Nominal versus indexed debt: a quantitative horse race

The main arguments in favor and against nominal and indexed debt are the incentive to default through inflation versus hedging against unforeseen shocks. We model and calibrate these arguments to assess their quantitative importance. We use a dynamic equilibrium model with tax distortion, government...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alfaro, Laura (Author), Kanczuk, Fabio 1969- (Author)
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2007
Series:Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research 13131
Online Access:Volltext
Summary:The main arguments in favor and against nominal and indexed debt are the incentive to default through inflation versus hedging against unforeseen shocks. We model and calibrate these arguments to assess their quantitative importance. We use a dynamic equilibrium model with tax distortion, government outlays uncertainty, and contingent-debt service. Our framework also recognizes that contingent debt can be associated with incentive problems and lack of commitment. Thus, the benefits of unexpected inflation are tempered by higher interest rates. We obtain that costs from inflation more than offset the benefits from reducing tax distortions. We further discuss sustainability of nominal debt in developing (volatile) countries.
Item Description:Literaturverz. S. 23 - 25
Physical Description:30 S. graph. Darst. 22 cm

There is no print copy available.

Interlibrary loan Place Request Caution: Not in THWS collection! Get full text