Who was King? Who was not King?: the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Prague
Inst. of Archaeology, Acad. of Sciences of the Czech Republic
2010
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Physical Description: | XVI, 161 S. Ill., Kt. |
| ISBN: | 9788087365373 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV039868140 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20120627 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 120206s2010 ab|| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788087365373 |9 978-80-87365-37-3 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)774492366 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ356438325 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-188 |a DE-20 |a DE-19 |a DE-M515 |a DE-M157 |a DE-355 | ||
| 084 | |a NG 2050 |0 (DE-625)125423: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Who was King? Who was not King? |b the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East |c Petr Charvát ... (eds.) |
| 264 | 1 | |a Prague |b Inst. of Archaeology, Acad. of Sciences of the Czech Republic |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a XVI, 161 S. |b Ill., Kt. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a König |0 (DE-588)4031516-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Mesopotamien |0 (DE-588)4038788-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Mesopotamien |0 (DE-588)4038788-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a König |0 (DE-588)4031516-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Charvát, Petr |d 1949-2023 |0 (DE-588)142472441 |4 edt | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024727536&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024727536 | ||
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804148808656879616 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENT
CONTENT
/
INHALT
/
TABLE
DE MATIERES
WHO WAS
KING?
WHO WAS NOT
KING?
(PETR
CHARVAT -
PETRA
MARIKOVA VLCKOVA - LUKAS
PECHA)
VII
LIST
OF
ABBREVIATIONS
/ ABKUERZUNGSVERZEICHNIS / ABREVIATIONS UTILISEES IX
LIST
OF
TABLES
AND
FIGURES
/
TABELLEN-
UND
ABBILDUNGENVERZEICHNIS
/
LISTE
DES
TABLEAUX
ET
FIGURES
XV
CHAPTER
1
THE
POOR
ARE THE
SILENT ONES
IN THE
COUNTRY .
ON THE
LOSS
OF
LEGITIMACY;
CHALLENGING
POWER
IN
EARLY
MESOPOTAMIA
(GEBHARD J. SELZ)
1
MODERN
HISTORIANS OF ANCIENT
MESOPOTAMIA
ARE CHIEFLY CONCERNED
WITH
THE DEEDS OF THE KINGS
AND
MAINLY
USE SOURCES
WHICH
REFLECT CONDITIONS AT THE APEX OF
MESOPOTAMIAN
SOCIETY. THIS
PAPER ATTEMPTS TO INVESTIGATE POSSIBLE
TRACES
OF DISCONTENT AND OPPOSITION AS
WELL
AS THE
CRITERIA
INVOLVING
THE LOSS OF THE LEGITIMACY OF
POWER
IN
EARLY
MESOPOTAMIA.
WE
WILL
DEAL
WITH
TWO
MAJOR TYPES OF SOURCES: THE
EARLY
CURSE
FORMULAS
IN
ROYAL
INSCRIPTIONS,
AND THE SCHOOL-BASED
TRADITION
OF
SUMERIAN PROVERBS.
ESPECIALLY
THE LATTER
ALLOW
FOR A MORE
SOCIALLY-BALANCED
UNDER
STANDING
OF
HISTORY.
CHAPTER
2
THE
EARLIEST
HISTORY
OF THE KINGDOM OF
KIS (PETR CHARVDT)
16
A
BLACK-STONE BAS-RELIEF
FROM
KIS,
DATING
PROBABLY
TO THE
URUK
IV-III
PERIOD,
SHOWS A
SCENE
INTER
PRETED,
WITH
RECOURSE TO AN EARLIER IMAGE DOCUMENTED ON ONE OF THE SEALINGS FROM SUSA
B {= SUSA
ACROPOLE
27-23)
AS
DEPICTING
A
SYMBOLIC
TRANSFER OF
POLITICAL
POWER.
