Sociologia mediului înconjurător: aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Romanian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cluj-Napoca
Presa Univ. Clujeană
2009
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Environmental sociology |
| Beschreibung: | 299 S. graph. Darst. |
| ISBN: | 9789736108426 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV036574505 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20100906 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 100720s2009 d||| |||| 00||| rum d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789736108426 |9 978-973-610-842-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)705678270 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV036574505 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a rum | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nistor, Laura |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sociologia mediului înconjurător |b aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România |c Laura Nistor |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cluj-Napoca |b Presa Univ. Clujeană |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a 299 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Environmental sociology | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Soziologie |0 (DE-588)4077624-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Umwelt |0 (DE-588)4061616-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesellschaft |0 (DE-588)4020588-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ökologie |0 (DE-588)4043207-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Rumänien |0 (DE-588)4050939-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4056995-0 |a Statistik |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rumänien |0 (DE-588)4050939-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Umwelt |0 (DE-588)4061616-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Gesellschaft |0 (DE-588)4020588-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Soziologie |0 (DE-588)4077624-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Ökologie |0 (DE-588)4043207-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020495545&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020495545&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-020495545 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09049 |g 498 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804143158285565952 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Cuprins
INTRODUCERE
9
Mulţumiri
13
PARTEA
I
SPAŢIUL DISCIPLINAR ŞI CONTEXTUL MACROSOCIO
-
ENVIRONMENTAL
AL ABORDĂRII
1.
SOCIOLOGIE ŞI MEDIU ÎNCONJURĂTOR. SOCIOLOGIA MEDIULUI
ÎNCONJURĂTOR
15
1.1.
Conceptul mediu înconjurător
15
1.2.
Sociologia mediului (înconjurător)
17
1.2.1.
Precizări conceptuale
17
1.2.2.
Tradiţia disciplinară şi definirea unei noi paradigme.
Evoluţia sociologiei mediului înconjurător
19
1.2.3.
Diferenţieri intra-disciplinare
23
1.2.4.
Deschideri
interdisáplinare
25
1.2.5.
Spaţiul
transdisciplinar al
studiilor de mediu
28
2.
PROBLEMATICA MEDIULUI ÎNCONJURĂTOR ŞI TRANZIŢIA
ENVIRONMENTAL
ÎN ROMÂNIA
30
2.1.
Mediul înconjurător în contextul regimului socialist
30
2.2.
Tranziţia de mediu
{environmental transition)
în România
36
2.3.
Europenizarea mediului înconjurător
45
PARTEA
II
CONCEPTUL DE ATITUDINE.
EPISTEMOLOGIA RELAŢIEI ATITUDINE
-
COMPORTAMENT.
PROBLEMATICA ATITUDINILOR FAŢĂ DE MEDIUL ÎNCONJURĂTOR
1.
CONCEPTUL DE ATITUDINE
49
1.1.
Definiţii şi abordări structurale
49
1.2.
Dimensionalitatea atitudinilor. Problematica atitudinilor
ambivalente
şi
duale
55
2.
ATITUDINI FAŢĂ DE MEDIUL ÎNCONJURĂTOR ŞI CONCEPTUL
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONCERN
61
2.1.
Conceptul de atitudine faţă de mediul înconjurător (atitudine environmentală)
61
2.2.
Conceptul enmronmental concern (preocupare faţă de mediul înconjurător)
64
2.3.
Metode şi instrumente de studiere ale atitudinilor faţă de mediul înconjurător
68
3.
EPISTEMOLOGIA RELAŢIEI ATITUDINE
-
COMPORTAMENT
73
3.1.
Relaţia atitudine
—
comportament
73
3.2.
Câteva teorii şi modele privind relaţia atitudine
-
comportament
76
3.3.
Relaţia dintre atitudini şi comportamente faţa de mediul înconjurător
81
4.
ABORDĂRI LA NIVEL MACRO ÎN LEGĂTURĂ CU PREOCUPAREA
FAŢĂ DE MEDIUL ÎNCONJURĂTOR
90
4.1.
Studii empirice
90
4.2.
Тега
postmaterialista
a preocupării faţă de mediu şi alte abordări
complementare
93
4.3.
Teza universalităţii preocupărilor faţă de mediu
vs.
