Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Beograd
Inst. za Međunarodnu Politiku i Privredu
2009
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Regional and neighbourhood cooperation for sustainable development of Serbia in the first Decade of the 21. century |
| Beschreibung: | 290 S. |
| ISBN: | 9788670671096 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV035744347 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 090928s2009 |||| 00||| srp d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788670671096 |9 978-86-7067-109-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)574365639 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV035744347 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-Re13 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stojić-Karanović, Edita |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka |c Edita Stojić-Karanović |
| 264 | 1 | |a Beograd |b Inst. za Međunarodnu Politiku i Privredu |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a 290 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Regional and neighbourhood cooperation for sustainable development of Serbia in the first Decade of the 21. century | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Nachhaltigkeit | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Regionalism |z Balkan Peninsula | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sustainable development |z Serbia | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Regionale Kooperation |0 (DE-588)4455020-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Nachhaltigkeit |0 (DE-588)4326464-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Balkan Peninsula |x Relations |z Serbia | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Serbia |x Relations |z Balkan Peninsula | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Serbien |0 (DE-588)4054598-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Südosteuropa |0 (DE-588)4058449-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Serbien |0 (DE-588)4054598-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Regionale Kooperation |0 (DE-588)4455020-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Nachhaltigkeit |0 (DE-588)4326464-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Südosteuropa |0 (DE-588)4058449-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018604509&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018604509&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1805070593779826688 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
Sadržaj
Predgovor
. 9
Uvod
.;. 11
I
DEO:
DEFINICIJE
Poglavlje
1.
Susedne
zemlje i prekogranična saradnja
. 21
Poglavlje
2.
Multilaterálna
saradnja u Evropi
. 27
Poglavlje
3.
Regionalna saradnja susednih zemalja
.37
Poglavlje
4.
Održivi razvoj kao cilj saradnje
.45
II
DEO
INICIJATIVE ZA
MULTILATERÁLNU SARADNJU
DRŽAVA U JUGOISTOČNOJ EVROPI
Uvodne
reči
о
strukturi ovog poglavlja
i o
značaju regionalne
saradnje na nivou država
.57
Poglavlje
1.
Regionalne inicijative sa pretežno političkim ciljevima
(Autor poglavlja: mr Dragan Stojović)
.63
a) Centralnoevropska inicijativa
. 63
b) Pakt stabilnosti za Jugoistočnu Evropu
i Regionalni
savet
za saradnju
. 68
c) Jadransko-jonska inicijativa
.74
d) Inicijativa za saradnju u jugoistočnoj Evropi
. 76
e) Proces saradnje u Jugoistočnoj Evropi
.78
Poglavlje
2.
Regionalna saradnja sa pretežno ekonomskim i
ekološkim ciljevima
.80
a) Dunavska komisija
-
u očekivanju revizije
. 83
b)ICPDR
. 88
c) Proces saradnje na Dunavu
. 89
d) Međunarodna komisija za sliv
reke
Save
. 93
e) Crnomorska Ekonomska saradnja
. 94
f) CEFTA2006
. 96
III
DEO
ASPEKTI FUNKCIONALNE REGIONALNE
SARADNJE
Uvodne
reči o subregionalnoj
funkcionalnoj saradnji
i o
strukturi ovog poglavlja
.103
Poglavlje
1.
Privatno-pravni aspekti prekogranične saradnje Srbije i
zemalja regiona
(Autor poglavlja: dr
Tatjana
Jevremović
-
Petrović)
.104
a) Značaj istraživanj a pravnog spekta prekogranične saradnj
e
. 104
b)
Fizička i pravna lica u odnosima Srbije i bivših republika
SFRJ
. 106
c)
Položaj privrednih subjekata i poslovanje u zemljama regiona
. 112
Poglavlje
2.
Primer
problema koji koči uspostavlanje funkcionalne
saradnje bivših jugoslovenskm republika
-
Afera izbrisanih u Sloveniji
(Autor poglavlja dr Loran
Hasid)
.123
a) Uzroci afere
.127
- 1992-2003:
vreme
duge i tihe akcije
.130
-
Posle
10.
aprila
2003.
godine:
vreme
kratko i ispunjeno akcijom
. 134
-
Ostale peripetije na račun ne Slovenaca
.150
b) Političke posledice afere: Instrumentalizacija etničkih pitanja
od strane političara
.154
-
Izborna šansa za desničarske partije
.154
-
Poraz za bivšu većinu
.156
Poglavlje
3.
