The UNCITRAL arbitration rules: a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules)
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2013
|
| Ausgabe: | second editon |
| Schriftenreihe: | Oxford commentaries on international law
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | LXXXI, 1048 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9780199696307 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV039152531 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190117 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 110721s2013 xxk |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780199696307 |c Hardback: GBP 237.00, EUR 284.69 (DE) |9 978-0-19-969630-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)745518042 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV039152531 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
| 049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-20 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-19 |a DE-384 |a DE-M382 |a DE-29 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K2400 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.5/22 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PT 350 |0 (DE-625)139874: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PU 1555 |0 (DE-625)139930: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Caron, David D. |d 1952-2018 |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1032640855 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The UNCITRAL arbitration rules |b a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules) |c David Caron, Lee M. Caplan |
| 250 | |a second editon | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Oxford University Press |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a LXXXI, 1048 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Oxford commentaries on international law | |
| 610 | 1 | 4 | |a Iran-United States Claims Tribunal |
| 610 | 1 | 4 | |a Nations Unies - Commission pour le droit commercial international - Règlement d'arbitrage de la C.N.U.D.C.I |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United Nations Commission on International Trade Law |t UNCITRAL arbitration rules |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Vereinte Nationen |t UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules |0 (DE-588)4684680-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitrage (Droit) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitrage international | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationale arbitrage |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Réclamations | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Verdragen |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitration and award | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitration, International | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Claims | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Iran-United States Claims Tribunal | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4132605-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4136710-8 |a Kommentar |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4132605-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Vereinte Nationen |t UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules |0 (DE-588)4684680-3 |D u |
| 689 | 1 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Caplan, Lee M. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Vereinte Nationen |b Commission on International Trade Law |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)14685-7 |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024170291&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024170291 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804147997040181248 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | IMAGE 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CASES AND OTHER PRACTICE XXVII
TABLE OF INSTRUMENTS LIX
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS LXXXIII
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL PROCESS AND THE WORK OF UNCITRAL 2
3. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNCITRAL RULES OF PROCEDURE 3
A. THE DRAFTING OF THE 1976 RULES 3
B. THE UNCITRAL RULES AND THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 4
(1) THE ORIGINS AND STRUCTURE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 4
(2) THE TRIBUNAL S USE OF THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES 5
C. THE UNCITRAL RULES AND THE 1985 UNCITRAL MODEL LAW 6
D. ADOPTION OF THE UNCITRAL RULES IN OTHER PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
INSTITUTIONS 6 E. INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION AND THE UNCITRAL RULES 7
F. THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULES 8
G. THE WORK OF UNCITRAL ON RULES FOR TRANSPARENCY IN INVESTOR-STATE
ARBITRATION 9
4. HOW TO USE THIS COMMENTARY 10
A. NAVIGATING THE TEXT 10
B. THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN THE 1976 RULES AND 2010 RULES IN APPLICATION
AND INTERPRETATION 10
C. THE EXTRACTS 10
D. FURTHER RESEARCH 11
5. CONCLUSION 11
PART I: FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND THE
LEGAL FRAMEWORK WITHIN WHICH THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL OPERATES
INTRODUCTION 13
CHAPTER 2: SCOPE OF APPLICATION, GENERAL PROVISIONS,
AND PLACE OF ARBITRATION
1. INTRODUCTION 16
2. SCOPE OF APPLICATION-ARTICLE 1 16
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 16
B. COMMENTARY 17
(1) GENERAL COMMENTS 17
(2) SCOPE OF APPLICATION 1 8
(3) NO WRITING REQUIREMENT FOR AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATION 1 8
(4) PARTY AUTONOMY AND MODIFICATION OF THE RULES 19
(5) PRESUMPTIVE SCOPE OF APPLICATION 20
IMAGE 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(6) FUTURE TRANSPARENCY RULES FOR INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION 23
O MODEL ARBITRATION CLAUSE 24
(8) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 24
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT AND OTHER TRIBUNALS 26
(1) ARTICLE 1 (1) (1976 RULES)-SCOPE AND MODIFICATION 26
(2) ARTICLE 1(2) (1976 RULES)-NON-DEROGATION FROM MANDATORY LAW 28
GENERAL PROVISIONS-ARTICLE 17 2J
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 29
B. COMMENTARY 3U
(1) BASIC PRINCIPLES-ARTICLE 17(1) 30
(A) ARBITRAL AUTONOMY AND ITS LIMITS 30
(B) CONFIDENTIALITY IN UNCITRAL ARBITRATION 36
(C) NON-DISPUTING PART) (AMICUS) PARTICIPATION IN UNCITRAL ARBITRATION
39 (D) THE NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL
41 (E) CONCLUDING COMMENTS 45
(2) PROVISIONAL TIMETABLE AND MODIFICATION OF TIME PERIODS-ARTICLE 17(2)
46 (A) PROVISIONAL TIMETABLE 46
(B) MODIFICATIONS OF TIME PERIODS 47
(C) ISSUES OT GENERAL APPLICATION 49
(31 RIGHT TO A HEARING-ARTICLE 17(3) 49
(A) SCOPE OR HEARINGS 49
(B) TIMING OF HEARING REQUESTS 51
(C) PRELIMINARY MEETINGS 52
(4) COMMUNICATION OF DOCUMENTS-ARTICLE 17(4) 53
I^) JOINDER OF THIRD PERSONS-ARTICLE 17(5) 54
(6! CONSOLIDATION OF CLAIMS 57
C) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 58