іроїега
bunăstării;
alte abordări conexe
99
PARTEA III
ATITUDINI ŞI COMPORTAMENTE FAŢĂ DE MEDIUL ÎNCONJURĂTOR ÎN
ROMÂNIA
Remarci introductive. Sursa datelor şi metodologia
103
1.
DISPOZIŢII COMPORTAMENTALE PRIVIND MODALITATEA DE
PREVENIRE A POLUĂRII
107
1.1.
Consideraţii generale
107
1.2.
Dispoziţia pozitivă şi negativă a prevenirii poluării în România şi Europa.
O perspectivă de ansamblu
111
1.3.
Dispoziţia pozitivă şi negativă a prevenirii poluării în România şi Europa.
Analize la nivel individual
121
1.3.1.
Variabilele analizei
121
1.3.2.
Dispoziţia pozitivă a prevenirii poluării. Analize şi discuţii
139
1.3.3.
Dispoziţia negativă a prevenirii poluării. Analize şi discuţii
151
1.3.4.
Dispoziţia ambivalenţă. O problemă ignorată a literaturii
157
2.
ACTIVISMUL DE MEDIU
IN ROMANIA.
ANALIZA UNUI FENOMEN
APROAPE INEXISTENT
169
2.1.
Consideraţii generale
169
2.2.
Activismul de mediu în România şi Europa. O analiză din perspectivă macro
170
2.3.
Activismul de mediu din România. Victimă a structurilor de oportunităţi?
181
2.4.
Cine participă în organizaţii de mediu şi cine este voluntar? O abordare
comparativă la nivel individual
190
2.5.
Discuţii
201
3.
ATITUDINI ŞI COMPORTAMENTE
FAŢĂ DE MEDIUL ÎNCONJURĂTOR.. CAZUL CLUJ-NAPOCA
204
3.1.
Remarci introductive; sursa datelor şi metodologia
204
3.2.
Atitudini faţă de relaţia oameni
-
mediu înconjurător.
O analiză asupra viziunii
NEP
208
3.3.
Atitudini şi dispoziţii specifice faţă de mediul înconjurător
218
3.3.1.
Evaluarea seriozităţii problemelor locale de mediu
218
3.3.2.
Dispotnţia pozitivă si negativă privind prevenirea poluării
225
3.4.
Comportamente pro-mediu din spaţiul domestic
232
3.5.
Două modele
integrative
asupra configuraţiilor atitudinal-dispoziţional
-
comportamentale
235
CONCLUZII ŞI DISCUŢII FINALE
241
BIBLIOGRAFIE
251
ANEXE
283
SUMMARY
293
Summary
The present book
—
Environmental Sociology: Applications regarding Attitudes and
Behaviors in
Smania
—
summarizes some research undertook during the author s PhD-
student years
(2003-2007)
and offers a both theoretical and empirical framework for
the understanding of Romanian citizens environmental attitudes and behaviors. The
research fits the nowadays internationally well represented area of environmental
concern studies
(Dunlap
and Jones,
2002)
which until now has been rarely explored
by Romanian scholars. This means the lack of nationally significant theories and the
lack of national-level data related to citizens attitudes and behaviors towards the
environment. Based on this relatively empty picture, the empirical investigation
follows the principle of the grounded theory (Chelcea,
2004;
Strauss and Corbin,
1991),
understood not as a qualitative attempt, but as a flexible, multiphased research
(Rotariu and Hut,
2006)
which is not based on a priori set hypothesis and rigid
theoretical frameworks and thus lets explanations to develop alongside the research.
The first phase of the investigation corresponds to a very general study of a
number of statistics from the European Values Survey
(1999)
and European Values
Survey/Public Opinion Barometer (autumn
2005)
related to specific attitudes and
behaviors (preferences for different forms of pollution prevention, perception of the
quality of the environment, participation in environmental organizations, etc.) of
Romanian citizens, respectively to the analysis of some data related to the
environmental attitudes and behaviors of European citizens.