Uloga kulture u stvaranju evropskog zajedništva
i programi podrške EU razvoju kulture
Autor: mr Ana Jović-Lazić
. 161
a) Evropska saradnja u oblasti kulture
. 163
b) Programi Evropske unije za razvoj kulture
. 167
c) Podrška kulturi kroz ostale programe Evropske unije
. 172
Poglavlje
4.
Funkcionalna regionalna saradnja na
delu
-
uspesi i neuspesi
. 176
a) Radna zajednica podunavskih regija
-
preteča subregionalne
funkcionalne saradnje u centralnoj i jugoistočnoj Evropi
. 177
b) Saradnja u okviru Susedskog programa Evropske unije
u jugoistočnoj Evropi
. 181
c) Evroregioni sa učešćem Srbije
. 186
d) Mikroregionalna prekogranična saradnje
-neophodnost inicijative odozdo
. 215
Zaključak
. 220
English Summary
Regional andNeihgbourhood Cooperation for Sustainable
Development of Serbia in the First Decade of the 21st Century
.222
Prilozi
. 235
Pregled svih EU programa i fondova
u koje se mogu uključiti korisnici iz Srbije
. 237
English
Summary
Regional and Neihgbourhood Cooperation for
Sustainable Development of Serbia in the First
Decade of the 21st Century
Dr.
Edita
Stojić-Karanović*
During the
40
years of research work in the Institute of International
Politics and Economics the author focused her attention towards
neighbourhood relations and regional cooperation in South East Europe. Her
research confirmed the hypothesis that the future of this region belongs to new
criteria and forms of international cooperation which are founded on
economic, social, and ecological interests, as well as the interests for
uninterrupted cultural development of all peoples and inhabitants of this area.
The author felt she has an obligation to work also on the practical
implementation, verifying in real life the need, obstacle to, and possibility
of realization of international cooperation in the region. While carrying out
this double role, she had mixed emotions of joy and sadness.
The author was devoted to make implementation of her theoretical
researches generally about regional and cross-border cooperation into the
rel
life. So, with her project "Danube
-
River of Cooperation" she involved
an increasing number of people. As she states, it was a pleasure to see that
from year to year a large number of people, scientists, and experts from
Dr.
Edita
Stojić-Karanović,
Research Professor at the Institute of International
Politics and Economics, Belgrade
&
Founder and President of the International
Scientific Forum "Danube River of Cooperation", www.diplomacy.bg.ac.yu;
www.danube-cooperation.com; edita@diplomacy.bg.ac.yu; danube-org@yubc.net
.
222
various fields of science (including biologists, hydrologists, space planners,
ecologista
economists, lawyers, urbanization experts, etc.), art, media, and
commerce supported this concept, enriching its realization with their
knowledge and interests. On the other hand, things generally also moved in
the opposite
direction:
towards intolerance, misunderstandings, conflicts,
war, as well as the destruction of human lives, material resources and
opportunities for a better life. The association International Scientific
Forum "Danube
-
River of Cooperation
"
upon her initiative issued a call
for peace, declared on May
12, 1992
and it was miserably feeling that it
failed to change anything.
She stated at every international conference at those years that "the fire
of war hinders the development for all people directly or indirectly" and that
"with that heavy burden and wounds, the region steps into the 21st century,
for which not only the poets, but also scientists dreamed that it would be a
century of harmonious progress and development. Those dreams mobilized
us to search for our own paths into a better future. Such
а
-path has once
again proved to be, in spite of the logic of conflict and war -the
development of conscience about the need for better mutual understanding,
tolerance, cooperation among nations, and joining forces in the easier
resolution of common problems".1
The fifteenth anniversary of the first conference "Danube
-
River of
Cooperation" was marked by the knowledge that the mission of the
International Scientific Forum "Danube
-
River of Cooperation" to
continually study the condition and perspective of multilateral cooperation
in the Danube region was
-
in spite of bad circumstances
-
well done. The
war confirmed its lack of sense. Over time, it also confirmed the fact which
represents the foundation of the project "Danube
-
River of Cooperation"
-
namely that the great sensitivity of this region, considering the ethnic
diversity of its nations, should be managed only by applying a wide
program of mutual understanding and particularly cooperation
m
solving
common problems and achieving common goals. Reason and rational
research mdicated that the peoples of the Danube region are directed
towards one another, so that the correct affirmation of national specifics can
be imagined only in a coordinated order in this region. Support for the ideal
1
From the introduction to the Tenth Conference "Danube
-
River of Cooperation»,
the whole you could find at www.danube-cooperation.com
'_223
Regionalna i
susedská
saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi
21.
