Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery:
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Philadelphia [u.a.]
Saunders
2008
|
| Series: | Surgical clinics of North America
88,5 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Physical Description: | XVI S., S. 927 - 1157 Ill., graph. Darst. |
| ISBN: | 1416063579 9781416063575 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV035181429 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 081126s2008 ad|| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 1416063579 |9 1-4160-6357-9 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781416063575 |9 978-1-4160-6357-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)270751031 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)HBZHT015736797 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-91 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a RD24 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 617.057 |2 22 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery |c guest ed. Jon Gould ... |
| 264 | 1 | |a Philadelphia [u.a.] |b Saunders |c 2008 | |
| 300 | |a XVI S., S. 927 - 1157 |b Ill., graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Surgical clinics of North America |v 88,5 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bariatric Surgery |x methods | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bile Duct Diseases |x diagnosis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Choledocholithiasis |x surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Colorectal Neoplasms |x surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Endoscopy, Digestive System |x methods | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal |x methods | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Esophageal Neoplasms |x surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors |x surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hernia, Hiatal |x surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hernia, Inguinal |x surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Laparoscopic surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surgery, Laparoscopic |x trends | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive |x trends | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gould, Jon |4 edt | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Surgical clinics of North America |v 88,5 |w (DE-604)BV000003239 |9 88,5 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m HBZ Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016988185&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016988185 | ||
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804138354796658688 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | ADVANCES AND CONTROVERSIES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY
CONTENTS
Foreword xi
Ronald F. Martin
Preface xv
Jon Gould and W. Scott Melvin
Lessons Learned from the Evolution
of the Laparoscopic Revolution 927
E. Christopher Ellison and Larry C. Carey
After 100 years of practice, the face of general surgery changed
forever when laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced. The
impact was felt in how new procedures were taught and learned,
proficiency determined, and credentials established. In addition,
the revolution of laparoscopic surgery brought to bear ethical
considerations and the harsh reality of medical legal and economic
ramifications of new technology introduction. Finally, minimally
invasive surgery challenged dogma of traditional perioperative
care, allowing streamlining of postoperative recovery.
Antireflux Surgery 943
C. Daniel Smith
Antireflux surgery (ARS) is appropriate and effective management
for patients who have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
refractory to medical management, who are on lifelong acid
suppression, or who are experiencing side effects of the medical
management. Over the past 2 decades, the operations have evolved
from predominantly open thoracic approaches to a predominantly
laparoscopic abdominal approach with similar, if not better,
outcomes. The success of ARS in managing GERD lies largely
in an understanding of GERD and its diagnosis, proper pa¬
tient selection, sound surgical technique, and postoperative
management.
VOLUME 88 • NUMBER 5 • OCTOBER 2008 V
Current Controversies in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair 959
S. Scott Davis, Jr
The management of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has become one of
the most widely debated and controversial areas in surgery. PEHs are
relatively uncommon, often presenting in patients entering their
seventh or eighth decades of life. Patients who have PEH often bear
complicating medical comorbidities making them potentially poor
operative candidates. Taking this into account makes surgical
management of these patients all the more complex. Many consid¬
erations must be taken into account in formulating a management
strategy for patients who have PEHs, and these considerations have
led surgeons into ongoing debates in recent decades.
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Malignant
and Premalignant Diseases of the Esophagus 979
James D. Maloney and Tracey L. Weigel
Minimally invasive approaches increasingly are used to treat
esophageal cancer and Barrett s esophagitis with high-grade
dysplasia. The goals of a minimally invasive esophageal resection
are to provide sound oncologic therapy while minimizing morbid¬
ity. This article describes the technique the authors use for
laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Comparison data
are presented for alternative endoscopic therapy primarily used in
candidates not suitable for surgery.
Bariatric Surgery: Choosing the Optimal Procedure 991
Bradley J. Needleman and Lynn C. Happel
Choosing the right operation for weight loss continues to be a
challenging and subjective process. In experienced hands, most
operations have the ability to be successful in providing a given
patient with meaningful weight loss and impart better health
through loss of adiposity, amelioration of comorbidities, and
improvement of overall quality of life.