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT AND OTHER TRIBUNALS 59
(1) ARTICLE 15(1) (1976 RULES)-GENERAL 59
(2) ARTICLE 15(1) (19~ 6 RULES)- AMICUS SUBMISSIONS 65
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 69
TLJ GENERAL AND TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 15(1) 69
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 15(2) 74
. PLACE OF ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 18 77
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 77
B. COMMENTARY 78
(1) MEANING OF PLACE OF ARBITRATION 78
T2) SELECTION OR THE PLACE OF ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 18(1) 80
(A) CONSIDERATIONS TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT 80
1) NATURE AND SUITABILITY OF THE LOCAL LAW 81
(2 ENFORCEABILITY OF THE AWARD 85
(3I NEUTRALITY 87
14 PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 89
* B: DECIMON ON PLACE OF ARBITRATION NOT PROCEDURAL: CONSULTATION WITH
THE PARTIES C)|
, I 1 VC HERE THE AWARD IS DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN MADE 92
I -T I IHE LOCATION OF TRIBUNAL DELIBERATIONS AND MEETINGS FOR ANY
OTHER PURPOSE, INCLUDING HEARINGS -ARTICLE 18(2) 93
O COMPARISON TO THE L L )~6 UNCITRAL RULES 95
(. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 96
O. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 109
IMAGE 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS XI
CHAPTER 3: APPLICABLE LAW, AMIABLE COMPOSITEUR
1. INTRODUCTION 111
2. APPLICABLE LAW-ARTICLE 35 112
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 112
B. COMMENTARY 112
(1) THE PRIMARY RULE-ARTICLE 35(1) 112
(A) THE PRINCIPLE OF PARTY AUTONOMY AND ITS APPLICATION 112
(B) CHOICE OF APPLICABLE LAW WHERE NOT DESIGNATED BY THE PARTIES 118 (2)
AMIABLE COMPOSITEUR OI EX AEQUO ET BONO -ARTICLE 35(2) 119
(3) THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CONTRACT AND OF TTADE USAGES-ARTICLE 35(3)
121 (4) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 123
(5) A NOTE ON THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 128
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 129
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 131
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 33(1) 131
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 33(2) 140
(3) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 33(3) 140
(4) OTHER PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 142
PART II: ARBITRAL PROCEDURES TO CONTROL
THE SELECTION AND CONDUCT OF ARBITRATORS
INTRODUCTION 145
CHAPTER 4: THE NUMBER AND SELECTION OF ARBITRATORS
1. INTRODUCTION 148
2. DESIGNATING AND APPOINTING AUTHORITIES-ARTICLE 6 148
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 148
B. COMMENTARY 149
(1) OPPORTUNITIES FOR AGREEMENT ON AN APPOINTING AUTHORITY-ARTICLE 6(1)
149 (2) THE ROLE OF THE DESIGNATING AUTHORITY-ARTICLE 6(2) AND (4) 151
(3) SUSPENSION OF TIME PERIODS IN THE ABSENCE OF AN APPOINTING
AUTHORITY-ARTICLE 6(3) 153
(4) THE ROLE OF THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY-ARTICLE 6(5)-(7) 153
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 155
3. THE NUMBER OF ARBITRATORS-ARTICLE 7 157
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 157
B. COMMENTARY 157
(1) THE DEFAULT RULE ON THE NUMBER OF ARBITRATORS-ARTICLE 7(1) 157 (2)
THE EXCEPTION TO THE DEFAULT RULE OF THREE ARBITRATORS-ARTICLE 7(2) 160
(3) A NUMBER OF ARBITRATORS OTHER THAN ONE OR THREE 161
4. APPOINTMENT OF THE SOLE ARBITRATOR-ARTICLE 8 162
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 162
B. COMMENTARY 163
5. APPOINTMENT OF A THREE-PERSON PANEL-ARTICLE 9 164
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 164
B. COMMENTARY 164
(1) THE RIGHT OFEACH PARTY TO APPOINT AN ARBITRATOR 164
(2) THE APPOINTMENT OF THE PRESIDING ARBITRATOR 165
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 166
IMAGE 4
JJ TABLE OF CONTENTS
6. APPOINTMENT IN MULTI-PARTY ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 10 169
A. TEXTOFTHE2010UNCITRALRULE LB /
169
B. COMMENTARY
Y
(1) IHE REQUIREMENTS FOR APPOINTMENT-ARTICLE 10(1) AND (2) (2) IHE
POWER OF THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY TO APPOINT AND REAPPOINT-ARTICLE 10(3)
1 70
COMPARISON IO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 172
CHAPTER 5: THE CHALLENGE OF ARBITRATORS
1. INTRODUCTION **
A. AN OVERVIEW OF CHALLENGES BEFORE INVESTMENT AND OTHER TRIBUNALS 178
(1) CHALLENGE DECISION OF APRIL 15, 1993 178
(2) CHALLENGE DECISION OF JANUARY 11, 1995 179
(3) CHALLENGE DECISION BY A DIVISION OF THE LCIA-OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2005
179 (41 IHE US GOVERNMENT S CHALLENGE OF PROFESSOR JAMES ANAYA IN THE
GRAND RIVER ARBITRATION-2007 180
T5) IHE ARGENTINE GOVERNMENT S CHALLENGE OF MR JUDD L KESSLER IN THE
NATIONAL GRID ARBITRATION-2007 180
(61 THE ARGENTINE GOVERNMENT S CHALLENGES OF PROFESSOR GABRIELLE
KAUFMANN-KOHLER IN THE AWG GROUP ARBITRATION-2007-2008 181 LA) IHE
ARGENTINE GOVERNMENT S FIRST CHALLENGE-2007 181 (B) SHE ARGENTINE
GOVERNMENT S SECOND CHALLENGE-2008 181 ( T ! THE ARGENTINE GOVERNMENT S
CHALLENGE OF MR STANIMIR ALEXANDROV IN THE
ICS ARBITRATION-2009 182
(8) THE CLAIMANTS CHALLENGE TO MR J CHRISTOPHER THOMAS IN THE GDLLO
ARBITRATION-2009 182
B. AN C )VERVIEW OF THE CHALLENGES BEFORE THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL
183 (1! THE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OF NILS MANGARD-1982 183 (2)
IHE US GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OF JUDGES KASHANI AND SHAFEIEI-1984 184 (3)
IHE HRST IRANIAN GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OFJUDGE BRINER IN CASE NO 55,
AMOIO IRAN AND ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN -1988 184
L4I IHE SECOND IRANIAN GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OFJUDGE BRINER-1989 184 PI
IHE THIRD IRANIAN GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OF JUDGE BRINER-1989 185 L6 I
LIE US CLAIMANTS CHALLENGE OFJUDGE NOORI IN CASE NO 248, CARLSON AND
MELII INDUSTRIAL GROUP- 1990 186
!I THE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OFJUDGE ARANGIO-RUIZ-1991 186 18 I
IHE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT CHALLENGES OFJUDGE KRZYSZTOF SKUHIS/EW SKI-1999
186
I 1 ) IHE US GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OFJUDGE BENA;T BROMS-2001 187 I I (V
IHE U S CLAIMANTS CHALLENGE OFJUDGE BENGT BROMS IN CONNECTION WITH
(. ASE NO 485. FREDERICA LINCOLN RIAHI- 2004 187
1 ! 1 IHE L S (LOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OF JUDGES ASSADOLLAH NOORI,
KOOROSH MELI. AND MOHSEN AGHAHOSSEINI-2005-2006 188
*12 IHE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OFJUDGE KRZYSTOF SKUBISZEWSKI AND
THE L S I LOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OFJUDGE HAMID REZA OLOUMI WDI-200 188
1 3 IHE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OFJUDGE KRZYSTOF SKUBISZEWSKI AND
KIDGE C KKUIIO ARANSJIO-RUIZ-2009 189
. I *( * I HE UN GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OFJUDGE SEYED JAMAL SEIH-2010 190
1 ^. IHE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT CHALLENGE OFJUDGE CHARLES BREWER-2010 190 C
IHE FWHISIVITY OF THE UNCITRAL CHALLENGE PROCEDURE 191