veka
_
of cooperation, mutual respect and nurturing the cultural and spiritual
resources arising from the differences in this region
-
has become a mission
well worth the lasting engagement.
This book dealing with broader theme of the actual problems and state
of the regional cooperation forms in Western Balkans verifies that the initial
concepts and hypothesis of the author were right.
The international cooperation in all forms, together with a strong
role of civil societies in
au
countries of the region should be oriented
towards preservation of the inheritance in the Danube-region, as well
as in Western Balkans.
Pointing out the scarcity of many natural resources, the author also
believes that the sustainable use of natural resources will be organised in
numerous forms of regional, sub-regional and inter-regional cooperation.
The theme of regional cooperation has a lot of common general issues
irrespective of the geographical determinants. It also has a lot of
peculiarities regarding the parts where regional cooperation is in practice.
The first group consists of some historical determinants, as well as some
terminology questions.
Contemporary concepts of regional co-operation have a long historical
tradition.2 Regional co-operation implies concepts of multilateral
collaboration viewed as a process in which the participating states realize their
interests, which are entirely or partially identical and persistently develop a
wide range of their forms and contents. In its concrete implementation, this
concept gains specific characteristics of the region itself.
From the point of international law, a region is determined by the will
of respective countries willing to establish multilateral co-operation
whereby the regional organizations shall be in compliance with the legal
system of the United Nations. This means that the member states of the
regional organizations shall respect the principles of sovereignty, withhold
1
The idea renewed after the Second World War is in harmony with old concepts of the
European confederation supported by many authors in the 17th century (Anthony
Sampson: Anatomy of Europe, Harper, New York,
1968,
p.13;
Zdenko Rajh:
Problems
of Unification of Europe-Utopia and Achievements,
Kultura, Beograd,
1959).
224,
from military threats or use offeree, and not interfere in the internal affairs
of other states.3
In the second half of the 20th century, which was primarily influenced
by the development of production forces, the need for uniting production
resources had grown more intensively in the wider region, encompassing a
great number of states. But these states were divided by sharp political
borders which expressed the past historical and ethnic development. Thus,
in that moment the borders could not be eliminated. But their sharpness
could be mitigated: these frontiers should allow an intensified exchange of
ideas, people and goods through Europe. With regards to nationalism, it
became clear that one specific nationalism could not be confronted against
another in order to eliminate nationalism. On the contrary, it can be
suppressed only by constructive and collective politics, which have a
framework useful to each of their participants because of mutual interests
and efforts.
Specificity of the relations among neighbouring states is determined by
geographic positions of the region and their historical background. South
Eeast Europe and the Balkans are surrounded by geographic areas of
strategic relevance: the Danube, the Adriatic Sea, the Mediterranean Sea
and the Bosphorus which have always attracted the attention of great
powers. Inter-ethnic tensions have always showed their interest in the
political domination and control over the region. Besides these latent factors
of conflict, factors of peaceful coexistence also exist in the region.
Initiatives aimed at economic co-operation and neighbourly relations
contribute a lot to the process of consolidation of this historically turbulent
geopolitical region. Instability is partly due to historical heritage and partly
originates from contemporary tensions in international relations. But there
are also factors of internal social and economic developments in respective
countries that need to be addressed.
After the phase of bloody conflicts seemed to be over, new forms of
functional, rather than ideological, economic and cultural co-operation in
this region were re-established. Only new forms of co-operation can ensure
optimal joint utilization of common natural resources, such as international
Vojin Dimitrijević,
Obrad
Račić:
International Oi-gamzations, Belgrade,
1971;
Dimitrije Pindić:
Regional Organtations Based Upon the UN Charter, bstitute for
International Policy and Economy, Belgrade,
1978.
