 264 | 1 | |a Bruxelles |b Bruylant |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 326 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Global Competition Law Centre |v 2 | |
| 490 | 0 | |a GCLC Annual Conference series | |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kartellrecht |0 (DE-588)4029788-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kartellrecht |0 (DE-588)4029788-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Merola, Massimo |0 (DE-588)171247280 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Derenne, Jacques |0 (DE-588)1033173622 |4 edt | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Global Competition Law Centre |v 2 |w (DE-604)BV040948110 |9 2 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025861082&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025861082 | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1814185392074653696 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
. 13
FOREWORD
. 15
CHAPTER ONE
GENERAL ISSUES
JUDICIAL REVIEW IN EUROPEAN UNION COMPETITION LAW:
A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT
. 21
Introduction
. 21
I. The Functions of Judicial Review
. 23
A. The Case for a Functional Approach of Judicial Review
. 23
B. A Proposed Typology of the Functions of Judicial Review
. . 24
1.
Safeguarding Universal Values
—
The Lawyer's
Standpoint
. 24
2.
Promoting Welfare
—
The Economist's Standpoint
. 26
a) Eradicate Decisional Errors
. 26
b) Establish Normative Standards
. 27
3.
Ensuring Accountability
—
The Political Scientist's
Standpoint
. 29
4.
Other Functions of Judicial Review
. 30
II. Importance of Judicial
Review in EU
Competition Law
. 31
A. Importance of Judicial Review in Competition Law
. 31
1.
Competition Law is Prone to Serious Errors
. 32
2.
Competition Law interferes with Fundamental Rights
. 36
3.
Competition Law may not be enforced in the Public
Interest
. 37
B. Importance of Judicial Review in
EU
competition law
. 39
1.
Inadequate Enforcement Structure
. 39
2.
Insufficient Checks and Balances
. 42
3.
The influence of Commission Decisions at the National
Level
. 44
table
of
contents
Pages
III.
Nature
and Scope of Judicial Review in
EU
Competition
Law
. 44
A. The Provisions of the TFEU
. 45
B. Full vs. Restrained Review of Commission Decisions
. 46
1.
Review of the Law
. 46
2.
Review of the Facts
. 47
IV. Quantitative Assessment of the GC's Judicial Review
. 54
A. Purpose, Background and Methodology
. 55
B. Performance of the GC in relation
to the Safeguarding of Fundamental Principles
. 57
1.
Protecting the Participation of Stakeholders
. 58
2.
Protecting Fundamental Principles
. 58
a) References to Instruments protecting Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms
. 59
b) References to General Principles of
EU
Law (including
Competition Law)
. 60
3.
Conclusion
. 60
C. Performance of the GC in relation to the Promotion of
Welfare
. 61
V. A Qualitative Analysis of the "Setting of Normative
Standards" Function in the Case-Law of the General Court
. 65
Conclusions
. 71
THE SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN
EU
ECONOMIC CASES
. . 73
I. The nature of the
EU
judicial review: a control of legality
. 74
A. Limited control
. 74
External and internal legality
. 75
No power of substitution
-
No appeal
. 75
Comprehensive review, but deference to the Commission
. . 76
B. Unlimited jurisdiction
. 77
II. Criteria used to justify a limited judicial review
. 78
A. The rule of law
. 78
Self-restraint
. 79
Need for a comprehensive review v. alleged necessity to
limit judicial review
. 80
B. The category of act
. 81
1.
Political discretion
. 81
a) Legislative acts
. 81
b) Priority choices
. 81
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
Pages
2.
Technical discretion
. 82
a) Expert
knowledge needed
. 82
b)
Complex economic appraisals
. 82
Modernisation
-
Limits to deferential approach
. 83
COMPETITION LAW CASES BEFORE THE
EU
COURTS:
IS THE WELL RUNNING DRY?