IMAGE 5
TABLE OF CONTENTS XIII
2. THE DUTY TO DISCLOSE-ARTICLE 11 194
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 194
B. COMMENTARY 195
(1) THE DUTY TO DISCLOSE 195
(2) MODEL STATEMENTS OF INDEPENDENCE 198
(3) DISCLOSURE GUIDELINES OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 2 00
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 201
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 2 02
(1) GENERAL 202
(2) DISCLOSURE BY THE US ARBITRATORS 205
3. THE GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE-ARTICLE 12 207
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 2 07
B. COMMENTARY 208
(1) CHALLENGE ON THE GROUND OF JUSTIFIABLE DOUBTS AS TO IMPARTIALITY OR
INDEPENDENCE-GENERAL REMARKS ON ARTICLE 12(1) 208
(A) THE STANDARD FOR IMPARTIALITY AND INDEPENDENCE IS OBJECTIVE 208 (B)
THE SAME STANDARD APPLIES TO PARTY-APPOINTED AND NON-PART) APPOINTED
ARBITRATORS 209
(C) CRITERIA REGARDING AND EXAMPLES OF JUSTIFIABLE DOUBTS 211
(2) CHALLENGE ON THE GROUND OF JUSTIFIABLE DOUBTS AS TO IMPARTIALITY OR
INDEPENDENCE 212
(A) THE MEANING OF IMPARTIALITY AND INDEPENDENCE 213
(B) WHEN ARE DOUBTS AS TO IMPARTIALITY OR INDEPENDENCE JUSTIFIED? 2 13
(1) AN ARBIRRATOR S RELATIONSHIP WITH A WITNESS 215
(2) AN ARBITRATOR S FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PARTY (SHAREHOLDING)
216 (3) AN ARBITRATOR S FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PARTY (SALARY) 2
17 (4) AN ARBITRATOR S PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT BY THE PARENT CORPORATION
OFAPARTY 217
(5) AN ARBITRATOR S REPRESENTATION IN ANOTHER FORUM THAT IS ADVERSE TO A
PARTY 218
(6) AN ARBITRATORS PREVIOUS ADVOCACY ON BEHALF OF A COUNTRY FORMERLY
ADVERSE TO A SOVEREIGN PARTY 218
(7) AN ARBITRATOR S REPRESENTATION OF A THIRD PARRY WITH A RIGHT TO
INTERVENE IN THE PROCEEDINGS 219
(8) AN ARBITRATOR S HANDLING OF THE PROCEEDINGS 220
(9) AN ARBITRATOR S STATEMENT REGARDING A PARTY OR THE DISPUTE 222 (10)
AN ARBITRATOR S DECISION-MAKING 222
(11) AN ARBITRATOR S BREACH OF THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF DELIBERATIONS 223
(12) AN ARBITRATOR S PHYSICAL ASSAULT OF A FELLOW ARBITRATOR 225 (C) THE
STANDARD OF INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY DOES NOT VARY ACCORDING TO THE
STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS 225
(D) A FAILURE TO DISCLOSE UNDER ARTICLE 11 MAY GIVE RISE TO, BUT DOES
NOT PER SE ESTABLISH, JUSTIFIABLE DOUBTS AS TO IMPARRIALITY OR
INDEPENDENCE 226
(E) ARE THERE ANY LIMITATIONS ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY BE USED AS
THE BASIS FOR JUSTIFIABLE DOUBTS? 228
(3) ARTICLE 12(1) AS PROVIDING THE EXCLUSIVE GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE 228
(4) WHEN MAY A PARTY CHALLENGE THE ARBITRATOR IT HAS APPOINTED?-ARTICLE
12(2) 230 C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT AND OTHER
TRIBUNALS 231
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 235
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 10(1) 235
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 10(2) 240
IMAGE 6
X IV TABLE OF CONTENTS
4. THE INITIATION OF THE CHALLENGE AND THE POTENTIAL FOR AGREEMENT TO
THE CHALLENGE-ARTICLE 13 241
A. TEXT OFTHE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 2 41
B. COMMENTARY
(1) WHEN NOTICE OF CHALLENGE MUST BE MADE-ARTICLE 13(1) 2 41
(A) GENERAL COMMENTS ON THE TRAVAUXPREPARATORIES 2 41
(B) WHEN CIRCUMSTANCES BECAME KNOWN TO THE CHALLENGING PARTY 2 43 (1)
BURDEN OF PROOF 2 43
(2) ACTUAL PRIOR KNOWLEDGE 2 45
(2) TO WHOM SHOULD NOTICE BE SENT; WHAT FORM SHOULD NOTICE TAKE;
SUFFICIENCY OF THE NOTICE; WHO MAY SEND NOTICE-ARTICLE 13(2) 2 48
(3) PROCEDURE IF CHALLENGE IS ACCEPTED BY ALL PARTIES OR CHALLENGED
ARBITRATOR WITHDRAWS-ARTICLE 13(3) 2 53
(4) TIMELINE FOR SEEKING A DECISION ON A CHALLENGE-ARTICLE 13(4) 2 56 C.
EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 2 56
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 2 57
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 11(1) 2 57
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 11(2) 2 63
(3) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 11(3) 2 67
5. THE RESOLUTION OF THE CHALLENGE 2 68
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 2 68
B. COMMENTARY 2 68
(1) WHICH AUTHORITY SHALL MAKE THE DECISION ON THE CHALLENGE IF THE
OTHER PARTY DOES NOT AGREE TO THE CHALLENGE OR THE CHALLENGED ARBITRATOR
DOES NOT WITHDRAW? 2 68
(2) NX HEN MAY A PARTY SEEK THE ASSISTANCE OF THE PCA SECRETARY-GENERAL
IN DESIGNATING AN APPOINTING AUTHORITY? 2 70
(3) WHAT PROCEDURES THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY MAY FOLLOW IN DECIDING THE
CHALLENGE 271
(4) LIMITATIONS ON THE POWERS OF THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY 2 72
T,. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 2 72
[), EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 2 73
(U TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 12(1) 2 73
(2! TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 12(2) 2 74
6. COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 274
CHAPTER 6: FAILURE TO ACT, OTHER DISRUPTIONS, AND THE REPLACEMENT OF AN
ARBITRATOR
1. INTRODUCTION 278
2. FAILURE TO ACT AND OTHER DISRUPTIONS-ARTICLE 12(3) 278
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 278
B, COMMENTARY 278
I ! DRAFTING HISTORY OF THE RULE AND GENERAL COMMENTS 278
I,2) [RAN-IS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL PRACTICE WITH RESPECT TO AN ARBITRATOR S
FAILURE TO ACT 280
* .^ IRAN-L S CLAIMS TRIBUNAL PRACTICE WITH RESPECT TO OTHER DISRUPTIONS
282 ;AI A NOTE ON SUBSTITUTE ARBITRATORS 282
; B NOTE ON TRUNCATED PROCEEDINGS 2 83
** 1 * 1 HE ABSENCE OF MR SANI. FALL 1983 2 84
I 2 I IHE ABSENCE OF JUDGE MOSTAFAVI, SPRING 1988 284
. *I THE PRACTICE OF THE TRIBUNAL REGARDING ABSENCE FROM THE HEARING
285
IMAGE 7
TABLE OF CONTENTS XV
(4) THE PRACTICE OF THE TRIBUNAL REGARDING THE RENDERING OF AWARDS
DESPITE A REFUSAL TO SIGN 286
(5) THE PRACTICE OF THE TRIBUNAL REGARDING THE RENDERING OF AWARDS ON
AGREED TERMS DESPITE NO PARTICIPATION BY AN ARBITRATOR 286 (6) THE
PRACTICE OF THE TRIBUNAL REGARDING THE HOLDING OF PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE
DESPITE THE ABSENCE OF AN ARBITRATOR 286
(C) A NOTE ON RESIGNATION OF AN ARBITRATOR 286
(4) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 289
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 289
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 290
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 13(1)-RESIGNATION 290
(2) TRIBUNALRULES (1983), ARTICLE 13(2)-FAILURE TO ACT 291
(3) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 13(3) 302
(4) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 13(4) 302
(5) TRIBUNALRULES (1983), ARTICLE 13(5) 302
3. REPLACEMENT OF AN ARBITRATOR-ARTICLE 14 305
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 305
B. COMMENTARY 305
(1) RATIONALE FOR THE REVISED APPROACH: THE PROBLEM OF SPURIOUS
RESIGNATIONS 305 (2) PROCEDURES WHEN AN ARBITRATOR HAS TO BE
REPLACED -ARTICLE 14(1) 307 (3) REPLACEMENT OF AN ARBITRATOR IN
EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES -ARTICLE 14(2) 308