-_ _225
Regionalna i
susedská
saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi
21.
veka
_
rivers, and above all the Danube, as well as a common infrastructure, such
as railways, highways and communication systems.
However, progress could only have been ensured through substantial
economic development and cooperation in the region. It became evident that
the historical heritage did not help much in preventing the entrapments of
nationalism. The changes following the destruction of the socialist system
presumed a development of new forms of functional economic, cultural and
ecological links in the region,
ш
the case of the former Yugoslavia, however,
they entered a dead-end of sharp inter-ethnic conflicts. This is where it was
most necessary to prevent the tragic traps of nationalism.
In research works of the Institute for International Policy and
Economy carried out decades before the crisis in Yugoslavia, issues
related to ethnic minorities had been treated in the context of neighbourly
relations. Problems in this respect were viewed as factors hampering
bilateral contacts with neighbouring countries and regional co-operation.
At the same time, depending on the situation, minority issues were raised
as a means for intensifying the political pressure or for disturbing mutual
relations in the region.
Influenced by a series of internal factors, as well as political and
economic trends in the world, during the final process of the confrontation
of blocks, the ideas of co-operation became more viable than ever. Most
countries in the East and South Eeast of the European continent, together
with the issue of structural disharmony, encountered the problem of the lack
of capital for development of infrastructure and for the implementation of
the most up-to-date technology, which, at the same time, stimulated these
countries to co-operate. Simultaneously, they started to prepare for the
opening up of those countries which were one step ahead in economic and
technological development and had free capital for investing in
infrastructure and exploitation of the world's natural resources. At the same
time, the idea of enhancing both bilateral, neighbourly co-operation and
multilateral co-operation in this region became widely accepted.
It is necessary to look at terminology, because clear definitions can ease
the understanding of the complex and many-sided themes of regional
cooperation. We have to make a distinction between "regional cooperation"
in both a wider and narrower sense, and between "cooperation of regions",
"sub-regional cooperation", and "inter-regional cooperation".
226_
"Regional
cooperation"
in
a
wider
sense is a common term for all
varieties and forms, while in a narrower sense "regional cooperation" means
cooperation at the level of states and the participation of states in it. On the
other hand in the co-operation of regions the participants are territorial
muts
of two or more neighbouring countries. Both in English and in South East
European languages, there is a terminological problem based on the term
"region". Namely in the sense of international relations "region" represents
a larger territory of one continent in which many countries are divided by
borders who want to succeed in overcoming the negative impact of borders
by mutual multilateral cooperation. This is regional cooperation in a
narrower sense. At the same time, all states have smaller territorial units
near state borders which also act in the same direction and cooperate with
each other in order to overcome the negative impact of borders. This is the
cooperation of regions.
At the time of its launching, the conceptual objective of regional,
international co-operation was to end the East-West division, as well as to
eliminate nationalism. The concept of regional co-operation can be
considered a specific self-organisation of regions in this part of Europe,
without the intention of the states to align in any direction. It is estimated,
that this concept practically implements a version of "mini or regional
internationalism" focusing on the research of concrete fields of mutually
beneficial co-operation among the regions and in the common region.
The concept of co-operation of regions, together with macro-politics at
state or inter-governmental level, gives priority mostly to small-scale
multilateral and bilateral cooperation between small territorial units, i.e.
cross-border zones, districts, provinces, regions or territories which are
otherwise geographical units or towns.
By "sub-regional cooperation" we can define those forms of
cooperation in which states take part in the smaller part of the whole region.
In this sense we could point out, for example, the Balkan cooperation in the
whole region and the Western Balkan cooperation as a sub-regional
cooperation. The term "regional cooperation" is often used for sub-regional
cooperation and that should be accepted. In that sense we can say that the
"Euro-region" is a sub-regional cooperation of regions.
In "inter-regional cooperation", regions of the continents cooperate by
learning how to solve the problem of sustainable development and by
supporting each other in this issue. There have been some very successful
inter-regional cooperation experiences, for example between the Latin
._ _227
Regionalna i
susedská
saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi
21,
veka
_
American and European regional
organizations. We should also propose
one for the regions to which the participants of this conference belong.