. 87
Introduction
. 87
I. Direct actions in competition law cases: no flood in sight
. 88
A. Potential for an increase of direct actions in competition
law cases
. 88
B. The number of direct actions in competition and State Aid
cases has not increased significantly
. 93
II. Preliminary references in competition late cases: no
significant increase either
. 94
A. Potential for an increase of preliminary references in
competition law cases
. 94
B. The number of preliminary actions in competition and State
Aid cases has not increased significantly
. 95
III. The potential for a decrease in the number of competition
cases before the
EU
Courts
. 96
Conclusion
—
Why does it matter?
. 99
CHAPTER TWO
THE
EU
COURTS' SCRUTINY OVER THE COMMISSION
IN COMPETITION LAW CASES
STANDARD OF JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER ARTICLES
101
AND
102
TFEU
. 103
Introduction
. 103
I. Judicial review of antitrust decisions
. 104
A. Grounds of judicial review
. 104
B. Standard of judicial review
. 105
1.
Standard of review under Article
101
TFEU
. 107
2.
Standard of review under Article
102
TFEU
. 108
III. Recent case law of the
EU Courts
.
Ill
A. GlaxoSmithKline
v
Commission
.
Ill
B.
Airosa
v
Commission
. 113
table
of
contents
Pages
С.
AstraZeneca
v
Commission
. 114
IV.
The future
of judicial review in antitrust cases
. 116
A. Towards a greater intensity of review
. 116
1.
The experience of the General Court in competition
matters
. 116
2.
Expert evidence before the
EU
Courts
. 118
3.
The European Convention of Human Rights
. 119
4.
Direct applicability of Articles
101
and
102. 120
B. Rationale for limiting judicial review
. 121
1.
Specialist knowledge and expertise
. 121
2.
Article
263
TFEU
. 122
3.
Separation of powers in the
EU
. 123
Conclusion
. 126
ANNULMENT PROCEEDINGS IN ANTITRUST CASES
(ARTICLES
101
AND
102
TFUE)
—
STANDARD OF JUDICIAL
REVIEW OVER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
. 129
I. Control of legality and standard of review in competition law
cases: the example of Arts.
101(1)
and
102
TFEU
. 129
II. Control of legality on the Commission's exercise of its fining
powers
. 130
III. From "comprehensive review" to the "margin of
appreciation": the example of Art.
85(3)
ЕЕС/бЦЗ)
EC
before Modernization
. 131
IV. Overexpansion of the judicial deference doctrine in the
recent
EU
case-law
. 132
IV. Judicial deference is contrary to the right to full and
effective access to "an independent and impartial tribunal"
within the meaning of Art.
6(1)
ECHR
. 135
THE GENERAL COURT'S UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
OVER FINES
. 139
A CHALLENGE FOR EUROPE'S JUDGES:
THE REVIEW OF FINES IN COMPETITION CASES
. 147
Introduction
. 147
I. The European Commission's Fining Powers and Policy
. 148
II. The Scope of Judicial Competence
. 153
table
of
contents
Pages
III. The Court's Practice
. 156
A. Merits adaptation of the fine
. 157
B. Assessment of proportionality
. 159
С
Technical adaptation of the fine
. 160
D. Deference to the Commission's discretion
. 161
IV. Gravity, Duration, Intention and Negligence
. 164
A. Summary as to current judicial practice
. 165
V. The New Constitutional Order
. 168
A. The penal characteristics of how fines are imposed
. 168
B. Summary of the human rights analysis
. 170
С
"Administrative" or "criminal"?
. 171
D. Other problems of non-judicial condemnations
. 174
E. "Quasi-criminal", "soft criminal" offences, and civil
penalties
. 175
F. The
Prímagáz
precedent
. 178
G. The problem in summary
. 179
VI. Proportionality
. 179
Conclusion
. 181
ANNULMENT PROCEEDINGS IN
EU
MERGER CASES:
WORTH THE EFFORT?
. 193
Introduction
. 193
I. Spectrum of review
. 193
II. Evolution of the role of
EU
courts in merger cases
. 194
III. The early years
. 194
IV. The watershed cases
. 194
V. Consequences of the Watershed cases
. 197
VI.