(A) DEPRIVING A PARTY OF ITS RIGHT TO APPOINT 308
(B) PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS 311
(C) EXCLUSIVITY OF THE DISCRETION OF THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY 312
(D) AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES 313
(4) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 314
(A) THE EXPRESS POWER TO PROCEED 315
(B) THE INHERENT POWER TO PROCEED 317
4. REPETITION OF HEARINGS IN THE EVENT OF REPLACEMENT OF AN
ARBITRATOR-ARTICLE 15 318
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 318
B. COMMENRARY 318
(1) GENERAL COMMENTS 318
(2) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 320
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 322
CHAPTER 7: EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR ARBITRATORS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS
1. INTRODUCTION 325
2. EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR ARBITRATORS AND OTHER KEY ACTORS-ARTICLE
16 325 A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 325
B. COMMENTARY 326
(1) GENERAL 326
(2) PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 330
(3) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 330
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 330
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 331
IMAGE 8
X V ; TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 8: THE INSTITUTION OF THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY
1. EVOLUTION OF THE UNCITRAL APPROACH? 337
2. THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY AND COMPOSITION GENERALLY 338
3. LESSONS FROM THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL FOR THE OFFICE OF THE
APPOINTING AUTHORITY 3 4
PART III: THE INITIATION OF THE ARBITRATION
AND THE IDENTIFICATION AND CLARIFICATION OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED
INTRODUCTION 345
CHAPTER 9: REPRESENTATION AND ASSISTANCE
1. INTRODUCTION 3 4/
2. REPRESENTATION AND ASSISTANCE-ARTICLE 5 347
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 347
B. COMMENTARY 348
(1) THE RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION AND ASSISTANCE BY PERSONS CHOSEN 3 48
(2) COMMUNICATING THE IDENTITY AND ROLE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND ADVISERS
3 51 (3) PROOF OR A REPRESENTATIVE S AUTHORITY 3 52
(4) PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 3 53
(5) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 3 54
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 3 55
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 3 56
CHAPTER 10: THE NOTICE INITIATING ARBITRATION AND THE RESPONSE
1. INTRODUCTION 359
2. THE NOTICE INITIATING ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 3 360
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 360
R. COMMENTARY 361
(1) ILIE REQUIREMENT TO COMMUNICATE A NOTICE OF ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 3(1)
361 12) IHE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS-ARTICLE
3(2) 362 13) MANDATORY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE NOTICE OF
ARBITRATION-ARTICLE M) 363
(*4) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE NOTICE OF
ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 3H) 364
(S) INSUFFICIENCY OF THE NOTICE OF ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 3(5) 3 64
((* ! INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS AND THE NOTICE OF ARBITRATION
365 0 THE NOTICE OF ARBITRATION AT THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 366
IS COMPARISON TO THE 19~6 UNCITRAL RULES 368
I. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 3 69
3. IHE RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE OF ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 4 370
A. TEXT OT THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 370
B. COMMENTARY 370
1 1 * IHE REQUIREMENT TO RESPOND TO THE NOTICE OF ARBITRATION-ARTICLE
4(1) 370 2 * MANDATORY CONTENTS OF THE RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE OF
ARBITRATION-ARTICLE
H L . . 3 72
, L! OPTIONAL CONTENTS OF THE RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE OF
ARBITRATION-ARTICLE
4 : 373
IMAGE 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS XVII
(4) ABSENCE, LATENESS, OR INSUFFICIENCY OF THE RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE OF
ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 4(3) 3 73
(5) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 373
CHAPTER 11: THE CHOICE OF LANGUAGE
1. INTRODUCTION 375
2. THE CHOICE OF LANGUAGE-ARTICLE 19 376
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 376
B. COMMENTARY 376
(1) DETERMINATION OF THE LANGUAGE OF ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 19(1) 376 (2)
TRANSLATION OF DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS-ARTICLE 19(2) 382
(3) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 384
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 384
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 385
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 17(1) 385
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 17(2) 387
CHAPTER 12: NOTICE AND THE CALCULATION OF PERIODS OF TIME
1. INTRODUCTION 393
2. NOTICE AND CALCULATION OF PERIODS OF TIME-ARTICLE 2 394
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 394
B. COMMENTARY 395
(1) WHAT FORM NOTICE MAY TAKE-ARTICLE 2(1) 395
(2) WHEN NOTICE BECOMES EFFECTIVE-ARTICLE 2(2)-(4) 397
(A) A NOTICE IS DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN RECEIVED 397
(B) MEANS OF DELIVERY, INCLUDING BY ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION 399 (1)
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS 400
(C) APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 2(1) OF THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES BY THE
IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 401
(3) HOW TO CALCULATE PERIODS OF TIME UNDER THE RULES-ARTICLE 2(5)-(6)
402 (4) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 403
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 404
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-UNITED STATES CLAIMS TRIBUNAL
404 (1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 2(1) 404
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 2 (2) 405
(3) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 2(3) 405
(4) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 2(4) 407
(5) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 2(5) 407
CHAPTER 13: STATEMENTS OF CLAIM AND DEFENCE
1. INTRODUCTION 409
2. THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM-ARTICLE 20 410
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 410
B. COMMENTARY 411
(1) SUBMISSION OF THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM 411
(2) CONTENTS OF THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM 412
(3) SANCTIONS FOR AN INADEQUATE STATEMENT OF CLAIM 4 14
(4) A NOTE ON THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 415
(5) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 416
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 4 17
IMAGE 10
XVIII TABLE OF CONTENTS