The inter-regional co-operation does not only give an important
dimension to the new European structure, playing a vital role together
with the regional cooperation in the process of building a united Europe,
but it also contributes a lot to the sustainable use of natural resources on
the global level.
The area of central and South East Europe, which is dominated by
the most important natural resource, the Danube, has a rather large
number of varied forms of regional co-operation and co-operation in
the regions based on the importance of the river Danube. Aside from
the old regional organisation, the Danube Commission, whose reform
has also started,4 several new initiatives have been proposed.
The river Danube does not only represent a waterway for transportation
and a bordering river between states, but is also a waterway which connects
regions and is a base of economic and cultural communication. So, several
new forms of regional cooperation arose. According to the concept of
cooperation in the regions, new forms should harmonise the economic
policy of rural development plans, the environment, tourism and other
policies, and not only at the state level, but more often at local and county
level as well. They should enable a considerably wider range of activities
and more possibilities for developing both the smaller region in the
neighbouring countries, and the whole region.
Following the example of the Working Community of the Alpe-Adria,
which emerged immediately after abolishing the block division in Europe,
the Danube Working Community was initiated at the end of the
1980s
and
established in 1990.5 The Community gathered
16
regions of the six states,
among them Serbia and Croatia as regions from the SFRY. The first
presiding region was Lower Austria. Serbia presided the following year.6
4
The Danube Commission was established at the Belgrade conference in
1948,
with the
aim of international regulation of river transport. Since the international relations
changed a lot in the meantime, it is natural to make changes in the organization of the
Danube Commission, seated in Budapest.
5
Established on May
17,1990.
6
Therefore the project "Danube
-
River of Cooperation" was initiated at the Institute of
International Politics and Economics and was started in
1989.
228_
Though it might seem contradictory, the latest wars created new initiatives
for regional co-operation or pointed out the necessity of co-operation again!
These were: the South East European Co-operative Initiative-SECI, the
Royamount Initiative, the Stability Pact for South East Europe and others. All
those have at least one program for cooperation concerning the river Danube
and its tributaries, some of them particularly oriented towards the Danube
cooperation, like the "Danube Cooperation Process".
The "Danube Cooperation Process" (DCP) was initiated in June
2001
by Austria and Romania and supported by the European Commission and
the Stability Pact for South-East Europe. It was officially established at the
first Ministerial Conference of the DCP on May
27, 2002
in Vienna. The
aim of DCP is to give a new political support to the development of all
forms of cross-border and regional cooperation among the countries along
the Danube and its tributaries. The main document of the Process consists
of the Common Declaration and Principles and working methods for the
functioning.
Six "dimensions" are chosen in the Declaration in which the future
cooperation in the framework of the DCP will be organized. These are:
-
The dimension of economy, with special emphasis on the issues of
transportation, taking in to account the already existing forms of
cooperation in the Pan European corridors
VII,
IV, V, and X;
-The dimension of navigation, in cooperation with the Danube
Commission, including the reform of the Belgrade Convention from
1948,
in accordance with new relations in Europe and the Danube
region;
-The dimension of environmental protection including the already
existing efforts in this field, like the cooperation in the framework of the
International Commission for the Protection of the Danube (ICPDR);
-
The dimension of tourism, with an aim to develop potential for tourism
in the whole Danube region in all forms, including agro-tourism and
eco-tourism;
-The dimension of culture, aiming to further promote of the cultural
heritage of all countries in the region and the common multi-cultural
heritage in the whole region;
-The dimension of sub-regional cooperation for supporting alt sub-
regional initiatives and projects oriented towards the development of
_229
Regionalna i
susedská
saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi
21.
veka
already existing projects and initiating new Euro-regions on the
Danube, as well as other forms of cross-border and regional
cooperation.
After the launching of the DCP, some projects were initiated under the
auspices of the Process. For example, there was a revision of the
1948
Belgrade Convention on the Legal Regime of Navigation on the Danube.
Two sessions of the Preparatory Committee and a meeting of the Working
Group on navigation issues were started at the end of
2003.
In the economic dimension the most important project until now has
been the Danube Region Business Conference (DRBC). It was organised
tree times in Vienna, the fourth took place in Bucharest, on
б"1^"1
of
October
2003.