The second phase corresponds to an empirical research
-
designed to add
some nuances to the first framework. Based on facts which have to do with the cost
and feasibility of the research, this last investigation was conducted within the city of
Cluj-Napoca, a particular urban setting, where after several pre-phases (both
qualitative and quantitative) a survey was undertook. The former picture has been
enriched partly through the use of the shortened version of the New Environmental
Paradigm Scale
(Dunlap
and Van Iiere
1978;
Dunlap
et al.,
2000)
considered as the sine
qua
non
instrument of the environmental attitude research, which investigates the so
293
called primitive beliefs over society
—
environment relationship. On the other hand,
nuance has been added through the nearly continuous interviewing, and especially
through the post-survey phase through which we succeeded in interviewing persons
who already have been questioned during the survey.
The book consists in of three parts and chapters corresponding to them.
The first part defines the concept of environment, the disciplinary area of the
research and discusses some data related to the environmental problems in communist
and post-communist Romania (environmental transition), respectively to the process
of environmental Europeanization. More in detail here is discussed the history and
evolution of the environmental sociology and finally the need for inter- and trans-
disciplinary collaborations is accentuated.
The second part constitutes an analytical review of the attitude and behavior
literature and more specifically of the environmental concern literature. As far as the
epistemological domain is very large, only a few, core-questions could be explored:
definitions and structural approaches of the attitudes, dimensionality of attitudes and
the case of attitudinal ambivalence, some theories and models related to the attitude
-
behavior relationship. The last chapter of this part serves as an overview of some well-
known theories in relation to the explanation of the environmental concern, i.e., the
postmaterialism
thesis, cultural theory, paradigmatic shift, etc.
The third part comprises the results of the secondary analysis of data from the
European Values Survey
(1999
and
2005)
and of the data from the personal empirical
research. However from the many items of the EVS questionnaires only a few are
directed towards investigating environmental attitudes and behaviors, they are
centered around those aspects of the environmental concern which are synonymous
to environmental citizenship (environmental attitudes and behaviors from the public
space) and thus focalization of the research was ensured. Among the other advantages
of these databases is the fact that they permitted the investigation of various predictor
variables from a comparative, European perspective, respectively the fact that
databases could be accessed free of charge for the purpose of scientific research. The
rationale of choice was also based on the possibility to integrate our research within
the international flow of environmental concern studies, a great part of which is
undertook on the basis of EVS data.
The dependent variables of the research are: dispositions to contribute financially
for pollution prevention vs. preference for externalization of pollution prevention
responsibilities towards the government; evaluation of some local and global
environmental problems, environmental activism (membership in environmental
NGOs,
and voluntary work in such organizations).
294
As already mentioned, EVS data were completed by the evidence of our
survey undertook in Cluj-Napoca. In this empirical research we ve investigated as
dependent variables the
NEP
Scale
(Dunlap
and Van Liere,
1978),
more specific
environmental attitudes and environmental behaviors from the domestic space.
The independent variables may be divided into socio-structural (age, gender,
education, income, ethnicity and religion), axiological
(postmaterialism,
preference for
equality, freedom, traditionalism, fatalism) and environmental (some specific attitudes,
like satisfaction with government s activity in the field of the environment; preference
for environmental protection vs. economical growth, etc.).
As techniques of analysis both descriptive statistics and more elaborated tests and
analysis were used, most frequently the multi-level regression.
Without the aim to discuss the theoretical background of the dependent
variables, respectively their relationship with the independent variables, in the
followings the main findings and conclusions are listed.
The first part of the empirical analysis consisted of the secondary analysis of
the data based on the two series of the European Values Survey (EVS),
1999
and
2005.
The few items allowed us to situate them alongside the network attitudes
-
dispositions
—
behaviors. Finally, this network was placed within a socio-structural and
axiological context. The primary goal was to establish on the level of every three
components possible social and axiological structures which enhance, moderate, or
inhibit the manifestation of specific environmental attitudes, dispositions and
behaviors. Results obtained on the basis of multiple regression may be concluded as
follows:
■
Romanian citizens are characterized by environmental hyperopia (Uzzel,
2000),
meaning that environmental problems are evaluated in more and more
serious terms as one departs from the local. Such an evaluation reflects the
effect of the enlightenment hypothesis (Gelissen,
2007),
as far as there is a
positive, significant relationship between the phenomenon of hyperopia and
the educational level of the respondents;
■
Local environmental problems reflect the effect of the residence: while those
from urban settings are critical towards the problems from their community,
those from rural settings and small towns are satisfied with their objective
environmental conditions. One may state that the source of this discrepancy
is located within the motivations to escape the cognitive dissonance between
what one desires and can actually have. Another reason may be located within
the framework of reference: those from rural settings probably are less elitist
when select such frameworks.
