Forum non conveniens: history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Oxford Univ. Press
2007
|
| Schriftenreihe: | CILE studies
3 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XV, 342 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780195329278 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV035034342 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20090805 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 080902s2007 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2006939348 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780195329278 |9 978-0-19-532927-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)166281757 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV035034342 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-355 |a DE-739 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K7625 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.012 | |
| 084 | |a PT 317 |0 (DE-625)139854: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PU 1550 |0 (DE-625)139929: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brand, Ronald A. |d 1952- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)139805303 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Forum non conveniens |b history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |c Ronald A. Brand ; Scott R. Jablonski |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York |b Oxford Univ. Press |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a XV, 342 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a CILE studies |v 3 | |
| 630 | 0 | 7 | |a Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen |f 2005 Juni 30 |0 (DE-588)7541149-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationaal privaatrecht |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechterlijke bevoegdheid |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechtsmacht |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Forum non conveniens | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict of laws |x Jurisdiction | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Beschränkung |0 (DE-588)4247482-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Parteiautonomie |0 (DE-588)4140761-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Zuständigkeit |0 (DE-588)4027387-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationales Zivilprozessrecht |0 (DE-588)4114041-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen |f 2005 Juni 30 |0 (DE-588)7541149-0 |D u |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Internationale Zuständigkeit |0 (DE-588)4027387-8 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Parteiautonomie |0 (DE-588)4140761-1 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |a Beschränkung |0 (DE-588)4247482-6 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 3 | |a Internationales Zivilprozessrecht |0 (DE-588)4114041-2 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jablonski, Scott R. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 830 | 0 | |a CILE studies |v 3 |w (DE-604)BV021616669 |9 3 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Regensburg |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016703260&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016703260 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137966125187072 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Table of
Contents
Preface
.хш
Chapter
і:
Common Law
Forum Non Conveniens:
Four Countries, Four Approaches
.....................
ι
Chapter
2:
The United Kingdom
.......................7
I. Scotland: From forum
non competens
to most
appropriate forum
.,,.......................................7
II. England: From reticence to recognition
......................11
A. First steps: the oppressive and vexatious principle
...........11
B. The most suitable forum approach
........................14
C. Modern forum
non
conveniens doctrine in England
.........21
III. The impact of the Brussels Convention and Regulation
........24
A. The basic framework
....................................25
B. Owusu v. Jackson
........................................28
IV. Current forum
non
conveniens analysis
in the United Kingdom
.....................................33
Chapter
3:
The United States
........................37
I. Introduction
...............................................37
II. Early development
.........................................37
A. Admiralty roots in the federal courts
___,.................39
B. State courts and constitutional issues
......................40
C. Extending the doctrine beyond admiralty cases
.............41
III. Modern forum
non
conveniens doctrine
..................... 44
A. Gilbert and
Kosten
The foundations of current doctrine
......44
B. Federal transfer rules
....................................48
C. lurisdictional developments limiting the need
for forum
non
conveniens
................................49
D.
Refinement in the Supreme Court: Piper Aircraft.
...........50
E. Forum
non conveniens
and international comity
............54
F. Discretion to dismiss in whole or in part
..................· 57
G. The nationality of the plaintiff.
............................58
H. Parallel litigation and forum selection clauses
...............64
I. State or federal law?
.....................................66
J. Jurisdiction and forum
non
conveniens
....................68
K. Non-uniformity among the states
.........................71
IV. Conclusion
................................................73
Chapter
4:
Canada
...................................75
I. Common law development of forum
non
conveniens
..........75
A. One doctrine, three purposes
.............................75
B. Amchem Products: Clarifying the modern doctrine
..........78
II. Discretion to decline jurisdiction in the
Québec
Civil Code
___83
Chapter
5:
Australia
.................................87
I. Between vexation and oppression and
the most appropriate forum
...............................87
II. The clearly inappropriate forum test
.......................87
A. Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Co. Inc. v. Fay
............88
B. Voth v.
Manilára
Flour Mills Pty. Ltd.
......................90
C. Dow Jones
&
Co., Inc. v. Gutnick.