DRBC IV had more than
600
participants, among whom
160
from countries other than Romania. The International Scientific
ForunfDanube
-
River of Cooperation" was one of the
NGOs
with projects
promoted at the DRBC IV.
DRBC IV was organized in two plenary sessions, a VTP panel and
14
theme working groups for transport and ports, finance and insurance,
development and support of small and medium size enterprises (SMEs),
tariffs and trade, environment, public-private partnership, infrastructure, e-
society and
е
-Europe,
tourism, water and health, investments, education,
and culture.
The results of the DRBC IV were presented by the official
representative of the Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs at the
XIV
International Conference "Danube
-
River of Cooperation" in Belgrade,7
too. As Mr. Robert Uzuna stated then, the formulated conclusions and
recommendations of the DRBC IV have to be transmitted, as inputs from
the Danube business environment, to all the other Danube Co-operation
Process participants for analysis and eventual endorsement at the occasion
of the next high-level Conference of the Danube Co-operation Process, July
2004
in Bucharest.
7
The XTV International Scientific Conference "Danube
-
River of Cooperation" was
held in organization of the Institute of International Politics and Economics and the
International Scientific
Foram
"Danube
-
River of Cooperation" in Belgrade, Grocka
and Kovin, on November
13-17,2003.
230
Euro-regions in SEE and in the Danube region
In the last decade of the 20th century a number of Euro-regions were
created in the SEE, the Carpathian Euro-region being the first in
1993
with
the participation of Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and the Ukraine, while
Romania was included later. Presently there are, or just about to be crsaied,
eight Euro-regions in Eastern Europe.
The contemporary concept of cross-border co-operation has been
elaborated with the aim to establish a trans-frontier co-operation in the
region of the most sensitive borders on the European continent, where,
throughout history, but also in recent times (during the process of the
disintegration of the USSR and the SFRY) these borders have given rise to
conflicts. The targets of such co-operation are twofold: on the one hand, to
prevent conflicts, and on the other hand to develop the region regardless of
the existence of borders. As an extra effect of the "Euro-region", they
promote decentralisation and development of the local democracy.
Unfortunately, when such a concept was made public at the first conference
of "Danube
-
River of Cooperation" in
1989
in Belgrade, the Yugoslav
participants were suspiciously listening to it and finally refused it. Yet, the
concept was accepted later and a Euro-region was really established, i.e. the
Danube-Kjish-Muresh-Tisa Region, including the Yugoslav region of
Vojvodina,
as well as Hungarian and Romanian ones.
Euro-regional cooperation in Southeast Europe started after a good
experience of Euro-regions in other parts of the European continent. The
already mentioned "Euro-region DKMT" (named by the rivers Danube,
Krish or
Körös,
Muresh or
Maros
and
Tisza
or
Tisa)
was among the first
to be established. Some more were established recently, but not enough
in number and not sufficient in functional deepness. Namely, in this form
of regional cooperation, the borders could mostly be softened and that is
the precise need all along the borders in Southeast Europe. The Euro-
region could be successful in cutting down xenophobia, mutual
animosities, and the mental disease of nations, whereas some rational
pros and economic and ecological benefits are inevitable. Euro-regions
and cross border co-operations should become determinant elements of
the regional policy of all countries in South East Europe, as the best
instruments of common regional stability.
_ _231
Regionalna i
susedská
saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi
21.
veka
_
Therefore it is necessary to develop Euro-regional cooperation on all
borders in SEE, and especially on the borders of Serbia with Croatia, Bosnia
and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro, but also with Albania, Bulgaria,
Hungary, Romania.