THE
POSSIBILITY
OF A
LEGITIMIZA
TION
OF THE EARLIEST
KINGDOM
OF
KISH
FROM A SOURCE OTHER THAN THE
URUK-AGE
URUK
POLITY
IS CONSI
DERED,
AND
THE POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF
SUCH
AN ACT ARE
WEIGHED
AGAINST THE TESTIMONY OF
WRITTEN
SOURCES OF THE
ED
1-111
PERIOD.
CHAPTER
3
REPRESENTATION ET LEGITIMATION DU
POUVOIR
ROYAL
AUX EPOQUES
NEO-SUMERIENNE ET
AMORRITE
(BERTRAND LAFONT)
23
DANS
LA
HAUTE
HISTOIRE
DU
PROCHE-ORIENT
ANCIEN, L IMAGE QU OFFRE
L INSTITUTION
ROYALE EST COMPLEXE
ET VARIEE.
LE
TITRE MEME
DE
LUGAL
,
ROI ,
EST SUSCEPTIBLE
D AVOIR
ETE INTERPRETE DE
DIVERSES
FACONS.
CET
ARTICLE VISE A MONTRER QUE, ENTRE LES DEUX PERIODES
D UR
NEO-SUMERIENNE ET DE
MARI
AMORRITE
(FIN
DU
III
E
MILLENAIRE - DEBUT DU IP MILLENAIRE AVANT NOTRE ERE), LE FIL DE
CERTAINES TRADITIONS
TOU
CHANT A
L INSTITUTION
ROYALE ET A LA CONCEPTION QU ON EN AVAIT NE FUT JAMAIS COMPLETEMENT
INTER
ROMPU,
MALGRE LA DIFFERENCE DES
CONTEXTES
GEOGRAPHIQUE ET
SOCIO-HISTORIQUE.
PLUSIEURS
EXEMPLES
SONT
PRIS
DANS LES DOCUMENTATIONS DE L EPOQUE
D UR
III ET DE CELLE
DU
TEMPS DES ROIS AMORRITES DE
MARI
: PERSISTANCE DE L HERITAGE CULTUREL SUMERIEN, SACRALISATION DE LA
PERSONNE DU
ROI,
ELECTION
DIVINE
DU
SOUVERAIN,
ATTRIBUTS
ROYAUX,
ROLE
SYMBOLIQUE
DES EQUIDES.
III
CONTENT
CHAPTER
4
HISTORY
AND
IDEOLOGY
IN THE OLD
BABYLONIAN
YEAR
NAMES
(LUKAS
PECHA)
38
THE YEAR NAMES OF
OLD
BABYLONIAN
KINGS
REPRESENT A
VERY USEFUL
SOURCE OF
INFORMATION
NOT
ONLY
ON THE
CONTEMPORARY
ROYAL
IDEOLOGY, BUT ALSO ON SOME HISTORICAL
EVENTS
THAT WERE MENTIONED IN
THOSE TEXTS.
IN
THIS
CONTRIBUTION,
THE YEAR NAMES ISSUED BY THE
KINGS
OF
ISIN, LARSA
AND
BABYLON ARE COMPARED. THERE
ARE MARKED DISTINCTIONS AMONG THE YEAR NAMES OF THE
THREE
DYNASTIES
WITH
REGARD TO THE NATURE OF
EVENTS
MENTIONED
IN
THEM. IN THE YEAR NAMES OF
ISIN
DYNASTY,
THERE
ARE
VIRTUALLY
NO ALLUSIONS TO
WARS,
WHEREAS
BOTH THE DYNASTIES OF
LARSA
AND BABYLON RELATIVELY FREQUENTLY MENTION
MILITARY
SUCCESSES.
THE YEAR
NAMES OF BABYLON, UNLIKE
THOSE
OF ISIN AND LARSA, CONTAIN NO MENTIONS OF APPOINTMENT OF CULTIC
PERSONNEL BY THE
KING.
FURTHER, IN THE YEAR NAMES OF THE LARSA DYNASTY, LEGAL ACTIVITY OF THE
KINGS IS
COMPLETELY OMITTED, WHILE IN THE YEAR NAMES OF ISIN AND BABYLON SUCH
DEEDS OCCASIONALLY FIGURE.