..........................97
III. Internal case allocation: the Cross-Vesting Act
...............99
IV. Summary and conclusion
..................................100
Chapter
6:
Similarities and Differences in
Common Law
Forum Non Conveniens
Doctrine
.............................................101
I, Introduction
..............................................101
II. Similarities in forum
non
conveniens doctrines
..........___101
A. The requirement of an available, alternative forum
.........102
B. Allocation of the general burden of proof on the defendant.
. 103
С
Consideration of private interest factors
___.___......... 104
vi
D.
Trial court discretion in applying forum
non
conveniens analysis
.....................,...............105
E. Ability to impose conditions on a stay or dismissal
.........105
F. Benefits of existing similarities in comparative analysis
.....106
HI. Differences in forum
non
conveniens doctrines
..............107
A. Distinctions setting Australia apart
.......................107
1.
The clearly inappropriate forum test
.................107
2.
The plaintiff s juridical advantage from
its choice of forum
................................108
B. Distinctions setting the United States apart
................
Ill
1.
Consideration of public interest factors
........,.....
Ill
2.
The post-jurisdiction nature of the doctrine
..........113
3.
The false distinction: assumed bias against
foreign plaintiffs
...................................114
C. Other distinctions
......................................116
1.
A shifting burden of proof
..........................116
2.
The Brussels Regulation in the United Kingdom
.......119
IV. Conclusions: similarity with distinctions
....................119
Chapter
7:
Related Doctrines in Civil
Law Systems
..........................................121
I. Introduction
..............................................121
II. Germany
.................................................122
III. Japan
.....................................................124
IV. The Brussels Regulation
................................... 125
V. Latin American efforts to frustrate common law
forum
non
conveniens
----.................................128
A. The foundations of Latin American concern
...............128
B.
Delgado
v.
Shell Oil and increased expressions
of concern
.....................·....................... 130
C. The emergence of forum
non conveniens
blocking statutes
.......................................132
D. A mixed reception for Latin American blocking
statutes in U.S. courts
...................................135
VI. Concluding thoughts
......................................139
VII
Chapter
8:
The Global Search for a Convention on
Jurisdiction and Judgments and Related Projects
Addressing
Lis Pendens
and Declining Jurisdiction
. 141
I. Introduction
..............................................141
II. The Hague Conference process
.............................142
A. The original mixed convention model
.....................142
B. Negotiation of a double convention text
...................144
C. Problems resulting from differing approaches to
jurisdiction
............................................146
D. Conclusion of a Convention on Choice of
Court Agreements
......................................147
III. Rules for declining jurisdiction in a global
convention: a place for forum
non conveniens?
..............148
IV. The American Law Institute and UNIDROIT
................159
A. The ALI/UNIDROIT Principles and
Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure
....................159
B. The
ALI
Recognition and Enforcement of
Foreign Judgments Project
..............................162
V. Lessons for the future
.....................................166
A. Issues among common law states
........................167
1.
Hague Interim Text Article
22
and
common law similarities
...........................167
2.
Hague Interim Text Article
22
and
common law differences
...........................169
B. Issues between civil law and common law states
...........172
1.
The general problem of the homeward-trend
........172
2.
The civil law focus on jurisdiction based on
the defendant s domicile
............................173
3.
Differing approaches to the concept of
mandatory rules
...................................178
VI. Looking ahead
............................................180
Chapter
9:
The Future for Now:
Forum Non Conveniens
and the
2005
Hague Convention on Choice of Court
Agreements
...................„......................183
L
Introduction
..............................................183
II. Forum
non conveniens
and choice of court agreements
in the United States
.......................................184
VIH
A. Choice of court in U.S. law
..............................185
B. The convergence of choice of court clauses and the
forum
non conveniens
doctrine
..........................191
1.
Apparent resolution in Bremen
......................192
2.
Separate doctrines, common issues
..................192
3.
Litigant problems at the intersection of
choice of court and forum
non
conveniens
...........194
a. The possibilities
...................................194
b. The case law
......................................197
1)
Exclusive (mandatory) clauses
...................198
2)
Non-exclusive (permissive) clauses
...............200
3)
Non-exclusive clauses with waiver of objections
to venue
.......................................201
4)
The importance of the clause to the analysis
.......202
5)
Problems with categorization
....................202
III. The rationale for a Hague Convention on Choice of
Court Agreements
.........................................204
IV. The
2005
Hague Convention on Choice of
Court Agreements
.........................................206
V. Conclusion
...............................................209
Appendices
A.