As an example of creating initiative for Euro-regional cooperation the
experience of the International Scientific Forum "Danube
-
River of
Cooperation" should be mentioned. Namely, it continued to work on this
issue at the X international conference "Danube
-
River of Cooperation"
held in
1998,
and at the XI conference in
2000
Euro-regional cooperation
was strongly recommended. Finally, at the
XIII
international conference
"Danube
-
River of Cooperation" held at the Hydroelectric Power Plant
"Djerdap I "(Iron Gate) in Kladovo, where an Agreement was signed by
Serbian and Romanian officials
-
the Euro-region of "Middle Danube
-
Iron Gate" was established. It encouraged economic development of
resources for transport, industry, agriculture and tourism in the region for
sustainable use. It also ensured better protection of the environment and of
historical monuments.8
After the first phase in which the coalition of counties, municipalities
and representatives of the civil sector was created, the initiative still needed
huge support from both the ground and from above. The "ground" refers to
the local authorities, NGO-s, companies, and the "above" to the
international organizations and national officials whose program
encompasses giving support to cross-border initiatives. They have to take
into account the fact that cooperation within the framework of the Euro-
region "Middle Danube
-
Iron Gate" will contribute to other forms of
fostering good-relations with neighbours and regional cooperation, which
helps to keep the peace and maintain stability in the region.
It has been decided that the "Middle Danube
-
Iron Gate" Euro-region
will support concrete elements of cooperation. Therefore, working groups
for the development of tourism and for the protection of the human
environment in Euro-region should be formed, where beside the experts
from the International Scientific Forum "Danube-River of Cooperation",
the representatives of local authorities and local non-governmental
organizations, the representatives of other interested structures would be
8
See the "Final Document of the 14th Conference in
"Danubius"
No.
3-4, 2003,
or at
www.danube-cooperation.com
232_
included. It was also emphasized that the "Middle Danube
-
Iron Gate"
Euro-region is open for cooperation and should experience exchanges with
other euro-regions in the Danube-Basin, most notably, "Danube-Krish-
Muresh-Tisa", "Down Danube-Prat", "Danube
21",
etc.
Conclusion
Regional, sub-regional and inter-regional cooperation forms have the
utmost importance for overcoming the tensions created by the "use-of-
force" history everywhere. Positive effects of multilateral cooperation are
important especially for the sake of alleviation and absorption of
international tensions in South-eastern Europe more than anywhere else on
the European continent. Namely, the unfortunate peoples of the Balkans
were "trained" to be divided by religious and nationalistic ideologies
throughout history, with wars even in the last decade of the 20th century. In
such circumstances all appeals for peace and regional cooperation in that
decade were accused of being dangerous. Whereas in other parts of Europe
all kinds of regional cooperation gained space and richness of forms, in
South Eeast Europe the process was more or less delayed in these countries.
In some countries people were misled by the process of manipulation by so-
called intellectuals, who were in fact nationalists and
xénophobes,
followed
by politicians who used nationalistic slogans to lead people into war.
Hopefully we are out of that storm, and now all forms of regional
cooperation can be developed without misinterpretations and accusations.
Regional cooperation is badly needed in all countries of South East
Europe, especially in the fields of economy and protection of the
environment. Therefore, the forms of regional cooperation, which are based
on sustainable use of natural resources, are the ones which were conceived
and have already shown some results. Those are at the level of states, at the
level of smaller parts of countries, and at the level of cross-border regional
cooperation of municipalities and counties.
The Danube cooperation is based on the importance of the river and its
tributaries, as well as by natural resources which should be used mutually in
a sustainable manner for the benefit of all citizens in the Danube region.
What really matters is that the nations in South East Europe, Balkans,
Western Balkans, or in the Danube Region are dependent on each other.
._ _233
Regionalna i
susedská
saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi
21.
veka
Therefore, a consequent affirmation of the peculiarities of nations can be
imagined only within coordinated activities in the area. However, these
peculiarities should be appreciated as a cornerstone of the multicultural
wealth, both within the state border and the wider region. They should never
be used as factors of division and conflict if survival is the objective.
Today, the fact that transitional changes can open the road to new
forms of regional cooperation is widely accepted in Serbia. Namely,
structural changes affect the foreign trade exchange, which, along with
the changes in the world industry, open a possibility for new forms of
cooperation. At the same time, this new situation in the region, which
came after political atomization, demands a reverse process in the
sphere of economy: new forms of cooperation, trade and industrial
unions of these countries, tax-free zones, organization forums for
improvement in cooperation, bodies of experts in the governments of
these countries, joint chamber of cooperation and mutual help, and
trade and customs unions.
These new forms will open new possibilities in the central part of the
continent for stronger development of full cooperation in this region,
particularly in tourism and transport. However, the realization and
development of new forms of cooperation is ahead of us, those in which
countries and their parts participate, as well as those informal, in which non¬
governmental organizations, concerned with international cooperation in
these parts, participate. The importance of informal aspects of regional
cooperation will rise in the future.