Minimally Invasive Resection of Gastrointestinal
Stromal Tumors 1009
Chirag Dholakia and Jon Gould
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare neoplasms. The
advent of electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry has led
to the realization that these tumors originate from a pleuropotentail
cell known as the interstitial cell of Cajal (ICC). The morphologic
features demonstrated as most predictive of recurrence or
metastases are tumor size and mitotic rate. There is oncologic
justification for minimally invasive resection techniques with gross
margins for GISTs. Minimally invasive resection provides advan¬
tages to patients in terms of morbidity and recovery. A variety of
endoscopic, laparoscopic, and hybrid techniques are described for
surgically excising GISTs in different anatomic locations.
vi CONTENTS
Choledocholithiasis, Endoscopic Retrograde
Cholangiopancreatography, and Laparoscopic
Common Bile Duct Exploration 1019
Matthew Kroh and Bipan Chand
With the litany of advances in laparoscopy and endoscopy, much has
improved regarding management of choledocholithiasis. This article
examines the different approaches currently available to remove
common bile duct stones, with an examination of the literature
supporting different approaches and the techniques involved.
Current Trends in Laparoscopic Solid Organ Surgery:
Spleen, Adrenal, Pancreas, and Liver 1033
Lora Melman and Brent D. Matthews
Laparoscopic procedures are becoming increasingly preferred by
both surgeons and patients owing to decreased pain, reduced
perioperative morbidity, and an earlier return to self-reliance.
Laparoscopy for solid organ surgery has been slower to evolve
when compared with procedures such as laparoscopic cholecys-
tectomy owing to factors involving lower case volume and
refinement of technologies specific to operations involving the
spleen, adrenal, pancreas, and liver. Future integration of technol¬
ogy will allow surgeons to offer increasingly less morbid therapies
aimed at the patient s best clinical outcome.
Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Resection of Malignant
Colorectal Disease 1047
Matthew C. Koopmann and Charles P. Heise
Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer is a burgeoning
field of general surgery. Randomized controlled trials have
assessed short-term patient-oriented and long-term oncologic
outcomes for laparoscopic resection. These trials have demonstra¬
ted that oncologically, the laparoscopic approach is equivalent to
open surgery with a shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopic resection
also may result in improved short-term patient oriented outcomes.
Transanal excision of select rectal cancer using endoscopic micro¬
surgery is promising and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is
an emerging modality. The efficacy of minimally invasive treat¬
ment for rectal cancer compared with conventional approaches will
be clarified further in randomized controlled trials.
Laparoscopic versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair 1073
Jon Gould
Inguinal hernias are common, with a lifetime risk of 27% in men and
3% in women. Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common
operations in general surgery. Despite more than 200 years of
experience, the optimal surgical approach to inguinal hernia remains
controversial. Surgeons and patients face many decisions when it
comes to inguinal hernias: repair or no repair, mesh or no mesh, what
CONTENTS vii
kind of mesh, open or laparoscopic, extraperitoneal or trans-
abdominal, and so forth. Inguinal hernia repairs have morbidity
and recurrence rates that are not inconsequential. The search for the
gold standard of repair continues.
Laparoscopic Versus Open Ventral Hernia Repair 1083
Judy Jin and Michael J. Rosen
Ventral hernia repair remains one of the most common operations
performed by general surgeons. Despite the frequency with which
this procedure is performed, there is little agreement and extensive
controversy as to the cause of most of the hernias, or the ideal
approach to repair these complicated problems. This article
attempts to identify and provide some clarification of these
controversial issues in abdominal wall reconstruction after ventral
herniation based on the available literature.
Recent Advances and Controversies in Pediatric
Laparoscopic Surgery 1101
Emily T. Durkin and Aimen F. Shaaban
Children represent a unique group of patients who are likely to
greatly benefit from minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The promise
of less postoperative pain, smaller scars, shorter hospital stays, and a
faster return to school continues to drive growth in this area. The
development of pediatric-specific techniques and documentation of
improved outcomes form a critical gateway to widespread
application of pediatric MIS. A brief perspective on current
approaches to MIS for pediatric congenital and acquired disease is
provided in this report. Technical departures from standardized
adult MIS and the rationale for their modification are highlighted.
Robotic Surgery 1121
Dmitry Oleynikov
This article discusses the developments that led up to robotic surgical
systems as well as what is on the horizon for new robotic technology.
Topics include how robotics is enabling new types of procedures,
including natural orifice endoscopic translumenal surgery in which
one cannot reach by hand under any circumstances, and how these
developments will drive the next generation of robots.