1999
Hague Preliminary Draft Convention Text for a
Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of
Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters
.................211
B. Relevant provisions of the Nygh/Pocar Report
...............233
C. 200J Hague Interim Text for a Convention on
Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in
Civil and Commercial Matters
.,...........................253
D.
2005
Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements
......311
ix
|
| adam_txt |
Table of
Contents
Preface
.хш
Chapter
і:
Common Law
Forum Non Conveniens:
Four Countries, Four Approaches
.
ι
Chapter
2:
The United Kingdom
.7
I. Scotland: From forum
non competens
to most
appropriate forum
.,,.7
II. England: From reticence to recognition
.11
A. First steps: the oppressive and vexatious principle
.11
B. The most suitable forum approach
.14
C. Modern forum
non
conveniens doctrine in England
.21
III. The impact of the Brussels Convention and Regulation
.24
A. The basic framework
.25
B. Owusu v. Jackson
.28
IV. Current forum
non
conveniens analysis
in the United Kingdom
.33
Chapter
3:
The United States
.37
I. Introduction
.37
II. Early development
.37
A. Admiralty roots in the federal courts
_,.39
B. State courts and constitutional issues
.40
C. Extending the doctrine beyond admiralty cases
.41
III. Modern forum
non
conveniens doctrine
. 44
A. Gilbert and
Kosten
The foundations of current doctrine
.44
B. Federal transfer rules
.48
C. lurisdictional developments limiting the need
for forum
non
conveniens
.49
D.
Refinement in the Supreme Court: Piper Aircraft.
.50
E. Forum
non conveniens
and international comity
.54
F. Discretion to dismiss in whole or in part
.· 57
G. The nationality of the plaintiff.
.58
H. Parallel litigation and forum selection clauses
.64
I. State or federal law?
.66
J. Jurisdiction and forum
non
conveniens
.68
K. Non-uniformity among the states
.71
IV. Conclusion
.73
Chapter
4:
Canada
.75
I. Common law development of forum
non
conveniens
.75
A. One doctrine, three purposes
.75
B. Amchem Products: Clarifying the modern doctrine
.78
II. Discretion to decline jurisdiction in the
Québec
Civil Code
_83
Chapter
5:
Australia
.87
I. Between "vexation and oppression" and
the "most appropriate forum"
.87
II. The "clearly inappropriate forum" test
.87
A. Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Co. Inc. v. Fay
.88
B. Voth v.
Manilára
Flour Mills Pty. Ltd.
.90
C. Dow Jones
&
Co., Inc. v. Gutnick.
.97
III. Internal case allocation: the Cross-Vesting Act
.99
IV. Summary and conclusion
.100
Chapter
6:
Similarities and Differences in
Common Law
Forum Non Conveniens
Doctrine
.101
I, Introduction
.101
II. Similarities in forum
non
conveniens doctrines
._101
A. The requirement of an available, alternative forum
.102
B. Allocation of the general burden of proof on the defendant.
. 103
С
Consideration of private interest factors
_._. 104
vi
D.
Trial court discretion in applying forum
non
conveniens analysis
.,.105
E. Ability to impose conditions on a stay or dismissal
.105
F. Benefits of existing similarities in comparative analysis
.106
HI. Differences in forum
non
conveniens doctrines
.107
A. Distinctions setting Australia apart
.107
1.
The clearly inappropriate forum test
.107
2.
The plaintiff's juridical advantage from
its choice of forum
.108
B. Distinctions setting the United States apart
.
Ill
1.
Consideration of public interest factors
.,.
Ill
2.
The post-jurisdiction nature of the doctrine
.113
3.
The false distinction: assumed bias against
foreign plaintiffs
.114
C. Other distinctions
.116
1.
A shifting burden of proof
.116
2.