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 4 19
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 18(1) 4 19
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 18(2) 4 19
3. THE STATEMENT OF DEFENCE-ARTICLE 21 4 21
A TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 4 22
B COMMENTARY 4 /Z
(11 SUBMISSION OF THE STATEMENT OF DEFENCE 4 22
(2) CONTENTS OF THE STATEMENT OF DEFENCE 4 23
(3) SUBMISSION OF COUNTERCLAIMS AND CLAIMS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SET-OFF 4
24 (A) CENERAL ISSUES 4 24
(B) THE COUNTERCLAIM OR THE CLAIM FOR A SET-OFF MUST BE WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL 4 26
(4) SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS ON COUNTERCLAIMS AND CLAIMS FOR THE PURPOSE
OF SET-OFF 4 28
(5) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 4 29
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 4 32
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 4 34
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 19(1) 4 34
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 19(2) 4 36
(3) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 19(3) 4 36
(4) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 19(4) 4 47
CHAPTER 14: OBJECTIONS TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL
1. INTRODUCTION 449
2. OBJECTIONS TO JURISDICTION-ARTICLE 23 450
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 450
B. COMMENTARY 450
{ ) [VIE POWER OF THE TRIBUNAL TO DETERMINE ITS OWN JURISDICTION-ARTICLE
23D) 450
(2) OBJECTIONS TO THE EXISTENCE OR VALIDITY OF THE CONTRACT OF WHICH THE
ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IS A PART AND THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY-ARTICLE
23.1) 453
{}) WHEN OBJECTIONS SHOULD BE RAISED-ARTICLE 23(2) 455
(4) WHEN OBJECTIONS SHOULD BE RULED UPON-ARTICLE 23(3) 4 57
N) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 458
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 459
P. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 4 63
(1) TRIBUNALRULES(1983),ARTICIE21(L) 463
12) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 21(2) 463
(3) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 21(3) 464
4) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 21 (4) 464
CHAPTER 15: AMENDMENTS TO THE CLAIM OR DEFENCE
1. INTRODUCTION 4G7
2. AMENDMENTS TO THE CLAIM OR DEFENCE-ARTICLE 22 467
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 467
B. C OMMENRARY 468
!* GENERAL 4 68
- * IHE AMENDMENT MUST NOT RAIL OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARBITRAL
TRIBUNAL
IMAGE 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS XIX
(3) GROUNDS FOR REJECTING AN AMENDMENT: DELAY, PREJUDICE OR OTHER
CIRCUMSTANCES 471
(4) PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS 474
(5) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 475
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 475
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 479
CHAPTER 16: FURTHER WRITTEN STATEMENTS AND TIME LIMITS ON SUBMISSION
1. INTRODUCTION 491
2. FURTHER WRITTEN STATEMENTS-ARTICLE 24 491
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 491
B. COMMENTARY 492
(1) GENERAL COMMENTS 492
(2) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 496
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 496
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 498
3. TIME LIMITS ON SUBMISSION-ARTICLE 25 505
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 505
B. COMMENTARY 505
(1) GENERAL COMMENTS 505
(2) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 508
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 508
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 508
CHAPTER 17: INTERIM MEASURES
1. INTRODUCTION 513
2. INTERIM MEASURES-ARTICLE 26 514
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 514
B. COMMENTARY 515
(1) THE PRECONDITION OF A REQUEST BY A PARRY-ARTICLE 26(1) 516
(2) TYPES OF INTERIM MEASURES THAT MAY BE GRANTED-ARTICLE 26(2) 517 (A)
MAINTAIN OR RESTORE THE STATUS QUO 518
(B) PREVENT PREJUDICE TO THE ARBITRAL PROCESS ITSELF 518
(C) PRESERVE ASSETS FOR POSSIBLE SATISFACTION OF AWARD 519
(D) PRESERVE EVIDENCE 519
(3) CONDITIONS FOR THE ORDERING OF INTERIM MEASURES-ARTICLE 26(3) 520
(A) A LIKELY HARM NOT ADEQUATELY REPARABLE BY AN AWARD OF DAMAGES 521
(B) AN APPROPRIATE BALANCE OF LIKELY HARMS 522
(C) A REASONABLE POSSIBILITY OF SUCCESS ON THE MERITS 522
(D) FURTHER CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES 524 (4)
CONDITIONS RELAXED FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE-ARTICLE 26(4) }24
(5) THE FORM (AWARD OR ORDER) IN WHICH INTERIM MEASURES ARE GRANTED 524
(6) TRIBUNALS POWER TO MODIFY, SUSPEND OR TERMINATE INTERIM
MEASURES-ARTICLE 26(5) 525
(7) SECURITY ROR THE COSTS OF INTERIM MEASURES-ARTICLE 26(6) 526
(8) DISCLOSURE BY ANY PART} OF ANY MATERIAL CHANGE-ARTICLE 26(7) 527
(9) LIABILITY FOR COSTS AND DAMAGES-ARTICLE 26(8) 528
(10) RELATIONS BETWEEN THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL AND MUNICIPAL COURTS IN
ISSUING INTERIM MEASURES-ARTICLE 26(9) 529
(11) ISSUANCE OF PRELIMINARY ORDERS 530
(12) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 532
IMAGE 12
XX TABLE OF CONTENTS
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS D. EXTRACTS FROM
THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL (1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983),
ARTICLE 26(1) 543
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 26(2) 550
(3! TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 26(3) 551
PART IV: THE PRESENTATION OF THE CASE:
EVIDENCE AND HEARINGS
C EO
INTRODUCTION J: D
CHAPTER 18: EVIDENCE
1. INTRODUCTION 555
2. EVIDENCE-ARTICLE 27 557
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 557
B. COMMENTARY 55/
(1) BURDEN OF PROOF-ARTICLE 27(1) 5 57
(2) DEFINITION OF WITNESSES -ARTICLE 27(2) 5 61
(A) GENERAL COMMENTS JOL
(B) PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 5 63
(3) WRITTEN WITNESS STATEMENTS-ARTICLE 27(2) 564
(4) PRODUCTION OR DOCUMENTS-ARTICLE 27(3) 565
(AL GENERAL COMMENTS 565
(B) PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AT THE REQUEST OF A PARTY 567
(C) ENFORCEMENT OT PRODUCTION ORDERS 570
(5) ADMISSIBILIRY, RELEVANCE, MATERIALITY, AND WEIGHT OF THE
EVIDENCE-ARTICLE 27(4) 571
16) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 574
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 576
I.N ARTICLE 2 T (1) (1976 RULES)-BURDENOFPROOF 576
12) ARTICLE 2^(2) (1976 RULES)-DEFINITION OF WITNESSES 577
(5! ARTICLE 2 (2) (19^6 RULES)-WRITTEN WITNESS STATEMENTS 577 F-N
ARTICLE 2~(3) (1976 RULES)-PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 577
T V ARTICLE 2~(4) (1976 RULES)-ADMISSIBILITY, RELEVANCE, MATERIALITY,
AND WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE 579
D. KTR.KTI FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 580
ILL TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 24(1)-BURDEN OF PROOF 580
(2! TRIBUNAL RULES (1 %3). ARTICLE 24(2)-SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE 587 (3
TRIBUNAL RULES { 1983), ARTICLE 24(3)-DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 588 H!