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery 1131
Simon Bergman and W. Scott Melvin
This article provides an overview of the currently available animal
data on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) on
the topics of translumenal access and closure, iatrogenic intra-
peritoneal complications, especially infection and overinsufflation,
spatial orientation, and the development of enabling technologies.
Human trials to date are also reviewed and discussed.
Index 1149
viii CONTENTS
|
| adam_txt |
ADVANCES AND CONTROVERSIES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY
CONTENTS
Foreword xi
Ronald F. Martin
Preface xv
Jon Gould and W. Scott Melvin
Lessons Learned from the Evolution
of the Laparoscopic Revolution 927
E. Christopher Ellison and Larry C. Carey
After 100 years of practice, the face of general surgery changed
forever when laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced. The
impact was felt in how new procedures were taught and learned,
proficiency determined, and credentials established. In addition,
the revolution of laparoscopic surgery brought to bear ethical
considerations and the harsh reality of medical legal and economic
ramifications of new technology introduction. Finally, minimally
invasive surgery challenged dogma of traditional perioperative
care, allowing streamlining of postoperative recovery.
Antireflux Surgery 943
C. Daniel Smith
Antireflux surgery (ARS) is appropriate and effective management
for patients who have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
refractory to medical management, who are on lifelong acid
suppression, or who are experiencing side effects of the medical
management. Over the past 2 decades, the operations have evolved
from predominantly open thoracic approaches to a predominantly
laparoscopic abdominal approach with similar, if not better,
outcomes. The success of ARS in managing GERD lies largely
in an understanding of GERD and its diagnosis, proper pa¬
tient selection, sound surgical technique, and postoperative
management.
VOLUME 88 • NUMBER 5 • OCTOBER 2008 V
Current Controversies in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair 959
S. Scott Davis, Jr
The management of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has become one of
the most widely debated and controversial areas in surgery. PEHs are
relatively uncommon, often presenting in patients entering their
seventh or eighth decades of life. Patients who have PEH often bear
complicating medical comorbidities making them potentially poor
operative candidates. Taking this into account makes surgical
management of these patients all the more complex. Many consid¬
erations must be taken into account in formulating a management
strategy for patients who have PEHs, and these considerations have
led surgeons into ongoing debates in recent decades.
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Malignant
and Premalignant Diseases of the Esophagus 979
James D. Maloney and Tracey L. Weigel
Minimally invasive approaches increasingly are used to treat
esophageal cancer and Barrett's esophagitis with high-grade
dysplasia. The goals of a minimally invasive esophageal resection
are to provide sound oncologic therapy while minimizing morbid¬
ity. This article describes the technique the authors use for
laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Comparison data
are presented for alternative endoscopic therapy primarily used in
candidates not suitable for surgery.
Bariatric Surgery: Choosing the Optimal Procedure 991
Bradley J. Needleman and Lynn C. Happel
Choosing the right operation for weight loss continues to be a
challenging and subjective process. In experienced hands, most
operations have the ability to be successful in providing a given
patient with meaningful weight loss and impart better health
through loss of adiposity, amelioration of comorbidities, and
improvement of overall quality of life.
Minimally Invasive Resection of Gastrointestinal
Stromal Tumors 1009
Chirag Dholakia and Jon Gould
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare neoplasms. The
advent of electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry has led
to the realization that these tumors originate from a pleuropotentail
cell known as the interstitial cell of Cajal (ICC). The morphologic
features demonstrated as most predictive of recurrence or
metastases are tumor size and mitotic rate. There is oncologic
justification for minimally invasive resection techniques with gross
margins for GISTs. Minimally invasive resection provides advan¬
tages to patients in terms of morbidity and recovery. A variety of
endoscopic, laparoscopic, and hybrid techniques are described for
surgically excising GISTs in different anatomic locations.
vi CONTENTS
Choledocholithiasis, Endoscopic Retrograde
Cholangiopancreatography, and Laparoscopic
Common Bile Duct Exploration 1019
Matthew Kroh and Bipan Chand
With the litany of advances in laparoscopy and endoscopy, much has
improved regarding management of choledocholithiasis. This article
examines the different approaches currently available to remove
common bile duct stones, with an examination of the literature
supporting different approaches and the techniques involved.