BESIDES, AN INTERESTING DEVELOPMENT CAN BE OBSERVED
DURING
THE REIGN OF THE DYNASTY OF
BABYLON.
IN
THE
LATE
OLD
BABYLONIAN
PERIOD,
THE NUMBER OF DEDICATIONS OF
VOTIVE
OBJECTS
CONSTANTLY RISES WHEREAS
LARGE
BUILDING
PROJECTS
AND
MILITARY
EVENTS
ARE MENTIONED
LESS
FREQUENTLY. THIS CAN PERHAPS BE UNDER
STOOD AS A REFLECTION OF THE GRADUAL DECLINE OF THE
OLD
BABYLONIAN
STATE.
CHAPTER
5
KOENIG
HAMMURAPI
UND DIE
BABYLONIER:
WEM UEBERTRUG
DER
KODEX
HAMMURAPI
DIE
RECHTSPFLEGE?
(WALTHER SALLABERGER)
46
HAMMURAPI
VON BABYLON SCHUF
SEINE
GESETZE FUER DIE MENSCHEN
SEINES
LANDES, VERTRETEN DURCH
IHRE GOETTER, ANLAESSLICH DER
NEUORDNUNG
DES REICHS. ES STELLT SICH DIE FRAGE, WIE DAS IM
KODEX
HAM
MURAPI
FESTGELEGTE
RECHT WEITERHIN GEPFLEGT UND ERHALTEN WERDEN SOLLTE. DER EPUEOG SCHEINT
DIESE
AUFGABE DEM NACHFOLGER
ZUZUWEISEN,
DOCH LASSEN SICH IN DEN RECHTLICHEN REGELUNGEN
SELBST
DREI
ZENTRALE
PRINZIPIEN
ERKENNEN: 1.) DAS
SCHRIFDICHKEITSPRINZIP
BEI RECHTSGESCHAEFTEN, 2.)
DIE
VERPFLICH
TUNG
DES EINZELNEN ZUR GESELLSCHAFTLICHEN VERANTWORTUNG UND 3.) DIE
FUERSORGEPFLICHT DER STAEDTI
SCHEN INSTITUTIONEN GEGENUEBER DEM
INDIVIDUUM.
DAS RECHTSWESEN ERFORDERT
UND
FOERDERT ALSO EINE
AUTARKE
ORDNUNG
IN DER
ZIVILGESELLSCHAFT,
IM
PRINZIP
ZUNAECHST UNABHAENGIG
VOM
JEWEILIGEN KOENIG
TUM.
DEM PALAST WERDEN DABEI JURISTISCHE GRENZEN
SEINES
HANDELNS GEZOGEN, SO DASS DIE GESETZE
HAMMURAPIS
AUCH NICHT ZU EINER STAERKUNG VON ELITEN AUS DEM
UMFELD
DES PALASTES FUEHREN.
CHAPTER
6
THE
DAUGHTERS
OF THE
KINGS
OF
BABYLON
AND
THEIR
ROLE
IN
THE OLD
BABYLONIAN
ECONOMY
AND
SOCIETY
(WITOLD
TYBOROWSKI)
59
A
VERY INTERESTING
FACT
CONNECTED
WITH
THE
NADITUM
PRIESTESSES
OF
SAMAS
IN SIPPAR IS THAT ONE CAN
FIND
DAUGHTERS OF THE KINGS OF BABYLON AMONG THEM. FORMALLY THEY WERE
ORDINARY
PRIESTESSES
AND
SURELY THEY PERFORMED THE
SAME
DUTIES AS THE OTHER WOMEN OF THAT PROFESSION. APART FROM THAT AS
MANY OTHER
NADITUM,
THE KING S DAUGHTERS POSSESSED LAND AND OTHER COMMODITIES WHICH WERE
NECESSARY
FOR THEIR
LIVING
AND
LIKE
THE OTHER
PRIESTESSES
THEY
DID
BUSINESS TO MAKE
PROFIT
WITH
IT.