295
■
The positive behavioral disposition regarding personal, financial contribution
for pollution prevention
-
at least on the basis of cultural theory (Wildavsky
and Dake,
1990)
and
postmaterialism
(Inglehart,
1990, 1995) -
constitutes a
variable which is superior to the negative behavioral disposition (pollution
prevention is the responsibility of the government), as far as the former is
preferred by those with higher education and income,
postmaterialist
value
orientation and trust in the fact that things can be influenced by the
individuals. The negative disposition, on the other hand, has its source within
the less educated and less wealthy public, which is in the meantime
traditionalist and fatalist.
From these points of view, preferences of the Romanian citizens are similar
to those of the Europeans, however, going deeper among the predictors, some
discrepancies occur. For instance, in Romania, the preference for the positive
disposition comes from the part of those people who position themselves at the right
of the ideological and political spectrum, a fact which is contradictory to what
happens in other European regions (except East-Central Europe). Within the cultural
and political theories is already a truism that environmental issues are components of
the leftist ideology, strongly related to
postmaterialism
and to the idea of the new
politics. The explanation of the Romanian evidence may be find within the meanings
citizens assign to political self-positioning. More specifically, these meanings in case of
the rightist self-positioning are the preference for freedom, trust in autonomy and in
the possibility to influence the ways things are going on. As a consequence, seems that
preference for financial contribution regarding pollution prevention appears not as a
specific pro-environmental attitude, but as a socio-economical preference which core-
idea is not the act of pollution prevention (the attitude object), but the way in which
the problem is desired to be solved (the attitude towards the action);
Related to the linkage between these two forms of preference and the
evaluation of local and global environmental problems should be accentuated
that these two preferences can not be confidently modeled through a critical
attitude towards the quality of the local environment, meanwhile the
perceived gravity of global environmental issues constitutes a predictor both
for the positive and the negative disposition. In the first case, the reason is
probably the low coherence of the Romanian s environmental belief system,
while in the latter case probably the ambiguity of the global environmental
problems determines that respondents do not adopt a clear position towards
the ways in which pollution problems should be solved.
Based on these attitudes and dispositions it is already possible to conclude
that Romanian s environmental habitus is multi-dimensionally structured
-
a fact
296
which was demonstrated also through the analysis of the ambivalent dispositions. By
using the Griffin formula (Thompson
et al.,
1995)
we shown out that in case of the
positive disposition of pollution prevention, perfecdy
univalent
responses represent
only
1.1%
of the whole choices, while
17%
of the respondents are perfecdy
univalent
in terms of the negative disposition (in
2005); 5%
of the respondents have ambivalent
attitudes towards these preferences, they being both in favor of the positive and the
negative ways of pollution solving. At a first sight both-and-both attitudes seem to
indicate respondents preference towards joint solutions in accordance with the multi¬
level governance approach. Albeit, when examining the predictors of these positions,
the type of the locality exercises significant negative influence, i.e. the more rural is the
setting, the more ambivalent is the respondent. Such a fact signals ambiguity, rather
than governance-preference, as far as the rural is more traditionalist and in any case
less informed about global environmental problems.
Another objective of the analysis based on the EVS data was the focus on
specific civic environmental behaviors: participation (membership) in environmental
organizations and volunteering in them. Data indicate, in accordance with the
phenomenological intuition, that the frequency of such behaviors is very low among
the Romanian public (approx.
1%).
Our analysis concludes that environmental
(in) activism in Romania should be treated at the conjunction of the eroded formal
social capital of the Romanian citizens, the weak civic resonance of the environmental
issues within a context marked by the economical insecurity of the transition period
(cf.
objective problem), and the incapacity of environmental organizations to
efficiently build coalitions in order to facilitate the access of the public to them.
Individual level analysis of the Europeans environmental activism indicates that both
the classical social and structural variables (i.e. education, income,
postmaterialism,
social capital) and the specific environmental variables may be decisive in spreading
citizens towards organizations.