Current Trends in Laparoscopic Solid Organ Surgery:
Spleen, Adrenal, Pancreas, and Liver 1033
Lora Melman and Brent D. Matthews
Laparoscopic procedures are becoming increasingly preferred by
both surgeons and patients owing to decreased pain, reduced
perioperative morbidity, and an earlier return to self-reliance.
Laparoscopy for solid organ surgery has been slower to evolve
when compared with procedures such as laparoscopic cholecys-
tectomy owing to factors involving lower case volume and
refinement of technologies specific to operations involving the
spleen, adrenal, pancreas, and liver. Future integration of technol¬
ogy will allow surgeons to offer increasingly less morbid therapies
aimed at the patient's best clinical outcome.
Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Resection of Malignant
Colorectal Disease 1047
Matthew C. Koopmann and Charles P. Heise
Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer is a burgeoning
field of general surgery. Randomized controlled trials have
assessed short-term patient-oriented and long-term oncologic
outcomes for laparoscopic resection. These trials have demonstra¬
ted that oncologically, the laparoscopic approach is equivalent to
open surgery with a shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopic resection
also may result in improved short-term patient oriented outcomes.
Transanal excision of select rectal cancer using endoscopic micro¬
surgery is promising and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is
an emerging modality. The efficacy of minimally invasive treat¬
ment for rectal cancer compared with conventional approaches will
be clarified further in randomized controlled trials.
Laparoscopic versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair 1073
Jon Gould
Inguinal hernias are common, with a lifetime risk of 27% in men and
3% in women. Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common
operations in general surgery. Despite more than 200 years of
experience, the optimal surgical approach to inguinal hernia remains
controversial. Surgeons and patients face many decisions when it
comes to inguinal hernias: repair or no repair, mesh or no mesh, what
CONTENTS vii
kind of mesh, open or laparoscopic, extraperitoneal or trans-
abdominal, and so forth. Inguinal hernia repairs have morbidity
and recurrence rates that are not inconsequential. The search for the
gold standard of repair continues.
Laparoscopic Versus Open Ventral Hernia Repair 1083
Judy Jin and Michael J. Rosen
Ventral hernia repair remains one of the most common operations
performed by general surgeons. Despite the frequency with which
this procedure is performed, there is little agreement and extensive
controversy as to the cause of most of the hernias, or the ideal
approach to repair these complicated problems. This article
attempts to identify and provide some clarification of these
controversial issues in abdominal wall reconstruction after ventral
herniation based on the available literature.
Recent Advances and Controversies in Pediatric
Laparoscopic Surgery 1101
Emily T. Durkin and Aimen F. Shaaban
Children represent a unique group of patients who are likely to
greatly benefit from minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The promise
of less postoperative pain, smaller scars, shorter hospital stays, and a
faster return to school continues to drive growth in this area. The
development of pediatric-specific techniques and documentation of
improved outcomes form a critical gateway to widespread
application of pediatric MIS. A brief perspective on current
approaches to MIS for pediatric congenital and acquired disease is
provided in this report. Technical departures from standardized
adult MIS and the rationale for their modification are highlighted.
Robotic Surgery 1121
Dmitry Oleynikov
This article discusses the developments that led up to robotic surgical
systems as well as what is on the horizon for new robotic technology.
Topics include how robotics is enabling new types of procedures,
including natural orifice endoscopic translumenal surgery in which
one cannot reach by hand under any circumstances, and how these
developments will drive the next generation of robots.
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery 1131
Simon Bergman and W. Scott Melvin
This article provides an overview of the currently available animal
data on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) on
the topics of translumenal access and closure, iatrogenic intra-
peritoneal complications, especially infection and overinsufflation,
spatial orientation, and the development of enabling technologies.
Human trials to date are also reviewed and discussed.