TRIBUNAL RULES 11983), ARTICLE 25(5)-WRITTEN WITNESS STATEMENTS 593 * I
TRIBUNAL RULES (1983). ARTICLE 25(6)-ADMISSIBILIRY , RELEVANCE,
MATERIALITY, AND WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE 594
CHAPTER 19: THE HEARINGS
1. INTRCIDUCRION (501
2. IHE HEARINGS-ARTICLE 28 602
. TC-UOFTHE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 6 02
B. T OMMENRARV 6 02
*1 TICE OF HEARING-ARTICLE 28(1 I 6 02
* : IHC ^INDUCT OF THE HEARING-ARTICLE 28(2)-(4) 6 04
IMAGE 13
TABLE OF CONTENTS XXI
(A) THE CONDITIONS FOR AND MANNER OF WITNESS EXAMINATION 604
(1) NOTICE OF HEARING AND WITNESS TESTIMONY 605
(2) CROSS-EXAMINATION 605
(3) DECLARATIONS 606
(B) HEARINGS NORMALLY HELD IN CAMERA 6 07
(C) RETIREMENT OF WITNESSES 608
(D) EXAMINATION WITHOUT PHYSICAL PRESENCE OF WITNESS 609
(E) TRANSLATION OF ORAL STATEMENTS, RECORD OF THE HEARING 610
(3) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 611
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 6 13
(1) THE CONDITIONS FOR AND MANNER OF WITNESS EXAMINATION 6 13
(2) HEARINGS HELD IN CAMERA 617
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 617
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 25(1) 617
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 25(2) 619
(3) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 25(3) 6 23
(4) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 25(4) 624
3. CLOSURE OF THE HEARING-ARTICLE 31 6 24
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 624
B. COMMENTARY 625
(1) CLOSURE OF THE HEARING-ARTICLE 31(1) 625
(2) REOPENING OF THE HEARING-ARTICLE 31(2) 626
(3) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 628
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 629
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 629
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 29(1) 629
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 29(2) 630
CHAPTER 20: TRIBUNAL-APPOINTED EXPERTS
1. INTRODUCTION 635
2. TRIBUNAL-APPOINTED EXPERTS-ARTICLE 29 636
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 636
B. COMMENTARY 637
(1) GENERAL COMMENTS 6 37
(2) APPOINTMENT BY THE TRIBUNAL AND TERMS OF REFERENCE-ARTICLE 29(L)-(2)
638 (A) APPOINTMENT 638
(B) TERMS OF REFERENCE 640
(3) OBJECTIONS TO THE QUALIFICATIONS OR THE IMPARTIALITY AND
INDEPENDENCE OF THE TRIBUNAL-APPOINTED EXPERT-ARTICLE 29(2) 642
(4) THE PROVISION OF RELEVANT INFORMATION TO THE TRIBUNAL-APPOINTED
EXPERT-ARTICLE 29(3) 644
(5) THE TRIBUNAL-APPOINTED EXPERT S REPORT-ARTICLE 29(4) 645
(6) EXPERT HEARINGS-ARTICLE 29(5) 646
(7) NOTE ON PARTY-APPOINTED EXPERT WITNESSES 647
(8) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 648
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 648
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 650
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 27(1)-APPOINTMENT AND TERMS OF
REFERENCE 650
(A) THE SHAHIN SHAME EBRAHIMIASE 650
(B) THE ARCO EXPLORATION CASE 6 53
(C) ~THESTARRETTHOITSINGCA.SE 655
IMAGE 14
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(D) THE RICHARDDHARZA CASE 656
(E) THE BEHRING INTERNATIONAL CASE 660
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 27(2)-PROVISION OF RELEVANT
INFORMATION 6 62 (3) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 27(3)-EXPERT REPORT
6 63
(A) THE SHABIN SHAINE EBRAHIMI CASE 663
(B) THE ARCO EXPLORATION CASE 664
(C) THE BEHRING INTERNATIONAL CASE 6 65
(D) THE RICHARDD HARM CASE 6 65
(E) THE STARRETT HOUSINGCZX 6 65
(4) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 27(4)-EXPERT HEARING 6 67
PART V: DEFAULT AND WAIVER
INTRODUCTION 669
CHAPTER 21: DEFAULT
1. INTRODUCTION 671
2. DEFAULT-ARTICLE 30 671
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 671
B. COMMENTARY 672
1I) GENERAL COMMENTS 672
(2) FAILURE TO FILE EARLY WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS-ARTICLE 30(1) 675 (3!
FAILURE TO APPEAR AT A HEARING-ARTICLE 30(2) 6 77
(4) FAILURE TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE-ARTICLE 30(3) 6 77 O)
COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 678
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 679
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 6 83
(1) GENERAL AND TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 28 6 83
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES! 1983), ARTICLE 28(2) 685
(}) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 28(3) 687
CHAPTER 22: WAIVER
1. INTRODUCTION ()
2. WAIVER-ARTICLE 32 691
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 691
B. COMMENTARY 692
I ) GENERAL COMMENTS 6 92
I2I IHE LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE REQUIRED 6 93
(}} COMPARISON TO THE 19~6 UNCITRAL RULES 695
(... EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 695
I . EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 696
PART VI: THE AWARD
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 23: DELIBERATIONS AND DECISIONS
1 . INTRODUCTION 1- DECIMNNS-ARTICLE 33
IMAGE 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS XXIII
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 7 00
B. COMMENTARY 700
(1) AWARDS AND OTHER DECISIONS BY MAJORITY VOTE-ARTICLE 33(1) 700 (A)
GENERAL COMMENTS 7 00
(B) MAJORITY DECISION-MAKING BY THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 704 (1) THE
DYNAMICS OF DELIBERATIONS 704
(2) THE PRACTICE OF DELIBERATING AND DRAFTING AWARDS 705
(2) DECISION-MAKING ON PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS-ARTICLE 33(2) 7 06 (A) THE
MEANING OF QUESTIONS OF PROCEDURE 709
(B) REVISION 710
(3) CONFIDENTIALITY OF DELIBERATIONS-ARTICLE 31, NOTE 2 OF THE 1983
TRIBUNAL RULES 711
(A) THE SCOPE OF THE RULE OF CONFIDENTIALITY 712
(B) ENFORCING THE RULE OF CONFIDENTIALITY 715
(1) CENSURE OF WRITTEN STATEMENTS 715
(2) STATEMENTS OF DISAPPROVAL BY FELLOW ARBITRATORS 7 16
(3) CHALLENGE PROCEEDINGS 716
(4) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 7 16
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT AND OTHER TRIBUNALS 7 17
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 719
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 31(1) 719
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 31 (2) 722
(3) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 31, NOTE 2-CONFIDENTIALITY OF
DELIBERATIONS 7 23
CHAPTER 24: FORM AND EFFECT
1. INTRODUCTION 732
2. FORM AND EFFECT-ARTICLE 34 732
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 7 32
B. COMMENTARY 7 33
(1) DISCRETION TO MAKE SEPARATE AWARDS-ARTICLE 34(1) 7 33
(2) THE AWARD IS FINAL AND BINDING AND THE PARTIES MUST CARRY OUT THE
AWARD WITHOUT DELAY -ARTICLE 34(2) 7 38
(A) GENERAL COMMENTARY ON FINAL AND BINDING 7 38
(1) FINAL 738
(2) BINDING 741
(B) WAIVER OF RECOURSE AGAINST THE AWARD-OPTIONAL PROVISION 742 (3)
WRITTEN AWARD AND DESIGNATION OF THE DATE AND PLACE OF THE AWARD S
MAKING-ARTICLE 34(2) AND (4) 745
(4) OBLIGATION TO SIGN AND FAILURE TO SIGN THE AWARD-ARTICLE 34(4) 7 46
(A) GENERAL COMMENTS ON THE TRAVAUX PREPARATORIES 7 46
(B) PRACTICAL MATTERS REGARDING THE STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR THE ABSENCE
OF AN ARBITRATOR S SIGNATURE 7 49
(5) STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR THE AWARD AND DISSENTING OPINIONS-ARTICLE
34(3) 750 (A) STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR THE AWARD 7 50
(B) DISSENTING AND SEPARATE OPINIONS ^ 52
(6) PUBLICATION OF THE AWARD-ARTICLE 34(5) 7 55
(7) COPIES OF THE AWARD TO THE PARTIES-ARTICLE 34(6) 7 57
(8) FILING AND REGISTRATION OF THE AWARD 759
(9) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 759
IMAGE 16
X X J V TABLE OF CONTENTS
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OFLNVESTMENT AND OTHER TRIBUNALS 7 61