234. |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Stojić-Karanović, Edita |
| author_facet | Stojić-Karanović, Edita |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Stojić-Karanović, Edita |
| author_variant | e s k esk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV035744347 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)574365639 (DE-599)BVBBV035744347 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035744347</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090928s2009 |||| 00||| srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788670671096</subfield><subfield code="9">978-86-7067-109-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)574365639</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV035744347</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stojić-Karanović, Edita</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka</subfield><subfield code="c">Edita Stojić-Karanović</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Beograd</subfield><subfield code="b">Inst. za Međunarodnu Politiku i Privredu</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">290 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Regional and neighbourhood cooperation for sustainable development of Serbia in the first Decade of the 21. century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nachhaltigkeit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Regionalism</subfield><subfield code="z">Balkan Peninsula</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sustainable development</subfield><subfield code="z">Serbia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Regionale Kooperation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4455020-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nachhaltigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4326464-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Balkan Peninsula</subfield><subfield code="x">Relations</subfield><subfield code="z">Serbia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Serbia</subfield><subfield code="x">Relations</subfield><subfield code="z">Balkan Peninsula</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Serbien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054598-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Südosteuropa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4058449-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Serbien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054598-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Regionale Kooperation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4455020-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Nachhaltigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4326464-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Südosteuropa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4058449-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018604509&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018604509&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Balkan Peninsula Relations Serbia Serbia Relations Balkan Peninsula Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 gnd Südosteuropa (DE-588)4058449-5 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Balkan Peninsula Relations Serbia Serbia Relations Balkan Peninsula Serbien Südosteuropa |
| id | DE-604.BV035744347 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-20T04:24:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788670671096 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018604509 |
| oclc_num | 574365639 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | 290 S. |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Inst. za Međunarodnu Politiku i Privredu |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Stojić-Karanović, Edita Verfasser aut Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka Edita Stojić-Karanović Beograd Inst. za Međunarodnu Politiku i Privredu 2009 290 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Regional and neighbourhood cooperation for sustainable development of Serbia in the first Decade of the 21. century Nachhaltigkeit Regionalism Balkan Peninsula Sustainable development Serbia Regionale Kooperation (DE-588)4455020-0 gnd rswk-swf Nachhaltigkeit (DE-588)4326464-5 gnd rswk-swf Balkan Peninsula Relations Serbia Serbia Relations Balkan Peninsula Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 gnd rswk-swf Südosteuropa (DE-588)4058449-5 gnd rswk-swf Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 g Regionale Kooperation (DE-588)4455020-0 s Nachhaltigkeit (DE-588)4326464-5 s Südosteuropa (DE-588)4058449-5 g DE-604 Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018604509&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018604509&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Stojić-Karanović, Edita Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka Nachhaltigkeit Regionalism Balkan Peninsula Sustainable development Serbia Regionale Kooperation (DE-588)4455020-0 gnd Nachhaltigkeit (DE-588)4326464-5 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4455020-0 (DE-588)4326464-5 (DE-588)4054598-2 (DE-588)4058449-5 |
| title | Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka |
| title_auth | Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka |
| title_exact_search | Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka |
| title_full | Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka Edita Stojić-Karanović |
| title_fullStr | Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka Edita Stojić-Karanović |
| title_full_unstemmed | Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka Edita Stojić-Karanović |
| title_short | Regionalna i susedska saradnja za održivi razvoj Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka |
| title_sort | regionalna i susedska saradnja za odrzivi razvoj srbije u prvoj dekadi 21 veka |
| topic | Nachhaltigkeit Regionalism Balkan Peninsula Sustainable development Serbia Regionale Kooperation (DE-588)4455020-0 gnd Nachhaltigkeit (DE-588)4326464-5 gnd |
| topic_facet | Nachhaltigkeit Regionalism Balkan Peninsula Sustainable development Serbia Regionale Kooperation Balkan Peninsula Relations Serbia Serbia Relations Balkan Peninsula Serbien Südosteuropa |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018604509&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018604509&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stojickaranovicedita regionalnaisusedskasaradnjazaodrzivirazvojsrbijeuprvojdekadi21veka |