EU
merger appeals post
2002. 198
VII.
Timing
. 199
Conclusions
. 200
SUBSTANTIVE STANDARD OF JUDICIAL CONTROL
IN STATE AID MATTERS
. 203
Introduction
. 204
I. The standard of control as defined by the
EU
Courts
. 209
A. Scope and characteristics of the restrained control
. 209
table
of
contents
Pages
В.
Scope and characteristics of the normal control
and limitations thereon
. 215
II. Getting closer to a coherent and comprehensive standard of
judicial review in the field of State aid
. 226
A. Specifying in detail the scope of application of the
'restrained control'
. 230
1.
The rationale behind 'restrained control'
. 230
2.
The material scope of application of the 'restrained
control'
. 233
B. The characteristics of the 'restrained control' as opposed
to the 'comprehensive control'
. 239
С
Admissibility of a 'full control of proportionality' in the
field of State aid?
. 244
Conclusions
. 247
ADMISSIBILITY OF ACTIONS CHALLENGING COMMISSION
STATE AID DECISIONS
. 249
Introduction
. 249
I. Interest to Act in respect of State aid decisions
. 252
II. Individual Concern
. 253
A. Beneficiaries
. 254
B. Competitors and complainants
. 256
1.
First phase decisions
. 257
2.
Second phase decisions
. 259
С
National authorities other than central government
. 261
D. Negotiators
. 261
E. Trades unions and employees associations
. 263
F. Mixing of procedural rights and pleas as to the merits
. 264
Conclusion
. 264
CHAPTER THREE
INSTITUTIONAL AND PROCEDURAL CHALLENGES
FACED BY THE
EU
COURTS IN COMPETITION
LAW CASES
THE ROLE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE IN ENSURING
COMPLIANCE WITH FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN
COMPETITION CASES SINCE THE LISBON TREATY
. 267
10
BRUYLANT
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Pages
I. European Competition law and Fundamental rights post the
Lisbon Treaty
. 267
II. Showdown in Strasbourg?
. 269
III. The exercise of unlimited jurisdiction with respect to fines
. 273
IV. Shifting focus
. 274
"MARGINAL REVIEW BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF
JUSTICE IN COMPETITION CASES AND ITS COMPATIBILITY
WITH FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
. 277
I. Article
7
ECHR (Article
49
of the Charter)
. 278
II. Article
6
ECHR (Article
47
of the Charter)
. 286
Conclusion
. 291
EXPERT ECONOMIC EVIDENCE IN EUROPEAN COMPETITION
LAW CASES: SOME PERSONAL VIEWS
. 293
Introduction
. 293
I. Why does economics have a role in competition law?
. 295
II. What constitutes a good economic submission?
. 297
III. "Economic evidence" or "economic opinion"?
. 299
IV. The impact of economics on legal certainty
. 301
V. What does "market testing" tells us about the ability of judges
and competition authorities to assess "complex economic
analysis"?
. 303
EXPERT ECONOMIC EVIDENCE AND EFFECTS-BASED
ASSESSMENTS IN COMPETITION LAW CASES
. 305
Introduction
. 305
I. Expert economic evidence or expert economic argument?
. 305
II. The role of economics and of effects-based assessments in
competition law
. 306
A. The conquest of competition law by economics
. 306
B. The role of economics in the design of legal rules
. 308
С
The role of economics in the enforcement of legal rules:
the tension between legal certainty and effects-based
assessments
. 309
Conclusion
. 311
11
table
of
contents
Pages
SPECIALISED
COMPETITION COURTS,
CHAMBERS AND
JUDGES:
STATE
OF PLAY
IN FRANCE
. 313
Introduction
. 313
I. Current legal framework in competition matters:
concentration and specialisation
. 314
A. The power of sanction given to the Competition Council, an
administrative body, placed under judicial court control.
. 314
B. In civil litigation, specialisation and concentration for both
anticompetitive and restrictive practices
. 315
II. Specialisation in practice
. 316
A. Specialised courts, laboratories for the making of law in
modern economies?