ONE
MIGHT
EXPECT
ALSO, THAT THE
PRESENCE
AND
ACTIVITY
OF THE BABYLONIAN PRINCESSES
IN
DIE SIPPAR CLOISTER
MIGHT BE SIGNIFICANT SOMEHOW AND IT MIGHT BE AN INFORMAL
LINK
BETWEEN THE PALACE AND THE CLERGY
AND
THE CITY. HOWEVER, THE ANALYSIS OF DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ACTIVITY OF
THE PRINCESSES SHOWS
THAT THIS
DID
NOT HAPPEN AND ESPECIALLY ILTANI, DAUGHTER OF
ABL-ESUH
MIGHT HAVE SEPARATED HERSELF
FROM
THE OTHER
NADITUM
AND FROM THE CLERGY OF THE
SAMAS
TEMPLE AND CLOISTER. THUS HER
LIFE
IN
SIPPAR
DID
NOT HAVE ANY MAJOR SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE SOCIAL LIFE OF THE LOCAL
COMMUNITY.
CHAPTER
7
TO BE KING, OR NOT TO BE KING, OR MUCH ADO
ABOUT
NOTHING?
THE
CONCEPT
OF
ROYALTY
IN THE
AMARNA
CORRESPONDENCE
(JANA
MYNAROVA) 71
IT HAS ALREADY BEEN CONFIRMED BY A
SERIES
OF STUDIES THAT THE CORPUS OF THE
AMARNA
LETTERS, DATED
TO THE MIDDLE OF THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY
BCE,
CAN BE CONSIDERED A SET OF DIPLOMATIC DOCUMENTS
IN ALL
ASPECTS
ENTAILED IN THIS EXPRESSION. THIS CORPUS OF
LETTERS
IS
HENCE
CLOSELY RELATED TO THE
STAGE
IV
CONTENT
OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS. BUT WHO WAS (A)
KING
IN THE AMARNA CORRESPONDENCE? BASED ON THE
TEX
TUAL
ANALYSIS IT IS OBVIOUS
THAT
THE POLITICAL AND SOCIAL DEPENDENCY OF THE LOCAL KINGLETS OF SYRIA-
PALESTINE UPON THE
KING
OF EGYPT IS EVIDENT NOT ONLY FROM THEIR FREQUENT PLEAS FOR HELP BUT
UNAMBIGUOUSLY ALSO FROM THE MANNER
IN
WHICH
THE PHARAOH IS
IDENTIFIED.
IT IS THE AIM OF THIS STUDY
TO DISCUSS SEVERAL
ASPECTS
OF THE KING S ADDRESS
ATTESTED
IN THE RESPECTIVE BODIES OF THE AMARNA
LETTERS.
CHAPTER
8
WER WAR DER
(ERSTE
UGARITISCHE)
KOENIG?
(PAVEL
CECH)
85
ANTIKE
KOENIGSLISTEN WERDEN IN DER
ALTORIENTALISTIK
- MIT DER AUSNAHME DER ANGABEN, DIE SICH SOL
CHER
DEUTUNG DURCH
ENTSTELLTE
NAMEN ODER GEKUENSTELTE LEBENSDAUERANGABEN VOM HAUS AUS
WIDERSTREBEN - HAUPTSAECHLICH ALS HISTORISCHE QUELLEN
ANGESEHEN
UND
GEWERTET.
ABER MANCHMAL
DIENEN DIE KOENIGSLISTEN PRIMAER KEINEN HISTORIOGRAPHISCHEN ODER
CHRONOGRAPHISCHEN ZWECKEN,
SONDERN SIND
EHER
AUSDRUCK
POLITISCHER THEOLOGIE UND DESHALB OBJEKT DER SOZIOLINGUISTIK. AUF
DEM BEISPIEL DER UGARITISCHEN KOENIGSLISTE
WIRD
DARGESTELLT,
DASS
IHRE ERSTEN NAMEN SOG. CHARAK-
TONYME
SIND,
WELCHE DIE UGARITISCHE GRUENDUNGSLEGENDE WIDERGEBEN, SOMIT DIE STELLUNG
DES
STADT
STAATES
IN DER REGION DEFINIEREN UND ZUGLEICH
MITTEL
ZUR LOESUNG POTENZIELLER PROBLEME ENTWERFEN.