In the second part of the empirical studies we ve developed further the
framework of investigations. The logic of Cluj-Napoca s investigation was also placed
alongside the network attitudes
-
dispositions
-
behaviors, with the remark that
besides specific attitudes and dispositions which have employed the same aspects as
the former studies based on the EVS, we ve investigated also the endorsement of the
New Environmental Paradigm
(Dunlap
and Van liere,
1978),
in order to answer me
question if more specific attitudes and behaviors can be embedded in very general
attitudes,
i.e.
if the whole attitude
-
dispositions
-
behaviors network constitutes a
coherent belief system.
Related to the endorsement of the
NEP
Scale, results indicate that citizens
from Cluj-Napoca endorse the
NEP,
i.e. they believe in the society-environment
297
interdependence, and reject the HEP (human exceptionalism paradigm). Generally
speaking, the
NEP
vision is quite coherent: at least compared to a number of
empirical research which have signaled the multidimensionality of the
NEP,
in this
case a clear, dominant dimension emerged, respectively a second, minor dimension,
the latter corresponding to a HEP view when it is about the limits of growth for
Romania. In accordance to previous, international studies, among the predictors of
the
NEP
there are education, income and
postmaterialism,
between these and the
dependent variable exists a positive, statistically significant relationship.
Concerning specific attitudes towards the environment, following the EVS
analogy, here were also investigated the attitudes towards the quality of the local
environment, respectively the comparative evaluation of the quality of the
environment: neighborhood vs. city vs. Romania. Results are in accordance with the
environmental hyperopia phenomenon: problems tend to be viewed in much more
serious terms as one departs from the proximity of the respondent. The introduction
of some items which measure a kind of contextualized hyperopia, i.e. the evaluation of
Romania s environmental problems compared to those from the European Union; the
appreciation of the state of Romania s environment after the EU-accession, etc.
produces however different results: the majority of the respondents consider that such
problems are much more serious in Romania than in the
EU,
respectively that the
state of Romania s environment will be better after the accession.
Generally speaking, the case of the positive, respectively negative disposition
concerning pollution prevention produces the same results as on the national level.
There was revealed a statistically insignificant, albeit negative relationship between the
NEP
scale and the positive disposition, in contrast with data from previous
international research. Such a phenomenon determines the conclusion that specific
environmental attitudes can not be embedded into the
NEP,
respectively seems that
not so the
NEP,
as the HEP, i.e. the preference for economical growth instead of
environmental protection leads to a positive attitude towards financial contribution in
order to prevent pollution.
Concerning pro-environmental behaviors from the domestic space, analysis
signaled the existence of two dimensions, corresponding to two behavior types, which
are performed by different groups:
■
A behavior which
-
based on its predictors (high income, education and
postmaterialism)
-
is an elitist type of behavior and has a greater
environmental impact (selective collection of rubbish, the procurement of
eco-efficient electric goods);
•
And another type of behavior performed on the basis of financial constraints,
which is more common among the materialist, less educated public
298
(economical use
of water, buying cloths from the second hand shops and
preference for locally produced goods);
■
None of these behaviors could be related to the
NEP
and even the more
specific attitudes (e.g. the evaluation of the quality of the local environmental
problems) exercised only a weak, statistically insignificant effect on them.
Finally, based on the previously realized regression analysis we ve tried to
construct some models of causal relationship between attitudes, dispositions and pro-
environmental behaviors. Results indicate that in the majority of cases, attitudes,
dispositions and pro-environmental behaviors are not in direct relationship one with
the other, a fact which signals a fragmented, multidimensional and incoherent
environmental belief system among the Romanian public.
Such a fact gets supplementary accents through the second empirical study
undertook in
Cluj-Napoca,
where the
NEP
view, which is considered the general
framework for the specific environmental attitudes and behaviors, could not be linked
to any of these further variables. AH in all, pro-environmental positions are not
motivated by a supreme ecological consciousness; they reflect the effect of social and
structural positions and axiological particularities.
This does not necessary mean that Romanian citizens have less favorable
environmental attitudes, compared to the European and American citizens. The major
difference is the chaotically organized environmental belief system of the Romanian
public which thus signals an incipient phase of ecological consciousness.