(1) ARTICLE 32(1) (1976 RULES)-TYPES OF AWARD 7 61
(2) ARTICLE 32(2) (1976 RULES)-FINAL AND BINDING 762
(3) ARTICLE 32(2) AND (4) (1976 RULES)-DATE, PLACE, AND SIGNATURE 7 63
(4) ARTICLE 32(4) (1976 RULES)-FAILURE TO SIGN THE AWARD 7 64
(5) ARTICLE 32(7) (1976RULES)-FILING AND REGISTRATION OF AN AWARD 7 65
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 7 66
(1) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 32(1)-TYPES OF AWARD 766
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 32(2)-FINAL AND BINDING AWARD 7 67
(3) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 32(3) AND (4)-DATE, PLACE, AND
SIGNATURE 7 67 (4) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 32(3)-REASONS FOR THE
AWARD 7 68 (5) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 32(4)-FAILURE TO SIGN
THEAWARD 7 69
(A) STATEMENTS OF REASONS FOR FAILURE TO SIGN THE AWARD 7 69
(B) IMPROPER STATEMENTS OF REASONS AND POST-AWARD EXCHANGES 7 73 (6)
TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 32(5)-PUBLICATION OF THE AWARD 7 76
CHAPTER 25: SETTLEMENT AND OTHER GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION
1. INTRODUCTION 781
2. SETTLEMENT AND ORHERTERMINATION-ARTICLE 36 781
A. TEXT OF THE 2010 UNC1TRAL RULE 7 81
B. COMMENTARY 7 82
(1) SETTLEMENT-ARTICLE 36(1) 782
(A) TYPES OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND THE PRACTICE OF AWARDS ON AGREED
TERMS 7 82
(B) DISCRETION TO RECORD A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 784
(C) PRE-SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS 786
(2) OTHER GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION-ARTICLE 36(2) 788
(A) CONTINUATION OF THE ARBITRATION IS UNNECESSARY OR IMPOSSIBLE 788
(B) LITE EXISTENCE OF REMAINING MATTERS 790
I 3) TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AWARDS ON AGREED TERMS-ARTICLE 36(3) 790
(4) COMPARISON TO THE 19 7 6 UNCITRAL RULES 790
( . EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 792
I). EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 793
(11 TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 34(1) 7 93
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983). ARTICLE 34(2) 7 98
CHAPTER 26: POST-AWARD PROCEEDINGS
1. INTRODUCTION 801
2. INTERPRETATION OF THE AWARD-ARTICLE 37 802
A. TEXT OF THE 20! 0 UNCITRAL RULE 802
B. C OMMENURV 802
T 1 V K-NERAL 802
I,2) COMPARISON TO THE 19~6 UNCITRAL RULES 806
C . EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 806
D. EXTRAS FROM THE PRACTICE OR THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 808
3. V ORRECTION OR THE AWARD-ARTICLE 38 811
A. TEXT OFTHE 2010 UXCITRAL RULE 811
B. ( OMMENTARY 811
* 1 GENERAL 811
12. COMPARISON TO THE 19~6 UNCITRAL RULES 8 14
I . EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 815
IMAGE 17
TABLE OF CONTENTS XXV
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 815
(1) REQUEST FOR CORRECTION GRANTED 815
(2) REQUEST FOR CORRECTION DENIED 817
4. ADDITIONAL AWARD-ARTICLE 39 821
A. TEXT OFTHE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 821
B. COMMENTARY 821
(1) GENERAL 821
(2) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 824
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 825
D. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OFTHE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 825
(1) REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL AWARD GRANTED 825
(2) REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL AWARD DENIED 825
5. THE FINALITY OF AWARDS AND THE INHERENT POWER TO RECONSIDER 827
A. COMMENTARY 827
B. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 831
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF THE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 832
(1) LIMITED POWER OF REVIEW 832
(2) REVISION TO ADDRESS FRAUD OR CORRUPTION 836
CHAPTER 27: THE COSTS OF ARBITRATION
1. INTRODUCTION 840
2. THE COSTS OF ARBITRATION-ARTICLE 40 841
A. TEXT OFTHE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 841
B. COMMENTARY 841
(1) THE DUTY TO FIX THE COSTS OF ARBITRATION 841
(2) COSTS DEFINED 843
(A) SUBPARAGRAPH (A) 843
(B) SUBPARAGRAPHS (B) AND (C) 844
(C) SUBPARAGRAPH (D) 844
(D) SUBPARAGRAPH (E) 845
(E) SUBPARAGRAPH (F) 846
(3) THE COSTS OF INTERPRETATION, CORRECTION AND COMPLETION OF AN
AWARD-ARTICLE 40(3) 847
(4) NOTE ON THE COSTS OFTHE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 848
(5) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 848
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT AND OTHER TRIBUNALS 849
3. ARBITRATORS FEES-ARTICLE 41 852
A. TEXT OFTHE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 852
B. COMMENTARY 853
(1) REGULATION OF THE ARBITRATORS FEES AND EXPENSES UNDER THE
RULES-GENERAL BACKGROUND, ARTICLE 41(1) AND (2) 853
(2) DETERMINING THE FEES AND EXPENSES OFTHE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL AND
POTENTIAL REVIEW BY A NEUTRAL ARBITER-ARTICLE 41 (3)-(6) 855
(A) THE MANNER IN WHICH FEES AND EXPENSES WILL BE DETERMINED-ARTICLE
41(3) AND (5) 856
(1) TRANSPARENCY 8 5
(2) NEUTRAL MECHANISM 858
(3) EFFICIENCY 859
(B) THE COMPUTATION OFTHE ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS FEES AND EXPENSES-ARTICLE
41(4)-(6) 860
(1) TRANSPARENCY 860
(2) NEUTRAL MECHANISM 860
(3) EFFICIENCY 861
IMAGE 18
X X VI TABLE OF CONTENTS
(3) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 862
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 4. APPORTIONMENT
OF COSTS-ARTICLE 42 A. TEXT OFTHE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE B. COMMENTARY
(1) APPORTIONING AND AWARDING COSTS (2) THE CIRCUMSTANCES OFTHE CASE
(A) IHE DEGREE OF SUCCESS OF THE PARTIES 0
(B) THE CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES O/L
(C) THE NATURE OF THE PARTIES O/O
(D) THE NATURE OF THE DISPUTE RESOLURION MECHANISM 8/4
(3) REQUIREMENTS FOR MAKING A CLAIM FOR COSTS 8 7}
(A) DOCUMENTATION O/J
(B) TIMING OT REQUESTS O/J
(C) PROOF OT REASONABLE LEGAL COSTS 8 76
(4) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 8 77
C. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 8 77
(1) ARTICLE 40(1) AND (2) (1976 RULES)-GENERAL 8 77
(2) ARTICLE 40( 1) AND (2) (1976 RULES)- CIRCUMSTANCES OFTHE CASE 879
(A! IHE SUCCESS OF THE PARTIES 87Y
(B) THE CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES 882
(E) IHE NATURE OT THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISM 887
IX EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OFTHE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 891
U TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 40(1) AND (2)-GENERAL 891
(2) TRIBUNAL RULES (1983), ARTICLE 40(1) AND (2)- CIRCUMSTANCES OFTHE
CASE 892 (A) THE SUCCESS OF THE PARTIES 8 92
(B) THE CONDUCT OT THE PARTIES 894
5. DEPOSIT OF COSTS-ARTICLE 43 8 96
A. TEXT OFTHE 2010 UNCITRAL RULE 896
B. COMMENTARY 8 97
T ) THE REQUEST TOR DEPOSITS 8 97
(2) CONSULTATION WITH THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY 8 99
13! FAILURE TO MAKE REQUESTED DEPOSITS 8 99
(*T) IHE RIGHT TO AN ACCOUNTING AND THE RETURN OF UNEXPENDED DEPOSITS
900 (= ) COMPARISON TO THE 1976 UNCITRAL RULES 9 01
I . EXTRACTS TROM THE PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS 9 01
O. EXTRACTS FROM THE PRACTICE OFTHE IRAN-US CLAIMS TRIBUNAL 903
APPENDICES APPENDIX 1-UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (AS REVISED IN 2010) 9
07
APPENDIX 2-UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (1976) 9 25
APPENDIX 3-A TABULAR COMPARISON OFTHE 1976-2010 UNCITRAL ARBITRATION
RULES 9 39
APPENDIX 4--I NCITRAL NOTES ON ORGANIZING ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS ! MAY
28-IUNE 14, 1996) 9 67
APPENDIX ^-IHE TRIBUNAL RULES OF PROCEDURE PROVISIONALLY ADOPTED MAY 3.