The Brussels Regulation in the United Kingdom
.119
IV. Conclusions: similarity with distinctions
.119
Chapter
7:
Related Doctrines in Civil
Law Systems
.121
I. Introduction
.121
II. Germany
.122
III. Japan
.124
IV. The Brussels Regulation
. 125
V. Latin American efforts to frustrate common law
forum
non
conveniens
----.128
A. The foundations of Latin American concern
.128
B.
Delgado
v.
Shell Oil and increased expressions
of concern
.·. 130
C. The emergence of forum
non conveniens
blocking statutes
.132
D. A mixed reception for Latin American blocking
statutes in U.S. courts
.135
VI. Concluding thoughts
.139
VII
Chapter
8:
The Global Search for a Convention on
Jurisdiction and Judgments and Related Projects
Addressing
Lis Pendens
and Declining Jurisdiction
. 141
I. Introduction
.141
II. The Hague Conference process
.142
A. The original mixed convention model
.142
B. Negotiation of a double convention text
.144
C. Problems resulting from differing approaches to
jurisdiction
.146
D. Conclusion of a Convention on Choice of
Court Agreements
.147
III. Rules for declining jurisdiction in a global
convention: a place for forum
non conveniens?
.148
IV. The American Law Institute and UNIDROIT
.159
A. The ALI/UNIDROIT Principles and
Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure
.159
B. The
ALI
Recognition and Enforcement of
Foreign Judgments Project
.162
V. Lessons for the future
.166
A. Issues among common law states
.167
1.
Hague Interim Text Article
22
and
common law similarities
.167
2.
Hague Interim Text Article
22
and
common law differences
.169
B. Issues between civil law and common law states
.172
1.
The general problem of the "homeward-trend"
.172
2.
The civil law focus on jurisdiction based on
the defendant's domicile
.173
3.
Differing approaches to the concept of
mandatory rules
.178
VI. Looking ahead
.180
Chapter
9:
The Future for Now:
Forum Non Conveniens
and the
2005
Hague Convention on Choice of Court
Agreements
.„.183
L
Introduction
.183
II. Forum
non conveniens
and choice of court agreements
in the United States
.184
VIH
A. Choice of court in U.S. law
.185
B. The convergence of choice of court clauses and the
forum
non conveniens
doctrine
.191
1.
Apparent resolution in Bremen
.192
2.
Separate doctrines, common issues
.192
3.
Litigant problems at the intersection of
choice of court and forum
non
conveniens
.194
a. The possibilities
.194
b. The case law
.197
1)
Exclusive (mandatory) clauses
.198
2)
Non-exclusive (permissive) clauses
.200
3)
Non-exclusive clauses with waiver of objections
to venue
.201
4)
The importance of the clause to the analysis
.202
5)
Problems with categorization
.202
III. The rationale for a Hague Convention on Choice of
Court Agreements
.204
IV. The
2005
Hague Convention on Choice of
Court Agreements
.206
V. Conclusion
.209
Appendices
A.
1999
Hague Preliminary Draft Convention Text for a
Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of
Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters
.211
B. Relevant provisions of the Nygh/Pocar Report
.233
C. 200J Hague Interim Text for a Convention on
Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in
Civil and Commercial Matters
.,.253
D.