Regarding the effect of
socio-structural
and even axiological (except the
rightist self-positioning) variables, the Romanian situation reflects the nomoiogy of
the international literature: better educated, better paid,
postmaterialist
citizens and
those who prefer freedom are the major source of environmental concern.
Concerning the behaviors, the situation is somewhat different. As mentioned
before, there are environmental behaviors which reflect the new class type
motivations and, on the other hand, there is a clear cluster of behaviors, which
however environmentally significant, are not based on pro-environmental attitudes,
but reflects the case of economical constraints.
Given this multi-level source, it is quite difficult to draw a future tendency
and evolution of such attitudes if one takes as a reference point the general and the
specific environmental attitudes, and it is somewhat easier if the reference is the
socio-
structural
and axiological context. It seems that the major source of environmental
attitudes and behaviors should be looked for in economical resources (the affluence
hypothesis), doubled by higher education (enlightenment hypothesis) and by
postmaterialist
value orientations (subjective values hypothesis), so that a singular
approach is difficult to deliver.
299
Bayerische j
Staatsbibliothek
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Nistor, Laura |
| author_facet | Nistor, Laura |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Nistor, Laura |
| author_variant | l n ln |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV036574505 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)705678270 (DE-599)BVBBV036574505 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02034nam a2200457 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV036574505</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20100906 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">100720s2009 d||| |||| 00||| rum d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789736108426</subfield><subfield code="9">978-973-610-842-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)705678270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV036574505</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nistor, Laura</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sociologia mediului înconjurător</subfield><subfield code="b">aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România</subfield><subfield code="c">Laura Nistor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cluj-Napoca</subfield><subfield code="b">Presa Univ. Clujeană</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">299 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Environmental sociology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Soziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077624-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Umwelt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061616-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020588-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ökologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4043207-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rumänien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050939-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056995-0</subfield><subfield code="a">Statistik</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rumänien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050939-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Umwelt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061616-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020588-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Soziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077624-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ökologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4043207-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020495545&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020495545&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-020495545</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09049</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4056995-0 Statistik gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Statistik |
| geographic | Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Rumänien |
| id | DE-604.BV036574505 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T22:43:13Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789736108426 |
| language | Romanian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-020495545 |
| oclc_num | 705678270 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 299 S. graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Presa Univ. Clujeană |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Nistor, Laura Verfasser aut Sociologia mediului înconjurător aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România Laura Nistor Cluj-Napoca Presa Univ. Clujeană 2009 299 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Environmental sociology Soziologie (DE-588)4077624-4 gnd rswk-swf Umwelt (DE-588)4061616-2 gnd rswk-swf Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 gnd rswk-swf Ökologie (DE-588)4043207-5 gnd rswk-swf Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4056995-0 Statistik gnd-content Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 g Umwelt (DE-588)4061616-2 s Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 s Soziologie (DE-588)4077624-4 s Ökologie (DE-588)4043207-5 s DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020495545&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020495545&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Nistor, Laura Sociologia mediului înconjurător aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România Soziologie (DE-588)4077624-4 gnd Umwelt (DE-588)4061616-2 gnd Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 gnd Ökologie (DE-588)4043207-5 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4077624-4 (DE-588)4061616-2 (DE-588)4020588-5 (DE-588)4043207-5 (DE-588)4050939-4 (DE-588)4056995-0 |
| title | Sociologia mediului înconjurător aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România |
| title_auth | Sociologia mediului înconjurător aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România |
| title_exact_search | Sociologia mediului înconjurător aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România |
| title_full | Sociologia mediului înconjurător aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România Laura Nistor |
| title_fullStr | Sociologia mediului înconjurător aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România Laura Nistor |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sociologia mediului înconjurător aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România Laura Nistor |
| title_short | Sociologia mediului înconjurător |
| title_sort | sociologia mediului inconjurator aplicatii privind atitudini si comportamente in romania |
| title_sub | aplicaţii privind atitudini şi comportamente în România |
| topic | Soziologie (DE-588)4077624-4 gnd Umwelt (DE-588)4061616-2 gnd Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 gnd Ökologie (DE-588)4043207-5 gnd |
| topic_facet | Soziologie Umwelt Gesellschaft Ökologie Rumänien Statistik |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020495545&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020495545&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nistorlaura sociologiamediuluiinconjuratoraplicatiiprivindatitudinisicomportamenteinromania |