. 316
B. Remaining questions: a principle of exception implying
limits in application
—,
a rule of coordination still to come
316
1.
The application of the rule of specialisation to the
defense, when based on competition law
. 316
2.
The case of a mixture of competition law, IP rights and
contracts law
. 317
3.
The case of interim measures
. 317
C. What about coordination?
. 318
1.
The other way round: keeping the case
.
with recourse
to Amicus curiae
. 318
2.
Developing specialised networks
. 319
3.
The res judicata issue, still unresolved in France
. 319
Conclusion
. 319
THE NATIONAL COURT SYSTEMS' ROLE IN ADJUDICATION
OF COMPETITION LAW CASES
—
EUROPEAN AND SWEDISH
ASPECTS
. 321
Abstract
. 321
Introduction
. 321
I. The costs of enforcement
. 322
II. How should we ensure consistency and timeliness?
. 323
III. Should we go for specialist or
generalist
courts?
. 324
IV. Should judges be competition law specialists or generalists?
325
12 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author2 | Merola, Massimo Derenne, Jacques |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | m m mm j d jd |
| author_GND | (DE-588)171247280 (DE-588)1033173622 |
| author_facet | Merola, Massimo Derenne, Jacques |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV040881328 |
| classification_rvk | PS 2960 |
| classification_tum | JUR 395f |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)801752833 (DE-599)BVBBV040881328 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV040881328</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241028</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130314s2012 be |||| 10||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9782802735663</subfield><subfield code="c">(pbk.) : 60,00 EUR</subfield><subfield code="9">978-2-8027-3566-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)801752833</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV040881328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">be</subfield><subfield code="c">BE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 2960</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139745:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">JUR 395f</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Massimo Merola, Jacques Derenne</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bruxelles</subfield><subfield code="b">Bruylant</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">326 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Global Competition Law Centre</subfield><subfield code="v">2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GCLC Annual Conference series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kartellrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4029788-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kartellrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4029788-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Merola, Massimo</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)171247280</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Derenne, Jacques</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1033173622</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Global Competition Law Centre</subfield><subfield code="v">2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV040948110</subfield><subfield code="9">2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025861082&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025861082</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Konferenzschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV040881328 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-10-28T19:00:13Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9782802735663 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025861082 |
| oclc_num | 801752833 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-703 DE-M382 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-703 DE-M382 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 326 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Bruylant |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Global Competition Law Centre |
| series2 | Global Competition Law Centre GCLC Annual Conference series |
| spelling | The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases edited by Massimo Merola, Jacques Derenne Bruxelles Bruylant 2012 326 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Global Competition Law Centre 2 GCLC Annual Conference series Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd rswk-swf Kartellrecht (DE-588)4029788-3 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift gnd-content Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 b Kartellrecht (DE-588)4029788-3 s DE-604 Merola, Massimo (DE-588)171247280 edt Derenne, Jacques (DE-588)1033173622 edt Global Competition Law Centre 2 (DE-604)BV040948110 2 Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025861082&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases Global Competition Law Centre Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Kartellrecht (DE-588)4029788-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5103273-9 (DE-588)4029788-3 (DE-588)1071861417 |
| title | The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases |
| title_auth | The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases |
| title_exact_search | The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases |
| title_full | The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases edited by Massimo Merola, Jacques Derenne |
| title_fullStr | The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases edited by Massimo Merola, Jacques Derenne |
| title_full_unstemmed | The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases edited by Massimo Merola, Jacques Derenne |
| title_short | The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in competition law cases |
| title_sort | the role of the court of justice of the european union in competition law cases |
| topic | Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Kartellrecht (DE-588)4029788-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäischer Gerichtshof Kartellrecht Konferenzschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025861082&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV040948110 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT merolamassimo theroleofthecourtofjusticeoftheeuropeanunionincompetitionlawcases AT derennejacques theroleofthecourtofjusticeoftheeuropeanunionincompetitionlawcases |