DIE
IN DIESEN CHARAKTONYMEN VERSCHLUESSELTE NACHRICHT KANN UNTER UMSTAENDEN
AUF DER GEOGRA
PHISCHEN, HISTORIOGRAPHISCHEN, MYTHOLOGISCHEN ODER ANDEREN
EBENE
GELESEN
WERDEN, WAS DURCH
STRUKTURELLE AEHNLICHKEITEN ZUR ALTTESTAMENTLICHEN UND ANDEREN
GRUENDUNGSERZAEHLUNGEN VERAN-
SCHAUNLICHT
WIRD.
CHAPTER
9
JEHU,
THE KING OF
ISRAEL
WHO
REPAID
AND
PAID.
LAST
KING
OF
OMRIDE
DYNASTY
ACCORDING
TO
NEO-ASSYRIAN,
ARAMAEAN
AND
BIBLICAL
HISTORIOGRAPHY
(FILIP
CAPEK)
95
KING
JEHU
(842-815
BCE), THE RULER OF THE NORTHERN ISRAEL, IS ACCORDING TO 2 KINGS 9-11
RESPONSIBLE
FOR A
COUP
D ETAT
AND FOR THE SLAUGHTER OF TWO KINGS, NAMELY THE
ISRAELITE
JEHORAM AND JUDEAN
AHAZIAH.
MOREOVER, THE
KILLING
OF JEHORAM ENTAILS THE VERY END OF THE INFLUENTIAL OMRIDE DYNASTY.
THIS CONTRIBUTION TRIES TO
SETTLE
PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE IMAGE OF
JEHU
PROVIDED BY EXTERNAL,
NON-BIBLICAL
EVIDENCE, WHICH MAKES KING S IMAGE FAR FROM UNAMBIGUOUS. NEO-ASSYRIAN
DOCU
MENTS
(COS
2.113D,
COS
2.113E,
AND COS
2.113F)
DEPICT
JEHU
AS A WEAK RULER AT THE MARGIN OF
THE EXPANDING
ASSYRIAN
EMPIRE, WHOSE
EXISTENCE
IS DETERMINED BY
SALMANESER
III
(858-824
BCE)
AND THE
ARAMAIC
TEL DAN INSCRIPTION (COS 2.39)
ASCRIBES
THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE TERMINATION OF
THE TWO KINGS MENTIONED ABOVE TO THE ARAMAEAN
KING
HAZAEL
(842-805
BCE) AND NOT TO JEHU. WHO
WAS THEN
JEHU
IN REALITY, WHAT WAS HIS RELATION TO THE OMRIDES, AND WHAT
FORCES
STOOD BEHIND THE
LITERARY CONSTRUCTION OF HIS BIBLICAL PORTRAYAL?
CHAPTER
10
ADAD-SUMU-USUR
AND HIS
FAMILY
IN THE
SERVICE
OF
ASSYRIAN
KINGS
(KATEFINA
SASKOVA) 113
FROM
NEO-ASSYRIAN PERIOD,
THERE
IS PRESERVED A NUMBER OF
TEXTS
DEALING
WITH
DIFFERENT
ASPECTS
OF
ASSYRIAN
SCHOLARSHIP.
