Managing university intellectual property in the public interest:
Thirty years ago federal policy underwent a major change through the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which fostered greater uniformity in the way research agencies treat inventions arising from the work they sponsor. Before the Act, if government agencies funded university research, the funding agency retain...
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, DC
National Academies Press
2011
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Thirty years ago federal policy underwent a major change through the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which fostered greater uniformity in the way research agencies treat inventions arising from the work they sponsor. Before the Act, if government agencies funded university research, the funding agency retained ownership of the knowledge and technologies that resulted. However, very little federally funded research was actually commercialized. As a result of the Act's passage, patenting and licensing activity from such research has accelerated. Although the system created by the Act has remained stable, it has generated debate about whether it might impede other forms of knowledge transfer. Concerns have also arisen that universities might prioritize commercialization at the expense of their traditional mission to pursue fundamental knowledge--for example, by steering research away from curiosity-driven topics toward applications that could yield financial returns. To address these concerns, the National Research Council convened a committee of experts from universities, industry, foundations, and similar organizations, as well as scholars of the subject, to review experience and evidence of the technology transfer system's effects and to recommend improvements. The present volume summarizes the committee's principal findings and recommendations |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references |
| Beschreibung: | XV, 102 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780309161114 0309161118 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV037283757 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20110728 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 110316s2011 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309161114 |9 978-0-309-16111-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 0309161118 |9 0-309-16111-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)705935075 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV037283757 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Managing university intellectual property in the public interest |c Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property: Lessons from a Generation of Experience, Research, and Dialogue ; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy ; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law ; Policy and Global Affairs ; Stephen A. Merrill and Anne-Marie Mazza, eds |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, DC |b National Academies Press |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a XV, 102 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references | ||
| 520 | |a Thirty years ago federal policy underwent a major change through the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which fostered greater uniformity in the way research agencies treat inventions arising from the work they sponsor. Before the Act, if government agencies funded university research, the funding agency retained ownership of the knowledge and technologies that resulted. However, very little federally funded research was actually commercialized. As a result of the Act's passage, patenting and licensing activity from such research has accelerated. Although the system created by the Act has remained stable, it has generated debate about whether it might impede other forms of knowledge transfer. Concerns have also arisen that universities might prioritize commercialization at the expense of their traditional mission to pursue fundamental knowledge--for example, by steering research away from curiosity-driven topics toward applications that could yield financial returns. To address these concerns, the National Research Council convened a committee of experts from universities, industry, foundations, and similar organizations, as well as scholars of the subject, to review experience and evidence of the technology transfer system's effects and to recommend improvements. The present volume summarizes the committee's principal findings and recommendations | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Intellectual property / United States / Management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Technology transfer | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Merrill, Stephen A. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-021196498 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804143914575200256 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV037283757 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)705935075 (DE-599)BVBBV037283757 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02619nam a2200325 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV037283757</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20110728 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">110316s2011 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309161114</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-16111-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309161118</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-16111-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)705935075</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV037283757</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Managing university intellectual property in the public interest</subfield><subfield code="c">Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property: Lessons from a Generation of Experience, Research, and Dialogue ; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy ; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law ; Policy and Global Affairs ; Stephen A. Merrill and Anne-Marie Mazza, eds</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, DC</subfield><subfield code="b">National Academies Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XV, 102 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thirty years ago federal policy underwent a major change through the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which fostered greater uniformity in the way research agencies treat inventions arising from the work they sponsor. Before the Act, if government agencies funded university research, the funding agency retained ownership of the knowledge and technologies that resulted. However, very little federally funded research was actually commercialized. As a result of the Act's passage, patenting and licensing activity from such research has accelerated. Although the system created by the Act has remained stable, it has generated debate about whether it might impede other forms of knowledge transfer. Concerns have also arisen that universities might prioritize commercialization at the expense of their traditional mission to pursue fundamental knowledge--for example, by steering research away from curiosity-driven topics toward applications that could yield financial returns. To address these concerns, the National Research Council convened a committee of experts from universities, industry, foundations, and similar organizations, as well as scholars of the subject, to review experience and evidence of the technology transfer system's effects and to recommend improvements. The present volume summarizes the committee's principal findings and recommendations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intellectual property / United States / Management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technology transfer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Merrill, Stephen A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-021196498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV037283757 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T22:55:14Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780309161114 0309161118 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-021196498 |
| oclc_num | 705935075 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 |
| physical | XV, 102 S. |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | National Academies Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Managing university intellectual property in the public interest Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property: Lessons from a Generation of Experience, Research, and Dialogue ; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy ; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law ; Policy and Global Affairs ; Stephen A. Merrill and Anne-Marie Mazza, eds Washington, DC National Academies Press 2011 XV, 102 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references Thirty years ago federal policy underwent a major change through the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which fostered greater uniformity in the way research agencies treat inventions arising from the work they sponsor. Before the Act, if government agencies funded university research, the funding agency retained ownership of the knowledge and technologies that resulted. However, very little federally funded research was actually commercialized. As a result of the Act's passage, patenting and licensing activity from such research has accelerated. Although the system created by the Act has remained stable, it has generated debate about whether it might impede other forms of knowledge transfer. Concerns have also arisen that universities might prioritize commercialization at the expense of their traditional mission to pursue fundamental knowledge--for example, by steering research away from curiosity-driven topics toward applications that could yield financial returns. To address these concerns, the National Research Council convened a committee of experts from universities, industry, foundations, and similar organizations, as well as scholars of the subject, to review experience and evidence of the technology transfer system's effects and to recommend improvements. The present volume summarizes the committee's principal findings and recommendations Intellectual property / United States / Management Technology transfer USA Merrill, Stephen A. Sonstige oth |
| spellingShingle | Managing university intellectual property in the public interest Intellectual property / United States / Management Technology transfer |
| title | Managing university intellectual property in the public interest |
| title_auth | Managing university intellectual property in the public interest |
| title_exact_search | Managing university intellectual property in the public interest |
| title_full | Managing university intellectual property in the public interest Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property: Lessons from a Generation of Experience, Research, and Dialogue ; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy ; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law ; Policy and Global Affairs ; Stephen A. Merrill and Anne-Marie Mazza, eds |
| title_fullStr | Managing university intellectual property in the public interest Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property: Lessons from a Generation of Experience, Research, and Dialogue ; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy ; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law ; Policy and Global Affairs ; Stephen A. Merrill and Anne-Marie Mazza, eds |
| title_full_unstemmed | Managing university intellectual property in the public interest Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property: Lessons from a Generation of Experience, Research, and Dialogue ; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy ; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law ; Policy and Global Affairs ; Stephen A. Merrill and Anne-Marie Mazza, eds |
| title_short | Managing university intellectual property in the public interest |
| title_sort | managing university intellectual property in the public interest |
| topic | Intellectual property / United States / Management Technology transfer |
| topic_facet | Intellectual property / United States / Management Technology transfer USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT merrillstephena managinguniversityintellectualpropertyinthepublicinterest |