2005
Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements
.311
ix |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Brand, Ronald A. 1952- Jablonski, Scott R. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)139805303 |
| author_facet | Brand, Ronald A. 1952- Jablonski, Scott R. |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Brand, Ronald A. 1952- |
| author_variant | r a b ra rab s r j sr srj |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV035034342 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K7625 |
| callnumber-raw | K7625 |
| callnumber-search | K7625 |
| callnumber-sort | K 47625 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| classification_rvk | PT 317 PU 1550 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)166281757 (DE-599)BVBBV035034342 |
| dewey-full | 347.012 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.012 |
| dewey-search | 347.012 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.012 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02465nam a2200577zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035034342</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20090805 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080902s2007 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2006939348</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780195329278</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-532927-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)166281757</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV035034342</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K7625</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 317</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139854:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 1550</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139929:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brand, Ronald A.</subfield><subfield code="d">1952-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)139805303</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forum non conveniens</subfield><subfield code="b">history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements</subfield><subfield code="c">Ronald A. Brand ; Scott R. Jablonski</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XV, 342 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CILE studies</subfield><subfield code="v">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen</subfield><subfield code="f">2005 Juni 30</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7541149-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationaal privaatrecht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechterlijke bevoegdheid</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsmacht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forum non conveniens</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws</subfield><subfield code="x">Jurisdiction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Beschränkung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4247482-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Parteiautonomie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4140761-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Zuständigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027387-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationales Zivilprozessrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114041-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen</subfield><subfield code="f">2005 Juni 30</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7541149-0</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internationale Zuständigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027387-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Parteiautonomie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4140761-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Beschränkung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4247482-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Internationales Zivilprozessrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114041-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jablonski, Scott R.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CILE studies</subfield><subfield code="v">3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021616669</subfield><subfield code="9">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Regensburg</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016703260&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016703260</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV035034342 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T21:50:59Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:20:41Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780195329278 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2006939348 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016703260 |
| oclc_num | 166281757 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-739 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-739 DE-188 |
| physical | XV, 342 S. |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | Oxford Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series | CILE studies |
| series2 | CILE studies |
| spelling | Brand, Ronald A. 1952- Verfasser (DE-588)139805303 aut Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements Ronald A. Brand ; Scott R. Jablonski New York Oxford Univ. Press 2007 XV, 342 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier CILE studies 3 Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen 2005 Juni 30 (DE-588)7541149-0 gnd rswk-swf Internationaal privaatrecht gtt Rechterlijke bevoegdheid gtt Rechtsmacht gtt Forum non conveniens Conflict of laws Jurisdiction Beschränkung (DE-588)4247482-6 gnd rswk-swf Parteiautonomie (DE-588)4140761-1 gnd rswk-swf Internationale Zuständigkeit (DE-588)4027387-8 gnd rswk-swf Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 gnd rswk-swf Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen 2005 Juni 30 (DE-588)7541149-0 u DE-604 Internationale Zuständigkeit (DE-588)4027387-8 s Parteiautonomie (DE-588)4140761-1 s Beschränkung (DE-588)4247482-6 s Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 s Jablonski, Scott R. Verfasser aut CILE studies 3 (DE-604)BV021616669 3 Digitalisierung UB Regensburg application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016703260&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Brand, Ronald A. 1952- Jablonski, Scott R. Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements CILE studies Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen 2005 Juni 30 (DE-588)7541149-0 gnd Internationaal privaatrecht gtt Rechterlijke bevoegdheid gtt Rechtsmacht gtt Forum non conveniens Conflict of laws Jurisdiction Beschränkung (DE-588)4247482-6 gnd Parteiautonomie (DE-588)4140761-1 gnd Internationale Zuständigkeit (DE-588)4027387-8 gnd Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)7541149-0 (DE-588)4247482-6 (DE-588)4140761-1 (DE-588)4027387-8 (DE-588)4114041-2 |
| title | Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |
| title_auth | Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |
| title_exact_search | Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |
| title_full | Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements Ronald A. Brand ; Scott R. Jablonski |
| title_fullStr | Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements Ronald A. Brand ; Scott R. Jablonski |
| title_full_unstemmed | Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements Ronald A. Brand ; Scott R. Jablonski |
| title_short | Forum non conveniens |
| title_sort | forum non conveniens history global practice and future under the hague convention on choice of court agreements |
| title_sub | history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |
| topic | Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen 2005 Juni 30 (DE-588)7541149-0 gnd Internationaal privaatrecht gtt Rechterlijke bevoegdheid gtt Rechtsmacht gtt Forum non conveniens Conflict of laws Jurisdiction Beschränkung (DE-588)4247482-6 gnd Parteiautonomie (DE-588)4140761-1 gnd Internationale Zuständigkeit (DE-588)4027387-8 gnd Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen 2005 Juni 30 Internationaal privaatrecht Rechterlijke bevoegdheid Rechtsmacht Forum non conveniens Conflict of laws Jurisdiction Beschränkung Parteiautonomie Internationale Zuständigkeit Internationales Zivilprozessrecht |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016703260&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV021616669 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT brandronalda forumnonconvenienshistoryglobalpracticeandfutureunderthehagueconventiononchoiceofcourtagreements AT jablonskiscottr forumnonconvenienshistoryglobalpracticeandfutureunderthehagueconventiononchoiceofcourtagreements |