A
HUGE AMOUNT OF
THESE
TEXTS
RELATED TO SCHOLARS AT THE
ASSYRIAN
ROYAL COURT
DATE BACK
TO THE RELATIVELY SHORT PERIOD OF TIME, FROM THE REIGN OF KINGS
ESARHADDON AND
ASSURBA-
NIPAL,
HOWEVER, IT IS HIGHLY PROBABLE
THAT
EVEN THE OTHER NEO-ASSYRIAN KINGS REGULARLY RECEIVED
REPORTS AND
LETTERS
FROM THEIR SCHOLARS. ASSYRIAN ROYAL SCHOLARS WERE VERY
RESPECTABLE
AND
WELL-
EDUCATED PERSONS. BESIDES OBVIOUS KNOWLEDGE OF READING AND
WRITING,
THESE
PEOPLE MASTERED ONE
OF THE IMPORTANT DISCIPLINES OF MESOPOTAMIAN LEARNING, NEVERTHELESS,
THEIR EDUCATION WAS
MUCH
BROADER AND CONTAINED KNOWLEDGE OF MANY OTHER FIELDS. IT IS EVIDENT
THAT
SCHOLARS WERE
INDISPENSABLE PERSONS AT THE ROYAL COURT. THEY USED TO LOOK
AFTER
THE RULER
WITHIN
THEIR DISCIPLINE
IN
WHICH THEY WERE EDUCATED. HOWEVER, THEY ALSO USED TO
FULFIL
TASKS
WHICH WERE RELATED TO THEIR
FIELD
ONLY
VERY
LITTLE
OR NOT AT
ALL.
FROM THE PRESERVED
TEXTS
IT IS APPARENT
THAT
THE IMPORTANT OFFICES
V
CONTENT
IN
THE KING S
VICINITY
WERE SHARED
ONLY
BY SOME
PRIVILEGED
FAMILIES AND
FAMILY
RELATIONS INSIDE THE
GROUP
OF
KING S
CLOSEST
SCHOLARS ARE DOCUMENTED VERY FREQUENTLY THE FAMILY OF
ADAD-SUMU-USUR
IS
LIKELY
TO
BE THE
MOST SIGNIFICANT EXAMPLE,
BECAUSE
MEMBERS OF THIS FAMILY EVIDENTLY USED
TO
WORK
IN THE SERVICE OF
ASSYRIAN
KINGS FOR NEARLY 250 YEARS.
CHAPTER
11
THE
RULERS
AND
THE
RULED
IN
ACHAEMENID
ART
(MICHAEL ROAF)
131
THE
ROYAL
MONUMENTS OF THE
ACHAEMENID
PERSIAN DYNASTY ILLUSTRATE THE RULER AND THE
RULED,
I.E. THE
KING
AND HIS
SUBJECTS,
WHO
ARE
DEPICTED
AS
REPRESENTATIVES OR DELEGATIONS OF DISTINCT PEOPLES.
CURRENT
SCHOLARSHIP CONSIDERS THAT
THESE
ILLUSTRATIONS INDICATE AN IDEOLOGY OF PERSIAN KINGSHIP
RADICALLY
DIFFERENT FROM THAT
OF
EARLIER AND LATER EMPIRES, NAMELY ONE IN WHICH
THERE
EXISTED
A MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL, HARMONIOUS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
THE
RULER AND
THE
RULED. A RECENTLY
PUBLISHED
ARTICLE HAS SUGGESTED THAT IN THE DELEGATIONS OF
SUBJECT
PEOPLES IT IS POSSIBLE TO IDENTIFY
AND,
IN SOME
CASES,
NAME BOTH SATRAPS AND KINGS, WHO MIGHT
BE
THOUGHT OF AS RULERS AMONG
THE RULED. THIS CHAPTER DISCUSSES
THESE
PROPOSALS AND
REACHES
THE
CONCLUSION THAT NEITHER
OF
THEM
IS
SUPPORTED BY THE AVAILABLE EVIDENCE.
CHAPTER
12
THE
PORTRAIT
OF
NABONIDUS
AND
CYRUS
IN
THEIR
(?)
CHRONICLE.