Index 1149
viii CONTENTS |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author2 | Gould, Jon |
| author2_role | edt |
| author2_variant | j g jg |
| author_facet | Gould, Jon |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV035181429 |
| callnumber-first | R - Medicine |
| callnumber-label | RD24 |
| callnumber-raw | RD24 |
| callnumber-search | RD24 |
| callnumber-sort | RD 224 |
| callnumber-subject | RD - Surgery |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)270751031 (DE-599)HBZHT015736797 |
| dewey-full | 617.057 |
| dewey-hundreds | 600 - Technology (Applied sciences) |
| dewey-ones | 617 - Surgery & related medical specialties |
| dewey-raw | 617.057 |
| dewey-search | 617.057 |
| dewey-sort | 3617.057 |
| dewey-tens | 610 - Medicine and health |
| discipline | Medizin |
| discipline_str_mv | Medizin |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01912nam a2200493 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035181429</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">081126s2008 ad|| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1416063579</subfield><subfield code="9">1-4160-6357-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781416063575</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4160-6357-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)270751031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)HBZHT015736797</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">617.057</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery</subfield><subfield code="c">guest ed. Jon Gould ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Philadelphia [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Saunders</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVI S., S. 927 - 1157</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill., graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Surgical clinics of North America</subfield><subfield code="v">88,5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bariatric Surgery</subfield><subfield code="x">methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bile Duct Diseases</subfield><subfield code="x">diagnosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Choledocholithiasis</subfield><subfield code="x">surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Colorectal Neoplasms</subfield><subfield code="x">surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Endoscopy, Digestive System</subfield><subfield code="x">methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subfield><subfield code="x">methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Esophageal Neoplasms</subfield><subfield code="x">surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors</subfield><subfield code="x">surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hernia, Hiatal</subfield><subfield code="x">surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hernia, Inguinal</subfield><subfield code="x">surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laparoscopic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Surgery, Laparoscopic</subfield><subfield code="x">trends</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive</subfield><subfield code="x">trends</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gould, Jon</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surgical clinics of North America</subfield><subfield code="v">88,5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV000003239</subfield><subfield code="9">88,5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016988185&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016988185</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV035181429 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T22:58:03Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:26:52Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 1416063579 9781416063575 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016988185 |
| oclc_num | 270751031 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-91 DE-BY-TUM |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-91 DE-BY-TUM |
| physical | XVI S., S. 927 - 1157 Ill., graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publishDateSearch | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| publisher | Saunders |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Surgical clinics of North America |
| series2 | Surgical clinics of North America |
| spelling | Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery guest ed. Jon Gould ... Philadelphia [u.a.] Saunders 2008 XVI S., S. 927 - 1157 Ill., graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Surgical clinics of North America 88,5 Bariatric Surgery methods Bile Duct Diseases diagnosis Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Choledocholithiasis surgery Colorectal Neoplasms surgery Endoscopy, Digestive System methods Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal methods Esophageal Neoplasms surgery Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors surgery Hernia, Hiatal surgery Hernia, Inguinal surgery Laparoscopic surgery Surgery, Laparoscopic trends Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive trends Gould, Jon edt Surgical clinics of North America 88,5 (DE-604)BV000003239 88,5 HBZ Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016988185&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery Surgical clinics of North America Bariatric Surgery methods Bile Duct Diseases diagnosis Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Choledocholithiasis surgery Colorectal Neoplasms surgery Endoscopy, Digestive System methods Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal methods Esophageal Neoplasms surgery Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors surgery Hernia, Hiatal surgery Hernia, Inguinal surgery Laparoscopic surgery Surgery, Laparoscopic trends Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive trends |
| title | Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery |
| title_auth | Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery |
| title_exact_search | Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery |
| title_full | Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery guest ed. Jon Gould ... |
| title_fullStr | Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery guest ed. Jon Gould ... |
| title_full_unstemmed | Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery guest ed. Jon Gould ... |
| title_short | Advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery |
| title_sort | advances and controversies in minimally invasive surgery |
| topic | Bariatric Surgery methods Bile Duct Diseases diagnosis Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Choledocholithiasis surgery Colorectal Neoplasms surgery Endoscopy, Digestive System methods Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal methods Esophageal Neoplasms surgery Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors surgery Hernia, Hiatal surgery Hernia, Inguinal surgery Laparoscopic surgery Surgery, Laparoscopic trends Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive trends |
| topic_facet | Bariatric Surgery methods Bile Duct Diseases diagnosis Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Choledocholithiasis surgery Colorectal Neoplasms surgery Endoscopy, Digestive System methods Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal methods Esophageal Neoplasms surgery Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors surgery Hernia, Hiatal surgery Hernia, Inguinal surgery Laparoscopic surgery Surgery, Laparoscopic trends Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive trends |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016988185&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV000003239 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gouldjon advancesandcontroversiesinminimallyinvasivesurgery |