1 )$}. AS AMENDED MAY 27. 1997 9 83
APPENDIX (1-RECOMMENDATIONS RO ASSIST ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS AND OTHER
INTERESTED BODIES WITH REGARD TO ARBITRATION UNDER THE UNCITRAL
ARBITRATION RULE;, A- REVISED IN 2010 1007
SELECT BIHLIFIIRNIP/ Y 1CP1
HIDES
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Caron, David D. 1952-2018 Caplan, Lee M. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1032640855 |
| author_facet | Caron, David D. 1952-2018 Caplan, Lee M. |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Caron, David D. 1952-2018 |
| author_variant | d d c dd ddc l m c lm lmc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV039152531 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K2400 |
| callnumber-raw | K2400 |
| callnumber-search | K2400 |
| callnumber-sort | K 42400 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| classification_rvk | PT 350 PU 1555 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)745518042 (DE-599)BVBBV039152531 |
| dewey-full | 341.5/22 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.5/22 |
| dewey-search | 341.5/22 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.5 222 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | second editon |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02783nam a2200613 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV039152531</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190117 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">110721s2013 xxk |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780199696307</subfield><subfield code="c">Hardback: GBP 237.00, EUR 284.69 (DE)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-969630-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)745518042</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV039152531</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K2400</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.5/22</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 350</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139874:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 1555</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139930:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caron, David D.</subfield><subfield code="d">1952-2018</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1032640855</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The UNCITRAL arbitration rules</subfield><subfield code="b">a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules)</subfield><subfield code="c">David Caron, Lee M. Caplan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">second editon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LXXXI, 1048 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oxford commentaries on international law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Iran-United States Claims Tribunal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nations Unies - Commission pour le droit commercial international - Règlement d'arbitrage de la C.N.U.D.C.I</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United Nations Commission on International Trade Law</subfield><subfield code="t">UNCITRAL arbitration rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vereinte Nationen</subfield><subfield code="t">UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4684680-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitrage (Droit)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitrage international</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale arbitrage</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Réclamations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verdragen</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitration and award</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitration, International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Claims</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Iran-United States Claims Tribunal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132605-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4136710-8</subfield><subfield code="a">Kommentar</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132605-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Vereinte Nationen</subfield><subfield code="t">UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4684680-3</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caplan, Lee M.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vereinte Nationen</subfield><subfield code="b">Commission on International Trade Law</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14685-7</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024170291&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024170291</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4136710-8 Kommentar gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Kommentar |
| id | DE-604.BV039152531 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:00:07Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | (DE-588)14685-7 |
| isbn | 9780199696307 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024170291 |
| oclc_num | 745518042 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 DE-20 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-384 DE-M382 DE-29 DE-11 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-739 DE-20 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-384 DE-M382 DE-29 DE-11 DE-188 |
| physical | LXXXI, 1048 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Oxford commentaries on international law |
| spelling | Caron, David D. 1952-2018 Verfasser (DE-588)1032640855 aut The UNCITRAL arbitration rules a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules) David Caron, Lee M. Caplan second editon Oxford Oxford University Press 2013 LXXXI, 1048 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Oxford commentaries on international law Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Nations Unies - Commission pour le droit commercial international - Règlement d'arbitrage de la C.N.U.D.C.I United Nations Commission on International Trade Law UNCITRAL arbitration rules Vereinte Nationen UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (DE-588)4684680-3 gnd rswk-swf Arbitrage (Droit) Arbitrage international Internationale arbitrage gtt Réclamations Verdragen gtt Arbitration and award Arbitration, International Claims Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132605-2 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4136710-8 Kommentar gnd-content Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132605-2 s DE-604 Vereinte Nationen UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (DE-588)4684680-3 u 1\p DE-604 Caplan, Lee M. Verfasser aut Vereinte Nationen Commission on International Trade Law Sonstige (DE-588)14685-7 oth SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024170291&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Caron, David D. 1952-2018 Caplan, Lee M. The UNCITRAL arbitration rules a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules) Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Nations Unies - Commission pour le droit commercial international - Règlement d'arbitrage de la C.N.U.D.C.I United Nations Commission on International Trade Law UNCITRAL arbitration rules Vereinte Nationen UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (DE-588)4684680-3 gnd Arbitrage (Droit) Arbitrage international Internationale arbitrage gtt Réclamations Verdragen gtt Arbitration and award Arbitration, International Claims Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132605-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4684680-3 (DE-588)4132605-2 (DE-588)4136710-8 |
| title | The UNCITRAL arbitration rules a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules) |
| title_auth | The UNCITRAL arbitration rules a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules) |
| title_exact_search | The UNCITRAL arbitration rules a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules) |
| title_full | The UNCITRAL arbitration rules a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules) David Caron, Lee M. Caplan |
| title_fullStr | The UNCITRAL arbitration rules a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules) David Caron, Lee M. Caplan |
| title_full_unstemmed | The UNCITRAL arbitration rules a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules) David Caron, Lee M. Caplan |
| title_short | The UNCITRAL arbitration rules |
| title_sort | the uncitral arbitration rules a commentary with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 uncitral arbitration rules |
| title_sub | a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules) |
| topic | Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Nations Unies - Commission pour le droit commercial international - Règlement d'arbitrage de la C.N.U.D.C.I United Nations Commission on International Trade Law UNCITRAL arbitration rules Vereinte Nationen UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (DE-588)4684680-3 gnd Arbitrage (Droit) Arbitrage international Internationale arbitrage gtt Réclamations Verdragen gtt Arbitration and award Arbitration, International Claims Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132605-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Nations Unies - Commission pour le droit commercial international - Règlement d'arbitrage de la C.N.U.D.C.I United Nations Commission on International Trade Law UNCITRAL arbitration rules Vereinte Nationen UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules Arbitrage (Droit) Arbitrage international Internationale arbitrage Réclamations Verdragen Arbitration and award Arbitration, International Claims Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit Kommentar |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024170291&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carondavidd theuncitralarbitrationrulesacommentarywithanintegratedandcomparativediscussionofthe2010and1976uncitralarbitrationrules AT caplanleem theuncitralarbitrationrulesacommentarywithanintegratedandcomparativediscussionofthe2010and1976uncitralarbitrationrules AT vereintenationencommissiononinternationaltradelaw theuncitralarbitrationrulesacommentarywithanintegratedandcomparativediscussionofthe2010and1976uncitralarbitrationrules |