WHEN
AND WHY
THE
PRESENT
VERSION
WAS
COMPOSED
(STEFAN ZAWADZKI)
142
SCHOLARS REGARD THE NABONIDUS CHRONICLE
AS
ONE
OF
THE MOST IMPORTANT SOURCES FOR THE RECON
STRUCTION
OF
THE REIGN
OF
NABONIDUS,
BUT
THERE
HAS BEEN
A
LACK
OF
THE REQUISITE CONTEMPLATION
CONCERNING THE
MESSAGE
IT CONTAINS, AND OF DISCUSSION REGARDING THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER
WHICH
THE PRESENT VERSION,
WITH
ITS
MESSAGE,
WAS COMPOSED. THE ARGUMENT PUT FORWARD IN THE ARTICLE
SUGGESTS
THAT FUNDAMENTAL
CHANGES
WERE MADE
TO THE
ORIGINAL
TEXT
OF
THE CHRONICLE SOON
AFTER
THE
FALL
OF BABYLON IN 539 BC,
AS
A RESULT OF
WHICH
THE MOST POSITIVE FIGURE IN THE CHRONICLE IS NOT
NABONIDUS
BUT CYRUS.
INDEX
155
VI
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author2 | Charvát, Petr 1949-2023 |
| author2_role | edt |
| author2_variant | p c pc |
| author_GND | (DE-588)142472441 |
| author_facet | Charvát, Petr 1949-2023 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV039868140 |
| classification_rvk | NG 2050 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)774492366 (DE-599)BSZ356438325 |
| discipline | Geschichte |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01455nam a22003492c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV039868140</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20120627 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120206s2010 ab|| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788087365373</subfield><subfield code="9">978-80-87365-37-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)774492366</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ356438325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M515</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M157</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NG 2050</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)125423:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Who was King? Who was not King?</subfield><subfield code="b">the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East</subfield><subfield code="c">Petr Charvát ... (eds.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Prague</subfield><subfield code="b">Inst. of Archaeology, Acad. of Sciences of the Czech Republic</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVI, 161 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill., Kt.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">König</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4031516-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mesopotamien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038788-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mesopotamien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038788-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">König</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4031516-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Charvát, Petr</subfield><subfield code="d">1949-2023</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)142472441</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024727536&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024727536</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| geographic | Mesopotamien (DE-588)4038788-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Mesopotamien |
| id | DE-604.BV039868140 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:13:01Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788087365373 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024727536 |
| oclc_num | 774492366 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-188 DE-20 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-M515 DE-M157 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-188 DE-20 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-M515 DE-M157 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | XVI, 161 S. Ill., Kt. |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | Inst. of Archaeology, Acad. of Sciences of the Czech Republic |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Who was King? Who was not King? the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East Petr Charvát ... (eds.) Prague Inst. of Archaeology, Acad. of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2010 XVI, 161 S. Ill., Kt. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier König (DE-588)4031516-2 gnd rswk-swf Mesopotamien (DE-588)4038788-4 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Mesopotamien (DE-588)4038788-4 g König (DE-588)4031516-2 s DE-604 Charvát, Petr 1949-2023 (DE-588)142472441 edt SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024727536&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Who was King? Who was not King? the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East König (DE-588)4031516-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4031516-2 (DE-588)4038788-4 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | Who was King? Who was not King? the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East |
| title_auth | Who was King? Who was not King? the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East |
| title_exact_search | Who was King? Who was not King? the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East |
| title_full | Who was King? Who was not King? the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East Petr Charvát ... (eds.) |
| title_fullStr | Who was King? Who was not King? the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East Petr Charvát ... (eds.) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Who was King? Who was not King? the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East Petr Charvát ... (eds.) |
| title_short | Who was King? Who was not King? |
| title_sort | who was king who was not king the rulers and the ruled in the ancient near east |
| title_sub | the rulers and the ruled in the ancient Near East |
| topic | König (DE-588)4031516-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | König Mesopotamien Aufsatzsammlung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024727536&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT charvatpetr whowaskingwhowasnotkingtherulersandtheruledintheancientneareast |